Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #219533 > unrolled thread

Re: Who Knew ?

Started byAndreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net>
First post2021-11-01 13:52 -0400
Last post2021-11-05 15:55 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 156 — 29 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.folklore.computers

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Who Knew ? Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-11-01 13:52 -0400
    Re: Who Knew ? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-11-01 21:40 +0000
      Re: Who Knew ? Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-11-01 19:27 -0400
        Re: Who Knew ? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-11-02 05:19 +0000
    Re: Who Knew ? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2021-11-01 17:38 -0700
    Re: Who Knew ? Joy Beeson <jbeeson@invalid.net.invalid> - 2021-11-02 00:21 -0400
      Re: Who Knew ? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-11-04 19:09 +0000
    Re: Who Knew ? 1p166 <z24ba6.net> - 2021-11-02 00:11 -0400
      Re: Who Knew ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-11-02 06:17 +0000
        Re: Who Knew ? Niklas Karlsson <nikke.karlsson@gmail.com> - 2021-11-02 10:16 +0000
        Re: Who Knew ? 1p166 <z24ba6.net> - 2021-11-03 00:27 -0400
          Re: Who Knew ? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-11-03 07:26 +0000
            Re: Who Knew ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-11-03 17:18 +0000
              Re: Who Knew ? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-11-03 19:58 +0000
                Re: Who Knew ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-11-03 21:34 +0000
                  Re: Who Knew ? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2021-11-04 09:51 -0700
                    Re: Who Knew ? Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-11-04 15:37 -0400
                      Re: Who Knew ? Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-11-05 15:13 +0000
                    Re: Who Knew ? 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-11-04 15:22 -0500
                      Re: Who Knew ? Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-11-05 15:22 +0000
                      Re: Who Knew ? D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-11-05 12:05 -0500
                        Re: Who Knew ? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-11-05 08:20 -1000
                  Re: Who Knew ? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2021-11-04 10:02 -0700
                    Re: Who Knew ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-11-04 17:26 +0000
                      Re: Who Knew ? 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-11-04 15:25 -0500
                      Re: Who Knew ? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-11-04 19:10 -0400
                        Re: Who Knew ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-11-04 23:27 +0000
                          Re: Who Knew ? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-11-04 21:43 -0400
                            Re: Who Knew ? Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-11-05 08:53 +0000
                              Re: Who Knew ? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-05 11:38 +0000
                              Re: Who Knew ? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-11-05 13:30 -0400
                            Re: Who Knew ? John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2021-11-05 18:23 +0000
                              Re: Who Knew ? Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-11-05 19:37 +0000
                                Re: Who Knew ? Churchillian version John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2021-11-05 20:02 +0000
                              Re: Who Knew ? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-11-05 17:14 -0400
                        Re: Who Knew ? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-11-05 07:26 +0000
                          Re: Who Knew ? Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-11-05 14:47 +0000
                          Re: Who Knew ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-11-05 17:40 +0000
                            Re: Who Knew ? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-11-05 17:17 -0400
                              Re: Who Knew ? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-11-05 21:50 +0000
                                Re: Who Knew ? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-05 15:55 -0700
                                  Re: Who Knew ? Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-11-06 19:07 +0000
                                Re: Who Knew ? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-06 11:31 +0000
                                  Re: Who Knew ? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-11-06 15:14 +0000
                                    Re: Who Knew ? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-06 16:45 +0000
                          Re: Who Knew ? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-05 12:28 -0700
                    Re: Who Knew ? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2021-11-05 22:43 +0000
                Re: Who Knew ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-11-04 11:05 +0000
                  Re: Who Knew ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-11-04 17:19 +0000
                  Re: Who Knew ? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-04 20:13 +0000
                    Re: Who Knew ? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-04 16:11 -0700
                      Re: Who Knew ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-11-04 23:27 +0000
                      Re: Who Knew ? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-05 11:40 +0000
                        Re: Who Knew ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-11-05 14:09 +0000
                          Re: Who Knew ? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-05 15:53 +0000
                          Re: Who Knew ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-11-05 17:40 +0000
                            Re: Who Knew ? Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-11-05 19:18 +0000
                              Re: Who Knew ? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-11-05 20:04 +0000
                                Re: Who Knew ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-11-05 23:52 +0000
                                  Re: Who Knew ? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-11-06 05:13 +0000
                    Re: Who Knew ? Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-11-05 15:16 +0000
              Re: Who Knew ? "Kurt Weiske" <kurt.weiske@realitycheckbbs.org.remove-n7j-this> - 2021-11-04 07:17 -0700
                Re: Who Knew ? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-11-04 15:47 +0000
                  Re: Who Knew ? Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-11-04 20:34 +0000
                    Re: Who Knew ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-11-04 23:27 +0000
                  Re: Who Knew ? "Kurt Weiske" <kurt.weiske@realitycheckbbs.org.remove-m46-this> - 2021-11-05 07:08 -0800
                    Re: Who Knew ? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-11-07 15:43 +0000
                Re: Who Knew ? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-11-04 16:17 +0000
                  Re: Who Knew ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-11-04 17:19 +0000
                    Re: Who Knew ? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-11-04 22:18 +0000
                  Re: Who Knew ? Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2021-11-04 19:21 -0300
                    Re: Who Knew ? Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2021-11-05 05:46 +0000
                      Re: Who Knew ? Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2021-11-05 04:01 -0300
                    Re: Who Knew ? Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-11-05 15:27 +0000
                  Re: Who Knew ? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-04 16:11 -0700
                    Re: Who Knew ? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-11-05 07:29 +0000
                Re: Who Knew ? 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-11-04 15:12 -0500
                Re: Who Knew ? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-04 16:11 -0700
