Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #266747 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-08 11:30 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-13 05:41 +0000 |
| Articles | 19 on this page of 199 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.conspiracy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 11:30 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 12:44 -0400
Re: Rocky has no clue about airplanes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 18:26 +0000
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 20:08 +0100
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 19:46 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:11 -0500
Re: Rocky is shooken jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 21:19 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 17:29 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-09 00:00 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 02:13 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-09 02:03 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 10:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-09 17:22 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 18:16 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:16 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-10 03:54 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-10 07:05 +0200
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:43 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 23:36 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit 3 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 10:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit 3 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-09 17:23 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-10 18:06 +1000
Re: Plane truth HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 07:39 -0400
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-10 20:58 +0100
Re: Plane truth george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> - 2015-09-11 08:14 +1200
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-10 16:57 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-10 23:03 +0100
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 19:51 +0100
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 15:45 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 16:20 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 16:54 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 17:21 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:53 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 23:09 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 09:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 16:15 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 13:35 -0400
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 18:31 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:28 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-10 04:21 +0000
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:41 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-10 08:59 -0400
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-10 13:52 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 12:31 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-19 18:37 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:03 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:10 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-20 05:21 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 10:56 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-20 19:52 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:22 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:29 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-21 01:42 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 22:11 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-21 05:06 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 06:14 -0500
Re: Plane truth dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-21 11:58 -0700
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 14:06 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-21 20:19 +0100
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 15:38 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:21 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-21 20:19 +0100
Re: Plane truth (Wow Michael found an interesting link ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:51 -0500
Re: Plane truth (Wow Michael found an interesting link ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:30 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 16:56 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:30 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 21:05 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( WTC Core Columns Turn To Dust? ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:40 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 09:52 +0100
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:10 -0500
Re: Plane truth BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-10 10:26 -0400
Re: Plane truth 9/11 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-11 09:34 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 19:34 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:54 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 12:09 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:41 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-13 07:29 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:05 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Kid is caught lying again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:32 -0500
Re: Plane truth (More proof, if any were needed, that Roger is mentally ill) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:47 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 15:55 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 17:03 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 17:36 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:56 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 12:29 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 09:05 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 12:32 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 15:09 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 18:53 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 13:09 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 17:57 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 17:57 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-12 16:45 -0700
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 19:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 20:35 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 07:55 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 11:14 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:48 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) ( Kid can not quote NIST ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:33 -0500
Re: Rocky's ignorance jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 19:52 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) ( Kid can not quote NIST ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:21 -0500
Re: Rocky babbles on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:32 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:26 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 09:35 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 18:22 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-15 02:17 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael stilll thinks he is super smart but he is a nobody ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 21:31 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-13 02:37 -0700
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:11 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:47 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-12 23:16 -0400
Re: Ignorance of aircraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:30 +0000
Re: Ignorance of aircraft BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-13 10:10 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:16 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:01 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-13 10:11 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:46 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:10 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Roger is not mentally able to answer questions) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:20 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 01:55 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:25 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 09:14 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-14 06:36 -0700
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:56 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-14 20:44 -0700
