Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #150208 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-23 09:17 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-08-24 08:22 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 443 — 55 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.folklore.computers
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-23 09:17 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-08-23 16:39 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-23 13:49 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-08-23 13:25 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-23 15:21 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Santo Brown" <sb8743@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 05:46 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Johnny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2015-08-23 20:41 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-08-24 09:50 +0200
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Santo Brown" <sb8743@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 20:38 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-08-24 14:48 +0200
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-24 13:20 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-24 14:04 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities lawrence@cluon.com - 2015-08-24 17:33 +0200
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Bill Cunningham" <nospan@nspam.invalid> - 2015-08-25 13:34 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Bill Cunningham" <nospan@nspam.invalid> - 2015-08-25 13:38 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-08-25 18:23 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-25 19:46 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-25 16:03 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-25 04:31 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-08-23 21:19 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Santo Brown" <sb8743@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 07:52 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-08-24 09:19 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Santo Brown" <sb8743@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 20:44 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-08-24 19:16 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-08-24 20:43 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Santo Brown" <sb8743@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 08:37 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Mike Causer <m.r.causer@goglemail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:45 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-08-24 05:24 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-08-24 11:12 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-25 04:40 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-24 16:47 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-25 08:53 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-25 10:10 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-08-25 13:36 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-25 14:58 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 14:45 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-08-26 04:03 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:37 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-25 16:19 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities pechter@S20.pechter.dyndns.org (William Pechter) - 2015-08-25 20:32 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-08-25 16:55 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-26 02:16 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-26 11:14 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-26 21:33 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-26 09:37 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-26 18:48 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-26 15:12 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-27 11:09 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-27 09:29 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-27 13:40 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-27 10:15 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-28 05:17 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-26 07:19 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-26 15:05 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2015-08-25 15:33 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-25 16:13 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-08-25 17:03 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-26 04:51 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-25 16:00 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-26 06:30 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-25 20:38 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-26 07:36 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-08-25 17:10 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-26 07:42 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-08-26 18:58 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-26 23:40 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-08-27 01:13 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-08-26 21:55 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-27 06:53 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-27 11:11 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-27 11:37 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-08-27 08:54 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-26 19:23 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-27 13:40 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-27 14:19 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2015-08-27 12:11 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-27 19:20 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-28 13:31 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-26 07:16 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-26 16:08 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-26 11:32 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-26 14:59 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-26 15:20 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-26 19:12 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 13:41 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-08-27 07:06 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-27 11:20 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-27 11:32 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-27 11:37 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-27 09:42 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-08-27 13:54 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Trog Woolley <trog@email.fake> - 2015-08-29 17:13 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-28 05:42 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-08-28 02:10 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 08:06 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-08-27 14:38 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-08-26 13:33 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-26 15:26 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-27 11:23 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-27 11:30 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-08-27 14:35 +0200
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-08-27 14:17 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-08-27 10:33 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-08-27 11:36 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-27 11:37 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Robert Swindells <rjs@fdy2.co.uk> - 2015-08-27 12:27 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-27 16:46 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Joe Makowiec <makowiec@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-27 16:10 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-27 17:49 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-27 13:40 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-27 10:17 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-27 14:21 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-08-27 14:23 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-27 15:39 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-27 09:53 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-28 05:51 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2015-09-11 18:47 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-09-12 11:23 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-12 13:24 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-28 13:31 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-28 07:54 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 19:16 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-28 12:22 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-08-28 19:48 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-29 13:41 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> - 2015-08-29 17:50 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-08-30 06:56 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-30 14:58 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 06:35 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-29 06:10 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-08-28 19:31 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 05:57 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-29 13:41 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-08-29 08:59 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-30 05:35 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-30 14:58 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-30 16:02 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-31 12:09 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-31 14:48 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-08-31 10:03 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-08-31 10:07 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-08-31 17:30 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-08-31 11:26 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-31 18:53 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-08-31 20:11 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-08-31 14:22 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-31 18:53 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-08-31 12:21 -0700