            Re: Who Knew ? 1p166 <z24ba6.net> - 2021-11-03 21:02 -0400
              Re: Who Knew ? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2021-11-04 00:01 -0500
                Re: Who Knew ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-11-04 11:09 +0000
                  Re: Who Knew ? Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-11-04 13:49 +0000
                Re: Who Knew ? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2021-11-04 10:11 -0700
                  Re: Who Knew ? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2021-11-04 10:16 -0700
                  Re: Who Knew ? Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-11-04 17:31 +0000
                    Re: Who Knew ? D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-11-04 13:04 -0500
                      Re: Who Knew ? Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-11-05 14:58 +0000
                    Re: Who Knew ? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-11-04 17:47 -1000
                      Re: Who Knew ? Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-11-05 15:07 +0000
                      Re: Who Knew ? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-05 12:28 -0700
                        Re: Who Knew ? D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-11-05 14:42 -0500
                    Re: Who Knew ? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-11-04 17:53 -1000
                      Re: Who Knew ? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-11-05 13:33 -0400
                      Re: Who Knew ? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-05 12:28 -0700
                        Re: Who Knew ? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-11-05 10:06 -1000
                          Re: Who Knew ? Robert Swindells <rjs@fdy2.co.uk> - 2021-11-06 15:38 +0000
                        Re: Who Knew ? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-11-05 17:39 -0400
                          Re: Who Knew ? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-05 15:55 -0700
                            Re: Who Knew ? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-11-05 19:33 -0400
                              Re: Who Knew ? D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-11-06 12:17 -0500
                                Re: Who Knew ? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-11-06 14:45 -0400
                                  Re: Who Knew ? D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-11-06 15:28 -0500
                                    Re: Who Knew ? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-11-06 18:52 -0400
                                      Re: Who Knew ? D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-11-07 08:54 -0600
                                        Re: Who Knew ? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-11-07 10:07 -0500
                            Re: Who Knew ? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-11-06 08:26 -1000
                        Re: Who Knew ? Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-11-05 22:05 +0000
                          Re: Who Knew ? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-05 15:55 -0700
                    Re: Who Knew ? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-05 12:04 -0700
                  Re: Who Knew ? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-11-04 18:32 +0000
                  Re: Who Knew ? 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-11-06 19:25 -0500
                    Re: Who Knew ? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-07 11:20 +0000
                    Re: Who Knew ? D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-11-07 08:55 -0600
                      Re: Who Knew ? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-11-07 10:15 -0500
                      Re: Who Knew ? 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-11-07 23:44 -0600
                        Re: Who Knew ? Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-11-08 15:39 +0000
                          Re: Who Knew ? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-11-08 17:06 +0000
                            Re: Who Knew ? lawrenabae@abaluon.abaom (Lawrence Statton (NK1G)) - 2021-11-09 19:06 -0600
                        Re: Who Knew ? D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-11-08 09:51 -0600
                        Re: Who Knew ? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-08 10:52 -0700
                          Re: Who Knew ? Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-11-08 19:14 +0000
                            Re: Who Knew ? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-11-08 12:09 -1000
                              Re: Who Knew ? 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-11-08 22:38 -0600
                              Re: Who Knew ? Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-11-09 15:30 +0000
                                Re: Who Knew ? D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-11-09 14:57 -0600
                                  Re: Who Knew ? Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-11-11 15:03 +0000
                              Re: Who Knew ? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-11-11 17:02 -1000
                            Re: Alternate Who Knew ? John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2021-11-08 22:22 +0000
                          Re: Who Knew ? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-11-08 18:07 -0500
                            Re: military options, was Who Knew ? John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2021-11-09 01:58 +0000
                              Re: military options, was Who Knew ? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-11-08 23:17 -0500
                                Re: military options, was Who Knew ? Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-11-09 10:02 -0500
                              Re: military options, was Who Knew ? 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-11-08 22:51 -0600
                          Re: Who Knew ? 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-11-08 22:35 -0600
                            Re: Who Knew ? D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-11-09 09:09 -0600
                          Re: Who Knew ? Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> - 2021-11-14 18:45 +0100
                            Re: Who Knew ? D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-11-14 12:39 -0600
                              Re: Who Knew ? 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-11-15 00:43 -0600
                                Re: Who Knew ? D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-11-16 08:58 -0600
                              Re: Who Knew ? Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-11-16 16:57 -0500
                                Re: Who Knew ? D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-11-17 10:54 -0600
                                  Re: Who Knew ? Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-11-17 14:16 -0500
                            Re: Who Knew ? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-11-14 14:32 -0500
              Re: Who Knew ? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-11-04 05:01 +0000
                Re: Who Knew ? Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-11-04 13:48 +0000
                  Re: Who Knew ? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-11-04 15:46 +0000
                    Re: Who Knew ? Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-11-04 15:26 -0400
                Re: Who Knew ? 1p166 <z24ba6.net> - 2021-11-04 23:51 -0400
                  Re: Who Knew ? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-11-05 07:37 +0000
                    Re: Who Knew ? Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-11-05 08:54 +0000
                    Re: Who Knew ? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-11-05 13:49 +0000
              Re: Who Knew ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-11-04 11:08 +0000
          Re: Who Knew ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-11-03 17:18 +0000
        Re: Who Knew ? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2021-11-05 22:17 +0000
          Re: Who Knew ? Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-11-05 22:46 +0000
          Re: Who Knew ? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-11-05 15:55 -0700

Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8  Next page →


#219618

FromD.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com>
Date2021-11-05 12:05 -0500
Message-ID<f1paogp0pgroehd4uv2hfeuh036iagu8ga@4ax.com>
In reply to#219581
On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 15:22:10 -0500, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
wrote:
>On 11/4/21 11:51 AM, Quadibloc wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>> Orwell was reacting, perhaps, to McCarthyism, by warning of the danger
>> that a long-continued Cold War could cause the West to become like the
>> Soviet Union.
>
>YGBSM.
>
>McCarthy was right. You are witnessing and living through a communist
>color revolution in the United States and the west in general. Your
>denial of the obvious with this anti-McCarthy tripe is just gross.

McCarthy went after the wrong people. And the big thing now in the US
is a surgence of Facism. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219623

FromAnne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com>
Date2021-11-05 08:20 -1000
Message-ID<87ee7u1n2v.fsf@localhost>
In reply to#219618
D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> writes:
> McCarthy went after the wrong people. And the big thing now in the US
> is a surgence of Facism. 

or resurgence ...

Social democracy ... countermeasure to capitalism and fascism, example, On War
https://www.amazon.com/War-beautifully-reproduced-illustrated-introduction-ebook/dp/B00G3DFLY8/
loc394-95: As long as the Socialists only threatened capital they were
not seriously interfered with, for the Government knew quite well that
the undisputed sway of the employer was not for the ultimate good of the
State.

the government needed general population standard of living sufficient
that soldiers were willing to fight to preserve their way of
life. Capitalists tendency was to reduce worker standard of living to
the lowest possible ... below what the government needed for soldier
motivation ... and therefor needed socialists as counterbalance to the
capitalists in raising the general population standard of living. Saw
this fight out in the 30s, American Fascists opposing all of FDR's "new
deals" The Coming of American Fascism, 1920-1940
https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/172004
The truth, then, is that Long and Coughlin, together with the
influential Communist Party and other leftist organizations, helped save
the New Deal from becoming genuinely fascist, from devolving into the
dictatorial rule of big business. The pressures towards fascism
remained, as reactionary sectors of business began to have significant
victories against the Second New Deal starting in the late 1930s. But
the genuine power that organized labor had achieved by then kept the
U.S. from sliding into all-out fascism (in the Marxist sense) in the
following decades.

... snip ...

"Coming of America Fascism" shows socialists countered the "New Deal"
becoming fascist ... which had been the objective of the capitalists
... thwarting the American Fascists contributed to forcing them further
into the Nazi/fascist camp. When The Bankers Plotted To Overthrow FDR
https://www.npr.org/2012/02/12/145472726/when-the-bankers-plotted-to-overthrow-fdr
The Plots Against the President: FDR, A Nation in Crisis, and the Rise
of the American Right
https://www.amazon.com/Plots-Against-President-Nation-American-ebook/dp/B07N4BLR77/
Wealthy bankers and businessmen plotted to overthrow FDR. A retired general foiled it.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2021/01/13/fdr-roosevelt-coup-business-plot/
Wall Street's Plot to Seize the White House: Facing the Corporate Roots of American Fascism
http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/53/53-index.html
Gen. Butler Bares 'Fascist Plot' To Seize Government by Force
https://www.nytimes.com/1934/11/21/archives/gen-butler-bares-fascist-plot-to-seize-government-by-force-says.html
The plot to overthrow FDR: How the New Deal sent conservatives into a
rage. The right's temper tantrums over Obamacare are nothing compared to
what Roosevelt had to deal with
https://www.salon.com/2014/04/18/the_plot_to_overthrow_fdr_how_the_new_deal_sent_conservatives_into_a_rage_partner/
Foiled Coup: The Connecticut Plot to Overthrow Franklin Roosevelt
https://www.blackstarnews.com/us-politics/justice/foiled-coup-the-connecticut-plot-to-overthrow-franklin-roosevelt

