Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #262751 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-08 19:36 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-09 15:44 -0500 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 53 participants
Thread has 1017 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to alt.conspiracy | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1017 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 19:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 00:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 20:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 01:27 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 20:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 03:16 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 06:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:14 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 13:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 14:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 20:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:11 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 20:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 01:51 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 02:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 23:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 01:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 06:37 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 13:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 13:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 05:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 10:19 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 10:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 13:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 18:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 14:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 20:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 15:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 21:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 16:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 21:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 16:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-15 16:11 -0600
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (laughing at Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (laughing at Jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 00:57 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 16:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-09 22:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Mattb. <trdell1234@outlook.com> - 2015-08-09 22:35 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 02:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 08:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em 2-Methyl-2-Chlorobutyl-Methylphenol-CinnamylN1-Methylbutyrate <distracted.blonde.ammunition-whore@alt.comedy.thin-lingerie-lass> - 2015-08-10 09:39 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "grizzled laggard" <degenerate.haddock.pasty@unsatisfactory.kookooyumyumpoon> - 2015-08-13 01:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 04:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "broken down loafer" <indelicate.meat.napkin@tender.biff> - 2015-08-13 10:07 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:44 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:01 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 07:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 07:34 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 18:16 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:35 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 17:54 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:04 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 10:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:34 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:09 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 11:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:00 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:00 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:33 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 11:02 -0500
Re: Nuke Em dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-12 10:35 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 14:20 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 14:44 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 17:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 15:52 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-12 20:44 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 07:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 07:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 15:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:14 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:24 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 15:57 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:09 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 07:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 08:47 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:17 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 16:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 00:59 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-13 22:49 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 17:06 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 17:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 17:18 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-13 22:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 16:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 17:09 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-14 11:21 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 11:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 10:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 07:44 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 11:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 09:32 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:21 +0000
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:20 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 06:27 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 07:08 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 12:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 07:21 -0400
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 22:43 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:50 -0500
Re: Nuke Em BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-16 11:53 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:24 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 16:59 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 06:50 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 10:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:24 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:09 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:26 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 07:12 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 10:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:24 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 20:48 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 17:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-15 16:04 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 23:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 01:01 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 23:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 01:04 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:21 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Khepernefru II" <gimpy.cock.squeezer@rattle.boned.hoo-hoo> - 2015-08-17 00:04 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:31 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:24 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:24 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 03:35 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:45 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 06:54 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 07:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 11:47 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 19:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 18:23 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 19:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 03:34 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-15 22:08 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 05:14 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Halstead Lippergold-onnerhall" <holy@mackerel.orgy> - 2015-08-16 13:54 +0800
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 07:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:14 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 17:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 19:36 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:51 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 06:53 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Surviving the Halstead shit storm) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:32 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Surviving the Halstead shit storm) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:52 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 06:00 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 06:51 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 12:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:45 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 15:28 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 15:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 15:19 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 19:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 17:18 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah now %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah now %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 18:22 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 00:19 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Jim's meltdown) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 21:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Jim's meltdown) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 04:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 20:53 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:31 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-17 16:12 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-17 12:06 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 19:04 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:22 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-08-17 18:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:27 +0200
Question for FNV "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:37 -0500
Re: Question for FNV "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:42 -0500
Re: Question for FNV Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 20:00 -0400
Re: Question for FNV "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:16 -0500
Re: Question for FNV Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 06:32 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:14 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:49 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:27 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:59 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 22:30 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 18:32 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 22:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:54 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 23:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 03:42 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 06:50 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:16 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:33 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Dr. Morpheus" <d.morpheus@debunkers.ie> - 2015-08-17 23:42 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Dr. Morpheus" <d.morpheus@debunkers.ie> - 2015-08-18 02:50 +0200
Dook Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-18 03:43 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 10:26 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-18 16:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Dr. Morpheus" <d.morpheus@debunkers.ie> - 2015-08-18 19:52 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 02:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 06:57 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 11:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 17:01 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-17 10:20 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:27 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 18:06 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 13:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 19:38 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:11 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:36 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-17 14:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 18:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:39 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-18 09:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-18 09:34 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 21:17 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:19 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:40 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 23:19 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 20:03 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 22:51 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needs help ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needs help ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 02:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needs help ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 07:04 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needsa lot of help ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needsa lot of help ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 05:13 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 10:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:19 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:44 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 08:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 20:49 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 19:50 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 06:59 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 06:02 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 19:23 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 19:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 23:12 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 21:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 02:59 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:10 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <anon@anon.anon> - 2015-08-17 17:34 +0800
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:02 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@rec.games.video.crossdressing> - 2015-08-18 20:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:56 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 07:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:00 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:22 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:46 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:20 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:12 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:39 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:12 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:55 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:13 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:10 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 07:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 08:59 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:25 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:48 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 15:22 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 15:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:04 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:46 +0000
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-20 16:09 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Joe Cooper <dragon40@removeunseen.is> - 2015-08-20 22:26 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-20 22:36 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 21:29 +0000
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-22 04:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 16:19 +0000
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 16:21 +0000
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:52 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 07:00 -0400
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:53 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) doug.bollen@rocketmail.com - 2015-08-23 03:56 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 09:03 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) doug.bollen@rocketmail.com - 2015-08-23 03:57 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 09:04 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-22 04:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-22 14:36 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 09:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-22 17:19 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:51 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:57 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) doug.bollen@rocketmail.com - 2015-08-23 03:55 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 09:05 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:56 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:54 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) doug.bollen@rocketmail.com - 2015-08-23 03:56 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 09:06 -0500
Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:15 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:23 +0000
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:00 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 15:58 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 16:33 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 17:07 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 23:48 +0100
Re: Topaz terrorist je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-24 16:11 -0700
Re: Topaz terrorist BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:17 -0400
Re: Topaz terrorist BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:39 -0400
Re: Topaz terrorist Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 05:36 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 10:21 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:02 +0000
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's & Jim's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:48 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's & Jim's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:15 +0000
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:05 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 09:05 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 18:27 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:50 +0000
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:38 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-29 03:44 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-29 04:43 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:08 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 17:18 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:53 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 14:37 -0700
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:39 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 15:54 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:45 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:17 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 06:40 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:15 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:46 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 15:56 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:05 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-30 03:19 -0700
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:46 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:12 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:34 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:50 -0700
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 01:57 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:44 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:17 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 16:51 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:36 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:46 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:25 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:17 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-03 16:29 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 16:57 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 15:48 -0700
Re: Rocky still jobless and crazy as a loon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 22:42 +0000
Re: Re: Rocky still jobless and crazy as a loon Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:23 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:42 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:59 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-04 09:43 -0700
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:22 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-04 08:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:26 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:19 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 06:03 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 03:58 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:28 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Thanks Topaz) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:54 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:14 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 12:40 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:42 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:44 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:37 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:32 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 05:05 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:38 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-02 06:37 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:27 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-02 18:50 -0400
Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-03 06:00 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-03 16:36 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-04 08:00 +0200
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:29 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:19 +0200
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 06:05 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 19:53 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 21:53 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:53 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:20 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:47 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:38 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:54 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:43 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 16:56 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:26 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 17:28 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:39 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 09:52 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 13:07 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 15:56 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 16:53 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:56 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:52 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 16:57 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 17:33 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-26 04:01 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 13:14 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 20:18 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-19 19:36 -0400
Re: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-20 16:11 -0500
No Holograms (was: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:42 -0500
Re: No Holograms (was: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 09:30 -0500
Re: No Holograms jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:51 +0000
Re: Re: No Holograms Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:07 -0500
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 09:07 -0400
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:37 +0000
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 13:37 -0400
Re: Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 17:07 -0500
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:23 +0200
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 08:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-19 15:48 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 11:02 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 19:22 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 20:39 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-19 19:43 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@alt.support.just.venting> - 2015-08-21 10:48 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 08:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 19:10 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:55 -0500
2 Rick (was: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:31 -0500
