Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.evolution > #612

Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin?

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 16:30:30 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net>
wrote:

>On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 14:54:48 -0500, "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden
>Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>"Andrew" <andrew.86remov@usa.net> wrote in
>>news:MN2dnSrVw-FU95_FnZ2dnUU7-cvNnZ2d@earthlink.com: 
>>
>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
>>> news:XnsA6A27B185400Bnoemailattnet@216.166.97.131... 
><snip>     
>>        
>>       "Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so
>> simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is
>> false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false.
>> What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious
>> commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than
>> a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by
>> granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but
>> calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an
>> enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould. 
>> 
>I'm not trying to prove anything or stir up a debate but I would like
>to understand how atheists and agnostics manage to accept the idea
>that the multiverse just popped into existence with no form of
>intelligence involved. 

You already know that this is nothing to do with atheism or
agnosticism - and that this is a dishonest caricature of one of the
proposed scenarios which break no known laws of physics.

What's wrong with you?

>And, while on this topic, how do these people regard the idea that
>this cosmic intelligence might exist as in a structure such as quantum

THERE IS NO EVIDENCE FOR IT, IMBECILE - AND NO REASON EVEN TO SUGGEST
IT APART FROM RELIGIOUS BRAINWASHING.

But then you already know  this.

>entangled sub-atomic particles that function somewhat like the
>synapses of our brain? Such an array of quantum entangled particles
>could communicate across the entire multiverse, instantly, and could
>have a very precise control of all that is going on, or ever has
>happened.   

Idiot.

>Gordon

Back to alt.evolution | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-15 14:54 -0500
  Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2016-10-15 16:30 -0500
    Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-15 18:55 -0500
      Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-10-15 19:21 -0500
    Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-10-15 19:20 -0500
    Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-10-16 01:07 -0700
    Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-10-16 17:41 +0000
      Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-10-16 12:51 -0500

csiph-web