Response time Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2015-09-15 17:23 -0400
Re: Response time Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-09-15 22:30 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Gerard Schildberger <gerard46@rrt.net> - 2015-08-31 16:20 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-01 12:50 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 05:19 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 04:59 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2015-09-15 16:19 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-16 12:54 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Gerard Schildberger <gerard46@rrt.net> - 2015-08-30 10:41 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2015-09-16 13:01 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-09-17 08:29 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 06:38 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-29 04:54 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-29 13:41 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 06:11 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-28 05:19 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-28 13:31 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-29 04:43 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-27 09:39 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-27 18:09 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-27 13:51 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-28 08:40 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-08-29 14:54 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 20:12 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-08-29 15:21 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-29 19:30 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-29 22:10 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 05:22 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-30 06:51 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-30 14:58 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-30 16:02 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-30 14:06 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-31 06:43 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-09-02 15:03 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-09-02 14:02 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2015-09-02 22:46 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-09-03 09:36 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-09-03 07:29 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-09-03 20:01 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-09-03 13:25 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-03 21:53 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) - 2015-09-04 10:58 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-09-04 18:17 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-09-03 15:41 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-09-08 10:28 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-09-09 00:39 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2015-09-08 20:56 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2015-09-24 13:02 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-25 12:59 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Greymaus <mausg@mail.com> - 2015-09-09 10:12 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities simon@twoplaces.co.uk (Simon Turner) - 2015-09-10 08:35 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 18:26 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 18:27 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 18:28 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-09-09 07:02 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) - 2015-09-09 14:40 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-09-09 07:02 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-09-09 15:41 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Morten Reistad <first@last.name> - 2015-09-09 17:59 +0200
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-09-10 11:17 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-30 16:42 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-09-02 14:56 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 17:25 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-08-31 13:48 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-31 13:51 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-31 18:17 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-31 16:04 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-31 19:12 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-08-31 13:42 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-31 18:53 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2015-09-28 12:21 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-29 12:32 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2015-09-30 15:34 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> - 2015-10-01 01:38 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hankvc@blackhole.lostwells.org (Hank) - 2015-10-01 16:27 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2015-10-01 15:21 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) - 2015-10-02 03:34 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-10-02 13:11 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-10-02 13:11 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-10-02 07:32 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2015-10-02 13:46 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-10-02 13:09 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2015-10-06 19:44 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-08-31 19:10 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-31 20:09 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-08-31 21:00 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-31 12:15 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-31 20:31 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-31 19:41 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-08-31 22:04 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-09-01 18:46 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-09-01 15:38 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-09-02 08:13 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-09-03 00:17 +0200
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-09-02 08:10 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-09-02 08:05 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-26 21:21 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-27 05:42 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-08-27 08:59 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-27 10:02 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-08-25 16:49 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-26 02:15 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-08-27 15:35 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-24 23:09 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-25 09:43 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-25 06:55 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-25 17:19 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-25 09:10 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-25 19:23 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-25 11:26 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-26 04:43 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-24 15:01 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-08-24 16:22 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2015-08-25 15:39 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-08-25 17:18 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2015-08-31 20:38 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-25 08:35 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2015-08-25 15:37 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-25 16:27 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-26 07:36 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-08-25 17:32 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-08-24 16:52 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-25 10:16 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-08-26 04:03 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-08-24 12:22 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "hqhy" <hqhy@nospam.com> - 2015-08-25 08:41 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 18:47 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-23 15:16 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-23 17:18 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-08-23 21:20 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-23 17:31 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-08-24 09:55 +0200
