Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #268662 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-29 09:53 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-10-04 19:10 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 352 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.conspiracy
The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-29 09:53 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 11:27 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 11:38 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 17:24 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 13:46 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 18:23 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 14:47 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 14:48 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-29 17:23 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 23:05 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 00:18 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 19:17 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 05:02 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 08:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:05 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 15:21 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 22:55 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 14:20 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 19:20 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 16:00 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 17:48 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:06 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-02 09:58 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 12:21 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 23:31 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:06 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-02 10:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:05 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 05:42 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 03:47 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-03 06:27 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:42 -0500
Re: Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-03 05:33 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 22:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 08:58 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-04 19:33 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 16:30 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 19:49 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 04:00 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 04:19 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 14:12 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 10:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 16:12 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 11:41 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 18:00 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 13:25 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-05 21:41 +0100
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 10:05 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 12:34 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 17:19 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 20:12 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 21:12 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 11:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-06 15:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 16:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 00:45 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 10:25 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 16:09 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 17:45 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-08 03:43 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-08 15:11 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-08 16:46 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 20:19 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-09 20:09 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 04:38 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-10 10:59 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-10 20:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-10 00:57 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-10-09 19:18 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-10 11:22 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-07 09:40 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 14:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 18:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 00:28 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 17:05 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-07 16:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 20:43 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 09:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 04:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-06 15:59 +0200
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 11:16 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 13:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 14:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-07 05:58 +0200
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 15:58 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 17:28 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 16:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 18:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 02:21 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-06 02:29 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 18:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 18:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-10-07 06:41 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-07 10:28 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 16:09 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 18:40 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 00:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-04 19:54 +0100
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 11:00 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-03 19:27 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-03 15:00 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-04 18:07 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 20:28 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 03:24 +0000
Re: Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-04 04:39 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 18:07 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 13:36 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 17:21 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:22 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 14:41 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 18:51 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 19:08 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 09:18 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 09:32 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 19:02 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 09:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 07:13 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 13:20 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-30 13:15 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 16:22 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 15:16 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 17:52 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 23:34 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 17:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 22:54 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 22:16 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-10-01 20:12 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 23:43 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 01:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 05:47 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 17:33 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 09:35 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 21:38 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-10-02 20:03 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 01:10 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-02 04:35 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 17:21 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 19:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 20:33 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 19:34 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 21:30 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 22:01 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 22:33 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 19:57 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 00:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 00:06 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 01:45 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 00:51 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 02:07 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 02:02 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:45 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 06:11 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 15:20 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 12:30 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:06 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 15:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 12:27 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 18:28 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:06 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW # 10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 15:16 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 12:26 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW and Checkmate #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 15:56 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 13:05 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 16:12 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 13:18 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW # 10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 