Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #213745 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-09-05 09:43 +0000 |
| Last post | 2020-10-20 07:41 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 339 — 42 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.folklore.computers
Must-read computer folklore books Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-09-05 09:43 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books bert <bert.hutchings@btinternet.com> - 2020-09-05 04:22 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Rick Umali <rickumali@gmail.com> - 2020-09-05 13:44 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-09-05 16:45 +0100
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-09-05 16:22 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-09-05 18:33 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-09-05 21:43 +0100
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-09-05 20:02 +0100
Re: Must-read computer folklore books JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-09-05 17:19 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Fred Smith <fred@thejanitor.corp> - 2020-09-06 00:15 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-09-05 18:32 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-09-07 11:27 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books usenet@only.tnx (Questor) - 2020-09-05 18:02 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2020-09-05 17:31 -0300
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-09-05 18:24 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-09-05 18:30 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-09-05 19:58 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books usenet@only.tnx (Questor) - 2020-09-05 21:49 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-09-08 21:10 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-05 17:38 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-09-06 08:56 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-09-06 01:31 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Iron Spring Software <Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com> - 2020-09-06 08:30 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2020-09-06 14:00 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-18 06:50 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-18 08:31 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2020-10-18 22:18 -0400
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Adam Sampson <ats@offog.org> - 2020-10-19 05:06 +0100
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Jan van den Broek <fortytwo@xs4all.nl> - 2020-09-10 22:01 +0100
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-10 16:12 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2020-09-10 20:53 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-11 06:48 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books usenet@only.tnx (Questor) - 2020-09-11 19:22 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-09-12 12:32 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2020-09-11 11:03 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-18 03:11 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-18 08:17 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2020-10-18 09:24 +0100
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-18 08:25 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-18 03:27 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-18 08:32 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2020-10-18 10:06 +0100
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-18 13:09 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-18 09:13 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-18 09:26 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-18 13:21 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-19 02:28 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-18 19:52 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-19 15:02 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-19 17:46 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-19 17:56 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2020-10-19 12:11 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-19 19:26 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2020-10-19 12:38 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-20 01:01 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-21 22:03 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2020-10-21 23:54 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-22 07:03 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-22 13:02 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-22 08:25 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-22 13:30 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-22 14:18 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-22 09:34 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-22 16:14 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2020-10-22 10:18 -0700
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN, Must-read computer folklore books John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-22 17:46 +0000
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN, Must-read computer folklore books Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-22 20:47 +0100
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-22 18:01 -0500
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-22 23:21 +0000
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-22 19:54 -0400
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-22 20:31 -0700
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN Robert Swindells <rjs@fdy2.co.uk> - 2020-10-23 10:13 +0000
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN Hook Bandit <hookbandit@gmail.com> - 2020-10-23 13:03 +0000
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-23 11:46 -0400
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> - 2020-10-25 10:33 +0100
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-25 11:22 +0000
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-26 09:42 +0000
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-26 21:55 +0000
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN, Must-read computer folklore books Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-10-23 10:52 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-22 12:08 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-10-22 18:32 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-22 13:53 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-22 13:01 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-22 16:17 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2020-10-24 09:57 +0300
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-24 07:11 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-24 07:22 -0400
mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-24 08:59 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2020-10-24 15:04 +0100
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-24 11:12 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-24 15:04 +0100
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-24 10:59 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-24 17:28 +0100