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-13 07:31 +0200
Re: delusions about airplanes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:26 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-15 13:52 -0700
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:16 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:20 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:33 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 05:57 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:01 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 15:56 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 15:02 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 21:35 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:35 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:32 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:23 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:31 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:39 -0500
Re: Rocky runs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 22:51 +0000
Re: Rocky runs Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 19:09 -0400
Re: Rocky runs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:48 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-13 16:27 -0700
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 18:54 -0500
Re: Imaginary missiles jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 00:29 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-14 06:35 -0700
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 09:06 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-14 17:07 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 12:25 -0500
Re: Rocky still delusional jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 17:58 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-14 22:05 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 17:40 -0500
Re: Rocky is really stupid jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 23:11 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:45 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-14 20:50 -0700
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 18:09 -0500
Re: Rocky still stupid jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 23:40 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:46 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-15 01:45 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 21:24 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 04:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 04:46 +0200
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-14 20:56 -0700
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 05:49 +0200
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-14 20:41 -0700
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-15 14:07 -0700
Re: Phantom missiles jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:35 +0000
Re: Phantom missiles "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-09-13 10:56 -0700
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:38 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:01 -0400
Re: Plane truth dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-15 13:44 -0700
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:06 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:41 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 20:02 -0400
Re: More Rocky fantasy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 21:13 +0000
Re: More Rocky fantasy Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
Re: More Rocky fantasy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 22:59 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:36 -0500
Re: Plane truth jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:12 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:56 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:03 -0400
Re: Plane delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:39 +0000
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Kid Wills proves he has never flown remote controlled airplanes + napalm ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Kid Wills proves he has never flown remote controlled airplanes + napalm ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:00 -0500
Re: more delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:41 +0000
Page 10 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 20:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mt2gem$57a$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #267081 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:09:28 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >>> Which one of you kooks is claiming it was a missile? > >> Everyone. >> ...Except YOU, of course. > > Missile type and platform then? The only people who can give you that information are the ones who pushed the button ....Ask Dick Cheney. Would you accept a criminal being let off if someone beat you senseless with a baseball bat, then if you couldn't tell the cops what brand of bat, and the store location where it was bought ??? The bat still exists and is VERY REAL, even without those extraneous details.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 23:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <bbp9va9e0896dlfn7matlpuc657d0ev40i@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #267097 |
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 20:38:30 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:09:28 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>>> Which one of you kooks is claiming it was a missile? >> >>> Everyone. >>> ...Except YOU, of course. >> >> Missile type and platform then? > >The only people who can give you that information are the ones who pushed >the button >....Ask Dick Cheney. > You're *CLAIMING* a missile hit the Pentagon on 9/11. It is then incumbant upon *YOU* to provide the details and the evidence. You can't tell me what missile or what platform. Therefore your accusations of involvement by Dick Chaney are proven as lies and dismissed from further debate. This leaves the triuth, that an American Akrlines plane crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11/01. Since you alwayd bailed on my question about where did the passengers go from Flight 77, this resolves then to you are little more than a emotionally immature mentally ill syncophant of Roger parroting back nonsense. You have nothing. No opinion of your own. No proof. All you do is post video links of nothing. >Would you accept a criminal being let off if someone beat you senseless with >a baseball bat, then if you couldn't tell the cops what brand of bat, and >the store location where it was bought ??? I have a CCW. I'm not going to allow anyone to beat me with anything, let alone a baseball bat. >The bat still exists and is VERY REAL, even without those extraneous >details. And the dead criminal lying at my feet?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 13:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <274942f3-4bf1-4e8c-92e3-0343d1bb937f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #267076 |
On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 12:09:36 PM UTC-5, Bast wrote: > Sarah Ehrett wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:09:26 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > > >> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message > >> news:aa06vahah9cj5c4pfvgcjkoe59i3o5f5jq@4ax.com... > >>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:05:51 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>> > >>>> BTW if Sarah's hubby saw Flight 77 > >>> > >>> No "f" Roger. > >>> > >>> I see you agree the location of the Pentagon's helipad on 9/11 was > >>> right next to the entry hole of Flight 77. > >> > >> The only problem is the small white jet that crashed at the heliport > > > > There was no small white jet. > > > > Which one of you kooks is claiming it was a missile? > > > > Everyone. > ...Except YOU, of course. If you limit yourselves to the eye witnesses, almost none say they saw a missile, or a missile like object. The preponderance of statements makes it clear that an airliner hit the Pentagon. https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/911pentagonflight77evidencesummary Dan (Woj...)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-11 18:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lin6va9nlb0engoq7trturrjlb13e907do@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #266980 |
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:05:51 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
[...]
>>>>> What happened to David Angell?
>>>>
>>>> How the hell are we supposed to know ?
>>>
>>> They were on the planes that crashed into the Pentagon and the WTC on
>>> 9/11.
>>>
>>> Where are they if those planes didn't do exactly as we saw on TV
>>> worldwide?
>>>
>>>
>>>> Call them and ask them where they are.
>>>
>>> Alright, you're a waste of time.
