Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #267744 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-17 10:03 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-19 03:39 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 185 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.conspiracy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-17 10:03 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 11:19 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 09:47 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 16:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 12:11 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 09:04 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:31 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 12:39 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:04 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:15 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-20 10:07 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 09:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! naazim palan <naazimpalan@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 12:52 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-21 10:20 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:22 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 07:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 15:57 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! naazim palan <naazimpalan@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 12:54 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:28 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 23:14 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 18:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:21 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 14:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 19:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 16:21 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 20:38 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 03:27 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:38 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:40 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:15 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! joeturn <joeturn2000@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-19 17:14 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:09 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! joeturn <joeturn2000@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-19 17:00 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-17 17:57 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-17 13:28 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:09 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kid Wills is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:25 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kid Wills is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-18 19:14 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kid Wills is a BIG LIAR ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-17 19:45 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 15:30 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 19:36 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 16:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 20:35 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-18 09:39 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 17:28 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-18 17:48 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 22:28 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 16:53 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 17:34 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 21:48 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 09:57 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 20:17 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:29 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 16:13 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 17:36 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-19 13:20 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 10:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:19 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:38 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 12:52 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 12:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-19 18:53 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:17 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 01:53 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 23:35 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 05:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 12:29 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 17:07 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 18:39 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:50 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 23:14 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 23:44 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 20:33 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 22:57 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-21 10:34 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:52 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:20 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 21:19 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 21:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 03:59 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in more lies ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 08:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in more lies ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in even more lies ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 15:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in even more lies ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 00:58 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in even more lies ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:37 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in even more lies ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:37 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-21 10:48 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 10:01 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-21 10:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 05:07 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-22 17:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 23:27 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 07:56 +0200
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 01:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-21 13:01 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 15:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 09:52 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-19 20:32 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:31 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 01:54 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 09:52 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-20 15:21 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:22 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-21 13:01 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 13:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-18 17:55 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:23 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 07:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:31 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 13:59 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:07 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 07:57 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 07:22 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:20 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:19 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 03:01 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:48 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 16:24 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 13:58 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-18 19:14 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-18 18:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:18 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 13:03 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-20 10:01 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:40 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! joeturn <joeturn2000@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-19 17:05 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-17 17:32 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 22:54 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-18 06:39 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-18 19:14 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 10:01 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:29 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 14:05 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 16:34 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 17:44 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 14:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-19 00:34 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 11:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:18 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 14:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 22:09 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 13:03 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 12:17 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 14:41 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 18:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 18:53 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 21:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 22:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 23:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-21 02:30 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-21 02:58 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 06:34 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-22 14:17 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-22 14:17 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:59 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-19 12:06 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( the Ediot forgets a link I gave him earlier ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 18:58 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 01:16 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:39 -0500