Smedley Butler, retired USMC major general and two-time Medal of Honor
Recipient https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smedley_Butler
... wrote "War Is A Racket"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Is_a_Racket
... and was asked to lead an american fascist military take-over of the
gov. and blew the whistle
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot

John Foster Dulles played major role rebuilding Germany economy,
industry, military from the 20s up through the early 40s
https://www.amazon.com/Brothers-Foster-Dulles-Allen-Secret-ebook/dp/B00BY5QX1K/
loc865-68: In mid-1931 a consortium of American banks, eager to
safeguard their investments in Germany, persuaded the German government
to accept a loan of nearly $500 million to prevent default. Foster was
their agent. His ties to the German government tightened after Hitler
took power at the beginning of 1933 and appointed Foster's old friend
Hjalmar Schacht as minister of economics.
loc905-7: Foster was stunned by his brother's suggestion that Sullivan &
Cromwell quit Germany. Many of his clients with interests there,
including not just banks but corporations like Standard Oil and General
Electric, wished Sullivan & Cromwell to remain active regardless of
political conditions.
loc938-40: At least one other senior partner at Sullivan & Cromwell, Eustace
Seligman, was equally disturbed. In October 1939, six weeks after the
Nazi invasion of Poland, he took the extraordinary step of sending
Foster a formal memorandum disavowing what his old friend was saying
about Nazism

... snip ...

from the law of unintended consequences, when US 1943 Strategic Bombing
program needed targets in Germany, they got plans and coordinates from
wallstreet.

American Nazis Rally in New York City. On February 20, 1939, the
pro-Nazi German American Bund drew more than 20,000 people to a rally in
Madison Square Garden.
https://newspapers.ushmm.org/events/american-nazis-rally-in-new-york-city
June1940, Germany had a victory celebration at the NYC Waldorf-Astoria
with major industrialists. Lots of them were there to hear how to do
business with the Nazis
https://www.amazon.com/Man-Called-Intrepid-Incredible-Narrative-ebook/dp/B00V9QVE5O/
loc1925-29: One prominent figure at the German victory celebration was
Torkild Rieber, of Texaco, whose tankers eluded the British
blockade. The company had already been warned, at Roosevelt's
instigation, about violations of the Neutrality Law. But Rieber had set
up an elaborate scheme for shipping oil and petroleum products through
neutral ports in South America.

... snip ...

Later somewhat replay of the 1940 celebration, there was conference of
5000 industrialists and corporations from across the US at the
Waldorf-Astoria, and in part because they had gotten such a bad
reputation for the depression and supporting Nazis, as part of
attempting to refurbish their horribly corrupt and venal image, they
approved a major propaganda campaign to equate Capitalism with
Christianity.
https://www.amazon.com/One-Nation-Under-God-Corporate-ebook/dp/B00PWX7R56/
part of the result by the early 50s was adding "under god" to the pledge
of allegiance. slightly cleaned up version
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance

False Profits: Reviving the Corporation's Public Purpose
https://www.uclalawreview.org/false-profits-reviving-the-corporations-public-purpose/
I Origins of the Corporation. Although the corporate structure dates
back as far as the Greek and Roman Empires, characteristics of the
modern corporation began to appear in England in the mid-thirteenth
century.[4] "Merchant guilds" were loose organizations of merchants
"governed through a council somewhat akin to a board of directors," and
organized to "achieve a common purpose"[5] that was public in
nature. Indeed, merchant guilds registered with the state and were
approved only if they were "serving national purposes."[6]

... snip ...

... but nearly from the founding of the country there has been pressure
to allow corporations to operate in self-interest.

-- 
virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219567

FromQuadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca>
Date2021-11-04 10:02 -0700
Message-ID<4ee39e02-a0a4-4159-91e4-75b71700a9aen@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#219553
On Wednesday, November 3, 2021 at 3:34:39 PM UTC-6, Charlie Gibbs wrote:

> Societies seem to need a slave class. _Brave New World_ described this 
> in some detail. We thought that machines would take the place of this 
> class - but instead have turned out to be agents of the ruling class.