>>
>>
>>
>> You didn't ask about Santa.
>>
>> ...He's at the North pole.
>
>Obviously Sarah does not appreciate someone with good humor and brains.
>
So she does appreciate you then?
>BTW if Sarah's hubby saw Flight 77 then he has probably seen Santa too. And
>I'm inclined to think that he saw Santa ram the Pentagon since Sarah will
>not tell anybody what her husband really saw. <G>
She already posted what he really saw. What do you gain from
lying about this?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-08 16:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <HpudnR-A2N4RyHLInZ2dnUU7-N2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #266783 |
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message news:e1juua5l0t7anmb45vsuqmlo8mompsrihp@4ax.com... > On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:55:04 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>news:gleuualfua2nhia16n6soqvntrfmg0v24d@4ax.com... >>> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 11:30:16 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>>ROTFLMAO because you forgot to notice that neither of the bogus jets in >>>>Nuke >>>>York City >>> >>> You've run away from these questions for quite some time, Roger. >>> >>> What happened to the passengers on Flight 175 ? Two of whom were from >>> my >>> son's alma mater. >>> >>> What happened to the passengers on Flight 77 ? You remember Barbara >>> Olson? >>> Did she just say "poof " and disappear? >> >>If you listen to the video I gave you earlier > > I asked a simple question. You've maintained there were no planes. Here, I'll try it again, There were two planes that were real and they both landed in Cleveland using different flight numbers. Flight 11 and Flight 77 didn't even take off on 9/11/01 so any voices from those flights were staged as was most of the great 9/11 hoax. > In your own words, what happened to the passengers? I have no idea what happened to them but changes are they were gassed since out government wanted high causalities as I pointed out in the video I gave you twice so far. > What happened to Barbara Olsen? Why don't you ask Ted's current wife? And you might end up talking to the late Barbara Olsen. > What happened to David Angell? Well, if the 9/11 Commission had done their job instead of letting themselves be hijacked we might have found out. And what are you doing worried about them when you should be worried about all the needless wars we have jumped into for a great big hoax. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-08 20:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <7etuuad0fmk5s1k8rrrc7g4l6rqb22t5hh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #266792 |
On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 16:41:46 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >news:e1juua5l0t7anmb45vsuqmlo8mompsrihp@4ax.com... >> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:55:04 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> >>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>news:gleuualfua2nhia16n6soqvntrfmg0v24d@4ax.com... >>>> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 11:30:16 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>ROTFLMAO because you forgot to notice that neither of the bogus jets in >>>>>Nuke >>>>>York City >>>> >>>> You've run away from these questions for quite some time, Roger. >>>> >>>> What happened to the passengers on Flight 175 ? Two of whom were from >>>> my >>>> son's alma mater. >>>> >>>> What happened to the passengers on Flight 77 ? You remember Barbara >>>> Olson? Did she just say "poof " and disappear? >>> >>>If you listen to the video I gave you earlier >> >> I asked a simple question. You've maintained there were no planes. > >Here, I'll try it again, There were two planes that were real and they both >landed in Cleveland using different flight numbers. Barbara Olsen didn't land in Cleveland. David Angell and his wife didn't land in Cleveland. Barbara Olsen died when Flight 77 slammed into the Pentagon. David Angell and his wife died when Flight 11 hit the WTC. >Flight 11 and Flight 77 didn't even take off on 9/11/01 so any voices from >those flights were staged as was most of the great 9/11 hoax. >> In your own words, what happened to the passengers? > >I have no idea what happened to them You'd better find out if you're going to try and sell this nonsense. >> What happened to Barbara Olsen? > >Why don't you ask Ted's current wife? And you might end up talking to the >late Barbara Olsen. > > >> What happened to David Angell? > >Well, if the 9/11 Commission had done their job instead of letting >themselves be hijacked we might have found out. So you have nothing. Occums Razor.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-08 21:13 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: More Rocky fantasy |
| Message-ID | <skv3cc-t2m.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #266779 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > you will hear people saying they needed a lot of casualties so they used > them as casualties but big jets do not have the precision they needed to > strike the Twin Towers exactly where they wanted the Twin Towers hit so not Yet airliners land exactly on a runway center line day in and day out, kook. <snip remaining lunatic kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: More Rocky fantasy |
| Message-ID | <msnmmi$c1i$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #266785 |
On 08/09/2015 22:13, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> you will hear people saying they needed a lot of casualties so they used >> them as casualties but big jets do not have the precision they needed to >> strike the Twin Towers exactly where they wanted the Twin Towers hit so not > > Yet airliners land exactly on a runway center line day in and day out, kook. > > <snip remaining lunatic kook babble> > > And military planes can refuel in air, a much smaller target. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-08 22:59 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: More Rocky fantasy |