Page 7 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 13:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nvOdnS-ChPt3wGHInZ2dnUU7-bednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #267842 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mthd76$24b$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 collapsed >>they always have to show cartoons? <G> > > Those "cartoons" are the product of CAD software. CAD software is used > nowadays all the time in the design of new buildings. In this case, they > used it to model what happens in response to certain events. > > (Do you really expect them to build copies of WTC7 and WTC1, and fly a > plane into the rebuilt WTC1 to see what happens to the rebuilt WTC7?) That is exactly what NIST did with WTC1. NIST rebuilt one floor of WTC1 at Underwriters Laboratory and tried to get the floor to fail the way they claimed it did and it didn't happen so they had to resort to the use of cartoons where they never gave people the values they used in their cartoons. You can read more about what NIST did at: "Guest Column by Kevin Ryan - Science Died On 9/11" http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/02/17/guest-column-kevin-ryan-science-died-911/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 17:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mti14u$1p6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #267853 |
Rocky wrote: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:mthd76$24b$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >>> And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 >>> collapsed they always have to show cartoons? <G> >> >> Those "cartoons" are the product of CAD software. CAD software is used >> nowadays all the time in the design of new buildings. In this case, >> they used it to model what happens in response to certain events. >> >> (Do you really expect them to build copies of WTC7 and WTC1, and fly a >> plane into the rebuilt WTC1 to see what happens to the rebuilt WTC7?) > > That is exactly what NIST did with WTC1. NIST rebuilt one floor of > WTC1 at Underwriters Laboratory and tried to get the floor to fail the > way they claimed it did and it didn't happen so they had to resort to > the use of cartoons where they never gave people the values they used > in their cartoons. > > You can read more about what NIST did at: > "Guest Column by Kevin Ryan - Science Died On 9/11" > http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/02/17/guest-column-kevin-ryan-science-died-911/ I've been using CAD/CAM packages since the 1990's,....and I can make it show a sphere, rotate into itself on a computer screen. Too bad real life isn't a computer game, huh.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 09:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30672bf2947d219598c2be@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #267863 |
In article <mti14u$1p6$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > Rocky wrote: > > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > > news:mthd76$24b$1@pcls7.std.com... > >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >> > >>> And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 > >>> collapsed they always have to show cartoons? <G> > >> > >> Those "cartoons" are the product of CAD software. CAD software is used > >> nowadays all the time in the design of new buildings. In this case, > >> they used it to model what happens in response to certain events. > >> > >> (Do you really expect them to build copies of WTC7 and WTC1, and fly a > >> plane into the rebuilt WTC1 to see what happens to the rebuilt WTC7?) > > > > That is exactly what NIST did with WTC1. NIST rebuilt one floor of > > WTC1 at Underwriters Laboratory and tried to get the floor to fail the > > way they claimed it did and it didn't happen so they had to resort to > > the use of cartoons where they never gave people the values they used > > in their cartoons. > > > > You can read more about what NIST did at: > > "Guest Column by Kevin Ryan - Science Died On 9/11" > > http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/02/17/guest-column-kevin-ryan-science-died-911/ > > > > > > > > I've been using CAD/CAM packages since the 1990's,....and I can make it show > a sphere, rotate into itself on a computer screen. ~20 years and that's the best you can do? > > Too bad real life isn't a computer game, huh. Too bad Trooftardery doesn't make any sense, huh? -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 03:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6q7qva9eptgemmi9plbf9llgi0abbire86@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #267837 |
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:29:26 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:4b19214a-b3a7-487b-8237-20dcc1cfa3e6@googlegroups.com...
>> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> watch the videos faggot, building 7 is cut in half by the falling tower,
>> you freak of nature as all saw and reported, turdo.
>
>What matters is that when WTC7 fell it fell at free fall speed for over 2
>seconds and that does not just happen unless if cartoon physics is applied.
>
Yes, in fact, it does.
>And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 collapsed
>they always have to show cartoons? <G>
Because building a new #7 just to prove your delusions wrong
would be too costly.
They used computer models, as any educated and mentally sound
person would expect.
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 07:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtjhn6$i96$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #267897 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:29:26 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >> "Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:4b19214a-b3a7-487b-8237-20dcc1cfa3e6@googlegroups.com... >>> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>> >>> watch the videos faggot, building 7 is cut in half by the falling >>> tower, you freak of nature as all saw and reported, turdo. >> >> What matters is that when WTC7 fell it fell at free fall speed for >> over 2 seconds and that does not just happen unless if cartoon physics >> is applied. >> > > Yes, in fact, it does. > >> And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 >> collapsed they always have to show cartoons? <G> > > Because building a new #7 just to prove your delusions wrong > would be too costly. > They used computer models, as any educated and mentally sound > person would expect. I've been using CAD/CAM packages since the 1990's,....and I can make it show a sphere, rotate into itself on a computer screen. Too bad real life isn't a computer game, huh.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 11:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qd3rvapvpdgomeck6tn5gsagmm9kgel01d@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #267915 |
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:44:39 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:29:26 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:4b19214a-b3a7-487b-8237-20dcc1cfa3e6@googlegroups.com...
>>>> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>> watch the videos faggot, building 7 is cut in half by the falling
>>>> tower, you freak of nature as all saw and reported, turdo.
>>>
>>> What matters is that when WTC7 fell it fell at free fall speed for
>>> over 2 seconds and that does not just happen unless if cartoon physics
>>> is applied.
>>
>> Yes, in fact, it does.
>>
>>> And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7
>>> collapsed they always have to show cartoons? <G>
>>
>> Because building a new #7 just to prove your delusions wrong
>> would be too costly.
>> They used computer models, as any educated and mentally sound
>> person would expect.
>
>
>
>I've been using CAD/CAM packages since the 1990's,....
Good for you.
>and I can make it show
>a sphere, rotate into itself on a computer screen.