16:21 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 16:22 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 13:30 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 16:18 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 16:45 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 17:02 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 17:24 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 18:05 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 19:02 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 19:09 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 19:18 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 20:36 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 21:06 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 21:43 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 00:52 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-30 23:09 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2015-09-30 23:24 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 02:05 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 02:11 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 02:08 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 15:14 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:06 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 21:41 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. buZZard DoW #7 <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-02 21:46 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. S¡r¡ Crews <siri.cruise@imf.gov> - 2015-10-02 19:53 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. buZZard DoW #7 <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-02 22:56 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 22:00 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 16:48 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 02:25 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 18:12 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 19:07 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 23:47 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 21:09 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 21:44 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 01:04 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 15:46 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 18:25 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:45 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-30 22:34 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 00:08 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-01 10:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-03 09:02 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:46 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:42 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:08 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:05 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 19:51 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 00:26 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 17:32 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 21:33 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 22:15 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 22:39 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 04:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 17:30 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 09:34 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 21:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 21:49 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 22:04 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:41 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-03 19:56 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 20:05 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 15:45 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 16:00 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 17:26 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-04 07:38 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-04 09:48 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-10-04 07:34 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-04 11:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-10-04 09:28 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 19:09 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-05 10:54 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:54 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-04 07:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:51 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 02:56 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 23:08 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-30 22:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 23:00 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-01 10:11 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 12:29 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-02 10:03 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 18:05 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:29 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 16:13 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 11:07 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 18:58 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 22:56 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-09 00:25 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-10-09 02:31 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-09 10:47 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:45 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:23 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 16:19 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 20:59 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 09:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:05 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 15:59 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 08:03 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 04:08 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 17:09 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 20:39 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 22:58 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-09 00:28 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 04:38 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-09 10:50 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 21:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-09 10:42 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 04:38 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 00:24 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 18:47 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 09:53 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 07:09 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 13:29 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 14:55 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 08:12 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 11:24 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 21:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 09:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 09:16 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:14 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:04 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 22:43 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 04:19 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 14:30 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:40 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 21:00 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 23:27 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 13:35 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 14:54 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-30 13:19 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 16:24 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 22:46 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:02 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 04:17 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:37 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 18:35 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 01:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-02 14:41 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-02 10:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-02 17:34 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-02 20:34 +0200
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-02 19:43 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 17:09 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:11 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:04 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:45 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:23 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 23:07 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 00:19 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 08:27 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-30 00:34 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:32 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 21:03 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 17:36 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 10:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:18 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:23 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 10:15 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-30 13:02 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-29 19:54 +0100
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2015-10-03 17:56 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 20:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2015-10-04 10:49 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 19:10 -0500
Page 17 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 Next page →
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-01 18:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <c7dr0b9n5mntb9li5s677sqju66iriumlv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #268886 |
