Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.fan.rush-limbaugh > #2670072 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-06-22 11:00 -0700 |
| Last post | 2023-06-22 17:04 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 55 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 11:00 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 12:02 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 12:26 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 12:32 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 12:47 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 12:54 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 13:18 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 13:36 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 23:24 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-23 10:53 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-23 11:39 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-23 11:43 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-23 13:30 -0700
Re: Missing Sub "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 13:38 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-23 14:04 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-23 14:16 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-23 14:40 -0700
Re: Missing Sub "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 14:52 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-23 16:00 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-02 15:27 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-24 10:19 -0700
Re: Missing Sub "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 13:56 -0700
Re: Missing Sub -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2023-06-22 13:28 -0700
Re: Missing Sub Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2023-06-22 16:54 -0700
Re: Missing Sub pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2023-06-23 11:55 +0000
Re: Missing Sub Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 09:19 -0400
Re: Missing Sub Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 09:18 -0400
Re: Missing Sub -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2023-06-23 08:25 -0700
Re: Missing Sub Lou Bricano <lb@cap.con> - 2023-06-23 10:40 -0700
Re: Missing Sub -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2023-06-23 16:59 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 12:50 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 23:10 -0700
Re: Missing Sub Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-06-23 16:15 +1000
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 23:43 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-02 18:55 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-03 10:24 -0700
Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-03 14:40 -0700
Re: Missing Sub Yak <Yak@inbox.com> - 2023-06-22 15:39 -0400
Re: Missing Sub Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizon.net> - 2023-06-23 02:09 +0000
Re: Missing Sub Yak <Yak@inbox.com> - 2023-06-23 08:34 -0400
Re: Missing Sub -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2023-06-23 05:50 -0700
Re: Missing Sub Yak <Yak@inbox.com> - 2023-06-23 08:59 -0400
Re: Missing Sub -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2023-06-23 08:23 -0700
Re: Missing Sub David Hartung <shitbag.hartung@shitbags.r.us> - 2023-06-23 10:40 -0700
Re: Missing Sub Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizon.net> - 2023-06-23 13:02 +0000
Re: Missing Sub Yak <Yak@inbox.com> - 2023-06-23 09:34 -0400
Re: Missing Sub Lou Bricano <lb@cap.con> - 2023-06-23 10:39 -0700
Re: Missing Sub Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 19:48 -0400
Re: Missing Sub Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2023-06-23 17:30 -0700
Re: Missing Sub Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> - 2023-06-24 00:38 +0000
Re: Missing Sub Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizon.net> - 2023-06-24 01:44 +0000
Re: Missing Sub Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> - 2023-06-24 01:59 +0000
Re: Missing Sub Robert Youngdale <another.jaques@idiot> - 2023-06-23 19:03 -0700
Re: Missing Sub "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-22 13:10 -0700
Re: Missing Sub Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2023-06-22 17:04 -0700
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-22 11:00 -0700 |
| Subject | Missing Sub |
| Message-ID | <64948C4A.5561@ix.netcom.com> |
It doesn't have a toilet? It uses a old Amazon cheap $30.00 video game controller? (free shipping) Why would you trust Nasa to build dat thing??? an Xbox contoller makes it go left? no fat people allowed in dat thing, right? don't lean on the window... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-22 12:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <64949AD1.1189@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2670072 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > It doesn't have a toilet? > > It uses a old Amazon cheap $30.00 video game controller? (free shipping) > > Why would you trust Nasa to build dat thing??? > > an Xbox contoller makes it go left? > > no fat people allowed in dat thing, right? > > don't lean on the window... I want the names and pictures of those NASA guys who worked on dat thing... i wanna see what stupid people look like. Trust the Science. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-22 12:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6494A05E.67A9@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2670081 |
So, now 'they' say the passengers didn't know what happen when it imploded... then...what was all that BANGING they heard before? The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > It doesn't have a toilet? > > > > It uses a old Amazon cheap $30.00 video game controller? (free shipping) > > > > Why would you trust Nasa to build dat thing??? > > > > an Xbox contoller makes it go left? > > > > no fat people allowed in dat thing, right? > > > > don't lean on the window... > > I want the names and pictures of those NASA guys who worked on dat > thing... > > i wanna see what stupid people look like. > > Trust the Science. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-22 12:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6494A1D8.73ED@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2670084 |
...maybe they banged a little too hard? broke the window to swim...up? The Starmaker wrote: > > So, now 'they' say the passengers didn't know what happen when it > imploded... > > then...what was all that BANGING they heard before? > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > It doesn't have a toilet? > > > > > > It uses a old Amazon cheap $30.00 video game controller? (free shipping) > > > > > > Why would you trust Nasa to build dat thing??? > > > > > > an Xbox contoller makes it go left? > > > > > > no fat people allowed in dat thing, right? > > > > > > don't lean on the window... > > > > I want the names and pictures of those NASA guys who worked on dat > > thing... > > > > i wanna see what stupid people look like. > > > > Trust the Science. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-22 12:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6494A54B.4AA8@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2670085 |
https://fortune.com/2023/06/21/titan-titanic-missing-sub-david-lochridge-safety-concerns-sacked-oceangate-stockton-rush-hamish-harding/ During the meeting, Lochridge said he discovered that the Titan’s viewport was certified to a pressure of 1,300 meters below sea level. OceanGate intended to take passengers on the Titan down to depths of 4,000 meters. According to OceanGate’s website, the Titan reaches a maximum depth of 3,800 meters (12,500 feet) on its Titanic dives. However, Lochridge alleged that the company refused to pay for the Titan’s manufacturer to build a viewport that would meet the required standards for these depths. He also said in the lawsuit that paying passengers would not be aware or informed of the Titan’s “experimental viewport design,” the lack of sufficient safety testing of the hull, or that hazardous flammable materials had been used in its construction. He said he strongly urged the company to use a classification agency like the American Bureau of Shipping to inspect and certify the Titan. The Starmaker wrote: > > ...maybe they banged a little too hard? > > broke the window to swim...up? > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > So, now 'they' say the passengers didn't know what happen when it > > imploded... > > > > then...what was all that BANGING they heard before? > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > It doesn't have a toilet? > > > > > > > > It uses a old Amazon cheap $30.00 video game controller? (free shipping) > > > > > > > > Why would you trust Nasa to build dat thing??? > > > > > > > > an Xbox contoller makes it go left? > > > > > > > > no fat people allowed in dat thing, right? > > > > > > > > don't lean on the window... > > > > > > I want the names and pictures of those NASA guys who worked on dat > > > thing... > > > > > > i wanna see what stupid people look like. > > > > > > Trust the Science. > > > > > > -- > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > and challenge > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-22 12:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6494A70D.26C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2670090 |
I bet the other passengers killed the CEO guy... they banged his head against the wall.. they might have been a little angry at him... WHAT? AMAZON $39.99???? when is the netflix movie coming out? The Starmaker wrote: > > https://fortune.com/2023/06/21/titan-titanic-missing-sub-david-lochridge-safety-concerns-sacked-oceangate-stockton-rush-hamish-harding/ > During the meeting, Lochridge said he discovered that the Titan’s > viewport was certified to a pressure of 1,300 meters below sea level. > OceanGate intended to take passengers on the Titan down to depths of > 4,000 meters. > > According to OceanGate’s website, the Titan reaches a maximum depth of > 3,800 meters (12,500 feet) on its Titanic dives. > > However, Lochridge alleged that the company refused to pay for the > Titan’s manufacturer to build a viewport that would meet the required > standards for these depths. > > He also said in the lawsuit that paying passengers would not be aware or > informed of the Titan’s “experimental viewport design,” the lack of > sufficient safety testing of the hull, or that hazardous flammable > materials had been used in its construction. He said he strongly urged > the company to use a classification agency like the American Bureau of > Shipping to inspect and certify the Titan. > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > ...maybe they banged a little too hard? > > > > broke the window to swim...up? > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > So, now 'they' say the passengers didn't know what happen when it > > > imploded... > > > > > > then...what was all that BANGING they heard before? > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > It doesn't have a toilet? > > > > > > > > > > It uses a old Amazon cheap $30.00 video game controller? (free shipping) > > > > > > > > > > Why would you trust Nasa to build dat thing??? > > > > > > > > > > an Xbox contoller makes it go left? > > > > > > > > > > no fat people allowed in dat thing, right? > > > > > > > > > > don't lean on the window... > > > > > > > > I want the names and pictures of those NASA guys who worked on dat > > > > thing... > > > > > > > > i wanna see what stupid people look like. > > > > > > > > Trust the Science. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > and challenge > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > -- > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > and challenge > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-22 13:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6494AC9B.523E@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2670093 |
anybody gots Nexflix phone number? I got the movie....