And here I thought that the slave class subsidizing the people of Western
industrialized nations such as the one I live in as well as your own was the
labor force of the PRC.

Yet, the time when Canada, the United States, and much of the world was
happiest was when there was no 'slave class'; in the early 'sixties, we made
our own TV sets and radios, out of vacuum tubes even, and so there were
decent jobs for everyone.

Still, despite the pandemic, we're having the Great Resignation - apparently
the world is currently in what will become known as the YouTube Bubble.

Having only recently - some two million years ago - evolved from the
chimpanzee, it might not be too outrageous to suppose that a significant
proportion of the human race is not yet well-developed enough for civilized
life. (ObSF: _The Island of Doctor Moreau_ by H. G. Wells.) But we don't
have as much clear evidence of that as we might, otherwise, because we're
neglecting the education system - presumably out of a perceived need for
a slave class - so that we have many people whose inability to function as
responsible citizens was not genetically fore-ordained.

John Savard

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219572

FromCharlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>
Date2021-11-04 17:26 +0000
Message-ID<vJUgJ.21800$bo.3833@fx18.iad>
In reply to#219567
On 2021-11-04, Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote:

> On Wednesday, November 3, 2021 at 3:34:39 PM UTC-6, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>
>> Societies seem to need a slave class. _Brave New World_ described this 
>> in some detail. We thought that machines would take the place of this 
>> class - but instead have turned out to be agents of the ruling class.
>
> And here I thought that the slave class subsidizing the people of Western
> industrialized nations such as the one I live in as well as your own was the
> labor force of the PRC.

That's a good part of it.  But let's face it, it's necessary (not to
mention fun) to have lots of slaves.

> Yet, the time when Canada, the United States, and much of the world was
> happiest was when there was no 'slave class'; in the early 'sixties, we made
> our own TV sets and radios, out of vacuum tubes even, and so there were
> decent jobs for everyone.
>
> Still, despite the pandemic, we're having the Great Resignation - apparently
> the world is currently in what will become known as the YouTube Bubble.
>
> Having only recently - some two million years ago - evolved from the
> chimpanzee, it might not be too outrageous to suppose that a significant
> proportion of the human race is not yet well-developed enough for civilized
> life. (ObSF: _The Island of Doctor Moreau_ by H. G. Wells.) But we don't
> have as much clear evidence of that as we might, otherwise, because we're
> neglecting the education system - presumably out of a perceived need for
> a slave class - so that we have many people whose inability to function as
> responsible citizens was not genetically fore-ordained.

And now, the median human intelligence (as well as sense of responsibility)
is falling below the point necessary to sustain democracy.

-- 
/~\  Charlie Gibbs                  |  Life is perverse.
\ /  <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>      |  It can be beautiful -
 X   I'm really at ac.dekanfrus     |  but it won't.
/ \  if you read it the right way.  |    -- Lily Tomlin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219582

From711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
Date2021-11-04 15:25 -0500
Message-ID<sm1fg9$vnp$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#219572
On 11/4/21 12:26 PM, Charlie Gibbs wrote:

> And now, the median human intelligence (as well as sense of responsibility)
> is falling below the point necessary to sustain democracy.

"Democracy is government ...

    by the people ...

        of the people ...

            for the people ...

                but the people are retarded." --Osho

-- 
──┏━━━━┓──┏━━┓───┏━━┓──  ┌────────────────────────┐ ┌────────┐
──┗━━┓─┃──┗┓─┃───┗┓─┃──  │ Spooky Mart [chan] 711 │ │ always │
─────┃─┃──┏┛─┗┓──┏┛─┗┓─  │ https://bitmessage.org │ │  open  │
─────┗━┛──┗━━━┛──┗━━━┛─  └────────────────────────┘ └────────┘

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219586

FromJ. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com>
Date2021-11-04 19:10 -0400
Message-ID<91q8ogtsfimqs54vtjg7nlcel0q1q998ah@4ax.com>
In reply to#219572
On Thu, 04 Nov 2021 17:26:51 GMT, Charlie Gibbs
<cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote:

