Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #156902 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-18 10:35 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-01-24 10:08 +0000 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 39 participants
Thread has 1005 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to alt.folklore.computers | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1005 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-18 10:35 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Andy Burns <usenet.jan2016@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2016-01-18 16:09 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-18 17:17 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-18 19:19 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-01-19 00:44 -0400
Re: Thanks Obama Andy Burns <usenet.jan2016@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2016-01-19 07:28 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-19 12:42 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 11:18 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 04:25 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 13:56 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-01-18 13:08 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-18 12:00 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 15:28 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-19 09:45 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-19 20:37 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 11:35 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 20:39 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-19 07:22 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 06:42 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-18 18:55 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 20:41 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-18 22:40 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 23:11 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-18 23:26 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-19 08:08 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-19 16:56 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 19:57 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-19 21:32 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-01-20 14:12 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-20 03:05 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-21 12:27 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-21 12:55 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-19 10:06 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 06:48 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-19 14:44 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-19 09:07 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-20 06:43 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 06:49 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-20 12:09 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-20 15:21 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-01-20 16:24 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2016-01-20 17:04 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-20 18:09 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 05:44 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-01-20 10:53 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-20 11:22 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-20 20:19 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 07:47 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-20 21:24 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 08:55 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-20 17:07 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-21 11:59 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-20 16:32 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-23 12:03 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-23 15:12 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-23 14:14 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-23 21:17 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-23 14:13 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 18:25 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 18:10 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-20 22:40 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 19:03 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 19:01 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-20 17:33 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-21 12:15 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-20 16:29 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 09:07 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-20 17:54 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 19:20 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-20 19:47 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 13:27 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 12:09 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-19 07:30 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-19 12:22 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 05:35 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-19 10:59 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-01-19 16:26 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-19 21:31 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 17:51 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-19 17:05 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 10:59 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 20:03 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 13:19 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 10:56 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 20:12 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 13:31 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 22:45 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 15:27 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 06:45 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "Sam James" <cf@nospam.com> - 2016-01-21 05:26 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 18:48 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-20 00:56 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 18:16 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 06:47 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-21 13:17 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-20 16:29 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-20 16:43 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-21 05:28 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 10:26 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 10:22 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 20:09 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 13:23 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 22:39 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 14:44 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 06:36 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-20 07:00 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 18:17 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-20 08:08 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 19:18 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 06:56 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-20 16:29 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-21 07:51 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 19:36 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-23 14:53 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 04:28 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-23 18:56 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 07:44 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 06:59 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-21 08:16 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-21 15:58 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-21 16:37 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-01-21 10:47 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-23 15:33 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-23 17:22 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-01-23 15:30 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-24 11:05 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 05:21 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-19 20:56 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-19 17:01 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-19 22:11 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-19 18:09 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-20 11:44 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-20 18:09 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-20 16:58 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-20 23:48 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-21 13:34 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 09:06 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 16:55 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-22 03:38 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-30 15:00 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-20 18:17 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-20 13:45 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-20 22:03 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-27 14:00 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-20 17:33 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-19 16:23 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-19 22:32 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-19 20:34 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-20 02:51 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 22:46 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-21 13:19 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-20 16:29 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-20 17:42 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-21 13:42 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 09:10 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 19:30 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-21 18:35 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-21 13:31 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 09:05 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-19 16:20 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-19 22:23 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-21 12:31 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:59 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 17:55 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-19 17:24 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 19:51 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-19 21:04 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-20 03:24 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-19 21:52 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 15:31 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-19 20:53 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 17:34 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 22:58 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-20 13:15 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-20 19:39 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-20 20:09 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 13:30 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-21 02:29 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-27 13:39 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-27 15:12 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 18:18 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-28 00:30 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 21:45 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 20:46 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 17:26 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-28 13:11 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Lawrence Statton <lawrence@senguio.mx> - 2016-01-27 15:31 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 18:20 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-28 12:16 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-01-28 14:23 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Lawrence Statton <lawrence@senguio.mx> - 2016-01-28 09:14 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-01-28 15:34 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-28 20:11 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-28 12:27 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-01-28 12:52 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-01-28 14:10 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-28 20:19 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-29 09:57 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-01-29 14:08 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-29 15:08 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-29 20:12 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-29 19:30 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "Simmy Jacks" <sk98@nospam.com> - 2016-01-30 05:10 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-29 22:13 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama "Orange" <oq7755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 09:59 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-28 15:43 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-29 00:38 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-01-29 03:06 -0400
Re: Thanks Obama "Simmy Jacks" <sk98@nospam.com> - 2016-01-29 19:53 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Lawrence Statton <lawrence@senguio.mx> - 2016-01-29 09:12 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-29 18:36 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-29 09:48 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-29 07:32 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-29 07:48 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-29 13:40 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-01-29 17:57 -0400
