Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.conspiracy > #265349 > unrolled thread

911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.

Back to article view | Back to alt.conspiracy

Contents

  911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 09:09 -0500
    Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 10:33 -0500
      Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-27 17:28 -0400
        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:34 -0500
          Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:54 +0000
          Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 18:48 -0500
            Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-28 00:37 -0400
              Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 15:00 -0500
                Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:40 -0500
                  Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:02 -0500
                    Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:01 -0500
                Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-28 21:12 -0400
              Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 16:09 -0500
          Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-28 00:45 -0400
            Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 15:08 -0500
          Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:06 +0100
            Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 00:32 -0400
              Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-15 16:41 -0500
                Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-16 05:26 +0000
                  Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 03:47 -0500
                  Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-16 08:24 -0500
                    Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-16 15:30 +0000
                      Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-16 17:20 -0500
            Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  (list of seven) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 07:19 -0500
              Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (list of seven) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 16:19 +0100
                Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (list of seven) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:04 -0500
    Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:10 +0000
      Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:20 -0500
        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:35 +0000
        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 19:50 -0500
        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:05 +0100
      Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-27 17:31 -0400
        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:56 +0000
          Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 17:09 -0500
            Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 23:07 +0000
              Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  (media edits audio to help with the hoax) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:51 -0500
                Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  (media edits audio to help with the hoax) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:29 +0000
                  Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  (media edits audio to help with the hoax) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:57 -0500
                    Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  (media edits audio to help with the hoax) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 17:41 +0000
                      Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  (media edits audio to help with the hoax) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 13:00 -0500
                        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  (media edits audio to help with the hoax) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 18:23 +0000
                        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 19:32 +0100
                Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 19:32 +0100
                Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  (media edits audio to help with the hoax) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-15 16:33 -0500
                  Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  (media edits audio to help with the hoax) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-16 00:00 -0400
                    Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  (media edits audio to help with the hoax) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 03:47 -0500
                      Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  (media edits audio to help with the hoax) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-17 13:23 -0400
                        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  (media edits audio to help with the hoax) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 14:32 -0500
                  Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-16 05:45 +0000
                    Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-16 08:31 -0500
                      Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-16 15:06 +0000
                        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-16 18:02 +0200
                        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-16 17:44 -0500
            Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 19:46 -0500
    Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:04 -0500
      Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 10:24 -0500
        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 10:23 -0700
        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:13 +0000
          Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:30 -0500
            Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:32 +0000
            Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:55 -0500
        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:40 -0500
          Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:34 -0500
            Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:34 +0000
            Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:55 -0500
    Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.  "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 10:36 -0500
      Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:31 -0500
        Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 11:38 -0500
          Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:24 -0500
      Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:45 -0400

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

#265605 — Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax)

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> BTW I've won a jury trial before 12 to 0 and without an attorney and in case 
> you haven't noticed bullshit like the statement you just made above are not 
> allowed courtrooms.

This has nothing to do with your paranoid delusions about what
happend on 9/11, you raving kook.

The facts are some airliners were hijacked.

Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed
almost 2 hours later.

One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the
western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
that can be detected anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the 
collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon
and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

Everything else is kook babble.

That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble.

That there is missing rubble is kook babble.

That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble.

That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble.

That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear
devices is kook babble.

That there was an EMP is kook babble.

That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not
seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble.

That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything
to do with what happened is kook babble.

That the scene was radioactive is kook babble.

That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima
or Nagasaki is kook babble.

That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear
is kook babble.

That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance 
and still be expected to work is kook babble.

That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear
bombs is kook babble.

That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the
airplanes hit the towers is kook babble.

That all the video was CGI is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the
windows is kook babble.

That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble.

That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion
is kook babble.

There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to
ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble.

Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble.

Rantings about specially treated dirt is kook babble.

Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is
kook babble.

Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble.


