Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #216281 > unrolled thread

DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent

Started byAndreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net>
First post2021-01-13 10:57 -0500
Last post2021-02-25 03:58 -0800
Articles 7 on this page of 47 — 20 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.folklore.computers

Contents

  DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-13 10:57 -0500
    Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Marco Scholz <tool@disroot.org> - 2021-01-13 17:09 +0000
      Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-13 20:11 -0500
        Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-01-14 08:13 +0000
          Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-14 15:35 -0500
      Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2021-01-14 01:49 -0800
        Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-01-15 09:45 +0000
          Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2021-01-15 11:04 -0800
            Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-01-15 18:12 -0500
              Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-15 22:10 -0500
                Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-01-16 10:05 +0000
              Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-01-20 17:15 +0000
                Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Robert Netzlof <rnetzlof@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 09:55 -0800
                Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent usenet@only.tnx (Questor) - 2021-01-20 20:14 +0000
                Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-01-20 20:06 -0500
                  Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-01-21 02:30 +0000
                    Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-01-21 15:29 -0500
                Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2021-02-23 21:49 +0000
                  Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Daniel <me@sci.fidan.com> - 2021-02-23 23:38 -0800
                    Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-24 09:27 -0700
                      Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-02-24 12:13 -0500
                      Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-02-24 17:13 +0000
                        Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-02-24 12:52 -0600
                    Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-02-24 17:33 +0000
                      Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-02-24 19:20 -0500
                        Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-25 21:06 -0500
                          Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Robert Swindells <rjs@fdy2.co.uk> - 2021-02-26 14:06 +0000
                            Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-02-26 17:21 -0500
                              Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2021-02-26 22:05 -0800
                                Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2021-02-27 06:39 +0000
                                Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2021-02-26 22:45 -0800
                                Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-02-27 02:24 -0500
                                Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-27 10:32 -0500
                            Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-26 20:55 -0500
                              Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Robert Swindells <rjs@fdy2.co.uk> - 2021-02-27 13:57 +0000
                                Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-02-27 09:43 -0500
                                  Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-27 10:23 -0500
                              Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2021-02-28 21:11 +0000
                              Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2021-03-14 19:57 +0000
                          Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2021-02-26 07:17 -0800
                            Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-26 15:23 +0000
                        Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2021-02-26 07:14 -0800
                          Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-02-26 19:42 +0000
                          Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-02-26 19:41 +0000
                            Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Daniel <me@sci.fidan.com> - 2021-02-27 01:19 -0800
                              Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-02-27 10:21 +0000
                      Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Daniel <me@sci.fidan.com> - 2021-02-25 03:58 -0800

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

#217147

Fromgareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com>
Date2021-02-26 15:23 +0000
Message-ID<s1b3pt$u2m$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#217146
On 26/02/2021 15:17, Quadibloc wrote:
> On Thursday, February 25, 2021 at 7:06:41 PM UTC-7, Andreas Kohlbach wrote:
>
>> So an English Electric Lightning is what you want to fly. :-D
>
> Not being an adventurous type, I'll settle for "flying" an English
> Electric Leo Marconi... Kay Dee Eff Nine!

Are you sugesting that the KDF9 was a further development of the LEO?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#217145

FromQuadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca>
Date2021-02-26 07:14 -0800
Message-ID<c6fb1c65-8e65-461c-847d-46618418a02bn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#217122
On Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 5:20:10 PM UTC-7, J. Clarke wrote:
> On 24 Feb 2021 17:33:22 GMT, Charlie Gibbs <cgi...@kltpzyxm.invalid> 
> wrote:
> >On 2021-02-24, Daniel <m...@sci.fidan.com> wrote: 

> >> Anyway, the U2 is my favorite military aircraft and whenever I fly above 
> >> Beale AFB, I make a point to look for U2's flying below me. 

> >I would think it would be more appropriate to look for them 
> >flying waaaaaay above you. :-)

> Yeah, if you're looking down on U-2s I wanna be flying whatever 
> _you're_ flying.

No matter how high a U-2 can fly, it still has to land sometime, and thus it
also sometimes takes off from the ground. So even someone in a Cessna
could, if flying over the right airport at the right time, see a U-2 in flight
below him.