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-29 22:21 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-29 17:40 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 19:38 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-29 18:14 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-30 11:12 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 09:47 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 09:31 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-30 10:40 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 13:21 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-31 00:16 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 11:21 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 13:24 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 15:32 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-30 15:29 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 16:57 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 19:00 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:43 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 16:22 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-31 19:30 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 21:56 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 06:40 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 09:32 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 08:12 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-31 02:42 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-31 16:43 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-02-01 00:18 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-02-01 13:11 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-02-01 16:03 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 06:10 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "Blanco" <rko4410@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 12:56 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-30 15:23 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 17:05 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-30 17:54 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-31 04:39 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:42 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-31 17:30 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 12:35 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-31 19:39 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 16:23 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-31 19:41 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 08:12 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-02-01 08:51 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 14:51 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-02-02 05:40 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-02-01 21:17 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 17:02 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-02-01 13:56 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 09:36 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-02-01 11:33 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 14:51 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-02-01 15:28 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-02-01 15:03 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-02-01 16:26 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 17:02 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-02-01 16:05 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-02-02 10:09 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-02-02 00:21 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-02-02 12:58 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-02-02 09:51 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-02-01 18:55 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-02-02 13:04 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-02-01 21:39 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-02-02 20:34 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 18:29 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 14:30 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-02-01 11:30 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-31 19:49 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 08:12 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-02-01 08:54 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-02-01 07:55 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-02-01 11:05 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-02-01 16:03 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-02-01 12:31 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 15:24 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-31 21:19 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-31 17:14 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-02-01 16:03 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-02-01 11:14 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-02-02 14:52 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-02-02 15:41 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-02-03 14:25 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-02-03 16:40 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-03 15:16 -0700
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-02-02 10:59 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-02-03 14:25 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-02-03 17:31 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-02-03 18:10 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "Hilo Black" <hbk897@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 06:35 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-02-03 21:11 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "Blanco" <rko4410@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 13:54 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-03 15:16 -0700
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-02-04 11:07 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-02-04 15:14 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 04:39 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-02-04 11:57 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-02-03 18:11 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "Hilo Black" <hbk897@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 06:37 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-02-03 20:55 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-02-04 15:14 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 10:49 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-04 10:51 -0700
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-02-04 14:49 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-04 15:24 -0700
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-02-04 20:22 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-02-05 03:32 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-02-05 14:41 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 18:21 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "Blanco" <rko4410@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 04:59 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 19:53 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-02-05 14:41 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-05 08:11 -0700
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-02-05 15:03 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 04:50 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-02-05 13:25 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-02-05 19:57 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-02-05 15:19 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 19:29 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-02-06 14:35 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 06:11 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-02-05 14:56 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "Hilo Black" <hbk897@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 06:29 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-02-03 14:11 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "Blanco" <rko4410@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 13:47 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-02-03 21:07 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-02-03 16:12 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-02-03 21:50 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-02-03 16:58 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-02-04 15:06 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-02-04 09:55 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 10:43 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-04 10:51 -0700
Re: Thanks Obama Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-02-04 17:57 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-04 15:24 -0700
Re: Thanks Obama pechter@pechter.dyndns.org (William Pechter) - 2016-02-05 18:54 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-02-05 19:42 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 14:10 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Andy Leighton <andyl@azaal.plus.com> - 2016-02-08 03:31 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-02-08 14:12 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-02-03 18:28 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-02-04 01:47 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-02-03 21:41 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "Blanco" <rko4410@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 14:46 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-02-03 20:58 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-02-03 22:34 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-02-03 22:17 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-02-03 23:18 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "Blanco" <rko4410@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 17:43 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-02-04 15:07 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 22:56 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "Blanco" <rko4410@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 13:57 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-02-04 14:35 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "Blanco" <rko4410@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 04:27 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-02-04 11:11 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 22:40 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-02-04 15:00 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "Blanco" <rko4410@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 13:53 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-04 06:03 -0700
Re: Thanks Obama "Blanco" <rko4410@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 04:11 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-04 10:51 -0700
Re: Thanks Obama "Blanco" <rko4410@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 05:10 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-02-05 00:15 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama Lawrence Statton <lawrence@senguio.mx> - 2016-02-04 18:55 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "Blanco" <rko4410@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 15:17 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "Blanco" <rko4410@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 15:14 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-02-05 17:15 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama "Blanco" <rko4410@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 05:03 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-02-04 14:33 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "Blanco" <rko4410@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 04:22 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-02-03 21:31 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-02-04 15:14 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "Blanco" <rko4410@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 04:56 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 06:08 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-02-04 15:14 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 04:35 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-03 15:15 -0700
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-02-03 17:25 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-02-04 15:14 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-02-04 10:03 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "Blanco" <rko4410@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 05:04 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-02-04 10:14 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "Blanco" <rko4410@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 04:51 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-02-05 00:08 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-02-05 14:41 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-05 08:11 -0700