<snip remaining kook babble>

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#265609 — Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax)

On 29/08/2015 19:00, Rocky wrote:
> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
> news:sf79bc-vof.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> As usual you have no supporting evidence but I do.
>>
>> The only evidence you have is evidence that you are a delusional,
>> paranoid,
>> raving, lunatic.
>
> OBJECTION
>
> BTW I've won a jury trial before 12 to 0 and without an attorney and in case
> you haven't noticed bullshit like the statement you just made above are not
> allowed courtrooms.
>
> Now try to make a real argument.  ROTFLMAO
>
> Rocky sheeple
>
>

Once again you edit out part of a post, that would indeed be allowed in 
a court.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#265611 — Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax)

On 29/08/2015 16:51, Rocky wrote:
> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
> news:3rh4bc-s6.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> But who asked you to post everything you can prove about the Great 9/11
>>> Hoax?
>>
>> The only "Great 9/11 Hoax" is the insane, idiotic gibberish in
>> your deluded mind, kook.
>
> ROTFLMAO because a lot of people know we were fed a bunch of crap about the
> Pentagon and Pranksville, PA. and the fact that the media edited the sound
> on some of their clips with the Twin Towers prove they were in on the Great
> 9/11 Hoax there too.
>
> Here see for yourself.  There is a clip around 6:02 and then another video
> clip around 6:45 that have the exact same woman screaming.  But both clips
> are from different locations.  See:
>

I hear no scream at 6:45.


> September 11 - UA Flight 175 - compilation from different angles
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKrPhDhalBw
>
> Rocky sheeple
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#269683 — Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax)

"dmaster" <danwojciechowski5@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:c71bb64d-ca8b-47e2-a165-667bfaad5680@googlegroups.com...
On Saturday, August 29, 2015 at 10:49:29 AM UTC-5, Rocky wrote:
...
> September 11 - UA Flight 175 - compilation from different angles
>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKrPhDhalBw
>
> Rocky

=============================

> Symptomatic of Rocky, he links to a video that shows that dozens of 
> different video cameras, including many home video cameras,

BULLSHIT.  Not a single one of the videos taken on 9/11 were from a "home 
camera."  The "home cameras" were all messed up by the multitude of EMPs in 
Nuke York City.

The "Hezarkhani video" that looks like it was shaking all over the place was 
actually on a tripod in a park taken at 200 frames per second and how many 
home cameras in 2001 could shoot that fast?  The perps added the shaking to 
make it harder for those to undo the changes done to the video.

The reason for the 200 frames a second was to screw with the resolution and 
it certainly did because that resolution was so bad it removed the "Moire 
patterns" that should have been in the video with the Twin Towers.  See:

THE NO PLANES MOVIE
( Time indexed to the discussion of the Hezarkhani video )
 https://youtu.be/p1D1C94eE8U?t=7m35s

> along with many witnesses saw the second plane strike. This completely 
> blows the Rocky/Bast/No_Planes nonsense out of the air. Why would Rocky do 
> this? I guess because he is Rocky.

Don't forget there were also a lot of videos taken without the CGIs of the 
jets and when the South Tower was hit by a CGI with no crash dynamics both 
ABC and FOX were interviewing eye witnesses that did not see jets.  <G>

9/11 no planes compilation - interesting!
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw


> I really can't believe that Rocky could be this stupid in real life. I 
> vote he is trolling.

Too bad nothing else explains the following other than deep underground 
nukes:
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

And given that three buildings in Nuke York City were just showing off 
Nuclear Demolitions then the bogus jets were not needed.  All they really 
needed was an adjustment on two of the nukes so they would only vaporize up 
to the alleged impact area so it would screw with everybody's mind except 
those that know how nuclear demoltions work.  <G>

> Dan (Woj...)

The evidence that 9/11 was an inside job is what was left standing of the 
Twin Towers because a "global collapse" would not have left anything 
standing at the very bottom of the Twin Towers.  But we see a staircase from 
WTC1 where over a dozen people survived and we see the walls furthest from 
the underground nukes that were not vaporized to the point they floated 
away.