Re: 2 Rick (was: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:22 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-18 09:45 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:37 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:02 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-26 13:18 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 15:17 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 12:00 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 20:36 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 17:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 00:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 01:16 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 08:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-28 12:56 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 14:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 18:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 23:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 09:33 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:43 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 19:31 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 05:40 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 01:29 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 17:17 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 22:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 20:13 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 22:43 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:52 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 18:59 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 19:47 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:12 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 06:52 +0200
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:45 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 05:37 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 23:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 21:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:48 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 07:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:19 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:48 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:59 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 19:02 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 12:22 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:28 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 22:03 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 19:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 01:04 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 07:09 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:17 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:17 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 23:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 11:21 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:06 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 18:29 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 18:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 06:59 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 16:38 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 18:40 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 09:00 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:09 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:47 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 16:35 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 00:01 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 21:05 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 22:11 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 21:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:11 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 22:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah + s ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah + s ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:27 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah + s ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:46 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:44 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:45 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-08-17 18:42 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:05 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 03:00 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 06:36 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@rec.arts.books.chronic.constipation> - 2015-08-18 11:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:01 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (temper) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 11:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (temper) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:30 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (temper) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (temper) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:51 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:30 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 11:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:57 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 07:36 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 15:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 14:05 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 19:36 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 17:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-15 16:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:29 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:46 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:12 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:47 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 12:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:30 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:46 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:40 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:26 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:24 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 08:24 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 17:14 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:43 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:36 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:24 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:50 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:22 +0100
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:39 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 23:03 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 06:17 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 23:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:42 +0200
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:40 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 17:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 17:27 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 17:52 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 18:05 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:46 -0500
NOMINATION: Kook of the Month Re: Nuke Em "Pacesetter" <pace@setter.boss> - 2015-08-13 10:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 08:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 10:27 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 12:53 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 13:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 06:06 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 19:12 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:21 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:29 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 00:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 23:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 00:44 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 22:53 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 04:53 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@rec.humour.funny.why.breathing.is.good.for.you> - 2015-08-16 03:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 06:40 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Quukur the inventive lizard-quaverer" <bat-fowling.credulous.fool@flapping.bacilliform.hasty.flirt-gill> - 2015-08-15 13:00 +0800
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 18:47 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Netjershema IV" <scorched.beaver@ripe.mommy.button> - 2015-08-16 23:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:16 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@soc.religion.prostatitis.worried.dude> - 2015-08-17 03:02 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:42 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 18:18 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Sekhemamun II Ankhet" <enfeebled.shutters.of.love@bulging.hairy.cherry> - 2015-08-16 23:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:16 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 19:40 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 06:03 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 10:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 17:01 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-17 05:46 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 22:32 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 20:01 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:24 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:29 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-08-14 17:01 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:29 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-15 09:21 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-15 18:43 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:18 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 07:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 17:06 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-16 12:08 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 07:50 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:39 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-13 18:46 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:16 -0500
PING > FNVW "Amun-erisy-merwyitu" <droopy.bizzle@strong.muffy> - 2015-08-16 01:33 +0000
Re: PING > FNVW "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:43 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 16:02 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-13 19:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:33 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:12 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Mitchell Holman <noemail@att.net> - 2015-08-14 15:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Mitchell Holman <noemail@att.net> - 2015-08-14 20:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 08:07 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 10:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 04:59 +0200
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-13 22:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-14 18:33 -0700
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 02:53 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-13 09:32 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 10:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 06:45 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 10:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:35 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:21 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) second try "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) second try "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:26 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:59 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:33 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:32 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 08:17 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 17:14 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 00:01 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:52 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:25 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 06:54 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-12 15:48 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 10:58 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:35 -0500
2 Jeanne Douglas (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 08:48 -0500
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:53 +0000
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 12:23 -0700
Proving Hägar is a sack of shit (was: 2 Jeanne Douglas) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:01 -0500
Re: Proving H?gar is a sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 20:18 +0000
Re: Proving Hägar is a sack of shit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
Re: Proving H㦡r is a sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 02:16 +0200
Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:13 -0500
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 03:52 +0200
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:20 -0500
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:36 +0000
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 06:14 +0200
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:22 -0500
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 06:59 -0700
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:30 -0500
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 08:17 -0700
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 10:26 -0500
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 15:18 -0400
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:21 +0000
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 20:02 +0200
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 14:30 -0400
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 04:51 +0200
Re: Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:20 +0000
Re: Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:49 -0500
Re: Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 06:12 +0000
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 20:28 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Jim Noles <no_e-mails@nosuchserver.com> - 2015-08-23 17:28 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-08-09 17:57 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 20:55 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 00:54 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 08:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 13:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:17 +0000
? 4 Jim (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:25 -0500
Re: ? 4 Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 22:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 20:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 03:19 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 06:32 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 13:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:21 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 23:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:40 -0500
? 4 jim (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:14 -0500
Re: ? 4 jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 22:43 +0000
Re: ? 4 jim "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:42 -0500
Re: ? 4 jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:16 +0000
Re: ? 4 jim "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:01 -0500
Re: ? 4 jim "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:25 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 14:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:36 +0000
Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:53 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 23:21 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:46 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:17 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 20:37 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 01:52 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:09 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 02:43 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-08-09 18:13 -0700
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:37 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners (was: Nuke Em) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-10 10:49 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 10:27 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-11 14:45 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 14:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-12 16:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 00:39 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 07:49 -0400
Re: Nuke Em BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-09 10:11 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 10:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:31 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 14:17 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 02:44 +0000
Re: Nuke Em edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-08-09 18:07 -0700
Re: Nuke Em edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-08-09 17:42 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 20:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-09 16:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 01:41 -0400
Re: Nuke Em BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-10 11:06 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 10:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:19 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 02:44 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 23:26 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 05:49 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:39 -0500
2nd ? for jim (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:21 -0500
Re: 2nd ? for jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 23:00 +0000
Re: 2nd ? for jim (was: Nuke Em) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:32 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-09 16:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 23:25 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 08:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:44 -0500
Page 5 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 50 Next page →
| From | dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 10:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5726e94f-880c-4919-8045-b967b3eef754@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #263246 |
On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 11:02:40 AM UTC-5, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 8/12/2015 10:14 AM, Rocky wrote: > > Because if they news media had been honest the dictionaries would not have > > had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for their bullshit. DUH. > > > > Rocky > > I've not killed this thread in my reader only because certain examples > of insanity are interesting. > > I'm curious what other people think about how a person descends into > conspiracy-theory nuttery. I know paranoia is a common mental disorder, > but how does this develop? How does it translate into fear of the > government and certainty of suppression of hidden facts? > > Is there some developmental trauma where a young person's trust is > betrayed, and this leads to being guarded and suspicious in later > relationships? Does the person begin to second-guess everyone's motives? > Does the distancing from others lead to greater trouble managing > personal affairs, and then the person has to find someone or something > to blame for that? > > > -- > Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables I have actually speculated on some of this a number of times. A couple of the examples in alt.conspiracy seem to be classic paranoid schizophrenic cases (like MI5 guy). Ignoring those, I suspect many of the others suffer from an incredible feeling of lack of significance. The fun part of inventing a Horrible Conspiracy(tm), is that the inventor suddenly becomes "significant". They, and only they, are in the know. The inventor is "the only one who can save us". Clearly they are the object of intense scrutiny by "those in power", making them all the more significant. I'm sure the origins of the feelings of lack of significance are probably complex and deep rooted, but I can speculate that these individuals have always been some kind of outsider. Whether because of childhood circumstances, or some minor mental/emotional issue, I would guess most of the conspiracy theory camp have suffered from a lack of interpersonal relationships. Not fitting in, may drive them to relatively solo occupations (e.g. Truck Driving). While solo occupations might have been more comfortable, they inevitably led to further isolation. Loneliness and isolation might cause these individuals to seek human contact via inappropriate means (e.g. obsessive interest, stalking, etc.). The rebuff of the inappropriate relationships only further drives our subjects down the spiral that eventually leads them to the point where subconscious desperation results in the invention of conspiracies. Interestingly enough, not only does the conspiracy justify our subject's significance, but it also give an external reason for their isolation. (I can't trust anyone. They are attacking me. They drive others away to isolate me.) The magic of the Internet now gives our subject people to interact with. He has Followers(tm), Allies(tm), and even Enemies(tm). I find it interesting that our subject's worldview no longer has room for people who simply disagree with them. No, anyone who actively disagrees (clearly!) must be working for the conspiracy, and anyone who passively disagrees must be an unwitting dupe (Sheeple!). Please remember that my opinions are worth no more than you paid for them. Also, I am not a psychiatrist; I only play one on TV. Dan (Woj...)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 11:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <FP-dnQrXnY7r91LInZ2dnUU7-SednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #263253 |
"dmaster" <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:5726e94f-880c-4919-8045-b967b3eef754@googlegroups.com... On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 11:02:40 AM UTC-5, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 8/12/2015 10:14 AM, Rocky wrote: > > Because if they news media had been honest the dictionaries would not > > have > > had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for their bullshit. > > DUH. > > > > Rocky > > I've not killed this thread in my reader only because certain examples > of insanity are interesting. > > I'm curious what other people think about how a person descends into > conspiracy-theory nuttery. I know paranoia is a common mental disorder, > but how does this develop? How does it translate into fear of the > government and certainty of suppression of hidden facts? > > Is there some developmental trauma where a young person's trust is > betrayed, and this leads to being guarded and suspicious in later > relationships? Does the person begin to second-guess everyone's motives? > Does the distancing from others lead to greater trouble managing > personal affairs, and then the person has to find someone or something > to blame for that? > > > -- > Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables I have actually speculated on some of this a number of times. A couple of the examples in alt.conspiracy seem to be classic paranoid schizophrenic cases (like MI5 guy). Ignoring those, I suspect many of the others suffer from an incredible feeling of lack of significance. The fun part of inventing a Horrible Conspiracy(tm), is that the inventor suddenly becomes "significant". They, and only they, are in the know. The inventor is "the only one who can save us". Clearly they are the object of intense scrutiny by "those in power", making them all the more significant. I'm sure the origins of the feelings of lack of significance are probably complex and deep rooted, but I can speculate that these individuals have always been some kind of outsider. Whether because of childhood circumstances, or some minor mental/emotional issue, I would guess most of the conspiracy theory camp have suffered from a lack of interpersonal relationships. Not fitting in, may drive them to relatively solo occupations (e.g. Truck Driving). While solo occupations might have been more comfortable, they inevitably led to further isolation. Loneliness and isolation might cause these individuals to seek human contact via inappropriate means (e.g. obsessive interest, stalking, etc.). The rebuff of the inappropriate relationships only further drives our subjects down the spiral that eventually leads them to the point where subconscious desperation results in the invention of conspiracies. Interestingly enough, not only does the conspiracy justify our subject's significance, but it also give an external reason for their isolation. (I can't trust anyone. They are attacking me. They drive others away to isolate me.) The magic of the Internet now gives our subject people to interact with. He has Followers(tm), Allies(tm), and even Enemies(tm). I find it interesting that our subject's worldview no longer has room for people who simply disagree with them. No, anyone who actively disagrees (clearly!) must be working for the conspiracy, and anyone who passively disagrees must be an unwitting dupe (Sheeple!). Please remember that my opinions are worth no more than you paid for them. Also, I am not a psychiatrist; I only play one on TV. Dan (Woj...) ------------------------ Opinions? All I remember about you is you lie a lot. But I'm glad you had a link to where you got that photo with the debris pile from WTC7 behind it. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <89rnsa9abs15qvqgrd5ohtaa6rpo9urhgb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #263246 |
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:02:37 -0500, Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On 8/12/2015 10:14 AM, Rocky wrote:
>> Because if they news media had been honest the dictionaries would not have
>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for their bullshit. DUH.