Re: mathematician equation markup? Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-24 13:03 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-24 14:28 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-24 19:41 +0100
Re: mathematician equation markup? Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-24 14:10 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-24 17:51 -0400
Collaboration tools (was Re: mathematician equation markup?) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-10-25 17:23 +0000
Re: Collaboration tools (was Re: mathematician equation markup?) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-25 17:56 +0000
Re: Collaboration tools (was Re: mathematician equation markup?) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-25 15:36 -0500
Re: Collaboration tools (was Re: mathematician equation markup?) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-26 09:37 +0000
Re: Collaboration tools (was Re: mathematician equation markup?) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-26 08:28 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-24 13:18 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-25 07:48 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-25 10:02 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-25 15:12 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-25 16:39 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-26 10:13 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-26 11:57 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-26 14:52 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-25 17:00 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-10-25 20:00 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-25 15:33 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-25 21:34 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-26 10:11 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-26 08:17 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-25 17:37 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-10-25 20:20 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-26 22:09 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-27 09:31 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-27 05:59 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-27 11:14 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-27 13:53 -0500
Re: indexing, was mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-27 19:31 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-27 19:36 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-27 16:22 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-27 20:13 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-27 23:40 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-28 09:01 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-28 15:21 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-28 10:36 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-28 14:41 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-28 16:10 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-28 21:25 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-28 17:17 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-28 22:46 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-11-01 07:38 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-28 21:24 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-28 10:36 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-27 15:56 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-27 23:51 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-27 11:14 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-27 20:06 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-10-27 20:18 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-27 15:56 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-10-28 08:38 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-28 10:36 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-10-28 13:28 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-28 15:30 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-02 15:41 -0600
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-30 20:52 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-31 19:15 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-31 21:15 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-29 08:42 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-29 09:08 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-29 11:08 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-29 08:32 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-10-29 15:28 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-29 12:52 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-10-29 17:19 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-29 13:35 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-11-01 14:25 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-11-01 16:26 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-02 16:04 -0600
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-02 15:45 -0600
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-31 17:50 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read compu Jan van den Broek <fortytwo@xs4all.nl> - 2020-11-19 20:47 +0100
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read compu Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-11-20 20:09 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-27 20:08 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-27 16:40 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-27 15:56 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-28 04:48 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2020-10-26 02:17 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-26 10:06 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2020-10-26 10:43 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-26 11:07 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-26 07:48 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-26 18:05 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-26 14:29 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-26 19:58 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-26 15:50 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-26 14:52 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-26 07:40 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-26 14:32 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-26 14:52 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-27 09:28 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-27 11:14 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-27 18:29 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-27 19:36 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-28 08:45 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Andy Leighton <andyl@azaal.plus.com> - 2020-10-28 05:29 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-10-28 08:45 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2020-10-28 10:06 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-28 11:39 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-28 16:33 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-28 10:36 -0700
