Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #266833 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andrew Nichols <alukenichols24740@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-09 04:49 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-10-10 04:39 -0500 |
| Articles | 12 on this page of 312 — 26 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.conspiracy
9/11/01 - There were no planes Andrew Nichols <alukenichols24740@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 04:49 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-09 15:14 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-10 09:01 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-10 15:44 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-10 19:07 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 15:17 -0500
Re: Rocky wrong again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-11 20:38 +0000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 18:54 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 00:14 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 09:11 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 08:48 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:33 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes joeturn <joeturn2000@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-16 22:35 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 04:02 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes joeturn <joeturn2000@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-19 16:54 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 21:46 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:12 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-14 19:24 +0100
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 13:36 -0500
Re: Rocky still crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 18:54 +0000
Re: Rocky still crazy joeturn <joeturn2000@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-16 22:25 -0700
Re: Rocky still crazy joeturn <joeturn2000@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-19 16:52 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-14 21:19 +0100
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-14 14:28 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:13 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 19:31 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-11 14:43 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-11 17:26 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 03:55 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-11 06:43 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-11 19:22 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-11 15:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-12 06:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 11:47 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-13 07:04 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-13 05:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-14 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 15:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 17:22 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 15:43 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 17:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-15 17:39 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 19:29 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 09:21 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 08:57 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 15:50 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 20:08 +0000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 16:43 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 16:51 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 21:10 +0000
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:29 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 17:20 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:26 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 18:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 21:41 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 18:52 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 00:23 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:42 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 01:13 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:45 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 16:48 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 21:43 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:50 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 06:51 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:56 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 06:25 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 07:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:09 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 23:00 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:03 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 20:24 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:43 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:01 -0500
9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:29 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:25 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 14:13 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 13:25 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 17:56 +0000
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:19 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 17:00 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 17:09 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:40 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:24 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 10:12 -0400
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:35 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-20 09:47 -0400
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:44 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:20 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:36 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:41 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:11 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 05:09 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 10:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:20 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:43 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 21:15 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:12 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:13 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 22:25 +0000
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:48 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:02 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:29 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 18:49 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-21 00:02 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-21 02:27 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-21 03:04 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-22 14:18 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 21:41 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 00:57 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 15:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 15:59 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 03:49 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 03:48 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 15:56 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:18 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-25 15:21 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 17:05 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:22 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:40 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 13:06 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 16:59 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 21:48 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 16:03 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 07:58 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:30 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 17:58 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 05:23 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 13:38 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:36 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 14:05 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 03:48 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:48 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-24 09:41 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 13:08 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 17:13 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 21:52 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-25 15:46 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 16:14 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 08:24 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 03:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:32 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-21 13:23 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 15:50 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 16:46 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:32 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:06 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:13 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:22 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-20 16:17 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 05:42 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 16:54 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:33 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:15 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-20 10:41 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 14:53 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-20 16:11 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 18:23 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-21 01:55 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 05:53 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 07:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-21 13:57 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:07 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:42 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 11:24 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:45 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:15 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 05:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:38 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 07:02 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 21:26 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 21:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:31 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:57 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 16:01 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 16:19 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:11 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:40 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:11 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:15 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 01:12 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes joeturn <joeturn2000@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-16 23:03 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 06:44 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:39 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:15 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 22:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:14 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 20:04 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:41 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:41 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:17 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 22:11 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:14 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 13:07 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-21 18:25 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-21 20:27 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:36 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-22 10:28 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2015-09-22 17:47 +0100
9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 2 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 05:27 +0200
