Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #271396 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-27 07:53 -0600 |
| Last post | 2015-12-02 15:20 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 107 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.conspiracy
Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-27 07:53 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-27 10:09 -0800
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-28 09:41 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-28 08:36 -0800
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-28 17:17 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-28 14:23 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-29 00:49 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-29 02:50 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-29 14:10 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-11-29 07:01 -0800
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-29 11:32 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-29 20:16 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-08 16:16 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-09 05:15 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-09 17:26 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-29 09:01 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-11-29 14:49 -0800
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-29 15:12 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-29 11:41 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-29 18:10 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-01 16:41 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-02 00:45 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-08 16:36 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-09 02:01 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-29 15:34 -0500
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-29 22:25 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 03:29 -0500
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-30 14:57 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-30 09:12 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-30 16:32 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-30 16:40 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-01 01:24 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-01 16:58 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-02 00:48 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 13:20 -0500
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 16:38 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-29 15:32 -0500
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-29 22:24 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-30 07:39 -0500
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-30 15:16 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-30 16:42 -0500
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-01 01:23 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-01 16:50 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-02 00:46 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Notroll2015" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-11-28 13:30 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-28 14:18 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-02 09:10 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-02 15:37 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-28 17:58 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-28 19:54 -0500
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-02 11:48 -0800
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 16:16 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-12-03 09:25 +1100
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-03 04:03 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-02 22:36 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-03 04:03 -0600
where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-28 20:04 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-29 01:54 +0000
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 08:21 -0600
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 03:26 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-29 15:38 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-29 14:51 -0800
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Notroll2015" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-11-29 19:31 -0600
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-30 08:03 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-30 07:58 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 13:18 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-30 16:46 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 17:29 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-30 19:27 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 19:33 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-01 18:40 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-01 20:37 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-01 23:27 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-02 02:08 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-02 10:02 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-02 23:31 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-03 11:07 +0000
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-03 16:43 -0600
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-04 01:49 +0000
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-04 03:18 +0000
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-02 02:23 +0000
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-01 04:40 +0000
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 23:50 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 03:55 -0600
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 16:39 -0600
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 16:39 -0600
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-30 00:06 -0600
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 03:35 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-30 15:51 +0000
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 15:36 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 15:51 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 03:32 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-30 08:13 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 13:18 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-01 18:42 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-01 20:37 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-12-01 23:02 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-02 05:43 -0800
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-12-02 10:32 -0600
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-02 12:40 -0800
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 04:35 -0600
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 03:44 -0600
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-30 15:55 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-29 15:26 -0500
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 03:29 -0500
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2015-12-01 23:58 -0800
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-02 15:20 +0000
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-27 07:53 -0600 |
| Subject | Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM |
| Message-ID | <aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com> |
Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the building was rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus propaganda about a 757. "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent with a ship sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with CGIs and the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because the gash in the ground was there before 9/11? Rocky
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-27 10:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #271396 |
"Rocky" wrote in message news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the building was rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus propaganda about a 757. "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent with a ship sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with CGIs and the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because the gash in the ground was there before 9/11? Rocky *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked at Boston's Logan airport. Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was self destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of passenger interference. Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after all, it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a single airport reported the unscheduled landing of an airliner full of scared shitless passengers and a compliment of demented Muslim fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling "Allah Fuckbar", you demented asshole troll.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-28 09:41 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #271407 |
"Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... > "Rocky" wrote in message > news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... > > Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the building > was > rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus propaganda > about > a 757. > > "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 > NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM > > And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent with a > ship > sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with CGIs and > the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because the gash > in > the ground was there before 9/11? > > Rocky > > > *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked at > Boston's Logan airport. > Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. > Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned > The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was self > destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of passenger > interference. > > Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, tell us > then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after all, it had to be > somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a single airport reported the > unscheduled landing of an airliner full of scared shitless passengers and > a compliment of demented Muslim fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling > "Allah Fuckbar", you demented asshole troll. ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings so you can scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they turned bogus in flight. BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might have had the real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land in Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those marks in the ground were there pre 9/11. And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? And if two jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily recreated by 3D software? And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad movie and that is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the remains of the Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a vaporized building. See: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-28 08:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #271437 |
"Rocky" wrote in message news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... > "Rocky" wrote in message > news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... > > Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the > building was > rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus > propaganda about > a 757. > > "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 > NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM > > And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent > with a ship > sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with > CGIs and > the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because the > gash in > the ground was there before 9/11? > > Rocky > > > *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked at > Boston's Logan airport. > Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. > Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned > The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was self > destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of passenger > interference. > > Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, > tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after all, > it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a single > airport reported the unscheduled landing of an airliner full of > scared shitless passengers and a compliment of demented Muslim > fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling "Allah Fuckbar", you > demented asshole troll. ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings so you can scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they turned bogus in flight. BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might have had the real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land in Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those marks in the ground were there pre 9/11. And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? And if two jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily recreated by 3D software? And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad movie and that is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the remains of the Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a vaporized building. See: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I think most of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. But once again, those are irrefutable facts, which raises havoc among you and your mentally challenged conspiracy peers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-28 17:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18> |
| In reply to | #271445 |
Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: > > > "Rocky" wrote in message > news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... > > > "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >> "Rocky" wrote in message >> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >> >> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the >> building was >> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >> propaganda about >> a 757. >> >> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 >> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >> >> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent >> with a ship >> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with >> CGIs and >> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because the >> gash in >> the ground was there before 9/11? >> >> Rocky >> >> >> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked at >> Boston's Logan airport. >> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was self >> destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of passenger >> interference. >> >> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, >> tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after all, >> it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a single >> airport reported the unscheduled landing of an airliner full of >> scared shitless passengers and a compliment of demented Muslim >> fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling "Allah Fuckbar", you >> demented asshole troll. > > ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings so > you can > scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were either > completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they turned bogus in > flight. > > BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might have had > the > real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land in > Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those marks in the > ground > were there pre 9/11. > > And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? And if > two > jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily recreated by > 3D > software? > > And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad movie and > that > is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the remains of > the > Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a > vaporized > building. See: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Rocky > > > > *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I think most > of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. But once again, > those are irrefutable facts, which raises havoc among you and your > mentally challenged conspiracy peers. I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from both Rocky and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are dumber than Michael Jackson fans. These are the kind of fucktards who dishonor the brave people who lost their lives trying to help the victims. -- Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*, alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895. "When the students and newsgroups and world is ready, the master appears" - Edmond Wollmann, trying ever so hard to be modest.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-28 14:23 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <l7Sdnd0Ljpk9kMfLnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #271448 |
"Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message news:XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... > Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in > news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: > >> >> >> "Rocky" wrote in message >> news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... >> >> >> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >>> >>> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the >>> building was >>> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >>> propaganda about >>> a 757. >>> >>> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 >>> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >>> >>> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent >>> with a ship >>> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with >>> CGIs and >>> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because the >>> gash in >>> the ground was there before 9/11? >>> >>> Rocky >>> >>> >>> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked at >>> Boston's Logan airport. >>> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >>> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >>> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was self >>> destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of passenger >>> interference. >>> >>> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, >>> tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after all, >>> it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a single >>> airport reported the unscheduled landing of an airliner full of >>> scared shitless passengers and a compliment of demented Muslim >>> fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling "Allah Fuckbar", you >>> demented asshole troll. >> >> ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings so >> you can >> scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were either >> completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they turned bogus in >> flight. >> >> BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might have had >> the >> real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land in >> Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those marks in the >> ground >> were there pre 9/11. >> >> And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? And if >> two >> jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily recreated by >> 3D >> software? >> >> And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad movie and >> that >> is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the remains of >> the >> Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a >> vaporized >> building. See: >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> Rocky >> >> >> >> *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I think most >> of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. But once again, >> those are irrefutable facts, which raises havoc among you and your >> mentally challenged conspiracy peers. > > I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from both Rocky > and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are dumber than Michael > Jackson fans. BULLSHIT. There is no live TV anywhere because they always have to have a few seconds delay and in the case of 9/11 it was a 17 second delay and that gave them plenty of time to add CGIs to their videos. DUH. Don't forget the two jets in Nuke York City can be easily reproduced with 3D software including the "Disappearing Wing" and the remains of the Twin Towers do not resemble a collapsed building but a vaporized building. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg The kooks are the ones that never looked for any inconsistencies with the 9/11 BULLSHIT. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 00:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA560C998DA1A2stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18> |
| In reply to | #271456 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in news:l7Sdnd0Ljpk9kMfLnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@giganews.com: > > "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message > news:XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >> Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in >> news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: >> >>> >>> >>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>> news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... >>> >>> >>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>> >>>> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the >>>> building was >>>> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >>>> propaganda about >>>> a 757. >>>> >>>> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 >>>> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >>>> >>>> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent >>>> with a ship >>>> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with >>>> CGIs and >>>> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because >>>> the gash in >>>> the ground was there before 9/11? >>>> >>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> >>>> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked >>>> at Boston's Logan airport. >>>> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >>>> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >>>> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was self >>>> destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of passenger >>>> interference. >>>> >>>> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, >>>> tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after all, >>>> it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a single >>>> airport reported the unscheduled landing of an airliner full of >>>> scared shitless passengers and a compliment of demented Muslim >>>> fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling "Allah Fuckbar", you >>>> demented asshole troll. >>> >>> ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings so >>> you can >>> scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were >>> either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they turned >>> bogus in flight. >>> >>> BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might have >>> had the >>> real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land in >>> Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those marks in >>> the ground >>> were there pre 9/11. >>> >>> And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? And >>> if two >>> jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily recreated >>> by 3D >>> software? >>> >>> And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad movie >>> and that >>> is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the remains >>> of the >>> Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a >>> vaporized >>> building. See: >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >>> Rocky >>> >>> >>> >>> *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I think >>> most of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. But once >>> again, those are irrefutable facts, which raises havoc among you and >>> your mentally challenged conspiracy peers. >> >> I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from both >> Rocky and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are dumber than >> Michael Jackson fans. > > BULLSHIT. There is no live TV anywhere because they always have to > have a few seconds delay and in the case of 9/11 it was a 17 second > delay and that gave them plenty of time to add CGIs to their videos. > DUH. Aside from WNEW and other radio stations located in Manhattan, I would indeed suggest that there are indeed live stations. You seem to have forgotten about the public access channels and weather stations. For that matter, there are also satellite and radar images. But they have to all be wrong to fit your claims. A 17 second delay from a local station? That's 7 seconds, Rocky. Your CGI claim is even more ludicrous. Is there anything you don't believe other than provable facts? > Don't forget the two jets in Nuke York City can be easily reproduced > with 3D software including the "Disappearing Wing" and the remains of > the Twin Towers do not resemble a collapsed building but a vaporized > building. > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg I really don't know how you could confuse software that's designed to mimic actual physical occurrances with what actually happens but trotting out a completely discredited website with no other sources is enough to show everyone your agenda. > The kooks are the ones that never looked for any inconsistencies with > the 9/11 BULLSHIT. With so many people, including many who would love to prove it wasn't a Gubmint plot, who have pored over this and the exceptonal efforts of those who exposed the culprits, I find your repeated belittling of this to be something a terrorist and propagandist would try. Are you a traitor and a terrorist, Rocky? Which cell are you attached to, murderer? -- Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*, alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895. "When the students and newsgroups and world is ready, the master appears" - Edmond Wollmann, trying ever so hard to be modest.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 02:50 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <P_CdnZ6G65pOIcfLnZ2dnUU7-cOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #271457 |
"Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message news:XnsA560C998DA1A2stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in > news:l7Sdnd0Ljpk9kMfLnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@giganews.com: > >> >> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >> news:XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>> Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in >>> news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>> news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... >>>> >>>> >>>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>> >>>>> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the >>>>> building was >>>>> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >>>>> propaganda about >>>>> a 757. >>>>> >>>>> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 >>>>> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >>>>> >>>>> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent >>>>> with a ship >>>>> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with >>>>> CGIs and >>>>> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because >>>>> the gash in >>>>> the ground was there before 9/11? >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked >>>>> at Boston's Logan airport. >>>>> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >>>>> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >>>>> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was self >>>>> destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of passenger >>>>> interference. >>>>> >>>>> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, >>>>> tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after all, >>>>> it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a single >>>>> airport reported the unscheduled landing of an airliner full of >>>>> scared shitless passengers and a compliment of demented Muslim >>>>> fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling "Allah Fuckbar", you >>>>> demented asshole troll. >>>> >>>> ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings so >>>> you can >>>> scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were >>>> either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they turned >>>> bogus in flight. >>>> >>>> BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might have >>>> had the >>>> real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land in >>>> Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those marks in >>>> the ground >>>> were there pre 9/11. >>>> >>>> And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? And >>>> if two >>>> jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily recreated >>>> by 3D >>>> software? >>>> >>>> And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad movie >>>> and that >>>> is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the remains >>>> of the >>>> Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a >>>> vaporized >>>> building. See: >>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>> >>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I think >>>> most of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. But once >>>> again, those are irrefutable facts, which raises havoc among you and >>>> your mentally challenged conspiracy peers. >>> >>> I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from both >>> Rocky and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are dumber than >>> Michael Jackson fans. >> >> BULLSHIT. There is no live TV anywhere because they always have to >> have a few seconds delay and in the case of 9/11 it was a 17 second >> delay and that gave them plenty of time to add CGIs to their videos. >> DUH. > > Aside from WNEW and other radio stations located in Manhattan, I would > indeed suggest that there are indeed live stations. You seem to have > forgotten about the public access channels and weather stations. > > For that matter, there are also satellite and radar images. But they have > to all be wrong to fit your claims. > > A 17 second delay from a local station? That's 7 seconds, Rocky. Your CGI > claim is even more ludicrous. Is there anything you don't believe other > than provable facts? > >> Don't forget the two jets in Nuke York City can be easily reproduced >> with 3D software including the "Disappearing Wing" and the remains of >> the Twin Towers do not resemble a collapsed building but a vaporized >> building. >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > I really don't know how you could confuse software that's designed to > mimic actual physical occurrances with what actually happens but trotting > out a completely discredited website with no other sources is enough to > show everyone your agenda. > >> The kooks are the ones that never looked for any inconsistencies with >> the 9/11 BULLSHIT. > > With so many people, including many who would love to prove it wasn't a > Gubmint plot, who have pored over this and the exceptonal efforts of > those who exposed the culprits, I find your repeated belittling of this > to be something a terrorist and propagandist would try. Are you a traitor > and a terrorist, Rocky? Which cell are you attached to, murderer? Just look at the facts for yourself. The two CGIs flew right into the Twin Towers without slowing down or losing parts and for that to happen in real life the Twin Towers would have to be a lot softer than birds and I doubt that. And just think for a minute. In a real building collapse what ends up on top? Certainly not items at the very bottom of the building but that is what happened so the Twin Towers had to be vaporized before they collapsed and what everybody saw is possible with deep underground MRR nukes. See: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 14:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n3f111$gp2$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #271467 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >Just look at the facts for yourself. Rocky the kooktard post facts? Very unlikely! >The two CGIs flew right into the Twin Towers without slowing down or losing >parts and for that to happen in real life the Twin Towers would have to be a >lot softer than birds and I doubt that. I posted many times that the planes did slow down. Calculate the speed of the plane immediately before impact. Find the time between when first contact was made and the time the first debris exited the other side. Divide the size of the tower by this time to get the speed of the debris. You'll find it is less, so it did slow down. And obviously it did lose parts! >And just think for a minute. In a real building collapse what ends up on >top? Certainly not items at the very bottom of the building but that is >what happened We know from many videos that the lower 40-60 stories of the cores from the towers remained standing for many seconds (this also disproves your "vaporization" bullshit BTW) before they, too, collapsed. So the core remains would be on top of the huge pile that you show in your blast3.jpeg picture (the one with all the kookscribbles added).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | edrhodes@hotmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 07:01 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ab610d01-fb9c-493b-be73-1e668164d431@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #271471 |
