Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #163362
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: Computer theft 1971 |
| Date | 2016-05-07 20:59 +0000 |
| Organization | NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95 |
| Message-ID | <nglkvu01lb0@news3.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <42a9c618-5ad0-4b2b-85dd-55262890abe9@googlegroups.com> |
On 2016-05-07, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote: > An article in C&A covers many of today's issues of computer theft > and vandalism. > > http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/computersAndAutomation/197104.pdf > > For the life of me, I can't understand why email software allows > the automatic execution of an attached program merely upon the > opening of an email. This has allowed innumerable security breaches, > especially since saboteurs raid address books to find email accounts, > so the email looks legitimate. > > Lately, we have had attacks of ransomeware. > > I'm not even sure if the auto exec can even be turned off. (If so, > I don't know how.) One word: convenience. That trumps everything: security, cost, reliability... everything. Ask any marketroid. -- /~\ cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs) \ / I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way. X Top-posted messages will probably be ignored. See RFC1855. / \ HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored. Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Computer theft 1971 hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-05-07 12:47 -0700
Re: Computer theft 1971 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-05-07 20:59 +0000
Re: Computer theft 1971 "Simo" <dhy287@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 07:01 +1000
Re: Computer theft 1971 scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-05-07 21:26 +0000
Re: Computer theft 1971 Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-05-08 06:08 +0100
Re: Computer theft 1971 Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-05-08 08:35 +0000
Re: Computer theft 1971 Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-05-08 02:02 -0300
Re: Computer theft 1971 Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-05-08 11:08 -0400
Re: Computer theft 1971 Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-05-08 16:04 -0300
Re: Computer theft 1971 Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-05-08 17:46 -0400
Re: Computer theft 1971 Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2016-05-09 14:33 -0400
Re: Computer theft 1971 Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-05-08 06:07 +0100
Re: Computer theft 1971 Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-05-08 20:56 -0400
Re: Computer theft 1971 Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-05-09 06:06 +0100
Re: Computer theft 1971 Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2016-05-16 20:15 -0400
Re: Computer theft 1971 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-17 12:32 +0000
Re: Computer theft 1971 Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-05-23 12:36 -0400
Re: Computer theft 1971 Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2016-05-23 16:40 -0400
Re: Computer theft 1971 Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-05-23 21:40 +0100
Re: Computer theft 1971 Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-05-16 18:30 -0700
csiph-web