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Santo Brown" <sb8743@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 07:53 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-08-24 09:18 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-24 01:17 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-08-24 10:28 +0200
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-08-24 12:40 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-08-24 13:18 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 04:34 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-08-23 22:39 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-08-24 09:16 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2015-08-24 10:34 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Greymaus <mausg@mail.com> - 2015-08-24 10:58 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2015-08-24 13:04 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-24 14:09 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-08-24 14:52 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-08-24 16:41 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-08-24 19:29 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities wje@acm.org (Bill Evans) - 2015-08-24 15:32 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2015-08-25 07:16 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2015-10-07 18:38 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 19:26 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-10-08 08:46 +0200
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-10-08 21:50 +0200
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-09 13:28 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-09 10:25 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-10-09 18:07 +0300
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-09 11:24 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-10-09 10:55 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-09 12:18 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2015-10-09 20:49 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-10-09 16:42 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-09 15:45 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2015-10-09 17:32 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Greymaus <mausg@mail.com> - 2015-10-09 19:20 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-09 19:32 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-09 15:36 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-10-09 20:56 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-10-10 16:21 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2015-10-09 17:51 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-10-09 22:51 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-10-09 22:55 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2015-10-10 04:27 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-10 09:57 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2015-10-10 17:09 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-10-10 13:57 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-10-10 18:05 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-10 00:30 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-10-10 09:01 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities wje@acm.org (Bill Evans) - 2015-10-10 03:38 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-10-10 11:22 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-10-10 18:13 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-10-10 23:57 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-10 09:24 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-10 11:33 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-10-10 20:20 +0300
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-10 15:22 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-10-11 09:39 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-11 13:23 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities andrew@cucumber.demon.co.uk (Andrew Gabriel) - 2015-10-11 17:56 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-11 14:18 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities wje@acm.org (Bill Evans) - 2015-10-11 12:24 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-10-12 00:06 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities andrew@cucumber.demon.co.uk (Andrew Gabriel) - 2015-10-12 07:17 +0000
OT: systemd (was: [Poll] Computing favorities) wje@acm.org (Bill Evans) - 2015-10-10 10:44 -0700
Re: OT: systemd Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-10 15:29 -0400
Re: OT: systemd Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-10-10 22:31 +0300
Re: OT: systemd Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-10-11 09:41 +0100
OT: Wayland (was: systemd) wje@acm.org (Bill Evans) - 2015-10-11 09:06 -0700
Re: OT: Wayland Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-11 13:31 -0400
Re: OT: Wayland wje@acm.org (Bill Evans) - 2015-10-11 10:36 -0700
Re: OT: Wayland Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-11 14:15 -0400
Re: OT: Wayland Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-10-11 19:53 -0300
Re: OT: Wayland Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-12 02:45 +0200
Re: OT: Wayland Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-11 22:43 -0400
Re: OT: Wayland Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-10-12 02:58 -0300
Re: OT: Wayland Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-10-12 08:34 +0100
Re: OT: Wayland Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-12 08:28 -0400
Re: OT: Wayland Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-10-13 00:58 -0300
Re: OT: Wayland scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-13 13:21 +0000
Re: OT: Wayland Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-10-13 14:07 +0000
Re: OT: Wayland Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-10-13 16:55 +0100
Re: OT: Wayland Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-10-13 13:24 -0300
Re: OT: Wayland scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-13 17:43 +0000
Re: OT: Wayland Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-13 16:09 -0400
Re: OT: Wayland scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-14 13:07 +0000
Re: OT: Wayland Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-14 09:20 -0400
Re: OT: Wayland scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-14 14:26 +0000
Re: OT: Wayland Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-10-14 16:41 +0200
Re: OT: Wayland scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-14 15:50 +0000
Re: OT: Wayland Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-14 10:47 -0400
Re: OT: Wayland scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-14 15:52 +0000
Re: OT: Wayland Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-14 12:59 -0400
Re: OT: Wayland Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2015-10-14 14:45 +0100
Re: OT: Wayland scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-14 14:32 +0000
Re: OT: Wayland Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2015-10-12 13:05 +0100
Re: OT: Wayland Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-12 08:31 -0400
Re: OT: Wayland Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2015-10-12 13:38 +0100
Re: OT: Wayland Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-10-12 16:41 +0000
Re: OT: Wayland Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-12 18:15 +0200
Re: OT: Wayland Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-10-12 05:24 +0000
Re: OT: Wayland Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-10-12 00:19 +0300
Re: OT: Wayland Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-11 21:46 +0000
Re: OT: systemd Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-11 13:24 -0400
Re: OT: systemd Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-10-12 00:25 +0300
Re: OT: systemd Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-11 18:37 -0400
