Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #269839 > unrolled thread
| Started by | alukenichols24740@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-19 09:50 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-10-20 03:54 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 58 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.conspiracy
Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned alukenichols24740@gmail.com - 2015-10-19 09:50 -0700
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-19 10:24 -0700
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-19 16:22 -0400
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-19 16:14 -0500
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-19 23:49 +0100
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-10-19 17:34 -0700
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 03:54 -0500
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned naazim palan <naazimpalan@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 02:53 -0700
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned warrenbuckley1@gmail.com - 2015-10-20 04:21 -0700
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-20 19:38 +0100
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 20:41 -0500
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-20 16:35 -0500
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-20 22:46 +0100
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-20 17:13 -0500
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-20 23:39 +0100
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-20 19:14 -0400
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-20 19:38 -0400
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-21 06:36 +0100
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned warrenbuckley1@gmail.com - 2015-10-22 12:11 -0700
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-22 23:15 +0100
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 13:22 -0500
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 22:33 +0000
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 17:52 -0500
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 23:48 +0000
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 20:40 -0500
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-26 06:42 +0000
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-20 23:12 +0000
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-21 15:04 -0500
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-22 02:40 +0000
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:00 -0500
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-20 23:01 +0000
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-21 15:15 -0500
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-21 17:54 -0400
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-21 19:45 -0400
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-21 21:07 -0400
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-22 02:55 +0000
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-21 23:05 -0400
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 14:34 +1100
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:34 -0500
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-22 19:09 +0000
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 14:46 -0500
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-23 19:34 -0400
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:45 -0500
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 21:38 -0400
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-22 02:52 +0000
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:12 -0500
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-19 16:13 -0400
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned alukenichols24740@gmail.com - 2015-10-19 13:59 -0700
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-19 17:24 -0400
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 10:19 +1100
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 03:55 -0500
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-20 12:40 -0400
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 20:40 -0500
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-19 16:13 -0500
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 03:54 -0500
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-20 12:38 -0400
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 20:39 -0500
Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 03:54 -0500
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 13:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dvidnUOgN7qFg7DLnZ2dnUU7-eednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #270040 |
<warrenbuckley1@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ccd85efb-0759-4102-ae7e-b7acb8f70381@googlegroups.com... > On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 6:36:50 AM UTC+1, Tony Dragon wrote: >> On 21/10/2015 00:14, Bast wrote: >> > Tony Dragon wrote: >> >> On 20/10/2015 23:13, Rocky wrote: >> >>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> >>> news:n06ckk$v6j$2@dont-email.me... >> >>>> On 20/10/2015 22:35, Rocky wrote: >> >>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> >>>>> news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me... >> >>>>>> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote: >> >>>>>>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message >> >>>>>>> news:MPG.308f1b21f1964ade98c360@news.giganews.com... >> >>>>>>>> In article <georgewk10-5A3FDD.10241219102015@news.toast.net>, >> >>>>>>>> georgewk10 >> >>>>>>>> @yahoo.com says... >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> In article >> >>>>>>>>> <9cd80520-2c74-45d3-be86-3e9e74007fc6@googlegroups.com>, >> >>>>>>>>> alukenichols24740@gmail.com wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump chided W Bush for 9/11 happening on his watch. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Little does he know, that Bush insider, Paul Wolfowitz planned >> >>>>>>>>>> 9/11. His plan, after they summoned the demons that attacked >> >>>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>> three >> >>>>>>>>>> towers, was >> >>>>>>>>>> to implode them. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> The demons attacked, right on time, and then, they "pulled" >> >>>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>> buildings. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> And that, my friend Mr. Trump is the STOMP DOWN truth. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Luke Nichols >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> The curious ones can always do research. into 9/11 >> >>>>>>>>> I's suggest Google; 9/11 Truth >> >>>>>>>>> or >> >>>>>>>>> www.ae9/11truth.org/ >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> And if they have a clue, they will laugh at them. Only the >> >>>>>>>> gullible Trooferish swallow that bullshit. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in everyway >> >>>>>>> and blown >> >>>>>>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of >> >>>>>>> collapses? Rocky >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can >> >>>>>> compare >> >>>>>> them to 911. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like and >> >>>>> that didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for >> >>>>> something >> >>>>> that will not do you any good? >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Were these crashes examines of nuclear demolition, if not your lack >> >>>> of an answer would seem to show you as a liar. >> >>> >> >>> Or maybe all Nuclear Demolitions are mis-labeled the way the >> >>> threeNuclear Demolitions at Ground Zero were. DUH >> >>> >> >>>>> From: "Rocky" >> >>>>> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics >> >>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:09 AM >> >>>>> Subject: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the >> >>>>> ground. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. >> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known >> >>>>> the media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -------------------------------------- >> >>>>> >> >>>>> And do not forget, after NIST saw the following they quit saying >> >>>>> that the Twin Towers were a pancake collapse because the remains of >> >>>>> the Twin Towers >> >>>>> do not resemble a "pancake collapse." DUH >> >>>>> >> >>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >>>>> But the remains of the Twin Towers resemble what you would get if >> >>>>> you >> >>>>> planted something capable of vaporizing them deep under one side of >> >>>>> them and >> >>>>> that can not be any more elementary. >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> What would that 'something' be? Give us a link so we can make a >> >>>> comparison. >> >>>> >> >>>>> The only real magic is the 9/11 hoaxsters knew exactly how big the >> >>>>> nukes had >> >>>>> to be to vaporize up to the locations that people incorrectly think >> >>>>> jets hit >> >>>>> the Twin Towers. >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> What has this to do with my question? >> >>>> >> >>>>> And again, the above photo was obviously taken during the day after >> >>>>> WTC7 was >> >>>>> nuked and there is nobody in it or any cranes either so it had to >> >>>>> be >> >>>>> taken >> >>>>> in the first two days after 9/11 when nobody was allowed into GZ >> >>>>> because of >> >>>>> the radiation. >> >>>> >> >>>> What has this to do with my question? >> >>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Rocky >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> So no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you >> >>>> lied. >> >>> >> >>> It is the other way around. The fact is NIST quit using the term >> >>> "pancake" when they realized the remains of the Twin Towers are >> >>> consistent with a Nuclear Demolition instead. DUH >> >>> >> >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >>> >> >> >> >> Nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it? >> >> >> >>> And I think it is funny that the president was one of the first >> >>> people >> >>> allowed at GZ after 3 nukes were set off there but they had to hurry >> >>> up and get the massive cranes in place so it looked like somebody had >> >>> been working there the two days before Bush showed up but that was >> >>> just another big lie. TV Fakery test runs minutes before live 2nd WTC >> >>> hit? >> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuYe4kZUwLo >> >>> >> >> >> >> Again, nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it? >> >> >> >>> Rocky >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Still no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you >> >> lied. >> >> But keep wriggling, it shows you for what you are. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Has anyone pointed out to you that you "logic" just like Sarah >> > Sweetcheeks >> > ? >> >> Unlikely, even if they could understand what your post meant. >> >> > If anyone looked at your posts and one of hers, they really would >> > wonder >> > who's was who's. >> >> Well a sensible person would not. >> >> > Are you both members of C.U.N.T. ? >> >> Is that your best? >> >> > >> > The fact that you refuse to look at the evidence already provided >> > countless >> > times, does not make anyone else a liar. >> >> I await the evidence that pertains to my question, so far I have not >> seen it, but if you can post it do so. >> I should not be difficult, according to you it has been " provided >> countless times" >> >> > ....It just makes you a fool. >> > >> >> So provide the answer to my question. >> >> > >> > 9/11 was an inside job. >> > http://www.ae911truth.org >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> http://www.avast.com > > > I've not seen their answers, is there something wrong with the newsfeed, > I'm sure they must have answered. I've told T-annoy a long time ago I want to see the questions he had for NIST or the 9/11 Commission so I can be sure he isn't taking sides and he never asked them any questions so he is clearly taking sides.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 22:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n0jl7k$fln$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #270229 |
On 25/10/2015 18:22, Rocky wrote: > <warrenbuckley1@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:ccd85efb-0759-4102-ae7e-b7acb8f70381@googlegroups.com... >> On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 6:36:50 AM UTC+1, Tony Dragon wrote: >>> On 21/10/2015 00:14, Bast wrote: >>>> Tony Dragon wrote: >>>>> On 20/10/2015 23:13, Rocky wrote: >>>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:n06ckk$v6j$2@dont-email.me... >>>>>>> On 20/10/2015 22:35, Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.308f1b21f1964ade98c360@news.giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>> In article <georgewk10-5A3FDD.10241219102015@news.toast.net>, >>>>>>>>>>> georgewk10 >>>>>>>>>>> @yahoo.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In article >>>>>>>>>>>> <9cd80520-2c74-45d3-be86-3e9e74007fc6@googlegroups.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>> alukenichols24740@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump chided W Bush for 9/11 happening on his watch. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Little does he know, that Bush insider, Paul Wolfowitz planned >>>>>>>>>>>>> 9/11. His plan, after they summoned the demons that attacked >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> three >>>>>>>>>>>>> towers, was >>>>>>>>>>>>> to implode them. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The demons attacked, right on time, and then, they "pulled" >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> buildings. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And that, my friend Mr. Trump is the STOMP DOWN truth. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Luke Nichols >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The curious ones can always do research. into 9/11 >>>>>>>>>>>> I's suggest Google; 9/11 Truth >>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>> www.ae9/11truth.org/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And if they have a clue, they will laugh at them. Only the >>>>>>>>>>> gullible Trooferish swallow that bullshit. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in everyway >>>>>>>>>> and blown >>>>>>>>>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of >>>>>>>>>> collapses? Rocky >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can >>>>>>>>> compare >>>>>>>>> them to 911. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like and >>>>>>>> that didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for >>>>>>>> something >>>>>>>> that will not do you any good? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Were these crashes examines of nuclear demolition, if not your lack >>>>>>> of an answer would seem to show you as a liar. >>>>>> >>>>>> Or maybe all Nuclear Demolitions are mis-labeled the way the >>>>>> threeNuclear Demolitions at Ground Zero were. DUH >>>>>> >>>>>>>> From: "Rocky" >>>>>>>> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics >>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:09 AM >>>>>>>> Subject: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the >>>>>>>> ground. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known >>>>>>>> the media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And do not forget, after NIST saw the following they quit saying >>>>>>>> that the Twin Towers were a pancake collapse because the remains of >>>>>>>> the Twin Towers >>>>>>>> do not resemble a "pancake collapse." DUH >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>>>>> But the remains of the Twin Towers resemble what you would get if >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>> planted something capable of vaporizing them deep under one side of >>>>>>>> them and >>>>>>>> that can not be any more elementary. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What would that 'something' be? Give us a link so we can make a >>>>>>> comparison. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The only real magic is the 9/11 hoaxsters knew exactly how big the >>>>>>>> nukes had >>>>>>>> to be to vaporize up to the locations that people incorrectly think >>>>>>>> jets hit >>>>>>>> the Twin Towers. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What has this to do with my question? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And again, the above photo was obviously taken during the day after >>>>>>>> WTC7 was >>>>>>>> nuked and there is nobody in it or any cranes either so it had to >>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>> taken >>>>>>>> in the first two days after 9/11 when nobody was allowed into GZ >>>>>>>> because of >>>>>>>> the radiation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What has this to do with my question? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you >>>>>>> lied. >>>>>> >>>>>> It is the other way around. The fact is NIST quit using the term >>>>>> "pancake" when they realized the remains of the Twin Towers are >>>>>> consistent with a Nuclear Demolition instead. DUH >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it? >>>>> >>>>>> And I think it is funny that the president was one of the first >>>>>> people >>>>>> allowed at GZ after 3 nukes were set off there but they had to hurry >>>>>> up and get the massive cranes in place so it looked like somebody had >>>>>> been working there the two days before Bush showed up but that was >>>>>> just another big lie. TV Fakery test runs minutes before live 2nd WTC >>>>>> hit? >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuYe4kZUwLo >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Again, nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it? >>>>> >>>>>> Rocky >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Still no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you >>>>> lied. >>>>> But keep wriggling, it shows you for what you are. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Has anyone pointed out to you that you "logic" just like Sarah >>>> Sweetcheeks >>>> ? >>> >>> Unlikely, even if they could understand what your post meant. >>> >>>> If anyone looked at your posts and one of hers, they really would >>>> wonder >>>> who's was who's. >>> >>> Well a sensible person would not. >>> >>>> Are you both members of C.U.N.T. ? >>> >>> Is that your best? >>> >>>> >>>> The fact that you refuse to look at the evidence already provided >>>> countless >>>> times, does not make anyone else a liar. >>> >>> I await the evidence that pertains to my question, so far I have not >>> seen it, but if you can post it do so. >>> I should not be difficult, according to you it has been " provided >>> countless times" >>> >>>> ....It just makes you a fool. >>>> >>> >>> So provide the answer to my question. >>> >>>> >>>> 9/11 was an inside job. >>>> http://www.ae911truth.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> --- >>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >>> http://www.avast.com >> >> >> I've not seen their answers, is there something wrong with the newsfeed, >> I'm sure they must have answered. > > I've told T-annoy a long time ago I want to see the questions he had for > NIST or the 9/11 Commission so I can be sure he isn't taking sides and he > never asked them any questions so he is clearly taking sides. > > Rooky I'm sorry, have the naughty people been asking questions that you can't answer? It must be so bad for your ego when you make a statement that you can't back up and somebody notices your lack of answers. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 17:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <AdmdnTr969kUwLDLnZ2dnUU7-a2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #270247 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:n0jl7k$fln$1@dont-email.me... > On 25/10/2015 18:22, Rocky wrote: >> <warrenbuckley1@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:ccd85efb-0759-4102-ae7e-b7acb8f70381@googlegroups.com... >>> On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 6:36:50 AM UTC+1, Tony Dragon wrote: >>>> On 21/10/2015 00:14, Bast wrote: >>>>> Tony Dragon wrote: >>>>>> On 20/10/2015 23:13, Rocky wrote: >>>>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:n06ckk$v6j$2@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>> On 20/10/2015 22:35, Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.308f1b21f1964ade98c360@news.giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <georgewk10-5A3FDD.10241219102015@news.toast.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>> georgewk10 >>>>>>>>>>>> @yahoo.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article >>>>>>>>>>>>> <9cd80520-2c74-45d3-be86-3e9e74007fc6@googlegroups.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> alukenichols24740@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump chided W Bush for 9/11 happening on his watch. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Little does he know, that Bush insider, Paul Wolfowitz >>>>>>>>>>>>>> planned >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9/11. His plan, after they summoned the demons that attacked >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> three >>>>>>>>>>>>>> towers, was >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to implode them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The demons attacked, right on time, and then, they "pulled" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> buildings. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that, my friend Mr. Trump is the STOMP DOWN truth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Luke Nichols >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The curious ones can always do research. into 9/11 >>>>>>>>>>>>> I's suggest Google; 9/11 Truth >>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>> www.ae9/11truth.org/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And if they have a clue, they will laugh at them. Only the >>>>>>>>>>>> gullible Trooferish swallow that bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in >>>>>>>>>>> everyway >>>>>>>>>>> and blown >>>>>>>>>>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of >>>>>>>>>>> collapses? Rocky >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can >>>>>>>>>> compare >>>>>>>>>> them to 911. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> that didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for >>>>>>>>> something >>>>>>>>> that will not do you any good? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Were these crashes examines of nuclear demolition, if not your lack >>>>>>>> of an answer would seem to show you as a liar. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Or maybe all Nuclear Demolitions are mis-labeled the way the >>>>>>> threeNuclear Demolitions at Ground Zero were. DUH >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> From: "Rocky" >>>>>>>>> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics >>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:09 AM >>>>>>>>> Subject: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the >>>>>>>>> ground. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. >>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have >>>>>>>>> known >>>>>>>>> the media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And do not forget, after NIST saw the following they quit saying >>>>>>>>> that the Twin Towers were a pancake collapse because the remains >>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>> the Twin Towers >>>>>>>>> do not resemble a "pancake collapse." DUH >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>>>>>> But the remains of the Twin Towers resemble what you would get if >>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>> planted something capable of vaporizing them deep under one side >>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>> them and >>>>>>>>> that can not be any more elementary. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What would that 'something' be? Give us a link so we can make a >>>>>>>> comparison. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The only real magic is the 9/11 hoaxsters knew exactly how big the >>>>>>>>> nukes had >>>>>>>>> to be to vaporize up to the locations that people incorrectly >>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>> jets hit >>>>>>>>> the Twin Towers. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What has this to do with my question? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And again, the above photo was obviously taken during the day >>>>>>>>> after >>>>>>>>> WTC7 was >>>>>>>>> nuked and there is nobody in it or any cranes either so it had to >>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>> taken >>>>>>>>> in the first two days after 9/11 when nobody was allowed into GZ >>>>>>>>> because of >>>>>>>>> the radiation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What has this to do with my question? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you >>>>>>>> lied. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is the other way around. The fact is NIST quit using the term >>>>>>> "pancake" when they realized the remains of the Twin Towers are >>>>>>> consistent with a Nuclear Demolition instead. DUH >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it? >>>>>> >>>>>>> And I think it is funny that the president was one of the first >>>>>>> people >>>>>>> allowed at GZ after 3 nukes were set off there but they had to hurry >>>>>>> up and get the massive cranes in place so it looked like somebody >>>>>>> had >>>>>>> been working there the two days before Bush showed up but that was >>>>>>> just another big lie. TV Fakery test runs minutes before live 2nd >>>>>>> WTC >>>>>>> hit? >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuYe4kZUwLo >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Again, nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it? >>>>>> >>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Still no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you >>>>>> lied. >>>>>> But keep wriggling, it shows you for what you are. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Has anyone pointed out to you that you "logic" just like Sarah >>>>> Sweetcheeks >>>>> ? >>>> >>>> Unlikely, even if they could understand what your post meant. >>>> >>>>> If anyone looked at your posts and one of hers, they really would >>>>> wonder >>>>> who's was who's. >>>> >>>> Well a sensible person would not. >>>> >>>>> Are you both members of C.U.N.T. ? >>>> >>>> Is that your best? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The fact that you refuse to look at the evidence already provided >>>>> countless >>>>> times, does not make anyone else a liar. >>>> >>>> I await the evidence that pertains to my question, so far I have not >>>> seen it, but if you can post it do so. >>>> I should not be difficult, according to you it has been " provided >>>> countless times" >>>> >>>>> ....It just makes you a fool. >>>>> >>>> >>>> So provide the answer to my question. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> 9/11 was an inside job. >>>>> http://www.ae911truth.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --- >>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >>>> http://www.avast.com >>> >>> >>> I've not seen their answers, is there something wrong with the newsfeed, >>> I'm sure they must have answered. >> >> I've told T-annoy a long time ago I want to see the questions he had for >> NIST or the 9/11 Commission so I can be sure he isn't taking sides and he >> never asked them any questions so he is clearly taking sides. > > I'm sorry, have the naughty people been asking questions that you can't > answer? You work hard at asking the wrong people questions and you know that. Again, let me see any of the questions you had for NIST or the 9/11 Commission about why four jets vanished without a trace and why buildings could collapse, float away and leave next to nothing on the ground. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg BTW this video reminds me of you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGaokcCCjmw
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 23:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n0jpkj$1sd$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #270259 |
On 25/10/2015 22:52, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:n0jl7k$fln$1@dont-email.me... >> On 25/10/2015 18:22, Rocky wrote: >>> <warrenbuckley1@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:ccd85efb-0759-4102-ae7e-b7acb8f70381@googlegroups.com... >>>> On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 6:36:50 AM UTC+1, Tony Dragon wrote: >>>>> On 21/10/2015 00:14, Bast wrote: >>>>>> Tony Dragon wrote: >>>>>>> On 20/10/2015 23:13, Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:n06ckk$v6j$2@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>> On 20/10/2015 22:35, Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.308f1b21f1964ade98c360@news.giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <georgewk10-5A3FDD.10241219102015@news.toast.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> georgewk10 >>>>>>>>>>>>> @yahoo.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <9cd80520-2c74-45d3-be86-3e9e74007fc6@googlegroups.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> alukenichols24740@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump chided W Bush for 9/11 happening on his watch. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Little does he know, that Bush insider, Paul Wolfowitz >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planned >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9/11. His plan, after they summoned the demons that attacked >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> three >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> towers, was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to implode them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The demons attacked, right on time, and then, they "pulled" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buildings. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that, my friend Mr. Trump is the STOMP DOWN truth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Luke Nichols >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The curious ones can always do research. into 9/11 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I's suggest Google; 9/11 Truth >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.ae9/11truth.org/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And if they have a clue, they will laugh at them. Only the >>>>>>>>>>>>> gullible Trooferish swallow that bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in >>>>>>>>>>>> everyway >>>>>>>>>>>> and blown >>>>>>>>>>>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of >>>>>>>>>>>> collapses? Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can >>>>>>>>>>> compare >>>>>>>>>>> them to 911. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like >>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> that didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for >>>>>>>>>> something >>>>>>>>>> that will not do you any good? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Were these crashes examines of nuclear demolition, if not your lack >>>>>>>>> of an answer would seem to show you as a liar. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Or maybe all Nuclear Demolitions are mis-labeled the way the >>>>>>>> threeNuclear Demolitions at Ground Zero were. DUH >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> From: "Rocky" >>>>>>>>>> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:09 AM >>>>>>>>>> Subject: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the >>>>>>>>>> ground. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. >>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have >>>>>>>>>> known >>>>>>>>>> the media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And do not forget, after NIST saw the following they quit saying >>>>>>>>>> that the Twin Towers were a pancake collapse because the remains >>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>> the Twin Towers >>>>>>>>>> do not resemble a "pancake collapse." DUH >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>>>>>>> But the remains of the Twin Towers resemble what you would get if >>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>> planted something capable of vaporizing them deep under one side >>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>> them and >>>>>>>>>> that can not be any more elementary. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What would that 'something' be? Give us a link so we can make a >>>>>>>>> comparison. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The only real magic is the 9/11 hoaxsters knew exactly how big the >>>>>>>>>> nukes had >>>>>>>>>> to be to vaporize up to the locations that people incorrectly >>>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>> jets hit >>>>>>>>>> the Twin Towers. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What has this to do with my question? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And again, the above photo was obviously taken during the day >>>>>>>>>> after >>>>>>>>>> WTC7 was >>>>>>>>>> nuked and there is nobody in it or any cranes either so it had to >>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>> taken >>>>>>>>>> in the first two days after 9/11 when nobody was allowed into GZ >>>>>>>>>> because of >>>>>>>>>> the radiation. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What has this to do with my question? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you >>>>>>>>> lied. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is the other way around. The fact is NIST quit using the term >>>>>>>> "pancake" when they realized the remains of the Twin Towers are >>>>>>>> consistent with a Nuclear Demolition instead. DUH >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And I think it is funny that the president was one of the first >>>>>>>> people >>>>>>>> allowed at GZ after 3 nukes were set off there but they had to hurry >>>>>>>> up and get the massive cranes in place so it looked like somebody >>>>>>>> had >>>>>>>> been working there the two days before Bush showed up but that was >>>>>>>> just another big lie. TV Fakery test runs minutes before live 2nd >>>>>>>> WTC >>>>>>>> hit? >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuYe4kZUwLo >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Again, nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Still no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you >>>>>>> lied. >>>>>>> But keep wriggling, it shows you for what you are. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Has anyone pointed out to you that you "logic" just like Sarah >>>>>> Sweetcheeks >>>>>> ? >>>>> >>>>> Unlikely, even if they could understand what your post meant. >>>>> >>>>>> If anyone looked at your posts and one of hers, they really would >>>>>> wonder >>>>>> who's was who's. >>>>> >>>>> Well a sensible person would not. >>>>> >>>>>> Are you both members of C.U.N.T. ? >>>>> >>>>> Is that your best? >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The fact that you refuse to look at the evidence already provided >>>>>> countless >>>>>> times, does not make anyone else a liar. >>>>> >>>>> I await the evidence that pertains to my question, so far I have not >>>>> seen it, but if you can post it do so. >>>>> I should not be difficult, according to you it has been " provided >>>>> countless times" >>>>> >>>>>> ....It just makes you a fool. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So provide the answer to my question. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 9/11 was an inside job. >>>>>> http://www.ae911truth.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >>>>> http://www.avast.com >>>> >>>> >>>> I've not seen their answers, is there something wrong with the newsfeed, >>>> I'm sure they must have answered. >>> >>> I've told T-annoy a long time ago I want to see the questions he had for >>> NIST or the 9/11 Commission so I can be sure he isn't taking sides and he >>> never asked them any questions so he is clearly taking sides. >> >> I'm sorry, have the naughty people been asking questions that you can't >> answer? > > You work hard at asking the wrong people questions and you know that. > Indeed I am asking questions of someone who can't/wont answer them, why is this? If you truly believe what you post you should have all the answers filled just ready to access. > Again, let me see any of the questions you had for NIST or the 9/11 > Commission about why four jets vanished without a trace and why buildings > could collapse, float away and leave next to nothing on the ground. > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > Evasion yet again noted. > BTW this video reminds me of you: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGaokcCCjmw > > > Oh dear, is that the best you can do, it really shows your lack of conviction for your claims. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 20:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <j66dnbcOvLZYGbDLnZ2dnUU7-VOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #270269 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:n0jpkj$1sd$2@dont-email.me... > On 25/10/2015 22:52, Rocky wrote: >> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message ... >> BTW this video reminds me of you: >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGaokcCCjmw > > Oh dear, is that the best you can do, it really shows your lack of > conviction for your claims. OK, I guess you are right a burping Marmot has more brains than you do because they don't ask stupid questions over and over and over.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 06:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n0khs6$sau$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #270278 |