>
Good for you. In another 20 years you may learn how to do other
neat tricks with CAD. Probably not if this is all you've been able to
master in 20 years, but maybe.
>Too bad real life isn't a computer game, huh.
Too bad what you claimed happened on 9/11/01 isn't real life,
huh?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 13:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtk7mn$a40$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #267941 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:44:39 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:29:26 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> "Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> news:4b19214a-b3a7-487b-8237-20dcc1cfa3e6@googlegroups.com... >>>>> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: >>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>> watch the videos faggot, building 7 is cut in half by the falling >>>>> tower, you freak of nature as all saw and reported, turdo. >>>> >>>> What matters is that when WTC7 fell it fell at free fall speed for >>>> over 2 seconds and that does not just happen unless if cartoon >>>> physics is applied. >>> >>> Yes, in fact, it does. >>> >>>> And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 >>>> collapsed they always have to show cartoons? <G> >>> >>> Because building a new #7 just to prove your delusions wrong >>> would be too costly. >>> They used computer models, as any educated and mentally sound >>> person would expect. >> >> >> >> I've been using CAD/CAM packages since the 1990's,.... > > Good for you. > >> and I can make it show >> a sphere, rotate into itself on a computer screen. >> > > Good for you. In another 20 years you may learn how to do other > neat tricks with CAD. Probably not if this is all you've been able to > master in 20 years, but maybe. I know far more than that. From both cad and even work I've done on computer games. It's amazing how apps allow you to manipulate or create completely new models of physics, that simply don't exist in the real world. Of course allowing other to examine you models is always the way to let them see why your program works the way it does. COMPUTER SIMULATIONS ARE WRITTEN AND CONTROLLED BY HUMANS. Not by HAL from 2001......which ALSO never really existed in real life.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 05:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <081tva9s1c2uss24gib2bffih0q7lesm1u@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #267956 |
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 13:59:09 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:44:39 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:29:26 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:4b19214a-b3a7-487b-8237-20dcc1cfa3e6@googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> watch the videos faggot, building 7 is cut in half by the falling
>>>>>> tower, you freak of nature as all saw and reported, turdo.
>>>>>
>>>>> What matters is that when WTC7 fell it fell at free fall speed for
>>>>> over 2 seconds and that does not just happen unless if cartoon
>>>>> physics is applied.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, in fact, it does.
>>>>
>>>>> And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7
>>>>> collapsed they always have to show cartoons? <G>
>>>>
>>>> Because building a new #7 just to prove your delusions wrong
>>>> would be too costly.
>>>> They used computer models, as any educated and mentally sound
>>>> person would expect.
>>>
>>>
>>> I've been using CAD/CAM packages since the 1990's,....
>>
>> Good for you.
>>
>>> and I can make it show
>>> a sphere, rotate into itself on a computer screen.
>>
>> Good for you. In another 20 years you may learn how to do other
>> neat tricks with CAD. Probably not if this is all you've been able to
>> master in 20 years, but maybe.
>
>
>I know far more than that.
What you know and what you can do may not be the same thing. In
this context, it's clear you still haven't learned how to do anything
else with CAD.
>From both cad and even work I've done on computer games.
>
>It's amazing how apps allow you to manipulate or create completely new
>models of physics, that simply don't exist in the real world.
>
Not really all that amazing to anyone familiar with them.
>Of course allowing other to examine you models is always the way to let them
>see why your program works the way it does.
>
And many have been able to examine the models offered by NIST. In
fact, you've linked to a video that shows one of them. Roger has
linked to videos that show others.
>COMPUTER SIMULATIONS ARE WRITTEN AND CONTROLLED BY HUMANS.
True. But when they use data from the real world, the mentally
sound accept the computer models are an accurate representation of
reality. The mentally ill are, sadly, unable.
>
>Not by HAL from 2001......which ALSO never really existed in real life.