>>
>> Rocky
>
>I've not killed this thread in my reader only because certain examples
>of insanity are interesting.
>
>I'm curious what other people think about how a person descends into
>conspiracy-theory nuttery. I know paranoia is a common mental disorder,
A patient doesn't need to be paranoid to believe a conspiracy
theory. Although it would help.
>but how does this develop? How does it translate into fear of the
>government and certainty of suppression of hidden facts?
>
In Rocky's case, it's his low intellect and learning disability.
Put quite honestly, he has a very difficult time learning. This means
he latches onto the simplest of concepts and accepts them as
undeniable truths. Getting him to understand where he is in error is,
at best, extremely difficult.
>Is there some developmental trauma where a young person's trust is
>betrayed, and this leads to being guarded and suspicious in later
>relationships?
This can happen, though typically it results in an inability to
trust other people. I'm not aware of such trauma resulting in
delusional beliefs like Rocky expresses.
>Does the person begin to second-guess everyone's motives?
>Does the distancing from others lead to greater trouble managing
>personal affairs, and then the person has to find someone or something
>to blame for that?
This can happen, but it's not the case with Rocky. He doesn't
blame any person problems he may have on phantom nukes.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 11:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #263241 |
In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, wookiee@att.net says... > > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... > > Rocky wrote: > >> usenet.kooks removed > >> > >> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" > >> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message > >> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... > >>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message > >>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: > >>> > >>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message > >>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... > >>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, > >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove that two 110 > >>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and Surviving > >>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave Survivors in > >>>>>>>>> Stairwell > >>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just happened to be > >>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be > >>>>>>>> capitalized, > >>>>>>>> lunatic boi? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be > >>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required specially > >>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You really are quite insane. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? How do you > >>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of radioactivity? > >>>> > >>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also tell you it > >>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they did after the > >>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full of what > >>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the hypocenters. Those poor > >>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they bargained for. > >>> > >>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. > >> > >> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was a great > >> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media to reality. > >> > >> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can not be > >> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the media wants you > >> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris piles than a > >> "Controlled > >> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear Controlled > >> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the height of the > >> Surviving > >> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate exactly where the > >> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest walls will be > >> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin Towers neither of > >> the underground nukes > >> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height of the > >> surviving walls and height of the surviving corners places the deep > >> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. > >> > >> Rocky > > > > > > what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up > > Because if they news media had been honest the dictionaries would not have > had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for their bullshit. DUH. > > Rocky "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the epicenter of an event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, it's not necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. HTH -- Checkmate Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 16:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #263258 |
"Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message
news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com...
> In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> wookiee@att.net says...
>
>
>>
>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net...
>> > Rocky wrote:
>> >> usenet.kooks removed
>> >>
>> >> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid"
>> >> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net...
>> >>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message
>> >>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>:
>> >>>
>> >>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>> >>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com...
>> >>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>,
>> >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>> >>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove that two 110
>> >>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and Surviving
>> >>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave Survivors in
>> >>>>>>>>> Stairwell
>> >>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just happened to be
>> >>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be
>> >>>>>>>> capitalized,
>> >>>>>>>> lunatic boi?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be
>> >>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required specially
>> >>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> You really are quite insane.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? How do you
>> >>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of radioactivity?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also tell you it
>> >>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they did after the
>> >>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full of what
>> >>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the hypocenters. Those poor
>> >>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they bargained for.
>> >>>
>> >>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k.
>> >>
>> >> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was a great
>> >> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media to reality.
>> >>
>> >> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can not be
>> >> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the media wants you
>> >> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris piles than a
>> >> "Controlled
>> >> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear Controlled
>> >> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the height of the
>> >> Surviving
>> >> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate exactly where the
>> >> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest walls will be
>> >> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin Towers neither
>> >> of
>> >> the underground nukes
>> >> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height of the
>> >> surviving walls and height of the surviving corners places the deep
>> >> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4.
>> >>
>> >> Rocky
>> >
>> >
>> > what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up
>>
>> Because if they news media had been honest the dictionaries would not
>> have
>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for their bullshit.
>> DUH.
>>
>> Rocky
>
> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the epicenter of an
> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, it's not
> necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. HTH
Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before 9/11/01. <G>
Here, this will help:
Radiological Cleanup on ground zero -
This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 14:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #263266 |
In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, wookiee@att.net says... > > "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... > > In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > > wookiee@att.net says... > > > > > >> > >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > >> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... > >> > Rocky wrote: > >> >> usenet.kooks removed > >> >> > >> >> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" > >> >> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message > >> >> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... > >> >>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message > >> >>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: > >> >>> > >> >>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message > >> >>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... > >> >>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, > >> >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > >> >>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > >> >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove that two 110 > >> >>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and Surviving > >> >>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave Survivors in > >> >>>>>>>>> Stairwell > >> >>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just happened to be > >> >>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be > >> >>>>>>>> capitalized, > >> >>>>>>>> lunatic boi? > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be > >> >>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required specially > >> >>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> You really are quite insane. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? How do you > >> >>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of radioactivity? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also tell you it > >> >>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they did after the > >> >>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full of what > >> >>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the hypocenters. Those poor > >> >>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they bargained for. > >> >>> > >> >>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. > >> >> > >> >> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was a great > >> >> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media to reality. > >> >> > >> >> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can not be > >> >> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the media wants you > >> >> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris piles than a > >> >> "Controlled > >> >> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear Controlled > >> >> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the height of the > >> >> Surviving > >> >> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate exactly where the > >> >> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest walls will be > >> >> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin Towers neither > >> >> of > >> >> the underground nukes > >> >> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height of the > >> >> surviving walls and height of the surviving corners places the deep > >> >> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. > >> >> > >> >> Rocky > >> > > >> > > >> > what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up > >> > >> Because if they news media had been honest the dictionaries would not > >> have > >> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for their bullshit. > >> DUH. > >> > >> Rocky > > > > "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the epicenter of an > > event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, it's not > > necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. HTH > > Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before 9/11/01. <G> > > Here, this will help: > > Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - > This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY What has that got to do with my statement? -- Checkmate Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 16:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #263270 |
"Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... > In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, > wookiee@att.net says... > > >> >> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... >> > In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> > wookiee@att.net says... >> > >> > >> >> >> >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... >> >> > Rocky wrote: >> >> >> usenet.kooks removed >> >> >> >> >> >> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" >> >> >> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... >> >> >>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >> >> >>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... >> >> >>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >> >> >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> >> >>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> >> >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove that two >> >> >>>>>>>>> 110 >> >> >>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and Surviving >> >> >>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave Survivors >> >> >>>>>>>>> in >> >> >>>>>>>>> Stairwell >> >> >>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just happened to >> >> >>>>>>>>> be >> >> >>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be >> >> >>>>>>>> capitalized, >> >> >>>>>>>> lunatic boi? >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be >> >> >>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required specially >> >> >>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> You really are quite insane. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? How do you >> >> >>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of radioactivity? >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also tell you it >> >> >>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they did after >> >> >>>> the >> >> >>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full of what >> >> >>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the hypocenters. Those >> >> >>>> poor >> >> >>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they bargained >> >> >>>> for. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. >> >> >> >> >> >> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was a great >> >> >> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media to reality. >> >> >> >> >> >> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can not be >> >> >> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the media wants >> >> >> you >> >> >> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris piles than a >> >> >> "Controlled >> >> >> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear Controlled >> >> >> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the height of the >> >> >> Surviving >> >> >> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate exactly where >> >> >> the >> >> >> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest walls will be >> >> >> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin Towers >> >> >> neither >> >> >> of >> >> >> the underground nukes >> >> >> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height of the >> >> >> surviving walls and height of the surviving corners places the deep >> >> >> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. >> >> >> >> >> >> Rocky >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up >> >> >> >> Because if they news media had been honest the dictionaries would not >> >> have >> >> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for their bullshit. >> >> DUH. >> >> >> >> Rocky >> > >> > "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the epicenter of an >> > event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, it's not >> > necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. HTH >> >> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before 9/11/01. <G> >> >> Here, this will help: >> >> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - >> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY > > What has that got to do with my statement? It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and over and over and you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the following part of it: https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s Rocky.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 14:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #263272 |