On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:37:39 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >Sarah, do you mean 20 minutes from the first attack or 20 minutes from when >the 9/11 Commission says a 757 struck the Pentagon since the times are about >6 minutes apart. > >And don't give me any crap How about I don't give you anything at all ? >Rocky >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 04:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9ais0bd86ogl56d4j0em4fdbii2j9qbft7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #268900 |
On Thu, 01 Oct 2015 18:35:14 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:
>On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:37:39 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Sarah, do you mean 20 minutes from the first attack or 20 minutes from when
>>the 9/11 Commission says a 757 struck the Pentagon since the times are about
>>6 minutes apart.
>>
>>And don't give me any crap
>
>How about I don't give you anything at all ?
>
I've taken away the direct attention I give to Rocky. If everyone
were to do so, he'd probably cry.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 01:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <0u4s0b1umt70jkqdaraj80mmbvpiv94nnp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #268886 |
>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:muic4a$4mb$2@pcls7.std.com... >> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: >> >>>On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:16:24 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>>>Ok Sarah so now you are tying to say he witnessed the AA plane. >> >>>That's what I've said all along. He saw the plane hit the Pentagon. >> >> Wow. How much did he see, a good view of the whole thing? If so, did he >> testify in a deposition or anything about what he saw? Did he immediately >> know it was an airliner? He said the plane came in very fast and low. Yes, he knew immediately it was a civilian airliner. I asked him about any deposition and he said it wasn't necessary. He was in Naval Intelligence. He's not going to lie. Besides thousands of people traveling along the roads near the Pentagon saw it as well. Only the mentally deranged think anything besides a plane hit the Pentagon. >> Flight 77 has always been a mystery to me since there are no videos of >> its crash. >> >> My daughter has a friend whose mother, a flight attendant, was supposed to >> be on Flight 11, but swapped with another flight attendant. Her daughter >> was named after that flight attendant. Oh wow. I remember the story of the two Flight Attendants. I live in RI. David Angell a native Rhode Islander and the producer of TV's Cheers, Wings and Frasier died on Flight 11 along with his wife and the others on the plane. >>>I've also said he missed by 20 minutes being killed himself because he >>>was due to attend the 10:00 AM briefing in the CNO-IP. >> >> Wow again. When you're young you take every day for granted. His close call ended it for us. Every day I'm thankful he's still with me. So many many people were not as fortunate as we were. Cheers, Sarah
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 14:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mum53f$bbc$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #268935 |
Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:muic4a$4mb$2@pcls7.std.com... >>>>That's what I've said all along. He saw the plane hit the Pentagon. >>> >>> Wow. How much did he see, a good view of the whole thing? If so, did he >>> testify in a deposition or anything about what he saw? Did he immediately >>> know it was an airliner? >He said the plane came in very fast and low. Yes, he knew >immediately it was a civilian airliner. I asked him about any >deposition and he said it wasn't necessary. He was in Naval >Intelligence. He's not going to lie. Besides thousands of people >traveling along the roads near the Pentagon saw it as well. Only the >mentally deranged think anything besides a plane hit the Pentagon. To me, there seems to be some sort of disinformation campaign to try to redefine the history of 9/11 in the minds of Americans by repeatedly planting seeds of doubt. I'm not talking about the schizophrenic babbling of the likes of Rocky, but whoever is producing slick web pages and numerous multi-hour Youtube videos with carefully misleading video clips designed to fool the average viewer. The likes of Rocky lap these up and do their dirty work by kooking about them. Who is behind all that, and why, I haven't figured out yet. Anyway, that's my conspiracy theory, and I am sticking to it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 10:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8uOdnW2D8s5lOJPLnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #268957 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mum53f$bbc$1@pcls7.std.com... > Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: > >>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>news:muic4a$4mb$2@pcls7.std.com... > >>>>>That's what I've said all along. He saw the plane hit the Pentagon. >>>> >>>> Wow. How much did he see, a good view of the whole thing? If so, did >>>> he >>>> testify in a deposition or anything about what he saw? Did he >>>> immediately >>>> know it was an airliner? > >>He said the plane came in very fast and low. Yes, he knew >>immediately it was a civilian airliner. I asked him about any >>deposition and he said it wasn't necessary. He was in Naval >>Intelligence. He's not going to lie. Besides thousands of people >>traveling along the roads near the Pentagon saw it as well. Only the >>mentally deranged think anything besides a plane hit the Pentagon. > > To me, there seems to be some sort of disinformation campaign to try to > redefine the history of 9/11 in the minds of Americans by repeatedly > planting seeds of doubt. I'm not talking about the schizophrenic babbling > of the likes of Rocky, but whoever is producing slick web pages and > numerous multi-hour Youtube videos with carefully misleading video clips > designed to fool the average viewer. The likes of Rocky lap these up and > do their dirty work by kooking about them. Who is behind all that, and > why, I haven't figured out yet. Anyway, that's my conspiracy theory, and > I am sticking to it. And I'm sticking to what I heard on CNN on 9/11/01 and you can hear it yourself here: Pentagon CNN Jamie McIntyre https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ia7bS_uKilI Plus the fact there were multiple attacks on the Pentagon made it impossible for The 9/11 Commission to get the time of the first attack tied to a 757 since the first attack on the Pentagon was not caused by a 757. <G> And it is possible that the attack on the Pentagon was going to be blamed in Flight 93 but when things went wrong with the real Flight 93 the Hoaxsters had to change their plans a little bit but they ended up screwing up their hoax in the process. More on the Pentagon fallacy can be found at: Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw Because of the screw ups at Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon it is easy to see that the two CGIs in Nuke York City were very very cheap CGIs.. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 17:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mumf82$g0u$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #268959 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> Who is behind all that, and >> why, I haven't figured out yet. Anyway, that's my conspiracy theory, and >> I am sticking to it. >And I'm sticking to what I heard on CNN on 9/11/01 and you can hear it >yourself here: >Pentagon CNN Jamie McIntyre Since there is no reason to watch that video, because you already proved to us that all kookvids are lies, I won't. But I will guess what the lie is. McIntyre says "...there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon" and the kooktards say "See? No plane hit the Pentagon!" But McIntyre immediately continues how there are many small pieces of plane, just no big pieces like tails, a fuselage etc., plus the plane went _into_ the Pentagon, not _near_ it. Never mind the thousands of people who saw the plane go into the building. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0109/11/bn.35.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 20:34 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ddd7d43fe2780d5ea26871cb05e425ab@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #268959 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the schizophrenic paranoid-delusional
woman-stalking truck crashing kook), in
<news:8uOdnW2D8s5lOJPLnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:
> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
> news:mum53f$bbc$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes:
>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:muic4a$4mb$2@pcls7.std.com...
>>>>>> That's what I've said all along. He saw the plane hit the Pentagon.
>>>>> Wow. How much did he see, a good view of the whole thing? If so, did
>>>>> he testify in a deposition or anything about what he saw? Did he
>>>>> immediately know it was an airliner?
>>> He said the plane came in very fast and low. Yes, he knew
>>> immediately it was a civilian airliner. I asked him about any
>>> deposition and he said it wasn't necessary. He was in Naval
>>> Intelligence. He's not going to lie. Besides thousands of people
>>> traveling along the roads near the Pentagon saw it as well. Only the
>>> mentally deranged think anything besides a plane hit the Pentagon.
>> To me, there seems to be some sort of disinformation campaign to try to
>> redefine the history of 9/11 in the minds of Americans by repeatedly
>> planting seeds of doubt. I'm not talking about the schizophrenic babbling
>> of the likes of Rocky, but whoever is producing slick web pages and
>> numerous multi-hour Youtube videos with carefully misleading video clips
>> designed to fool the average viewer. The likes of Rocky lap these up and
>> do their dirty work by kooking about them. Who is behind all that, and
>> why, I haven't figured out yet. Anyway, that's my conspiracy theory, and
>> I am sticking to it.
It's an attempt at antisemitism. They're trying to claim that Israel
was behind the attacks. Guess who doesn't want the US to support
Israel? Yeah, the liberals... why do you think Obama bowed low to a
Muslim king, and his administration allowed Iran to police itself as
regards their nuclear program, with a {wink, wink} as regards not
nuking Israel, Iran's stated goal for their nuclear program?
