Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #217159
| From | Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent |
| Date | 2021-02-27 06:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <i9u7osFtnuiU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <t8rd3gh82eoi9jm1eqv6jflc2uins3oqtn@4ax.com> <87r1l3eg5s.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <s1av97$t0v$1@dont-email.me> <ctsi3gtonjtn545i7js40f74m1860eomrc@4ax.com> <81d0a1fe-e1b1-4a1a-b480-acec338612e6n@googlegroups.com> |
On 27 Feb 2021 at 06:05:04, Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote: > On Friday, February 26, 2021 at 3:21:49 PM UTC-7, J. Clarke wrote: > >> OTOH, nobody who knows how high a U-2 can fly is telling. > > No doubt. But it has been declassified that the original RFP for the > U-2 requested the ability to fly at 70,000 feet. So while it may be able > to fly higher than that, I would not expect that it normally flies _much_ > higher than that, even when doing reconnaisance. > > One can fly almost five times as high - 67 miles high - if one is flying > an X-15. And thenthere's the Space Shuttle. So, indeed, there are things > to fly that would fly higher. > > And if they still aren't talking about how high a U-2 can fly, then accurate > information about the altitude of an SR-71 Blackbird would be even harder > to find, but as the pilot is provided with an oxygen mask designed to allow > flight at 80,000 feet, it _seems_ as if it might be just the airplaine you would > want to fly if you want to look down on a U-2. An EE Canberra reached 70,310 feet in 1957.
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-13 10:57 -0500
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Marco Scholz <tool@disroot.org> - 2021-01-13 17:09 +0000
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-13 20:11 -0500
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-01-14 08:13 +0000
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-14 15:35 -0500
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2021-01-14 01:49 -0800
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-01-15 09:45 +0000
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2021-01-15 11:04 -0800
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-01-15 18:12 -0500
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-15 22:10 -0500
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-01-16 10:05 +0000
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-01-20 17:15 +0000
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Robert Netzlof <rnetzlof@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 09:55 -0800
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent usenet@only.tnx (Questor) - 2021-01-20 20:14 +0000
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-01-20 20:06 -0500
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-01-21 02:30 +0000
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-01-21 15:29 -0500
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2021-02-23 21:49 +0000
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Daniel <me@sci.fidan.com> - 2021-02-23 23:38 -0800
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-24 09:27 -0700
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-02-24 12:13 -0500
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-02-24 17:13 +0000
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-02-24 12:52 -0600
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-02-24 17:33 +0000
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-02-24 19:20 -0500
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-25 21:06 -0500
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Robert Swindells <rjs@fdy2.co.uk> - 2021-02-26 14:06 +0000
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-02-26 17:21 -0500
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2021-02-26 22:05 -0800
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2021-02-27 06:39 +0000
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2021-02-26 22:45 -0800
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-02-27 02:24 -0500
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-27 10:32 -0500
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-26 20:55 -0500
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Robert Swindells <rjs@fdy2.co.uk> - 2021-02-27 13:57 +0000
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-02-27 09:43 -0500
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-27 10:23 -0500
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2021-02-28 21:11 +0000
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2021-03-14 19:57 +0000
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2021-02-26 07:17 -0800
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-26 15:23 +0000
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2021-02-26 07:14 -0800
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-02-26 19:42 +0000
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-02-26 19:41 +0000
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Daniel <me@sci.fidan.com> - 2021-02-27 01:19 -0800
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-02-27 10:21 +0000
Re: DEC wash better than you ordinary detergent Daniel <me@sci.fidan.com> - 2021-02-25 03:58 -0800
csiph-web