But a nuclear demolition where the nuke was off to one side of the Twin 
Towers would.  And why would they place the nuke over to one side of the 
Twin Towers?  It appears that was done to try and get rid of the mushroom 
cloud that would have been very obvious if the nuke was right under the Twin 
Towers.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#269691 — Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax)

On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:33:45 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"dmaster" <danwojciechowski5@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:c71bb64d-ca8b-47e2-a165-667bfaad5680@googlegroups.com...
>On Saturday, August 29, 2015 at 10:49:29 AM UTC-5, Rocky wrote:
>...
>> September 11 - UA Flight 175 - compilation from different angles
>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKrPhDhalBw
>>
>> Rocky
>
>=============================
>
>> Symptomatic of Rocky, he links to a video that shows that dozens of 
>> different video cameras, including many home video cameras,
>
>BULLSHIT.  Not a single one of the videos taken on 9/11 were from a "home 
>camera."  

Poor Roger, you delusional twat.  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksYBQZ_jqFY

Filmed by NYU students on a home video camera.

Starting at about 1:33 you see them filming "the jumpers".
At 2:07 the second plane hits.  

One of the girls is on the phone with her parents and says, 
"Another plane just crashed into the other trade center.   A jet, a
jumbo jet. "

How dare you listen to the terror and fear in their voices and claim e
they didn't witness and filmed it.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#269698 — Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax)

On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:18 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:

>On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:33:45 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>"dmaster" <danwojciechowski5@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>>news:c71bb64d-ca8b-47e2-a165-667bfaad5680@googlegroups.com...
>>On Saturday, August 29, 2015 at 10:49:29 AM UTC-5, Rocky wrote:
>>...
>>> September 11 - UA Flight 175 - compilation from different angles
>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKrPhDhalBw
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>
>>=============================
>>
>>> Symptomatic of Rocky, he links to a video that shows that dozens of 
>>> different video cameras, including many home video cameras,
>>
>>BULLSHIT.  Not a single one of the videos taken on 9/11 were from a "home 
>>camera."  
>
>Poor Roger, you delusional twat.  
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksYBQZ_jqFY
>
>Filmed by NYU students on a home video camera.
>
>Starting at about 1:33 you see them filming "the jumpers".
>At 2:07 the second plane hits.  
>
>One of the girls is on the phone with her parents and says, 
>"Another plane just crashed into the other trade center.   A jet, a
>jumbo jet. "
>
>How dare you listen to the terror and fear in their voices and claim e
>they didn't witness and filmed it.  

     He'll claim they were crisis actors.


"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."

Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#269739 — Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax)

On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 03:47:15 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
<compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:18 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:33:45 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"dmaster" <danwojciechowski5@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>>>news:c71bb64d-ca8b-47e2-a165-667bfaad5680@googlegroups.com...
>>>On Saturday, August 29, 2015 at 10:49:29 AM UTC-5, Rocky wrote:
>>>...
>>>> September 11 - UA Flight 175 - compilation from different angles
>>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKrPhDhalBw
>>>>
>>>> Rocky
>>>
>>>=============================
>>>
>>>> Symptomatic of Rocky, he links to a video that shows that dozens of 
>>>> different video cameras, including many home video cameras,
>>>
>>>BULLSHIT.  Not a single one of the videos taken on 9/11 were from a "home 
>>>camera."  
>>
>>Poor Roger, you delusional twat.  
>>
>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksYBQZ_jqFY
>>
>>Filmed by NYU students on a home video camera.
>>
>>Starting at about 1:33 you see them filming "the jumpers".
>>At 2:07 the second plane hits.  
>>
>>One of the girls is on the phone with her parents and says, 
>>"Another plane just crashed into the other trade center.   A jet, a
>>jumbo jet. "
>>
>>How dare you listen to the terror and fear in their voices and claim e
>>they didn't witness and filmed it.  
>
>     He'll claim they were crisis actors.

My son Mike's college roommate here in RI spent most of 9/11 trying to
get in touch with his sister who was in school in NYC that morning.
Apparently she was close to the Twin Towers but I don't know if she
was on campus in college housing or in an apartment.   Bast and Ramjet
Roger Rockhead think no real people witnessed any of what went on that
day.  