On 26/10/2015 01:40, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:n0jpkj$1sd$2@dont-email.me... >> On 25/10/2015 22:52, Rocky wrote: >>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > ... >>> BTW this video reminds me of you: >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGaokcCCjmw >> >> Oh dear, is that the best you can do, it really shows your lack of >> conviction for your claims. > > OK, I guess you are right a burping Marmot has more brains than you do > because they don't ask stupid questions over and over and over. > > Evidence of editing/sniping post noted. Evasion noted. Lack of answers yet again noted, --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-20 23:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n06hpq$j2u$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #269930 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >And I think it is funny that the president was one of the first people >allowed at GZ after 3 nukes were set off there but they had to hurry up and >get the massive cranes in place so it looked like somebody had been working >there the two days before Bush showed up but that was just another big lie. Hah! It's funny how you have to change your story after I proved to you that your kookclaim "Nobody except iron workers were allowed into Ground Zero on the third day" was a big fat lie, when I showed you proof that the President himself was there on the third day. So you have to squirm and change your story to account for the fact President Bush was there... What about your other lie? You know, "nobody at all was allowed into Ground Zero the first two days" when I showed you how people were rescued by firefighters the first two days, including those who survived in the North Tower stairwell... Squirm, squirm, squirm... Lying kooktard.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-21 15:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dJGdnZlz576UbbrLnZ2dnUU7-d2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #269936 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:n06hpq$j2u$2@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>And I think it is funny that the president was one of the first people >>allowed at GZ after 3 nukes were set off there but they had to hurry up >>and >>get the massive cranes in place so it looked like somebody had been >>working >>there the two days before Bush showed up but that was just another big >>lie. > > Hah! It's funny how you have to change your story after I proved to you > that your kookclaim "Nobody except iron workers were allowed into Ground > Zero on the third day" was a big fat lie, when I showed you proof that > the President himself was there on the third day. So you have to squirm > and change your story to account for the fact President Bush was there... He certainly didn't stay very long as proven by your own video. DUH > What about your other lie? You know, "nobody at all was allowed into > Ground Zero the first two days" when I showed you how people were rescued > by firefighters the first two days, including those who survived in the > North Tower stairwell... And they were rescued before WTC7 was nuked and even before Ground Zero was given the name Ground Zero becasue of the nukes that had gone of there. Boy you are really digging yourself a hole. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-22 02:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n09iaf$rgg$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #269980 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:n06hpq$j2u$2@pcls7.std.com... >> Hah! It's funny how you have to change your story after I proved to you >> that your kookclaim "Nobody except iron workers were allowed into Ground >> Zero on the third day" was a big fat lie, when I showed you proof that >> the President himself was there on the third day. So you have to squirm >> and change your story to account for the fact President Bush was there... >He certainly didn't stay very long as proven by your own video. DUH K⊙⊙ktard, that doesn't matter. The fact Bush and all the other people were there _at all_ proves that your kookclaim "Nobody except iron workers were allowed into Ground Zero on the third day" was a big fat lie. You've been caught lying yet again, k⊙⊙ktard. >> What about your other lie? You know, "nobody at all was allowed into >> Ground Zero the first two days" when I showed you how people were rescued >> by firefighters the first two days, including those who survived in the >> North Tower stairwell... <snip evasion> K⊙⊙ktard, why won't you talk about how you lied when you kookclaimed "nobody at all was allowed into Ground Zero the first two days"? In addition to those in the North Tower stairwell, rescued about two hours after it collapsed, Pasquale Buzzelli was rescued 3 hours after the collapse, William Jimeno after 13 hours, John McLoughlin after 21 hours and Genelle Guzman after 27 hours, over a day. How could these people be rescued if rescuers weren't even allowed into the site? You lied, kooktard! And you *still* haven't provided any evidence to your kookclaim that radiation was any higher after 9/11 than before! >Boy you are really digging yourself a hole. K⊙⊙ktard, it is you with the shovel, digging away.... <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-22 15:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <TeqdnTPfK8Yn3bTLnZ2dnUU7-VGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #269999 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:n09iaf$rgg$1@pcls7.std.com... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:n06hpq$j2u$2@pcls7.std.com... >> Hah! It's funny how you have to change your story after I proved to you >> that your kookclaim "Nobody except iron workers were allowed into Ground >> Zero on the third day" was a big fat lie, when I showed you proof that >> the President himself was there on the third day. So you have to squirm >> and change your story to account for the fact President Bush was there... >He certainly didn't stay very long as proven by your own video. DUH K??ktard, that doesn't matter. The fact Bush and all the other people were there _at all_ proves that your kookclaim "Nobody except iron workers were allowed into Ground Zero on the third day" was a big fat lie. You've been caught lying yet again, k??ktard. >> What about your other lie? You know, "nobody at all was allowed into >> Ground Zero the first two days" when I showed you how people were rescued >> by firefighters the first two days, including those who survived in the >> North Tower stairwell... <snip evasion> K??ktard, why won't you talk about how you lied when you kookclaimed "nobody at all was allowed into Ground Zero the first two days"? In addition to those in the North Tower stairwell, rescued about two hours after it collapsed, Pasquale Buzzelli was rescued 3 hours after the collapse, William Jimeno after 13 hours, John McLoughlin after 21 hours and Genelle Guzman after 27 hours, over a day. How could these people be rescued if rescuers weren't even allowed into the site? You lied, kooktard! And you *still* haven't provided any evidence to your kookclaim that radiation was any higher after 9/11 than before! >Boy you are really digging yourself a hole. K??ktard, it is you with the shovel, digging away.... <snicker> ========================= You are just too funny. You see very bad CGIs ram into the Twin Towers and you don't call the news media liars? And not only that the CGIs lost wings and skipped across the screen instead of moving like a real jets. You see what was called "collapses" but the buildings fell at a speed that is consistent with a controlled demolition or a nuclear demolition. And you see remains of buildings that only nuclear demolitions can leave so there are no ifs ands buts about it that the only country to nuke another country also nuked themselves on 9/11. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg And above all you never ever saw any real proof that someone besides the Saudis were responsible for 9/11. <G> And do not forget about the 28 pages left out of the 9/11 Commission report and the fact the toasted cars at GZ were there to make some people think nukes were used at GZ. They just were not told that the nukes used at GZ were part of the World Trade Center Demolition scheme that had been in place since they were built. DUH Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-20 23:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n06h3r$j2u$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #269923 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me... >> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote: >>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in everyway and >>> blown >>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of collapses? >>> >> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can compare them >> to 911. >People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like and that >didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for something that will >not do you any good? So, you can't answer Tony's question what a nuclear demolition looks like? Why is that? Is it because there is no such thing?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-21 15:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <7_6dnQ4tHcwCb7rLnZ2dnUU7-XmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #269935 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:n06h3r$j2u$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me... >>> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote: > >>>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in everyway and >>>> blown >>>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of collapses? >>>> >>> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can compare them >>> to 911. > >>People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like and that >>didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for something that will >>not do you any good? > > So, you can't answer Tony's question what a nuclear demolition looks like? > Why is that? Is it because there is no such thing? If you really were smart you would know that a deep underground nuke have a "vaporization range", a spread pattern that can change by the surrounding rock and is the only thing that can leave behind the near total destruction of the Twin Towers in the following: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg And because the jets were not needed to vaporize the Twin Towers since nukes were used for that it is pretty easy to see that the jets were just part of the lies told by a series of corporations bent on throwing the US into endless debt. And real jets do not skip across the sky the way CGIs do. See: "TV Fakery test runs minutes before live 2nd WTC hit?" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuYe4kZUwLo Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-21 17:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op1g2bdaki8jsdgs1iksfnee2pn1t7ffn2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #269981 |
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:15:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >If you really were smart you would know that a deep underground nuke have a >"vaporization range", a spread pattern that can change by the surrounding >rock Roger, you told everyone a month ago that the supposed nukes tunneled their way to the surface before they detonated in the air. How does your previous statement square with your claims now that involve whatever you mean by " surrounding rock " ? >And because the jets were not needed to vaporize the Twin Towers since nukes >were used for that it That is a false premise, Rocky. >is pretty easy to see that the jets were just part of >the lies You keep saying no jets flew into the Twin Towers. Thousands and thousands of New Yorkers who were witnesses to the attack in Manhattan that day want to strangle you and throw you in the river for being so irreverent to the tragedy which touched so many of their lives.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-21 19:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n097vl$l4l$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #269981 |
Rocky wrote: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:n06h3r$j2u$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>> news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me... >>>> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote: >> >>>>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in everyway >>>>> and blown >>>>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of collapses? >>>>> >>>> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can compare >>>> them to 911. >> >>> People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like and >>> that didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for something >>> that will not do you any good? >> >> So, you can't answer Tony's question what a nuclear demolition looks >> like? Why is that? Is it because there is no such thing? > > If you really were smart you would know that a deep underground nuke > have a "vaporization range", a spread pattern that can change by the > surrounding rock and is the only thing that can leave behind the near > total destruction of the Twin Towers in the following: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > And because the jets were not needed to vaporize the Twin Towers since > nukes were used for that it is pretty easy to see that the jets were > just part of the lies told by a series of corporations bent on throwing > the US into endless debt. > > And real jets do not skip across the sky the way CGIs do. See: "TV > Fakery test runs minutes before live 2nd WTC hit?" > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuYe4kZUwLo > > Rocky 100% WTC 9/11 Military Plane Attack Evidence - 12 Witness Reactions https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHHghW4Pg5k Eyewitnesses say there were no passenger jets. But gray unmarked things with no windows. Still seems a cruise type missile would be what the people in the above video are describing. The victims families want and deserve the truth. And to know that those really responsible for 9/11, and the cover-up, are held fully accountable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-21 21:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.309200e0b58b57bc98c369@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #269984 |
