Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #262751 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-08 19:36 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-09 15:44 -0500 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 53 participants
Thread has 1017 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to alt.conspiracy | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1017 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 19:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 00:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 20:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 01:27 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 20:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 03:16 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 06:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:14 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 13:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 14:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 20:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:11 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 20:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 01:51 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 02:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 23:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 01:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 06:37 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 13:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 13:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 05:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 10:19 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 10:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 13:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 18:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 14:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 20:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 15:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 21:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 16:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 21:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 16:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-15 16:11 -0600
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (laughing at Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (laughing at Jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 00:57 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 16:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-09 22:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Mattb. <trdell1234@outlook.com> - 2015-08-09 22:35 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 02:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 08:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em 2-Methyl-2-Chlorobutyl-Methylphenol-CinnamylN1-Methylbutyrate <distracted.blonde.ammunition-whore@alt.comedy.thin-lingerie-lass> - 2015-08-10 09:39 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "grizzled laggard" <degenerate.haddock.pasty@unsatisfactory.kookooyumyumpoon> - 2015-08-13 01:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 04:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "broken down loafer" <indelicate.meat.napkin@tender.biff> - 2015-08-13 10:07 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:44 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:01 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 07:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 07:34 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 18:16 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:35 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 17:54 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:04 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 10:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:34 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:09 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 11:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:00 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:00 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:33 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 11:02 -0500
Re: Nuke Em dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-12 10:35 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 14:20 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 14:44 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 17:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 15:52 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-12 20:44 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 07:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 07:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 15:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:14 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:24 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 15:57 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:09 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 07:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 08:47 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:17 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 16:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 00:59 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-13 22:49 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 17:06 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 17:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 17:18 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-13 22:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 16:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 17:09 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-14 11:21 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 11:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 10:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 07:44 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 11:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 09:32 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:21 +0000
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:20 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 06:27 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 07:08 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 12:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 07:21 -0400
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 22:43 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:50 -0500
Re: Nuke Em BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-16 11:53 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:24 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 16:59 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 06:50 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 10:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:24 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:09 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:26 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 07:12 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 10:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:24 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 20:48 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 17:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-15 16:04 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 23:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 01:01 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 23:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 01:04 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:21 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Khepernefru II" <gimpy.cock.squeezer@rattle.boned.hoo-hoo> - 2015-08-17 00:04 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:31 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:24 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:24 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 03:35 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:45 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 06:54 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 07:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 11:47 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 19:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 18:23 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 19:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 03:34 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-15 22:08 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 05:14 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Halstead Lippergold-onnerhall" <holy@mackerel.orgy> - 2015-08-16 13:54 +0800
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 07:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:14 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 17:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 19:36 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:51 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 06:53 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Surviving the Halstead shit storm) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:32 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Surviving the Halstead shit storm) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:52 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 06:00 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 06:51 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 12:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:45 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 15:28 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 15:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 15:19 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 19:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 17:18 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah now %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah now %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 18:22 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 00:19 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Jim's meltdown) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 21:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Jim's meltdown) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 04:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 20:53 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:31 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-17 16:12 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-17 12:06 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 19:04 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:22 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-08-17 18:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:27 +0200
Question for FNV "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:37 -0500
Re: Question for FNV "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:42 -0500
Re: Question for FNV Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 20:00 -0400
Re: Question for FNV "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:16 -0500
Re: Question for FNV Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 06:32 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:14 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:49 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:27 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:59 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 22:30 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 18:32 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 22:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:54 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 23:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 03:42 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 06:50 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:16 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:33 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Dr. Morpheus" <d.morpheus@debunkers.ie> - 2015-08-17 23:42 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Dr. Morpheus" <d.morpheus@debunkers.ie> - 2015-08-18 02:50 +0200
Dook Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-18 03:43 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 10:26 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-18 16:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Dr. Morpheus" <d.morpheus@debunkers.ie> - 2015-08-18 19:52 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 02:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 06:57 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 11:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 17:01 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-17 10:20 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:27 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 18:06 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 13:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 19:38 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:11 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:36 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-17 14:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 18:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:39 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-18 09:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-18 09:34 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 21:17 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:19 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:40 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 23:19 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 20:03 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 22:51 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needs help ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needs help ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 02:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needs help ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 07:04 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needsa lot of help ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needsa lot of help ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 05:13 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 10:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:19 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:44 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 08:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 20:49 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 19:50 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 06:59 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 06:02 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 19:23 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 19:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 23:12 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 21:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 02:59 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:10 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <anon@anon.anon> - 2015-08-17 17:34 +0800
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:02 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@rec.games.video.crossdressing> - 2015-08-18 20:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:56 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 07:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:00 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:22 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:46 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:20 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:12 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:39 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:12 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:55 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:13 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:10 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 07:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 08:59 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:25 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:48 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 15:22 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 15:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:04 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:46 +0000
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-20 16:09 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Joe Cooper <dragon40@removeunseen.is> - 2015-08-20 22:26 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-20 22:36 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 21:29 +0000
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-22 04:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 16:19 +0000
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 16:21 +0000
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:52 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 07:00 -0400