fuck Hollywood..
Title: "Under Pressure"
Logline:
As the missing Titan submersible's passengers struggle with dwindling
oxygen supplies and the desperate search for survival, tensions
reach a breaking point, leading to a fight for dominance and a battle
against the odds.
Main Characters:
David Lochridge: Former director of marine operations at OceanGate,
striving to make amends and rescue the passengers.
Hamish Harding: A resourceful billionaire entrepreneur, determined
to survive and protect his fellow passengers.
Shahzada Dawood: A conflicted businessman, torn between
self-preservation and the responsibility towards his son and fellow
passengers.
Suleman Dawood: Shahzada's 19-year-old son, facing the harsh reality
of the situation and striving to keep hope alive.
Paul-Henry Nargeolet: A seasoned explorer, relying on his experience
and knowledge to navigate the treacherous circumstances.
Mini Synopsis:
As the search for the missing Titan submersible continues, tensions
escalate inside the confined space of the submersible. With oxygen
levels running dangerously low,
fear and desperation permeate the atmosphere. The once unified group of
passengers finds themselves on the brink of survival, testing their
endurance and pushing their limits.
The pressure of the dire situation leads to a heated confrontation among
the passengers. Frayed nerves, conflicting viewpoints, and the struggle
for
control spark a fight for dominance. Frustrations, fears, and anger
explode, causing chaos within the submersible's cramped quarters.
Amidst the physical altercation, alliances shift, and new bonds form as
individuals realize the significance of unity in the face of impending
disaster.
David Lochridge, filled with regret for his earlier warnings ignored by
OceanGate, attempts to mediate the conflict and restore a sense of
cooperation among the passengers.
However, the fight serves as a turning point, forcing the passengers to
confront their mortality and the need for collective action. As
they grapple with their emotions, they also discover hidden strengths
and resourcefulness within themselves. Together, they must find a way to
overcome their differences, maintain their sanity, and work towards a
common goal of survival.
"Under Pressure" explores the complexities of human nature, resilience,
and the bonds formed under extreme circumstances. Will the passengers
overcome their internal strife, come together, and find a way to endure
until rescue arrives, or will their actions lead to further catastrophe
in their fight for survival?
Passenger 1: (Panicking) We can't just sit here! We're running out of
oxygen! We need to do something!
Passenger 2: (Agitated) What do you propose we do? There's nowhere to
go, and we can't control the situation. We have to trust that the search
teams will find us soon.
Passenger 3: (Angry) Trust? We trusted OceanGate, and look where it got
us! Ignored safety concerns, a submersible with flaws! We're paying the
price for their negligence!
Passenger 4: (Fearful) We can't waste time blaming each other. We need
to focus on conserving what little oxygen we have left and staying calm.
Passenger 1: (Voice trembling) How can you expect us to stay calm when
we're trapped down here with no way out? We're going to die if we don't
take action!
Passenger 2: (Trying to reason) Look, fighting among ourselves won't
solve anything. Let's try to come up with a plan together. Maybe there's
something we haven't thought of.
Passenger 3: (Defiant) A plan? We're at the mercy of OceanGate's
incompetence! They never should have allowed us on this submersible in
the first place!
Passenger 4: (Desperate) We can't change the past. Right now, we need to
focus on finding a way to make our oxygen last. Maybe we can ration it
somehow, take turns breathing from the emergency tanks.
Passenger 1: (Agitated) Rationing won't do us any good if we're still
stuck down here! We need to take matters into our own hands and find a
way out!
Passenger 2: (Urgently) Listen, I understand your frustration, but
fighting won't get us anywhere. Let's stay calm and try to conserve our
energy. We have to believe that help is on the way.
Passenger 3: (Resentful) Easy for you to say! You're not the one who
warned them about the safety flaws. You're not the one who feels
responsible for all of this!
Passenger 4: (Softly) We're all in this together now. Blaming each other
won't change our situation. Let's focus on supporting one another and
finding strength in our unity.
The dialogue reflects the various emotional states and conflicts among
the passengers as they grapple with their dire circumstances. While some
express
anger and the need for immediate action, others emphasize the
importance of staying calm and conserving resources. Throughout the
exchange, there is a
call for unity and a shift towards finding practical solutions and
supporting each other in their fight for survival.
Now, i gotta write the banging noise part...
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> I bet the other passengers killed the CEO guy...
>
> they banged his head against the wall..
>
> they might have been a little angry at him...
>
> WHAT? AMAZON $39.99????
>
> when is the netflix movie coming out?
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > https://fortune.com/2023/06/21/titan-titanic-missing-sub-david-lochridge-safety-concerns-sacked-oceangate-stockton-rush-hamish-harding/
> > During the meeting, Lochridge said he discovered that the Titan’s
> > viewport was certified to a pressure of 1,300 meters below sea level.
> > OceanGate intended to take passengers on the Titan down to depths of
> > 4,000 meters.
> >
> > According to OceanGate’s website, the Titan reaches a maximum depth of
> > 3,800 meters (12,500 feet) on its Titanic dives.
> >
> > However, Lochridge alleged that the company refused to pay for the
> > Titan’s manufacturer to build a viewport that would meet the required
> > standards for these depths.
