Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #162516

Re: IBM's 96 column punch card (was System/3)?

From Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com>
Newsgroups alt.folklore.computers
Subject Re: IBM's 96 column punch card (was System/3)?
Date 2016-04-15 10:39 -0700
Organization Wheeler&Wheeler
Message-ID <87zisuvkj4.fsf@garlic.com> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <b47f635b-2d97-43fc-930e-44efd4095524@x6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com> <rLydnY6SUPi92KzXnZ2dnUVZ_o6dnZ2d@indra.net> <h0s60002f08@news2.newsguy.com> <bb817ca8-d579-4fb2-a938-68bd93c5001e@w40g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <f892484c-655a-407e-aa31-7b373ea72844@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> writes:
> Nobody ever took advantage of the IBM principle of moving the letters
> sideways to allow a line printer to print with proportional spacing. I
> find that a pity.

past posts mentioning 1403 train for printing logic diagrams, letters
sideways and RPQ to print across page performation. sideways printing
http://manana.garlic.com/~lynn/2005k.html#59 Book on computer architecture for beginners
http://manana.garlic.com/~lynn/2005l.html#0 Book on computer architecture for beginners
http://manana.garlic.com/~lynn/2012j.html#82 printer history Languages influenced by PL/1

-- 
virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970

Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: IBM's 96 column punch card (was System/3)? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-04-15 07:09 -0700
  Re: IBM's 96 column punch card (was System/3)? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-04-15 17:20 +0000
    Re: IBM's 96 column punch card (was System/3)? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-04-15 19:03 +0000
    Re: IBM's 96 column punch card (was System/3)? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-15 15:24 -0400
    Re: IBM's 96 column punch card (was System/3)? Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2016-04-17 10:44 -0400
      Re: IBM's 96 column punch card (was System/3)? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 17:57 +0100
  Re: IBM's 96 column punch card (was System/3)? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-04-15 10:39 -0700

csiph-web