Re: OT: systemd (was: [Poll] Computing favorities) Greymaus <mausg@mail.com> - 2015-10-10 19:38 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-10-10 18:08 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities andrew@cucumber.demon.co.uk (Andrew Gabriel) - 2015-10-11 17:31 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-10-10 11:23 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2015-10-10 17:34 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2015-10-10 19:28 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-10-11 07:12 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-10-10 19:45 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-10-10 07:12 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities wje@acm.org (Bill Evans) - 2015-10-10 00:39 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-10 09:16 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-10-10 10:11 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-10-10 18:21 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-10-11 10:55 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-10-11 04:45 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "John E. Davis" <jed@jedsoft.org> - 2015-10-12 17:53 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-10-10 18:01 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-10-10 23:57 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-09 15:03 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-09 15:46 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-09 16:30 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-09 18:15 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-09 18:57 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-09 20:15 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities wje@acm.org (Bill Evans) - 2015-10-09 15:09 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-10-09 20:52 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-10-08 21:17 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-10-08 12:07 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 13:15 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-10-08 05:14 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-08 13:06 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-10-08 12:29 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-10-08 12:44 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-10-08 15:37 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2015-10-08 19:19 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-10-09 06:26 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-10-09 16:40 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-10-09 16:14 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-10-09 16:46 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-24 07:29 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-24 13:20 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-24 12:10 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 00:06 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Santo Brown" <sb8743@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 13:02 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-08-23 23:35 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2015-10-07 12:19 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Bill Cunningham" <nospan@nspam.invalid> - 2015-08-23 15:27 -0400
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-24 01:17 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Santo Brown" <sb8743@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 13:10 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-08-24 16:28 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-08-24 16:27 -0500
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Santo Brown" <sb8743@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 05:48 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-08-23 21:32 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities "Santo Brown" <sb8743@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 07:57 +1000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 00:00 +0100
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-08-23 21:18 +0000
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-08-23 11:31 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-08-23 12:08 -0700
Re: [Poll] Computing favorities Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-08-24 08:22 -0700
Page 21 of 23 — ← Prev page 1 … 19 20 [21] 22 23 Next page →
| From | "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-10 18:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mvc58p$pf4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #152599 |
"Bob Eager" <news0005@eager.cx> wrote in message news:d7quobFhvhhU14@mid.individual.net... > On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 17:51:17 -0400, Roberto Waltman wrote: > >> Greymaus wrote: >> >>> AFAIremember, forth used RPN > > A Forth program runs every time I boot this machine... Are you referring to OpenGL??? -- numerist at aquaporin4 dot com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-10 23:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d7tmvgFhvhhU24@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #152654 |
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 18:01:39 -0500, Charles Richmond wrote: > "Bob Eager" <news0005@eager.cx> wrote in message > news:d7quobFhvhhU14@mid.individual.net... >> On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 17:51:17 -0400, Roberto Waltman wrote: >> >>> Greymaus wrote: >>> >>>> AFAIremember, forth used RPN >> >> A Forth program runs every time I boot this machine... > > Are you referring to OpenGL??? No, the loader. -- Using UNIX since v6 (1975)... Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 15:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mv8kvr$8af$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #152542 |
In comp.misc Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote: > Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> writes: > >In article <SrWdnQTD4_3OX4vLnZ2dnUU7-ImdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> wrote: > >>Morten Reistad wrote: > >> > >> > >>> I still use unix' dc as my preferred quick calculator. I can paste > >>> numbers into it, and it works the way my brain thinks. > >>Linux (and probably a lot of other Un**-derived systems) can have grpn (or > >>rpn). general RPN calculator for X screens, with dec-hex-octal conversion, > >>too. That's my favorite. > > > >I needed to test that. So ein ding muss ich auch haben. > > > >mrr@xu3:~$ sudo apt-get install grpn > >[sudo] password for mrr: > >Reading package lists... Done > >Building dependency tree > >Reading state information... Done > Well, not _all_ linux: > # yum install grpn > Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, refresh-packagekit, security > Setting up Install Process > No package grpn available. > Error: Nothing to do > sigh. Just build from source. Here is the Slackbuilds script for grpn for Slackware: http://slackbuilds.org/repository/14.1/academic/grpn/?search=grpn
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 15:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <3jRRx.74813$Rj5.15314@fx02.iad> |
| In reply to | #152544 |
Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes: >In comp.misc Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote: >> Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> writes: >> >In article <SrWdnQTD4_3OX4vLnZ2dnUU7-ImdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> >Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> wrote: >> >>Morten Reistad wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> I still use unix' dc as my preferred quick calculator. I can paste >> >>> numbers into it, and it works the way my brain thinks. >> >>Linux (and probably a lot of other Un**-derived systems) can have grpn (or >> >>rpn). general RPN calculator for X screens, with dec-hex-octal conversion, >> >>too. That's my favorite. >> > >> >I needed to test that. So ein ding muss ich auch haben. >> > >> >mrr@xu3:~$ sudo apt-get install grpn >> >[sudo] password for mrr: >> >Reading package lists... Done >> >Building dependency tree >> >Reading state information... Done > >> Well, not _all_ linux: > >> # yum install grpn >> Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, refresh-packagekit, security >> Setting up Install Process >> No package grpn available. >> Error: Nothing to do > >> sigh. > >Just build from source. I've frankly better things to do with my time at this stage of life.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 16:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mv8q3c$sop$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #152548 |
In comp.misc Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote:
> Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes:
> >In comp.misc Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote:
> >> Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> writes:
> >> >In article <SrWdnQTD4_3OX4vLnZ2dnUU7-ImdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> >> >Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> wrote:
> >> >>Morten Reistad wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>> I still use unix' dc as my preferred quick calculator. I can paste
> >> >>> numbers into it, and it works the way my brain thinks.
> >> >>Linux (and probably a lot of other Un**-derived systems) can have grpn (or
> >> >>rpn). general RPN calculator for X screens, with dec-hex-octal conversion,
> >> >>too. That's my favorite.
> >> >
> >> >I needed to test that. So ein ding muss ich auch haben.
> >> >
> >> >mrr@xu3:~$ sudo apt-get install grpn
> >> >[sudo] password for mrr:
> >> >Reading package lists... Done
> >> >Building dependency tree
> >> >Reading state information... Done
> >
> >> Well, not _all_ linux:
> >
> >> # yum install grpn
> >> Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, refresh-packagekit, security
> >> Setting up Install Process
> >> No package grpn available.