In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, wookiee@att.net says... > > "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... > > In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, > > wookiee@att.net says... > > > > > >> > >> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... > >> > In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >> > wookiee@att.net says... > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > >> >> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... > >> >> > Rocky wrote: > >> >> >> usenet.kooks removed > >> >> >> > >> >> >> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" > >> >> >> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... > >> >> >>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message > >> >> >>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... > >> >> >>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, > >> >> >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > >> >> >>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > >> >> >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove that two > >> >> >>>>>>>>> 110 > >> >> >>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and Surviving > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave Survivors > >> >> >>>>>>>>> in > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Stairwell > >> >> >>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just happened to > >> >> >>>>>>>>> be > >> >> >>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be > >> >> >>>>>>>> capitalized, > >> >> >>>>>>>> lunatic boi? > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be > >> >> >>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required specially > >> >> >>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> You really are quite insane. > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? How do you > >> >> >>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of radioactivity? > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also tell you it > >> >> >>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they did after > >> >> >>>> the > >> >> >>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full of what > >> >> >>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the hypocenters. Those > >> >> >>>> poor > >> >> >>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they bargained > >> >> >>>> for. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was a great > >> >> >> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media to reality. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can not be > >> >> >> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the media wants > >> >> >> you > >> >> >> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris piles than a > >> >> >> "Controlled > >> >> >> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear Controlled > >> >> >> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the height of the > >> >> >> Surviving > >> >> >> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate exactly where > >> >> >> the > >> >> >> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest walls will be > >> >> >> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin Towers > >> >> >> neither > >> >> >> of > >> >> >> the underground nukes > >> >> >> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height of the > >> >> >> surviving walls and height of the surviving corners places the deep > >> >> >> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Rocky > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up > >> >> > >> >> Because if they news media had been honest the dictionaries would not > >> >> have > >> >> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for their bullshit. > >> >> DUH. > >> >> > >> >> Rocky > >> > > >> > "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the epicenter of an > >> > event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, it's not > >> > necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. HTH > >> > >> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before 9/11/01. <G> > >> > >> Here, this will help: > >> > >> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - > >> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY > > > > What has that got to do with my statement? > > It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and over and over and > you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the following part > of it: > https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s > > Rocky. That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. -- Checkmate Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 17:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #263273 |
"Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... > In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > wookiee@att.net says... > > >> >> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... >> > In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> > wookiee@att.net says... >> > >> > >> >> >> >> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> >> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... >> >> > In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> >> > wookiee@att.net says... >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... >> >> >> > Rocky wrote: >> >> >> >> usenet.kooks removed >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" >> >> >> >> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... >> >> >> >>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >> >> >> >>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... >> >> >> >>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >> >> >> >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> >> >> >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove that >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> two >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> 110 >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and Surviving >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Survivors >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> in >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Stairwell >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just happened >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> to >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> be >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not >> >> >> >>>>>>>> be >> >> >> >>>>>>>> capitalized, >> >> >> >>>>>>>> lunatic boi? >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be >> >> >> >>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required >> >> >> >>>>>>> specially >> >> >> >>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> You really are quite insane. >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? How do >> >> >> >>>>> you >> >> >> >>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of >> >> >> >>>>> radioactivity? >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also tell you >> >> >> >>>> it >> >> >> >>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they did >> >> >> >>>> after >> >> >> >>>> the >> >> >> >>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full of what >> >> >> >>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the hypocenters. Those >> >> >> >>>> poor >> >> >> >>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they bargained >> >> >> >>>> for. >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was a >> >> >> >> great >> >> >> >> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media to >> >> >> >> reality. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can not be >> >> >> >> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the media wants >> >> >> >> you >> >> >> >> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris piles than >> >> >> >> a >> >> >> >> "Controlled >> >> >> >> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear Controlled >> >> >> >> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the height of >> >> >> >> the >> >> >> >> Surviving >> >> >> >> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate exactly >> >> >> >> where >> >> >> >> the >> >> >> >> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest walls will >> >> >> >> be >> >> >> >> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin Towers >> >> >> >> neither >> >> >> >> of >> >> >> >> the underground nukes >> >> >> >> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height of the >> >> >> >> surviving walls and height of the surviving corners places the >> >> >> >> deep >> >> >> >> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Rocky >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up >> >> >> >> >> >> Because if they news media had been honest the dictionaries would >> >> >> not >> >> >> have >> >> >> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for their >> >> >> bullshit. >> >> >> DUH. >> >> >> >> >> >> Rocky >> >> > >> >> > "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the epicenter of an >> >> > event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, it's not >> >> > necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. HTH >> >> >> >> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before 9/11/01. >> >> <G> >> >> >> >> Here, this will help: >> >> >> >> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - >> >> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY >> > >> > What has that got to do with my statement? >> >> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and over and over >> and >> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the following >> part >> of it: >> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s >> >> Rocky. > > That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero" and not the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." Again from above: 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero"' Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used to level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" could have been used instead of changing that definition after the Great 9/11 hoax. OK? Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 15:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #263278 |
In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, wookiee@att.net says... > > "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... > > In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > > wookiee@att.net says... > > > > > >> > >> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... > >> > In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >> > wookiee@att.net says... > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >> >> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... > >> >> > In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >> >> > wookiee@att.net says... > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... > >> >> >> > Rocky wrote: > >> >> >> >> usenet.kooks removed > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" > >> >> >> >> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... > >> >> >> >>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message > >> >> >> >>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> >>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... > >> >> >> >>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, > >> >> >> >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> >>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove that > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> two > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> 110 > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and Surviving > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Survivors > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> in > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Stairwell > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just happened > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> to > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> be > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> be > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> capitalized, > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> lunatic boi? > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be > >> >> >> >>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required > >> >> >> >>>>>>> specially > >> >> >> >>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>> You really are quite insane. > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? How do > >> >> >> >>>>> you > >> >> >> >>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of > >> >> >> >>>>> radioactivity? > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also tell you > >> >> >> >>>> it > >> >> >> >>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they did > >> >> >> >>>> after > >> >> >> >>>> the > >> >> >> >>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full of what > >> >> >> >>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the hypocenters. Those > >> >> >> >>>> poor > >> >> >> >>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they bargained > >> >> >> >>>> for. > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was a > >> >> >> >> great > >> >> >> >> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media to > >> >> >> >> reality. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can not be > >> >> >> >> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the media wants > >> >> >> >> you > >> >> >> >> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris piles than > >> >> >> >> a > >> >> >> >> "Controlled > >> >> >> >> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear Controlled > >> >> >> >> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the height of > >> >> >> >> the > >> >> >> >> Surviving > >> >> >> >> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate exactly > >> >> >> >> where > >> >> >> >> the > >> >> >> >> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest walls will > >> >> >> >> be > >> >> >> >> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin Towers > >> >> >> >> neither > >> >> >> >> of > >> >> >> >> the underground nukes > >> >> >> >> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height of the > >> >> >> >> surviving walls and height of the surviving corners places the > >> >> >> >> deep > >> >> >> >> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Rocky > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Because if they news media had been honest the dictionaries would > >> >> >> not > >> >> >> have > >> >> >> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for their > >> >> >> bullshit. > >> >> >> DUH. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Rocky > >> >> > > >> >> > "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the epicenter of an > >> >> > event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, it's not > >> >> > necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. HTH > >> >> > >> >> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before 9/11/01. > >> >> <G> > >> >> > >> >> Here, this will help: > >> >> > >> >> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - > >> >> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov > >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY > >> > > >> > What has that got to do with my statement? > >> > >> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and over and over > >> and > >> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the following > >> part > >> of it: > >> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s > >> > >> Rocky. > > > > That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. > > All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero" and not > the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." > > Again from above: > 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero"' > > Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used to level the > Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" could have been used > instead of changing that definition after the Great 9/11 hoax. OK? > > Rocky Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" get planted deep underground... below the WTC... without anybody knowing? Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the towers a mass hallucination? -- Checkmate Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 20:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.x296z1bbtm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #263281 |