> >
> > He also said in the lawsuit that paying passengers would not be aware or
> > informed of the Titan’s “experimental viewport design,” the lack of
> > sufficient safety testing of the hull, or that hazardous flammable
> > materials had been used in its construction. He said he strongly urged
> > the company to use a classification agency like the American Bureau of
> > Shipping to inspect and certify the Titan.
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > ...maybe they banged a little too hard?
> > >
> > > broke the window to swim...up?
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > So, now 'they' say the passengers didn't know what happen when it
> > > > imploded...
> > > >
> > > > then...what was all that BANGING they heard before?
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It doesn't have a toilet?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It uses a old Amazon cheap $30.00 video game controller? (free shipping)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why would you trust Nasa to build dat thing???
> > > > > >
> > > > > > an Xbox contoller makes it go left?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > no fat people allowed in dat thing, right?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > don't lean on the window...
> > > > >
> > > > > I want the names and pictures of those NASA guys who worked on dat
> > > > > thing...
> > > > >
> > > > > i wanna see what stupid people look like.
> > > > >
> > > > > Trust the Science.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > and challenge
> > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > and challenge
> > > > the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge
> the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-22 13:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6494B0CE.6226@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2670100 |
Passenger 1: (Panicking) We can't just wait here! We're running out of time! We need to find a way out! Passenger 2: (Agitated) Breaking the window won't solve anything! We're deep underwater, and it will only flood the submersible and endanger us further! Passenger 3: (Desperate) We're desperate! We can't just sit here and do nothing! We have to take matters into our own hands! Passenger 1: (Frantic) I don't care anymore! If we stay here, we'll suffocate! We need fresh air, even if it means taking our chances with the water! Passenger 2: (Trying to reason) Breaking the window will put all our lives at risk. We need to stay calm and think of another way to signal for help or attract attention. Passenger 3: (Frustrated) We've been waiting for too long! Nobody is coming! We have to make them notice us, even if it means risking everything! Passenger 1: (Determined) I'm not going down without a fight! If breaking the window is our only chance, then I'm willing to take that risk! Passenger 2: (Urgently) Wait! Let's think this through! We still have options. We can try to use the emergency distress signals, make noise, anything that might attract rescuers. Passenger 3: (Impatient) We don't have time for that! We can't rely on others anymore. It's up to us to save ourselves! Passenger 1: (Defiant) I'm done waiting for a rescue that may never come! I'd rather take my chances with breaking the window and trying to swim to the surface! Passenger 2: (Desperate) Please, let's reconsider! Breaking the window is a dangerous move. We need to stay rational and find a way to increase our chances of survival. Passenger 3: (Agitated) Survival is about taking risks! We can't just sit here and hope for the best. We have to be proactive and fight for our lives! As tensions rise and desperation takes hold, the passengers debate the best course of action. While one passenger is determined to break the window and swim to the surface, the others try to reason and explore alternative options. The dialogue portrays the conflicting emotions and the struggle between immediate action and cautious decision-making in a high-stakes situation. Passenger 1: (Curious) Hey, how much did you pay for your ticket to board this submersible? Passenger 2: (Surprised) Why do you want to know? We're in a life-threatening situation here! Passenger 1: (Insistent) I'm just curious. We all paid a hefty sum to be on this voyage. I'm wondering if it was worth it. Passenger 3: (Anxious) Seriously? We're stuck in a submerged vessel, running out of oxygen, and you're concerned about ticket prices? Passenger 1: (Defensive) I didn't mean it like that. I'm just trying to distract myself from the fear and uncertainty. Passenger 2: (Skeptical) Well, I'll tell you. I paid a small fortune to be here. It was supposed to be a once-in-a-lifetime experience. Passenger 3: (Bitter) Yeah, a once-in-a-lifetime experience that might actually be our last. Great investment, huh? Passenger 1: (Regretful) I didn't realize it would come to this. I thought we would explore the depths of the ocean, not fight for our lives. Passenger 2: (Resigned) Money can't buy safety or guarantee a smooth journey. It's a harsh lesson to learn. Passenger 3: (Reflective) In the grand scheme of things, the cost of the ticket doesn't matter anymore. Our focus should be on finding a way out of here. Passenger 1: (Somber) You're right. I apologize for bringing it up. Our survival is what truly matters now. As the passengers confront the question about ticket prices, the conversation quickly shifts to the gravity of their situation. They acknowledge the insignificance of the monetary value in the face of a life-threatening crisis. The dialogue highlights the realization that their focus needs to be on survival and finding a way out rather than dwelling on past expenses. The Starmaker wrote: > > anybody gots Nexflix phone number? I got the movie.... > > fuck Hollywood.. > > Title: "Under Pressure" > > Logline: > As the missing Titan submersible's passengers struggle with dwindling > oxygen supplies and the desperate search for survival, tensions > reach a breaking point, leading to a fight for dominance and a battle > against the odds. > > Main Characters: > > David Lochridge: Former director of marine operations at OceanGate, > striving to make amends and rescue the passengers. > > Hamish Harding: A resourceful billionaire entrepreneur, determined > to survive and protect his fellow passengers. > > Shahzada Dawood: A conflicted businessman, torn between > self-preservation and the responsibility towards his son and fellow > passengers. > > Suleman Dawood: Shahzada's 19-year-old son, facing the harsh reality > of the situation and striving to keep hope alive. > > Paul-Henry Nargeolet: A seasoned explorer, relying on his experience > and knowledge to navigate the treacherous circumstances. > > Mini Synopsis: > As the search for the missing Titan submersible continues, tensions > escalate inside the confined space of the submersible. With oxygen > levels running dangerously low, > fear and desperation permeate the atmosphere. The once unified group of > passengers finds themselves on the brink of survival, testing their > endurance and pushing their limits. > > The pressure of the dire situation leads to a heated confrontation among > the passengers. Frayed nerves, conflicting viewpoints, and the struggle > for > control spark a fight for dominance. Frustrations, fears, and anger > explode, causing chaos within the submersible's cramped quarters. > > Amidst the physical altercation, alliances shift, and new bonds form as > individuals realize the significance of unity in the face of impending > disaster. > David Lochridge, filled with regret for his earlier warnings ignored by > OceanGate, attempts to mediate the conflict and restore a sense of > cooperation among the passengers. > > However, the fight serves as a turning point, forcing the passengers to > confront their mortality and the need for collective action. As > they grapple with their emotions, they also discover hidden strengths > and resourcefulness within themselves. Together, they must find a way to > overcome their differences, maintain their sanity, and work towards a > common goal of survival. > > "Under Pressure" explores the complexities of human nature, resilience, > and the bonds formed under extreme circumstances. Will the passengers > overcome their internal strife, come together, and find a way to endure > until rescue arrives, or will their actions lead to further catastrophe > in their fight for survival? > > Passenger 1: (Panicking) We can't just sit here! We're running out of > oxygen! We need to do something! > > Passenger 2: (Agitated) What do you propose we do? There's nowhere to > go, and we can't control the situation. We have to trust that the search > teams will find us soon. > > Passenger 3: (Angry) Trust? We trusted