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-10-28 19:00 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-28 14:45 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-28 16:07 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-10-30 06:19 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-28 16:00 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-29 08:48 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-02 15:48 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Joy Beeson <jbeeson@invalid.net.invalid> - 2020-11-02 19:25 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-03 09:50 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2020-11-02 19:34 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-11-02 19:48 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2020-11-02 20:38 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-11-03 09:19 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-03 09:56 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-11-04 22:52 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-11-05 00:42 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-11-05 06:50 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2020-11-05 01:11 -0800
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-05 09:46 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-11-07 21:55 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-11-07 23:22 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-11-05 08:37 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2020-11-05 09:51 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Richard Thiebaud <thiebauddick2@aol.com> - 2020-11-06 17:50 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2020-11-06 20:08 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-11-06 20:18 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2020-11-06 21:25 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-11-07 11:48 -0700
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-11-05 15:12 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-05 09:49 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Andy Leighton <andyl@azaal.plus.com> - 2020-11-03 03:34 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-11-06 04:51 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-11-03 15:55 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-11-03 10:59 -0700
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-11-03 19:02 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-11-03 19:26 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-11-03 10:59 -0700
Scout fires. Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-11-03 07:49 +0000
Re: Scout fires. JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-03 09:56 -0600
Re: Scout fires. Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-11-03 17:11 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> - 2020-10-28 14:23 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-28 16:08 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Fred Smith <fred@thejanitor.corp> - 2020-10-28 23:40 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-29 00:39 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-28 22:19 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-28 22:11 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-28 22:13 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-28 22:25 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2020-10-29 07:38 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-29 05:50 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-29 08:31 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-29 07:41 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-29 11:08 -0700
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-29 08:33 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-02 15:44 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-29 06:03 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> - 2020-10-29 12:10 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-29 13:29 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> - 2020-10-29 13:42 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-29 13:55 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-29 11:08 -0700
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-29 18:51 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-29 21:37 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2020-10-29 17:44 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-02 15:59 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-11-03 06:44 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-11-03 07:03 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-11-03 10:02 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-11-03 13:48 +0000
Asimov, was: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com> - 2020-11-03 13:56 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-11-03 14:05 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-11-03 15:27 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-11-03 15:57 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-11-03 16:44 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-11-03 18:37 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-03 09:52 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-11-03 18:46 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2020-11-03 19:38 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-11-03 18:48 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-11-04 00:59 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-11-03 20:40 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-11-04 18:28 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-11-04 13:36 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-11-04 19:37 +0000
ouchies, was: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com> - 2020-11-04 20:45 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-11-04 23:31 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? "Kerr-Mudd,John" <notsaying@127.0.0.1> - 2020-11-04 13:35 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-11-04 18:28 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-29 11:08 -0700
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-29 20:43 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-29 16:51 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> - 2020-10-30 10:54 +0100
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> - 2020-10-28 14:20 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-29 08:57 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> - 2020-10-29 12:04 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-29 12:49 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-29 17:01 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-29 18:52 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-29 11:08 -0700
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-29 11:08 -0700
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2020-10-29 16:58 -0300
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-29 18:59 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-26 11:37 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-26 07:35 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-26 14:52 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-26 17:20 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-10-26 17:24 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Fred Smith <fred@thejanitor.corp> - 2020-10-26 23:27 +0000