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 18:52:56 -0400, Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote: > In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > wookiee@att.net says... > > >> >> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... >> > In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> > wookiee@att.net says... >> > >> > >> >> >> >> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> >> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... >> >> > In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> >> > wookiee@att.net says... >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> >> >> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... >> >> >> > In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> >> >> > wookiee@att.net says... >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... >> >> >> >> > Rocky wrote: >> >> >> >> >> usenet.kooks removed >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" >> >> >> >> >> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> >> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... >> >> >> >> >>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >> >> >> >> >>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in >> message >> >> >> >> >>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... >> >> >> >> >>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >> >> >> >> >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove >> that >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> two >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> 110 >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and >> Surviving >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Survivors >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> in >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Stairwell >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just >> happened >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> to >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> be >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should >> not >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> be >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> capitalized, >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> lunatic boi? >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should >> not be >> >> >> >> >>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> specially >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> You really are quite insane. >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? >> How do >> >> >> >> >>>>> you >> >> >> >> >>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of >> >> >> >> >>>>> radioactivity? >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also >> tell you >> >> >> >> >>>> it >> >> >> >> >>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they did >> >> >> >> >>>> after >> >> >> >> >>>> the >> >> >> >> >>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full of >> what >> >> >> >> >>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the hypocenters. >> Those >> >> >> >> >>>> poor >> >> >> >> >>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they >> bargained >> >> >> >> >>>> for. >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was >> a >> >> >> >> >> great >> >> >> >> >> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media to >> >> >> >> >> reality. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can not >> be >> >> >> >> >> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the media >> wants >> >> >> >> >> you >> >> >> >> >> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris piles >> than >> >> >> >> >> a >> >> >> >> >> "Controlled >> >> >> >> >> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear >> Controlled >> >> >> >> >> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the >> height of >> >> >> >> >> the >> >> >> >> >> Surviving >> >> >> >> >> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate exactly >> >> >> >> >> where >> >> >> >> >> the >> >> >> >> >> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest walls >> will >> >> >> >> >> be >> >> >> >> >> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin >> Towers >> >> >> >> >> neither >> >> >> >> >> of >> >> >> >> >> the underground nukes >> >> >> >> >> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height of >> the >> >> >> >> >> surviving walls and height of the surviving corners places >> the >> >> >> >> >> deep >> >> >> >> >> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Rocky >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Because if they news media had been honest the dictionaries >> would >> >> >> >> not >> >> >> >> have >> >> >> >> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for their >> >> >> >> bullshit. >> >> >> >> DUH. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Rocky >> >> >> > >> >> >> > "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the epicenter >> of an >> >> >> > event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, it's not >> >> >> > necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. HTH >> >> >> >> >> >> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before >> 9/11/01. >> >> >> <G> >> >> >> >> >> >> Here, this will help: >> >> >> >> >> >> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - >> >> >> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov >> >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY >> >> > >> >> > What has that got to do with my statement? >> >> >> >> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and over and >> over >> >> and >> >> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the following >> >> part >> >> of it: >> >> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s >> >> >> >> Rocky. >> > >> > That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. >> >> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero" and >> not >> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." >> >> Again from above: >> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase "Ground >> Zero"' >> >> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used to level >> the >> Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" could have been >> used >> instead of changing that definition after the Great 9/11 hoax. OK? >> >> Rocky > > Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" get > planted deep underground... below the WTC... without anybody knowing? > Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the towers a > mass hallucination? > don't you know? the government is absolutely just "horrible" at everything except keeping secrets, at which they excel. -- http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 09:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <3bGdnZ7wq5xjNVHInZ2dnUU7-WmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #263281 |
"Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... > In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > wookiee@att.net says... > > >> >> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... >> > In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> > wookiee@att.net says... >> > >> > >> >> >> >> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> >> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... >> >> > In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> >> > wookiee@att.net says... >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> >> >> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... >> >> >> > In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> >> >> > wookiee@att.net says... >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... >> >> >> >> > Rocky wrote: >> >> >> >> >> usenet.kooks removed >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" >> >> >> >> >> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> >> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... >> >> >> >> >>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >> >> >> >> >>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in >> >> >> >> >>>> message >> >> >> >> >>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... >> >> >> >> >>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >> >> >> >> >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove that >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> two >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> 110 >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Surviving >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Survivors >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> in >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Stairwell >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> happened >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> to >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> be >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> not >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> be >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> capitalized, >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> lunatic boi? >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not >> >> >> >> >>>>>> be >> >> >> >> >>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> specially >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> You really are quite insane. >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? How >> >> >> >> >>>>> do >> >> >> >> >>>>> you >> >> >> >> >>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of >> >> >> >> >>>>> radioactivity? >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also tell >> >> >> >> >>>> you >> >> >> >> >>>> it >> >> >> >> >>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they did >> >> >> >> >>>> after >> >> >> >> >>>> the >> >> >> >> >>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full of >> >> >> >> >>>> what >> >> >> >> >>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the hypocenters. >> >> >> >> >>>> Those >> >> >> >> >>>> poor >> >> >> >> >>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they >> >> >> >> >>>> bargained >> >> >> >> >>>> for. >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was a >> >> >> >> >> great >> >> >> >> >> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media to >> >> >> >> >> reality. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can not >> >> >> >> >> be >> >> >> >> >> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the media >> >> >> >> >> wants >> >> >> >> >> you >> >> >> >> >> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris piles >> >> >> >> >> than >> >> >> >> >> a >> >> >> >> >> "Controlled >> >> >> >> >> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear >> >> >> >> >> Controlled >> >> >> >> >> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the height >> >> >> >> >> of >> >> >> >> >> the >> >> >> >> >> Surviving >> >> >> >> >> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate exactly >> >> >> >> >> where >> >> >> >> >> the >> >> >> >> >> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest walls >> >> >> >> >> will >> >> >> >> >> be >> >> >> >> >> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin Towers >> >> >> >> >> neither >> >> >> >> >> of >> >> >> >> >> the underground nukes >> >> >> >> >> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height of the >> >> >> >> >> surviving walls and height of the surviving corners places >> >> >> >> >> the >> >> >> >> >> deep >> >> >> >> >> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Rocky >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Because if they news media had been honest the dictionaries >> >> >> >> would >> >> >> >> not >> >> >> >> have >> >> >> >> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for their >> >> >> >> bullshit. >> >> >> >> DUH. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Rocky >> >> >> > >> >> >> > "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the epicenter of >> >> >> > an >> >> >> > event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, it's not >> >> >> > necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. HTH >> >> >> >> >> >> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before >> >> >> 9/11/01. >> >> >> <G> >> >> >> >> >> >> Here, this will help: >> >> >> >> >> >> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - >> >> >> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov >> >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY >> >> > >> >> > What has that got to do with my statement? >> >> >> >> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and over and >> >> over >> >> and >> >> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the following >> >> part >> >> of it: >> >> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s >> >> >> >> Rocky. >> > >> > That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. >> >> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero" and >> not >> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." >> >> Again from above: >> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase "Ground >> Zero"' >> >> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used to level the >> Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" could have been used >> instead of changing that definition after the Great 9/11 hoax. OK? >> >> Rocky > > Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" get > planted deep underground... below the WTC... without anybody knowing? They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And rumor has it that was part of the reason it took so long to built the replacement for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a nuke too. > Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the towers a > mass hallucination? You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if it hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. Here, dig this video and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to make a CGI slide right into the South Tower.: https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real world can be found here: https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a lot of videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can easily be recreated by 3D software and if they leave the default setting where the wings reflect the sky. I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the above video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on 9/11/01 but it took be a little bit longer before I could accept the fact the Twin Towers were nuked. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 07:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8mevdh.i7l.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #263322 |
Rocky wrote: > "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... >> In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> wookiee@att.net says... >> >> >>> >>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... >>>> In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... >>>>>> In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>> In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> usenet.kooks removed >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" >>>>>>>>>>> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 110 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Survivors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stairwell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specially >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are quite insane. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? How >>>>>>>>>>>>>> do >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactivity? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also tell >>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they did >>>>>>>>>>>>> after >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full of >>>>>>>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the hypocenters. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Those >>>>>>>>>>>>> poor >>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they >>>>>>>>>>>>> bargained >>>>>>>>>>>>> for. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was >>>>>>>>>>> a great >>>>>>>>>>> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media to >>>>>>>>>>> reality. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can not >>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the media >>>>>>>>>>> wants >>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris piles >>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>> "Controlled >>>>>>>>>>> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear >>>>>>>>>>> Controlled >>>>>>>>>>> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the height >>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate exactly >>>>>>>>>>> where >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest walls >>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin >>>>>>>>>>> Towers neither >>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>> the underground nukes >>>>>>>>>>> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height of >>>>>>>>>>> the surviving walls and height of the surviving corners >>>>>>>>>>> places the >>>>>>>>>>> deep >>>>>>>>>>> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Because if they news media had been honest the dictionaries >>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for their >>>>>>>>> bullshit. >>>>>>>>> DUH. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the epicenter >>>>>>>> of an >>>>>>>> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, it's >>>>>>>> not necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. HTH >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before >>>>>>> 9/11/01. >>>>>>> <G> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here, this will help: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - >>>>>>> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY >>>>>> >>>>>> What has that got to do with my statement? >>>>> >>>>> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and over >>>>> and over >>>>> and >>>>> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the >>>>> following part >>>>> of it: >>>>> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s >>>>> >>>>> Rocky. >>>> >>>> That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. >>> >>> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero" >>> and not >>> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." >>> >>> Again from above: >>> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase "Ground >>> Zero"' >>> >>> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used to >>> level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" could >>> have >>> been used instead of changing that definition after the Great 9/11 >>> hoax. OK? Rocky >> >> Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" get >> planted deep underground... below the WTC... without anybody knowing? > > They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And rumor has > it that was part of the reason it took so long to built the replacement > for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a nuke too. > > >> Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the towers a >> mass hallucination? > > You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if it > hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. Here, dig > this video > and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to make a CGI > slide right into the South Tower.: > https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s > > And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real world > can be found here: > https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s > > Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a lot of > videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw > > Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can easily be > recreated by 3D software and if they leave the default setting where > the wings reflect the sky. > > I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the above > video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on 9/11/01 but > it took be a little bit longer before I could accept the fact the > Twin Towers were nuked. > Rocky they weren't real buildings they were holograms
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 07:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30364bba1016051c98aba2@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #263323 |
In article <8mevdh.i7l.19.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > Rocky wrote: > > "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > > news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... > >> In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >> wookiee@att.net says... > >> > >> > >>> > >>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >>> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... > >>>> In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >>>> wookiee@att.net says... > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >>>>> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... > >>>>>> In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >>>>>>> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... > >>>>>>>> In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > >>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... > >>>>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> usenet.kooks removed > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" > >>>>>>>>>>> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... > >>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in > >>>>>>>>>>>>> message > >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that two > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 110 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Survivors > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stairwell > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lunatic boi? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specially > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are quite insane. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? How > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> do > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactivity? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also tell > >>>>>>>>>>>>> you > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they did > >>>>>>>>>>>>> after > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full of > >>>>>>>>>>>>> what > >>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the hypocenters. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Those > >>>>>>>>>>>>> poor > >>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they > >>>>>>>>>>>>> bargained > >>>>>>>>>>>>> for. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was > >>>>>>>>>>> a great > >>>>>>>>>>> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media to > >>>>>>>>>>> reality. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can not > >>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the media > >>>>>>>>>>> wants > >>>>>>>>>>> you > >>>>>>>>>>> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris piles > >>>>>>>>>>> than > >>>>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>>> "Controlled > >>>>>>>>>>> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear > >>>>>>>>>>> Controlled > >>>>>>>>>>> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the height > >>>>>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>> Surviving > >>>>>>>>>>> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate exactly > >>>>>>>>>>> where > >>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest walls > >>>>>>>>>>> will > >>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin > >>>>>>>>>>> Towers neither > >>>>>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>>> the underground nukes > >>>>>>>>>>> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height of > >>>>>>>>>>> the surviving walls and height of the surviving corners > >>>>>>>>>>> places the > >>>>>>>>>>> deep > >>>>>>>>>>> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Rocky > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Because if they news media had been honest the dictionaries > >>>>>>>>> would > >>>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>>> have > >>>>>>>>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for their > >>>>>>>>> bullshit. > >>>>>>>>> DUH. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Rocky > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the epicenter > >>>>>>>> of an > >>>>>>>> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, it's > >>>>>>>> not necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. HTH > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before > >>>>>>> 9/11/01. > >>>>>>> <G> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Here, this will help: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - > >>>>>>> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov > >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What has that got to do with my statement? > >>>>> > >>>>> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and over > >>>>> and over > >>>>> and > >>>>> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the > >>>>> following part > >>>>> of it: > >>>>> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s > >>>>> > >>>>> Rocky. > >>>> > >>>> That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. > >>> > >>> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero" > >>> and not > >>> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." > >>> > >>> Again from above: > >>> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase "Ground > >>> Zero"' > >>> > >>> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used to > >>> level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" could > >>> have > >>> been used instead of changing that definition after the Great 9/11 > >>> hoax. OK? Rocky > >> > >> Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" get > >> planted deep underground... below the WTC... without anybody knowing? > > > > They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And rumor has > > it that was part of the reason it took so long to built the replacement > > for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a nuke too. > > > > > >> Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the towers a > >> mass hallucination? > > > > You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if it > > hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. Here, dig > > this video > > and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to make a CGI > > slide right into the South Tower.: > > https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s > > > > And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real world > > can be found here: > > https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s > > > > Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a lot of > > videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw > > > > Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can easily be > > recreated by 3D software and if they leave the default setting where > > the wings reflect the sky. > > > > I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the above > > video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on 9/11/01 but > > it took be a little bit longer before I could accept the fact the > > Twin Towers were nuked. > > Rocky > > they weren't real buildings they were holograms ...in a parallel universe. -- Checkmate Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 16:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <CbqdnZi-9PdDmFDInZ2dnUU7-c2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #263326 |
"Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message news:MPG.30364bba1016051c98aba2@news.altopia.com... > In article <8mevdh.i7l.19.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > >> >> Rocky wrote: >> > "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> > news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... >> >> In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> >> wookiee@att.net says... >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> >>> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... >> >>>> In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> >>>> wookiee@att.net says... >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> >>>>> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... >> >>>>>> In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> >>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> >>>>>>> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... >> >>>>>>>> In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> >>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >>>>>>>>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... >> >>>>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>> usenet.kooks removed >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" >> >>>>>>>>>>> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >>>>>>>>>>> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> message >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that two >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 110 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Survivors >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stairwell >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lunatic boi? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specially >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are quite insane. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? How >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> do >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactivity? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also tell >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> you >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> it >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they did >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> after >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full of >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> what >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the hypocenters. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Those >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> poor >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> bargained >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> for. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was >> >>>>>>>>>>> a great >> >>>>>>>>>>> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media to >> >>>>>>>>>>> reality. >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can not >> >>>>>>>>>>> be >> >>>>>>>>>>> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the media >> >>>>>>>>>>> wants >> >>>>>>>>>>> you >> >>>>>>>>>>> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris piles >> >>>>>>>>>>> than >> >>>>>>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>>>>>> "Controlled >> >>>>>>>>>>> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear >> >>>>>>>>>>> Controlled >> >>>>>>>>>>> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the height >> >>>>>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >> >>>>>>>>>>> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate exactly >> >>>>>>>>>>> where >> >>>>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>>> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest walls >> >>>>>>>>>>> will >> >>>>>>>>>>> be >> >>>>>>>>>>> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin >> >>>>>>>>>>> Towers neither >> >>>>>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>>>>> the underground nukes >> >>>>>>>>>>> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height of >> >>>>>>>>>>> the surviving walls and height of the surviving corners >> >>>>>>>>>>> places the >> >>>>>>>>>>> deep >> >>>>>>>>>>> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Because if they news media had been honest the dictionaries >> >>>>>>>>> would >> >>>>>>>>> not >> >>>>>>>>> have >> >>>>>>>>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for their >> >>>>>>>>> bullshit. >> >>>>>>>>> DUH. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Rocky >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the epicenter >> >>>>>>>> of an >> >>>>>>>> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, it's >> >>>>>>>> not necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. HTH >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before >> >>>>>>> 9/11/01. >> >>>>>>> <G> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Here, this will help: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - >> >>>>>>> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov >> >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> What has that got to do with my statement? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and over >> >>>>> and over >> >>>>> and >> >>>>> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the >> >>>>> following part >> >>>>> of it: >> >>>>> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Rocky. >> >>>> >> >>>> That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. >> >>> >> >>> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero" >> >>> and not >> >>> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." >> >>> >> >>> Again from above: >> >>> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase "Ground >> >>> Zero"' >> >>> >> >>> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used to >> >>> level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" could >> >>> have >> >>> been used instead of changing that definition after the Great 9/11 >> >>> hoax. OK? Rocky >> >> >> >> Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" get >> >> planted deep underground... below the WTC... without anybody knowing? >> > >> > They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And rumor has >> > it that was part of the reason it took so long to built the replacement >> > for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a nuke too. >> > >> > >> >> Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the towers a >> >> mass hallucination? >> > >> > You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if it >> > hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. Here, dig >> > this video >> > and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to make a >> > CGI >> > slide right into the South Tower.: >> > https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s >> > >> > And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real world >> > can be found here: >> > https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s >> > >> > Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a lot of >> > videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: >> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw >> > >> > Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can easily be >> > recreated by 3D software and if they leave the default setting where >> > the wings reflect the sky. >> > >> > I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the above >> > video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on 9/11/01 but >> > it took be a little bit longer before I could accept the fact the >> > Twin Towers were nuked. >> > Rocky >> >> they weren't real buildings they were holograms > > ...in a parallel universe. Obviously you two never bothered to check out the above links. Probably because you worship your TV. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 15:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <GaGdnegxY95ymVDInZ2dnUU7-e2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #263323 |