OceanGate, and look where it got > us! Ignored safety concerns, a submersible with flaws! We're paying the > price for their negligence! > > Passenger 4: (Fearful) We can't waste time blaming each other. We need > to focus on conserving what little oxygen we have left and staying calm. > > Passenger 1: (Voice trembling) How can you expect us to stay calm when > we're trapped down here with no way out? We're going to die if we don't > take action! > > Passenger 2: (Trying to reason) Look, fighting among ourselves won't > solve anything. Let's try to come up with a plan together. Maybe there's > something we haven't thought of. > > Passenger 3: (Defiant) A plan? We're at the mercy of OceanGate's > incompetence! They never should have allowed us on this submersible in > the first place! > > Passenger 4: (Desperate) We can't change the past. Right now, we need to > focus on finding a way to make our oxygen last. Maybe we can ration it > somehow, take turns breathing from the emergency tanks. > > Passenger 1: (Agitated) Rationing won't do us any good if we're still > stuck down here! We need to take matters into our own hands and find a > way out! > > Passenger 2: (Urgently) Listen, I understand your frustration, but > fighting won't get us anywhere. Let's stay calm and try to conserve our > energy. We have to believe that help is on the way. > > Passenger 3: (Resentful) Easy for you to say! You're not the one who > warned them about the safety flaws. You're not the one who feels > responsible for all of this! > > Passenger 4: (Softly) We're all in this together now. Blaming each other > won't change our situation. Let's focus on supporting one another and > finding strength in our unity. > > The dialogue reflects the various emotional states and conflicts among > the passengers as they grapple with their dire circumstances. While some > express > anger and the need for immediate action, others emphasize the > importance of staying calm and conserving resources. Throughout the > exchange, there is a > call for unity and a shift towards finding practical solutions and > supporting each other in their fight for survival. > > Now, i gotta write the banging noise part... > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > I bet the other passengers killed the CEO guy... > > > > they banged his head against the wall.. > > > > they might have been a little angry at him... > > > > WHAT? AMAZON $39.99???? > > > > when is the netflix movie coming out? > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > https://fortune.com/2023/06/21/titan-titanic-missing-sub-david-lochridge-safety-concerns-sacked-oceangate-stockton-rush-hamish-harding/ > > > During the meeting, Lochridge said he discovered that the Titan’s > > > viewport was certified to a pressure of 1,300 meters below sea level. > > > OceanGate intended to take passengers on the Titan down to depths of > > > 4,000 meters. > > > > > > According to OceanGate’s website, the Titan reaches a maximum depth of > > > 3,800 meters (12,500 feet) on its Titanic dives. > > > > > > However, Lochridge alleged that the company refused to pay for the > > > Titan’s manufacturer to build a viewport that would meet the required > > > standards for these depths. > > > > > > He also said in the lawsuit that paying passengers would not be aware or > > > informed of the Titan’s “experimental viewport design,” the lack of > > > sufficient safety testing of the hull, or that hazardous flammable > > > materials had been used in its construction. He said he strongly urged > > > the company to use a classification agency like the American Bureau of > > > Shipping to inspect and certify the Titan. > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > ...maybe they banged a little too hard? > > > > > > > > broke the window to swim...up? > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > So, now 'they' say the passengers didn't know what happen when it > > > > > imploded... > > > > > > > > > > then...what was all that BANGING they heard before? > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It doesn't have a toilet? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It uses a old Amazon cheap $30.00 video game controller? (free shipping) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why would you trust Nasa to build dat thing??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > an Xbox contoller makes it go left? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no fat people allowed in dat thing, right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't lean on the window... > > > > > > > > > > > > I want the names and pictures of those NASA guys who worked on dat > > > > > > thing... > > > > > > > > > > > > i wanna see what stupid people look like. > > > > > > > > > > > > Trust the Science. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > > > and challenge > > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > > and challenge > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > and challenge > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > -- > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > and challenge > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-22 23:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <64953AB1.299D@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2670090 |
Okay, I'll tell you what happened... the guys at the top knew that somehow they had broken stuff, the guys at the top didn't want to hear that they had broken stuff. They didn't want to hear about the difficulties of the engineers - the fact that the sub might not work, and so on. It's better if they don't hear it, so they can be much more "honest" when they're trying to sell tickets. - the engineers and scien- tists on the one hand and management on the other - is the cause of the deterioration in cooperation, which, as you've seen, produced a calamity. "...the company refused to pay for the Titan’s manufacturer to build a viewport that would meet the required standards for these depths." "...paying passengers would not be aware or informed of the Titan’s “experimental viewport design,.." https://fortune.com/2023/06/21/titan-titanic-missing-sub-david-lochridge-safety-concerns-sacked-oceangate-stockton-rush-hamish-harding/ The Starmaker wrote: > > https://fortune.com/2023/06/21/titan-titanic-missing-sub-david-lochridge-safety-concerns-sacked-oceangate-stockton-rush-hamish-harding/ > During the meeting, Lochridge said he discovered that the Titan’s > viewport was certified to a pressure of 1,300 meters below sea level. > OceanGate intended to take passengers on the Titan down to depths of > 4,000 meters. > > According to OceanGate’s website, the Titan reaches a maximum depth of > 3,800 meters (12,500 feet) on its Titanic dives. > > However, Lochridge alleged that the company refused to pay for the > Titan’s manufacturer to build a viewport that would meet the required > standards for these depths. > > He also said in the lawsuit that paying passengers would not be aware or > informed of the Titan’s “experimental viewport design,” the lack of > sufficient safety testing of the hull, or that hazardous flammable > materials had been used in its construction. He said he strongly urged > the company to use a classification agency like the American Bureau of > Shipping to inspect and certify the Titan. > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > ...maybe they banged a little too hard? > > > > broke the window to swim...up? > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > So, now 'they' say the passengers didn't know what happen when it > > > imploded... > > > > > > then...what was all that BANGING they heard before? > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > It doesn't have a toilet? > > > > > > > > > > It uses a old Amazon cheap $30.00 video game controller? (free shipping) > > > > > > > > > > Why would you trust Nasa to build dat thing??? > > > > > > > > > > an Xbox contoller makes it go left? > > > > > > > > > > no fat people allowed in dat thing, right? > > > > > > > > > > don't lean on the window... > > > > > > > > I want the names and pictures of those NASA guys who worked on dat > > > > thing... > > > > > > > > i wanna see what stupid people look like. > > > > > > > > Trust the Science. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > and challenge > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > -- > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > and challenge > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 10:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6495DC0E.2D75@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2670305 |
