Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #214159 > unrolled thread
| Started by | hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-09-11 11:53 -0700 |
| Last post | 2020-09-18 12:24 -0700 |
| Articles | 7 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.folklore.computers
As We May Think--early computer article 1945 hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2020-09-11 11:53 -0700
Re: As We May Think--early computer article 1945 Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2020-09-11 15:28 -0700
Re: As We May Think--early computer article 1945 J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-09-11 20:52 -0400
Re: As We May Think--early computer article 1945 Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-09-12 09:25 +0000
Analog computers Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-09-12 10:39 +0000
Re: Analog computers J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-09-12 10:02 -0400
Re: As We May Think--early computer article 1945 hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2020-09-18 12:24 -0700
| From | hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-11 11:53 -0700 |
| Subject | As We May Think--early computer article 1945 |
| Message-ID | <5b5146f2-ae59-4c44-ad32-9e7506e73f85o@googlegroups.com> |
In 1945 chief scientist Vannevar Bush wrote an article on the future of mechanized information processing. I believe Bush invented the analog computer. LIFE magazine published an excerpt. It may be viewed here: https://books.google.com/books?id=uUkEAAAAMBAJ&lpg=PA118&dq=life%20%22as%20we%20may%20think%22&pg=PA112#v=onepage&q&f=false (Same issue has an illustrated piece on occupation of Japan.)
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-11 15:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4b4577d7-ac28-45b6-a28b-299eadebfebdo@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #214159 |
On Friday, September 11, 2020 at 12:53:02 PM UTC-6, hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote: > I believe Bush invented the analog computer. That depends on how you define 'analog computer', since some would dignify the Gunter scale and William Oughtred's invention by that name. However, the differential analyzer of Vannevar Bush, unlike, say, a mechanical tide predictor (another much earlier device sometimes called an analog computer) was very much a mechanical device that had the same functionality as an electronic analog computer: through feedback between functions, functions of those functions, adn integrals or differentials of those functions, it could produce an analog solution to a differential equation. A tide predictor, on the other hand, just cranks out numerical values for a Fourier series that is already known; the differential analyzer solved problems where the solution was not known. So there is definitely a sense in which the Bush differential analyzer was the first 'real' analog computer. John Savard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-11 20:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <kc6olfd4n797187tobr9k89d2cej5agv0o@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #214170 |
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:28:24 -0700 (PDT), Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote: >On Friday, September 11, 2020 at 12:53:02 PM UTC-6, hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote: > >> I believe Bush invented the analog computer. > >That depends on how you define 'analog computer', since some would dignify the >Gunter scale and William Oughtred's invention by that name. However, the >differential analyzer of Vannevar Bush, unlike, say, a mechanical tide predictor >(another much earlier device sometimes called an analog computer) was very much >a mechanical device that had the same functionality as an electronic analog >computer: through feedback between functions, functions of those functions, adn >integrals or differentials of those functions, it could produce an analog >solution to a differential equation. > >A tide predictor, on the other hand, just cranks out numerical values for a >Fourier series that is already known; the differential analyzer solved problems >where the solution was not known. > >So there is definitely a sense in which the Bush differential analyzer was the >first 'real' analog computer. According to wiki Lord Kelvin and his brother James Thompson published a description of a device that is identifiably a differential analyzer in 1876. Machines derived from this work were, as you said, used as tide predictors but also were the first computers used to direct naval gunfire, and were in use for that purpose in 1916. > >John Savard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-12 09:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hs3igaFrpevU11@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #214177 |