John Savard

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#217148

FromCharlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>
Date2021-02-26 19:42 +0000
Message-ID<s1bius030em@news3.newsguy.com>
In reply to#217145
On 2021-02-26, Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote:

> On Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 5:20:10 PM UTC-7, J. Clarke wrote:
>
>> On 24 Feb 2021 17:33:22 GMT, Charlie Gibbs <cgi...@kltpzyxm.invalid> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2021-02-24, Daniel <m...@sci.fidan.com> wrote: 
>>>
>>>> Anyway, the U2 is my favorite military aircraft and whenever I fly above 
>>>> Beale AFB, I make a point to look for U2's flying below me. 
>>>
>>> I would think it would be more appropriate to look for them 
>>> flying waaaaaay above you. :-)
>>
>> Yeah, if you're looking down on U-2s I wanna be flying whatever 
>> _you're_ flying.
>
> No matter how high a U-2 can fly, it still has to land sometime, and thus it
> also sometimes takes off from the ground. So even someone in a Cessna
> could, if flying over the right airport at the right time, see a U-2 in flight
> below him.

"It's a joke, son."

-- 
/~\  Charlie Gibbs                  |  "Some of you may die,
\ /  <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>      |  but it's a sacrifice
 X   I'm really at ac.dekanfrus     |  I'm willing to make."
/ \  if you read it the right way.  |    -- Lord Farquaad (Shrek)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#217150

FromAhem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net>
Date2021-02-26 19:41 +0000
Message-ID<20210226194107.f0e9d4ae33a54a3265817397@eircom.net>
In reply to#217145
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:14:24 -0800 (PST)
Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote:

> No matter how high a U-2 can fly, it still has to land sometime, and thus
> it also sometimes takes off from the ground. So even someone in a Cessna
> could, if flying over the right airport at the right time, see a U-2 in
> flight below him.

	Not for long though.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith                          |   Directable Mirror Arrays
C:\>WIN                                     | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins.                |    licences available see
You lose and Bill collects.                 |    http://www.sohara.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#217162

FromDaniel <me@sci.fidan.com>
Date2021-02-27 01:19 -0800
Message-ID<87ft1heukm.fsf@sci.fidan.com>
In reply to#217150
Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> writes:

> On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:14:24 -0800 (PST)
> Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>> No matter how high a U-2 can fly, it still has to land sometime, and thus
>> it also sometimes takes off from the ground. So even someone in a Cessna
>> could, if flying over the right airport at the right time, see a U-2 in
>> flight below him.
>
> 	Not for long though.

Nor am I above Beale for long either. My plane cruises at 160kts. That
place is gone in no time. And yes, I do see them almost every time I fly
through and usually they're landing or approaching to land.

-- 
Daniel
Visit me at: gopher://gcpp.world

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#217163

FromAhem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net>
Date2021-02-27 10:21 +0000
Message-ID<20210227102133.b8094526316c9c3ee806211c@eircom.net>
In reply to#217162
On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 01:19:53 -0800
Daniel <me@sci.fidan.com> wrote:

> Nor am I above Beale for long either. My plane cruises at 160kts. That
> place is gone in no time. And yes, I do see them almost every time I fly
> through and usually they're landing or approaching to land.

	Wow, so busy.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith                          |   Directable Mirror Arrays
C:\>WIN                                     | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins.                |    licences available see
You lose and Bill collects.                 |    http://www.sohara.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#217127

FromDaniel <me@sci.fidan.com>
Date2021-02-25 03:58 -0800
Message-ID<87wnuwe4ur.fsf@sci.fidan.com>
In reply to#217116
Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> writes:

> On 2021-02-24, Daniel <me@sci.fidan.com> wrote:
>
>> Anyway, the U2 is my favorite military aircraft and whenever I fly above
>> Beale AFB, I make a point to look for U2's flying below me.
>
> I would think it would be more appropriate to look for them
> flying waaaaaay above you.  :-)

They're usually taking off or landing at beale. And I'm usually a
few thousand feet above them.

I've never spotted them climbing out. They're typically doing pattern
work when I'm over there.

-- 
Daniel
Visit me at: gopher://gcpp.world

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

Back to top | Article view | alt.folklore.computers

csiph-web