Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #154500
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: "Brainfuck"? |
| Date | 2015-11-14 23:12 +0000 |
| Organization | Piglet's Pickles & Preserves |
| Message-ID | <daptejFc57pU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <n225lv$1q2$1@dont-email.me> <n2858v$e2u$1@dont-email.me> <dapm62F45c2U1@mid.individual.net> |
On 2015-11-14, Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 20:26:17 +0000, gareth wrote:
>
>> "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:n225lv$1q2$1@dont-email.me...
>>> Whereas there have been hardware implementations of the low-level
>>> primitves of FORTH, I wonder if any have been done for the "Brainfuck"
>>> language,
>>> which would seem to be a much simpler exercise?
>>
>> It was actually a serious question ...
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainfuck
>
> There's an interpreter written in TECO....!
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TECO_%28text_editor%29#Example_3
Oh, Lord.
Reminds me of the colleague from many years ago who wrote a LISP
interpreter. In MUMPS.
It was a tad ... slow.
--
Today is Pungenday, the 26th day of The Aftermath in the YOLD 3181
I don't have an attitude problem.
If you have a problem with my attitude, that's your problem.
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"Brainfuck"? "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-11-12 13:56 +0000
Re: "Brainfuck"? "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-11-14 20:26 +0000
Re: "Brainfuck"? Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-14 21:08 +0000
Re: "Brainfuck"? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-11-14 23:12 +0000
Re: "Brainfuck"? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-11-15 05:57 +0000
Re: "Brainfuck"? Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-15 10:30 +0000
csiph-web