Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #150208 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-23 09:17 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-08-24 08:22 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 443 — 55 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.folklore.computers
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-23 09:17 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-08-23 16:39 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-23 13:49 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-08-23 13:25 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-23 15:21 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Santo Brown" <sb8743@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 05:46 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Johnny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2015-08-23 20:41 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-08-24 09:50 +0200
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Santo Brown" <sb8743@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 20:38 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-08-24 14:48 +0200
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-24 13:20 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-24 14:04 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities lawrence@cluon.com - 2015-08-24 17:33 +0200
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Bill Cunningham" <nospan@nspam.invalid> - 2015-08-25 13:34 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Bill Cunningham" <nospan@nspam.invalid> - 2015-08-25 13:38 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-08-25 18:23 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-25 19:46 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-25 16:03 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-25 04:31 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-08-23 21:19 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Santo Brown" <sb8743@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 07:52 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-08-24 09:19 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Santo Brown" <sb8743@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 20:44 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-08-24 19:16 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-08-24 20:43 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Santo Brown" <sb8743@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 08:37 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Mike Causer <m.r.causer@goglemail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:45 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-08-24 05:24 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-08-24 11:12 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-25 04:40 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-24 16:47 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-25 08:53 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-25 10:10 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-08-25 13:36 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-25 14:58 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 14:45 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-08-26 04:03 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:37 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-25 16:19 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities pechter@S20.pechter.dyndns.org (William Pechter) - 2015-08-25 20:32 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-08-25 16:55 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-26 02:16 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-26 11:14 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-26 21:33 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-26 09:37 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-26 18:48 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-26 15:12 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-27 11:09 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-27 09:29 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-27 13:40 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-27 10:15 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-28 05:17 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-26 07:19 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-26 15:05 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2015-08-25 15:33 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-25 16:13 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-08-25 17:03 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-26 04:51 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-25 16:00 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-26 06:30 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-25 20:38 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-26 07:36 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-08-25 17:10 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-26 07:42 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-08-26 18:58 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-26 23:40 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-08-27 01:13 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-08-26 21:55 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-27 06:53 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-27 11:11 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-27 11:37 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-08-27 08:54 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-26 19:23 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-27 13:40 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-27 14:19 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2015-08-27 12:11 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-27 19:20 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-28 13:31 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-26 07:16 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-26 16:08 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-26 11:32 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-26 14:59 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-26 15:20 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-26 19:12 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 13:41 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-08-27 07:06 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-27 11:20 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-27 11:32 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-27 11:37 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-27 09:42 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-08-27 13:54 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Trog Woolley <trog@email.fake> - 2015-08-29 17:13 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-28 05:42 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-08-28 02:10 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 08:06 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-08-27 14:38 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-08-26 13:33 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-26 15:26 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-27 11:23 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-27 11:30 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-08-27 14:35 +0200
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-08-27 14:17 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-08-27 10:33 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-08-27 11:36 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-27 11:37 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Robert Swindells <rjs@fdy2.co.uk> - 2015-08-27 12:27 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-27 16:46 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Joe Makowiec <makowiec@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-27 16:10 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-27 17:49 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-27 13:40 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-27 10:17 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-27 14:21 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-08-27 14:23 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-27 15:39 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-27 09:53 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-28 05:51 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2015-09-11 18:47 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-09-12 11:23 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-12 13:24 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-28 13:31 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-28 07:54 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 19:16 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-28 12:22 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-08-28 19:48 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-29 13:41 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> - 2015-08-29 17:50 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-08-30 06:56 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-30 14:58 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 06:35 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-29 06:10 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-08-28 19:31 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 05:57 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-29 13:41 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-08-29 08:59 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-30 05:35 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-30 14:58 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-30 16:02 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-31 12:09 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-31 14:48 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-08-31 10:03 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-08-31 10:07 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-08-31 17:30 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-08-31 11:26 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-31 18:53 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-08-31 20:11 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-08-31 14:22 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-31 18:53 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-08-31 12:21 -0700
Response time Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2015-09-15 17:23 -0400