Of course, the fact that Israel was spying in the US to benefit the US
completely demolishes their antisemitism:
Message-ID: <a2332d399c982cfa032b7deeb36e7004@dizum.com>
========================================================
> "The dancing Jews
They weren't dancing, you moron. They've testified that they were very
somber when the attacks took place. The woman who reported them said
that, but what she witnessed was the men lamenting the fact that the
towelheaded camelfuckers had perpetrated such an attack, despite
Israel (along with several other countries) having warned the US,
including giving the names of the perpetrators long before the
completely preventable attacks... how do you think the US was able to
publicize the names of the hijackers just a couple days afterward,
when it would have taken at least a few weeks to dig back through
flight passenger data and eliminate everyone who had no motive by
interviewing friends and family? Because they already had those names.
You moron. LOL
> were there, in New York on 11 September 2001.
Three were Mossad agents who knew in advance of the attack... Israel
is in the Middle East, after all, and has extensive spying operations
in Arab countries. The fact that Israel knew about the attack doesn't
mean they contributed to the attack. The most you've got is that
Israel didn't warn the US about the attack beforehand... except Israel
*did* try to warn the US... and the US *ignored* those warnings. In
fact, *several* countries warned the US about the impending attacks...
Afghanistan, Argentina, Britain, Cayman Islands, Egypt, France,
Germany, Israel, Italy, Jordan, Morocco, and Russia.
Israel was warned by Germany. Germany learned about the impending
attack (including full details) via the Echelon spy satellite network
which is partly based in Germany.
<http://www.historycommons.org/essay.jsp?article=essaytheytriedtowarnus>
In June 2001, German intelligence warned the US, Britain, and Israel
that Middle Eastern terrorists were planning to hijack commercial
aircraft and use them as weapons to attack “American and Israeli
symbols which stand out.” Within the American intelligence community,
“the warnings were taken seriously and surveillance intensified” but
“there was disagreement on how such terrorist attacks could be
prevented.” This warning came from Echelon, a spy satellite network
that is partly based in Germany. [Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung,
9/11/01, Washington Post, 9/14/01]
Israel then tried to warn the CIA, to no avail. Their warnings were
taken seriously but nothing was done because the CIA didn't know how
to prevent such an attack.
<http://www.historycommons.org/essay.jsp?article=essaytheytriedtowarnus>
In October 2002, the story broke in Europe and Israel that on August
23, 2001, the Mossad had given the CIA a list of 19 terrorists living
in the US. The Mossad had said that the terrorists appeared to be
planning to carry out an attack in the near future. It is unknown if
these are the same 19 names as the actual hijackers, or if the number
is a coincidence. However, the four names on the list that are known
are names of the 9/11 hijackers: Nawaf Alhazmi, Khalid Almihdhar,
Marwan Alshehhi, and Mohamed Atta. [Die Zeit, 10/1/02, Der Spiegel,
10/1/02, BBC, 10/2/02, Ha’aretz, 10/3/02] These are also probably the
four most important of the hijackers (and two of the pilots). From
them, there were many connections to the others. The CIA had already
been monitoring three of them overseas the year before, and two,
Alhazmi and Almihdhar, were put on a watch list the same day the
Mossad gave this warning. [AFP, 9/22/01, Berliner Zeitung, 9/24/01,
Observer, 9/30/01, New York Times, 9/21/02]
So yeah, Mossad was here in the US performing spying operations... but
not to hurt the US, they were here to *help* the US. We are, after
all, their greatest ally.
Why do you think the Mossad agents were allowed to go back home to
Israel with no charges brought against them, you fucking loon? Because
the US realized they were here spying on the *real* terrorists, the
radical Islamists who carried out the WTC attacks.
And yet again, reality shits all over your delusion. LOL
Kook. LOL
========================================================
> And I'm sticking to what I heard on CNN on 9/11/01 and you can hear it
> yourself here:
>
> Pentagon CNN Jamie McIntyre
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ia7bS_uKilI
You moron, he was responding to a question about whether any planes
had crash landed near the Pentagon, because they weren't sure whether
a plane had crashed nearby and a chunk of plane had smacked into the
Pentagon from that crash.
<http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0109/11/bn.35.html>
========================================================
"WOODRUFF: Jamie, Aaron was talking earlier -- or one of our
correspondence was talking earlier -- I think -- actually, it was Bob
Franken -- with an eyewitness who said it appeared that that Boeing
757, the American jet, American Airline jet, landed short of the
Pentagon.