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:53 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) doug.bollen@rocketmail.com - 2015-08-23 03:56 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 09:03 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) doug.bollen@rocketmail.com - 2015-08-23 03:57 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 09:04 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-22 04:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-22 14:36 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 09:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-22 17:19 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:51 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:57 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) doug.bollen@rocketmail.com - 2015-08-23 03:55 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 09:05 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:56 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:54 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) doug.bollen@rocketmail.com - 2015-08-23 03:56 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 09:06 -0500
Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:15 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:23 +0000
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:00 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 15:58 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 16:33 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 17:07 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 23:48 +0100
Re: Topaz terrorist je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-24 16:11 -0700
Re: Topaz terrorist BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:17 -0400
Re: Topaz terrorist BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:39 -0400
Re: Topaz terrorist Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 05:36 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 10:21 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:02 +0000
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's & Jim's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:48 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's & Jim's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:15 +0000
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:05 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 09:05 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 18:27 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:50 +0000
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:38 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-29 03:44 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-29 04:43 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:08 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 17:18 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:53 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 14:37 -0700
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:39 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 15:54 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:45 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:17 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 06:40 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:15 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:46 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 15:56 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:05 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-30 03:19 -0700
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:46 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:12 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:34 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:50 -0700
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 01:57 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:44 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:17 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 16:51 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:36 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:46 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:25 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:17 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-03 16:29 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 16:57 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 15:48 -0700
Re: Rocky still jobless and crazy as a loon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 22:42 +0000
Re: Re: Rocky still jobless and crazy as a loon Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:23 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:42 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:59 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-04 09:43 -0700
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:22 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-04 08:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:26 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:19 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 06:03 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 03:58 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:28 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Thanks Topaz) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:54 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:14 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 12:40 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:42 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:44 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:37 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:32 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 05:05 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:38 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-02 06:37 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:27 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-02 18:50 -0400
Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-03 06:00 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-03 16:36 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-04 08:00 +0200
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:29 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:19 +0200
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 06:05 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 19:53 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 21:53 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:53 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:20 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:47 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:38 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:54 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:43 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 16:56 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:26 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 17:28 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:39 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 09:52 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 13:07 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 15:56 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 16:53 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:56 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:52 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 16:57 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 17:33 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-26 04:01 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 13:14 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 20:18 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-19 19:36 -0400
Re: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-20 16:11 -0500
No Holograms (was: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:42 -0500
Re: No Holograms (was: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 09:30 -0500
Re: No Holograms jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:51 +0000
Re: Re: No Holograms Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:07 -0500
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 09:07 -0400
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:37 +0000
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 13:37 -0400
Re: Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 17:07 -0500
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:23 +0200
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 08:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-19 15:48 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 11:02 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 19:22 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 20:39 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-19 19:43 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@alt.support.just.venting> - 2015-08-21 10:48 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 08:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 19:10 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:55 -0500
2 Rick (was: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:31 -0500
Re: 2 Rick (was: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:22 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-18 09:45 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:37 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:02 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-26 13:18 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 15:17 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 12:00 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 20:36 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 17:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 00:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 01:16 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 08:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-28 12:56 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 14:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 18:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 23:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 09:33 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:43 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 19:31 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 05:40 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 01:29 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 17:17 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 22:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 20:13 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 22:43 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:52 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 18:59 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 19:47 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:12 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 06:52 +0200
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:45 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 05:37 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 23:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 21:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:48 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 07:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:19 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:48 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:59 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 19:02 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 12:22 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:28 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 22:03 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 19:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 01:04 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 07:09 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:17 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:17 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 23:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 11:21 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:06 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 18:29 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 18:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 06:59 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 16:38 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 18:40 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 09:00 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:09 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:47 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 16:35 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 00:01 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 21:05 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 22:11 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 21:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:11 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 22:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah + s ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah + s ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:27 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah + s ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:46 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:44 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:45 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-08-17 18:42 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:05 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 03:00 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 06:36 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@rec.arts.books.chronic.constipation> - 2015-08-18 11:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:01 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (temper) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 11:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (temper) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:30 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (temper) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (temper) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:51 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:30 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 11:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:57 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 07:36 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 15:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 14:05 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 19:36 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 17:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-15 16:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:29 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:46 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:12 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:47 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 12:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:30 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:46 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:40 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:26 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:24 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 08:24 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 17:14 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:43 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:36 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:24 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:50 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:22 +0100
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:39 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 23:03 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 06:17 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 23:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:42 +0200
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:40 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 17:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 17:27 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 17:52 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 18:05 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:46 -0500
NOMINATION: Kook of the Month Re: Nuke Em "Pacesetter" <pace@setter.boss> - 2015-08-13 10:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 08:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 10:27 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 12:53 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 13:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 06:06 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 19:12 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:21 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:29 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 00:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 23:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 00:44 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 22:53 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 04:53 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@rec.humour.funny.why.breathing.is.good.for.you> - 2015-08-16 03:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 06:40 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Quukur the inventive lizard-quaverer" <bat-fowling.credulous.fool@flapping.bacilliform.hasty.flirt-gill> - 2015-08-15 13:00 +0800