Re: Response time Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-09-15 22:30 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Gerard Schildberger <gerard46@rrt.net> - 2015-08-31 16:20 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-01 12:50 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 05:19 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 04:59 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2015-09-15 16:19 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-16 12:54 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Gerard Schildberger <gerard46@rrt.net> - 2015-08-30 10:41 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2015-09-16 13:01 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-09-17 08:29 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 06:38 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-29 04:54 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-29 13:41 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 06:11 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-28 05:19 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-28 13:31 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-29 04:43 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-27 09:39 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-27 18:09 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-27 13:51 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-28 08:40 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-08-29 14:54 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 20:12 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-08-29 15:21 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-29 19:30 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-29 22:10 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 05:22 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-30 06:51 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-30 14:58 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-30 16:02 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-30 14:06 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-31 06:43 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-09-02 15:03 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-09-02 14:02 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2015-09-02 22:46 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-09-03 09:36 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-09-03 07:29 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-09-03 20:01 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-09-03 13:25 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-03 21:53 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) - 2015-09-04 10:58 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-09-04 18:17 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-09-03 15:41 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-09-08 10:28 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-09-09 00:39 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2015-09-08 20:56 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2015-09-24 13:02 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-25 12:59 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Greymaus <mausg@mail.com> - 2015-09-09 10:12 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities simon@twoplaces.co.uk (Simon Turner) - 2015-09-10 08:35 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 18:26 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 18:27 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 18:28 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-09-09 07:02 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) - 2015-09-09 14:40 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-09-09 07:02 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-09-09 15:41 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Morten Reistad <first@last.name> - 2015-09-09 17:59 +0200
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-09-10 11:17 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-30 16:42 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-09-02 14:56 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 17:25 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-08-31 13:48 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-31 13:51 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-31 18:17 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-31 16:04 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-31 19:12 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-08-31 13:42 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-31 18:53 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2015-09-28 12:21 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-29 12:32 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2015-09-30 15:34 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> - 2015-10-01 01:38 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hankvc@blackhole.lostwells.org (Hank) - 2015-10-01 16:27 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2015-10-01 15:21 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) - 2015-10-02 03:34 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-10-02 13:11 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-10-02 13:11 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-10-02 07:32 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2015-10-02 13:46 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-10-02 13:09 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2015-10-06 19:44 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-08-31 19:10 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-31 20:09 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-08-31 21:00 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-31 12:15 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-31 20:31 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-31 19:41 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-08-31 22:04 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-09-01 18:46 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-09-01 15:38 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-09-02 08:13 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-09-03 00:17 +0200
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-09-02 08:10 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-09-02 08:05 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-26 21:21 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-27 05:42 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-08-27 08:59 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-27 10:02 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-08-25 16:49 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-26 02:15 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-08-27 15:35 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-24 23:09 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-25 09:43 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-25 06:55 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-25 17:19 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-25 09:10 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-25 19:23 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-25 11:26 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-26 04:43 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-24 15:01 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-08-24 16:22 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2015-08-25 15:39 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-08-25 17:18 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2015-08-31 20:38 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-25 08:35 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2015-08-25 15:37 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-25 16:27 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-26 07:36 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-08-25 17:32 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-24 16:52 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-25 10:16 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-08-26 04:03 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-24 12:22 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-25 08:41 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 18:47 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-23 15:16 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-23 17:18 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-08-23 21:20 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-23 17:31 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-08-24 09:55 +0200
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Santo Brown" <sb8743@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 07:53 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-08-24 09:18 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-24 01:17 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-08-24 10:28 +0200
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-24 12:40 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-08-24 13:18 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 04:34 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-08-23 22:39 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-08-24 09:16 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2015-08-24 10:34 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Greymaus <mausg@mail.com> - 2015-08-24 10:58 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2015-08-24 13:04 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-24 14:09 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-08-24 14:52 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-24 16:41 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-08-24 19:29 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities wje@acm.org (Bill Evans) - 2015-08-24 15:32 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2015-08-25 07:16 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2015-10-07 18:38 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 19:26 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-10-08 08:46 +0200
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-10-08 21:50 +0200
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-09 13:28 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-09 10:25 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-10-09 18:07 +0300