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 20:52:13 -0400, J. Clarke wrote: > On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:28:24 -0700 (PDT), Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> > wrote: > >>On Friday, September 11, 2020 at 12:53:02 PM UTC-6, hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com >>wrote: >> >>> I believe Bush invented the analog computer. >> >>That depends on how you define 'analog computer', since some would >>dignify the Gunter scale and William Oughtred's invention by that name. >>However, the differential analyzer of Vannevar Bush, unlike, say, a >>mechanical tide predictor (another much earlier device sometimes called >>an analog computer) was very much a mechanical device that had the same >>functionality as an electronic analog computer: through feedback between >>functions, functions of those functions, adn integrals or differentials >>of those functions, it could produce an analog solution to a >>differential equation. >> >>A tide predictor, on the other hand, just cranks out numerical values >>for a Fourier series that is already known; the differential analyzer >>solved problems where the solution was not known. >> >>So there is definitely a sense in which the Bush differential analyzer >>was the first 'real' analog computer. > > According to wiki Lord Kelvin and his brother James Thompson published a > description of a device that is identifiably a differential analyzer in > 1876. Machines derived from this work were, as you said, used as tide > predictors but also were the first computers used to direct naval > gunfire, and were in use for that purpose in 1916. I went to a demo of a Meccano replica of the Hartree differential analyser. I'm in some of the videos (in a blue and white checked short!). It's fascinating. https://youtu.be/ngCBqduGr1Y (actually the second part, the first is mainly a lecture). -- Using UNIX since v6 (1975)... Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-12 10:39 +0000 |
| Subject | Analog computers |
| Message-ID | <hs3mqdFs1qvU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #214177 |
On 2020-09-12, J Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> According to wiki Lord Kelvin and his brother James Thompson published
> a description of a device that is identifiably a differential analyzer
> in 1876. Machines derived from this work were, as you said, used as
> tide predictors but also were the first computers used to direct naval
> gunfire, and were in use for that purpose in 1916.
Where do submarine torpedo data computers fit into this? They were
widely used in WWII, at the very least.
Niklas
--
} >A manual has, at least, some basis in fact,
} Erm, excuse me?
Usually, the name of the program matches the manual's title page.
-- DPM, Patrick R. Wade and Rik Steenwinkel in asr
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-12 10:02 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Analog computers |
| Message-ID | <n3lplf9l1h3i0oif49jfuck4krnd6jheq5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #214183 |
On 12 Sep 2020 10:39:09 GMT, Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> wrote: >On 2020-09-12, J Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> According to wiki Lord Kelvin and his brother James Thompson published >> a description of a device that is identifiably a differential analyzer >> in 1876. Machines derived from this work were, as you said, used as >> tide predictors but also were the first computers used to direct naval >> gunfire, and were in use for that purpose in 1916. > >Where do submarine torpedo data computers fit into this? They were >widely used in WWII, at the very least. The TDC that the US Navy used would be another example. However I believe that that development started around the same time that Vannever Bush was demonstrating his machine, so I wasn't counting it as prior art.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-18 12:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b7d2bc66-de76-44be-a7ae-32f5ce1e8570o@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #214170 |
On Friday, September 11, 2020 at 6:28:25 PM UTC-4, Quadibloc wrote: > On Friday, September 11, 2020 at 12:53:02 PM UTC-6, hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote: > > > I believe Bush invented the analog computer. > > That depends on how you define 'analog computer', since some would dignify the > Gunter scale and William Oughtred's invention by that name. However, the > differential analyzer of Vannevar Bush, unlike, say, a mechanical tide predictor > (another much earlier device sometimes called an analog computer) was very much > a mechanical device that had the same functionality as an electronic analog > computer: through feedback between functions, functions of those functions, adn > integrals or differentials of those functions, it could produce an analog > solution to a differential equation. A company, EAI, made analog computers for many years. Their section on bitsavers contains a ton of material describe technology, what kinds of problems could be solved them, and other information. Neat color pictures in their catalogs. Better brush up on your differential equations first! http://bitsavers.org/pdf/eai/ Brochure with neat photos http://bitsavers.org/pdf/eai/16-231R/EAI.231R.1961.102646219.pdf Sample application brief: Oxygen dynamics http://bitsavers.org/pdf/eai/applicationsLibrary/7.4.10a_Simulation_of_Oxygen_Dynamics_1964.pdf
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | alt.folklore.computers
csiph-web