When has anyone claim it did?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 07:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtm6u5$ttn$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #268012 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 13:59:09 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:44:39 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:29:26 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:4b19214a-b3a7-487b-8237-20dcc1cfa3e6@googlegroups.com... >>>>>>> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: >>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> watch the videos faggot, building 7 is cut in half by the falling >>>>>>> tower, you freak of nature as all saw and reported, turdo. >>>>>> >>>>>> What matters is that when WTC7 fell it fell at free fall speed for >>>>>> over 2 seconds and that does not just happen unless if cartoon >>>>>> physics is applied. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, in fact, it does. >>>>> >>>>>> And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 >>>>>> collapsed they always have to show cartoons? <G> >>>>> >>>>> Because building a new #7 just to prove your delusions wrong >>>>> would be too costly. >>>>> They used computer models, as any educated and mentally sound >>>>> person would expect. >>>> >>>> >>>> I've been using CAD/CAM packages since the 1990's,.... >>> >>> Good for you. >>> >>>> and I can make it show >>>> a sphere, rotate into itself on a computer screen. >>> >>> Good for you. In another 20 years you may learn how to do other >>> neat tricks with CAD. Probably not if this is all you've been able to >>> master in 20 years, but maybe. >> >> >> I know far more than that. > > What you know and what you can do may not be the same thing. In > this context, it's clear you still haven't learned how to do anything > else with CAD. > >> From both cad and even work I've done on computer games. >> >> It's amazing how apps allow you to manipulate or create completely new >> models of physics, that simply don't exist in the real world. >> > > Not really all that amazing to anyone familiar with them. > >> Of course allowing other to examine you models is always the way to >> let them see why your program works the way it does. >> > > And many have been able to examine the models offered by NIST. In > fact, you've linked to a video that shows one of them. Roger has > linked to videos that show others. > >> COMPUTER SIMULATIONS ARE WRITTEN AND CONTROLLED BY HUMANS. > > True. But when they use data from the real world, the mentally > sound accept the computer models are an accurate representation of > reality. The mentally ill are, sadly, unable. > >> >> Not by HAL from 2001......which ALSO never really existed in real life. > > When has anyone claim it did? When you crop out the answers I've already written and try to pretend thaty never existed. You prove why 9/11 was an inside job. ....Or you wouldn't have to try hiding anything
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 07:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <OfednWP-Bt6wOGPInZ2dnUU7-fednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #268025 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:mtm6u5$ttn$1@dont-email.me... > > > K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 13:59:09 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:44:39 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:29:26 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:4b19214a-b3a7-487b-8237-20dcc1cfa3e6@googlegroups.com... >>>>>>>> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> watch the videos faggot, building 7 is cut in half by the falling >>>>>>>> tower, you freak of nature as all saw and reported, turdo. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What matters is that when WTC7 fell it fell at free fall speed for >>>>>>> over 2 seconds and that does not just happen unless if cartoon >>>>>>> physics is applied. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, in fact, it does. >>>>>> >>>>>>> And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 >>>>>>> collapsed they always have to show cartoons? <G> >>>>>> >>>>>> Because building a new #7 just to prove your delusions wrong >>>>>> would be too costly. >>>>>> They used computer models, as any educated and mentally sound >>>>>> person would expect. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I've been using CAD/CAM packages since the 1990's,.... >>>> >>>> Good for you. >>>> >>>>> and I can make it show >>>>> a sphere, rotate into itself on a computer screen. >>>> >>>> Good for you. In another 20 years you may learn how to do other >>>> neat tricks with CAD. Probably not if this is all you've been able to >>>> master in 20 years, but maybe. >>> >>> >>> I know far more than that. >> >> What you know and what you can do may not be the same thing. In >> this context, it's clear you still haven't learned how to do anything >> else with CAD. >> >>> From both cad and even work I've done on computer games. >>> >>> It's amazing how apps allow you to manipulate or create completely new >>> models of physics, that simply don't exist in the real world. >>> >> >> Not really all that amazing to anyone familiar with them. >> >>> Of course allowing other to examine you models is always the way to >>> let them see why your program works the way it does. >>> >> >> And many have been able to examine the models offered by NIST. In >> fact, you've linked to a video that shows one of them. Roger has >> linked to videos that show others. >> >>> COMPUTER SIMULATIONS ARE WRITTEN AND CONTROLLED BY HUMANS. >> >> True. But when they use data from the real world, the mentally >> sound accept the computer models are an accurate representation of >> reality. The mentally ill are, sadly, unable. >> >>> >>> Not by HAL from 2001......which ALSO never really existed in real life. >> >> When has anyone claim it did? > > > > > > > > When you crop out the answers I've already written and try to pretend > thaty never existed. > You prove why 9/11 was an inside job. > > ....Or you wouldn't have to try hiding anything And yet if you crop out Kid Wills bs he puts it all back and in such a way it is impossible to find out where his reply really is. Kid Wills has obviously never posted to a moderated group because they will only allow you to keep what you are replying to. Kid Wills certainly took his physics lessons from Popeye and roadrunner cartoons and does not realize that a hollow jet that even floats can not make road runner cutouts in steel and concrete exoskeletons unless if the 767 was going 3 times the speed of sound and then it fly apart before it hit anything because they are not built for that speed especially near sea level. 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs Rocky Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 18:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <cpfuva129uq250ga2js00gickvflrkj91n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #268026 |
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:22:09 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
[...]