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-02-05 17:24 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-02-06 14:35 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 06:15 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-02-06 16:24 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-02-07 10:17 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 17:16 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-02-05 16:32 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "Blanco" <rko4410@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 05:14 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-02-05 11:25 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-02-06 14:35 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 10:07 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 04:47 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-02-05 13:50 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-02-05 15:08 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-02-05 14:50 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-02-06 05:17 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 11:45 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 05:29 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 05:59 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 14:51 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-02-01 15:32 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 17:02 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 10:07 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-02-01 21:22 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-02-01 15:59 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-02-01 17:59 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-02-01 19:12 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 09:30 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-02-02 14:52 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-02-02 15:41 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 05:30 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-31 16:58 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-02-01 12:42 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-30 09:59 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 11:21 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-31 05:20 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-30 15:51 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-31 17:49 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-30 09:59 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-30 10:40 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-02-01 00:03 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-02-01 07:36 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-02-01 16:03 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-02-01 10:11 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-02-01 12:28 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-02-01 13:53 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-02-01 16:24 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-02-02 10:04 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-30 16:18 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@Last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-30 13:00 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-29 19:30 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-29 23:39 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-01-30 12:23 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-29 20:12 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-01-29 18:25 -0400
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-29 17:29 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 16:21 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-29 23:02 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-30 10:10 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-29 19:23 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-30 16:42 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-30 11:08 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-30 07:45 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 09:48 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-30 17:25 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-01-29 19:33 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-28 20:17 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-29 10:02 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-28 12:35 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-28 20:32 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-28 15:10 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-29 10:54 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-29 10:08 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-29 11:01 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-01-28 21:07 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-28 15:55 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "Orange" <oq7755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 13:08 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-29 18:27 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-29 18:38 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 21:40 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-20 22:08 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-21 07:35 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 19:35 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-21 11:08 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 04:33 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-21 19:33 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-24 20:31 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Lawrence Statton <lawrence@senguio.mx> - 2016-01-24 22:11 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-24 23:17 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 16:54 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 15:55 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-26 14:55 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-26 08:03 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "Orange" <oq7755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 05:09 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-26 13:31 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-26 10:59 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-26 14:46 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-26 12:28 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-26 15:41 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-26 16:31 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-26 13:45 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-26 18:24 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-26 17:32 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-26 20:59 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-26 19:47 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-27 17:20 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 06:02 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-27 07:20 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-27 18:14 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-27 21:24 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-28 05:02 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-27 07:20 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-27 07:36 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-28 04:58 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-26 18:00 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-26 20:24 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-28 10:51 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-01-28 13:15 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-28 17:04 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-01-29 11:14 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-28 19:23 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-28 23:54 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 16:31 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-29 17:50 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-29 19:30 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 19:41 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-29 20:21 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 18:43 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-26 18:03 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-27 09:23 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-28 14:08 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-28 16:36 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-29 00:38 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-29 13:13 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-29 10:20 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-26 18:43 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-26 15:41 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-26 21:18 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 18:44 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 19:34 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-19 18:40 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-19 10:15 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-19 15:51 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-19 11:46 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-01-19 11:09 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 18:06 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-19 20:44 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 22:53 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-20 06:48 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 06:54 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-20 16:29 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Ibmekon <Ibmekon> - 2016-01-20 11:32 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-19 17:39 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-19 12:22 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-19 12:42 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 18:01 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-19 21:43 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 22:51 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-20 00:48 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-01-21 18:57 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 22:07 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 12:23 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-01-22 17:48 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-23 11:26 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-24 04:02 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-23 20:15 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-19 21:57 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-20 07:17 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 06:57 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-20 12:16 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-20 18:01 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 18:49 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-21 05:34 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-21 21:30 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-22 05:41 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-22 14:45 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-22 21:19 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-23 11:15 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-23 21:00 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-01-20 06:57 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-01-20 14:12 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-20 14:05 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-01-20 09:00 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-20 15:41 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-20 16:03 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 05:41 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-20 17:33 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-20 15:26 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 05:39 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 18:54 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-21 12:17 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Lawrence Statton <lawrence@senguio.mx> - 2016-01-20 22:01 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-19 12:40 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-19 16:38 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-19 21:38 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-20 16:29 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 09:01 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-20 17:54 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 12:01 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-20 19:00 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "James Green" <667755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 15:59 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-23 18:57 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-23 21:00 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-23 20:16 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-24 13:38 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-23 22:51 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-24 16:24 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-24 00:41 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-24 18:30 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-25 02:15 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-23 23:39 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-24 17:31 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-24 01:12 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-23 23:29 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-24 18:42 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 07:54 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-24 10:39 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-24 10:51 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-24 14:07 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 08:55 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-25 01:49 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-24 19:12 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 12:54 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Lawrence Statton <lawrence@senguio.mx> - 2016-01-24 22:08 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-26 00:00 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-23 21:49 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 07:45 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-24 11:36 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-24 11:01 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 06:27 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-25 02:15 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 15:44 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-25 02:15 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-25 02:15 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-24 19:23 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 16:12 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 11:34 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-25 10:11 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-25 14:07 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-25 12:18 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-25 17:09 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-25 22:43 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-25 16:21 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-25 16:42 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 18:33 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-25 19:09 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 19:14 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 22:48 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-25 22:25 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 11:35 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-26 08:11 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-01-26 