mathematician equation markup? Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-26 18:39 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-26 18:40 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-27 06:08 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-27 11:14 -0700
Re: APL, not mathematician equation markup? John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-27 19:41 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-27 17:53 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-27 19:36 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-10-27 17:38 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-28 06:36 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-24 17:07 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-24 13:47 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-25 00:11 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-22 12:08 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-22 12:08 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-10-22 16:12 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-22 12:08 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-22 17:23 -0400
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-22 19:35 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-23 08:37 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-22 19:35 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2020-10-26 22:09 -0400
Re: Must-read computer folklore books John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-27 02:58 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-19 14:31 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-20 07:45 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-10-20 18:20 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-20 14:19 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-10-20 21:41 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-21 05:58 +0100
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-20 02:02 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-20 03:01 +0100
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Jason Evans <jsevans@mailfence.com> - 2020-10-18 14:37 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-19 06:05 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books "Massimo M." <massimo79m@gmail.com> - 2020-10-20 01:26 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-20 07:41 -0500
Page 4 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 17 Next page →
| From | Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-22 13:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hvdfrrF2g76U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #214818 |
On 2020-10-22, Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> wrote: > > And that makes me recall that you could trickle space characters into > FORTRAN IV program statements anywhere you wanted them. As long as > you coded between the designated columns the only place a space > character was significant in a FORTRAN IV program was in a FORMAT > statement. You could spell FORMAT as F O R M A T or even FORM AT if > you wanted to, but once the "Hollerith" field started then spaces were > significant. I seem to recall at least some line-numbered BASICs from the home-computer era behaving similarly. Niklas -- "Ah! He has become one with his inner self!" "He's passed out." "That too." -- Vir and Garibaldi in Babylon 5:"The Parliament of Dreams"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-22 14:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hvdileFu9nkU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #214818 |
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:25:39 -0500, Dallas wrote: > On 10/22/2020 8:02 AM, Niklas Karlsson wrote: >> Sure. If everyone in a team uses their own coding style, you'll end up >> with an abominable mess, so you do need some sort of convention. If I >> was in one where Hungarian notation was policy, I'd suck it up and use >> that - doesn't mean I have to like it. >> Niklas >> >> > It seems to me that I see a trend in language syntax away from the > languages like C where newline placement did not matter, allowing some > interesting coding styles. JavaScript is like C, but Python is > definitely not like C in that regard. > > And that makes me recall that you could trickle space characters into > FORTRAN IV program statements anywhere you wanted them. As long as you > coded between the designated columns the only place a space character > was significant in a FORTRAN IV program was in a FORMAT statement. You > could spell FORMAT as F O R M A T or even FORM AT if you wanted to, but > once the "Hollerith" field started then spaces were significant. But made life a little harder for the compiler writer, classifying statements that started thus: DO10I= (I think the solution was to scan for a comma not inside parentheses) -- Using UNIX since v6 (1975)... Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-22 09:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rms5a2$g4v$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #214820 |
On 10/22/2020 9:18 AM, Bob Eager wrote: > On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:25:39 -0500, Dallas wrote: >> And that makes me recall that you could trickle space characters into >> FORTRAN IV program statements anywhere you wanted them. As long as you >> coded between the designated columns the only place a space character >> was significant in a FORTRAN IV program was in a FORMAT statement. You >> could spell FORMAT as F O R M A T or even FORM AT if you wanted to, but >> once the "Hollerith" field started then spaces were significant. > But made life a little harder for the compiler writer, classifying > statements that started thus: > DO10I= > (I think the solution was to scan for a comma not inside parentheses) > There were definitely ambiguities tolerated by the FORTRAN IV compilers. I just found this: "Fortran bug Urban Legend" https://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/~susan/cyc/p/fbug.htm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-22 16:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rmsb4u$1nit$1@gal.iecc.com> |
| In reply to | #214820 |
In article <hvdileFu9nkU1@mid.individual.net>, Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> wrote: >> And that makes me recall that you could trickle space characters into >> FORTRAN IV program statements anywhere you wanted them. ... According to "Abstracting Away the Machine: The History of the FORTRAN Programming Language", it was a concession to make programs easier to keypunch. At the time, mid-1950s, keypunchers had spent half a century entering data into fixed columns and programming language statements were pretty strange. >But made life a little harder for the compiler writer, classifying >statements that started thus: > > DO10I= > >(I think the solution was to scan for a comma not inside parentheses) I have written Fortran 77 lexers and parsers. There's a whole list of kludges like that. There's one for this: FORMAT(I3,A4) = A4**(I3-2) As should be obvious, that's a statement function, not a FORNAT statement. Even WATFOR gave up and got that one wrong. That book probably belongs on the list. You can tell the author wasn't actually there and probably doesn't know anyone who was because it has a lot of minor errors like confusing 026 and 029 keypunches. -- Regards, John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-22 10:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d2b55588-95df-4ba6-8b9b-ef703740f9b8n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #214823 |