If you want an easy million dollars... he charged you $250,000.00 a ticket and he sold 4 tickets dats a million dollars! You are suppose to hide the old X-box controller.. and the fact the sub doesn't work. (just sign here -don't read the small print) The five passengers who boarded the doomed OceanGate Titan submersible that imploded on its way to the wreck of the Titanic signed an iron-clad agreement that protects the company from any liability for what could happen to the vessel, including death. The three-page document spells out the risks that passengers take when riding in the 23,000-pound Titan, including eye-popping wording such as how the craft “has not been approved or certified by any regulatory body and may be constructed of materials that have not been widely used on human occupied submersible.” https://nypost.com/2023/06/23/read-the-death-waiver-doomed-titanic-sub-tourists-signed/ no refunds. Did Captain Kirk ever ride in dat thing? The Starmaker wrote: > > Okay, I'll tell you what happened... > > the > guys > at > the > top > knew > that > somehow > they > had > broken stuff, > the > guys > at > the > top > didn't > want > to > hear > that > they > had > broken stuff. > > They > didn't > want > to > hear > about > the > difficulties > of > the > engineers > - > the > fact > that > the > sub > might > not > work, > and > so > on. > > It's > better > if > they > don't > hear > it, > so > they > can > be > much > more > "honest" > when > they're > trying > to > sell > tickets. > - > > the > engineers > and > scien- > tists > on > the > one > hand and > management > on > the > other > - > is > the > cause > of > the > deterioration > in > cooperation, > which, > as > you've > seen, > produced > a calamity. > > "...the company refused to pay for the Titan’s manufacturer to build a viewport that would meet the required standards for these depths." > "...paying passengers would not be aware or informed of the Titan’s “experimental viewport design,.." > https://fortune.com/2023/06/21/titan-titanic-missing-sub-david-lochridge-safety-concerns-sacked-oceangate-stockton-rush-hamish-harding/ > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > https://fortune.com/2023/06/21/titan-titanic-missing-sub-david-lochridge-safety-concerns-sacked-oceangate-stockton-rush-hamish-harding/ > > During the meeting, Lochridge said he discovered that the Titan’s > > viewport was certified to a pressure of 1,300 meters below sea level. > > OceanGate intended to take passengers on the Titan down to depths of > > 4,000 meters. > > > > According to OceanGate’s website, the Titan reaches a maximum depth of > > 3,800 meters (12,500 feet) on its Titanic dives. > > > > However, Lochridge alleged that the company refused to pay for the > > Titan’s manufacturer to build a viewport that would meet the required > > standards for these depths. > > > > He also said in the lawsuit that paying passengers would not be aware or > > informed of the Titan’s “experimental viewport design,” the lack of > > sufficient safety testing of the hull, or that hazardous flammable > > materials had been used in its construction. He said he strongly urged > > the company to use a classification agency like the American Bureau of > > Shipping to inspect and certify the Titan. > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > ...maybe they banged a little too hard? > > > > > > broke the window to swim...up? > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > So, now 'they' say the passengers didn't know what happen when it > > > > imploded... > > > > > > > > then...what was all that BANGING they heard before? > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > It doesn't have a toilet? > > > > > > > > > > > > It uses a old Amazon cheap $30.00 video game controller? (free shipping) > > > > > > > > > > > > Why would you trust Nasa to build dat thing??? > > > > > > > > > > > > an Xbox contoller makes it go left? > > > > > > > > > > > > no fat people allowed in dat thing, right? > > > > > > > > > > > > don't lean on the window... > > > > > > > > > > I want the names and pictures of those NASA guys who worked on dat > > > > > thing... > > > > > > > > > > i wanna see what stupid people look like. > > > > > > > > > > Trust the Science. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > > and challenge > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > and challenge > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > -- > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > and challenge > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 11:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6495E6C5.4CE9@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2670480 |
i say wat happen is da guy with the x-box controller dropped it and it broke. and he forgot to buy another one... and they killed him. The Starmaker wrote: > > If you want an easy million dollars... > > he charged you $250,000.00 a ticket > > and he sold 4 tickets > > dats a million dollars! > > You are suppose to hide > the old X-box controller.. > > and the fact the sub doesn't work. > > (just sign here -don't read the small print) > > The five passengers who boarded the doomed OceanGate Titan submersible that imploded on its way to the wreck > of the Titanic signed an iron-clad agreement that protects the company from any liability for what could happen > to the vessel, including death. > > The three-page document spells out the risks that passengers take when riding in the 23,000-pound Titan, including > eye-popping wording such as how the craft “has not been approved or certified by any regulatory body and may be > constructed of materials that have not been widely used on human occupied submersible.” > > https://nypost.com/2023/06/23/read-the-death-waiver-doomed-titanic-sub-tourists-signed/ > > no refunds. > > Did Captain Kirk ever ride in dat thing? > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Okay, I'll tell you what happened... > > > > the > > guys > > at > > the > > top > > knew > > that > > somehow > > they > > had > > broken stuff, > > the > > guys > > at > > the > > top > > didn't > > want > > to > > hear > > that > > they > > had > > broken stuff. > > > > They > > didn't > > want > > to > > hear > > about > > the > > difficulties > > of > > the > > engineers > > - > > the > > fact > > that > > the > > sub > > might > > not > > work, > > and > > so > > on. > > > > It's > > better > > if > > they > > don't > > hear > > it, > > so > > they > > can > > be > > much > > more > > "honest" > > when > > they're > > trying > > to > > sell > > tickets. > > - > > > > the > > engineers > > and > > scien- > > tists > > on > > the > > one > > hand and > > management > > on > > the > > other > > - > > is > > the > > cause > > of > > the > > deterioration > > in > > cooperation, > > which, > > as > > you've > > seen, > > produced > > a calamity. > > > > "...the company refused to pay for the Titan’s manufacturer to build a viewport that would meet the required standards for these depths." > > "...paying passengers would not be aware or informed of the Titan’s “experimental viewport design,.." > > https://fortune.com/2023/06/21/titan-titanic-missing-sub-david-lochridge-safety-concerns-sacked-oceangate-stockton-rush-hamish-harding/ > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > https://fortune.com/2023/06/21/titan-titanic-missing-sub-david-lochridge-safety-concerns-sacked-oceangate-stockton-rush-hamish-harding/ > > > During the meeting, Lochridge said he discovered that the Titan’s > > > viewport was certified to a pressure of 1,300 meters below sea level. > > > OceanGate intended to take passengers on the Titan down to depths of > > > 4,000 meters. > > > > > > According to OceanGate’s website, the Titan reaches a maximum depth of > > > 3,800 meters (12,500 feet) on its Titanic dives. > > > > > > However, Lochridge alleged that the company refused to pay for the > > > Titan’s manufacturer to build a viewport that would meet the required > > > standards for these depths. > > > > > > He also said in the lawsuit that paying passengers would not be aware or > > > informed of the Titan’s “experimental viewport design,” the lack of > > > sufficient safety testing of the hull, or that hazardous flammable > > > materials had been used in its construction. He said he strongly urged > > > the company to use a classification agency like the American Bureau of > > > Shipping to inspect and certify the Titan. > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > ...maybe they banged a little too hard? > > > > > > > > broke the window to swim...up? > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > So, now 'they' say the passengers didn't know what happen when it > > > > > imploded... > > > > > > > > > > then...what was all that BANGING they heard before? > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It doesn't have a toilet? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It uses a old Amazon cheap $30.00 video game controller? (free shipping) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why would you trust Nasa to build dat thing??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > an Xbox contoller makes it go left? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no fat people allowed in dat thing, right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't lean on the window... > > > > > > > > > > > > I want the names and pictures of those NASA guys who worked on dat > > > > > > thing... > > > > > > > > > > > > i wanna see what stupid people look like. > > > > > > > > > > > > Trust the Science. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > > > and challenge > > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > > and challenge > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > and challenge > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > -- > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > and challenge > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 11:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6495E7BB.4B05@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2670492 |