18:23 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-26 15:41 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-26 14:56 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-26 13:44 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 19:07 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama - Monica Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-26 20:37 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 21:40 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-26 19:53 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-26 19:42 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Lawrence Statton <lawrence@senguio.mx> - 2016-01-26 21:59 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-27 17:17 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-27 14:06 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-28 09:03 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 06:00 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-27 07:20 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-27 07:43 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 13:59 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 18:10 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 17:33 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-27 16:58 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 20:50 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-01-28 14:26 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-28 19:23 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-28 22:42 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-29 17:06 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-01-29 14:03 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-29 14:14 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-01-29 20:55 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-29 21:16 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-29 19:30 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-30 09:41 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-30 09:34 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-29 19:29 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-01-30 15:19 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-30 10:40 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-01-31 14:56 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-02-01 05:03 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 11:20 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-02-01 14:35 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 14:51 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-02-01 15:07 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-02-01 16:29 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-02-01 21:24 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 17:02 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-02-01 18:33 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-02-01 21:34 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 17:02 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-02-02 14:08 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 16:27 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-27 16:46 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-28 14:19 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 20:00 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-01-28 23:11 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 05:25 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-01-29 06:11 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-29 11:08 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-29 13:15 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-29 10:21 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-01-27 14:36 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-27 07:20 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-26 16:46 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-01-27 14:33 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-27 16:04 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-27 13:05 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-27 17:31 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-28 05:07 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-26 16:36 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 19:03 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-27 13:12 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-26 09:48 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 19:17 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-26 20:39 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-26 09:44 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-23 21:46 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-24 01:27 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-23 23:35 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-24 01:48 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 07:35 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-24 14:08 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-24 19:40 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 07:32 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-24 11:36 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 14:38 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-24 16:33 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 17:09 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-25 12:50 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 11:52 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 05:00 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 14:45 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-24 16:33 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-24 15:48 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 09:06 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-24 22:14 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 17:25 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 09:59 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-25 12:54 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-26 00:18 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-26 07:40 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-26 19:19 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 06:58 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 18:23 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "Orange" <oq7755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 10:50 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-24 16:52 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-24 19:03 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-24 22:26 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-25 08:25 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-25 10:23 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-25 10:02 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-25 12:47 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-26 05:58 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-25 15:16 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-25 16:42 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-25 14:12 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-25 18:05 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 19:05 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-26 12:12 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-26 08:11 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 11:45 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 18:59 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 19:00 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-26 11:04 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-26 11:20 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-28 14:29 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-28 13:21 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-28 17:55 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-28 19:23 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-28 17:08 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-28 23:06 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "Orange" <oq7755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:16 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-29 10:32 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-29 07:32 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 12:39 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-26 15:41 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-26 13:37 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-27 09:56 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-27 09:28 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-25 23:07 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-25 17:21 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-26 10:46 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 19:10 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-26 04:25 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-26 16:17 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 06:53 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-26 08:11 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-26 14:15 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-26 11:59 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-26 18:39 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-27 05:00 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-26 15:58 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-26 11:36 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-26 18:36 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:05 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 22:10 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-26 04:28 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-26 16:20 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-26 01:28 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-26 19:16 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-26 14:04 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-26 09:35 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-27 04:56 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-26 22:46 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-27 10:02 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 19:15 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-28 14:21 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 20:01 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-29 13:23 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-26 13:59 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-27 04:53 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-25 08:25 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-25 10:27 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-25 12:48 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-26 06:15 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-25 16:42 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-25 22:34 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-26 09:16 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 06:59 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-26 13:39 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-26 14:09 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-26 16:31 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-26 09:36 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-27 05:12 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-30 15:12 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-31 12:03 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-01-31 14:19 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-31 20:54 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-31 22:08 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-02-01 12:25 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-02-01 08:03 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 15:26 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-01-31 15:43 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 21:58 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-31 17:05 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-01-31 23:26 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-31 22:25 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-02-01 19:44 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-02-01 07:49 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-02-02 05:48 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-02-01 14:14 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-02-02 09:44 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-02-01 17:29 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-02-02 10:59 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-31 18:48 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-02-01 22:34 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-02-02 09:21 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-27 04:58 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-26 22:47 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-27 10:03 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-26 23:26 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-27 11:14 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-26 08:11 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-26 09:41 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:02 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-26 17:48 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 21:38 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-27 04:11 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-26 22:46 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 06:04 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-27 10:59 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-27 14:18 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-27 13:30 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-27 11:14 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-27 14:39 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-28 09:07 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "Orange" <oq7755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 04:19 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 11:41 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-26 21:10 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 21:25 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Lawrence Statton <lawrence@senguio.mx> - 2016-01-26 21:55 