>>>> Not by HAL from 2001......which ALSO never really existed in real life.
>>>
>>> When has anyone claim it did?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> When you crop out the answers I've already written and try to pretend
>> thaty never existed.
>> You prove why 9/11 was an inside job.
>>
>> ....Or you wouldn't have to try hiding anything
>
>And yet if you crop out Kid Wills bs he puts it all back and in such a way
>it is impossible to find out where his reply really is.
>
Nothing of Bast's post was removed. But you already know this.
That you DISHONESTLY snip in an attempt to alter the context, and
I restore it only serves to further prove your mental defects make you
dishonest.
Snipping is fine, but acknowledge that you've done so, and don't
alter the context. But you have no choice in the matter. Your mind is
so screwed up, you will never be able to understand. And that is truly
sad.
>Kid Wills has obviously never posted to a moderated group because they will
>only allow you to keep what you are replying to.
Keep guessing at my real name. Of course, your mental defects
means you will OBSESS about Kid being it. You can't stop yourself.
>
>Kid Wills certainly took his physics lessons from Popeye and roadrunner
>cartoons and does not realize that a hollow jet that even floats can not
>make road runner cutouts in steel and concrete exoskeletons unless if the
>767 was going 3 times the speed of sound and then it fly apart before it hit
>anything because they are not built for that speed especially near sea
>level.
You clearly know nothing of physics.
>
>911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
This has already been addressed. It's been explained to you.
What do you think you gain by continuing to lie about this?
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 18:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <7ofuva1kuhoqn5006188dbvjvgds40465n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #268025 |
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:57:13 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 13:59:09 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:44:39 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:29:26 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:4b19214a-b3a7-487b-8237-20dcc1cfa3e6@googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> watch the videos faggot, building 7 is cut in half by the falling
>>>>>>>> tower, you freak of nature as all saw and reported, turdo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What matters is that when WTC7 fell it fell at free fall speed for
>>>>>>> over 2 seconds and that does not just happen unless if cartoon
>>>>>>> physics is applied.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, in fact, it does.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7
>>>>>>> collapsed they always have to show cartoons? <G>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because building a new #7 just to prove your delusions wrong
>>>>>> would be too costly.
>>>>>> They used computer models, as any educated and mentally sound
>>>>>> person would expect.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been using CAD/CAM packages since the 1990's,....
>>>>
>>>> Good for you.
>>>>
>>>>> and I can make it show
>>>>> a sphere, rotate into itself on a computer screen.
>>>>
>>>> Good for you. In another 20 years you may learn how to do other
>>>> neat tricks with CAD. Probably not if this is all you've been able to
>>>> master in 20 years, but maybe.
>>>
>>>
>>> I know far more than that.
>>
>> What you know and what you can do may not be the same thing. In
>> this context, it's clear you still haven't learned how to do anything
>> else with CAD.
>>
>>> From both cad and even work I've done on computer games.
>>>
>>> It's amazing how apps allow you to manipulate or create completely new
>>> models of physics, that simply don't exist in the real world.
>>
>> Not really all that amazing to anyone familiar with them.
>>
>>> Of course allowing other to examine you models is always the way to
>>> let them see why your program works the way it does.
>>
>> And many have been able to examine the models offered by NIST. In
>> fact, you've linked to a video that shows one of them. Roger has
>> linked to videos that show others.
>>
>>> COMPUTER SIMULATIONS ARE WRITTEN AND CONTROLLED BY HUMANS.
>>
>> True. But when they use data from the real world, the mentally
>> sound accept the computer models are an accurate representation of
>> reality. The mentally ill are, sadly, unable.
>>
>>>
>>> Not by HAL from 2001......which ALSO never really existed in real life.
>>
>> When has anyone claim it did?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>When you crop out the answers I've already written and try to pretend thaty
>never existed.
I had only just asked when anyone claimed it did. There was
nothing for me to crop out.