On Sunday, November 29, 2015 at 9:10:47 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > > >Just look at the facts for yourself. > > Rocky the kooktard post facts? Very unlikely! > > >The two CGIs flew right into the Twin Towers without slowing down or losing > >parts and for that to happen in real life the Twin Towers would have to be a > >lot softer than birds and I doubt that. > > I posted many times that the planes did slow down. Calculate the speed of > the plane immediately before impact. Find the time between when first > contact was made and the time the first debris exited the other side. > Divide the size of the tower by this time to get the speed of the debris. > You'll find it is less, so it did slow down. And obviously it did lose > parts! > > >And just think for a minute. In a real building collapse what ends up on > >top? Certainly not items at the very bottom of the building but that is > >what happened > > We know from many videos that the lower 40-60 stories of the cores from > the towers remained standing for many seconds (this also disproves your > "vaporization" bullshit BTW) before they, too, collapsed. So the core > remains would be on top of the huge pile that you show in your blast3.jpeg > picture (the one with all the kookscribbles added). Rocky's made up his mind. Stop trying to confuse him with facts!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 11:32 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <saOdneLp3PT4q8bLnZ2dnUU7-LWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #271474 |
<edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ab610d01-fb9c-493b-be73-1e668164d431@googlegroups.com... > On Sunday, November 29, 2015 at 9:10:47 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >> >Just look at the facts for yourself. >> >> Rocky the kooktard post facts? Very unlikely! >> >> >The two CGIs flew right into the Twin Towers without slowing down or >> >losing >> >parts and for that to happen in real life the Twin Towers would have to >> >be a >> >lot softer than birds and I doubt that. >> >> I posted many times that the planes did slow down. Calculate the speed >> of >> the plane immediately before impact. Find the time between when first >> contact was made and the time the first debris exited the other side. >> Divide the size of the tower by this time to get the speed of the debris. >> You'll find it is less, so it did slow down. And obviously it did lose >> parts! >> >> >And just think for a minute. In a real building collapse what ends up >> >on >> >top? Certainly not items at the very bottom of the building but that is >> >what happened >> >> We know from many videos that the lower 40-60 stories of the cores from >> the towers remained standing for many seconds (this also disproves your >> "vaporization" bullshit BTW) before they, too, collapsed. So the core >> remains would be on top of the huge pile that you show in your >> blast3.jpeg >> picture (the one with all the kookscribbles added). > > Rocky's made up his mind. Stop trying to confuse him with facts! ROTFLMAO because if parts really flew out of the South Tower why didn't they leave holes? Oh that's right CGI don't make holes. DUH Just don't forget there are a lot of videos without jets in them as in the following: 9/11 no planes compilation - interesting! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw And never forget that a "global collapse" has never left things at the very bottom of the buildings standing strong until 9/11. See: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 20:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n3fmfj$i58$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #271481 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: ><edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:ab610d01-fb9c-493b-be73-1e668164d431@googlegroups.com... >> On Sunday, November 29, 2015 at 9:10:47 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >>> I posted many times that the planes did slow down. Calculate the speed >>> of >>> the plane immediately before impact. Find the time between when first >>> contact was made and the time the first debris exited the other side. >>> Divide the size of the tower by this time to get the speed of the debris. >>> You'll find it is less, so it did slow down. And obviously it did lose >>> parts! >> >> Rocky's made up his mind. Stop trying to confuse him with facts! >ROTFLMAO because if parts really flew out of the South Tower why didn't they >leave holes? Because they did leave holes. http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_aJeegFsC3nY/RzjEunXnsGI/AAAAAAAAAZI/n3MD5SX_RYE/s1600-h/composite1+copy.jpg (and this is from a kookblog, too) >Just don't forget there are a lot of videos without jets in them as in the >following: > 9/11 no planes compilation - interesting! > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw That's the discredited video with the forgery with the clip with the crane, correct? The one you used to prove all kookvids lie!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-08 16:16 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <JuudnVwoC5OpyvrLnZ2dnUU7-cWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #271487 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:n3fmfj$i58$2@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >><edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>news:ab610d01-fb9c-493b-be73-1e668164d431@googlegroups.com... >>> On Sunday, November 29, 2015 at 9:10:47 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > >>>> I posted many times that the planes did slow down. Calculate the speed >>>> of >>>> the plane immediately before impact. Find the time between when first >>>> contact was made and the time the first debris exited the other side. >>>> Divide the size of the tower by this time to get the speed of the >>>> debris. >>>> You'll find it is less, so it did slow down. And obviously it did lose >>>> parts! >>> >>> Rocky's made up his mind. Stop trying to confuse him with facts! > >>ROTFLMAO because if parts really flew out of the South Tower why didn't >>they >>leave holes? > > Because they did leave holes. > > http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_aJeegFsC3nY/RzjEunXnsGI/AAAAAAAAAZI/n3MD5SX_RYE/s1600-h/composite1+copy.jpg ROTFLMAO because all that photo shows is fire and not holes. Now try to find a photo after those fires went out. <G> > (and this is from a kookblog, too) > >>Just don't forget there are a lot of videos without jets in them as in the >>following: >> 9/11 no planes compilation - interesting! >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw > > That's the discredited video with the forgery with the clip with the > crane, correct? The one you used to prove all kookvids lie! Dream on. You are forgetting that the evidence you found could also prove someone manipulated the original which is more like it since the official story keeps changing like who was the original pilot of the bogus Flight 77? <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-09 05:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n48dcp$ncc$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #271838 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:n3fmfj$i58$2@pcls7.std.com... >>>Just don't forget there are a lot of videos without jets in them as in the >>>following: >>> 9/11 no planes compilation - interesting! >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw >> >> That's the discredited video with the forgery with the clip with the >> crane, correct? The one you used to prove all kookvids lie! >Dream on. You are forgetting that the evidence you found could also prove >someone manipulated the original which is more like it since the official >story keeps changing like who was the original pilot of the bogus Flight 77? ><G> So if it was a forgery, it means that video is a lie. If someone "manipulated the original" as you kookclaim (with no evidence of that, but that's irrelevant), it means that video is a lie. So either way it means that video is a lie! So you are strengthening your proof that all kookvids lie! You're such a genius for making indisputable proof how all kookvids are nothing but lies!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-09 17:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n49o7r$dp2$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #271849 |
moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) writes: >"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:n3fmfj$i58$2@pcls7.std.com... >>> That's the discredited video with the forgery with the clip with the >>> crane, correct? The one you used to prove all kookvids lie! >>Dream on. You are forgetting that the evidence you found could also prove >>someone manipulated the original which is more like it since the official >>story keeps changing like who was the original pilot of the bogus Flight 77? >><G> >So if it was a forgery, it means that video is a lie. If someone >"manipulated the original" as you kookclaim (with no evidence of that, >but that's irrelevant), it means that video is a lie. So either way >it means that video is a lie! So you are strengthening your proof that >all kookvids lie! You're such a genius for making indisputable proof how >all kookvids are nothing but lies!! So Rocky, since I think we can agree that some kooktard "manipulated the original" of that video with the crane, to make it look like the plane was flying both in front of and behind the crane, why do you still reference it? After all, you know some kooktard "manipulated the original" making it false, and you know all kookvids are full of lies and are false anyway (since you proved that).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 09:01 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <OrWdnT1pY4gjjsbLnZ2dnUU7-QOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #271471 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:n3f111$gp2$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>Just look at the facts for yourself. > > Rocky the kooktard post facts? Very unlikely! > >>The two CGIs flew right into the Twin Towers without slowing down or >>losing >>parts and for that to happen in real life the Twin Towers would have to be >>a >>lot softer than birds and I doubt that. > > I posted many times that the planes did slow down. Calculate the speed of > the plane immediately before impact. Find the time between when first > contact was made and the time the first debris exited the other side. > Divide the size of the tower by this time to get the speed of the debris. > You'll find it is less, so it did slow down. And obviously it did lose > parts! ROTFLMAO because the jet engine found doesn't match the jet it was supposed to be from and there were no holes big enough for those parts to fly out of so that indicates the CGIs were on both sides of the buildings. >>And just think for a minute. In a real building collapse what ends up on >>top? Certainly not items at the very bottom of the building but that is >>what happened > > We know from many videos that the lower 40-60 stories of the cores from > the towers remained standing for many seconds (this also disproves your > "vaporization" bullshit BTW) before they, too, collapsed. So the core > remains would be on top of the huge pile that you show in your blast3.jpeg > picture (the one with all the kookscribbles added). But if the cores went down it was only ultra fine dust and oddly enough MRR nukes do that to buildings. BTW where do you think I learned about MRR nukes? <G> Fact remains that you, NIST or the 9/11 Commission can not explain why the very bottom of the Twin Towers had Survivors and multi-floor Surviving Corners but deep underground MRR nukes can. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | edrhodes@hotmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 14:49 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <de44e8cc-d159-408e-8dfa-8df1293046c8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #271475 |
> But if the cores went down it was only ultra fine dust and oddly enough MRR > nukes do that to buildings. BTW where do you think I learned about MRR > nukes? <G> Bad science fiction magazines?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 15:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA56167E1B57CAstillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18> |
| In reply to | #271467 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in news:P_CdnZ6G65pOIcfLnZ2dnUU7-cOdnZ2d@giganews.com: > > "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message > news:XnsA560C998DA1A2stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >> news:l7Sdnd0Ljpk9kMfLnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@giganews.com: >> >>> >>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>> news:XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>> Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>> news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>> news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>> >>>>>> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the >>>>>> building was >>>>>> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >>>>>> propaganda about >>>>>> a 757. >>>>>> >>>>>> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 >>>>>> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >>>>>> >>>>>> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent >>>>>> with a ship >>>>>> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with >>>>>> CGIs and >>>>>> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because >>>>>> the gash in >>>>>> the ground was there before 9/11? >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked >>>>>> at Boston's Logan airport. >>>>>> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >>>>>> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >>>>>> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was >>>>>> self destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of >>>>>> passenger interference. >>>>>> >>>>>> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, >>>>>> tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after >>>>>> all, it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a >>>>>> single airport reported the unscheduled landing of an airliner >>>>>> full of scared shitless passengers and a compliment of demented >>>>>> Muslim fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling "Allah >>>>>> Fuckbar", you demented asshole troll. >>>>> >>>>> ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings >>>>> so you can >>>>> scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were >>>>> either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they >>>>> turned bogus in flight. >>>>> >>>>> BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might have >>>>> had the >>>>> real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land in >>>>> Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those marks in >>>>> the ground >>>>> were there pre 9/11. >>>>> >>>>> And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? And >>>>> if two >>>>> jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily >>>>> recreated by 3D >>>>> software? >>>>> >>>>> And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad movie >>>>> and that >>>>> is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the remains >>>>> of the >>>>> Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a >>>>> vaporized >>>>> building. See: >>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I think >>>>> most of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. But once >>>>> again, those are irrefutable facts, which raises havoc among you >>>>> and your mentally challenged conspiracy peers. >>>> >>>> I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from both >>>> Rocky and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are dumber >>>> than Michael Jackson fans. >>> >>> BULLSHIT. There is no live TV anywhere because they always have to >>> have a few seconds delay and in the case of 9/11 it was a 17 second >>> delay and that gave them plenty of time to add CGIs to their videos. >>> DUH. >> >> Aside from WNEW and other radio stations located in Manhattan, I >> would indeed suggest that there are indeed live stations. You seem to >> have forgotten about the public access channels and weather stations. >> >> For that matter, there are also satellite and radar images. But they >> have to all be wrong to fit your claims. >> >> A 17 second delay from a local station? That's 7 seconds, Rocky. Your >> CGI claim is even more ludicrous. Is there anything you don't believe >> other than provable facts? >> >>> Don't forget the two jets in Nuke York City can be easily reproduced >>> with 3D software including the "Disappearing Wing" and the remains >>> of the Twin Towers do not resemble a collapsed building but a >>> vaporized building. >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> I really don't know how you could confuse software that's designed to >> mimic actual physical occurrances with what actually happens but >> trotting out a completely discredited website with no other sources >> is enough to show everyone your agenda. >> >>> The kooks are the ones that never looked for any inconsistencies >>> with the 9/11 BULLSHIT. >> >> With so many people, including many who would love to prove it wasn't >> a Gubmint plot, who have pored over this and the exceptonal efforts >> of those who exposed the culprits, I find your repeated belittling of >> this to be something a terrorist and propagandist would try. Are you >> a traitor and a terrorist, Rocky? Which cell are you attached to, >> murderer? Evasions noted. > > Just look at the facts for yourself. I asked you for something other than the same silly and much discredited site you cut and paste every post. I'm still waiting. It would help if it were credible. > The two CGIs flew right into the Twin Towers without slowing down or > losing parts and for that to happen in real life the Twin Towers would > have to be a lot softer than birds and I doubt that. Ever see a piece of straw that has penetrated a tree after a tornado? Same principle. > And just think for a minute. In a real building collapse what ends up > on top? It's going to vary upon multiple conditions. > Certainly not items at the very bottom of the building First off, you haven't established why that wouldn't be the case. > but > that is what happened so the Twin Towers had to be vaporized before > they collapsed and what everybody saw is possible with deep > underground MRR nukes. So underground nukes will vaporize the top of a building and leave the bottem? This is comedy gold. > See: http://www.kooksdaily/DE-Kookified!!!1!!! It's the same propaganda froma group that may well be terrorists issuing propaganda. Are you a member of that group? Have you been or the site vetted by Homeland Security? Why do you keep dodging my questions? -- Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*, alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895. "I am a good counselor WITHOUT any degree." - Ed speaks TRVTH.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 11:41 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <PMSdnb2_58D2pcbLnZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #271477 |
"Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message news:XnsA56167E1B57CAstillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in > news:P_CdnZ6G65pOIcfLnZ2dnUU7-cOdnZ2d@giganews.com: > >> >> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >> news:XnsA560C998DA1A2stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >>> news:l7Sdnd0Ljpk9kMfLnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@giganews.com: >>> >>>> >>>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>>> news:XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>>> Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>> news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>> news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>>> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the >>>>>>> building was >>>>>>> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >>>>>>> propaganda about >>>>>>> a 757. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 >>>>>>> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent >>>>>>> with a ship >>>>>>> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with >>>>>>> CGIs and >>>>>>> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because >>>>>>> the gash in >>>>>>> the ground was there before 9/11? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked >>>>>>> at Boston's Logan airport. >>>>>>> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >>>>>>> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >>>>>>> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was >>>>>>> self destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of >>>>>>> passenger interference. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, >>>>>>> tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after >>>>>>> all, it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a >>>>>>> single airport reported the unscheduled landing of an airliner >>>>>>> full of scared shitless passengers and a compliment of demented >>>>>>> Muslim fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling "Allah >>>>>>> Fuckbar", you demented asshole troll. >>>>>> >>>>>> ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings >>>>>> so you can >>>>>> scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were >>>>>> either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they >>>>>> turned bogus in flight. >>>>>> >>>>>> BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might have >>>>>> had the >>>>>> real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land in >>>>>> Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those marks in >>>>>> the ground >>>>>> were there pre 9/11. >>>>>> >>>>>> And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? And >>>>>> if two >>>>>> jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily >>>>>> recreated by 3D >>>>>> software? >>>>>> >>>>>> And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad movie >>>>>> and that >>>>>> is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the remains >>>>>> of the >>>>>> Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a >>>>>> vaporized >>>>>> building. See: >>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I think >>>>>> most of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. But once >>>>>> again, those are irrefutable facts, which raises havoc among you >>>>>> and your mentally challenged conspiracy peers. >>>>> >>>>> I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from both >>>>> Rocky and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are dumber >>>>> than Michael Jackson fans. >>>> >>>> BULLSHIT. There is no live TV anywhere because they always have to >>>> have a few seconds delay and in the case of 9/11 it was a 17 second >>>> delay and that gave them plenty of time to add CGIs to their videos. >>>> DUH. >>> >>> Aside from WNEW and other radio stations located in Manhattan, I >>> would indeed suggest that there are indeed live stations. You seem to >>> have forgotten about the public access channels and weather stations. >>> >>> For that matter, there are also satellite and radar images. But they >>> have to all be wrong to fit your claims. >>> >>> A 17 second delay from a local station? That's 7 seconds, Rocky. Your >>> CGI claim is even more ludicrous. Is there anything you don't believe >>> other than provable facts? >>> >>>> Don't forget the two jets in Nuke York City can be easily reproduced >>>> with 3D software including the "Disappearing Wing" and the remains >>>> of the Twin Towers do not resemble a collapsed building but a >>>> vaporized building. >>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >>> I really don't know how you could confuse software that's designed to >>> mimic actual physical occurrances with what actually happens but >>> trotting out a completely discredited website with no other sources >>> is enough to show everyone your agenda. >>> >>>> The kooks are the ones that never looked for any inconsistencies >>>> with the 9/11 BULLSHIT. >>> >>> With so many people, including many who would love to prove it wasn't >>> a Gubmint plot, who have pored over this and the exceptonal efforts >>> of those who exposed the culprits, I find your repeated belittling of >>> this to be something a terrorist and propagandist would try. Are you >>> a traitor and a terrorist, Rocky? Which cell are you attached to, >>> murderer? > > Evasions noted. > >> >> Just look at the facts for yourself. > > I asked you for something other than the same silly and much discredited > site you cut and paste every post. I'm still waiting. It would help if it > were credible. > >> The two CGIs flew right into the Twin Towers without slowing down or >> losing parts and for that to happen in real life the Twin Towers would >> have to be a lot softer than birds and I doubt that. > > Ever see a piece of straw that has penetrated a tree after a tornado? > Same principle. > >> And just think for a minute. In a real building collapse what ends up >> on top? > > It's going to vary upon multiple conditions. > >> Certainly not items at the very bottom of the building > > First off, you haven't established why that wouldn't be the case. It is not my fault that you have never built any buildings out of cards. If you had you would know the cards on top stay on top. DUH >> but >> that is what happened so the Twin Towers had to be vaporized before >> they collapsed and what everybody saw is possible with deep >> underground MRR nukes. > > So underground nukes will vaporize the top of a building and leave the > bottem? This is comedy gold. If the deep underground MRR nukes were are off to one side like they were with the Twin Towers then they can't reach the far side so that side will remain standing as proven by: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Boy you are so quick to jump to conclusions no wonder why you are an idiot. >> See: http://www.kooksdaily/DE-Kookified!!!1!!! Oh and you have to fcuk with links too. Wow are you a winner. NOT > It's the same propaganda froma group that may well be terrorists issuing > propaganda. Are you a member of that group? Have you been or the site > vetted by Homeland Security? > > Why do you keep dodging my questions? Why haven't you ever looked at the inconsistencies with 9/11 and don't say you don't see any because all you have to do is open your eyes? The jets in Nuke York City were not consistent with real jets but CGIs and the collapses were not consistent with collapses but vaporized buildings. And even everything done in the two days after 9/11 are consistent with people that were behind 9/11. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 18:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA56185FA5F837stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18> |