> >> Error: Nothing to do
> >
> >> sigh.
> >
> >Just build from source.
> I've frankly better things to do with my time at this stage of life.
The 'involvement' is the sum total of:
1) download the source (which you have to download a 'package'
anyway, so this is somewhat of a wash)
2) unpack the source (it is a gzipped tar - but the package manager
also has to unpack the package, so this time is somewhat of a
wash)
3) type "make"
The time to build on an i7 cpu is 3.289s.
When "make" finishes, you have a grpn binary that runs just fine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 18:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hvTRx.74817$Rj5.5107@fx02.iad> |
| In reply to | #152553 |
Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes: >In comp.misc Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote: >> Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes: >> >In comp.misc Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote: >> >> Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> writes: >> >> >In article <SrWdnQTD4_3OX4vLnZ2dnUU7-ImdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> >> >Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> wrote: >> >> >>Morten Reistad wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> I still use unix' dc as my preferred quick calculator. I can paste >> >> >>> numbers into it, and it works the way my brain thinks. >> >> >>Linux (and probably a lot of other Un**-derived systems) can have grpn (or >> >> >>rpn). general RPN calculator for X screens, with dec-hex-octal conversion, >> >> >>too. That's my favorite. >> >> > >> >> >I needed to test that. So ein ding muss ich auch haben. >> >> > >> >> >mrr@xu3:~$ sudo apt-get install grpn >> >> >[sudo] password for mrr: >> >> >Reading package lists... Done >> >> >Building dependency tree >> >> >Reading state information... Done >> > >> >> Well, not _all_ linux: >> > >> >> # yum install grpn >> >> Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, refresh-packagekit, security >> >> Setting up Install Process >> >> No package grpn available. >> >> Error: Nothing to do >> > >> >> sigh. >> > >> >Just build from source. > >> I've frankly better things to do with my time at this stage of life. > >The 'involvement' is the sum total of: > > 1) download the source (which you have to download a 'package' > anyway, so this is somewhat of a wash) > > 2) unpack the source (it is a gzipped tar - but the package manager > also has to unpack the package, so this time is somewhat of a > wash) > > 3) type "make" > >The time to build on an i7 cpu is 3.289s. > >When "make" finishes, you have a grpn binary that runs just fine. Believe that I understand how to download and build software. I've been doing it since comp.sources.unix and before that from SHARE, DECUS, CUBE and FSF tapes. That said, I have better things to do that spend the 20 minutes or so required to build a package I've no need for and no intention of using.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 18:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mv92nh$vg9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #152559 |
In comp.misc Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote: > Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes: > >In comp.misc Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote: > >> Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes: > >> >In comp.misc Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote: > >> >> Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> writes: > >> >> >In article <SrWdnQTD4_3OX4vLnZ2dnUU7-ImdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >> >> >Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> wrote: > >> >> >>Morten Reistad wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >>> I still use unix' dc as my preferred quick calculator. I can paste > >> >> >>> numbers into it, and it works the way my brain thinks. > >> >> >>Linux (and probably a lot of other Un**-derived systems) can have grpn (or > >> >> >>rpn). general RPN calculator for X screens, with dec-hex-octal conversion, > >> >> >>too. That's my favorite. > >> >> > > >> >> >I needed to test that. So ein ding muss ich auch haben. > >> >> > > >> >> >mrr@xu3:~$ sudo apt-get install grpn > >> >> >[sudo] password for mrr: > >> >> >Reading package lists... Done > >> >> >Building dependency tree > >> >> >Reading state information... Done > >> > > >> >> Well, not _all_ linux: > >> > > >> >> # yum install grpn > >> >> Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, refresh-packagekit, security > >> >> Setting up Install Process > >> >> No package grpn available. > >> >> Error: Nothing to do > >> > > >> >> sigh. > >> > > >> >Just build from source. > > > >> I've frankly better things to do with my time at this stage of life. > > > >The 'involvement' is the sum total of: > > > > 1) download the source (which you have to download a 'package' > > anyway, so this is somewhat of a wash) > > > > 2) unpack the source (it is a gzipped tar - but the package manager > > also has to unpack the package, so this time is somewhat of a > > wash) > > > > 3) type "make" > > > >The time to build on an i7 cpu is 3.289s. > > > >When "make" finishes, you have a grpn binary that runs just fine. > That said, I have better things to do that spend the 20 minutes or so > required to build a package I've no need for and no intention of > using. Translation: you don't want to build from source not due to a lack of time to do so, but because you simply won't use the calculator. Fair enough, just be up front about it. Say: "I've no intention of using it anyway, so no thanks". Did you overlook the build time above? 3.289 seconds? Even including time to search for the home page, download, and unpack, unless one is on dialup and still running an i386 at 33mhz, there's no way grpn takes 20 minutes to build. The especially sweet irony however is that you've wasted more time here on usenet arguing how you don't have time to build from source than it would have taken to build from source.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 20:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <SfVRx.122989$F92.75958@fx03.iad> |