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-26 13:35 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 19:02 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-01-27 15:42 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-01-27 16:49 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-27 12:05 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-26 17:41 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-27 11:22 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-26 22:53 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-27 12:28 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-27 15:02 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-27 21:49 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-28 00:26 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-27 21:50 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-31 19:47 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-01-28 13:17 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-27 17:34 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-31 19:39 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-28 00:12 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-28 11:51 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-27 06:08 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 06:07 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-27 12:18 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-28 04:56 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-28 04:51 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-27 07:20 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-01-27 15:42 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-27 07:46 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 18:11 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-27 16:41 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 21:43 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-01-28 13:20 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-27 18:14 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-28 00:05 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-25 08:25 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-26 00:52 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-25 12:55 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-25 16:42 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-25 14:15 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "Orange" <oq7755@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 09:44 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-25 22:49 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-01-26 18:18 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 08:58 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-24 10:06 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-24 17:09 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-24 11:16 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-24 22:09 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 17:20 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-24 16:30 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-24 22:53 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 18:05 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 10:35 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 09:58 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-01-25 14:55 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-23 23:42 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-24 00:02 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 07:42 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-24 10:07 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 06:21 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 14:28 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-24 16:33 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-25 02:15 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 21:55 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-24 17:12 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-25 02:15 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-24 18:48 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 06:52 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-24 10:42 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-24 10:23 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 06:22 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 14:33 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-24 16:41 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 09:01 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 17:18 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 09:56 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-24 18:36 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-24 18:24 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-24 20:19 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-24 20:03 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-24 21:12 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-24 21:02 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 16:08 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 15:40 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-25 02:20 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-25 10:29 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-25 18:14 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 12:51 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-26 14:36 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-27 04:43 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-26 22:17 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-27 09:50 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 21:53 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-24 21:43 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 15:58 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-24 19:08 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 22:20 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 16:11 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-25 10:33 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 11:31 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-25 13:53 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 18:26 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-24 18:56 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 22:18 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 16:10 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-25 09:48 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 18:14 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "jack" <jkl8976@nospam.com> - 2016-01-25 16:03 +1100
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-24 11:10 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-24 11:16 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-19 07:58 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-19 07:13 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama Andy Burns <usenet.jan2016@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2016-01-19 07:33 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-18 19:23 +0000
Re: Thanks Obama "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 14:50 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-01-18 13:55 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-18 22:47 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-19 07:36 -0500
Re: Thanks Obama Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-19 09:54 +0100
Re: Thanks Obama hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-19 08:03 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-23 19:03 -0600
Re: Thanks Obama Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-23 21:42 -0800
Re: Thanks Obama Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-24 10:08 +0000
Page 37 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 35 36 [37] 38 39 … 50 Next page →
| From | Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-26 09:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n880r6$9d5$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #157702 |
JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:33:02 -0500, "J. Clarke" > <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: >>In article <8dbc0d26-ef67-4c69-94e2-e26676d61b81@googlegroups.com>, >>hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com says... >>> >>> On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 12:35:21 PM UTC-5, JimP wrote: >>> >>> >>> > Some ex-military guy is making adverts for election of a conservative >>> > in Alabama. He blames the attacks in Paris, France on President Obama. >>> > I don't get the logic, but then I don't have my head up my buutocks. >>> >>> I suspect it's an article of faith among Republicans that Obama _is_ >>> responsible for the attacks in Paris. Many certainly said so in >>> the immediate aftermath of the Paris attacks. >> >>Don't conflate _blithering_ _idiots_ who wrap themselves in the >>"Conservative" banner with "Republicans". We need a third party, the >>"totalitarian nutcake party", into which we can toss the extreme >>elements of both the Democrats and Republicans, and while they're busy >>killing each other the rest of us can get back to civilized life. > > Then they have more numbers than the 'real Rpublicans', certainly in > the South. Yep, based on current polling, the nutcakes are substantially more than 50% of Republicans. Ralph Nader got 2.74% of the LWNJ vote. Hardly a blip. -- Dan Espen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-26 19:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3111d6ac1441aa7d989eb8@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #157764 |
In article <n880r6$9d5$2@dont-email.me>, despen@verizon.net says... > > JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:33:02 -0500, "J. Clarke" > > <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: > >>In article <8dbc0d26-ef67-4c69-94e2-e26676d61b81@googlegroups.com>, > >>hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com says... > >>> > >>> On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 12:35:21 PM UTC-5, JimP wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > Some ex-military guy is making adverts for election of a conservative > >>> > in Alabama. He blames the attacks in Paris, France on President Obama. > >>> > I don't get the logic, but then I don't have my head up my buutocks. > >>> > >>> I suspect it's an article of faith among Republicans that Obama _is_ > >>> responsible for the attacks in Paris. Many certainly said so in > >>> the immediate aftermath of the Paris attacks. > >> > >>Don't conflate _blithering_ _idiots_ who wrap themselves in the > >>"Conservative" banner with "Republicans". We need a third party, the > >>"totalitarian nutcake party", into which we can toss the extreme > >>elements of both the Democrats and Republicans, and while they're busy > >>killing each other the rest of us can get back to civilized life. > > > > Then they have more numbers than the 'real Rpublicans', certainly in > > the South. > > Yep, based on current polling, the nutcakes are substantially more than > 50% of Republicans. > > Ralph Nader got 2.74% of the LWNJ vote. Hardly a blip. Why would anybody in his right mind vote for Ralph Nader? His heart is in the right place but his head is in the wrong one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-26 20:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n896v4$ald$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #157868 |
"J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> writes: > In article <n880r6$9d5$2@dont-email.me>, despen@verizon.net says... >> >> JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:33:02 -0500, "J. Clarke" >> > <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>In article <8dbc0d26-ef67-4c69-94e2-e26676d61b81@googlegroups.com>, >> >>hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com says... >> >>> >> >>> On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 12:35:21 PM UTC-5, JimP wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > Some ex-military guy is making adverts for election of a conservative >> >>> > in Alabama. He blames the attacks in Paris, France on President Obama. >> >>> > I don't get the logic, but then I don't have my head up my buutocks. >> >>> >> >>> I suspect it's an article of faith among Republicans that Obama _is_ >> >>> responsible for the attacks in Paris. Many certainly said so in >> >>> the immediate aftermath of the Paris attacks. >> >> >> >>Don't conflate _blithering_ _idiots_ who wrap themselves in the >> >>"Conservative" banner with "Republicans". We need a third party, the >> >>"totalitarian nutcake party", into which we can toss the extreme >> >>elements of both the Democrats and Republicans, and while they're busy >> >>killing each other the rest of us can get back to civilized life. >> > >> > Then they have more numbers than the 'real Rpublicans', certainly in >> > the South. >> >> Yep, based on current polling, the nutcakes are substantially more than >> 50% of Republicans. >> >> Ralph Nader got 2.74% of the LWNJ vote. Hardly a blip. > > Why would anybody in his right mind vote for Ralph Nader? His heart is > in the right place but his head is in the wrong one. There a lot more than 2.74% of the voters that are not in their right minds. Way, way more. -- Dan Espen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-26 09:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n880iv$9d5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #157683 |
"J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> writes: > However the real difficulty with that approach is that there is no real > consensus on what constitutes a "loon"--show the same symptoms to three > different psychiatrists and they may come up with three different > diagnoses, and they can't tell a sane person pretending to be nuts from > a real nut (although there is anecdotal evidence to suggest that real > nuts have little difficulty making such a distinction). Actually, the current crop of RWNJs display paranoia. A clear psychiatric diagnosis. -- Dan Espen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-23 21:46 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <7d2733cb-9118-4291-a14d-d925f85f200f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #157448 |