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-09 11:24 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-10-09 10:55 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-09 12:18 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2015-10-09 20:49 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-10-09 16:42 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-09 15:45 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2015-10-09 17:32 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Greymaus <mausg@mail.com> - 2015-10-09 19:20 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-09 19:32 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-09 15:36 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-10-09 20:56 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-10-10 16:21 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2015-10-09 17:51 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-10-09 22:51 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-10-09 22:55 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2015-10-10 04:27 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-10 09:57 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2015-10-10 17:09 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-10-10 13:57 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-10-10 18:05 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-10 00:30 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-10-10 09:01 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities wje@acm.org (Bill Evans) - 2015-10-10 03:38 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-10-10 11:22 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-10-10 18:13 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-10-10 23:57 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-10 09:24 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-10 11:33 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-10-10 20:20 +0300
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-10 15:22 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-10-11 09:39 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-11 13:23 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities andrew@cucumber.demon.co.uk (Andrew Gabriel) - 2015-10-11 17:56 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-11 14:18 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities wje@acm.org (Bill Evans) - 2015-10-11 12:24 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-10-12 00:06 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities andrew@cucumber.demon.co.uk (Andrew Gabriel) - 2015-10-12 07:17 +0000
OT: systemd (was: [Poll] Computing favorities) wje@acm.org (Bill Evans) - 2015-10-10 10:44 -0700
Re: OT: systemd Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-10 15:29 -0400
Re: OT: systemd Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-10-10 22:31 +0300
Re: OT: systemd Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-10-11 09:41 +0100
OT: Wayland (was: systemd) wje@acm.org (Bill Evans) - 2015-10-11 09:06 -0700
Re: OT: Wayland Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-11 13:31 -0400
Re: OT: Wayland wje@acm.org (Bill Evans) - 2015-10-11 10:36 -0700
Re: OT: Wayland Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-11 14:15 -0400
Re: OT: Wayland Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-10-11 19:53 -0300
Re: OT: Wayland Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-12 02:45 +0200
Re: OT: Wayland Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-11 22:43 -0400
Re: OT: Wayland Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-10-12 02:58 -0300
Re: OT: Wayland Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-10-12 08:34 +0100
Re: OT: Wayland Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-12 08:28 -0400
Re: OT: Wayland Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-10-13 00:58 -0300
Re: OT: Wayland scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-13 13:21 +0000
Re: OT: Wayland Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-10-13 14:07 +0000
Re: OT: Wayland Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-10-13 16:55 +0100
Re: OT: Wayland Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-10-13 13:24 -0300
Re: OT: Wayland scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-13 17:43 +0000
Re: OT: Wayland Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-13 16:09 -0400
Re: OT: Wayland scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-14 13:07 +0000
Re: OT: Wayland Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-14 09:20 -0400
Re: OT: Wayland scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-14 14:26 +0000
Re: OT: Wayland Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-10-14 16:41 +0200
Re: OT: Wayland scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-14 15:50 +0000
Re: OT: Wayland Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-14 10:47 -0400
Re: OT: Wayland scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-14 15:52 +0000
Re: OT: Wayland Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-14 12:59 -0400
Re: OT: Wayland Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2015-10-14 14:45 +0100
Re: OT: Wayland scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-14 14:32 +0000
Re: OT: Wayland Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2015-10-12 13:05 +0100
Re: OT: Wayland Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-12 08:31 -0400
Re: OT: Wayland Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2015-10-12 13:38 +0100
Re: OT: Wayland Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-10-12 16:41 +0000
Re: OT: Wayland Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-12 18:15 +0200
Re: OT: Wayland Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-10-12 05:24 +0000
Re: OT: Wayland Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-10-12 00:19 +0300
Re: OT: Wayland Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-11 21:46 +0000
Re: OT: systemd Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-11 13:24 -0400
Re: OT: systemd Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-10-12 00:25 +0300
Re: OT: systemd Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-11 18:37 -0400
Re: OT: systemd (was: [Poll] Computing favorities) Greymaus <mausg@mail.com> - 2015-10-10 19:38 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-10-10 18:08 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities andrew@cucumber.demon.co.uk (Andrew Gabriel) - 2015-10-11 17:31 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-10 11:23 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2015-10-10 17:34 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2015-10-10 19:28 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-10-11 07:12 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-10-10 19:45 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-10-10 07:12 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities wje@acm.org (Bill Evans) - 2015-10-10 00:39 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-10 09:16 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-10-10 10:11 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-10-10 18:21 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-10-11 10:55 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-10-11 04:45 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "John E. Davis" <jed@jedsoft.org> - 2015-10-12 17:53 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-10-10 18:01 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-10-10 23:57 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-09 15:03 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-09 15:46 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-09 16:30 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-09 18:15 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-09 18:57 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-09 20:15 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities wje@acm.org (Bill Evans) - 2015-10-09 15:09 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-10-09 20:52 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-10-08 21:17 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-10-08 12:07 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 13:15 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-10-08 05:14 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-08 13:06 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-10-08 12:29 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-10-08 12:44 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-10-08 15:37 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2015-10-08 19:19 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-10-09 06:26 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-10-09 16:40 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-10-09 16:14 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-10-09 16:46 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-24 07:29 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-24 13:20 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-24 12:10 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 00:06 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Santo Brown" <sb8743@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 13:02 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-23 23:35 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2015-10-07 12:19 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Bill Cunningham" <nospan@nspam.invalid> - 2015-08-23 15:27 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-24 01:17 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Santo Brown" <sb8743@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 13:10 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-08-24 16:28 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-08-24 16:27 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Santo Brown" <sb8743@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 05:48 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-23 21:32 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Santo Brown" <sb8743@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 07:57 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 00:00 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-08-23 21:18 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-08-23 11:31 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-08-23 12:08 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-08-24 08:22 -0700
Page 19 of 23 — ← Prev page 1 … 17 18 [19] 20 21 … 23 Next page →
| From | Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-13 13:24 -0300 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Wayland |
| Message-ID | <8737xeag9q.fsf@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> |
| In reply to | #152793 |
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:
> I still use TWM. I don't see the "huge, real-estate sucking icons"...