Can you give us any better idea of how much of the plane actually
impacted the building? "
MCINTYRE: You know, it might have appeared that way, but from my
close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed
anywhere near (note: as opposed to crashing into) the Pentagon. The
only site is the actual site of the building that's crashed in, and as
I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that
you can pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing
sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around, which would
indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon
and then caused the side to collapse.
========================================================
You'll note he states that a plane *did* crash into the Pentagon, but
he saw no large pieces *outside* the Pentagon... that's not to say
large pieces didn't exist, just that he saw none outside the
Pentagon... which is logical, the plane was going so fast it punched
through the wall of the Pentagon. So his statement was more about the
force of the plane crashing into the side of the Pentagon, not him
stating his belief that no plane had crashed into the side of the
Pentagon.
Of course, McIntyre also said:
<http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0109/11/bn.35.html>
========================================================
A short -- a while ago I walked right up next to the building,
firefighters were still trying to put the blaze. The fire, by the way,
is still burning in some parts of the Pentagon. And I took a look at
the huge gaping hole that's in the side of the Pentagon in an area of
the Pentagon that has been recently renovated, part of a multibillion
dollar renovation program here at the Pentagon. I could see parts of
the airplane that crashed into the building, very small pieces of the
plane on the heliport outside the building. The biggest piece I saw
was about three feet long, it was silver and had been painted green
and red, but I could not see any identifying markings on the plane. I
also saw a large piece of shattered glass. It appeared to be a cockpit
windshield or other window from the plane.
========================================================
Moron. LOL
> Plus the fact there were multiple attacks on the Pentagon<SMACKAKOOK!>
No, there wasn't. You're just a paranoid delusional schizophrenic off
his meds, Roger.
Moron. LOL
--
Roger T.E. Wittekind
PO Box 471
167 40th Avenue
East Moline, IL 61244
309-755-6374
309-755-6394
Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East
Moline, IL.
Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.
For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.
B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".
C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).
D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.
E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL
F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL
G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just
as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL
H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID:
<e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of
widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're
off your meds, Roget Wittekind.
I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're
now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator"
that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no
EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon
proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind.
J) To explain away the lack of any evidence of your k'lame of a
"nuclear terrorism era", your broken brain has conceived that your
magical nukes are employing "Hushaboom technology" (your words) to
silence them.
K) Your broken brain has now stated (MID:
<YtWdnQvC1PTFNWjInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>) that "liquid freon in
the air conditioners helped to turn the nuke into a themo [sic]
nuclear bomb" (your words). Complete and utter nonsense from your
thoroughly broken schizophrenic brain, Roger.
L) In further expanding your delusion, your broken brain has k'lamed
that the reason for the WTC Memorial Lights is to cover up Cherenkov
radiation at the WTC site as a result of a nuclear detonation, kook
blather which I utterly destroy here: MID:
<1f304ece6ae3cd30c1bee10ad300b720@dizum.com> by proving that Cherenkov
radiation in air can only happen with highly energetic beta radiation;
that beta particles due to nuclear fission aren't energetic enough to
cause Cherenkov radiation in air; and that even with beta particles of
maximum possible energy, the Cherenkov radiation in air would only
extend ~2 meters above the ground. That's not taking into account that
the WTC Memorial Lights are currently at the *top* of the 7-story
Battery Parking Garage on Morris Street and are lit only once a year
on 11 Sep. Before the new Goldman Sachs building was built, the lights
were in vacant lot 26 on West Side Highway near the WTC site (on which
the new Goldman Sachs building now sits). They were *never* at the WTC
site. Moron. LOL
IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================
Moron. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 19:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mummp5$o4c$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #268966 |
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> writes: >Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the schizophrenic paranoid-delusional >woman-stalking truck crashing kook), in ><news:8uOdnW2D8s5lOJPLnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump >head first into the wood chipper again: >> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >> news:mum53f$bbc$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> To me, there seems to be some sort of disinformation campaign to try to >>> redefine the history of 9/11 in the minds of Americans by repeatedly >>> planting seeds of doubt. I'm not talking about the schizophrenic babbling >>> of the likes of Rocky, but whoever is producing slick web pages and >>> numerous multi-hour Youtube videos with carefully misleading video clips >>> designed to fool the average viewer. The likes of Rocky lap these up and >>> do their dirty work by kooking about them. Who is behind all that, and >>> why, I haven't figured out yet. Anyway, that's my conspiracy theory, and >>> I am sticking to it. >It's an attempt at antisemitism. They're trying to claim that Israel >was behind the attacks. I was wondering if that tied in somehow. I guess I'm not surprised since one kooktard who has posted here seems to be an anti-semite. Also there was a comment from al Qaeda (not sure if it was bin Laden or someone else) that the Twin Towers in NYC was selected in part because it was part of the Financial District of NYC, and thus would be "full of Jews".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 17:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ujst0b13lsn4vd2oco38iesapb8rd9ccg4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #268959 |