Now, whose idea was it to use an x-box toy controller to navigate the sub? It had to be NASA...it couldn't be anybody else. Only NASA thinks of things like that! The Starmaker wrote: > > i say wat happen is da guy with the x-box controller dropped it and it > broke. > > and he forgot to buy another one... > > and they killed him. > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > If you want an easy million dollars... > > > > he charged you $250,000.00 a ticket > > > > and he sold 4 tickets > > > > dats a million dollars! > > > > You are suppose to hide > > the old X-box controller.. > > > > and the fact the sub doesn't work. > > > > (just sign here -don't read the small print) > > > > The five passengers who boarded the doomed OceanGate Titan submersible that imploded on its way to the wreck > > of the Titanic signed an iron-clad agreement that protects the company from any liability for what could happen > > to the vessel, including death. > > > > The three-page document spells out the risks that passengers take when riding in the 23,000-pound Titan, including > > eye-popping wording such as how the craft “has not been approved or certified by any regulatory body and may be > > constructed of materials that have not been widely used on human occupied submersible.” > > > > https://nypost.com/2023/06/23/read-the-death-waiver-doomed-titanic-sub-tourists-signed/ > > > > no refunds. > > > > Did Captain Kirk ever ride in dat thing? > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > Okay, I'll tell you what happened... > > > > > > the > > > guys > > > at > > > the > > > top > > > knew > > > that > > > somehow > > > they > > > had > > > broken stuff, > > > the > > > guys > > > at > > > the > > > top > > > didn't > > > want > > > to > > > hear > > > that > > > they > > > had > > > broken stuff. > > > > > > They > > > didn't > > > want > > > to > > > hear > > > about > > > the > > > difficulties > > > of > > > the > > > engineers > > > - > > > the > > > fact > > > that > > > the > > > sub > > > might > > > not > > > work, > > > and > > > so > > > on. > > > > > > It's > > > better > > > if > > > they > > > don't > > > hear > > > it, > > > so > > > they > > > can > > > be > > > much > > > more > > > "honest" > > > when > > > they're > > > trying > > > to > > > sell > > > tickets. > > > - > > > > > > the > > > engineers > > > and > > > scien- > > > tists > > > on > > > the > > > one > > > hand and > > > management > > > on > > > the > > > other > > > - > > > is > > > the > > > cause > > > of > > > the > > > deterioration > > > in > > > cooperation, > > > which, > > > as > > > you've > > > seen, > > > produced > > > a calamity. > > > > > > "...the company refused to pay for the Titan’s manufacturer to build a viewport that would meet the required standards for these depths." > > > "...paying passengers would not be aware or informed of the Titan’s “experimental viewport design,.." > > > https://fortune.com/2023/06/21/titan-titanic-missing-sub-david-lochridge-safety-concerns-sacked-oceangate-stockton-rush-hamish-harding/ > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > https://fortune.com/2023/06/21/titan-titanic-missing-sub-david-lochridge-safety-concerns-sacked-oceangate-stockton-rush-hamish-harding/ > > > > During the meeting, Lochridge said he discovered that the Titan’s > > > > viewport was certified to a pressure of 1,300 meters below sea level. > > > > OceanGate intended to take passengers on the Titan down to depths of > > > > 4,000 meters. > > > > > > > > According to OceanGate’s website, the Titan reaches a maximum depth of > > > > 3,800 meters (12,500 feet) on its Titanic dives. > > > > > > > > However, Lochridge alleged that the company refused to pay for the > > > > Titan’s manufacturer to build a viewport that would meet the required > > > > standards for these depths. > > > > > > > > He also said in the lawsuit that paying passengers would not be aware or > > > > informed of the Titan’s “experimental viewport design,” the lack of > > > > sufficient safety testing of the hull, or that hazardous flammable > > > > materials had been used in its construction. He said he strongly urged > > > > the company to use a classification agency like the American Bureau of > > > > Shipping to inspect and certify the Titan. > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ...maybe they banged a little too hard? > > > > > > > > > > broke the window to swim...up? > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > So, now 'they' say the passengers didn't know what happen when it > > > > > > imploded... > > > > > > > > > > > > then...what was all that BANGING they heard before? > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It doesn't have a toilet? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It uses a old Amazon cheap $30.00 video game controller? (free shipping) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why would you trust Nasa to build dat thing??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > an Xbox contoller makes it go left? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no fat people allowed in dat thing, right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't lean on the window... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want the names and pictures of those NASA guys who worked on dat > > > > > > > thing... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i wanna see what stupid people look like. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trust the Science. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > > > > and challenge > > > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > > > and challenge > > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > > and challenge > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > and challenge > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > -- > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 13:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <649600EB.1B3C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2670494 |
season 1 episode 2 on netflix Passenger 1: (Gasping) No! The controller! I dropped it! Passenger 2: (Agitated) Are you kidding me? That was our only way to navigate the sub! Passenger 3: (Frantically) How could you be so careless? We're trapped down here! Passenger 4: (Angry) This is all your fault! We trusted you with the controller! Passenger 1: (Apologizing) I didn't mean to. It was an accident. We need to stay calm and figure out another solution. Passenger 2: (Panicking) Stay calm? How can we stay calm when we're stuck without any means of controlling the sub? Passenger 3: (Hysterical) We're going to die down here! We're helpless! Passenger 4: (In a frenzy) I can't believe this! We're doomed because of your mistake! Passenger 1: (Trying to calm everyone down) We need to focus and find an alternative. There must be something else we can use or another way to navigate. Passenger 2: (Desperate) We don't have time for alternatives! We're running out of oxygen, and now we can't even move! Passenger 3: (Overwhelmed) I can't take this anymore! I want out of here! Passenger 4: (Aggressive) If we're going down, I'm taking you down with me! Passenger 1: (Wide-eyed, voice trembling) The sub... it's sinking... and the pressure is increasing rapidly! Passenger 2: (Panic-stricken) We're going deeper! We can't withstand this pressure! Passenger 3: (Gasping for air) I can't breathe... the pressure... it's crushing us! Passenger 4: (Terrified, voice shaking) We're going to implode! We're all going to die! Passenger 1: (Frantically) Hold on, we have to do