In article <n097vl$l4l$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > Rocky wrote: > > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > > news:n06h3r$j2u$1@pcls7.std.com... > >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >> > >>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > >>> news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me... > >>>> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote: > >> > >>>>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in everyway > >>>>> and blown > >>>>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of collapses? > >>>>> > >>>> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can compare > >>>> them to 911. > >> > >>> People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like and > >>> that didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for something > >>> that will not do you any good? > >> > >> So, you can't answer Tony's question what a nuclear demolition looks > >> like? Why is that? Is it because there is no such thing? > > > > If you really were smart you would know that a deep underground nuke > > have a "vaporization range", a spread pattern that can change by the > > surrounding rock and is the only thing that can leave behind the near > > total destruction of the Twin Towers in the following: > > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > > > And because the jets were not needed to vaporize the Twin Towers since > > nukes were used for that it is pretty easy to see that the jets were > > just part of the lies told by a series of corporations bent on throwing > > the US into endless debt. > > > > And real jets do not skip across the sky the way CGIs do. See: "TV > > Fakery test runs minutes before live 2nd WTC hit?" > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuYe4kZUwLo > > > > Rocky > > > > > > 100% WTC 9/11 Military Plane Attack Evidence - 12 Witness Reactions > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHHghW4Pg5k > > Eyewitnesses say there were no passenger jets. But gray unmarked things with > no windows. > > Still seems a cruise type missile would be what the people in the above > video are describing. > > The victims families want and deserve the truth. > And to know that those really responsible for 9/11, and the cover-up, are > held fully accountable. Troofer kOOkvids aren't proof of anything, except your gullibility. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-22 02:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n09j6j$rgg$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #269993 |
BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> writes: >Troofer kOOkvids aren't proof of anything, except your gullibility. Don't you remember, Bast? Your buddy Rocky proved that all kookvids are nothing but lies!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-21 23:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30921c9f2109fd1498c36b@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #270001 |
In article <n09j6j$rgg$3@pcls7.std.com>, moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com says... > > BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> writes: > > >Troofer kOOkvids aren't proof of anything, except your gullibility. > > Don't you remember, Bast? Your buddy Rocky proved that all kookvids are > nothing but lies! It's beyond great when the Troofers prove each other's claims are bullshit. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-22 14:34 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <d7mg2bt835db4oeoh9porqiv4s0udeoagn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #270002 |
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 23:05:57 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote: >In article <n09j6j$rgg$3@pcls7.std.com>, moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com >says... >> >> BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> writes: >> >> >Troofer kOOkvids aren't proof of anything, except your gullibility. >> >> Don't you remember, Bast? Your buddy Rocky proved that all kookvids are >> nothing but lies! > >It's beyond great when the Troofers prove each other's claims are >bullshit. It's even better when the get into a kOOkfight ™ over their conflicting claims. Shill #2 -- "God rest ye merry Truther kooks, let nothing you dismay Remember the Conspiracy that happened on this day The towers were an inside job since Cheney got his way Oh tidings of nonsense and woo, nonsense and woo Oh tidings of nonsense and woo A missile hit the Pentagon, of that you can be sure The other planes were holograms, just check with Michael Moore And tales of nano-thermite dust we'll make the world endure Oh tidings of nonsense and woo, nonsense and woo Oh tidings of nonsense and woo". raven1 11Sep2011
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-22 15:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <D6idnev-xtw61bTLnZ2dnUU7-emdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #270001 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:n09j6j$rgg$3@pcls7.std.com... > BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> writes: > >>Troofer kOOkvids aren't proof of anything, except your gullibility. > > Don't you remember, Bast? Your buddy Rocky proved that all kookvids are > nothing but lies! But you failed to notice people had to be kicked out of GZ after they rescued the people under the vaporization range of a deep underground nuke and after WTC7 was nuked. Besides how in the hell are you going to try to keep a dozen people from being rescued when the people that were trapped had walkie talkies and were talking directly to other First Responders? It is way too obvious that the following is not a "Collapse" and you would know that too if you ever saw a real fire induced collapse. DUH http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Same with all four of the bogus jet stories. You would know we were lied to about them if you ever saw a real crash. Once again, the fact that a CGI skips across the screen and real jets do not, CGIs lose wings and keep flying and CGIs do not lose any parts or speed proves the two jets in Nuke York City were both very bad CGIs on top of that. But what I can't figure out is why you think kerosene has the exact same destructive prosperities as nukes? http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg And you fail to see what a deep underground nuke can do even after someone from alt.conspiracy post videos proving that deep underground nukes do not have to have a flash or an air blast wave. DUH http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-22 19:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n0bc9e$prk$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #269984 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >The victims families want and deserve the truth. >And to know that those really responsible for 9/11, and the cover-up, are >held fully accountable. So why do you tell those people whose loved ones died as passengers on the jets (never to their faces, of course) that they couldn't have died on those jets, because there were no jets? Why do you tell those people whose loved ones died jumping from the towers that they didn't die jumping from the towers, people were throwing things out the windows instead? Why do you tell those people who were rescued from the rubble that they weren't rescued from the rubble, because there were no rescuers allowed on site the first few days? Why do you deny the simple fact that nearly 3,000 people were murdered by 19 crazed radical Muslim terrorists who hijacked four planes and deliberately crashed them, destroying the World Trade Center and damaging the Pentagon?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.conspiracy
csiph-web