On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 7:00:06 PM UTC-7, D_J_E wrote: > Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> writes: > > On 20-Jan-16 15:29, Peter Flass wrote: > >> The [US] military is way underfunded. > > You're kidding, right? We spend more than the next nine countries > > combined--six of which are allies! NATO and other US allies together > > account for well over half of total world military spending. > Don't act so surprised. > Easily half the voting public in the US believes this. > Beats me why this is true. > I guess fear trumps reason. The "logic" being, you can > never be too safe. Russia invaded Georgia in 2008. One or more people died. Vladimir Putin is still in charge of Russia, instead of having been placed on trial in Georgia, and executed for the crime of aggressive war, like Hideki Tojo. Hence, the U.S. military is not, at present, capable of ensuring justice, peace, and freedom for all the people of the Earth. Hence, it is clearly not sufficiently well funded to achieve its objectives. Also, in Iraq, women have been raped by ISIS, and irreplaceable historic monuments have been destroyed by it - one quite recently, in fact. Again, the U.S. military was not capable of preventing this. The U.S. military will not be "underfunded" when bad things like this stop happening in the world, and everyone enjoys peace and freedom. John Savard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-24 01:27 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n81u7m$9v5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #157460 |
On 1/23/2016 11:46 PM, Quadibloc wrote: > Russia invaded Georgia in 2008. One or more people died. > > Vladimir Putin is still in charge of Russia, instead of having been placed on > trial in Georgia, and executed for the crime of aggressive war, like Hideki > Tojo. Putin should certainly be on trial for that. OTOH, George Bush should be on trial for attacking Iraq, where hundreds of thousands of people died. What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. > Hence, the U.S. military is not, at present, capable of ensuring justice, > peace, and freedom for all the people of the Earth. Hence, it is clearly not > sufficiently well funded to achieve its objectives. I can't decide if you're being satirical, or not. Is there any reason to believe that such is the objective of the US military? > Also, in Iraq, women have been raped by ISIS, and irreplaceable historic > monuments have been destroyed by it - one quite recently, in fact. Again, the > U.S. military was not capable of preventing this. > > The U.S. military will not be "underfunded" when bad things like this stop > happening in the world, and everyone enjoys peace and freedom. It's my understanding (from both news reports and Iraqis) that in Iraq, women (and religious minorities) were pretty safe before the US attacked. So how did that help? The US military made that worse, not better.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-23 23:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3beb92c8-a21f-4a6e-a52a-f2d234aec70d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #157465 |
On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 12:27:26 AM UTC-7, Dave Garland wrote: > It's my understanding (from both news reports and Iraqis) that in > Iraq, women (and religious minorities) were pretty safe before the US > attacked. So how did that help? The US military made that worse, not > better. The U.S. military may have "made things worse" in certain respects by overthrowing Saddam Hussein. However, that doesn't mean they were incapable of finishing the job instead of leaving chaos lying around. Also, this criticism overlooks the fact that even worse things *were* made better by U.S. military actions. No missiles have been launched from Iraq into the territory of any civilized nation since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. If you will recall, missiles from Iraq *did* hit Israel during the first Gulf War. Thus, I find criticisms of the U.S. for overthrowing Saddam Hussein to be quite bizarre. Had his missiles hit, say, Baltimore or even Sydney, the U.S. wouldn't have waited until the _second_ Gulf War to overthrow Saddam Hussein. So the first Gulf War should have gone to its logical conclusion: Israeli troops occupying Iraq from one end to the other after its unconditional surrender. John Savard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-24 01:48 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n81vga$d81$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #157468 |
On 1/24/2016 1:35 AM, Quadibloc wrote: > On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 12:27:26 AM UTC-7, Dave Garland wrote: > >> It's my understanding (from both news reports and Iraqis) that in >> Iraq, women (and religious minorities) were pretty safe before the US >> attacked. So how did that help? The US military made that worse, not >> better. > > The U.S. military may have "made things worse" in certain respects by > overthrowing Saddam Hussein. Certainly in the "women, rape" category they did. However, that doesn't mean they were incapable of > finishing the job instead of leaving chaos lying around. I don't know if they were incapable of it or not, but they certainly didn't. Maybe it wasn't one of Bush's objectives. > > Also, this criticism overlooks the fact that even worse things *were* made > better by U.S. military actions. No missiles have been launched from Iraq into > the territory of any civilized nation since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. If > you will recall, missiles from Iraq *did* hit Israel during the first Gulf War. > > Thus, I find criticisms of the U.S. for overthrowing Saddam Hussein to be quite > bizarre. Had his missiles hit, say, Baltimore or even Sydney, the U.S. wouldn't > have waited until the _second_ Gulf War to overthrow Saddam Hussein. Of course. But that wasn't likely to happen, any more than Israeli missiles hitting those oargets. So the > first Gulf War should have gone to its logical conclusion: Israeli troops > occupying Iraq from one end to the other after its unconditional surrender. Israeli troups occupying a country where everyone hated their guts? Oh, that sounds like a forumla for success. Though it didn't work well for the Germans.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-24 07:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.310e8f18e2703de4989e82@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #157472 |
In article <n81vga$d81$1@dont-email.me>, dave.garland@wizinfo.com says... > > On 1/24/2016 1:35 AM, Quadibloc wrote: > > On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 12:27:26 AM UTC-7, Dave Garland wrote: > > > >> It's my understanding (from both news reports and Iraqis) that in > >> Iraq, women (and religious minorities) were pretty safe before the US > >> attacked. So how did that help? The US military made that worse, not > >> better. > > > > The U.S. military may have "made things worse" in certain respects by > > overthrowing Saddam Hussein. > > Certainly in the "women, rape" category they did. > > However, that doesn't mean they were incapable of > > finishing the job instead of leaving chaos lying around. > > I don't know if they were incapable of it or not, but they certainly > didn't. Maybe it wasn't one of Bush's objectives. > > > > Also, this criticism overlooks the fact that even worse things *were* made > > better by U.S. military actions. No missiles have been launched from Iraq into > > the territory of any civilized nation since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. If > > you will recall, missiles from Iraq *did* hit Israel during the first Gulf War. > > > > Thus, I find criticisms of the U.S. for overthrowing Saddam Hussein to be quite > > bizarre. Had his missiles hit, say, Baltimore or even Sydney, the U.S. wouldn't > > have waited until the _second_ Gulf War to overthrow Saddam Hussein. > > Of course. But that wasn't likely to happen, any more than Israeli > missiles hitting those oargets. > > So the > > first Gulf War should have gone to its logical conclusion: Israeli troops > > occupying Iraq from one end to the other after its unconditional surrender. > > Israeli troups occupying a country where everyone hated their guts? > Oh, that sounds like a forumla for success. Though it didn't work well > for the Germans. Well, Americna troops occupying a country where everyone hated their guts didn't work out too well either. But then a democratically elected government doesn't seem to be having much success either.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-24 14:08 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n83ari$eev$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #157472 |
On 24-Jan-16 01:48, Dave Garland wrote: > On 1/24/2016 1:35 AM, Quadibloc wrote: >> So the first Gulf War should have gone to its logical conclusion: >> Israeli troops occupying Iraq from one end to the other after its >> unconditional surrender. > > Israeli troups occupying a country where everyone hated their guts? > Oh, that sounds like a forumla for success. Yes, their occupation of Palestine has worked out so well. S -- Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "kipg" <io@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-24 19:40 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <dgjgvaF6t8qU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #157468 |
"Quadibloc" <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote in message news:3beb92c8-a21f-4a6e-a52a-f2d234aec70d@googlegroups.com... > On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 12:27:26 AM UTC-7, Dave Garland wrote: > >> It's my understanding (from both news reports and Iraqis) that in >> Iraq, women (and religious minorities) were pretty safe before the US >> attacked. So how did that help? The US military made that worse, not >> better. > > The U.S. military may have "made things worse" in certain respects by > overthrowing Saddam Hussein. No may have about it, they did. And in every respect except on the question of who was running the country. > However, that doesn't mean they were incapable of > finishing the job instead of leaving chaos lying around. They were anyway. There is no way that the Iraqis were ever going to let anyone decide what happened in their country. > Also, this criticism overlooks the fact that even worse things *were* made > better by U.S. military actions. No missiles have been launched from Iraq > into > the territory of any civilized nation since the overthrow of Saddam > Hussein. Pity about the immense piles of corpses. > If you will recall, missiles from Iraq *did* hit Israel during the first > Gulf War. And didn't actually do much damage at all. > Thus, I find criticisms of the U.S. for overthrowing Saddam Hussein to be > quite bizarre. Your problem, as always. > Had his missiles hit, say, Baltimore or even Sydney, That was never possible. > the U.S. wouldn't have waited until the _second_ > Gulf War to overthrow Saddam Hussein. Completely academic question. > So the first Gulf War should have gone to its logical conclusion: Nope. It made no sense at all to invade Iraq because that was never going to produce a useful result. > Israeli troops occupying Iraq from one end to the other The Israelis aren't that stupid. > after its unconditional surrender. That was never going to happen either.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-24 07:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.310e8e4d932317a6989e81@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #157468 |
In article <3beb92c8-a21f-4a6e-a52a-f2d234aec70d@googlegroups.com>, jsavard@ecn.ab.ca says... > > On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 12:27:26 AM UTC-7, Dave Garland wrote: > > > It's my understanding (from both news reports and Iraqis) that in > > Iraq, women (and religious minorities) were pretty safe before the US > > attacked. So how did that help? The US military made that worse, not > > better. > > The U.S. military may have "made things worse" in certain respects by > overthrowing Saddam Hussein. However, that doesn't mean they were incapable of > finishing the job instead of leaving chaos lying around. > > Also, this criticism overlooks the fact that even worse things *were* made > better by U.S. military actions. No missiles have been launched from Iraq into > the territory of any civilized nation since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. If > you will recall, missiles from Iraq *did* hit Israel during the first Gulf War. > > Thus, I find criticisms of the U.S. for overthrowing Saddam Hussein to be quite > bizarre. Had his missiles hit, say, Baltimore or even Sydney, the U.S. wouldn't > have waited until the _second_ Gulf War to overthrow Saddam Hussein. So the > first Gulf War should have gone to its logical conclusion: Israeli troops > occupying Iraq from one end to the other after its unconditional surrender. Had the US not invaded Iraq, Saddam probably would not have fired those missiles, so you're arguing a straw man. The reason Gulf War I had to happen was Saddam invading Kuwait. He was given an opportunity to say "oops" and pull out, he refused to take it instead using Kuwait as a bargaining chip to try to get the Israelis to pull out of Palestine. That wasn't on the table and wasn't going to be on the table. He was given told "remove your army from Kuwait or we will remove it for you", and he decided to let the coalition do the removing, which it promptly did. One could argue that the invasion of Kuwait was a failure of US diplomacy in that the US ambassador failed to make it clear to Saddam that if he invaded Kuwait the US would kill all of his soldiers and blow up all his tanks and airplanes. After Gulf War I he did not shoot missiles at anybody. The problem there was that after being defeated, insted of getting on with life he decided to play games and after a while he got the Western public confused over what was true, what was false, and what was a game he was playing, which gave Bush ample rope to hang him. Removing him was a bad thing because more people have died as a result of his removal than would have died if he had continued to lob his 50 years out of date rockets at Israel, which seemed to be treating them as an opportunity for trap-shooting on a grand scale.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-24 11:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1758389058.475345056.561812.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #157482 |