Okay. I haven't figured out how to employ the twm variable that
shouls fix it:
ForceIcons
This variable indicates that icon pixmaps specified in the
Icons variable should override any client-supplied pixmaps.
or locate what twm uses for its default pixmap -- plain rectangle with
window name in it. We're coming up on cold rain and mud season so
I'll soon get back to trying to muddle this out.
> but I use the Icon manager which simply keeps a list of windows on the left
> side of the screen.
I rarely use the Icon manager; it's posible to end up with an icon
completely off the screen/viewport/desktop and then the Icon manager
is the the only way to get back to the associated window.
--
Mike Spencer Nova Scotia, Canada
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-13 17:43 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Wayland |
| Message-ID | <TobTx.25$Ey2.16@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #152811 |
Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> writes: > >scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: > >> I still use TWM. I don't see the "huge, real-estate sucking icons"... > >Okay. I haven't figured out how to employ the twm variable that >shouls fix it: > > ForceIcons > This variable indicates that icon pixmaps specified in the > Icons variable should override any client-supplied pixmaps. I believe this takes a list of window names to which it applies. The problem is figuring out the window name for the application you wish to override. >or locate what twm uses for its default pixmap -- plain rectangle with >window name in it. We're coming up on cold rain and mud season so >I'll soon get back to trying to muddle this out. > >> but I use the Icon manager which simply keeps a list of windows on the left >> side of the screen. > >I rarely use the Icon manager; it's posible to end up with an icon >completely off the screen/viewport/desktop and then the Icon manager >is the the only way to get back to the associated window. I think Icons are useless, myself, so I use the IconManager (which provides a simple text button for each window). Click once to Iconify, click a second time to uniconify.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-13 16:09 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Wayland |
| Message-ID | <mvjo9s$g5e$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #152816 |
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: > Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> writes: >> >>scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: >> >>> I still use TWM. I don't see the "huge, real-estate sucking icons"... >> >>Okay. I haven't figured out how to employ the twm variable that >>shouls fix it: >> >> ForceIcons >> This variable indicates that icon pixmaps specified in the >> Icons variable should override any client-supplied pixmaps. > > I believe this takes a list of window names to which it applies. > > The problem is figuring out the window name for the application you > wish to override. In fvwm you can match using the X name, class or resource. The module FvwmIdent will tell you the name class or resource for any window. Lacking that, try xwininfo. >>or locate what twm uses for its default pixmap -- plain rectangle with >>window name in it. We're coming up on cold rain and mud season so >>I'll soon get back to trying to muddle this out. >> >>> but I use the Icon manager which simply keeps a list of windows on the left >>> side of the screen. >> >>I rarely use the Icon manager; it's posible to end up with an icon >>completely off the screen/viewport/desktop and then the Icon manager >>is the the only way to get back to the associated window. > > I think Icons are useless, myself, so I use the IconManager (which > provides a simple text button for each window). Click once to Iconify, > click a second time to uniconify. So, you have icons, they're just captured in a box. Well, they're not quite icons, because they stay in the box even when the window is not minimized. For me, that's useless because I use key bindings to minimize windows. Fvwm allows you to define one or more areas of the screen to use as invisible boxes (IconBoxes). Mine run down the right (under the clock, perfmeter, and mail indicator. When that fills, they run across the bottom starting on the right. (The main box almost never fills.) -- Dan Espen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-14 13:07 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Wayland |
| Message-ID | <IssTx.17671$jK7.2397@fx08.iad> |
| In reply to | #152834 |
Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes: >scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: >> I think Icons are useless, myself, so I use the IconManager (which >> provides a simple text button for each window). Click once to Iconify, >> click a second time to uniconify. > >So, you have icons, they're just captured in a box. Actually, no, I don't have any icons. All that is in the box is a set of label widgets with text (the window name) labels. Considering that of the 45 or so open windows on my dual-head setup, 30 are xterm windows, using a graphical icon would be silly.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-14 09:20 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Wayland |