On Thursday, October 22, 2020 at 9:14:24 AM UTC-7, John Levine wrote: > FORMAT(I3,A4) = A4**(I3-2) > As should be obvious, that's a statement function, not a FORNAT > statement. Even WATFOR gave up and got that one wrong. The only way one could even _manage_ to get it wrong would be to write the compiler to use reserved words. Which isn't how FORTRAN works. However, getting it "wrong" is not really a bad thing. Just warn the programmer; the things he won't be able to do will just be things no one should ever do anyways. John Savard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-22 17:46 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: the wonders of FORTRAN, Must-read computer folklore books |
| Message-ID | <rmsggo$2d0k$1@gal.iecc.com> |
| In reply to | #214824 |
In article <d2b55588-95df-4ba6-8b9b-ef703740f9b8n@googlegroups.com>, Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote: >On Thursday, October 22, 2020 at 9:14:24 AM UTC-7, John Levine wrote: > >> FORMAT(I3,A4) = A4**(I3-2) > >> As should be obvious, that's a statement function, not a FORNAT >> statement. Even WATFOR gave up and got that one wrong. > >The only way one could even _manage_ to get it wrong would be to write the >compiler to use reserved words. Which isn't how FORTRAN works. It got it wrong in the sense that it didn't accept it, probablty diagnosed it as an invalid FORMAT statement. >However, getting it "wrong" is not really a bad thing. Just warn the >programmer; the things he won't be able to do will just be things no >one should ever do anyways. Indeed. Please, sir, point the gun away from your foot. -- Regards, John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-22 20:47 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: the wonders of FORTRAN, Must-read computer folklore books |
| Message-ID | <20201022204722.bb70db77f4c8b6a5432a7f73@eircom.net> |
| In reply to | #214825 |
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 17:46:00 -0000 (UTC) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: > Indeed. Please, sir, point the gun away from your foot. If you insist on shooting your foot it is the job of the operating system to ensure reliable delivery of the bullet. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays C:\>WIN | A better way to focus the sun The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-22 18:01 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: the wonders of FORTRAN |
| Message-ID | <rmt2vd$q81$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #214832 |
Do any other languages besides FORTRAN have a COMPLEX number type built in?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-22 23:21 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: the wonders of FORTRAN |
| Message-ID | <hveif8Fu9nkU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #214836 |
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:01:00 -0500, Dallas wrote: > Do any other languages besides FORTRAN have a COMPLEX number type built > in? You can add one to ALGOL 68! -- Using UNIX since v6 (1975)... Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-22 19:54 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: the wonders of FORTRAN |
| Message-ID | <he64pf5pgo83oq3eg545agf2t8k8ees0i4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #214837 |
On 22 Oct 2020 23:21:12 GMT, Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> wrote: >On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:01:00 -0500, Dallas wrote: > >> Do any other languages besides FORTRAN have a COMPLEX number type built >> in? > >You can add one to ALGOL 68! It's built into Python. IIUC any number with j appended is treated as an imaginary part, so x=1+14.8j gives you a complex x. x+2j will give you 1+16.8j for example. If you want the real or imaginary parts it's x.real or x.imag.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-22 20:31 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: the wonders of FORTRAN |
| Message-ID | <1110627792.625113356.624652.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #214836 |
Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> wrote: > Do any other languages besides FORTRAN have a COMPLEX number type built in? > PL/I -- Pete
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Swindells <rjs@fdy2.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-23 10:13 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: the wonders of FORTRAN |
| Message-ID | <rmuacq$pbv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #214836 |
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:01:00 -0500, Dallas wrote: > Do any other languages besides FORTRAN have a COMPLEX number type built > in? Common Lisp
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hook Bandit <hookbandit@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-23 13:03 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: the wonders of FORTRAN |
| Message-ID | <rmukbe$nqs$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #214844 |
Someone wrote: > On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:01:00 -0500, Dallas wrote: > >> Do any other languages besides FORTRAN have a COMPLEX number type built >> in? > > Common Lisp Raku
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-23 11:46 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: the wonders of FORTRAN |
| Message-ID | <l9u5pft5dmunmgveio5bo9leqkcdejebr0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #214846 |
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 13:03:43 -0000 (UTC), Hook Bandit <hookbandit@gmail.com> wrote: >Someone wrote: > >> On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:01:00 -0500, Dallas wrote: >> >>> Do any other languages besides FORTRAN have a COMPLEX number type built >>> in? >> >> Common Lisp > >Raku R, Julia, Go. Also built into System.Numerics in .NET.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-25 10:33 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: the wonders of FORTRAN |
| Message-ID | <873622abw2.fsf@eder.anydns.info> |
| In reply to | #214836 |
On Do 22 Okt 2020 at 18:01, Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> wrote: > Do any other languages besides FORTRAN have a COMPLEX number type > built in? Common Lisp 'Andreas
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-25 11:22 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: the wonders of FORTRAN |
| Message-ID | <slrnrpao08.2ptb.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> |
| In reply to | #214836 |
On Thu, 2020-10-22, Dallas wrote: > Do any other languages besides FORTRAN have a COMPLEX number type > built in? C, since 1999. C++ has it in the library, but with no performance drawbacks compared to putting it in the core language. /Jorgen -- // Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . . \X/ snipabacken.se> O o .