>"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
>belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
>
>Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
>on 9/11/01 in
>Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

That is such a great quote.   :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#269746 — Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax)

On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 13:23:04 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:

>On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 03:47:15 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
><compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:18 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:33:45 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"dmaster" <danwojciechowski5@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>>>>news:c71bb64d-ca8b-47e2-a165-667bfaad5680@googlegroups.com...
>>>>On Saturday, August 29, 2015 at 10:49:29 AM UTC-5, Rocky wrote:
>>>>...
>>>>> September 11 - UA Flight 175 - compilation from different angles
>>>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKrPhDhalBw
>>>>>
>>>>> Rocky
>>>>
>>>>=============================
>>>>
>>>>> Symptomatic of Rocky, he links to a video that shows that dozens of 
>>>>> different video cameras, including many home video cameras,
>>>>
>>>>BULLSHIT.  Not a single one of the videos taken on 9/11 were from a "home 
>>>>camera."  
>>>
>>>Poor Roger, you delusional twat.  
>>>
>>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksYBQZ_jqFY
>>>
>>>Filmed by NYU students on a home video camera.
>>>
>>>Starting at about 1:33 you see them filming "the jumpers".
>>>At 2:07 the second plane hits.  
>>>
>>>One of the girls is on the phone with her parents and says, 
>>>"Another plane just crashed into the other trade center.   A jet, a
>>>jumbo jet. "
>>>
>>>How dare you listen to the terror and fear in their voices and claim e
>>>they didn't witness and filmed it.  
>>
>>     He'll claim they were crisis actors.
>
>My son Mike's college roommate here in RI spent most of 9/11 trying to
>get in touch with his sister who was in school in NYC that morning.
>Apparently she was close to the Twin Towers but I don't know if she
>was on campus in college housing or in an apartment.   Bast and Ramjet
>Roger Rockhead think no real people witnessed any of what went on that
>day.  
>

     According to Roger, people only repeated what the phantom crisis
actors said. 
     I must presume Roger thinks everyone is a incapable of being
honest as he is if thousands, maybe millions, of witnesses all
repeated a lie from a small number of crisis actors (which Roger never
proved exited).

>
>>"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
>>belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
>>
>>Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
>>on 9/11/01 in
>>Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
>
>That is such a great quote.   :)

     Eventually every k00k posts something that is worthy of being
quoted. What's great about that one is that Roger explains his
inability to be convinced that his nuke claims are bunk. Even though
much of the evidence used to prove his claims false comes from Roger
himself.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#269695 — Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax)

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"dmaster" <danwojciechowski5@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:c71bb64d-ca8b-47e2-a165-667bfaad5680@googlegroups.com...

>> Symptomatic of Rocky, he links to a video that shows that dozens of 
>> different video cameras, including many home video cameras,

>BULLSHIT.  Not a single one of the videos taken on 9/11 were from a "home 
>camera."  The "home cameras" were all messed up by the multitude of EMPs in 
>Nuke York City.

Now wait a minute, kook.  Didn't you say your imaginary nukes went off
when the towers collapsed?  So your imaginary EMPs would happen 56 minutes
or more after the South Tower was struck?  So what, are you saying that
those EMPs went back in time and destroyed home video cameras almost an
hour (or more!) before your first imaginary nuke went off, so that no home
video camera could have recorded the plane impact?????  Time travelling
EMPs????  Yet those alleged time travelling EMPs not only didn't destroy
commercial video cameras (either when they happened or when those EMPs
time travelled back in time) and weren't even recorded by them, except for
one???  And those EMPs didn't knock all those news and police helicopters
out of the sky, didn't take out the NYC power grid, or do any other EMP
damage whatsoever?

Do you have a kookvid that explains time travelling EMPs?  I normally
don't watch kookvids ever since you proved to everyone that they're all
just lies, but I'll make an exception for time travelling EMPs


Seriously, Rocky, get help.  You are slipping more and more into insanity.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#269705 — Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax)

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:mvq2t8$81v$2@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"dmaster" <danwojciechowski5@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:c71bb64d-ca8b-47e2-a165-667bfaad5680@googlegroups.com...
>
>>> Symptomatic of Rocky, he links to a video that shows that dozens of
>>> different video cameras, including many home video cameras,
>
>>BULLSHIT.  Not a single one of the videos taken on 9/11 were from a "home
>>camera."  The "home cameras" were all messed up by the multitude of EMPs 
>>in
>>Nuke York City.
>
> Now wait a minute, kook.  Didn't you say your imaginary nukes went off
> when the towers collapsed?  So your imaginary EMPs would happen 56 minutes
> or more after the South Tower was struck?