| In reply to | #271482 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in news:PMSdnb2_58D2pcbLnZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com: > > "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message > news:XnsA56167E1B57CAstillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >> news:P_CdnZ6G65pOIcfLnZ2dnUU7-cOdnZ2d@giganews.com: >> >>> >>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>> news:XnsA560C998DA1A2stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >>>> news:l7Sdnd0Ljpk9kMfLnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>>>> Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>>> news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>>> news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the >>>>>>>> building was >>>>>>>> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >>>>>>>> propaganda about >>>>>>>> a 757. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 >>>>>>>> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is >>>>>>>> consistent with a ship >>>>>>>> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent >>>>>>>> with CGIs and >>>>>>>> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS >>>>>>>> because the gash in >>>>>>>> the ground was there before 9/11? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were >>>>>>>> hi-jacked at Boston's Logan airport. >>>>>>>> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >>>>>>>> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >>>>>>>> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was >>>>>>>> self destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of >>>>>>>> passenger interference. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. >>>>>>>> So, tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? >>>>>>>> after all, it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not >>>>>>>> a single airport reported the unscheduled landing of an >>>>>>>> airliner full of scared shitless passengers and a compliment of >>>>>>>> demented Muslim fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling >>>>>>>> "Allah Fuckbar", you demented asshole troll. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings >>>>>>> so you can >>>>>>> scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were >>>>>>> either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they >>>>>>> turned bogus in flight. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might >>>>>>> have had the >>>>>>> real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land >>>>>>> in Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those >>>>>>> marks in the ground >>>>>>> were there pre 9/11. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? >>>>>>> And if two >>>>>>> jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily >>>>>>> recreated by 3D >>>>>>> software? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad >>>>>>> movie and that >>>>>>> is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the >>>>>>> remains of the >>>>>>> Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a >>>>>>> vaporized >>>>>>> building. See: >>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jp >>>>>>> eg >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I think >>>>>>> most of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. But >>>>>>> once again, those are irrefutable facts, which raises havoc >>>>>>> among you and your mentally challenged conspiracy peers. >>>>>> >>>>>> I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from both >>>>>> Rocky and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are dumber >>>>>> than Michael Jackson fans. >>>>> >>>>> BULLSHIT. There is no live TV anywhere because they always have >>>>> to have a few seconds delay and in the case of 9/11 it was a 17 >>>>> second delay and that gave them plenty of time to add CGIs to >>>>> their videos. DUH. >>>> >>>> Aside from WNEW and other radio stations located in Manhattan, I >>>> would indeed suggest that there are indeed live stations. You seem >>>> to have forgotten about the public access channels and weather >>>> stations. >>>> >>>> For that matter, there are also satellite and radar images. But >>>> they have to all be wrong to fit your claims. >>>> >>>> A 17 second delay from a local station? That's 7 seconds, Rocky. >>>> Your CGI claim is even more ludicrous. Is there anything you don't >>>> believe other than provable facts? >>>> >>>>> Don't forget the two jets in Nuke York City can be easily >>>>> reproduced with 3D software including the "Disappearing Wing" and >>>>> the remains of the Twin Towers do not resemble a collapsed >>>>> building but a vaporized building. >>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpe >>>>> g >>>> >>>> I really don't know how you could confuse software that's designed >>>> to mimic actual physical occurrances with what actually happens but >>>> trotting out a completely discredited website with no other sources >>>> is enough to show everyone your agenda. >>>> >>>>> The kooks are the ones that never looked for any inconsistencies >>>>> with the 9/11 BULLSHIT. >>>> >>>> With so many people, including many who would love to prove it >>>> wasn't a Gubmint plot, who have pored over this and the exceptonal >>>> efforts of those who exposed the culprits, I find your repeated >>>> belittling of this to be something a terrorist and propagandist >>>> would try. Are you a traitor and a terrorist, Rocky? Which cell are >>>> you attached to, murderer? >> >> Evasions noted. >> >>> >>> Just look at the facts for yourself. >> >> I asked you for something other than the same silly and much >> discredited site you cut and paste every post. I'm still waiting. It >> would help if it were credible. >> >>> The two CGIs flew right into the Twin Towers without slowing down or >>> losing parts and for that to happen in real life the Twin Towers >>> would have to be a lot softer than birds and I doubt that. >> >> Ever see a piece of straw that has penetrated a tree after a tornado? >> Same principle. >> >>> And just think for a minute. In a real building collapse what ends >>> up on top? >> >> It's going to vary upon multiple conditions. >> >>> Certainly not items at the very bottom of the building >> >> First off, you haven't established why that wouldn't be the case. > > It is not my fault that you have never built any buildings out of > cards. If you had you would know the cards on top stay on top. DUH Cards are a different sorty than concrete and steel. I'll bet you don't have airplanes flying into them at 500MPH either. >>> but >>> that is what happened so the Twin Towers had to be vaporized before >>> they collapsed and what everybody saw is possible with deep >>> underground MRR nukes. >> >> So underground nukes will vaporize the top of a building and leave >> the bottem? This is comedy gold. > > If the deep underground MRR nukes were are off to one side like they > were with the Twin Towers No proof of that statement was ever introduced. Invalid argument. > then they can't reach the far side so that > side will remain standing as proven by: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg That's not proof. That's just some idiot(s) playing with Photoshop. > Boy you are so quick to jump to conclusions no wonder why you are an > idiot. Projection noted and ridiculed. >>> See: http://www.kooksdaily/DE-Kookified!!!1!!! > > Oh and you have to fcuk with links too. Wow are you a winner. NOT I'ts a kooky link. I lived up to its expectations. >> It's the same propaganda froma group that may well be terrorists >> issuing propaganda. Are you a member of that group? Have you been or >> the site vetted by Homeland Security? >> >> Why do you keep dodging my questions? > > Why haven't you ever looked at the inconsistencies with 9/11 and don't > say you don't see any because all you have to do is open your eyes? I asked first. Please answer me. > The jets in Nuke York City were not consistent with real jets but CGIs > and the collapses were not consistent with collapses but vaporized > buildings. Please tell me that you have other evidence other than that kok site. > And even everything done in the two days after 9/11 are consistent > with people that were behind 9/11. That's righ. What people? The brave Americans who risked, and sometimes gave their lives, to help those who were in distress? If those are whom you are referring to, you truly are a vile piece of shit. -- Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*, alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895. "God speaks to me, that's why I can read the heavens." - Edmo, clearly losing it. This signature was made by SigChanger. You can find SigChanger at: http://www.phranc.nl/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.conspiracy
csiph-web