| In reply to | #152565 |
Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes: >In comp.misc Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote: >> Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes: >> >In comp.misc Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote: >> >> Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes: >> >> >In comp.misc Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote: >> >> >> Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> writes: >> >> >> >In article <SrWdnQTD4_3OX4vLnZ2dnUU7-ImdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> >> >> >Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> wrote: >> >> >> >>Morten Reistad wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> I still use unix' dc as my preferred quick calculator. I can paste >> >> >> >>> numbers into it, and it works the way my brain thinks. Someone along the line snipped text here, which was "all Linux" >> >> >> >>Linux (and probably a lot of other Un**-derived systems) can have grpn (or >> >> >> >>rpn). general RPN calculator for X screens, with dec-hex-octal conversion, >> >> >> >>too. That's my favorite. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >I needed to test that. So ein ding muss ich auch haben. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >mrr@xu3:~$ sudo apt-get install grpn >> >> >> >[sudo] password for mrr: >> >> >> >Reading package lists... Done >> >> >> >Building dependency tree >> >> >> >Reading state information... Done >> >> > >> >> >> Well, not _all_ linux: And here, I simply pointed out that it wasn't _all_ linux. >The especially sweet irony however is that you've wasted more time here >on usenet arguing how you don't have time to build from source than it >would have taken to build from source. Of course, when I build from source, I build RPM's so I can track the install, install on the dozen other systems running here[*], and maintain the package over the long run. Takes much longer than 3 seconds, as I would need to generate and test the spec file. [*] Four internal VM's, two external facing VM's, three laptops and three workstations; all of which are in regular use. And note, the soi disant "argument" you mention cost me about a minute and a half.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | wje@acm.org (Bill Evans) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 15:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <news.Fri.20151009.150903.PDT.647@mariposabill.com> |
| In reply to | #152576 |
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) wrote: > Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes: > >The especially sweet irony however is that you've wasted more time here > >on usenet arguing how you don't have time to build from source than it > >would have taken to build from source. > > Of course, when I build from source, I build RPM's so I can track the > install, install on the dozen other systems running here[*], and maintain > the package over the long run. > > Takes much longer than 3 seconds, as I would need to generate and test > the spec file. > > [*] Four internal VM's, two external facing VM's, three laptops and > three workstations; all of which are in regular use. The general argument that XXX is ultraconvenient because it takes only YYY minutes to compile/install is valid, but (as the above situation illustrates) to argue from this that Usenet participant ZZZ should find it convenient is a little tricky at best. Indeed, it need not be a person managing a brazillion hosts that begs to be excused from a particular trivial exercise. It can be (as just one example) someone who's retired, wants to get as much done as possible before he dies, and considers the cost of the context shift to do this trivial thing to be too high. -- Bill Evans / Box 1224 / Mariposa, CA 95338 / (209)742-4720 Mail-To: wje@acm.org -- PGP encrypted mail preferred. -- pgpkey.mariposabill.com for public key. Key #: 8D8B521B PGPprint: 0A9C 3545 8FFF 7501 6265 1519 40FF 76F9 8D8B 521B
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 20:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d7qnosFhvhhU13@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #152559 |
On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 18:15:41 +0000, Scott Lurndal wrote: > Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes: >>In comp.misc Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote: >>> Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes: >>> >In comp.misc Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote: >>> >> Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> writes: >>> >> >In article <SrWdnQTD4_3OX4vLnZ2dnUU7-ImdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>> >> >Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> wrote: >>> >> >>Morten Reistad wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> I still use unix' dc as my preferred quick calculator. I can >>> >> >>> paste numbers into it, and it works the way my brain thinks. >>> >> >>Linux (and probably a lot of other Un**-derived systems) can have >>> >> >>grpn (or rpn). general RPN calculator for X screens, with >>> >> >>dec-hex-octal conversion, >>> >> >>too. That's my favorite. >>> >> > >>> >> >I needed to test that. So ein ding muss ich auch haben. >>> >> > >>> >> >mrr@xu3:~$ sudo apt-get install grpn [sudo] password for mrr: >>> >> >Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading >>> >> >state information... Done >>> > >>> >> Well, not _all_ linux: >>> > >>> >> # yum install grpn Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, >>> >> refresh-packagekit, security Setting up Install