>On 2021-11-04, Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, November 3, 2021 at 3:34:39 PM UTC-6, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>>
>>> Societies seem to need a slave class. _Brave New World_ described this 
>>> in some detail. We thought that machines would take the place of this 
>>> class - but instead have turned out to be agents of the ruling class.
>>
>> And here I thought that the slave class subsidizing the people of Western
>> industrialized nations such as the one I live in as well as your own was the
>> labor force of the PRC.
>
>That's a good part of it.  But let's face it, it's necessary (not to
>mention fun) to have lots of slaves.
>
>> Yet, the time when Canada, the United States, and much of the world was
>> happiest was when there was no 'slave class'; in the early 'sixties, we made
>> our own TV sets and radios, out of vacuum tubes even, and so there were
>> decent jobs for everyone.
>>
>> Still, despite the pandemic, we're having the Great Resignation - apparently
>> the world is currently in what will become known as the YouTube Bubble.
>>
>> Having only recently - some two million years ago - evolved from the
>> chimpanzee, it might not be too outrageous to suppose that a significant
>> proportion of the human race is not yet well-developed enough for civilized
>> life. (ObSF: _The Island of Doctor Moreau_ by H. G. Wells.) But we don't
>> have as much clear evidence of that as we might, otherwise, because we're
>> neglecting the education system - presumably out of a perceived need for
>> a slave class - so that we have many people whose inability to function as
>> responsible citizens was not genetically fore-ordained.
>
>And now, the median human intelligence (as well as sense of responsibility)
>is falling below the point necessary to sustain democracy.

Or as we grow closer and closer to achieving actual democracy we see
more and more why it's a bad idea.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219591

FromCharlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>
Date2021-11-04 23:27 +0000
Message-ID<t%ZgJ.10014$zF3.2332@fx03.iad>
In reply to#219586
On 2021-11-04, J  Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 04 Nov 2021 17:26:51 GMT, Charlie Gibbs
> <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote:
>
>> And now, the median human intelligence (as well as sense of responsibility)
>> is falling below the point necessary to sustain democracy.
>
> Or as we grow closer and closer to achieving actual democracy we see
> more and more why it's a bad idea.

    Democracy is the worst form of government,
    except for all the others.
      -- Winston Churchill

-- 
/~\  Charlie Gibbs                  |  Life is perverse.
\ /  <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>      |  It can be beautiful -
 X   I'm really at ac.dekanfrus     |  but it won't.
/ \  if you read it the right way.  |    -- Lily Tomlin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219594

FromJ. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com>
Date2021-11-04 21:43 -0400
Message-ID<4139og56uric5jtuflb6ao48josssrj2ac@4ax.com>
In reply to#219591
On Thu, 04 Nov 2021 23:27:21 GMT, Charlie Gibbs
<cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote:

>On 2021-11-04, J  Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 04 Nov 2021 17:26:51 GMT, Charlie Gibbs
>> <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> And now, the median human intelligence (as well as sense of responsibility)
>>> is falling below the point necessary to sustain democracy.
>>
>> Or as we grow closer and closer to achieving actual democracy we see
>> more and more why it's a bad idea.
>
>    Democracy is the worst form of government,
>    except for all the others.
>      -- Winston Churchill

The Prime Minister of a monarchy with a parliament one of whose houses
is the House of Lords.  I don't think he really had all that much
experience of democracy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219603

FromBob Eager <news0009@eager.cx>
Date2021-11-05 08:53 +0000
Message-ID<iuk9o6Fqi9U6@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#219594
On Thu, 04 Nov 2021 21:43:58 -0400, J. Clarke wrote:

> On Thu, 04 Nov 2021 23:27:21 GMT, Charlie Gibbs
> <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>On 2021-11-04, J  Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 04 Nov 2021 17:26:51 GMT, Charlie Gibbs
>>> <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> And now, the median human intelligence (as well as sense of
>>>> responsibility)
>>>> is falling below the point necessary to sustain democracy.
>>>
>>> Or as we grow closer and closer to achieving actual democracy we see
>>> more and more why it's a bad idea.
>>
>>    Democracy is the worst form of government,
>>    except for all the others.
>>      -- Winston Churchill
> 
> The Prime Minister of a monarchy with a parliament one of whose houses
> is the House of Lords.  I don't think he really had all that much
> experience of democracy.

A constitutional monarchy. There is a difference.



-- 
Using UNIX since v6 (1975)...

Use the BIG mirror service in the UK:
 http://www.mirrorservice.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219606

Fromgareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com>
Date2021-11-05 11:38 +0000
Message-ID<sm353q$ogn$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#219603
On 05/11/2021 08:53, Bob Eager wrote:
>
> A constitutional monarchy. There is a difference.

A cpmpletely meaningless term, for where a country has
a monarchy, then it constitutes part of that country.

The dead hand of the monarchy in Brit weaves its way
into all corners, where in each sub division there
is a Lord Lieutenant, a direct and undemocratic representative
of the monarchy one of whose functions is to appoint
the magistracy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219619

FromJ. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com>
Date2021-11-05 13:30 -0400
Message-ID<igqaog58b18ivkc2l0tp1e5ls78g1tcn0t@4ax.com>
In reply to#219603
On 5 Nov 2021 08:53:26 GMT, Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> wrote:

>On Thu, 04 Nov 2021 21:43:58 -0400, J. Clarke wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 04 Nov 2021 23:27:21 GMT, Charlie Gibbs
>> <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>>On 2021-11-04, J  Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 04 Nov 2021 17:26:51 GMT, Charlie Gibbs
>>>> <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> And now, the median human intelligence (as well as sense of
>>>>> responsibility)
>>>>> is falling below the point necessary to sustain democracy.
>>>>
>>>> Or as we grow closer and closer to achieving actual democracy we see
>>>> more and more why it's a bad idea.
>>>
>>>    Democracy is the worst form of government,
>>>    except for all the others.
>>>      -- Winston Churchill
>> 
>> The Prime Minister of a monarchy with a parliament one of whose houses
>> is the House of Lords.  I don't think he really had all that much
>> experience of democracy.
>
>A constitutional monarchy. There is a difference.