J. Clarke <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: > In article <3beb92c8-a21f-4a6e-a52a-f2d234aec70d@googlegroups.com>, > jsavard@ecn.ab.ca says... >> >> On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 12:27:26 AM UTC-7, Dave Garland wrote: >> >>> It's my understanding (from both news reports and Iraqis) that in >>> Iraq, women (and religious minorities) were pretty safe before the US >>> attacked. So how did that help? The US military made that worse, not >>> better. >> >> The U.S. military may have "made things worse" in certain respects by >> overthrowing Saddam Hussein. However, that doesn't mean they were incapable of >> finishing the job instead of leaving chaos lying around. >> >> Also, this criticism overlooks the fact that even worse things *were* made >> better by U.S. military actions. No missiles have been launched from Iraq into >> the territory of any civilized nation since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. If >> you will recall, missiles from Iraq *did* hit Israel during the first Gulf War. >> >> Thus, I find criticisms of the U.S. for overthrowing Saddam Hussein to be quite >> bizarre. Had his missiles hit, say, Baltimore or even Sydney, the U.S. wouldn't >> have waited until the _second_ Gulf War to overthrow Saddam Hussein. So the >> first Gulf War should have gone to its logical conclusion: Israeli troops >> occupying Iraq from one end to the other after its unconditional surrender. > > Had the US not invaded Iraq, Saddam probably would not have fired those > missiles, so you're arguing a straw man. > > The reason Gulf War I had to happen was Saddam invading Kuwait. He was > given an opportunity to say "oops" and pull out, he refused to take it > instead using Kuwait as a bargaining chip to try to get the Israelis to > pull out of Palestine. That wasn't on the table and wasn't going to be > on the table. He was given told "remove your army from Kuwait or we > will remove it for you", and he decided to let the coalition do the > removing, which it promptly did. > > One could argue that the invasion of Kuwait was a failure of US > diplomacy in that the US ambassador failed to make it clear to Saddam > that if he invaded Kuwait the US would kill all of his soldiers and blow > up all his tanks and airplanes. Probably so. > > After Gulf War I he did not shoot missiles at anybody. The problem > there was that after being defeated, insted of getting on with life he > decided to play games and after a while he got the Western public > confused over what was true, what was false, and what was a game he was > playing, which gave Bush ample rope to hang him. He kept firing missiles at planes enforcing the UN-declared"no fly zone". It was only a matter of time until he managed to hit one of our airplanes. > > Removing him was a bad thing because more people have died as a result > of his removal than would have died if he had continued to lob his 50 > years out of date rockets at Israel, which seemed to be treating them as > an opportunity for trap-shooting on a grand scale. > That's a very short-term way to judge something. Was Caesar's conquest of Gaul a good thing or a bad thing? It gave them 400+ years of peace and prosperity, but the people being conquered would probably say it was bad. -- Pete
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-24 14:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.310ef249ed077a33989e8b@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #157496 |
In article <1758389058.475345056.561812.peter_flass- yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>, peter_flass@yahoo.com says... > > J. Clarke <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: > > In article <3beb92c8-a21f-4a6e-a52a-f2d234aec70d@googlegroups.com>, > > jsavard@ecn.ab.ca says... > >> > >> On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 12:27:26 AM UTC-7, Dave Garland wrote: > >> > >>> It's my understanding (from both news reports and Iraqis) that in > >>> Iraq, women (and religious minorities) were pretty safe before the US > >>> attacked. So how did that help? The US military made that worse, not > >>> better. > >> > >> The U.S. military may have "made things worse" in certain respects by > >> overthrowing Saddam Hussein. However, that doesn't mean they were incapable of > >> finishing the job instead of leaving chaos lying around. > >> > >> Also, this criticism overlooks the fact that even worse things *were* made > >> better by U.S. military actions. No missiles have been launched from Iraq into > >> the territory of any civilized nation since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. If > >> you will recall, missiles from Iraq *did* hit Israel during the first Gulf War. > >> > >> Thus, I find criticisms of the U.S. for overthrowing Saddam Hussein to be quite > >> bizarre. Had his missiles hit, say, Baltimore or even Sydney, the U.S. wouldn't > >> have waited until the _second_ Gulf War to overthrow Saddam Hussein. So the > >> first Gulf War should have gone to its logical conclusion: Israeli troops > >> occupying Iraq from one end to the other after its unconditional surrender. > > > > Had the US not invaded Iraq, Saddam probably would not have fired those > > missiles, so you're arguing a straw man. > > > > The reason Gulf War I had to happen was Saddam invading Kuwait. He was > > given an opportunity to say "oops" and pull out, he refused to take it > > instead using Kuwait as a bargaining chip to try to get the Israelis to > > pull out of Palestine. That wasn't on the table and wasn't going to be > > on the table. He was given told "remove your army from Kuwait or we > > will remove it for you", and he decided to let the coalition do the > > removing, which it promptly did. > > > > One could argue that the invasion of Kuwait was a failure of US > > diplomacy in that the US ambassador failed to make it clear to Saddam > > that if he invaded Kuwait the US would kill all of his soldiers and blow > > up all his tanks and airplanes. > > Probably so. > > > > > After Gulf War I he did not shoot missiles at anybody. The problem > > there was that after being defeated, insted of getting on with life he > > decided to play games and after a while he got the Western public > > confused over what was true, what was false, and what was a game he was > > playing, which gave Bush ample rope to hang him. > > He kept firing missiles at planes enforcing the UN-declared"no fly zone". > It was only a matter of time until he managed to hit one of our airplanes. There was that too. I do find myself wondering how he would have reacted if the response to the first firing of such a missile was a full on SEAD strike on his air defenses. > > Removing him was a bad thing because more people have died as a result > > of his removal than would have died if he had continued to lob his 50 > > years out of date rockets at Israel, which seemed to be treating them as > > an opportunity for trap-shooting on a grand scale. > > > > That's a very short-term way to judge something. Was Caesar's conquest of > Gaul a good thing or a bad thing? It gave them 400+ years of peace and > prosperity, but the people being conquered would probably say it was bad. That's the thing, Saddam was providing peace and prosperity for any Iraqis who didn't want to engage in political opposition or stir up some other kind of trouble. The current "democratic" government is not doing nearly as well in that regard, in part because there's a majority that badly wants to oppress a minority (and I'm not talking about Muslims and Christians, there are two major Islamic divisions, one of which seems to like to blow up, shoot, rape, torture, stone, and otherwise make miserable the other division. Whether it goes the other way as well I'm not sure.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-24 16:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <916897909.475363662.271229.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #157518 |
J. Clarke <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: > In article <1758389058.475345056.561812.peter_flass- > yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>, peter_flass@yahoo.com says... >> >> J. Clarke <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: >>> In article <3beb92c8-a21f-4a6e-a52a-f2d234aec70d@googlegroups.com>, >>> jsavard@ecn.ab.ca says... >>>> >>>> On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 12:27:26 AM UTC-7, Dave Garland wrote: >>>> >>>>> It's my understanding (from both news reports and Iraqis) that in >>>>> Iraq, women (and religious minorities) were pretty safe before the US >>>>> attacked. So how did that help? The US military made that worse, not >>>>> better. >>>> >>>> The U.S. military may have "made things worse" in certain respects by >>>> overthrowing Saddam Hussein. However, that doesn't mean they were incapable of >>>> finishing the job instead of leaving chaos lying around. >>>> >>>> Also, this criticism overlooks the fact that even worse things *were* made >>>> better by U.S. military actions. No missiles have been launched from Iraq into >>>> the territory of any civilized nation since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. If >>>> you will recall, missiles from Iraq *did* hit Israel during the first Gulf War. >>>> >>>> Thus, I find criticisms of the U.S. for overthrowing Saddam Hussein to be quite >>>> bizarre. Had his missiles hit, say, Baltimore or even Sydney, the U.S. wouldn't >>>> have waited until the _second_ Gulf War to overthrow Saddam Hussein. So the >>>> first Gulf War should have gone to its logical conclusion: Israeli troops >>>> occupying Iraq from one end to the other after its unconditional surrender. >>> >>> Had the US not invaded Iraq, Saddam probably would not have fired those >>> missiles, so you're arguing a straw man. >>> >>> The reason Gulf War I had to happen was Saddam invading Kuwait. He was >>> given an opportunity to say "oops" and pull out, he refused to take it >>> instead using Kuwait as a bargaining chip to try to get the Israelis to >>> pull out of Palestine. That wasn't on the table and wasn't going to be >>> on the table. He was given told "remove your army from Kuwait or we >>> will remove it for you", and he decided to let the coalition do the >>> removing, which it promptly did. >>> >>> One could argue that the invasion of Kuwait was a failure of US >>> diplomacy in that the US ambassador failed to make it clear to Saddam >>> that if he invaded Kuwait the US would kill all of his soldiers and blow >>> up all his tanks and airplanes. >> >> Probably so. >> >>> >>> After Gulf War I he did not shoot missiles at anybody. The problem >>> there was that after being defeated, insted of getting on with life he >>> decided to play games and after a while he got the Western public >>> confused over what was true, what was false, and what was a game he was >>> playing, which gave Bush ample rope to hang him. >> >> He kept firing missiles at planes enforcing the UN-declared"no fly zone". >> It was only a matter of time until he managed to hit one of our airplanes. > > There was that too. I do find myself wondering how he would have > reacted if the response to the first firing of such a missile was a full > on SEAD strike on his air defenses. > >>> Removing him was a bad thing because more people have died as a result >>> of his removal than would have died if he had continued to lob his 50 >>> years out of date rockets at Israel, which seemed to be treating them as >>> an opportunity for trap-shooting on a grand scale. >>> >> >> That's a very short-term way to judge something. Was Caesar's conquest of >> Gaul a good thing or a bad thing? It gave them 400+ years of peace and >> prosperity, but the people being conquered would probably say it was bad. > > That's the thing, Saddam was providing peace and prosperity for any > Iraqis who didn't want to engage in political opposition or stir up some > other kind of trouble. Or have daughters who happened to catch is eye, or that of one of his sons. Or for that matter, play on the national soccer team and happen to lose a match. The current "democratic" government is not doing > nearly as well in that regard, in part because there's a majority that > badly wants to oppress a minority (and I'm not talking about Muslims and > Christians, there are two major Islamic divisions, one of which seems to > like to blow up, shoot, rape, torture, stone, and otherwise make > miserable the other division. Whether it goes the other way as well I'm > not sure. > neither side is much of an advertisement for Islam as a religion. -- Pete
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-24 17:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.310f159fe3f96db8989e8d@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #157525 |