>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:mum53f$bbc$1@pcls7.std.com... >> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: >> >>>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>>news:muic4a$4mb$2@pcls7.std.com... >> >>>>>>That's what I've said all along. He saw the plane hit the Pentagon. >>>>> >>>>> Wow. How much did he see, a good view of the whole thing? If so, did he >>>>> testify in a deposition or anything about what he saw? Did he >>>>> immediately know it was an airliner? >> >>>He said the plane came in very fast and low. Yes, he knew >>>immediately it was a civilian airliner. I asked him about any >>>deposition and he said it wasn't necessary. He was in Naval >>>Intelligence. He's not going to lie. Besides thousands of people >>>traveling along the roads near the Pentagon saw it as well. Only the >>>mentally deranged think anything besides a plane hit the Pentagon. >> >> To me, there seems to be some sort of disinformation campaign to try to >> redefine the history of 9/11 in the minds of Americans by repeatedly >> planting seeds of doubt. I'm not talking about the schizophrenic babbling >> of the likes of Rocky, but whoever is producing slick web pages and >> numerous multi-hour Youtube videos with carefully misleading video clips >> designed to fool the average viewer. The likes of Rocky lap these up and >> do their dirty work by kooking about them. Who is behind all that, and >> why, I haven't figured out yet. Anyway, that's my conspiracy theory, and >> I am sticking to it. My opinion, just ignore it. These conspiracy kooks like Rocky and Bast get attention because they have the Internet available to them and some people like us like to poke them for entertainment. Thirty years ago these people wouldn't have made a ripple in a pond and if they were vocal enough the neighbors would call for the white coats to come and get them. There are all sorts of conspiracy nuts out there. The JFK nuts, the moon landings never happened kooks, etc ... Rocky and Bast are not very bright, they believe every conspiracy tale they read and hear, and they don't bother to do any research of any kind. That's how we have them claiming a rocket hit the Pentagon. They don't know anything about rockets and they know even less about launch platforms. They've been kicked so hard on their rocket claims that now they're claiming there were explosives in the Pentagon as well as a rocket hit the Pentagon. They're dumb and ignorant. But on a rainy day .... as BDK says, " That's comedy gold. "
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 17:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jmhtdc-4mr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #268739 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:31:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:51:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 >>>>>>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a >>>>>>> small hole. >>>>>> >>>>>> You've said Mike Walter's claims are idiocy. And we've said Mike >>>>>> Walter's claims are idiocy. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why do you still bring this up? Everyone agrees to the truth that >>>>>> American Airlines Flight 77 did NOT fold it's wings before it hit >>>>>> the Pentagon. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged passenger >>>>> plane that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that poked 40' >>>>> into the air. Managed to hit a building and not leave any damage >>>>> beyond a 16' round hole. >>>>> >>>>> And that 16' hole was punched through at least 5 reinforced concrete >>>>> walls, in addition to other walls inside each ring. >>>>> >>>>> Only a cruise missile is designed to do that. And even it would have >>>>> had problems, without further explosives being used. >>>>> >>>> >>>> So now you're claiming it was a cruise missile which hit the Pentagon >>>> and that additional explosives were used? >>>> >>>> What platform for your supposed missile? >>>> >>>> What additional explosives and where are you claiming they were >>>> located? >>> >>> I don't need to tell you anything beyond "A Missile" >> >> Your case for a missile is therefore without fact. >> >>> As you refuse to show even one video or picture of any passeneger jet >>> hitting the pentagon. >> >> Why would I need a video or picture when I've already told you my >> husband, a Naval Intelligence Specialist, witnessed the AA plane hit >> the Pentagon? > > > Oh really ? > Well I talked to GOD,...and he told me you are full of shit. > > Let's see you trump, That Trump what, your raving delusional insanity? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 17:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <dijo0b1vfe34hni0517q1iej63jh0lppj4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #268739 |
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:57:05 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:31:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:51:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 >>>>>>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a >>>>>>> small hole. >>>>>> >>>>>> You've said Mike Walter's claims are idiocy. And we've said Mike >>>>>> Walter's claims are idiocy. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why do you still bring this up? Everyone agrees to the truth that >>>>>> American Airlines Flight 77 did NOT fold it's wings before it hit >>>>>> the Pentagon. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged passenger >>>>> plane that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that poked 40' >>>>> into the air. Managed to hit a building and not leave any damage >>>>> beyond a 16' round hole. >>>>> >>>>> And that 16' hole was punched through at least 5 reinforced concrete >>>>> walls, in addition to other walls inside each ring. >>>>> >>>>> Only a cruise missile is designed to do that. And even it would have >>>>> had problems, without further explosives being used. >>>>> >>>> >>>> So now you're claiming it was a cruise missile which hit the Pentagon >>>> and that additional explosives were used? >>>> >>>> What platform for your supposed missile? >>>> >>>> What additional explosives and where are you claiming they were >>>> located? >>> >>> I don't need to tell you anything beyond "A Missile" >> >> Your case for a missile is therefore without fact. >> >>> As you refuse to show even one video or picture of any passeneger jet >>> hitting the pentagon. >> >> Why would I need a video or picture when I've already told you my >> husband, a Naval Intelligence Specialist, witnessed the AA plane hit >> the Pentagon? > >Oh really ? Yes, really. [ flush flouncing hissyfit]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-01 04:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <h40q0btsu60f2gtrso12cv40tnp3f7a0of@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #268739 |
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:57:05 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
[...]