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 18:47 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Netjershema IV" <scorched.beaver@ripe.mommy.button> - 2015-08-16 23:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:16 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@soc.religion.prostatitis.worried.dude> - 2015-08-17 03:02 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:42 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 18:18 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Sekhemamun II Ankhet" <enfeebled.shutters.of.love@bulging.hairy.cherry> - 2015-08-16 23:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:16 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 19:40 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 06:03 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 10:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 17:01 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-17 05:46 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 22:32 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 20:01 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:24 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:29 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-08-14 17:01 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:29 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-15 09:21 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-15 18:43 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:18 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 07:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 17:06 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-16 12:08 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 07:50 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:39 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-13 18:46 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:16 -0500
PING > FNVW "Amun-erisy-merwyitu" <droopy.bizzle@strong.muffy> - 2015-08-16 01:33 +0000
Re: PING > FNVW "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:43 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 16:02 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-13 19:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:33 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:12 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Mitchell Holman <noemail@att.net> - 2015-08-14 15:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Mitchell Holman <noemail@att.net> - 2015-08-14 20:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 08:07 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 10:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 04:59 +0200
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-13 22:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-14 18:33 -0700
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 02:53 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-13 09:32 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 10:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 06:45 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 10:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:35 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:21 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) second try "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) second try "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:26 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:59 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:33 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:32 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 08:17 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 17:14 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 00:01 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:52 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:25 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 06:54 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-12 15:48 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 10:58 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:35 -0500
2 Jeanne Douglas (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 08:48 -0500
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:53 +0000
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 12:23 -0700
Proving Hägar is a sack of shit (was: 2 Jeanne Douglas) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:01 -0500
Re: Proving H?gar is a sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 20:18 +0000
Re: Proving Hägar is a sack of shit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
Re: Proving H㦡r is a sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 02:16 +0200
Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:13 -0500
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 03:52 +0200
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:20 -0500
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:36 +0000
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 06:14 +0200
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:22 -0500
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 06:59 -0700
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:30 -0500
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 08:17 -0700
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 10:26 -0500
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 15:18 -0400
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:21 +0000
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 20:02 +0200
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 14:30 -0400
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 04:51 +0200
Re: Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:20 +0000
Re: Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:49 -0500
Re: Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 06:12 +0000
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 20:28 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Jim Noles <no_e-mails@nosuchserver.com> - 2015-08-23 17:28 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-08-09 17:57 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 20:55 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 00:54 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 08:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 13:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:17 +0000
? 4 Jim (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:25 -0500
Re: ? 4 Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 22:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 20:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 03:19 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 06:32 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 13:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:21 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 23:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:40 -0500
? 4 jim (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:14 -0500
Re: ? 4 jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 22:43 +0000
Re: ? 4 jim "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:42 -0500
Re: ? 4 jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:16 +0000
Re: ? 4 jim "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:01 -0500
Re: ? 4 jim "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:25 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 14:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:36 +0000
Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:53 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 23:21 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:46 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:17 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 20:37 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 01:52 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:09 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 02:43 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-08-09 18:13 -0700
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:37 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners (was: Nuke Em) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-10 10:49 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 10:27 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-11 14:45 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 14:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-12 16:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 00:39 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 07:49 -0400
Re: Nuke Em BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-09 10:11 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 10:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:31 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 14:17 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 02:44 +0000
Re: Nuke Em edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-08-09 18:07 -0700
Re: Nuke Em edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-08-09 17:42 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 20:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-09 16:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 01:41 -0400
Re: Nuke Em BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-10 11:06 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 10:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:19 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 02:44 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 23:26 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 05:49 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:39 -0500
2nd ? for jim (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:21 -0500
Re: 2nd ? for jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 23:00 +0000
Re: 2nd ? for jim (was: Nuke Em) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:32 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-09 16:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 23:25 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 08:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:44 -0500
Page 6 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 50 Next page →
| From | Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 15:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3036c0b264d9c10598abac@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #263365 |
In article <LcmdnXTw08zajVDInZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, wookiee@att.net says... > > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:8mfo1p.j5k.17.1@news.alt.net... > > Rocky wrote: > >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > >> news:8mfmki.b42.17.1@news.alt.net... > >>> Rocky wrote: > >>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > >>>> news:8mevdh.i7l.19.1@news.alt.net... > >>>>> Rocky wrote: > >>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >>>>>> news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... > >>>>>>> In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >>>>>>>> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... > >>>>>>>>> In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... > >>>>>>>>>>> In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... > >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usenet.kooks removed > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that two > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 110 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Survivors > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stairwell > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should not > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lunatic boi? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specially > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are quite insane. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactivity? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did after > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of what > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocenters. Those > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poor > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bargained > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was a great > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to reality. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media wants > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piles than > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Controlled > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Controlled > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> height of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly where > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> walls will > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Towers neither > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the underground nukes > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the surviving walls and height of the surviving corners > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> places the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deep > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because if they news media had been honest the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries would > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> their bullshit. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> DUH. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> epicenter of an > >>>>>>>>>>>>> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before > >>>>>>>>>>>> 9/11/01. > >>>>>>>>>>>> <G> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Here, this will help: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - > >>>>>>>>>>>> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> What has that got to do with my statement? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and > >>>>>>>>>> over and over > >>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the > >>>>>>>>>> following part > >>>>>>>>>> of it: > >>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Rocky. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground > >>>>>>>> Zero" and not > >>>>>>>> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Again from above: > >>>>>>>> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase > >>>>>>>> "Ground Zero"' > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used to > >>>>>>>> level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" > >>>>>>>> could have > >>>>>>>> been used instead of changing that definition after the Great > >>>>>>>> 9/11 hoax. OK? Rocky > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" > >>>>>>> get planted deep underground... below the WTC... without anybody > >>>>>>> knowing? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And rumor > >>>>>> has it that was part of the reason it took so long to built the > >>>>>> replacement for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a nuke > >>>>>> too. > >>>>>>> Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the > >>>>>>> towers a mass hallucination? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if it > >>>>>> hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. Here, > >>>>>> dig this video > >>>>>> and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to > >>>>>> make a CGI slide right into the South Tower.: > >>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s > >>>>>> > >>>>>> And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real > >>>>>> world can be found here: > >>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a lot of > >>>>>> videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: > >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can easily > >>>>>> be recreated by 3D software and if they leave the default setting > >>>>>> where the wings reflect the sky. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the > >>>>>> above video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on 9/11/01 > >>>>>> but it took be a little bit longer before I could accept the fact the > >>>>>> Twin Towers were nuked. > >>>>>> Rocky > >>>>> > >>>>> they weren't real buildings they were holograms > >>>> > >>>> Given all the inconsistencies with the placement of helicopters and > >>>> the background something was most certainly strange about the > >>>> background images but all I can say for sure is Ground Zero was > >>>> called "Ground Zero" for the original meaning of that phrase and not > >>>> the post 9/11 definition of that phrase. > >>>> > >>>> Rocky > >>> > >>> i call it the day the trade towers got knocked down > >> > >> But don't stop there because they floated away for the next month and > >> maybe longer. And given how long they floated away also supports the > >> fact they were nuked and that the original meaning of "Ground Zero" > >> applies to > >> Ground Zero and the definition of Ground Zero did not really have to be > >> changed after 9/11/01. > >> > >> Rocky > > > > there was no ground zero > > ROTFLMAO because it is consistent with other Ground Zeros after you consider > a large amount of debris floated away, that there were EMPs recorded by WCBS > in Nuke York City when the North Tower was vaporized and there was a lot of > clean up of radioactive waste like where they kept washing boots off because > that is SOP for places where there is a lot of radiation. > > Rocky I'm on the Left Coast, and I remember seeing several floors of the tower float past my house that day, although I didn't know what they were at the time. I was like "OMG!" -- Checkmate Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-14 09:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lv6dnYe6fbT6a1DInZ2dnUU7-X2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #263369 |
"Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message news:MPG.3036c0b264d9c10598abac@news.altopia.com... > In article <LcmdnXTw08zajVDInZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > wookiee@att.net says... > > >> >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:8mfo1p.j5k.17.1@news.alt.net... >> > Rocky wrote: >> >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:8mfmki.b42.17.1@news.alt.net... >> >>> Rocky wrote: >> >>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >>>> news:8mevdh.i7l.19.1@news.alt.net... >> >>>>> Rocky wrote: >> >>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> >>>>>> news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... >> >>>>>>> In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> >>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> >>>>>>>> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... >> >>>>>>>>> In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> >>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> >>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... >> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> >>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> >>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usenet.kooks removed >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that two >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 110 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Survivors >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stairwell >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should not >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lunatic boi? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specially >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are quite insane. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactivity? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell you >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did after >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of what >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocenters. Those >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poor >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bargained >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was a great >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to reality. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media wants >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piles than >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Controlled >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Controlled >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> height of >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly where >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> walls will >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Towers neither >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the underground nukes >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the surviving walls and height of the surviving >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corners >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> places the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deep >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because if they news media had been honest the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries would >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> their bullshit. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> DUH. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> epicenter of an >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not necessarily confined to that strict >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before >> >>>>>>>>>>>> 9/11/01. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <G> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Here, this will help: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - >> >>>>>>>>>>>> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> What has that got to do with my statement? >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and >> >>>>>>>>>> over and over >> >>>>>>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>>>> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the >> >>>>>>>>>> following part >> >>>>>>>>>> of it: >> >>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Rocky. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground >> >>>>>>>> Zero" and not >> >>>>>>>> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Again from above: >> >>>>>>>> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase >> >>>>>>>> "Ground Zero"' >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used to >> >>>>>>>> level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" >> >>>>>>>> could have >> >>>>>>>> been used instead of changing that definition after the Great >> >>>>>>>> 9/11 hoax. OK? Rocky >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" >> >>>>>>> get planted deep underground... below the WTC... without anybody >> >>>>>>> knowing? >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And rumor >> >>>>>> has it that was part of the reason it took so long to built the >> >>>>>> replacement for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a nuke >> >>>>>> too. >> >>>>>>> Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the >> >>>>>>> towers a mass hallucination? >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if it >> >>>>>> hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. Here, >> >>>>>> dig this video >> >>>>>> and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to >> >>>>>> make a CGI slide right into the South Tower.: >> >>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real >> >>>>>> world can be found here: >> >>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a lot of >> >>>>>> videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: >> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can easily >> >>>>>> be recreated by 3D software and if they leave the default setting >> >>>>>> where the wings reflect the sky. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the >> >>>>>> above video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on >> >>>>>> 9/11/01 >> >>>>>> but it took be a little bit longer before I could accept the fact >> >>>>>> the >> >>>>>> Twin Towers were nuked. >> >>>>>> Rocky >> >>>>> >> >>>>> they weren't real buildings they were holograms >> >>>> >> >>>> Given all the inconsistencies with the placement of helicopters and >> >>>> the background something was most certainly strange about the >> >>>> background images but all I can say for sure is Ground Zero was >> >>>> called "Ground Zero" for the original meaning of that phrase and not >> >>>> the post 9/11 definition of that phrase. >> >>>> >> >>>> Rocky >> >>> >> >>> i call it the day the trade towers got knocked down >> >> >> >> But don't stop there because they floated away for the next month and >> >> maybe longer. And given how long they floated away also supports the >> >> fact they were nuked and that the original meaning of "Ground Zero" >> >> applies to >> >> Ground Zero and the definition of Ground Zero did not really have to >> >> be >> >> changed after 9/11/01. >> >> >> >> Rocky >> > >> > there was no ground zero >> >> ROTFLMAO because it is consistent with other Ground Zeros after you >> consider >> a large amount of debris floated away, that there were EMPs recorded by >> WCBS >> in Nuke York City when the North Tower was vaporized and there was a lot >> of >> clean up of radioactive waste like where they kept washing boots off >> because >> that is SOP for places where there is a lot of radiation. >> >> Rocky > > I'm on the Left Coast, and I remember seeing several floors of the tower > float past my house that day, although I didn't know what they were at > the time. I was like "OMG!" What I think is funny is someone started a story about them shipping the steel from the Twin Towers to China. I always reply with what steel because there was next to nothing left after they were vaporized and floated away. Or if they shipped the steel to China they did it via Jet Stream after it floated up into the clouds. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-14 07:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30379dceb77f095598abb7@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #263414 |
In article <lv6dnYe6fbT6a1DInZ2dnUU7-X2dnZ2d@giganews.com>, wookiee@att.net says... > > "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > news:MPG.3036c0b264d9c10598abac@news.altopia.com... > > In article <LcmdnXTw08zajVDInZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > > wookiee@att.net says... > > > > > >> > >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > >> news:8mfo1p.j5k.17.1@news.alt.net... > >> > Rocky wrote: > >> >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > >> >> news:8mfmki.b42.17.1@news.alt.net... > >> >>> Rocky wrote: > >> >>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > >> >>>> news:8mevdh.i7l.19.1@news.alt.net... > >> >>>>> Rocky wrote: > >> >>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >> >>>>>> news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... > >> >>>>>>> In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >> >>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >> >>>>>>>> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... > >> >>>>>>>>> In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >> >>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >> >>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... > >> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >> >>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usenet.kooks removed > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that two > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 110 > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Survivors > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stairwell > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should not > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lunatic boi? > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specially > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are quite insane. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactivity? > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell you > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did after > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of what > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocenters. Those > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poor > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bargained > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was a great > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to reality. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media wants > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piles than > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Controlled > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Controlled > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> height of > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly where > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> walls will > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Towers neither > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the underground nukes > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the surviving walls and height of the surviving > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corners > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> places the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deep > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because if they news media had been honest the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries would > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> their bullshit. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> DUH. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> epicenter of an > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not necessarily confined to that strict > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> 9/11/01. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <G> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Here, this will help: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> What has that got to do with my statement? > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and > >> >>>>>>>>>> over and over > >> >>>>>>>>>> and > >> >>>>>>>>>> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the > >> >>>>>>>>>> following part > >> >>>>>>>>>> of it: > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Rocky. > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground > >> >>>>>>>> Zero" and not > >> >>>>>>>> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Again from above: > >> >>>>>>>> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase > >> >>>>>>>> "Ground Zero"' > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used to > >> >>>>>>>> level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" > >> >>>>>>>> could have > >> >>>>>>>> been used instead of changing that definition after the Great > >> >>>>>>>> 9/11 hoax. OK? Rocky > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" > >> >>>>>>> get planted deep underground... below the WTC... without anybody > >> >>>>>>> knowing? > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And rumor > >> >>>>>> has it that was part of the reason it took so long to built the > >> >>>>>> replacement for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a nuke > >> >>>>>> too. > >> >>>>>>> Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the > >> >>>>>>> towers a mass hallucination? > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if it > >> >>>>>> hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. Here, > >> >>>>>> dig this video > >> >>>>>> and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to > >> >>>>>> make a CGI slide right into the South Tower.: > >> >>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real > >> >>>>>> world can be found here: > >> >>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a lot of > >> >>>>>> videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: > >> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can easily > >> >>>>>> be recreated by 3D software and if they leave the default setting > >> >>>>>> where the wings reflect the sky. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the > >> >>>>>> above video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on > >> >>>>>> 9/11/01 > >> >>>>>> but it took be a little bit longer before I could accept the fact > >> >>>>>> the > >> >>>>>> Twin Towers were nuked. > >> >>>>>> Rocky > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> they weren't real buildings they were holograms > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Given all the inconsistencies with the placement of helicopters and > >> >>>> the background something was most certainly strange about the > >> >>>> background images but all I can say for sure is Ground Zero was > >> >>>> called "Ground Zero" for the original meaning of that phrase and not > >> >>>> the post 9/11 definition of that phrase. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Rocky > >> >>> > >> >>> i call it the day the trade towers got knocked down > >> >> > >> >> But don't stop there because they floated away for the next month and > >> >> maybe longer. And given how long they floated away also supports the > >> >> fact they were nuked and that the original meaning of "Ground Zero" > >> >> applies to > >> >> Ground Zero and the definition of Ground Zero did not really have to > >> >> be > >> >> changed after 9/11/01. > >> >> > >> >> Rocky > >> > > >> > there was no ground zero > >> > >> ROTFLMAO because it is consistent with other Ground Zeros after you > >> consider > >> a large amount of debris floated away, that there were EMPs recorded by > >> WCBS > >> in Nuke York City when the North Tower was vaporized and there was a lot > >> of > >> clean up of radioactive waste like where they kept washing boots off > >> because > >> that is SOP for places where there is a lot of radiation. > >> > >> Rocky > > > > I'm on the Left Coast, and I remember seeing several floors of the tower > > float past my house that day, although I didn't know what they were at > > the time. I was like "OMG!" > > What I think is funny is someone started a story about them shipping the > steel from the Twin Towers to China. I always reply with what steel because > there was next to nothing left after they were vaporized and floated away. > > Or if they shipped the steel to China they did it via Jet Stream after it > floated up into the clouds. > > Rocky The problem with using the jet stream as a delivery system, is getting the steel back down in the proper place. A giant electromagnet might work, but then you have to take into account the velocity when it all starts plummeting back to earth. You'd have to have a large unpopulated area to do that. -- Checkmate Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-14 08:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8mhnrl.lku.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #263414 |