something! We can't let this happen! Passenger 2: (Desperate) There's nothing we can do! We're trapped, helpless! Passenger 3: (Hysterical) We're at the mercy of the ocean... and it's going to consume us! Passenger 4: (Screaming) I don't want to die like this! It's too much! Passenger 1: (Clinging onto hope) We can't give up! We have to keep fighting until the very end! Passenger 2: (Crying) I don't want to die... I don't want to die! Passenger 3: (Choked voice) I'm sorry... I'm so sorry... Passenger 4: (Praying) Please, anyone... save us... save us from this nightmare! As the sub continues its descent into the depths of the ocean, the increasing pressure becomes overwhelming. The passengers are gripped by sheer terror and helplessness, aware of their impending doom. The dialogue reflects their desperation, fear, and the sense of impending tragedy. It showcases their emotional breakdown as they confront the inevitable implosion, clinging onto the last shreds of hope, and grappling with the harsh reality of their fate. The Starmaker wrote: > > Now, whose idea was it to use an x-box toy controller to navigate the > sub? It had to be > > NASA...it couldn't be anybody else. > > Only NASA thinks of things like that! > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > i say wat happen is da guy with the x-box controller dropped it and it > > broke. > > > > and he forgot to buy another one... > > > > and they killed him. > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > If you want an easy million dollars... > > > > > > he charged you $250,000.00 a ticket > > > > > > and he sold 4 tickets > > > > > > dats a million dollars! > > > > > > You are suppose to hide > > > the old X-box controller.. > > > > > > and the fact the sub doesn't work. > > > > > > (just sign here -don't read the small print) > > > > > > The five passengers who boarded the doomed OceanGate Titan submersible that imploded on its way to the wreck > > > of the Titanic signed an iron-clad agreement that protects the company from any liability for what could happen > > > to the vessel, including death. > > > > > > The three-page document spells out the risks that passengers take when riding in the 23,000-pound Titan, including > > > eye-popping wording such as how the craft “has not been approved or certified by any regulatory body and may be > > > constructed of materials that have not been widely used on human occupied submersible.” > > > > > > https://nypost.com/2023/06/23/read-the-death-waiver-doomed-titanic-sub-tourists-signed/ > > > > > > no refunds. > > > > > > Did Captain Kirk ever ride in dat thing? > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > Okay, I'll tell you what happened... > > > > > > > > the > > > > guys > > > > at > > > > the > > > > top > > > > knew > > > > that > > > > somehow > > > > they > > > > had > > > > broken stuff, > > > > the > > > > guys > > > > at > > > > the > > > > top > > > > didn't > > > > want > > > > to > > > > hear > > > > that > > > > they > > > > had > > > > broken stuff. > > > > > > > > They > > > > didn't > > > > want > > > > to > > > > hear > > > > about > > > > the > > > > difficulties > > > > of > > > > the > > > > engineers > > > > - > > > > the > > > > fact > > > > that > > > > the > > > > sub > > > > might > > > > not > > > > work, > > > > and > > > > so > > > > on. > > > > > > > > It's > > > > better > > > > if > > > > they > > > > don't > > > > hear > > > > it, > > > > so > > > > they > > > > can > > > > be > > > > much > > > > more > > > > "honest" > > > > when > > > > they're > > > > trying > > > > to > > > > sell > > > > tickets. > > > > - > > > > > > > > the > > > > engineers > > > > and > > > > scien- > > > > tists > > > > on > > > > the > > > > one > > > > hand and > > > > management > > > > on > > > > the > > > > other > > > > - > > > > is > > > > the > > > > cause > > > > of > > > > the > > > > deterioration > > > > in > > > > cooperation, > > > > which, > > > > as > > > > you've > > > > seen, > > > > produced > > > > a calamity. > > > > > > > > "...the company refused to pay for the Titan’s manufacturer to build a viewport that would meet the required standards for these depths." > > > > "...paying passengers would not be aware or informed of the Titan’s “experimental viewport design,.." > > > > https://fortune.com/2023/06/21/titan-titanic-missing-sub-david-lochridge-safety-concerns-sacked-oceangate-stockton-rush-hamish-harding/ > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > https://fortune.com/2023/06/21/titan-titanic-missing-sub-david-lochridge-safety-concerns-sacked-oceangate-stockton-rush-hamish-harding/ > > > > > During the meeting, Lochridge said he discovered that the Titan’s > > > > > viewport was certified to a pressure of 1,300 meters below sea level. > > > > > OceanGate intended to take passengers on the Titan down to depths of > > > > > 4,000 meters. > > > > > > > > > > According to OceanGate’s website, the Titan reaches a maximum depth of > > > > > 3,800 meters (12,500 feet) on its Titanic dives. > > > > > > > > > > However, Lochridge alleged that the company refused to pay for the > > > > > Titan’s manufacturer to build a viewport that would meet the required > > > > > standards for these depths. > > > > > > > > > > He also said in the lawsuit that paying passengers would not be aware or > > > > > informed of the Titan’s “experimental viewport design,” the lack of > > > > > sufficient safety testing of the hull, or that hazardous flammable > > > > > materials had been used in its construction. He said he strongly urged > > > > > the company to use a classification agency like the American Bureau of > > > > > Shipping to inspect and certify the Titan. > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > ...maybe they banged a little too hard? > > > > > > > > > > > > broke the window to swim...up? > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, now 'they' say the passengers didn't know what happen when it > > > > > > > imploded... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then...what was all that BANGING they heard before? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It doesn't have a toilet? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It uses a old Amazon cheap $30.00 video game controller? (free shipping) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why would you trust Nasa to build dat thing??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > an Xbox contoller makes it go left? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no fat people allowed in dat thing, right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't lean on the window... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want the names and pictures of those NASA guys who worked on dat > > > > > > > > thing... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i wanna see what stupid people look like. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trust the Science. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > > > > > and challenge > > > > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > > > > and challenge > > > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > > > and challenge > > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > > and challenge > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > -- > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 13:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <u74vrv$3qp7b$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2670521 |
On 6/23/2023 1:30 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > season 1 episode 2 on netflix > > Passenger 1: (Gasping) No! The controller! I dropped it! [...] Always, have a backup system. I accidentally dropped and broke just one of many controllers... Does not sound so bad now... They went through hell...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 14:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <649608E7.6B27@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2670523 |
Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > > On 6/23/2023 1:30 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > season 1 episode 2 on netflix > > > > Passenger 1: (Gasping) No! The controller! I dropped it! > [...] > > Always, have a backup system. I accidentally dropped and broke just one > of many controllers... Does not sound so bad now... They went through > hell... There was no backup controlling device on dat sub. If you break your wireless gamepad...your mommy has to buy you a new one. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 14:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <64960BA5.1922@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2670528 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > > > > On 6/23/2023 1:30 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > season 1 episode 2 on netflix > > > > > > Passenger 1: (Gasping) No! The controller! I dropped it! > > [...] > > > > Always, have a backup system. I accidentally dropped and broke just one > > of many controllers... Does not sound so bad now... They went through > > hell... > > There was no backup controlling device on dat sub. > > If you break your wireless gamepad...your mommy has to buy you a new > one. and the guy bought the *cheapest* Logitech wireless gamepad they had. you know.. you go on Amazon and look for the cheapest one you can find. Some people are just...cheap. nuthin wrong wit dat. why buy the most expensive one when you can buy the cheapest one they have? they both work the same, don't they???? (but you gotta by good batteries!) Everready or Duracell? BUT WHO WAS DOING ALL THAT BANGING DOWN THERE???? Like a Twilight Zone show... ding dang ding dang ding dang -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 14:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <64961132.1D95@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2670528 |
A backup controlling device is the buttons on the back of your TV you can still change channels with if your remote breaks or runs out of batteries. There was no backup controlling device on dat sub. Their whole lives depended on the gamepad. What did that astronut say when she dropped her wrench in space? "Great!" dat was no movie, dat was real! The Starmaker wrote: > > Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > > > > On 6/23/2023 1:30 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > season 1 episode 2 on netflix > > > > > > Passenger 1: (Gasping) No! The controller! I dropped it! > > [...] > > > > Always, have a backup system. I accidentally dropped and broke just one > > of many controllers... Does not sound so bad now... They went through > > hell... > > There was no backup controlling device on dat sub. > > If you break your wireless gamepad...your mommy has to buy you a new > one. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 14:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <u7547h$3r4a5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2670537 |
On 6/23/2023 2:40 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > A backup controlling device is the buttons on the back of your TV > you can still change channels with if your remote breaks or runs out of > batteries. [...] Okay, that made me laugh. But, I have respect for the lives that were lost on that sub. Damn.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 16:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <649623FF.1E39@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2670539 |
Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > > On 6/23/2023 2:40 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > A backup controlling device is the buttons on the back of your TV > > you can still change channels with if your remote breaks or runs out of > > batteries. > [...] > > Okay, that made me laugh. But, I have respect for the lives that were > lost on that sub. Damn. Of course, you respect the life of the CEO Stockton Rush CEO: https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/12A15/production/_130190367_email_exchange_v3_640-nc-2x-nc.png -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-02 15:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <64A1F9CC.3EA1@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2670561 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 2:19:35 AM UTC-4, George Hammond wrote: > > On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 12:04:24 AM UTC-4, Physfitfreak wrote: > > > On 6/23/2023 6:00 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > > > >> > > > >> On 6/23/2023 2:40 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>> A backup controlling device is the buttons on the back of your TV > > > >>> you can still change channels with if your remote breaks or runs out of > > > >>> batteries. > > > >> [...] > > > >> > > > >> Okay, that made me laugh. But, I have respect for the lives that were > > > >> lost on that sub. Damn. > > > > > > > > Of course, you respect the life of the CEO Stockton Rush CEO: > > > > > > > > https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/12A15/production/_130190367_email_exchange_v3_640-nc-2x-nc.png > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hahahahh :-) > > > > > > As I said, the guy was a "whodat". > > > > > > "Nothing matters except the bullshit that I propound. Degrees? > > > Standards? Actual knowledge? The right profession? The right > > > professionals? No, none of that! Only the bullshit that I happen to be > > > saying is what matters!" > > > > > > - Stockton "The Whodat" Rush > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > > > www.avast.com > > . > > //George E Hammond MS Physics// > > June 24, 2023 > > . > > Incidentally the ROV that located the Titan > > was manufactured by a company only 20 miles > > from me on Cape Cod. In the town of Wellfleet. > > . > > Here's the Deadly Math concerning the accident. > > Ambient air pressure at the surface is 15 psi. > > Seawater pressure increases 0.444 psi/ft and > > since 2 miles is 10,560 feet the pressure at > > the Titanic is (.444)(10560)=4689 psi > > > > That compression ratio is 4689/15=313 > > . > > The volume of the Titan chamber was about > > (pi)(5^2) (10)= 785 ft.³ > > . > > Which means that once it imploded the air volume > > was near instantly reduced to: – > > 785/313=2.5 ft.³ > > . > > The air bubble that rose from the Titan was > > initially: – > > (4/3)(pi)(r^3)=2.5 hence r=0.842 ft=10 inches > > . > > The air bubble rising from the Titan > > was only the size of a party balloon. > > . > > GEO > . > */George Hammond MS Physics/* > July 1, 2023 > . > Videos of the recovered Titan fragments > show 2 major points: – > . > 1 – The Plexiglas viewing window is missing > . > 2 – the undercarriage is completely undamaged > . > Point 2 indicates that the undercarriage was > RELEASED prior to the implosion ! > This indicates that the Titan had reversed > direction and was on the way up again – > presumably from some major emergency ! > . > Point 1 – the Plexiglas window missing may > have occurred either before or after the > implosion – no way to tell at this point? > . > The fact that the UNDERCARRIAGE was not > bent, distorted or damaged in any way indicates > that it was RELEASED ON PURPOSE which > indicates a "return to the surface" emergency > maneuver – if so, the occupants may have had > several minutes of pre-implosion drama > (crackling, popping noises etc.) before the > final implosion ! ... Gad !! > . > GEO __ MS Physics Official 1: (Stunned) Look at these videos! The viewing window is missing! Official 2: (Examining the footage) You're right! The window is gone. But the undercarriage is undamaged. Official 3: (Thoughtfully) That means the undercarriage was released before the implosion. Official 4: (Nervously) Why would they release it? What could have been the emergency? Official 1: (Hypothesizing) Perhaps they encountered a problem and were trying to resurface quickly. Official 2: (Anxious) That might explain the banging noises we heard earlier. They were trying to get help! Official 3: (Speculating) But if the undercarriage was released intentionally, they must have been in serious trouble. Official 4: (Uneasy) What kind of trouble could cause them to make such a drastic move? Official 1: (Looking worried) It's hard to say. Maybe they were running out of oxygen or had a critical system failure. Official 2: (Gulping) Whatever happened, it must have been terrifying for them. Official 3: (Trying to remain calm) It's possible they were struggling to fix the issue before it was too late. Official 4: (Panicking) But it looks like they didn't have enough time. The implosion must have been devastating! Official 1: (In shock) Imagine the final moments—crackling, popping noises... The fear they must have felt. Official 2: (Distressed) It's heartbreaking to think about. They were so close to making it back. Official 3: (Swallowing hard) We have to hope that they didn't suffer for long. Official 4: (Grieving) Rest in peace, my friends. We can't change what happened, but we must stay strong. The new details from the recovered Titan fragments have left the Officials with more questions than answers. They try to piece together the events that led to the sub's implosion, pondering the emergency that forced the undercarriage release. The dialogue reflects their shock and sorrow as they contemplate the dramatic turn of events that may have unfolded inside the sub before its final moments. I heard somebody was offered a ticket at half the price! Bring your kids!! -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
csiph-web