>>>> So now you're claiming it was a cruise missile which hit the Pentagon
>>>> and that additional explosives were used?
>>>>
>>>> What platform for your supposed missile?
>>>>
>>>> What additional explosives and where are you claiming they were
>>>> located?
>>>
>>> I don't need to tell you anything beyond "A Missile"
>>
>> Your case for a missile is therefore without fact.
>>
>>> As you refuse to show even one video or picture of any passeneger jet
>>> hitting the pentagon.
>>
>> Why would I need a video or picture when I've already told you my
>> husband, a Naval Intelligence Specialist, witnessed the AA plane hit
>> the Pentagon?
>
>
>
>Oh really ?
>Well I talked to GOD,...and he told me you are full of shit.
>
>Let's see you trump, That
>
Which god? And where is your evidence of this communication?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 04:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qgan0blpm89tk7470behnkqsv0gc5ko3ap@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #268693 |
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:31:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:51:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757
>>>>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a small
>>>>> hole.
>>>>
>>>> You've said Mike Walter's claims are idiocy. And we've said Mike
>>>> Walter's claims are idiocy.
>>>>
>>>> Why do you still bring this up? Everyone agrees to the truth that
>>>> American Airlines Flight 77 did NOT fold it's wings before it hit the
>>>> Pentagon.
>>>
>>>
>>> And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged passenger
>>> plane that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that poked 40' into
>>> the air. Managed to hit a building and not leave any damage beyond a
>>> 16' round hole.
>>>
>>> And that 16' hole was punched through at least 5 reinforced concrete
>>> walls, in addition to other walls inside each ring.
>>>
>>> Only a cruise missile is designed to do that. And even it would have
>>> had problems, without further explosives being used.
>>
>> So now you're claiming it was a cruise missile which hit the Pentagon
>> and that additional explosives were used?
>>
>> What platform for your supposed missile?
>>
>> What additional explosives and where are you claiming they were
>> located?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>I don't need to tell you anything beyond "A Missile"
>As you refuse to show even one video or picture of any passeneger jet
>hitting the pentagon.
>
I recall you linking to a video that showed exactly that.
>How about letting someone excavate the shanksville hole ?
Get permission from the land owner, and I'm sure you can. I doubt
you'll find much, since it's already been thoroughly searched.
>And let the truther groups have observers on scene
>You should have all sorts of proof there
>
And when it PROVES your delusions false, as has been done
already, what will you do?
>Tell your handlers to simply show us some conclusive eveidence, and you
>would shut us up for good.
>....But you can't come up with anything more than a fairytale.
>
When, in reality please, has Sarah promoted the Troofers' claims?