You don't need a nuke to make an EMP you idiot.  But you would need a nuke 
to shake the ground and make an EMP at the exact same time you idiot.

You have to go back to the drawing board because not every EMP is super 
destructive the way you think they should be you idiot.

And again, you are giving underground nukes way too big an emp and you are 
failing to see there are other ways to screw with electronics besides nukes.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#269708 — Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax)

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:mvq2t8$81v$2@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>"dmaster" <danwojciechowski5@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:c71bb64d-ca8b-47e2-a165-667bfaad5680@googlegroups.com...
>>
>>>> Symptomatic of Rocky, he links to a video that shows that dozens of
>>>> different video cameras, including many home video cameras,
>>
>>>BULLSHIT.  Not a single one of the videos taken on 9/11 were from a "home
>>>camera."  The "home cameras" were all messed up by the multitude of EMPs 
>>>in
>>>Nuke York City.
>>
>> Now wait a minute, kook.  Didn't you say your imaginary nukes went off
>> when the towers collapsed?  So your imaginary EMPs would happen 56 minutes
>> or more after the South Tower was struck?

>You don't need a nuke to make an EMP you idiot.  But you would need a nuke 
>to shake the ground and make an EMP at the exact same time you idiot.

So tell us, when did these imaginary EMPs happen?  How many of them?  
What generated these alleged EMPs?  And most importantly, how did these
magic EMPs disable home video cameras selectively, without disabling
commercial TV news cameras, knocking helicopters out of the sky, disabling
the NYC power grid etc. etc.?  Tell us about the time travelling EMPs from
the nukes.  Why did the home video camera of the NYU students work? (the
one Sarah linked to, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksYBQZ_jqFY) Why did
the many other home video cameras work?  Of course show us actual proof of
your claims.  Real proof, not a kookvid, since you proved to us that
kookvids are full of lies.

>You have to go back to the drawing board because not every EMP is super 
>destructive the way you think they should be you idiot.

You have something correct for once,  Only EMPs generated by nukes are
super destructive. Well, maybe the military has non-nuclear super 
destructive EMP weapons, I don't know.

>And again, you are giving underground nukes way too big an emp and you are 
>failing to see there are other ways to screw with electronics besides nukes.

You never did give us any proof that underground nukes produce weak EMPs.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#269711 — Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax)

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Michael Moroney, in <news:mvr3p9$gpu$1@pcls7.std.com> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:

> Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the schizophrenic paranoid-delusional
> woman-stalking truck crashing kook) <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>> news:mvq2t8$81v$2@pcls7.std.com...

>>> Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the schizophrenic paranoid-delusional
>>> woman-stalking truck crashing kook) <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>>>> "dmaster" <danwojciechowski5@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:c71bb64d-ca8b-47e2-a165-667bfaad5680@googlegroups.com...

>>>>> Symptomatic of Rocky, he links to a video that shows that dozens of
>>>>> different video cameras, including many home video cameras,

>>>>BU<SMACKAKOOK!>

Moron. LOL

>>> Now wait a minute, kook.  Didn't you say your imaginary nukes went off
>>> when the towers collapsed?  So your imaginary EMPs would happen 56 minutes
>>> or more after the South Tower was struck?

>> Yo<SMACKAKOOK!>

Moron. LOL

> So tell us, when did these imaginary EMPs happen?  How many of them?  
> What generated these alleged EMPs?  And most importantly, how did these
> magic EMPs disable home video cameras selectively, without disabling
> commercial TV news cameras, knocking helicopters out of the sky, disabling
> the NYC power grid etc. etc.?  Tell us about the time travelling EMPs from
> the nukes.  Why did the home video camera of the NYU students work? (the
> one Sarah linked to, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksYBQZ_jqFY) Why did
> the many other home video cameras work?  Of course show us actual proof of
> your claims.  Real proof, not a kookvid, since you proved to us that
> kookvids are full of lies.