>You prove why 9/11 was an inside job.
>
>....Or you wouldn't have to try hiding anything
What, in reality please, have I cropped out?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 21:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qjsmva5b09jtfhain1o4ct56rq9cbtv028@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #267768 |
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 15:30:19 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>Tony Dragon wrote:
>> On 17/09/2015 16:03, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me...
>>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV!
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08
>>>
>>> Thanks and cool video but it is too bad that Tony the heckler , The
>>> Ediot, Kidd Wills, Sarah the Stalker, jimp, BKD, Giv Shitt, Michael,
>>> Sual, Hagbor and others will ask for proof by Willie E Coyote or the
>>> Roadrunner because those two are the only two with the credentials
>>> that they believe as proven by they still think the CGIs were real. <G>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wile_E._Coyote_and_The_Road_Runner
>>>
>>> Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of videos only
>>> dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. See:
>>>
>>> Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4
>>> ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 )
>>> https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Wow, I'm a heckler, is that a new name for someone who asks question
>> that you can't answer?
>>
>> As to the video, do we know who filmed the first sequence of the plane
>> hitting the tower?
>>
>> Now how about all the people who saw the event happening, were they all
>> mistaken?
>
>
>Absolutely not.
>I'm sure they really saw something hit out of the corner of their eye, and
>then an explosion and fireball, and later buildings disolving into dust.
>
This may well be the case with the first plane. But attention was
focused on the towers when the second plane hit. Literally millions of
people saw it.
>And they may even have later claimed that they saw planes. dragons, UFO's,
>zepplins, godziila, and hundreds of other things hit the towers.
>
>BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and it fell
>just the same.
>
>So what was the cause of WTC 7 collapsing ?????
>
Really big pieces of the twin towers hitting it. This is well
known.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 03:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mtfupc$ro7$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #267768 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >Tony Dragon wrote: >> Now how about all the people who saw the event happening, were they all >> mistaken? >Absolutely not. >I'm sure they really saw something hit out of the corner of their eye, and >then an explosion and fireball, and later buildings disolving into dust. There were thousands of people (and cameras) staring at the towers when the second plane hit. They saw it. Also, the sound of the incoming jets (low and at full power) would have caused lots of people to look. Like the cameraman filming the FDNY crew who heard Flight 11 pass, and pointed his camera to where it was headed, and caught the impact with the North Tower. >BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and it fell >just the same. Many videos show pieces of the North Tower hitting WTC 7. >So what was the cause of WTC 7 collapsing ????? A combination of fires raging for hours, structural damage (Col 20 missing) and unusual construction.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 09:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <_NidnTIXD6LwuWHInZ2dnUU7-YvOydjZ@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #267814 |
Bast post to alt.astronomy Michael "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mtfupc$ro7$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: > >>Tony Dragon wrote: > >>> Now how about all the people who saw the event happening, were they all >>> mistaken? > >>Absolutely not. >>I'm sure they really saw something hit out of the corner of their eye, and >>then an explosion and fireball, and later buildings disolving into dust. > > There were thousands of people (and cameras) staring at the towers when > the second plane hit. They saw it. And a lot of people didn't see those jets either. As a matter of fact when the napalm in the South Tower was ignited both ABC and FOX were talking to eye witnesses that did not see a or hear a jet. > Also, the sound of the incoming jets (low and at full power) would have > caused lots of people to look. Like the cameraman filming the FDNY crew > who heard Flight 11 pass, and pointed his camera to where it was headed, > and caught the impact with the North Tower. riiight. Like they were supposed to be looking for a gas leak but they didn't have that intersection completely blocked off. There are so many things bogus with the Naudet brother's video you can tell they were complicate. >>BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and it >>fell >>just the same. > > Many videos show pieces of the North Tower hitting WTC 7. That doesn't matter. What matters is the speed it came down for over 2 seconds. It takes a hell of a lot of power to accerate a building straight down at freefall speed just like it takes a lot of power to make a car run a 3 second quarter mile. >>So what was the cause of WTC 7 collapsing ????? > > A combination of fires raging for hours, structural damage (Col 20 > missing) > and unusual construction. See, that is exactly what NIST did too. They fail to address why it started out at free fall speed for over 8 floors. If WTC7 had just disappeared what would you have thought of that? Well, basically the Twin Towers did just disappear because 10 story buildings leave more debris than they left. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 16:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mthdsg$24b$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #267839 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >Bast post to alt.astronomy Michael That's rather kooktarded, isn't it. I guess Bast isn't interested in my posts. >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:mtfupc$ro7$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >>>BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and it >>>fell >>>just the same. >> >> Many videos show pieces of the North Tower hitting WTC 7. >That doesn't matter. Yes, it does. Bast made the claim nothing hit WTC 7, which many videos show to be false. >>>So what was the cause of WTC 7 collapsing ????? >> >> A combination of fires raging for hours, structural damage (Col 20 >> missing) >> and unusual construction. >See, that is exactly what NIST did too. They didn't address the damage to the south side of WTC7, which I feel contributed to its failure. >If WTC7 had just disappeared what would you have thought of that? Well, >basically the Twin Towers did just disappear because 10 story buildings >leave more debris than they left. The towers "disappeared" into their basement, kook. As proven by 108,222 truckloads of debris hauled out of there.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 13:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <EqWdnbNat4q5wmHInZ2dnUU7-fednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #267843 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mthdsg$24b$2@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>Bast post to alt.astronomy Michael > > That's rather kooktarded, isn't it. I guess Bast isn't interested in my > posts. > >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:mtfupc$ro7$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: > >>>>BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and it >>>>fell >>>>just the same. >>> >>> Many videos show pieces of the North Tower hitting WTC 7. > >>That doesn't matter. > > Yes, it does. Bast made the claim nothing hit WTC 7, which many videos > show to be false. > >>>>So what was the cause of WTC 7 collapsing ????? >>> >>> A combination of fires raging for hours, structural damage (Col 20 >>> missing) >>> and unusual construction. > >>See, that is exactly what NIST did too. > > They didn't address the damage to the south side of WTC7, which I feel > contributed to its failure. > >>If WTC7 had just disappeared what would you have thought of that? Well, >>basically the Twin Towers did just disappear because 10 story buildings >>leave more debris than they left. > > The towers "disappeared" into their basement, kook. As proven by 108,222 > truckloads of debris hauled out of there. Man you are one stupid fcuker because movies of the basements of the Twin Towers prove they did not end up in the basements and you are forgetting to count how much dirt and or M291 resin they constantly hauled into Ground Zero in an attempt to keep the radiation level from three nukes down And do not forget if NIST could lie about the test ran at Underwriters Laboratory then why wouldn't our government lie about other things too? DUH. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 19:14 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mthk6t$b2r$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #267839 |
On 18/09/2015 15:48, Rocky wrote: > Bast post to alt.astronomy Michael > > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:mtfupc$ro7$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >> >>> Tony Dragon wrote: >> >>>> Now how about all the people who saw the event happening, were they all >>>> mistaken? >> >>> Absolutely not. >>> I'm sure they really saw something hit out of the corner of their eye, and >>> then an explosion and fireball, and later buildings disolving into dust. >> >> There were thousands of people (and cameras) staring at the towers when >> the second plane hit. They saw it. > > And a lot of people didn't see those jets either. As a matter of fact when > the napalm in the South Tower was ignited both ABC and FOX were talking to > eye witnesses that did not see a or hear a jet. > > >> Also, the sound of the incoming jets (low and at full power) would have >> caused lots of people to look. Like the cameraman filming the FDNY crew >> who heard Flight 11 pass, and pointed his camera to where it was headed, >> and caught the impact with the North Tower. > > riiight. Like they were supposed to be looking for a gas leak but they > didn't have that intersection completely blocked off. There are so many > things bogus with the Naudet brother's video you can tell they were > complicate. > > >>> BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and it >>> fell >>> just the same. >> >> Many videos show pieces of the North Tower hitting WTC 7. > > That doesn't matter. What matters is the speed it came down for over 2 > seconds. It takes a hell of a lot of power to accerate a building straight > down at freefall speed just like it takes a lot of power to make a car run a > 3 second quarter mile. > > Lets see, would that power be gravity? >>> So what was the cause of WTC 7 collapsing ????? >> >> A combination of fires raging for hours, structural damage (Col 20 >> missing) >> and unusual construction. > > See, that is exactly what NIST did too. They fail to address why it started > out at free fall speed for over 8 floors. > > If WTC7 had just disappeared what would you have thought of that? Well, > basically the Twin Towers did just disappear because 10 story buildings > leave more debris than they left. > > Rocky > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 18:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mti1i5$7ol$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #267851 |