Be specific when you answer.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 23:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n5irdc-u1l.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #268687 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 >>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a small >>> hole. >> >> You've said Mike Walter's claims are idiocy. And we've said Mike >> Walter's claims are idiocy. >> >> Why do you still bring this up? Everyone agrees to the truth that >> American Airlines Flight 77 did NOT fold it's wings before it hit the >> Pentagon. > > > > > > And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged passenger plane > that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that poked 40' into the air. > Managed to hit a building and not leave any damage beyond a 16' round hole. That is trivial; the actual hole in the outer wall was MUCH bigger than that, babbling kook. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 19:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <muf7lf$46o$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #268691 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 >>>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a small >>>> hole. >>> >>> You've said Mike Walter's claims are idiocy. And we've said Mike >>> Walter's claims are idiocy. >>> >>> Why do you still bring this up? Everyone agrees to the truth that >>> American Airlines Flight 77 did NOT fold it's wings before it hit the >>> Pentagon. >> >> >> >> >> >> And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged passenger >> plane that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that poked 40' into >> the air. Managed to hit a building and not leave any damage beyond a >> 16' round hole. > > That is trivial; the actual hole in the outer wall was MUCH bigger than > that, babbling kook. > > <snip remaining kook babble> No it wasn't,.....even if you pretend the whole crashed in section happened immediately,....the plane would still be wider, and the tail would have caused damage all the way up the wall to the roof. Yet the CNN reporter on the scene said, no sign of any plane causing the damage YOUR FAIRYTALE IS BUSTED !! Even if you now claim the plane was made from water monster alien boogy-men
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 00:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bdmrdc-eel.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #268696 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 >>>>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a small >>>>> hole. >>>> >>>> You've said Mike Walter's claims are idiocy. And we've said Mike >>>> Walter's claims are idiocy. >>>> >>>> Why do you still bring this up? Everyone agrees to the truth that >>>> American Airlines Flight 77 did NOT fold it's wings before it hit the >>>> Pentagon. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged passenger >>> plane that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that poked 40' into >>> the air. Managed to hit a building and not leave any damage beyond a >>> 16' round hole. >> >> That is trivial; the actual hole in the outer wall was MUCH bigger than >> that, babbling kook. >> >> <snip remaining kook babble> > > > No it wasn't,.....even if you pretend the whole crashed in section happened Yes, it was, raving lunatic. Repeating the lie does not make it so, kook. <snip remaining kook drivel> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 08:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <WdudnbZ5ZIzlf5bLnZ2dnUU7-e-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #268696 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:muf7lf$46o$1@dont-email.me... > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 >>>>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a small >>>>> hole. >>>> >>>> You've said Mike Walter's claims are idiocy. And we've said Mike >>>> Walter's claims are idiocy. >>>> >>>> Why do you still bring this up? Everyone agrees to the truth that >>>> American Airlines Flight 77 did NOT fold it's wings before it hit the >>>> Pentagon. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged passenger >>> plane that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that poked 40' into >>> the air. Managed to hit a building and not leave any damage beyond a >>> 16' round hole. >> >> That is trivial; the actual hole in the outer wall was MUCH bigger than >> that, babbling kook. >> >> <snip remaining kook babble> > > > > > No it wasn't,.....even if you pretend the whole crashed in section > happened immediately,....the plane would still be wider, and the tail > would have caused damage all the way up the wall to the roof. > > Yet the CNN reporter on the scene said, no sign of any plane causing the > damage > > YOUR FAIRYTALE IS BUSTED !! > > Even if you now claim the plane was made from water monster alien > boogy-men I've been thinking and there is another possibility on how a 757 could fit into a hole smaller than the width of goalpost. http://en.memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Changeling 9/11 wasn't just a fairytale but it was also a Sci-Fi Flick. Too bad their crash dynamic were so bad or they might have fooled a few more people. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 00:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mufalr$1eh$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #268687 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged passenger plane >that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that poked 40' into the air. >Managed to hit a building and not leave any damage beyond a 16' round hole. 96 feet, lying kooktard.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-01 15:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <NO-dnXYJq4sbBZDLnZ2dnUU7-b_OydjZ@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #268701 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mufalr$1eh$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: > >>And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged passenger >>plane >>that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that poked 40' into the air. >>Managed to hit a building and not leave any damage beyond a 16' round >>hole. > > 96 feet, lying kooktard. She was talking pre-collapse or right after the alleged impact. And still the best explanation for why there was so little debris from a 757 at the Pentagon is there was no 757. DUH And the best explanation for why there is a discrepancy in what time the alleged impact was supposed to have happened is there were multiple attacks on the Pentagon. Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-01 21:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5lj0ec-au8.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #268884 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:mufalr$1eh$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >> >>>And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged passenger >>>plane >>>that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that poked 40' into the air. >>>Managed to hit a building and not leave any damage beyond a 16' round >>>hole. >> >> 96 feet, lying kooktard. > > She was talking pre-collapse or right after the alleged impact. > > And still the best explanation for why there was so little debris from a 757 > at the Pentagon is there was no 757. DUH The rational explaination for sane people is that most of the debris was inside the Pentagon, raving kook. > And the best explanation for why there is a discrepancy in what time the > alleged impact was supposed to have happened is there were multiple attacks > on the Pentagon. The rational explaination for sane people is that in 2001 almost no clock in the entire country was set to the actual time, raving kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 17 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.conspiracy
csiph-web