Process No package >>> >> grpn available. >>> >> Error: Nothing to do >>> > >>> >> sigh. >>> > >>> >Just build from source. >> >>> I've frankly better things to do with my time at this stage of life. >> >>The 'involvement' is the sum total of: >> >> 1) download the source (which you have to download a 'package' >> anyway, so this is somewhat of a wash) >> >> 2) unpack the source (it is a gzipped tar - but the package manager >> also has to unpack the package, so this time is somewhat of a wash) >> >> 3) type "make" >> >>The time to build on an i7 cpu is 3.289s. >> >>When "make" finishes, you have a grpn binary that runs just fine. > > Believe that I understand how to download and build software. I've > been doing it since comp.sources.unix and before that from SHARE, DECUS, > CUBE and FSF tapes. > > That said, I have better things to do that spend the 20 minutes or so > required to build a package I've no need for and no intention of using. I downloaded the source and built it in under a minute.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 21:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d7o4rfFhvhhU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #152450 |
On Thu, 08 Oct 2015 14:23:11 -0500, Jon Elson wrote: > Morten Reistad wrote: > > >> I still use unix' dc as my preferred quick calculator. I can paste >> numbers into it, and it works the way my brain thinks. > Linux (and probably a lot of other Un**-derived systems) can have grpn > (or rpn). general RPN calculator for X screens, with dec-hex-octal > conversion, > too. That's my favorite. > > Jon oooh. Just built and installed here on FreeBSD. Thanks!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 12:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <alpine.LNX.2.02.1510081206010.9383@darkstar.example.org> |
| In reply to | #152432 |
On Wed, 7 Oct 2015, JimP wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 18:38:35 -0400, Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2015-08-25 2:16 AM, Andy Burns wrote:
>>
>>> No, I more or less avoided RPN, my maths teacher did have one of those
>>> HP programmable calculators with the magstripe reader.
>>
>> I went through high school using a slide rule, and so
>> found HP's RPN calculators much easy to use than the infix style.
>
> I recently located my Sans and Streife No 311, J.K -3 slide rule.
> Couldn't find specific instructions for it, but plenty of photographs
> online. From looking at the leather case, my name is the 3rd or 4th
> one on there. Two of the lines of ink have been well marked over.
The 12" slide rule I got in a bunch of junk has a leather or
pseudo-leather "holster", but it's worn out at the bottom, so if I wear
it like a sword, I risk losing it.
I think I'd rather have a pocket analog computer.
Michael
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 13:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ilcd1bdfsgh3ono140q4ndo4nmmlqcpq2h@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #152471 |
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:07:36 -0400, Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> wrote: >On Wed, 7 Oct 2015, JimP wrote: > >> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 18:38:35 -0400, Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> >> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-08-25 2:16 AM, Andy Burns wrote: >>> >>>> No, I more or less avoided RPN, my maths teacher did have one of those >>>> HP programmable calculators with the magstripe reader. >>> >>> I went through high school using a slide rule, and so >>> found HP's RPN calculators much easy to use than the infix style. >> >> I recently located my Sans and Streife No 311, J.K -3 slide rule. >> Couldn't find specific instructions for it, but plenty of photographs >> online. From looking at the leather case, my name is the 3rd or 4th >> one on there. Two of the lines of ink have been well marked over. > >The 12" slide rule I got in a bunch of junk has a leather or >pseudo-leather "holster", but it's worn out at the bottom, so if I wear >it like a sword, I risk losing it. > >I think I'd rather have a pocket analog computer. > > Michael Mine doesn't have a belt loop. The leather holster is in good shape. -- JimP.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 05:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mv4u3f330md@news4.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #152428 |
On 2015-10-07, Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> wrote: > On 2015-08-25 2:16 AM, Andy Burns wrote: > >> No, I more or less avoided RPN, my maths teacher did have one of those >> HP programmable calculators with the magstripe reader. > > I went through high school using a slide rule, and so > found HP's RPN calculators much easy to use than the infix style. I still have trouble with infix calculators, which seem to be the only thing you can find these days. Thank God for dc. -- /~\ cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs) \ / I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way. X Top-posted messages will probably be ignored. See RFC1855. / \ HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored. Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 13:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fTtRx.63108$gG1.36447@fx19.iad> |
| In reply to | #152442 |
Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> writes: >On 2015-10-07, Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> wrote: > >> On 2015-08-25 2:16 AM, Andy Burns wrote: >> >>> No, I more or less avoided RPN, my maths teacher did have one of those >>> HP programmable calculators with the magstripe reader. >> >> I went through high school using a slide rule, and so >> found HP's RPN calculators much easy to use than the infix style. > >I still have trouble with infix calculators, which seem to be >the only thing you can find these days. Thank God for dc. > Any posix shell will support $(( )) which allows arbitrary C-style expression evaluation. e.g. ksh$ printf "%u\n" $(( 0x87530000000 | (1 << 20) | (0 << 15) | (1 << 12) | 0x114 ))