Rocky wrote: > "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > news:MPG.3036c0b264d9c10598abac@news.altopia.com... >> In article <LcmdnXTw08zajVDInZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> wookiee@att.net says... >> >> >>> >>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:8mfo1p.j5k.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:8mfmki.b42.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:8mevdh.i7l.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>> In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usenet.kooks removed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prove that two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 110 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave Survivors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stairwell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just happened >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> required specially >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are quite insane. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that? How do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactivity? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also tell you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they did after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full of what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocenters. Those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they bargained >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> netko0k. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9/11 was a great >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media to reality. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media wants >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piles than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the height of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly where >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> walls will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Twin Towers neither >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the underground nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> height of the surviving walls and height of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corners >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> places the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deep >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because if they news media had been honest the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DUH. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> epicenter of an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not necessarily confined to that strict >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before 9/11/01. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <G> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here, this will help: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What has that got to do with my statement? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and >>>>>>>>>>>>> over and over >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at >>>>>>>>>>>>> the following part >>>>>>>>>>>>> of it: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground >>>>>>>>>>> Zero" and not >>>>>>>>>>> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Again from above: >>>>>>>>>>> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase >>>>>>>>>>> "Ground Zero"' >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were >>>>>>>>>>> used to level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground >>>>>>>>>>> Zero" could have >>>>>>>>>>> been used instead of changing that definition after the >>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax. OK? Rocky >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the >>>>>>>>>> "nukes" get planted deep underground... below the WTC... without >>>>>>>>>> anybody knowing? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And >>>>>>>>> rumor has it that was part of the reason it took so long to built >>>>>>>>> the replacement for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a >>>>>>>>> nuke too. >>>>>>>>>> Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the >>>>>>>>>> towers a mass hallucination? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if >>>>>>>>> it hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. >>>>>>>>> Here, dig this video >>>>>>>>> and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to >>>>>>>>> make a CGI slide right into the South Tower.: >>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real >>>>>>>>> world can be found here: >>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a >>>>>>>>> lot of videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: >>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can >>>>>>>>> easily be recreated by 3D software and if they leave the default >>>>>>>>> setting where the wings reflect the sky. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the >>>>>>>>> above video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on >>>>>>>>> 9/11/01 >>>>>>>>> but it took be a little bit longer before I could accept the >>>>>>>>> fact the >>>>>>>>> Twin Towers were nuked. >>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> they weren't real buildings they were holograms >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Given all the inconsistencies with the placement of helicopters >>>>>>> and the background something was most certainly strange about the >>>>>>> background images but all I can say for sure is Ground Zero was >>>>>>> called "Ground Zero" for the original meaning of that phrase >>>>>>> and not the post 9/11 definition of that phrase. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>> >>>>>> i call it the day the trade towers got knocked down >>>>> >>>>> But don't stop there because they floated away for the next month >>>>> and maybe longer. And given how long they floated away also supports >>>>> the fact they were nuked and that the original meaning of "Ground >>>>> Zero" applies to >>>>> Ground Zero and the definition of Ground Zero did not really have >>>>> to be >>>>> changed after 9/11/01. >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> there was no ground zero >>> >>> ROTFLMAO because it is consistent with other Ground Zeros after you >>> consider >>> a large amount of debris floated away, that there were EMPs >>> recorded by WCBS >>> in Nuke York City when the North Tower was vaporized and there was >>> a lot of >>> clean up of radioactive waste like where they kept washing boots off >>> because >>> that is SOP for places where there is a lot of radiation. >>> >>> Rocky >> >> I'm on the Left Coast, and I remember seeing several floors of the >> tower float past my house that day, although I didn't know what they were >> at the time. I was like "OMG!" > > What I think is funny is someone started a story about them shipping > the steel from the Twin Towers to China. I always reply with what steel > because there was next to nothing left after they were vaporized and > floated > away. > Or if they shipped the steel to China they did it via Jet Stream > after it floated up into the clouds. > > Rocky i have it in my back yard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-14 17:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <4fk1ac-p15.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #263414 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > What I think is funny is someone started a story about them shipping the > steel from the Twin Towers to China. I always reply with what steel because > there was next to nothing left after they were vaporized and floated away. > > Or if they shipped the steel to China they did it via Jet Stream after it > floated up into the clouds. > > Rocky Insane. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 11:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MaGdnWT7SKLC_lLInZ2dnUU7-K-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #263445 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:4fk1ac-p15.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> What I think is funny is someone started a story about them shipping the >> steel from the Twin Towers to China. I always reply with what steel >> because >> there was next to nothing left after they were vaporized and floated >> away. >> >> Or if they shipped the steel to China they did it via Jet Stream after it >> floated up into the clouds. >> >> Rocky > > Insane. Nobody asked what the doctors called you 'tupid. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 16:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <7i74ac-t8p.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #263543 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:4fk1ac-p15.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> What I think is funny is someone started a story about them shipping the >>> steel from the Twin Towers to China. I always reply with what steel >>> because >>> there was next to nothing left after they were vaporized and floated >>> away. >>> >>> Or if they shipped the steel to China they did it via Jet Stream after it >>> floated up into the clouds. >>> >>> Rocky >> >> Insane. > > Nobody asked what the doctors called you 'tupid. > > Rocky I should have been more explicit; you are an insane, babbling kook with a luke warm IQ. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 19:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <OM2dnRr-e_elSFLInZ2dnUU7-RednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #263564 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:7i74ac-t8p.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:4fk1ac-p15.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> What I think is funny is someone started a story about them shipping >>>> the >>>> steel from the Twin Towers to China. I always reply with what steel >>>> because >>>> there was next to nothing left after they were vaporized and floated >>>> away. >>>> >>>> Or if they shipped the steel to China they did it via Jet Stream after >>>> it >>>> floated up into the clouds. >>>> >>>> Rocky >>> >>> Insane. >> >> Nobody asked what the doctors called you 'tupid. >> >> Rocky > > I should have been more explicit; you are an insane, babbling kook with > a luke warm IQ. And you have just been caught falling for the obvious bullshit stories of the Pentagon and Prankville, PA. See: First a quote from you then my reply: > One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the > western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. ROTFLMAO and I'm still laughing because the alleged crashes of Flight 77 and Flight 93 were certainly bogus stories because there was no consistency between them and real crashes of airliners. The lack of parts at the Pentagon and the fact none of the videos taken around the Pentagon had a commercial jet in them prove the Flight 77 story was bullshit and the lack of parts at the Pranksville, PA site prove that story was bullshit also. Then if you look at the crash dynamics of the other two flights those two were bogus and if you view the "Surviving Corners" of the Twin Towers in the photo below you see the remains of an NCD meaning the two jets in Nuke York City, either real or CGIs were not needed to bring down the Twin Towers. http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5090/1289/1600/Ground%20Zero%20on%209111.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 00:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ps35ac-cks.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #263620 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:7i74ac-t8p.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:4fk1ac-p15.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> What I think is funny is someone started a story about them shipping >>>>> the >>>>> steel from the Twin Towers to China. I always reply with what steel >>>>> because >>>>> there was next to nothing left after they were vaporized and floated >>>>> away. >>>>> >>>>> Or if they shipped the steel to China they did it via Jet Stream after >>>>> it >>>>> floated up into the clouds. >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> Insane. >>> >>> Nobody asked what the doctors called you 'tupid. >>> >>> Rocky >> >> I should have been more explicit; you are an insane, babbling kook with >> a luke warm IQ. > > And you have just been caught falling for the obvious bullshit stories of > the Pentagon and Prankville, PA. See: The only obvious bullshit is your insane rant, kook. <snip remaing kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 22:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ahjv9c-if8.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #263365 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > ROTFLMAO because it is consistent with other Ground Zeros after you consider > a large amount of debris floated away, that there were EMPs recorded by WCBS > in Nuke York City when the North Tower was vaporized and there was a lot of > clean up of radioactive waste like where they kept washing boots off because > that is SOP for places where there is a lot of radiation. > > Rocky You really are quite insane. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 17:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8mg0n2.63u.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #263365 |
Rocky wrote: > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:8mfo1p.j5k.17.1@news.alt.net... >> Rocky wrote: >>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:8mfmki.b42.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:8mevdh.i7l.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>> In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>> In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usenet.kooks removed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prove that two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 110 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave Survivors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stairwell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> required specially >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are quite insane. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that? How do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactivity? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also tell you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they did after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full of what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocenters. Those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bargained >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> netko0k. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9/11 was a great >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media to reality. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media wants >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piles than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> height of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly where >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> walls will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Towers neither >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the underground nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the surviving walls and height of the surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corners places the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deep >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because if they news media had been honest the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DUH. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> epicenter of an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not necessarily confined to that strict >>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation. HTH >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for >>>>>>>>>>>>> before 9/11/01. >>>>>>>>>>>>> <G> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Here, this will help: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - >>>>>>>>>>>>> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What has that got to do with my statement? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and >>>>>>>>>>> over and over >>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the >>>>>>>>>>> following part >>>>>>>>>>> of it: >>>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Rocky. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground >>>>>>>>> Zero" and not >>>>>>>>> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Again from above: >>>>>>>>> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase >>>>>>>>> "Ground Zero"' >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used >>>>>>>>> to level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" >>>>>>>>> could have >>>>>>>>> been used instead of changing that definition after the Great >>>>>>>>> 9/11 hoax. OK? Rocky >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" >>>>>>>> get planted deep underground... below the WTC... without >>>>>>>> anybody knowing? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And >>>>>>> rumor has it that was part of the reason it took so long to built >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> replacement for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a nuke >>>>>>> too. >>>>>>>> Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the >>>>>>>> towers a mass hallucination? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if it >>>>>>> hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. Here, >>>>>>> dig this video >>>>>>> and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to >>>>>>> make a CGI slide right into the South Tower.: >>>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real >>>>>>> world can be found here: >>>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a lot >>>>>>> of videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can >>>>>>> easily be recreated by 3D software and if they leave the default >>>>>>> setting where the wings reflect the sky. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the >>>>>>> above video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on >>>>>>> 9/11/01 but it took be a little bit longer before I could accept the >>>>>>> fact the Twin Towers were nuked. >>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>> >>>>>> they weren't real buildings they were holograms >>>>> >>>>> Given all the inconsistencies with the placement of helicopters >>>>> and the background something was most certainly strange about the >>>>> background images but all I can say for sure is Ground Zero was >>>>> called "Ground Zero" for the original meaning of that phrase and >>>>> not the post 9/11 definition of that phrase. >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> i call it the day the trade towers got knocked down >>> >>> But don't stop there because they floated away for the next month >>> and maybe longer. And given how long they floated away also supports >>> the fact they were nuked and that the original meaning of "Ground Zero" >>> applies to >>> Ground Zero and the definition of Ground Zero did not really have >>> to be changed after 9/11/01. >>> >>> Rocky >> >> there was no ground zero > > ROTFLMAO because it is consistent with other Ground Zeros after you > consider a large amount of debris floated away, that there were EMPs > recorded > by WCBS in Nuke York City when the North Tower was vaporized and there was > a > lot of clean up of radioactive waste like where they kept washing boots > off > because that is SOP for places where there is a lot of radiation. > > Rocky i was in the north tower when if fell
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 17:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3036d1d0f946d85798abaf@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #263380 |
In article <8mg0n2.63u.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > Rocky wrote: > > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:8mfo1p.j5k.17.1@news.alt.net... > >> Rocky wrote: > >>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > >>> news:8mfmki.b42.17.1@news.alt.net... > >>>> Rocky wrote: > >>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > >>>>> news:8mevdh.i7l.19.1@news.alt.net... > >>>>>> Rocky wrote: > >>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >>>>>>> news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... > >>>>>>>> In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... > >>>>>>>>>> In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... > >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usenet.kooks removed > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prove that two > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 110 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave Survivors > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stairwell > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should not > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lunatic boi? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should not be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> required specially > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are quite insane. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that? How do > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactivity? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also tell you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they did after > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full of what > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocenters. Those > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poor > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bargained > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> netko0k. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9/11 was a great > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media to reality. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can not be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media wants > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piles than > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Controlled > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Controlled > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> height of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly where > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> walls will > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Towers neither > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the underground nukes > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the surviving walls and height of the surviving > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corners places the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deep > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because if they news media had been honest the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries would > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their bullshit. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DUH. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> epicenter of an > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not necessarily confined to that strict > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation. HTH > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for > >>>>>>>>>>>>> before 9/11/01. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <G> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Here, this will help: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - > >>>>>>>>>>>>> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> What has that got to do with my statement? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and > >>>>>>>>>>> over and over > >>>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the > >>>>>>>>>>> following part > >>>>>>>>>>> of it: > >>>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Rocky. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground > >>>>>>>>> Zero" and not > >>>>>>>>> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Again from above: > >>>>>>>>> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase > >>>>>>>>> "Ground Zero"' > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used > >>>>>>>>> to level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" > >>>>>>>>> could have > >>>>>>>>> been used instead of changing that definition after the Great > >>>>>>>>> 9/11 hoax. OK? Rocky > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" > >>>>>>>> get planted deep underground... below the WTC... without > >>>>>>>> anybody knowing? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And > >>>>>>> rumor has it that was part of the reason it took so long to built > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>>> replacement for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a nuke > >>>>>>> too. > >>>>>>>> Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the > >>>>>>>> towers a mass hallucination? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if it > >>>>>>> hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. Here, > >>>>>>> dig this video > >>>>>>> and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to > >>>>>>> make a CGI slide right into the South Tower.: > >>>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real > >>>>>>> world can be found here: > >>>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a lot > >>>>>>> of videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: > >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can > >>>>>>> easily be recreated by 3D software and if they leave the default > >>>>>>> setting where the wings reflect the sky. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the > >>>>>>> above video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on > >>>>>>> 9/11/01 but it took be a little bit longer before I could accept the > >>>>>>> fact the Twin Towers were nuked. > >>>>>>> Rocky > >>>>>> > >>>>>> they weren't real buildings they were holograms > >>>>> > >>>>> Given all the inconsistencies with the placement of helicopters > >>>>> and the background something was most certainly strange about the > >>>>> background images but all I can say for sure is Ground Zero was > >>>>> called "Ground Zero" for the original meaning of that phrase and > >>>>> not the post 9/11 definition of that phrase. > >>>>> > >>>>> Rocky > >>>> > >>>> i call it the day the trade towers got knocked down > >>> > >>> But don't stop there because they floated away for the next month > >>> and maybe longer. And given how long they floated away also supports > >>> the fact they were nuked and that the original meaning of "Ground Zero" > >>> applies to > >>> Ground Zero and the definition of Ground Zero did not really have > >>> to be changed after 9/11/01. > >>> > >>> Rocky > >> > >> there was no ground zero > > > > ROTFLMAO because it is consistent with other Ground Zeros after you > > consider a large amount of debris floated away, that there were EMPs > > recorded > > by WCBS in Nuke York City when the North Tower was vaporized and there was > > a > > lot of clean up of radioactive waste like where they kept washing boots > > off > > because that is SOP for places where there is a lot of radiation. > > > > Rocky > > i was in the north tower when if fell Was that YOU? I SAW that! -- Checkmate Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 17:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8mg1e0.ogh.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #263382 |
Checkmate wrote: > In article <8mg0n2.63u.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > >> >> Rocky wrote: >>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:8mfo1p.j5k.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:8mfmki.b42.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:8mevdh.i7l.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>> In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usenet.kooks removed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prove that two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 110 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave Survivors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stairwell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> required specially >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are quite insane. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that? How do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactivity? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also tell you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they did after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full of what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocenters. Those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bargained >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> netko0k. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9/11 was a great >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media to reality. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media wants >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piles than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> height of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly where >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> walls will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Twin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Towers neither >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the underground nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> height >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the surviving walls and height of the surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corners places the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deep >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because if they news media had been honest the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DUH. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> epicenter of an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not necessarily confined to that strict >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation. HTH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before 9/11/01. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <G> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here, this will help: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What has that got to do with my statement? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and >>>>>>>>>>>>> over and over >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> following part >>>>>>>>>>>>> of it: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground >>>>>>>>>>> Zero" and not >>>>>>>>>>> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Again from above: >>>>>>>>>>> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase >>>>>>>>>>> "Ground Zero"' >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used >>>>>>>>>>> to level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground >>>>>>>>>>> Zero" >>>>>>>>>>> could have >>>>>>>>>>> been used instead of changing that definition after the >>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax. OK? Rocky >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the >>>>>>>>>> "nukes" >>>>>>>>>> get planted deep underground... below the WTC... without >>>>>>>>>> anybody knowing? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And >>>>>>>>> rumor has it that was part of the reason it took so long to >>>>>>>>> built >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> replacement for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a >>>>>>>>> nuke >>>>>>>>> too. >>>>>>>>>> Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the >>>>>>>>>> towers a mass hallucination? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if >>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>> hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. >>>>>>>>> Here, >>>>>>>>> dig this video >>>>>>>>> and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to >>>>>>>>> make a CGI slide right into the South Tower.: >>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real >>>>>>>>> world can be found here: >>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a lot >>>>>>>>> of videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: >>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can >>>>>>>>> easily be recreated by 3D software and if they leave the >>>>>>>>> default >>>>>>>>> setting where the wings reflect the sky. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the >>>>>>>>> above video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on >>>>>>>>> 9/11/01 but it took be a little bit longer before I could >>>>>>>>> accept the >>>>>>>>> fact the Twin Towers were nuked. >>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> they weren't real buildings they were holograms >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Given all the inconsistencies with the placement of helicopters >>>>>>> and the background something was most certainly strange about >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> background images but all I can say for sure is Ground Zero was >>>>>>> called "Ground Zero" for the original meaning of that phrase and >>>>>>> not the post 9/11 definition of that phrase. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>> >>>>>> i call it the day the trade towers got knocked down >>>>> >>>>> But don't stop there because they floated away for the next month >>>>> and maybe longer. And given how long they floated away also >>>>> supports >>>>> the fact they were nuked and that the original meaning of "Ground >>>>> Zero" >>>>> applies to >>>>> Ground Zero and the definition of Ground Zero did not really have >>>>> to be changed after 9/11/01. >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> there was no ground zero >>> >>> ROTFLMAO because it is consistent with other Ground Zeros after you >>> consider a large amount of debris floated away, that there were EMPs >>> recorded >>> by WCBS in Nuke York City when the North Tower was vaporized and >>> there was >>> a >>> lot of clean up of radioactive waste like where they kept washing >>> boots >>> off >>> because that is SOP for places where there is a lot of radiation. >>> >>> Rocky >> >> i was in the north tower when it fell > > Was that YOU? I SAW that! yea i was the guy by the fountain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-14 09:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <JYqdnYHKaqwtYFDInZ2dnUU7-aGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #263382 |
"Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message news:MPG.3036d1d0f946d85798abaf@news.altopia.com... > In article <8mg0n2.63u.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > >> >> Rocky wrote: >> > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> > news:8mfo1p.j5k.17.1@news.alt.net... >> >> Rocky wrote: >> >>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >>> news:8mfmki.b42.17.1@news.alt.net... >> >>>> Rocky wrote: >> >>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >>>>> news:8mevdh.i7l.19.1@news.alt.net... >> >>>>>> Rocky wrote: >> >>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> >>>>>>> news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... >> >>>>>>>> In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> >>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> >>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... >> >>>>>>>>>> In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> >>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> >>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... >> >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> >>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usenet.kooks removed >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prove that two >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 110 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave Survivors >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stairwell >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should not >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lunatic boi? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should not be >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> required specially >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are quite insane. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that? How do >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactivity? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also tell you >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they did after >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full of what >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocenters. Those >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poor >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bargained >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> netko0k. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9/11 was a great >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media to reality. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can not be >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media wants >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piles than >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Controlled >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Controlled >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> height of >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly where >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> walls will >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Towers neither >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the underground nukes >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the surviving walls and height of the surviving >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corners places the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deep >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because if they news media had been honest the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries would >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their bullshit. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DUH. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> epicenter of an >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not necessarily confined to that strict >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation. HTH >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> before 9/11/01. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <G> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Here, this will help: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> What has that got to do with my statement? >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and >> >>>>>>>>>>> over and over >> >>>>>>>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>>>>> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the >> >>>>>>>>>>> following part >> >>>>>>>>>>> of it: >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Rocky. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground >> >>>>>>>>> Zero" and not >> >>>>>>>>> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Again from above: >> >>>>>>>>> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase >> >>>>>>>>> "Ground Zero"' >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used >> >>>>>>>>> to level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground >> >>>>>>>>> Zero" >> >>>>>>>>> could have >> >>>>>>>>> been used instead of changing that definition after the Great >> >>>>>>>>> 9/11 hoax. OK? Rocky >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" >> >>>>>>>> get planted deep underground... below the WTC... without >> >>>>>>>> anybody knowing? >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And >> >>>>>>> rumor has it that was part of the reason it took so long to built >> >>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>> replacement for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a nuke >> >>>>>>> too. >> >>>>>>>> Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the >> >>>>>>>> towers a mass hallucination? >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if it >> >>>>>>> hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. Here, >> >>>>>>> dig this video >> >>>>>>> and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to >> >>>>>>> make a CGI slide right into the South Tower.: >> >>>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real >> >>>>>>> world can be found here: >> >>>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a lot >> >>>>>>> of videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: >> >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can >> >>>>>>> easily be recreated by 3D software and if they leave the default >> >>>>>>> setting where the wings reflect the sky. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the >> >>>>>>> above video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on >> >>>>>>> 9/11/01 but it took be a little bit longer before I could accept >> >>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>> fact the Twin Towers were nuked. >> >>>>>>> Rocky >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> they weren't real buildings they were holograms >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Given all the inconsistencies with the placement of helicopters >> >>>>> and the background something was most certainly strange about the >> >>>>> background images but all I can say for sure is Ground Zero was >> >>>>> called "Ground Zero" for the original meaning of that phrase and >> >>>>> not the post 9/11 definition of that phrase. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Rocky >> >>>> >> >>>> i call it the day the trade towers got knocked down >> >>> >> >>> But don't stop there because they floated away for the next month >> >>> and maybe longer. And given how long they floated away also supports >> >>> the fact they were nuked and that the original meaning of "Ground >> >>> Zero" >> >>> applies to >> >>> Ground Zero and the definition of Ground Zero did not really have >> >>> to be changed after 9/11/01. >> >>> >> >>> Rocky >> >> >> >> there was no ground zero >> > >> > ROTFLMAO because it is consistent with other Ground Zeros after you >> > consider a large amount of debris floated away, that there were EMPs >> > recorded >> > by WCBS in Nuke York City when the North Tower was vaporized and there >> > was >> > a >> > lot of clean up of radioactive waste like where they kept washing boots >> > off >> > because that is SOP for places where there is a lot of radiation. >> > >> > Rocky >> >> i was in the north tower when if fell > > Was that YOU? I SAW that! There were 16 people that survived in the North Tower. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2035963/9-11-Anniversary-Miraculous-escape-16-trapped-North-Towers-Stairwell-B.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-14 09:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <FsednRLBmZefZ1DInZ2dnUU7-VednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #263380 |
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8mg0n2.63u.17.1@news.alt.net... > Rocky wrote: >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:8mfo1p.j5k.17.1@news.alt.net... >>> Rocky wrote: >>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:8mfmki.b42.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:8mevdh.i7l.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>> In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>>> In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usenet.kooks removed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prove that two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 110 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave Survivors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stairwell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> required specially >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are quite insane. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that? How do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactivity? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also tell you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they did after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full of what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocenters. Those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bargained >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> netko0k. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9/11 was a great >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media to reality. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media wants >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piles than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> height of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly where >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> walls will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Towers neither >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the underground nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the surviving walls and height of the surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corners places the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deep >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because if they news media had been honest the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DUH. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> epicenter of an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not necessarily confined to that strict >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation. HTH >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> before 9/11/01. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <G> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here, this will help: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What has that got to do with my statement? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and >>>>>>>>>>>> over and over >>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the >>>>>>>>>>>> following part >>>>>>>>>>>> of it: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground >>>>>>>>>> Zero" and not >>>>>>>>>> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Again from above: >>>>>>>>>> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase >>>>>>>>>> "Ground Zero"' >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used >>>>>>>>>> to level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" >>>>>>>>>> could have >>>>>>>>>> been used instead of changing that definition after the Great >>>>>>>>>> 9/11 hoax. OK? Rocky >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" >>>>>>>>> get planted deep underground... below the WTC... without >>>>>>>>> anybody knowing? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And >>>>>>>> rumor has it that was part of the reason it took so long to built >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> replacement for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a nuke >>>>>>>> too. >>>>>>>>> Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the >>>>>>>>> towers a mass hallucination? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if it >>>>>>>> hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. Here, >>>>>>>> dig this video >>>>>>>> and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to >>>>>>>> make a CGI slide right into the South Tower.: >>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real >>>>>>>> world can be found here: >>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a lot >>>>>>>> of videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can >>>>>>>> easily be recreated by 3D software and if they leave the default >>>>>>>> setting where the wings reflect the sky. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the >>>>>>>> above video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on >>>>>>>> 9/11/01 but it took be a little bit longer before I could accept >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> fact the Twin Towers were nuked. >>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>> >>>>>>> they weren't real buildings they were holograms >>>>>> >>>>>> Given all the inconsistencies with the placement of helicopters >>>>>> and the background something was most certainly strange about the >>>>>> background images but all I can say for sure is Ground Zero was >>>>>> called "Ground Zero" for the original meaning of that phrase and >>>>>> not the post 9/11 definition of that phrase. >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> i call it the day the trade towers got knocked down >>>> >>>> But don't stop there because they floated away for the next month >>>> and maybe longer. And given how long they floated away also supports >>>> the fact they were nuked and that the original meaning of "Ground Zero" >>>> applies to >>>> Ground Zero and the definition of Ground Zero did not really have >>>> to be changed after 9/11/01. >>>> >>>> Rocky >>> >>> there was no ground zero >> >> ROTFLMAO because it is consistent with other Ground Zeros after you >> consider a large amount of debris floated away, that there were EMPs >> recorded >> by WCBS in Nuke York City when the North Tower was vaporized and there >> was a >> lot of clean up of radioactive waste like where they kept washing boots >> off >> because that is SOP for places where there is a lot of radiation. >> >> Rocky > > i was in the north tower when if fell If that is true there were about dozen other people with you in Stairwell B and that area was just under the vaporization area for the nuke planted under WTC3. And your name might have even been mentioned in the video about the Miracle of Ladder Company 6. See: http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/wtc/analysis/theories/acfd_miraclecompany_6.htm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-14 04:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kgdrsall1cadr9g2079pcaej5h9lqstbtq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #263365 |
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:46:16 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
[...]
[snip of irrelevant groups.]
>> there was no ground zero
>
>ROTFLMAO because it is consistent with other Ground Zeros after you consider
>a large amount of debris floated away, that there were EMPs recorded by WCBS
Had there been an EMP, the video would have ceased recording at
the point it occurred. Also, the helicopter would have plummeted out
of the sky.
Electronics for both would have fried as a result of the EMP.
This is how we can *know* there was no EMP.
>in Nuke York City when the North Tower was vaporized and there was a lot of
Since it was not vaporized, your lie that it was continues to
fail.
>clean up of radioactive waste like where they kept washing boots off because
>that is SOP for places where there is a lot of radiation.