>> Yo<SMACKAKOOK!>

Moron. LOL

> You have something correct for once,  Only EMPs generated by nukes are
> super destructive. Well, maybe the military has non-nuclear super 
> destructive EMP weapons, I don't know.

>> A<SMACKAKOOK!>

Moron. LOL

> You never did give us any proof that underground nukes produce weak EMPs.

He'll also have to contend with the personal camera carried by a
fireman *in* *the* *tower* *before* *and* *as* *it* *collapsed*... no
EMP, no video distortion, nothing... of course, I've posted it before,
and RogerRetard ran from it. Just as he's run from every other proof
that he's a moron.

Message-ID: <65045ff552ac5421078abbe9738295b2@dizum.com>
======================================================
1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of
collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below
the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to
today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that
depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's
*why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al
Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human
history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep
Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep.

2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an
EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a
nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of
the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused
the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would
have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the
immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized
your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for
dozens of miles radius.

3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's
no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been
from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of
radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the
tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights
that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a
nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how
delusional you are.

4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or
anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>).
They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement
weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear
weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation.

5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be
sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people
in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed,
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2
MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were
buried.

6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron
source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay
byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it
decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon
poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger
being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any
sort of nuclear chain reaction.

7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it*
*was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical
support column and *NO* EMP:
======================
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo>
You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column
buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount
of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP.
======================

8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to
survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be
approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature
would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K?

9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a
hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding
rock.

10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic
taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of
satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were
detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects
were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft.

11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent
down to service those nukes (because now that you know the
neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a
periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire
facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the
technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with
"4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area
the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to
admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33
years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960
to 1840 degree heat?

12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>)
that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all
1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the
Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your
kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized"
(your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)?

13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic
signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC
site on 11 Sep 2001?

14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris
kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep
underground, Ko0K?

15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have
tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles
deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC
complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to
detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up
your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which
you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference
was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion
started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The
Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.).

16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes
(MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your
previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3
nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming
under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in
agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is?
While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps
(radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was
primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any
contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in
place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this
*still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed
"EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where
your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly
head again. LOL

17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your
"34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes
(MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually,
your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the
real city was blown up by
1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes
which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground
MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet
and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC
and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the
fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn
out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every
piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's
*proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL

18) Explain how a nuclear weapon wouldn't have nuclear detonation
byproducts with the right nuclear trigger, according to your words
"with the right detonator you could have a 'clean' nuke" (MID:
<43acc7488b179f3bfea83ef7076f92b9@dizum.com>).

19) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID:
<e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of
widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're
off your meds, Roger Wittekind.

20) Now you're saying the Ogallala Aquifer is radioactive (what's that
got to do with the WTC?)... with absolutely no proof... all you have
is the paranoid delusional rantings of other schizophrenics like you.

21) Now you're k'laming that the reason no one is hearing these
devastatingly loud blasts from your "nuclear terrorism era" is because
they're using magical "Hushaboom technology" (your words) to silence
the nukes.

Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back
on your meds, you delusional loon.
======================================================

Roger Wittekind is a moron. LOL

-- 

Roger T.E. Wittekind
PO Box 471
167 40th Avenue
East Moline, IL 61244
309-755-6374
309-755-6394

Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East
Moline, IL.

Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just
as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID:
<e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of
widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're
off your meds, Roget Wittekind.

I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're
now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator"
that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no
EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon
proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind.

J) To explain away the lack of any evidence of your k'lame of a
"nuclear terrorism era", your broken brain has conceived that your
magical nukes are employing "Hushaboom technology" (your words) to
silence them.