| Message-ID | <mvlkn2$ig9$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #152880 |
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: > Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes: >>scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: > >>> I think Icons are useless, myself, so I use the IconManager (which >>> provides a simple text button for each window). Click once to Iconify, >>> click a second time to uniconify. >> >>So, you have icons, they're just captured in a box. > > Actually, no, I don't have any icons. All that is in the > box is a set of label widgets with text (the window name) labels. > > Considering that of the 45 or so open windows on my dual-head > setup, 30 are xterm windows, using a graphical icon would be > silly. In Fvwm, icons have images and labels by default. You can turn off the label or you can turn off the image. Hence, I tend to think of icons as just something somewhere that represents a window. That's a lot of windows. -- Dan Espen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-14 14:26 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Wayland |
| Message-ID | <ICtTx.16766$Y%4.7861@fx28.iad> |
| In reply to | #152883 |
Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes: >scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: > >> Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes: >>>scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: >> >>>> I think Icons are useless, myself, so I use the IconManager (which >>>> provides a simple text button for each window). Click once to Iconify, >>>> click a second time to uniconify. >>> >>>So, you have icons, they're just captured in a box. >> >> Actually, no, I don't have any icons. All that is in the >> box is a set of label widgets with text (the window name) labels. >> >> Considering that of the 45 or so open windows on my dual-head >> setup, 30 are xterm windows, using a graphical icon would be >> silly. > >In Fvwm, icons have images and labels by default. >You can turn off the label or you can turn off the image. >Hence, I tend to think of icons as just something somewhere >that represents a window. > >That's a lot of windows. $ uptime 10:22:13 up 74 days, 21:37, 431 users, load average: 2.10, 1.87, 1.73 I have a root window, a half-dozen xpdf windows (processor specs, hardware reference manuals, design documents), two xterms per active source tree (with four distinct branches in use for various reasons), one for linux source, one for firmware source, one for a third-party test-suite source, a couple ssh sessions to other hosts and a couple of gvim windows.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-14 16:41 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Wayland |
| Message-ID | <4562fc-8v5.ln1@sambook.reistad.name> |
| In reply to | #152897 |
In article <ICtTx.16766$Y%4.7861@fx28.iad>,
Scott Lurndal <slp53@pacbell.net> wrote:
>Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes:
>>scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:
>>
>>> Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes:
>>>>scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:
>>>
>>>>> I think Icons are useless, myself, so I use the IconManager (which
>>>>> provides a simple text button for each window). Click once to Iconify,
>>>>> click a second time to uniconify.
>>>>
>>>>So, you have icons, they're just captured in a box.
>>>
>>> Actually, no, I don't have any icons. All that is in the
>>> box is a set of label widgets with text (the window name) labels.
>>>
>>> Considering that of the 45 or so open windows on my dual-head
>>> setup, 30 are xterm windows, using a graphical icon would be
>>> silly.
>>
>>In Fvwm, icons have images and labels by default.
>>You can turn off the label or you can turn off the image.
>>Hence, I tend to think of icons as just something somewhere
>>that represents a window.
>>
>>That's a lot of windows.
>
>$ uptime
> 10:22:13 up 74 days, 21:37, 431 users, load average: 2.10, 1.87, 1.73
^^^
that is around 15 times as many as I have on my ditto server, with around
the same setup as below. You either have killed the X server without
having it die completely a few times, have lots of guests from the net,
or you have a LOT more running than what you describe below.
>
>I have a root window, a half-dozen xpdf windows (processor specs,
>hardware reference manuals, design documents), two xterms per active
>source tree (with four distinct branches in use for various reasons), one
>for linux source, one for firmware source, one for a third-party
>test-suite source, a couple ssh sessions to other hosts and a couple of gvim windows.