Tony Dragon wrote: > On 18/09/2015 15:48, Rocky wrote: >> Bast post to alt.astronomy Michael >> >> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >> news:mtfupc$ro7$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >>> >>>> Tony Dragon wrote: >>> >>>>> Now how about all the people who saw the event happening, were they >>>>> all mistaken? >>> >>>> Absolutely not. >>>> I'm sure they really saw something hit out of the corner of their >>>> eye, and then an explosion and fireball, and later buildings >>>> disolving into dust. >>> >>> There were thousands of people (and cameras) staring at the towers >>> when the second plane hit. They saw it. >> >> And a lot of people didn't see those jets either. As a matter of fact >> when the napalm in the South Tower was ignited both ABC and FOX were >> talking to eye witnesses that did not see a or hear a jet. >> >> >>> Also, the sound of the incoming jets (low and at full power) would >>> have caused lots of people to look. Like the cameraman filming the >>> FDNY crew who heard Flight 11 pass, and pointed his camera to where >>> it was headed, and caught the impact with the North Tower. >> >> riiight. Like they were supposed to be looking for a gas leak but they >> didn't have that intersection completely blocked off. There are so >> many things bogus with the Naudet brother's video you can tell they >> were complicate. >> >> >>>> BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and >>>> it fell >>>> just the same. >>> >>> Many videos show pieces of the North Tower hitting WTC 7. >> >> That doesn't matter. What matters is the speed it came down for over 2 >> seconds. It takes a hell of a lot of power to accerate a building >> straight down at freefall speed just like it takes a lot of power to >> make a car run a 3 second quarter mile. >> >> > > Lets see, would that power be gravity? Oh heck no, gravity can't account for the speed increase while falling THROUGH the rest of the solid mass of the towers. You need to give it a lot more more energy than gravity alone would account for. Or remove the complete mass of the floors below what is falling. Damn that Neuton guy huh,....him and his rules of mass, momentum, and motion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 09:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30672a9e8d42eeee98c2bd@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #267865 |
In article <mti1i5$7ol$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > Tony Dragon wrote: > > On 18/09/2015 15:48, Rocky wrote: > >> Bast post to alt.astronomy Michael > >> > >> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > >> news:mtfupc$ro7$1@pcls7.std.com... > >>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: > >>> > >>>> Tony Dragon wrote: > >>> > >>>>> Now how about all the people who saw the event happening, were they > >>>>> all mistaken? > >>> > >>>> Absolutely not. > >>>> I'm sure they really saw something hit out of the corner of their > >>>> eye, and then an explosion and fireball, and later buildings > >>>> disolving into dust. > >>> > >>> There were thousands of people (and cameras) staring at the towers > >>> when the second plane hit. They saw it. > >> > >> And a lot of people didn't see those jets either. As a matter of fact > >> when the napalm in the South Tower was ignited both ABC and FOX were > >> talking to eye witnesses that did not see a or hear a jet. > >> > >> > >>> Also, the sound of the incoming jets (low and at full power) would > >>> have caused lots of people to look. Like the cameraman filming the > >>> FDNY crew who heard Flight 11 pass, and pointed his camera to where > >>> it was headed, and caught the impact with the North Tower. > >> > >> riiight. Like they were supposed to be looking for a gas leak but they > >> didn't have that intersection completely blocked off. There are so > >> many things bogus with the Naudet brother's video you can tell they > >> were complicate. > >> > >> > >>>> BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and > >>>> it fell > >>>> just the same. > >>> > >>> Many videos show pieces of the North Tower hitting WTC 7. > >> > >> That doesn't matter. What matters is the speed it came down for over 2 > >> seconds. It takes a hell of a lot of power to accerate a building > >> straight down at freefall speed just like it takes a lot of power to > >> make a car run a 3 second quarter mile. > >> > >> > > > > Lets see, would that power be gravity? > > > > > > > Oh heck no, gravity can't account for the speed increase while falling > THROUGH the rest of the solid mass of the towers. > > You need to give it a lot more more energy than gravity alone would account > for. > Or remove the complete mass of the floors below what is falling. > > Damn that Neuton guy huh,....him and his rules of mass, momentum, and > motion. Your teachers must be wondering how they fucked up so bad when they read insane stuff like the above. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.conspiracy
csiph-web