K) Your broken brain has now stated (MID:
<YtWdnQvC1PTFNWjInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>) that "liquid freon in
the air conditioners helped to turn the nuke into a themo [sic]
nuclear bomb" (your words). Complete and utter nonsense from your
thoroughly broken schizophrenic brain, Roger.

L) In further expanding your delusion, your broken brain has k'lamed
that the reason for the WTC Memorial Lights is to cover up Cherenkov
radiation at the WTC site as a result of a nuclear detonation, kook
blather which I utterly destroy here: MID:
<1f304ece6ae3cd30c1bee10ad300b720@dizum.com> by proving that Cherenkov
radiation in air can only happen with highly energetic beta radiation;
that beta particles due to nuclear fission aren't energetic enough to
cause Cherenkov radiation in air; and that even with beta particles of
maximum possible energy, the Cherenkov radiation in air would only
extend ~2 meters above the ground. That's not taking into account that
the WTC Memorial Lights are currently at the *top* of the 7-story
Battery Parking Garage on Morris Street and are lit only once a year
on 11 Sep. Before the new Goldman Sachs building was built, the lights
were in vacant lot 26 on West Side Highway near the WTC site (on which
the new Goldman Sachs building now sits). They were *never* at the WTC
site. Moron. LOL

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Moron. LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#269717 — Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax)

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:mvr3p9$gpu$1@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>news:mvq2t8$81v$2@pcls7.std.com...
>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>
>>>>"dmaster" <danwojciechowski5@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:c71bb64d-ca8b-47e2-a165-667bfaad5680@googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>>> Symptomatic of Rocky, he links to a video that shows that dozens of
>>>>> different video cameras, including many home video cameras,
>>>
>>>>BULLSHIT.  Not a single one of the videos taken on 9/11 were from a 
>>>>"home
>>>>camera."  The "home cameras" were all messed up by the multitude of EMPs
>>>>in
>>>>Nuke York City.
>>>
>>> Now wait a minute, kook.  Didn't you say your imaginary nukes went off
>>> when the towers collapsed?  So your imaginary EMPs would happen 56 
>>> minutes
>>> or more after the South Tower was struck?
>
>>You don't need a nuke to make an EMP you idiot.  But you would need a nuke
>>to shake the ground and make an EMP at the exact same time you idiot.
>
> So tell us, when did these imaginary EMPs happen?

Now you are making me repeat myself.  It was in the video recorded by WCBS 
in Nuke York City and FFN counted a whole bunch of them but not all of them 
had to be done by nukes and you have got to get it through your head that 
not every EMP is super destructive or the US would go black every time there 
was a lightening strike.

ROTFLMAO because your trick with throwing out small EMPs is the exact same 
trick NIST used to throw out the possibility of a NUKE.  NIST claimed that 
the only thing that could bring down WTC7 was RDX and the blast would have 
had to be so loud that someone should have heard it.

Fact is people did hear the blast when WTC7 was nuked but it was so far 
underground it didn't make a lot of noise and one person even saw the top of 
WTC7 shake and that is consistent with the nuke that leveled WTC1.

Don't forget, not only does the following photo prove the Twin Towers were 
nuked but it was also taken during a time when GZ was off limits to 
everybody because the radiation at GZ was so bad the first two days nobody 
was allowed in there.  <G>
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg


> You never did give us any proof that underground nukes produce weak EMPs.

Obviously people think underground nukes don't make an EMP at all but if 
that were true then nothing explains the timing of the Electronic disruption 
recorded by  an AM receiver operated by WCBS in Nuke York City.

The facts remain.  All that was needed to pull of the great 9/11 hoax was 
underground nukes setup to vaporize up to a certain floor on the Twin Towers 
and a CGI tied to napalm bombs to set what floors the nukes would vaporize 
up to.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

It is all too simple especially when you notice that the only person that 
could recreate the disappearing wing of the alleged Flight 175 did it was 3D 
software.