-- mrr
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-14 15:50 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Wayland |
| Message-ID | <8RuTx.5135$CG1.1891@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #152900 |
Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> writes: >In article <ICtTx.16766$Y%4.7861@fx28.iad>, >Scott Lurndal <slp53@pacbell.net> wrote: >>Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes: >>>scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: >>> >>>> Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes: >>>>>scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: >>>> >>>>>> I think Icons are useless, myself, so I use the IconManager (which >>>>>> provides a simple text button for each window). Click once to Iconify, >>>>>> click a second time to uniconify. >>>>> >>>>>So, you have icons, they're just captured in a box. >>>> >>>> Actually, no, I don't have any icons. All that is in the >>>> box is a set of label widgets with text (the window name) labels. >>>> >>>> Considering that of the 45 or so open windows on my dual-head >>>> setup, 30 are xterm windows, using a graphical icon would be >>>> silly. >>> >>>In Fvwm, icons have images and labels by default. >>>You can turn off the label or you can turn off the image. >>>Hence, I tend to think of icons as just something somewhere >>>that represents a window. >>> >>>That's a lot of windows. >> >>$ uptime >> 10:22:13 up 74 days, 21:37, 431 users, load average: 2.10, 1.87, 1.73 Actually, I pulled that accidentally from an (east coast) shared host, which really does have that many users on it. My host is: $ uptime 08:45:55 up 231 days, 17:45, 33 users, load average: 0.00, 0.05, 0.10 Much more reasonable. > ^^^ > >that is around 15 times as many as I have on my ditto server, with around >the same setup as below. You either have killed the X server without >having it die completely a few times, have lots of guests from the net, >or you have a LOT more running than what you describe below. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-14 10:47 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Wayland |
| Message-ID | <mvlppu$7j5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #152897 |
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: > Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes: >>scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: >> >>> Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes: >>>>scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: >>> >>>>> I think Icons are useless, myself, so I use the IconManager (which >>>>> provides a simple text button for each window). Click once to Iconify, >>>>> click a second time to uniconify. >>>> >>>>So, you have icons, they're just captured in a box. >>> >>> Actually, no, I don't have any icons. All that is in the >>> box is a set of label widgets with text (the window name) labels. >>> >>> Considering that of the 45 or so open windows on my dual-head >>> setup, 30 are xterm windows, using a graphical icon would be >>> silly. >> >>In Fvwm, icons have images and labels by default. >>You can turn off the label or you can turn off the image. >>Hence, I tend to think of icons as just something somewhere >>that represents a window. >> >>That's a lot of windows. > > $ uptime > 10:22:13 up 74 days, 21:37, 431 users, load average: 2.10, 1.87, 1.73 > > I have a root window, a half-dozen xpdf windows (processor specs, > hardware reference manuals, design documents), two xterms per active > source tree (with four distinct branches in use for various reasons), one > for linux source, one for firmware source, one for a third-party > test-suite source, a couple ssh sessions to other hosts and a couple of gvim windows. I attribute my relative lack of open windows to using Emacs. No need to switch from an edit window to a compile window to a test window. -- Dan Espen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-14 15:52 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Wayland |
| Message-ID | <XSuTx.5169$CG1.417@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #152901 |
Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes: >scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: > >> Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes: >>>scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: >>> >>>> Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes: >>>>>scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: >>>> >>>>>> I think Icons are useless, myself, so I use the IconManager (which >>>>>> provides a simple text button for each window). Click once to Iconify, >>>>>> click a second time to uniconify. >>>>> >>>>>So, you have icons, they're just captured in a box. >>>> >>>> Actually, no, I don't have any icons. All that is in the >>>> box is a set of label widgets with text (the window name) labels. >>>> >>>> Considering that of the 45 or so open windows on my dual-head >>>> setup, 30 are xterm windows, using a graphical icon would be >>>> silly. >>> >>>In Fvwm, icons have images and labels by default. >>>You can turn off the label or you can turn off the image. >>>Hence, I tend to think of icons as just something somewhere >>>that represents a window. >>> >>>That's a lot of windows. >> >> $ uptime >> 10:22:13 up 74 days, 21:37, 431 users, load average: 2.10, 1.87, 1.73 >> >> I have a root window, a half-dozen xpdf windows (processor specs, >> hardware reference manuals, design documents), two xterms per active >> source tree (with four distinct branches in use for various reasons), one >> for linux source, one for firmware source, one for a third-party >> test-suite source, a couple ssh sessions to other hosts and a couple of gvim windows. > >I attribute my relative lack of open windows to using Emacs. >No need to switch from an edit window to a compile window to a test >window. But I _want_ to see them all at the same time, I don't want to have to switch between them. That's why i have 3840x1200 pixels available across two screens. VIM now has most of the capabilities of Emacs, but I don't _want_ everything in one window.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-14 12:59 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Wayland |