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8mevdh.i7l.19.1@news.alt.net... > Rocky wrote: >> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... >>> In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>> wookiee@att.net says... >>> >>> >>>> >>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... >>>>> In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>> In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>> In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> usenet.kooks removed >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" >>>>>>>>>>>> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 110 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Survivors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stairwell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specially >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are quite insane. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? How >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactivity? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also tell >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they did >>>>>>>>>>>>>> after >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the hypocenters. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those >>>>>>>>>>>>>> poor >>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bargained >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was >>>>>>>>>>>> a great >>>>>>>>>>>> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media to >>>>>>>>>>>> reality. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can not >>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the media >>>>>>>>>>>> wants >>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris piles >>>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>> "Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>> Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the height >>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate exactly >>>>>>>>>>>> where >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest walls >>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin >>>>>>>>>>>> Towers neither >>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>> the underground nukes >>>>>>>>>>>> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height of >>>>>>>>>>>> the surviving walls and height of the surviving corners >>>>>>>>>>>> places the >>>>>>>>>>>> deep >>>>>>>>>>>> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Because if they news media had been honest the dictionaries >>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for their >>>>>>>>>> bullshit. >>>>>>>>>> DUH. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the epicenter >>>>>>>>> of an >>>>>>>>> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, it's >>>>>>>>> not necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. HTH >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before >>>>>>>> 9/11/01. >>>>>>>> <G> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here, this will help: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - >>>>>>>> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What has that got to do with my statement? >>>>>> >>>>>> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and over >>>>>> and over >>>>>> and >>>>>> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the >>>>>> following part >>>>>> of it: >>>>>> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky. >>>>> >>>>> That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. >>>> >>>> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero" >>>> and not >>>> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." >>>> >>>> Again from above: >>>> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase "Ground >>>> Zero"' >>>> >>>> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used to >>>> level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" could >>>> have >>>> been used instead of changing that definition after the Great 9/11 >>>> hoax. OK? Rocky >>> >>> Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" get >>> planted deep underground... below the WTC... without anybody knowing? >> >> They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And rumor has >> it that was part of the reason it took so long to built the replacement >> for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a nuke too. >> >> >>> Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the towers a >>> mass hallucination? >> >> You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if it >> hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. Here, dig >> this video >> and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to make a CGI >> slide right into the South Tower.: >> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s >> >> And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real world >> can be found here: >> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s >> >> Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a lot of >> videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw >> >> Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can easily be >> recreated by 3D software and if they leave the default setting where >> the wings reflect the sky. >> >> I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the above >> video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on 9/11/01 but >> it took be a little bit longer before I could accept the fact the >> Twin Towers were nuked. >> Rocky > > they weren't real buildings they were holograms Given all the inconsistencies with the placement of helicopters and the background something was most certainly strange about the background images but all I can say for sure is Ground Zero was called "Ground Zero" for the original meaning of that phrase and not the post 9/11 definition of that phrase. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 14:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8mfmki.b42.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #263344 |
Rocky wrote: > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:8mevdh.i7l.19.1@news.alt.net... >> Rocky wrote: >>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>> news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... >>>> In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... >>>>>> In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>> In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>> In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> usenet.kooks removed >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" >>>>>>>>>>>>> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 110 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Survivors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stairwell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specially >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are quite insane. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactivity? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the hypocenters. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bargained >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 >>>>>>>>>>>>> was a great >>>>>>>>>>>>> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media to >>>>>>>>>>>>> reality. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can >>>>>>>>>>>>> not be >>>>>>>>>>>>> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the media >>>>>>>>>>>>> wants >>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris piles >>>>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>>> Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the >>>>>>>>>>>>> height of >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate >>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly where >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest walls >>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin >>>>>>>>>>>>> Towers neither >>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>> the underground nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height of >>>>>>>>>>>>> the surviving walls and height of the surviving corners >>>>>>>>>>>>> places the >>>>>>>>>>>>> deep >>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Because if they news media had been honest the dictionaries >>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for their >>>>>>>>>>> bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>> DUH. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the epicenter >>>>>>>>>> of an >>>>>>>>>> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, it's >>>>>>>>>> not necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. HTH >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before >>>>>>>>> 9/11/01. >>>>>>>>> <G> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Here, this will help: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - >>>>>>>>> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov >>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What has that got to do with my statement? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and over >>>>>>> and over >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the >>>>>>> following part >>>>>>> of it: >>>>>>> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rocky. >>>>>> >>>>>> That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. >>>>> >>>>> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero" >>>>> and not >>>>> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." >>>>> >>>>> Again from above: >>>>> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase >>>>> "Ground Zero"' >>>>> >>>>> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used to >>>>> level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" >>>>> could have >>>>> been used instead of changing that definition after the Great 9/11 >>>>> hoax. OK? Rocky >>>> >>>> Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" get >>>> planted deep underground... below the WTC... without anybody >>>> knowing? >>> >>> They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And rumor >>> has it that was part of the reason it took so long to built the >>> replacement for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a nuke too. >>> >>> >>>> Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the towers >>>> a mass hallucination? >>> >>> You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if it >>> hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. Here, >>> dig this video >>> and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to make >>> a CGI slide right into the South Tower.: >>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s >>> >>> And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real world >>> can be found here: >>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s >>> >>> Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a lot of >>> videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw >>> >>> Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can easily >>> be recreated by 3D software and if they leave the default setting >>> where the wings reflect the sky. >>> >>> I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the above >>> video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on 9/11/01 but >>> it took be a little bit longer before I could accept the fact the >>> Twin Towers were nuked. >>> Rocky >> >> they weren't real buildings they were holograms > > Given all the inconsistencies with the placement of helicopters and > the background something was most certainly strange about the > background images but all I can say for sure is Ground Zero was > called "Ground Zero" for the original meaning of that phrase and not > the post 9/11 definition of that phrase. > > Rocky i call it the day the trade towers got knocked down
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 16:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <GbydndIj6_C7llDInZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #263351 |
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8mfmki.b42.17.1@news.alt.net... > Rocky wrote: >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:8mevdh.i7l.19.1@news.alt.net... >>> Rocky wrote: >>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>> news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... >>>>> In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>> In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>> In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>>> In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> usenet.kooks removed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 110 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Survivors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stairwell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specially >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are quite insane. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactivity? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the hypocenters. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bargained >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was a great >>>>>>>>>>>>>> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reality. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the media >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wants >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris piles >>>>>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> height of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate >>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly where >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest walls >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Towers neither >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the underground nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the surviving walls and height of the surviving corners >>>>>>>>>>>>>> places the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> deep >>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Because if they news media had been honest the dictionaries >>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for their >>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>> DUH. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the epicenter >>>>>>>>>>> of an >>>>>>>>>>> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, it's >>>>>>>>>>> not necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. HTH >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before >>>>>>>>>> 9/11/01. >>>>>>>>>> <G> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Here, this will help: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - >>>>>>>>>> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov >>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What has that got to do with my statement? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and over >>>>>>>> and over >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the >>>>>>>> following part >>>>>>>> of it: >>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rocky. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. >>>>>> >>>>>> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero" >>>>>> and not >>>>>> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." >>>>>> >>>>>> Again from above: >>>>>> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase >>>>>> "Ground Zero"' >>>>>> >>>>>> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used to >>>>>> level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" >>>>>> could have >>>>>> been used instead of changing that definition after the Great 9/11 >>>>>> hoax. OK? Rocky >>>>> >>>>> Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" get >>>>> planted deep underground... below the WTC... without anybody >>>>> knowing? >>>> >>>> They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And rumor >>>> has it that was part of the reason it took so long to built the >>>> replacement for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a nuke too. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the towers >>>>> a mass hallucination? >>>> >>>> You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if it >>>> hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. Here, >>>> dig this video >>>> and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to make >>>> a CGI slide right into the South Tower.: >>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s >>>> >>>> And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real world >>>> can be found here: >>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s >>>> >>>> Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a lot of >>>> videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw >>>> >>>> Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can easily >>>> be recreated by 3D software and if they leave the default setting >>>> where the wings reflect the sky. >>>> >>>> I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the above >>>> video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on 9/11/01 but >>>> it took be a little bit longer before I could accept the fact the >>>> Twin Towers were nuked. >>>> Rocky >>> >>> they weren't real buildings they were holograms >> >> Given all the inconsistencies with the placement of helicopters and >> the background something was most certainly strange about the >> background images but all I can say for sure is Ground Zero was >> called "Ground Zero" for the original meaning of that phrase and not >> the post 9/11 definition of that phrase. >> >> Rocky > > i call it the day the trade towers got knocked down But don't stop there because they floated away for the next month and maybe longer. And given how long they floated away also supports the fact they were nuked and that the original meaning of "Ground Zero" applies to Ground Zero and the definition of Ground Zero did not really have to be changed after 9/11/01. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 14:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8mfo1p.j5k.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #263357 |