9/11 was a great big hoax and the war on terror is just a screen play 
written by people in our own government and don't forget an alleged 
"Kerosene Collapse" does not explain the following or NIST would have dealt 
with that issue years ago but instead all NIST did was quit using the term 
"Pancake Collapse."
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#265420

On 8/27/2015 5:09 PM, Rocky wrote:
> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
> news:ikd4bc-i1t.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>
>> Nothing
>
> But who who asked you you to post post everything you you can prove about the Great 9/11
> Ko0kx?
>
> --------  OP follows Hillary -------------
>
> 911 BrashPhysicks REAL plane hips bldg/ falls to the ground.
>   https://www.yourBoobs.com/watch?v=ER6ZfubarQUWvDFs
>
> Two bad CGIs do fall to the ground and everybody kinda shoulda woulda have known the
> media, Batman, flew two CGIs into the Twin Tomers.
>
> Roc-iky
>

no, dont mess with the guys name, he will put you on his shitlist, and 
golly we dont want that now do we after all he is just makeing stuff up 
about the twin tower, how about making stuff up about Hillary? like she 
is stuffed and rolls around on a platform with rollers, or she should be 
stuffed, or she planted a mini nuke and blew up the WTC and got a brain 
dead dose of radiation........

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#265424

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:09:44 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>
>Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known the 
>media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.

     Where to begin. 
     I'll try to dumb this down to a level you'll be able to
understand. I've not enjoyed any success in reaching down to your
level in the past, but I'm ever the optimist.
     A four engine turboprop won't reach the same speed as a jet
airliner. As such, there would never be the same inertia.
     The plane had just taken off, so it would not have been at max
speed. This further decreased the inertia present.
     I understand you have a learning disability, but it can't be as
severe as you're presenting. You're acting, right?
     Speak to a mental health care professional about your OBSESSION
with alt.astronomy. Outside of your well documented delusions,
astronomy had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#265465

"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:jncvtapimb8di87644q9to9qidu5gskuil@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:09:44 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>>
>>Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known the
>>media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.
>
>     Where to begin.

That is simple by finding out what the thickness was for the steel that the 
CGIs flew right through without slowing down.

I've seen quite a few places that talk about the thickness of the main 
support columns but not many say what the perimeter walls were probably 
because if that data were readily available it would help prove someone flew 
two CGIs into the Twin Towers.  DUH.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#265478

Rocky wrote:
> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:jncvtapimb8di87644q9to9qidu5gskuil@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:09:44 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>>> 
>>> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known
>>> the media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.
>> 
>>     Where to begin.
> 
> That is simple by finding out what the thickness was for the steel
> that the CGIs flew right through without slowing down.
> 
> I've seen quite a few places that talk about the thickness of the main
> support columns but not many say what the perimeter walls were
> probably because if that data were readily available it would help
> prove someone flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.  DUH.
> 
> Rocky

what does it matter now

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#265486

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> I've seen quite a few places that talk about the thickness of the main 
> support columns but not many say what the perimeter walls were probably 
> because if that data were readily available it would help prove someone flew 
> two CGIs into the Twin Towers.  DUH.

The perimeter walls were like most such tall buildings, mostly glass,
you raving lunatic.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#265569

<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
news:nuk6bc-427.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> I've seen quite a few places that talk about the thickness of the main
>> support columns but not many say what the perimeter walls were probably
>> because if that data were readily available it would help prove someone 
>> flew
>> two CGIs into the Twin Towers.  DUH.
>
> The perimeter walls were like most such tall buildings, mostly glass,
> you raving lunatic.

Then what held both ends of the trusses up you idiot?

Don't forget the trusses went from the core columns to the perimeter walls 
and they clearly were not built to only be supported by the internal support 
columns.

You really need to watch those videos that prove NIST was full of bullshit 
because they do a great job at showing that Towers were a lot stronger than 
the media wants you to believe now.  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#265583

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
> news:nuk6bc-427.ln1@mail.specsol.com...

>> The perimeter walls were like most such tall buildings, mostly glass,
>> you raving lunatic.
> 
> Then what held both ends of the trusses up you idiot?

Not very much, you bat shit crazy, delusional, parnoid, kook.

<snip remaining babbling kook drool>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.conspiracy

csiph-web