Not one that makes it a democracy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219624

FromJohn Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Date2021-11-05 18:23 +0000
Message-ID<sm3srd$2ilp$1@gal.iecc.com>
In reply to#219594
According to J. Clarke  <jclarke.873638@gmail.com>:
>>    Democracy is the worst form of government,
>>    except for all the others.
>>      -- Winston Churchill
>
>The Prime Minister of a monarchy with a parliament one of whose houses
>is the House of Lords.  I don't think he really had all that much
>experience of democracy.

His mother was American.


-- 
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219630

FromMaus <Greymaus@mail.com>
Date2021-11-05 19:37 +0000
Message-ID<slrnsob1vl.c02.Greymaus@dmaus.org>
In reply to#219624
On 2021-11-05, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> According to J. Clarke  <jclarke.873638@gmail.com>:
>>>    Democracy is the worst form of government,
>>>    except for all the others.
>>>      -- Winston Churchill
>>
>>The Prime Minister of a monarchy with a parliament one of whose houses
>>is the House of Lords.  I don't think he really had all that much
>>experience of democracy.
>
> His mother was American.
>
>

Churchill was a convinced Imperialist. He was at the heart of British
government for many years, and made a lot of very stupid plans, as in
the dardenelles (sp?) in WWI. and among other things, thought of
recruiting untrained -ex-soldiers to a group in Ireland during the early
stage of the Anglo-Irish war, whose aim was to combat the IRA through
terrror, but instead antagonised most people against the British.

I would agree that he was a good choice to lead the coalition in early
WWII.


-- 
greymausg@mail.com
That's not a mousehole!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219634 — Re: Who Knew ? Churchillian version

FromJohn Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Date2021-11-05 20:02 +0000
SubjectRe: Who Knew ? Churchillian version
Message-ID<sm42kc$57e$1@gal.iecc.com>
In reply to#219630
According to Maus  <rhunDARNtheSPAM@DARNtheSPAMkatamailDARNtheSPAM.com>:
>> His mother was American.
>
>Churchill was a convinced Imperialist. He was at the heart of British
>government for many years, and made a lot of very stupid plans, as in
>the Dardanelles in WWI. and among other things, thought of
>recruiting untrained -ex-soldiers to a group in Ireland during the early
>stage of the Anglo-Irish war, whose aim was to combat the IRA through
>terrror, but instead antagonised most people against the British.
>
>I would agree that he was a good choice to lead the coalition in early WWII.

Considering his repeated high profile failures in WWI and afterward
(you missed the disastrous return to the gold standard in 1925), it
says someting about British politics that nonetheless he became P.M. in 
1940 and it is utterly astonishing that he did such a good job as war P.M.

He had another stint as P.M. in 1951-55, mostly notable for his extreme poor
health, and he likely would have resigned except that his heir apparent
Anthony Eden was in even worse condition.

-- 
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219637

FromJ. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com>
Date2021-11-05 17:14 -0400
Message-ID<7l7boglvqrdvspc822egd61n8n23tegpu8@4ax.com>
In reply to#219624
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 18:23:41 -0000 (UTC), John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
wrote:

>According to J. Clarke  <jclarke.873638@gmail.com>:
>>>    Democracy is the worst form of government,
>>>    except for all the others.
>>>      -- Winston Churchill
>>
>>The Prime Minister of a monarchy with a parliament one of whose houses
>>is the House of Lords.  I don't think he really had all that much
>>experience of democracy.
>
>His mother was American.

America wasn't a democracy either.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219601

FromAhem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net>
Date2021-11-05 07:26 +0000
Message-ID<20211105072639.09406548eae3bb19a2577cef@eircom.net>
In reply to#219586
On Thu, 04 Nov 2021 19:10:08 -0400
J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote:

> Or as we grow closer and closer to achieving actual democracy we see
> more and more why it's a bad idea.

	Democracy is great when an honestly informed and engaged population
chooses among a set of honest and dedicated politicians.

	It's a pity that there seems to be no cause so noble and correct
that it lacks supporters willing to lie to further it and in so doing
discredit it. It is also a pity that most people are more interested in
sports, telly, booze, drugs, feuds and sex than how their country is run. It
is also a pity that many politicians seems to be more interested in feeding
at the public trough than serving the state. Just three things to fix to
get a perfect system.