| Message-ID | <pq54cc-3qm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #266796 |
In sci.physics Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote: > On 08/09/2015 22:13, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> you will hear people saying they needed a lot of casualties so they used >>> them as casualties but big jets do not have the precision they needed to >>> strike the Twin Towers exactly where they wanted the Twin Towers hit so not >> >> Yet airliners land exactly on a runway center line day in and day out, kook. >> >> <snip remaining lunatic kook babble> >> >> > > And military planes can refuel in air, a much smaller target. That is really apples and oranges as things like crosswinds are the same for both the tanker and the aircraft to be fueled so pilots have to do very little other than match speeds and gently manuever. Controls are also much more responsive at cruise speed as compared to final approach speed. The hardest part of hitting a building in any particular place would be maintaining control all the way in knowing you are going to die, but I guess that wouldn't apply to someone expecting 70 virgins. This is just another of Rocky's delusional red herrings. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 18:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sP2dnZ72963BKmnInZ2dnUU7-LOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #266773 |
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message news:gleuualfua2nhia16n6soqvntrfmg0v24d@4ax.com... > On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 11:30:16 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>ROTFLMAO because you forgot to notice that neither of the bogus jets in >>Nuke >>York City > > You've run away from these questions for quite some time, Roger. > > What happened to the passengers on Flight 175 ? Two of whom were from my > son's alma mater. > > What happened to the passengers on Flight 77 ? You remember Barbara > Olson? > Did she just say "poof " and disappear? What I'd like to know is how could Barbara Olson fly on a jet that never took off on 9/11? If you had been watching the news close on 9/11/01 you would have noticed that the crap we were told about the Pentagon was inconsistent with a crash of a commercial jet. But the fact the Pentagon was hit by a ship sinking missile explains why the hole was so close to the ground. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 00:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <2lrecc-dug.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #267087 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > But the fact the Pentagon was hit by a ship sinking missile explains why the > hole was so close to the ground. How is that, you delusional fuckwit? If airliners can't get close to the ground, how do they ever land, you delusional fuckwit? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 20:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mt2hh7$7vo$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #267094 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> But the fact the Pentagon was hit by a ship sinking missile explains >> why the hole was so close to the ground. > > How is that, you delusional fuckwit? > > If airliners can't get close to the ground, how do they ever land, > you delusional fuckwit? Well,...do you think airliners landing, come in at full speed ??? NO,....or they end up in pieces all over the landing strip. Do your homework and ask any pilot about "Ground Effect".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 23:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <bpp9va1v2ome3dvhro0n0001k4tqtv8ukt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #267099 |
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 20:56:54 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> But the fact the Pentagon was hit by a ship sinking missile explains >>> why the hole was so close to the ground. >> >> How is that, you delusional fuckwit? >> >> If airliners can't get close to the ground, how do they ever land, >> you delusional fuckwit? > >Well,...do you think airliners landing, come in at full speed ??? Sure. They *can* come in a full speed. >NO,....or they end up in pieces all over the landing strip. LOL Every plane that lands on an airctraft carrier lands at full throttle, you fuckwit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 05:39 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Plane delusions |
| Message-ID | <spefcc-6pi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #267099 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> But the fact the Pentagon was hit by a ship sinking missile explains >>> why the hole was so close to the ground. >> >> How is that, you delusional fuckwit? >> >> If airliners can't get close to the ground, how do they ever land, >> you delusional fuckwit? > > > > > > Well,...do you think airliners landing, come in at full speed ??? > NO,....or they end up in pieces all over the landing strip. > > Do your homework and ask any pilot about "Ground Effect". I am a pilot fuckwit, and ground effect has no effect on controllability, you babbling kook. There is no reason one could not land an airplane at full speed on final approach other than the airplane would have to be very, very long. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <gdj9valgo90a5rg0rr6k6csjm1bnpa6nid@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #267094 |
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 00:12:50 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> But the fact the Pentagon was hit by a ship sinking missile explains why the
>> hole was so close to the ground.