| Message-ID | <mvm1gu$7on$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #152905 |
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: > Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes: >>scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: >> >>> Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes: >>>>scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: >>>> >>>>> Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes: >>>>>>scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: >>>>> >>>>>>> I think Icons are useless, myself, so I use the IconManager (which >>>>>>> provides a simple text button for each window). Click once to Iconify, >>>>>>> click a second time to uniconify. >>>>>> >>>>>>So, you have icons, they're just captured in a box. >>>>> >>>>> Actually, no, I don't have any icons. All that is in the >>>>> box is a set of label widgets with text (the window name) labels. >>>>> >>>>> Considering that of the 45 or so open windows on my dual-head >>>>> setup, 30 are xterm windows, using a graphical icon would be >>>>> silly. >>>> >>>>In Fvwm, icons have images and labels by default. >>>>You can turn off the label or you can turn off the image. >>>>Hence, I tend to think of icons as just something somewhere >>>>that represents a window. >>>> >>>>That's a lot of windows. >>> >>> $ uptime >>> 10:22:13 up 74 days, 21:37, 431 users, load average: 2.10, 1.87, 1.73 >>> >>> I have a root window, a half-dozen xpdf windows (processor specs, >>> hardware reference manuals, design documents), two xterms per active >>> source tree (with four distinct branches in use for various reasons), one >>> for linux source, one for firmware source, one for a third-party >>> test-suite source, a couple ssh sessions to other hosts and a couple of gvim windows. >> >>I attribute my relative lack of open windows to using Emacs. >>No need to switch from an edit window to a compile window to a test >>window. > > But I _want_ to see them all at the same time, I don't want to have to switch > between them. That's why i have 3840x1200 pixels available across > two screens. I go on the theory that I can only look at one thing at a time. Right now I'm at a single 1600x1200 monitor. If I had 2, I'm not sure what direction I'd go. For a while I operated a laptop and the 1600x1200 side by side. I found it way too distracting hunting down windows and shifting them around. > VIM now has most of the capabilities of Emacs, but I don't _want_ > everything in one window. Yes, I've noticed how vim gets more and more powerful. Even has a way to navigate to the lines that are in error in a compile. Not sure that it's at the same level as Emacs though. In Emacs I can find an error, correct it by adding or deleting lines and Emacs still knows where the next line in error is. Not sure if it prompts for a save before compile either. I see vim has horizontal and vertical splits too, How they retain such fast start up is a mystery though. -- Dan Espen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-14 14:45 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Wayland |
| Message-ID | <6sms1blobh6qrk4e5vvitlv1kgjn5htknc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #152880 |
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:07:52 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) wrote: >Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes: >>scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: > >>> I think Icons are useless, myself, so I use the IconManager (which >>> provides a simple text button for each window). Click once to Iconify, >>> click a second time to uniconify. >> >>So, you have icons, they're just captured in a box. > >Actually, no, I don't have any icons. All that is in the >box is a set of label widgets with text (the window name) labels. > >Considering that of the 45 or so open windows on my dual-head >setup, 30 are xterm windows, using a graphical icon would be >silly. Can't you create your own? 30 variations of the xterm default would be a challenge but I'm sure it's possible. Steve -- Neural Network Software for Windows http://www.npsnn.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-14 14:32 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Wayland |
| Message-ID | <aItTx.16768$Y%4.11266@fx28.iad> |
| In reply to | #152884 |
Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> writes:
>On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:07:52 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
>wrote:
>
>>Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes:
>>>scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:
>>
>>>> I think Icons are useless, myself, so I use the IconManager (which
>>>> provides a simple text button for each window). Click once to Iconify,
>>>> click a second time to uniconify.
>>>
>>>So, you have icons, they're just captured in a box.
>>
>>Actually, no, I don't have any icons. All that is in the
>>box is a set of label widgets with text (the window name) labels.
>>
>>Considering that of the 45 or so open windows on my dual-head
>>setup, 30 are xterm windows, using a graphical icon would be
>>silly.
>
>Can't you create your own? 30 variations of the xterm default would be
>a challenge but I'm sure it's possible.
Because I don't find graphical Icons at all useful. Take up way
too much screen real-estate and would usually be covered by open
windows anyway.
The creation must need be dynamic anyway, since the name of a window
changes throughout its life based on the activity being performed
in the window:
function Banner {
print "\033]$1;$2\007\c"
}
function buildmaster
{
Banner 1 buildmaster
ssh -Y buildmaster
Banner 1 $(uname -n)
}
function dvmm
{
...
cd ${_path}${1}/${_branch}/src
Banner 1 dvmm_${1}
break
...