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 12:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <alpine.LNX.2.02.1510081228320.9383@darkstar.example.org> |
| In reply to | #152442 |
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2015-10-07, Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> wrote: > >> On 2015-08-25 2:16 AM, Andy Burns wrote: >> >>> No, I more or less avoided RPN, my maths teacher did have one of those >>> HP programmable calculators with the magstripe reader. >> >> I went through high school using a slide rule, and so >> found HP's RPN calculators much easy to use than the infix style. > > I still have trouble with infix calculators, which seem to be > the only thing you can find these days. Thank God for dc. > I thought there were even some calculators that could switch between either mode. The real problem is that while a calculator with way more functions than the HP-35 can be had for about ten dollars, but if you want RPN the selection is more limited, and costs a lot more. Michael
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 12:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <d7nobmFdc08U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #152480 |
"Michael Black" wrote: > The real problem is that while a calculator with way more functions than > the HP-35 can be had for about ten dollars, but if you want RPN the > selection is more limited, and costs a lot more. I have an HP-35 but it has been in storage ever since the battery gave up so I can't look at it. But, from memory, the only added math function is factorial. There is a lot of statistical stuff, which I never use, on my TI-30Xa, which is what I normally use. I also have the early HP financial calculator and it's functional but it has no trig functions and so it's pretty useless to me. I wrote an RPN calculator for the Atari ST but I got rid of all of those a few years ago, it was a fun program to write. I wonder if RPN would have fared better if it didn't have an off-putting name? Reverse and negation are off-putting words in my mind, Polish sounds like it might be a joke. Oops, I see my TI-30 has a key labeled 'HYP' so that sounds like added math, too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 15:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mv6k1m$qu5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #152485 |
\"Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> wrote in message news:d7nobmFdc08U1@mid.individual.net... > "Michael Black" wrote: > >> The real problem is that while a calculator with way more functions than >> the HP-35 can be had for about ten dollars, but if you want RPN the >> selection is more limited, and costs a lot more. > > I have an HP-35 but it has been in storage ever since the battery gave up > so I can't look at it. But, from memory, the only added math function is > factorial. There is a lot of statistical stuff, which I never use, on my > TI-30Xa, which is what I normally use. I also have the early HP financial > calculator and it's functional but it has no trig functions and so it's > pretty useless to me. > > I wrote an RPN calculator for the Atari ST but I got rid of all of those a > few years ago, it was a fun program to write. I wonder if RPN would have > fared better if it didn't have an off-putting name? Reverse and negation > are off-putting words in my mind, Polish sounds like it might be a joke. > > Oops, I see my TI-30 has a key labeled 'HYP' so that sounds like added > math, too. The HYP key gives you access to the hyperbolic trig functions. -- numerist at aquaporin4 dot com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 19:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <nv8e1bt31slohfj4emntjk7cg5tfkjs0nv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #152485 |
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:44:21 -0500, "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net>
wrote:
[snip]
>I wrote an RPN calculator for the Atari ST but I got rid of all of those a
>few years ago, it was a fun program to write. I wonder if RPN would have
>fared better if it didn't have an off-putting name? Reverse and negation
>are off-putting words in my mind, Polish sounds like it might be a joke.
The N is for "notation".
[snip]
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 06:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <d7pmjiFs383U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #152527 |
"Gene Wirchenko" wrote: > On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:44:21 -0500, "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> > wrote: > > [snip] > >>I wrote an RPN calculator for the Atari ST but I got rid of all of those a >>few years ago, it was a fun program to write. I wonder if RPN would have >>fared better if it didn't have an off-putting name? Reverse and negation >>are off-putting words in my mind, Polish sounds like it might be a joke. > > The N is for "notation". I was noting the similarity between reverse and negation, since reverse is not a common trigger word for me. I meant no involvement of the N in RPN. People often use negation when trying to say something without actually saying it. Made up example: "The NEXT computer was not without its successes." I have to sit and fuss with it to see what the guy is trying to say. So I was trying to point out the similarity between reveres and negation. I hadn't noticed the leading 'N', it was just coincidental.. The calculator was nice because it was dead easy for me to add new functions; of course that didn't help anyone else.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 21 of 23 — ← Prev page 1 … 19 20 [21] 22 23 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.folklore.computers
csiph-web