>
>How is that, you delusional fuckwit?
>
>If airliners can't get close to the ground, how do they ever land,
>you delusional fuckwit?
You need to realize that in Roger's mind, the laws of physics
were suspended for a short time on 9/11/01.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lcj9vah80dtl61usrtfjchs7cd0frifafq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #267087 |
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 18:36:59 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:gleuualfua2nhia16n6soqvntrfmg0v24d@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 11:30:16 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>ROTFLMAO because you forgot to notice that neither of the bogus jets in
>>>Nuke
>>>York City
>>
>> You've run away from these questions for quite some time, Roger.
>>
>> What happened to the passengers on Flight 175 ? Two of whom were from my
>> son's alma mater.
>>
>> What happened to the passengers on Flight 77 ? You remember Barbara
>> Olson?
>> Did she just say "poof " and disappear?
>
>What I'd like to know is how could Barbara Olson fly on a jet that never
>took off on 9/11?
>
She couldn't. This is how we know your claim that it didn't is
nothing more than additional evidence of your mental health issue(s).
>If you had been watching the news close on 9/11/01 you would have noticed
>that the crap we were told about the Pentagon was inconsistent with a crash
>of a commercial jet.
>
And you base this claim on what evidence and/or expert opinion?
>But the fact the Pentagon was hit by a ship sinking missile explains why the
>hole was so close to the ground.
Or, as was the case, the plane was close to the ground.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 21:13 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( Kid Wills proves he has never flown remote controlled airplanes + napalm ) |
| Message-ID | <nfOdne5O2JRvRmnInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #267104 |
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:lcj9vah80dtl61usrtfjchs7cd0frifafq@4ax.com... > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 18:36:59 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > >>But the fact the Pentagon was hit by a ship sinking missile explains why >>the >>hole was so close to the ground. > > Or, as was the case, the plane was close to the ground. You have obviously never flown remote controlled airplanes because you can notice ground effect with those too. Not only will ground effect help keep airplanes from flying at top speed right next to the ground but they also help slow moving airplanes maneuver very close to the ground. And weren't you supposed to look up napalm and see that the explosions in the Twin Towers were consistent with a napalm explosion? Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 08:00 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( Kid Wills proves he has never flown remote controlled airplanes + napalm ) |
| Message-ID | <hqsava1p3g13as1v1kdonsok9re7e699s9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #267115 |
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:13:25 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:lcj9vah80dtl61usrtfjchs7cd0frifafq@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 18:36:59 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>But the fact the Pentagon was hit by a ship sinking missile explains why
>>>the
>>>hole was so close to the ground.
>>
>> Or, as was the case, the plane was close to the ground.
>
>You have obviously never flown remote controlled airplanes because you can
>notice ground effect with those too.
>
I await your valid, verifiable evidence that I've not flown RC
planes.
>Not only will ground effect help keep airplanes from flying at top speed
>right next to the ground but they also help slow moving airplanes maneuver
>very close to the ground.
I await your valid, verifiable evidence for this claim.
>
>And weren't you supposed to look up napalm and see that the explosions in
>the Twin Towers were consistent with a napalm explosion?
>
No. You were supposed to present your evidence that napalm was
used in the twin towers. As of the time I write this, you've offered
none.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 05:41 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: more delusions |
| Message-ID | <dtefcc-6pi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #267115 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > And weren't you supposed to look up napalm and see that the explosions in > the Twin Towers were consistent with a napalm explosion? Napalm doesn't explode, fuckwit kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10]
Back to top | Article view | alt.conspiracy
csiph-web