It's also SOP when boots get dirty from mud, dust and debris.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 22:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fdjv9c-if8.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #263357 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > But don't stop there because they floated away for the next month and maybe > longer. And given how long they floated away also supports the fact they > were nuked and that the original meaning of "Ground Zero" applies to Ground > Zero and the definition of Ground Zero did not really have to be changed > after 9/11/01. > > Rocky The only thing floating is your one lone brain cell floating in the vacuum of your head. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 16:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3036c2365ca86d5498abae@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #263357 |
In article <GbydndIj6_C7llDInZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, wookiee@att.net says... > > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:8mfmki.b42.17.1@news.alt.net... > > Rocky wrote: > >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > >> news:8mevdh.i7l.19.1@news.alt.net... > >>> Rocky wrote: > >>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >>>> news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... > >>>>> In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >>>>> wookiee@att.net says... > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >>>>>> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... > >>>>>>> In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >>>>>>>> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... > >>>>>>>>> In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... > >>>>>>>>>>> In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> usenet.kooks removed > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that two > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 110 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Survivors > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stairwell > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lunatic boi? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specially > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are quite insane. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactivity? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did after > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of what > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the hypocenters. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poor > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bargained > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was a great > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reality. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the media > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wants > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris piles > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> than > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Controlled > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Controlled > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> height of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly where > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest walls > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Towers neither > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the underground nukes > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the surviving walls and height of the surviving corners > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> places the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> deep > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Because if they news media had been honest the dictionaries > >>>>>>>>>>>> would > >>>>>>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>>>>>> have > >>>>>>>>>>>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for their > >>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit. > >>>>>>>>>>>> DUH. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the epicenter > >>>>>>>>>>> of an > >>>>>>>>>>> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, it's > >>>>>>>>>>> not necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. HTH > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before > >>>>>>>>>> 9/11/01. > >>>>>>>>>> <G> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Here, this will help: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - > >>>>>>>>>> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov > >>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> What has that got to do with my statement? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and over > >>>>>>>> and over > >>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the > >>>>>>>> following part > >>>>>>>> of it: > >>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Rocky. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero" > >>>>>> and not > >>>>>> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Again from above: > >>>>>> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase > >>>>>> "Ground Zero"' > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used to > >>>>>> level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" > >>>>>> could have > >>>>>> been used instead of changing that definition after the Great 9/11 > >>>>>> hoax. OK? Rocky > >>>>> > >>>>> Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" get > >>>>> planted deep underground... below the WTC... without anybody > >>>>> knowing? > >>>> > >>>> They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And rumor > >>>> has it that was part of the reason it took so long to built the > >>>> replacement for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a nuke too. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the towers > >>>>> a mass hallucination? > >>>> > >>>> You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if it > >>>> hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. Here, > >>>> dig this video > >>>> and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to make > >>>> a CGI slide right into the South Tower.: > >>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s > >>>> > >>>> And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real world > >>>> can be found here: > >>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s > >>>> > >>>> Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a lot of > >>>> videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: > >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw > >>>> > >>>> Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can easily > >>>> be recreated by 3D software and if they leave the default setting > >>>> where the wings reflect the sky. > >>>> > >>>> I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the above > >>>> video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on 9/11/01 but > >>>> it took be a little bit longer before I could accept the fact the > >>>> Twin Towers were nuked. > >>>> Rocky > >>> > >>> they weren't real buildings they were holograms > >> > >> Given all the inconsistencies with the placement of helicopters and > >> the background something was most certainly strange about the > >> background images but all I can say for sure is Ground Zero was > >> called "Ground Zero" for the original meaning of that phrase and not > >> the post 9/11 definition of that phrase. > >> > >> Rocky > > > > i call it the day the trade towers got knocked down > > But don't stop there because they floated away for the next month and maybe > longer. And given how long they floated away also supports the fact they > were nuked and that the original meaning of "Ground Zero" applies to Ground > Zero and the definition of Ground Zero did not really have to be changed > after 9/11/01. > > Rocky Are you on drugs? -- Checkmate Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 17:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8mg0sb.l5k.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #263376 |
Checkmate wrote: > In article <GbydndIj6_C7llDInZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > wookiee@att.net says... > > >> >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:8mfmki.b42.17.1@news.alt.net... >>> Rocky wrote: >>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:8mevdh.i7l.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>> news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>> In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>> In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>>> In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article >>>>>>>>>>>>> <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usenet.kooks removed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prove >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 110 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Survivors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stairwell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specially >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are quite insane. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactivity? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocenters. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bargained >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> netko0k. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was a great >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media to reality. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wants >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> height of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly where >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> walls >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Towers neither >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the underground nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the surviving walls and height of the surviving corners >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> places the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deep >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because if they news media had been honest the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries >>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> their bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> DUH. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the >>>>>>>>>>>>> epicenter >>>>>>>>>>>>> of an >>>>>>>>>>>>> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, >>>>>>>>>>>>> it's >>>>>>>>>>>>> not necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. >>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before >>>>>>>>>>>> 9/11/01. >>>>>>>>>>>> <G> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Here, this will help: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - >>>>>>>>>>>> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What has that got to do with my statement? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and >>>>>>>>>> over >>>>>>>>>> and over >>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the >>>>>>>>>> following part >>>>>>>>>> of it: >>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Rocky. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground >>>>>>>> Zero" >>>>>>>> and not >>>>>>>> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Again from above: >>>>>>>> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase >>>>>>>> "Ground Zero"' >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used to >>>>>>>> level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" >>>>>>>> could have >>>>>>>> been used instead of changing that definition after the Great >>>>>>>> 9/11 >>>>>>>> hoax. OK? Rocky >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" >>>>>>> get >>>>>>> planted deep underground... below the WTC... without anybody >>>>>>> knowing? >>>>>> >>>>>> They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And rumor >>>>>> has it that was part of the reason it took so long to built the >>>>>> replacement for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a nuke >>>>>> too. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the >>>>>>> towers >>>>>>> a mass hallucination? >>>>>> >>>>>> You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if it >>>>>> hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. >>>>>> Here, >>>>>> dig this video >>>>>> and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to >>>>>> make >>>>>> a CGI slide right into the South Tower.: >>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s >>>>>> >>>>>> And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real >>>>>> world >>>>>> can be found here: >>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s >>>>>> >>>>>> Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a lot of >>>>>> videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can >>>>>> easily >>>>>> be recreated by 3D software and if they leave the default setting >>>>>> where the wings reflect the sky. >>>>>> >>>>>> I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the >>>>>> above >>>>>> video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on 9/11/01 >>>>>> but >>>>>> it took be a little bit longer before I could accept the fact the >>>>>> Twin Towers were nuked. >>>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> they weren't real buildings they were holograms >>>> >>>> Given all the inconsistencies with the placement of helicopters and >>>> the background something was most certainly strange about the >>>> background images but all I can say for sure is Ground Zero was >>>> called "Ground Zero" for the original meaning of that phrase and >>>> not >>>> the post 9/11 definition of that phrase. >>>> >>>> Rocky >>> >>> i call it the day the trade towers got knocked down >> >> But don't stop there because they floated away for the next month >> and maybe longer. And given how long they floated away also >> supports the fact they >> were nuked and that the original meaning of "Ground Zero" applies to >> Ground >> Zero and the definition of Ground Zero did not really have to be >> changed >> after 9/11/01. >> >> Rocky > > Are you on drugs? he should be
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-14 09:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vN2dnYsDJ7aAYVDInZ2dnUU7-QednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #263381 |
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8mg0sb.l5k.19.1@news.alt.net... > Checkmate wrote: >> In article <GbydndIj6_C7llDInZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> wookiee@att.net says... >> >> >>> >>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:8mfmki.b42.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:8mevdh.i7l.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>> In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>> In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usenet.kooks removed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prove >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 110 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Survivors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stairwell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specially >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are quite insane. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactivity? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocenters. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bargained >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> netko0k. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was a great >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media to reality. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wants >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> height of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly where >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> walls >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Towers neither >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the underground nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the surviving walls and height of the surviving corners >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> places the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deep >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because if they news media had been honest the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DUH. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> epicenter >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before >>>>>>>>>>>>> 9/11/01. >>>>>>>>>>>>> <G> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Here, this will help: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - >>>>>>>>>>>>> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What has that got to do with my statement? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and >>>>>>>>>>> over >>>>>>>>>>> and over >>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the >>>>>>>>>>> following part >>>>>>>>>>> of it: >>>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Rocky. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground >>>>>>>>> Zero" >>>>>>>>> and not >>>>>>>>> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Again from above: >>>>>>>>> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase >>>>>>>>> "Ground Zero"' >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used to >>>>>>>>> level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" >>>>>>>>> could have >>>>>>>>> been used instead of changing that definition after the Great >>>>>>>>> 9/11 >>>>>>>>> hoax. OK? Rocky >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" >>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>> planted deep underground... below the WTC... without anybody >>>>>>>> knowing? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And rumor >>>>>>> has it that was part of the reason it took so long to built the >>>>>>> replacement for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a nuke >>>>>>> too. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the >>>>>>>> towers >>>>>>>> a mass hallucination? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if it >>>>>>> hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. >>>>>>> Here, >>>>>>> dig this video >>>>>>> and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to >>>>>>> make >>>>>>> a CGI slide right into the South Tower.: >>>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real >>>>>>> world >>>>>>> can be found here: >>>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a lot of >>>>>>> videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can >>>>>>> easily >>>>>>> be recreated by 3D software and if they leave the default setting >>>>>>> where the wings reflect the sky. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the >>>>>>> above >>>>>>> video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on 9/11/01 >>>>>>> but >>>>>>> it took be a little bit longer before I could accept the fact the >>>>>>> Twin Towers were nuked. >>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>> >>>>>> they weren't real buildings they were holograms >>>>> >>>>> Given all the inconsistencies with the placement of helicopters and >>>>> the background something was most certainly strange about the >>>>> background images but all I can say for sure is Ground Zero was >>>>> called "Ground Zero" for the original meaning of that phrase and >>>>> not >>>>> the post 9/11 definition of that phrase. >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> i call it the day the trade towers got knocked down >>> >>> But don't stop there because they floated away for the next month >>> and maybe longer. And given how long they floated away also >>> supports the fact they >>> were nuked and that the original meaning of "Ground Zero" applies to >>> Ground >>> Zero and the definition of Ground Zero did not really have to be >>> changed >>> after 9/11/01. >>> >>> Rocky >> >> Are you on drugs? > > he should be I'm not a mind reader. If you question something let me know because I have no reason to believe any part of the Official Story especially since there are so many inconsistencies in it. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.conspiracy
csiph-web