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-26 09:42 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: the wonders of FORTRAN |
| Message-ID | <hvnjvnF7uo6U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #214874 |
On 2020-10-25, Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> wrote:
>
> C, since 1999. C++ has it in the library, but with no performance
> drawbacks compared to putting it in the core language.
I recall that it took an inordinate amount of time before any worthwhile
compiler fully supported C99. I wonder what was up with that. Do correct
me if I'm wrong, as I don't stay updated about C as much anymore, but
the subsequent C standards didn't seem to have the same issue.
Niklas
--
Any tour with a description beginning "Once fitted out with protective
safety gear..." has to be good.
-- Dan Birchall
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-26 21:55 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: the wonders of FORTRAN |
| Message-ID | <slrnrpehdm.2ptb.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> |
| In reply to | #214892 |
On Mon, 2020-10-26, Niklas Karlsson wrote: > On 2020-10-25, Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> wrote: >> >> C, since 1999. C++ has it in the library, but with no performance >> drawbacks compared to putting it in the core language. > > I recall that it took an inordinate amount of time before any worthwhile > compiler fully supported C99. I wonder what was up with that. Microsoft decided they weren't interested in C for some reason, and still refuse to implement C99. We speculated in why over in comp.lang.c, but noone seems to know. The GCC people may have been more interested in C++ at the time (they had C++98 to deal with) or perhaps they were unused to new standards showing up. > Do correct me if I'm wrong, as I don't stay updated about C as much > anymore, but the subsequent C standards didn't seem to have the same > issue. C11? I don't know; past C99 I haven't stayed updated, either. /Jorgen -- // Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . . \X/ snipabacken.se> O o .
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-23 10:52 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: the wonders of FORTRAN, Must-read computer folklore books |
| Message-ID | <rmucm1$vih$1@newsreader4.netcologne.de> |
| In reply to | #214825 |
John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> schrieb:
> In article <d2b55588-95df-4ba6-8b9b-ef703740f9b8n@googlegroups.com>,
> Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote:
>>However, getting it "wrong" is not really a bad thing. Just warn the
>>programmer; the things he won't be able to do will just be things no
>>one should ever do anyways.
> Indeed. Please, sir, point the gun away from your foot.
That is an interesting question, when to warn and when not
to warn...
There is the classic
A = B ** (4/5)
which has probably happened (similar forms) thousands of times.
Now, gfortran will warn about this with -Wall (since a few releases
ago) with
4 | b = a ** (4/5)
| 1
Warning: Integer division truncated to constant '0' at (1) [-Winteger-division]
because b = a was probably not the intention of that particular
code. I like to think that this has saved numerous people's bacon
over the years. Note that 4/2 will not be warned about.
And yet, one very well-respected member of the Fortran community
complained that this warning was cluttering up his error messages,
and he didn't particularly like having to add yet another warning
exception (-Wno-integer-division) to his compiler flags.
I think in that respect, pleasing everybody with what warnings
to issue and which ones not to issue is at least as difficult as
proving or disproving that N=NP.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-22 12:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <466621186.625086274.297344.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #214824 |
Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote: > On Thursday, October 22, 2020 at 9:14:24 AM UTC-7, John Levine wrote: > >> FORMAT(I3,A4) = A4**(I3-2) > >> As should be obvious, that's a statement function, not a FORNAT >> statement. Even WATFOR gave up and got that one wrong. > > The only way one could even _manage_ to get it wrong would be to write the > compiler to use reserved words. Which isn't how FORTRAN works. > > However, getting it "wrong" is not really a bad thing. Just warn the > programmer; the things he won't be able to do will just be things no > one should ever do anyways. > That kind of stuff adds extra complexity to the parse, though. Mostly I can parse PL/I by looking ahead one token [LL(1)?], but in some cases I have to look ahead several, such as looking forward for the “=“ to determine that a statement is an assignment (in some cases). Of course I’m not a compiler expert, so YMMV. -- Pete
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 17 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.folklore.computers
csiph-web