	The optimal form of government is probably a benevolent
dictatorship, provided there is an endless supply of competent benevolent
dictators and the means to ensure that only such get to rule - I don't see
this as possible either.

	What most people want from their government is that it lets them
get on with their lives with a minimum of visible interference - by this
criteria any government that indulges in war is an abject failure.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith
Odds and Ends at http://www.sohara.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219610

FromMaus <Greymaus@mail.com>
Date2021-11-05 14:47 +0000
Message-ID<slrnsoagvh.7q3.Greymaus@dmaus.org>
In reply to#219601
On 2021-11-05, Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Nov 2021 19:10:08 -0400
> J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Or as we grow closer and closer to achieving actual democracy we see
>> more and more why it's a bad idea.
>
> 	Democracy is great when an honestly informed and engaged population
> chooses among a set of honest and dedicated politicians.
>
> 	It's a pity that there seems to be no cause so noble and correct
> that it lacks supporters willing to lie to further it and in so doing
> discredit it. It is also a pity that most people are more interested in
> sports, telly, booze, drugs, feuds and sex than how their country is run. It

Ive thrown out the telly, have little insterest in sports, now that
Dublin have been beaten, abhor drugs, so I am left with feuds and
imaginary sex. Life gets boring.

> is also a pity that many politicians seems to be more interested in feeding
> at the public trough than serving the state. Just three things to fix to
> get a perfect system.
>
> 	The optimal form of government is probably a benevolent
> dictatorship, provided there is an endless supply of competent benevolent
> dictators and the means to ensure that only such get to rule - I don't see
> this as possible either.

Study the Decline and Fall of the romans. Big problems with succession.

>
> 	What most people want from their government is that it lets them
> get on with their lives with a minimum of visible interference - by this
> criteria any government that indulges in war is an abject failure.
>


-- 
greymausg@mail.com
That's not a mousehole!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219622

FromCharlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>
Date2021-11-05 17:40 +0000
Message-ID<X%dhJ.1368$SW5.173@fx45.iad>
In reply to#219601
On 2021-11-05, Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> wrote:

> 	The optimal form of government is probably a benevolent
> dictatorship, provided there is an endless supply of competent
> benevolent dictators and the means to ensure that only such
> get to rule - I don't see this as possible either.

Plus you have to ensure that the existing benevolent dictator
remains benevolent - or have a reliable mechanism for removing
him when the inevitable happens.

> 	What most people want from their government is that it lets them
> get on with their lives with a minimum of visible interference - by this
> criteria any government that indulges in war is an abject failure.

At least war on their own soil.  Foreign wars are a great source
of entertainment, if nothing else.

-- 
/~\  Charlie Gibbs                  |  Life is perverse.
\ /  <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>      |  It can be beautiful -
 X   I'm really at ac.dekanfrus     |  but it won't.
/ \  if you read it the right way.  |    -- Lily Tomlin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219638

FromJ. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com>
Date2021-11-05 17:17 -0400
Message-ID<mn7boglh23c84vdtokk3m642vd1al7r2ph@4ax.com>
In reply to#219622
On Fri, 05 Nov 2021 17:40:07 GMT, Charlie Gibbs
<cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote:

>On 2021-11-05, Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> wrote:
>
>> 	The optimal form of government is probably a benevolent
>> dictatorship, provided there is an endless supply of competent
>> benevolent dictators and the means to ensure that only such
>> get to rule - I don't see this as possible either.
>
>Plus you have to ensure that the existing benevolent dictator
>remains benevolent - or have a reliable mechanism for removing
>him when the inevitable happens.

One of the major benefits of a dictator is that one person with a
rifle and a bit of luck can remove the dictator, unlike Congress which
is like a hydra--cut off one head and it sprouts two more.

>> 	What most people want from their government is that it lets them
>> get on with their lives with a minimum of visible interference - by this
>> criteria any government that indulges in war is an abject failure.
>
>At least war on their own soil.  Foreign wars are a great source
>of entertainment, if nothing else.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219640

FromAhem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net>
Date2021-11-05 21:50 +0000
Message-ID<20211105215032.a2f5c497c5193bc226502eed@eircom.net>
In reply to#219638
On Fri, 05 Nov 2021 17:17:21 -0400
J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote:

> One of the major benefits of a dictator is that one person with a
> rifle and a bit of luck can remove the dictator, unlike Congress which
> is like a hydra--cut off one head and it sprouts two more.

	Hmm maybe there's an approach. So we have a dictator with absolute
power except that they are not permitted any form of personal protection,
replacements selected by reality TV as needed.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith
Odds and Ends at http://www.sohara.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.folklore.computers


csiph-web