In article <916897909.475363662.271229.peter_flass- yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>, peter_flass@yahoo.com says... > > J. Clarke <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: > > In article <1758389058.475345056.561812.peter_flass- > > yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>, peter_flass@yahoo.com says... > >> > >> J. Clarke <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> In article <3beb92c8-a21f-4a6e-a52a-f2d234aec70d@googlegroups.com>, > >>> jsavard@ecn.ab.ca says... > >>>> > >>>> On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 12:27:26 AM UTC-7, Dave Garland wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> It's my understanding (from both news reports and Iraqis) that in > >>>>> Iraq, women (and religious minorities) were pretty safe before the US > >>>>> attacked. So how did that help? The US military made that worse, not > >>>>> better. > >>>> > >>>> The U.S. military may have "made things worse" in certain respects by > >>>> overthrowing Saddam Hussein. However, that doesn't mean they were incapable of > >>>> finishing the job instead of leaving chaos lying around. > >>>> > >>>> Also, this criticism overlooks the fact that even worse things *were* made > >>>> better by U.S. military actions. No missiles have been launched from Iraq into > >>>> the territory of any civilized nation since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. If > >>>> you will recall, missiles from Iraq *did* hit Israel during the first Gulf War. > >>>> > >>>> Thus, I find criticisms of the U.S. for overthrowing Saddam Hussein to be quite > >>>> bizarre. Had his missiles hit, say, Baltimore or even Sydney, the U.S. wouldn't > >>>> have waited until the _second_ Gulf War to overthrow Saddam Hussein. So the > >>>> first Gulf War should have gone to its logical conclusion: Israeli troops > >>>> occupying Iraq from one end to the other after its unconditional surrender. > >>> > >>> Had the US not invaded Iraq, Saddam probably would not have fired those > >>> missiles, so you're arguing a straw man. > >>> > >>> The reason Gulf War I had to happen was Saddam invading Kuwait. He was > >>> given an opportunity to say "oops" and pull out, he refused to take it > >>> instead using Kuwait as a bargaining chip to try to get the Israelis to > >>> pull out of Palestine. That wasn't on the table and wasn't going to be > >>> on the table. He was given told "remove your army from Kuwait or we > >>> will remove it for you", and he decided to let the coalition do the > >>> removing, which it promptly did. > >>> > >>> One could argue that the invasion of Kuwait was a failure of US > >>> diplomacy in that the US ambassador failed to make it clear to Saddam > >>> that if he invaded Kuwait the US would kill all of his soldiers and blow > >>> up all his tanks and airplanes. > >> > >> Probably so. > >> > >>> > >>> After Gulf War I he did not shoot missiles at anybody. The problem > >>> there was that after being defeated, insted of getting on with life he > >>> decided to play games and after a while he got the Western public > >>> confused over what was true, what was false, and what was a game he was > >>> playing, which gave Bush ample rope to hang him. > >> > >> He kept firing missiles at planes enforcing the UN-declared"no fly zone". > >> It was only a matter of time until he managed to hit one of our airplanes. > > > > There was that too. I do find myself wondering how he would have > > reacted if the response to the first firing of such a missile was a full > > on SEAD strike on his air defenses. > > > >>> Removing him was a bad thing because more people have died as a result > >>> of his removal than would have died if he had continued to lob his 50 > >>> years out of date rockets at Israel, which seemed to be treating them as > >>> an opportunity for trap-shooting on a grand scale. > >>> > >> > >> That's a very short-term way to judge something. Was Caesar's conquest of > >> Gaul a good thing or a bad thing? It gave them 400+ years of peace and > >> prosperity, but the people being conquered would probably say it was bad. > > > > That's the thing, Saddam was providing peace and prosperity for any > > Iraqis who didn't want to engage in political opposition or stir up some > > other kind of trouble. > > Or have daughters who happened to catch is eye, or that of one of his sons. > Or for that matter, play on the national soccer team and happen to lose a > match. Saddam and company were majorly not nice, but I don't think that ISIS is an improvement. > The current "democratic" government is not doing > > nearly as well in that regard, in part because there's a majority that > > badly wants to oppress a minority (and I'm not talking about Muslims and > > Christians, there are two major Islamic divisions, one of which seems to > > like to blow up, shoot, rape, torture, stone, and otherwise make > > miserable the other division. Whether it goes the other way as well I'm > > not sure. > > > > neither side is much of an advertisement for Islam as a religion. And yet most Muslims are one or the other.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-25 12:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <20160125125007.be127a0e6e32aec73ea9bcc0@eircom.net> |
| In reply to | #157525 |
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 16:33:29 -0500 Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> wrote: > neither side is much of an advertisement for Islam as a religion. The inquisition and the crusade knights weren't much of an advertisment for Christianity as a religion either. As usual the extremists that make all the noise and mess do not represent the religious, merely their exploiters. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays C:>WIN | A better way to focus the sun The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-24 11:52 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <ko3aab9co9pcdnpnsohf7lu7fg1hmruh2j@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #157482 |
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 07:32:05 -0500, "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: >In article <3beb92c8-a21f-4a6e-a52a-f2d234aec70d@googlegroups.com>, >jsavard@ecn.ab.ca says... >> >> On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 12:27:26 AM UTC-7, Dave Garland wrote: >> >> > It's my understanding (from both news reports and Iraqis) that in >> > Iraq, women (and religious minorities) were pretty safe before the US >> > attacked. So how did that help? The US military made that worse, not >> > better. >> >> The U.S. military may have "made things worse" in certain respects by >> overthrowing Saddam Hussein. However, that doesn't mean they were incapable of >> finishing the job instead of leaving chaos lying around. >> >> Also, this criticism overlooks the fact that even worse things *were* made >> better by U.S. military actions. No missiles have been launched from Iraq into >> the territory of any civilized nation since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. If >> you will recall, missiles from Iraq *did* hit Israel during the first Gulf War. >> >> Thus, I find criticisms of the U.S. for overthrowing Saddam Hussein to be quite >> bizarre. Had his missiles hit, say, Baltimore or even Sydney, the U.S. wouldn't >> have waited until the _second_ Gulf War to overthrow Saddam Hussein. So the >> first Gulf War should have gone to its logical conclusion: Israeli troops >> occupying Iraq from one end to the other after its unconditional surrender. > >Had the US not invaded Iraq, Saddam probably would not have fired those >missiles, so you're arguing a straw man. > >The reason Gulf War I had to happen was Saddam invading Kuwait. He was >given an opportunity to say "oops" and pull out, he refused to take it >instead using Kuwait as a bargaining chip to try to get the Israelis to >pull out of Palestine. That wasn't on the table and wasn't going to be >on the table. He was given told "remove your army from Kuwait or we >will remove it for you", and he decided to let the coalition do the >removing, which it promptly did. > >One could argue that the invasion of Kuwait was a failure of US >diplomacy in that the US ambassador failed to make it clear to Saddam >that if he invaded Kuwait the US would kill all of his soldiers and blow >up all his tanks and airplanes. > >After Gulf War I he did not shoot missiles at anybody. The problem >there was that after being defeated, insted of getting on with life he >decided to play games and after a while he got the Western public >confused over what was true, what was false, and what was a game he was >playing, which gave Bush ample rope to hang him. > >Removing him was a bad thing because more people have died as a result >of his removal than would have died if he had continued to lob his 50 >years out of date rockets at Israel, which seemed to be treating them as >an opportunity for trap-shooting on a grand scale. I think the biggest cause of the continued deaths are the remains of Saddam's followers shooting and bombing people. -- JimP.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "kipg" <io@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-25 05:00 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <dgkhqkFffliU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #157501 |
"JimP" <solosam90@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ko3aab9co9pcdnpnsohf7lu7fg1hmruh2j@4ax.com... > On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 07:32:05 -0500, "J. Clarke" > <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: >>In article <3beb92c8-a21f-4a6e-a52a-f2d234aec70d@googlegroups.com>, >>jsavard@ecn.ab.ca says... >>> >>> On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 12:27:26 AM UTC-7, Dave Garland wrote: >>> >>> > It's my understanding (from both news reports and Iraqis) that in >>> > Iraq, women (and religious minorities) were pretty safe before the US >>> > attacked. So how did that help? The US military made that worse, not >>> > better. >>> >>> The U.S. military may have "made things worse" in certain respects by >>> overthrowing Saddam Hussein. However, that doesn't mean they were >>> incapable of >>> finishing the job instead of leaving chaos lying around. >>> >>> Also, this criticism overlooks the fact that even worse things *were* >>> made >>> better by U.S. military actions. No missiles have been launched from >>> Iraq into >>> the territory of any civilized nation since the overthrow of Saddam >>> Hussein. If >>> you will recall, missiles from Iraq *did* hit Israel during the first >>> Gulf War. >>> >>> Thus, I find criticisms of the U.S. for overthrowing Saddam Hussein to >>> be quite >>> bizarre. Had his missiles hit, say, Baltimore or even Sydney, the U.S. >>> wouldn't >>> have waited until the _second_ Gulf War to overthrow Saddam Hussein. So >>> the >>> first Gulf War should have gone to its logical conclusion: Israeli >>> troops >>> occupying Iraq from one end to the other after its unconditional >>> surrender. >> >>Had the US not invaded Iraq, Saddam probably would not have fired those >>missiles, so you're arguing a straw man. >> >>The reason Gulf War I had to happen was Saddam invading Kuwait. He was >>given an opportunity to say "oops" and pull out, he refused to take it >>instead using Kuwait as a bargaining chip to try to get the Israelis to >>pull out of Palestine. That wasn't on the table and wasn't going to be >>on the table. He was given told "remove your army from Kuwait or we >>will remove it for you", and he decided to let the coalition do the >>removing, which it promptly did. >> >>One could argue that the invasion of Kuwait was a failure of US >>diplomacy in that the US ambassador failed to make it clear to Saddam >>that if he invaded Kuwait the US would kill all of his soldiers and blow >>up all his tanks and airplanes. >> >>After Gulf War I he did not shoot missiles at anybody. The problem >>there was that after being defeated, insted of getting on with life he >>decided to play games and after a while he got the Western public >>confused over what was true, what was false, and what was a game he was >>playing, which gave Bush ample rope to hang him. >> >>Removing him was a bad thing because more people have died as a result >>of his removal than would have died if he had continued to lob his 50 >>years out of date rockets at Israel, which seemed to be treating them as >>an opportunity for trap-shooting on a grand scale. > > I think the biggest cause of the continued deaths are the remains of > Saddam's followers shooting and bombing people. You're completely wrong on that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-24 14:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.310ef3ce7ab57bc989e8c@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #157501 |
In article <ko3aab9co9pcdnpnsohf7lu7fg1hmruh2j@4ax.com>, solosam90 @gmail.com says... > > On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 07:32:05 -0500, "J. Clarke" > <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: > >In article <3beb92c8-a21f-4a6e-a52a-f2d234aec70d@googlegroups.com>, > >jsavard@ecn.ab.ca says... > >> > >> On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 12:27:26 AM UTC-7, Dave Garland wrote: > >> > >> > It's my understanding (from both news reports and Iraqis) that in > >> > Iraq, women (and religious minorities) were pretty safe before the US > >> > attacked. So how did that help? The US military made that worse, not > >> > better. > >> > >> The U.S. military may have "made things worse" in certain respects by > >> overthrowing Saddam Hussein. However, that doesn't mean they were incapable of > >> finishing the job instead of leaving chaos lying around. > >> > >> Also, this criticism overlooks the fact that even worse things *were* made > >> better by U.S. military actions. No missiles have been launched from Iraq into > >> the territory of any civilized nation since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. If > >> you will recall, missiles from Iraq *did* hit Israel during the first Gulf War. > >> > >> Thus, I find criticisms of the U.S. for overthrowing Saddam Hussein to be quite > >> bizarre. Had his missiles hit, say, Baltimore or even Sydney, the U.S. wouldn't > >> have waited until the _second_ Gulf War to overthrow Saddam Hussein. So the > >> first Gulf War should have gone to its logical conclusion: Israeli troops > >> occupying Iraq from one end to the other after its unconditional surrender. > > > >Had the US not invaded Iraq, Saddam probably would not have fired those > >missiles, so you're arguing a straw man. > > > >The reason Gulf War I had to happen was Saddam invading Kuwait. He was > >given an opportunity to say "oops" and pull out, he refused to take it > >instead using Kuwait as a bargaining chip to try to get the Israelis to > >pull out of Palestine. That wasn't on the table and wasn't going to be > >on the table. He was given told "remove your army from Kuwait or we > >will remove it for you", and he decided to let the coalition do the > >removing, which it promptly did. > > > >One could argue that the invasion of Kuwait was a failure of US > >diplomacy in that the US ambassador failed to make it clear to Saddam > >that if he invaded Kuwait the US would kill all of his soldiers and blow > >up all his tanks and airplanes. > > > >After Gulf War I he did not shoot missiles at anybody. The problem > >there was that after being defeated, insted of getting on with life he > >decided to play games and after a while he got the Western public > >confused over what was true, what was false, and what was a game he was > >playing, which gave Bush ample rope to hang him. > > > >Removing him was a bad thing because more people have died as a result > >of his removal than would have died if he had continued to lob his 50 > >years out of date rockets at Israel, which seemed to be treating them as > >an opportunity for trap-shooting on a grand scale. > > I think the biggest cause of the continued deaths are the remains of > Saddam's followers shooting and bombing people. Whatever else Saddam and the Ba'ath Party were, they were not religious fanatics, and it is the fanatics who are causing most of the problems.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 37 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 35 36 [37] 38 39 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.folklore.computers
csiph-web