Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #165298

Re: PDP-8 advertising

From jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com>
Newsgroups alt.folklore.computers
Subject Re: PDP-8 advertising
Date 2016-06-16 12:30 +0000
Organization "Have EDDT, will travel"
Message-ID <PM0005356445EE2899@aca40726.ipt.aol.com> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <f862681c-0909-4715-a1da-8653953bb464@googlegroups.com> <d7e3d31e-5d59-451c-90be-f07573eec261@googlegroups.com> <2506d647-d1c5-4a86-a1ef-0a598053f2be@googlegroups.com> <f862681c-0909-4715-a1da-8653953bb464@googlegroups.com> <2e13a8f2-43c4-45b1-8c08-a7a5967e4226@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 3:23:33 PM UTC-4, Quadibloc wrote:
>
>> Well, you just quoted advertisements; you didn't make
>> any controversial statements anyone would be inclined to
>> correct.
>
> Well, given it was apparently a popular machine, I was
> wondering if the advertising hype meant reality.
>
> Years ago, some kids in school would somehow get access to a
> PDP machine.  I think it was the -8 (what was the most common
> PDP model 45 years ago?)  They loved it.  Apparently, they could
> do a lot more than what we could do with BASIC or FORTRAN, or
> even mainframe assembler.  (For whatever reason, learning mainframe
> (or 1130) assembler wasn't a big deal; but learning the PDP was
> exciting to the kids back then.)
>
> Within computer geekdom, getting an entry level job in an IBM-
> mainframe computer room was 'ok', but getting a job working on a PDP
> was supercool.

I went to work for the manufacturer :-)))).


>
>
> (From my own personal perspective, when I was a kid, IBM mainframe
> computer sites were fascinating, but tended to be a bit stodgy,
> everyone was always in a tie and jacket, talked in professional
> soft voices, very polished and proper atmosphere.  In contrast, a
> PDP computer room was far more informal.
>
PDPs were built so they could work in dirty rooms.  It wasn't
until 1973 or 1974 when internal DEC PDP-10 machine rooms
started to get "clean".

/BAH

Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

PDP-8 advertising hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-05-23 16:37 -0700
  Re: PDP-8 advertising hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-06-14 13:21 -0700
    Re: PDP-8 advertising Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-06-14 21:01 +0000
      Re: PDP-8 advertising jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-06-15 13:05 +0000
        Re: PDP-8 advertising Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-06-15 16:11 +0000
    Re: PDP-8 advertising "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-14 23:18 +0100
      Re: PDP-8 advertising Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-06-15 12:19 -0700
        Re: PDP-8 advertising "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 21:09 +0100
          Re: PDP-8 advertising Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-06-15 18:03 -0700
    Re: PDP-8 advertising Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-15 08:27 -0400
    Re: PDP-8 advertising Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-06-15 12:23 -0700
      Re: PDP-8 advertising hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-06-15 13:32 -0700
        Re: PDP-8 advertising Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-06-15 21:17 +0000
          Re: PDP-8 advertising Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-06-15 15:00 -0700
        Re: PDP-8 advertising "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 22:24 +0100
          Re: PDP-8 advertising hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-06-16 13:29 -0700
        Re: PDP-8 advertising jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-06-16 12:30 +0000
          Re: PDP-8 advertising usenet@only.tnx (Questor) - 2016-06-17 07:37 +0000
            Re: PDP-8 advertising Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-06-17 08:27 +0000
              Re: PDP-8 advertising Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-06-17 08:31 +0000
        Re: PDP-8 advertising scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-06-16 12:48 +0000
        Re: PDP-8 advertising usenet@only.tnx (Questor) - 2016-06-17 03:37 +0000
          Re: PDP-8 advertising Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-06-17 07:40 +0000
            Re: PDP-8 advertising Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-06-17 12:32 -0400
              Re: PDP-8 advertising "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-06-18 09:41 -0500
                Re: PDP-8 advertising Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-06-18 15:34 -0400
                Re: PDP-8 advertising hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-06-18 13:25 -0700
          Re: PDP-8 advertising jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-06-17 12:53 +0000
            Re: PDP-8 advertising usenet@only.tnx (Questor) - 2016-06-18 07:10 +0000
              Re: PDP-8 advertising barrym95838@yahoo.com - 2016-06-18 01:07 -0700
    Re: PDP-8 advertising Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-06-16 10:03 -0400
      Re: PDP-8 advertising hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-06-16 13:33 -0700
        Re: PDP-8 advertising Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-06-16 17:24 -0400
        Re: PDP-8 advertising Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-06-16 18:28 -0400

csiph-web