Rocky wrote: > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:8mfmki.b42.17.1@news.alt.net... >> Rocky wrote: >>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:8mevdh.i7l.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>> news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... >>>>>> In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>> In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>> In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usenet.kooks removed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 110 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Survivors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stairwell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specially >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are quite insane. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactivity? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocenters. Those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bargained >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was a great >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to reality. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media wants >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piles than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> height of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly where >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> walls will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Towers neither >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the underground nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the surviving walls and height of the surviving corners >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> places the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deep >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Because if they news media had been honest the >>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries would >>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for >>>>>>>>>>>>> their bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>>> DUH. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the >>>>>>>>>>>> epicenter of an >>>>>>>>>>>> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, >>>>>>>>>>>> it's not necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. >>>>>>>>>>>> HTH >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before >>>>>>>>>>> 9/11/01. >>>>>>>>>>> <G> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Here, this will help: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - >>>>>>>>>>> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What has that got to do with my statement? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and >>>>>>>>> over and over >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the >>>>>>>>> following part >>>>>>>>> of it: >>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rocky. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground >>>>>>> Zero" and not >>>>>>> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Again from above: >>>>>>> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase >>>>>>> "Ground Zero"' >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used to >>>>>>> level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" >>>>>>> could have >>>>>>> been used instead of changing that definition after the Great >>>>>>> 9/11 hoax. OK? Rocky >>>>>> >>>>>> Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" >>>>>> get planted deep underground... below the WTC... without anybody >>>>>> knowing? >>>>> >>>>> They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And rumor >>>>> has it that was part of the reason it took so long to built the >>>>> replacement for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a nuke >>>>> too. >>>>>> Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the >>>>>> towers a mass hallucination? >>>>> >>>>> You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if it >>>>> hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. Here, >>>>> dig this video >>>>> and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to >>>>> make a CGI slide right into the South Tower.: >>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s >>>>> >>>>> And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real >>>>> world can be found here: >>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s >>>>> >>>>> Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a lot of >>>>> videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw >>>>> >>>>> Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can easily >>>>> be recreated by 3D software and if they leave the default setting >>>>> where the wings reflect the sky. >>>>> >>>>> I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the >>>>> above video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on 9/11/01 >>>>> but it took be a little bit longer before I could accept the fact the >>>>> Twin Towers were nuked. >>>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> they weren't real buildings they were holograms >>> >>> Given all the inconsistencies with the placement of helicopters and >>> the background something was most certainly strange about the >>> background images but all I can say for sure is Ground Zero was >>> called "Ground Zero" for the original meaning of that phrase and not >>> the post 9/11 definition of that phrase. >>> >>> Rocky >> >> i call it the day the trade towers got knocked down > > But don't stop there because they floated away for the next month and > maybe longer. And given how long they floated away also supports the > fact they were nuked and that the original meaning of "Ground Zero" > applies to > Ground Zero and the definition of Ground Zero did not really have to be > changed after 9/11/01. > > Rocky there was no ground zero
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 16:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <LcmdnXTw08zajVDInZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #263362 |
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8mfo1p.j5k.17.1@news.alt.net... > Rocky wrote: >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:8mfmki.b42.17.1@news.alt.net... >>> Rocky wrote: >>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:8mevdh.i7l.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>> news:MPG.30356e264bc7b73198ab8c@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>> In article <HM6dnQr3-rZEWVbInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:MPG.30355e168889dea198ab8a@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>> In article <0tqdnUenpqYGJ1bInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.3035588e92bf01af98ab88@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>>> In article <5o2dnbfeb6xfKVbInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.30352c4d92d5eb7898ab77@news.altopia.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <KpOdndicL5k-_1bInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> wookiee@att.net says... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8mcchs.dsh.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usenet.kooks removed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 110 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corners and in the case of the North Tower leave >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Survivors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stairwell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the furthest from the hypocenters. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specially >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are quite insane. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> radioactivity? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like very black dirt to fill in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocenters. Those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers probably got a lot more radiation than they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bargained >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was a great >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> big hoax is compare the bullshit stories from the media >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to reality. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought down by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media wants >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe. Buildings that leave much smaller debris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piles than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Controlled >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Demolition. After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> height of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surviving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walls and Surviving Corners can be used to indicate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly where >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nuke was detonated because the shortest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> walls will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closest to the detonation. And in the case of the Twin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Towers neither >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the underground nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was detonated under the Twin Towers because the height >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the surviving walls and height of the surviving corners >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> places the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deep >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground nukes under WTC3 and WTC4. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what does it matter how it blew up , it blew up >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because if they news media had been honest the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionaries would >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>> had to redefine the phrase "Ground Zero" to cover for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> their bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> DUH. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Ground zero" is simply a phrase that refers to the >>>>>>>>>>>>> epicenter of an >>>>>>>>>>>>> event. While commonly used to describe nuclear events, >>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not necessarily confined to that strict interpretation. >>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, now tell me what "Ground Zero" used to stand for before >>>>>>>>>>>> 9/11/01. >>>>>>>>>>>> <G> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Here, this will help: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - >>>>>>>>>>>> This video is dedicated to Dimitri Khalezov >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What has that got to do with my statement? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It shows the original definition of "Ground Zero" over and >>>>>>>>>> over and over >>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> you would have known that yourself if you had looked at the >>>>>>>>>> following part >>>>>>>>>> of it: >>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/lFZ8UcMgucY?t=30s >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Rocky. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That doesn't contradict my statement, ko0k. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All you did was quote the post 9/11/01 definition of "Ground >>>>>>>> Zero" and not >>>>>>>> the pre 9/11/01 definition of "Ground Zero." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Again from above: >>>>>>>> 'the dictionaries would not have had to redefine the phrase >>>>>>>> "Ground Zero"' >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Had the media admitted that deep underground nukes were used to >>>>>>>> level the Twin Towers the original definition of "Ground Zero" >>>>>>>> could have >>>>>>>> been used instead of changing that definition after the Great >>>>>>>> 9/11 hoax. OK? Rocky >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Okay, I'll play along for a minute or two. How did the "nukes" >>>>>>> get planted deep underground... below the WTC... without anybody >>>>>>> knowing? >>>>>> >>>>>> They were probably planted before WTC7 was ever built. And rumor >>>>>> has it that was part of the reason it took so long to built the >>>>>> replacement for WTC7 was they didn't want to load it with a nuke >>>>>> too. >>>>>>> Were the two jet planes that everyone saw crashing into the >>>>>>> towers a mass hallucination? >>>>>> >>>>>> You might want to look up the term "Crisis Actor" because if it >>>>>> hadn't been for them nobody would have said they saw a jet. Here, >>>>>> dig this video >>>>>> and I have it start at the place that shows how easy it was to >>>>>> make a CGI slide right into the South Tower.: >>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=31m40s >>>>>> >>>>>> And what they used to synchronize the bogus jets with the real >>>>>> world can be found here: >>>>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=34m46s >>>>>> >>>>>> Plus there were a lot of people that didn't see jets and a lot of >>>>>> videos where the bogus CGIs were not added to them see: >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh yes, the disappearing wing on the alleged Flight 175 can easily >>>>>> be recreated by 3D software and if they leave the default setting >>>>>> where the wings reflect the sky. >>>>>> >>>>>> I always had my doubts on Flights 77 and 93 but once I saw the >>>>>> above video called "The Key" I knew no jets at all crashed on 9/11/01 >>>>>> but it took be a little bit longer before I could accept the fact the >>>>>> Twin Towers were nuked. >>>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> they weren't real buildings they were holograms >>>> >>>> Given all the inconsistencies with the placement of helicopters and >>>> the background something was most certainly strange about the >>>> background images but all I can say for sure is Ground Zero was >>>> called "Ground Zero" for the original meaning of that phrase and not >>>> the post 9/11 definition of that phrase. >>>> >>>> Rocky >>> >>> i call it the day the trade towers got knocked down >> >> But don't stop there because they floated away for the next month and >> maybe longer. And given how long they floated away also supports the >> fact they were nuked and that the original meaning of "Ground Zero" >> applies to >> Ground Zero and the definition of Ground Zero did not really have to be >> changed after 9/11/01. >> >> Rocky > > there was no ground zero ROTFLMAO because it is consistent with other Ground Zeros after you consider a large amount of debris floated away, that there were EMPs recorded by WCBS in Nuke York City when the North Tower was vaporized and there was a lot of clean up of radioactive waste like where they kept washing boots off because that is SOP for places where there is a lot of radiation. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.conspiracy
csiph-web