}
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-12 13:05 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Wayland |
| Message-ID | <he8n1b56830ptpoaq1f4m9d9k4ir344gq1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #152717 |
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 22:43:09 -0400, Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> wrote: >Wow, great marketing speak. >What exactly is a "better desktop experience"? I met my first wife that way!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-12 08:31 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Wayland |
| Message-ID | <mvg92l$rub$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #152727 |
Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> writes: > On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 22:43:09 -0400, Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> > wrote: > >>Wow, great marketing speak. >>What exactly is a "better desktop experience"? > > I met my first wife that way! Hope it worked out. Oh, wait, first wife.... -- Dan Espen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-12 13:38 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Wayland |
| Message-ID | <k9an1bd2bjp93mqfu0t8k254t36ke9bquj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #152729 |
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:31:13 -0400, Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> wrote: >Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> writes: > >> On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 22:43:09 -0400, Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> >> wrote: >> >>>Wow, great marketing speak. >>>What exactly is a "better desktop experience"? >> >> I met my first wife that way! > >Hope it worked out. >Oh, wait, first wife.... It worked OK for eight years... Steve
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-12 16:41 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Wayland |
| Message-ID | <mvgnrp01si6@news3.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #152730 |
On 2015-10-12, Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> wrote: > On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:31:13 -0400, Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> > wrote: > >> Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> writes: >> >>> On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 22:43:09 -0400, Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Wow, great marketing speak. >>>> What exactly is a "better desktop experience"? >>> >>> I met my first wife that way! >> >> Hope it worked out. >> Oh, wait, first wife.... > > It worked OK for eight years... Well, that's a lot longer than your typical Windows release... -- /~\ cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs) \ / I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way. X Top-posted messages will probably be ignored. See RFC1855. / \ HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored. Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-12 18:15 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Wayland |
| Message-ID | <20151012181508.5f9bc34f@maxa-pc> |
| In reply to | #152717 |
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 22:43:09 -0400 Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> wrote: > Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> writes: > > > On 11 Oct 2015 19:53:16 -0300 > > Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> wrote: > > > >> > >> Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes: > >> > >> > wje@acm.org (Bill Evans) writes: > >> > > >> >> Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> For me, the Wayland deal breaker is lack of remote single > >> >>> window support. > >> >> > >> >> Oof. You mean no /etc/X0.hosts? No setting DISPLAY to the > >> >> host I just telnetted in from? That would cramp my style. > >> >> I was afraid of that, but assumed that they'd surely, surely > >> >> fix it. > >> > > >> > They seem to think remote desktop is an adequate substitute. > >> > Talk about mimicking Windows. > >> > >> Um, yeah, so what if you don't *use* a "desktop"? How does that > >> work with twm? Or how, then, do you get the bare bones simplicity > >> of twm at all? > >> > >> Don't want a "desktop", don't want all the gigs of stuff required > >> to support one, don't care about drag & drop or all the other > >> chrome (not Chrome :-). Where is Wayland going with plain and > >> simple? > > > > Wayland supports X so I guess all X applications will work remotely > > as they do usually. > > Nope. From the FAQ: > > Wayland provides a solution here, in that it can host several X > servers as they push their root window to Wayland as surfaces. > > Wayland hosts X Servers, not X applications. Of course. That doesn't change the fact that you could run remote X application and display it in Wayland.... > > > Wayland is not to replace X or obsolete it in any way. Wayland is > > for desktop users which want better desktop experience. > > Wow, great marketing speak. > What exactly is a "better desktop experience"? Wait and see. I grokked that as I can't imagine any other reason to switch to it. Is it any other?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-12 05:24 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Wayland |
| Message-ID | <d80ug2FmtpsU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #152709 |
On 2015-10-11, Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> wrote:
>
> Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes:
>
>> wje@acm.org (Bill Evans) writes:
>>
>>> Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> For me, the Wayland deal breaker is lack of remote single window
>>>> support.
>>>
>>> Oof. You mean no /etc/X0.hosts? No setting DISPLAY to the
>>> host I just telnetted in from? That would cramp my style.
>>> I was afraid of that, but assumed that they'd surely, surely
>>> fix it.
>>
>> They seem to think remote desktop is an adequate substitute.
>> Talk about mimicking Windows.
>
> Um, yeah, so what if you don't *use* a "desktop"? How does that work
> with twm? Or how, then, do you get the bare bones simplicity of twm at
> all?
>
> Don't want a "desktop", don't want all the gigs of stuff required to
> support one, don't care about drag & drop or all the other chrome (not
> Chrome :-). Where is Wayland going with plain and simple?
Plain and simple is dead. :o(
--
I don't have an attitude problem. If you have a problem with my
attitude, that's your problem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-12 00:19 +0300 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Wayland |
| Message-ID | <87fv1hqf23.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> |
| In reply to | #152692 |
wje@acm.org (Bill Evans):
> Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> wrote:
>> For me, the Wayland deal breaker is lack of remote single window
>> support.
>
> Oof. You mean no /etc/X0.hosts? No setting DISPLAY to the host I just
> telnetted in from? That would cramp my style. I was afraid of that,
> but assumed that they'd surely, surely fix it.
Nothing prevents you from creating a graphics server (X11 or some other)
on top of Wayland.
The X Protocol is too low-level to work efficiently over the network.
How about having a Qt server:
My PC Remote PC
+---------------+ +------------+
| +-----------+ | Qt Protocol | +--------+ |
| | Qt Server |<----------------------->| Qt App | |
| +-----+-----+ | | +--------+ |
| | | +------------+
| V |
| +-----------+ |
| | Wayland | |
| +-----------+ |
+---------------+
Unfortunately, I don't think that's how it's going to be done.
Marko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 19 of 23 — ← Prev page 1 … 17 18 [19] 20 21 … 23 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.folklore.computers
csiph-web