9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 06:09 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1 "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-23 20:22 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-24 06:53 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-24 01:49 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-25 07:33 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1a Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-24 06:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:27 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 17:38 -0400
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 05:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:42 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:19 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-16 07:48 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 04:18 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 15:55 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-15 17:03 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:38 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 04:01 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:36 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:07 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:44 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:41 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:21 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 05:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:20 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:14 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:56 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-22 03:28 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:36 -0500
9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-16 07:37 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:42 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:46 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:06 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 00:30 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:38 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-16 17:59 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 07:11 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 00:05 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-14 17:06 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 15:57 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:31 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 16:06 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 00:25 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 12:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-11 17:20 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:36 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-12 08:02 -0400
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-13 05:42 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-13 04:18 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-13 04:45 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 16:04 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 16:03 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-14 14:19 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 16:17 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:54 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-16 16:01 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:08 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 04:02 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-17 02:12 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-17 13:33 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-17 13:45 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:45 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:46 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:25 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:22 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 11:32 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:56 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 07:08 +1000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-09 17:38 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 11:50 +1000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:40 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes ( plane missing in Chopper 5 wide shot ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-10 14:00 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes ( plane missing in Chopper 5 wide shot ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 19:36 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes ( plane missing in Chopper 5 wide shot ) (Kid is a lying sack of shit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 14:16 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes ( plane missing in Chopper 5 wide shot ) (Kid is a lying sack of shit ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-11 16:00 -0400
Re: Rocky still babbling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-11 20:21 +0000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes ( plane missing in Chopper 5 wide shot ) (Kid is a lying sack of shit ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-11 21:51 +0000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes ( plane missing in Chopper 5 wide shot ) (Kid is a lying sack of shit ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-12 13:52 +0000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes ( plane missing in Chopper 5 wide shot ) (Kid is a lying sack of shit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:11 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes ( Michael pokes fun at the dolly that was used to cart an engine into place ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 00:26 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes ( plane missing in Chopper 5 wide shot ) (Kid is a lying sack of shit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:14 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes ( plane missing in Chopper 5 wide shot ) (Kid is a lying sack of shit ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-12 06:14 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes joeturn <joeturn2000@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-21 18:31 -0700
9/11/01 - There were no planes seon <seongf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 14:52 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 09:01 +1100
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 04:39 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 04:39 -0500
Page 16 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 14 15 [16]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-11 20:21 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky still babbling |
| Message-ID | <tnpbcc-qs6.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #266996 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Oh shit another one of those complete idiots that thinks that CGIs flew too > fast for marker lights or in this place to be caught on camera. Too fcuking > funny. As you have been told many times now, kook, airplanes don't have "marker" lights, they have position lights which are nearly impossible to see in bright daylight, you raving lunatic. > BTW your explanation does not hold water because test were made and jets > from a long distance away at a good speed are still visible in a video > making you a GREAT BIG LIAR as usual. <G> Airplanes are, postion lights aren't, raving, retarded, lunatic. > Hell, I even started a new thread just for you asking for evidence and oddly > enough you never even posted to it. What's that tell you and me and > everybody else that sees a world of your bullshit? People are tiring of your insane, contradictory, raving posts, kook. <snip remaining kook drivel> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-11 21:51 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes ( plane missing in Chopper 5 wide shot ) (Kid is a lying sack of shit ) |
| Message-ID | <msvicc$vvk$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #266996 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:ld84va9ohq8t3s9fk9329euh0e4ogp7shk@4ax.com... >>>Planted debris that didn't match the jet it was supposed to eome from. >> >> But, as you KNOW, it did match. >ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT. Check out tthe following: > https://www.google.com/search?q=jet+engine+on+murry+street That's the problem with the kooktards being so busy. They clog up Google Search (which I'm sure was their intent). Using that URL, the first several pages of results are all kooksites or conspiracy sites of some sort, and it's hard to find any with actual hard data.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 13:52 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes ( plane missing in Chopper 5 wide shot ) (Kid is a lying sack of shit ) |
| Message-ID | <mt1ami$mat$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #267019 |
moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) writes: >"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >>news:ld84va9ohq8t3s9fk9329euh0e4ogp7shk@4ax.com... >>>>Planted debris that didn't match the jet it was supposed to eome from. >>> >>> But, as you KNOW, it did match. >>ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT. Check out tthe following: >> https://www.google.com/search?q=jet+engine+on+murry+street >That's the problem with the kooktards being so busy. They clog up Google >Search (which I'm sure was their intent). Using that URL, the first >several pages of results are all kooksites or conspiracy sites of some >sort, and it's hard to find any with actual hard data. Shill #3 wrote: >>ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT. Check out tthe following: >> https://www.google.com/search?q=jet+engine+on+murry+street > Do you mean Murray street? > Spelling errors aside, links to k00k sites are not evidence to > the rational and educated mind. As always, you'll not understand. Ahh, so that's it. Someone must have planted a fake engine on Murry St. and the kooks are kooking about that, so a search of "jet engine on murry street" just finds kooksites. Meanwhile, the real engine fell on Murray St.!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 20:11 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes ( plane missing in Chopper 5 wide shot ) (Kid is a lying sack of shit ) |
| Message-ID | <5aj9vap4fkvc3942qd36oj57aunukaeofe@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #267069 |
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:52:18 +0000 (UTC),
moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:
>moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) writes:
>
>>"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:ld84va9ohq8t3s9fk9329euh0e4ogp7shk@4ax.com...
>
>>>>>Planted debris that didn't match the jet it was supposed to eome from.
>>>>
>>>> But, as you KNOW, it did match.
>
>>>ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT. Check out tthe following:
>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=jet+engine+on+murry+street
>
>>That's the problem with the kooktards being so busy. They clog up Google
>>Search (which I'm sure was their intent). Using that URL, the first
>>several pages of results are all kooksites or conspiracy sites of some
>>sort, and it's hard to find any with actual hard data.
>
>
>Shill #3 wrote:
>
>>>ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT. Check out tthe following:
>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=jet+engine+on+murry+street
>
>> Do you mean Murray street?
>> Spelling errors aside, links to k00k sites are not evidence to
>> the rational and educated mind. As always, you'll not understand.
>
>Ahh, so that's it. Someone must have planted a fake engine on Murry St.
>and the kooks are kooking about that, so a search of "jet engine on murry
>street" just finds kooksites. Meanwhile, the real engine fell on Murray
>St.!
I think it was a typo on Roger's part. Nothing more.
But the first page of results were nothing but k00k sites. Some
more entertaining than others. None offered anything that could be
traced to an authoritative source.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 00:26 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes ( Michael pokes fun at the dolly that was used to cart an engine into place ) |
| Message-ID | <JOWdnQ7_dMhWx2vInZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #267069 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mt1ami$mat$1@pcls7.std.com... > moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) writes: > >>"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>news:ld84va9ohq8t3s9fk9329euh0e4ogp7shk@4ax.com... > >>>>>Planted debris that didn't match the jet it was supposed to eome from. >>>> >>>> But, as you KNOW, it did match. > >>>ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT. Check out tthe following: >>> https://www.google.com/search?q=jet+engine+on+murry+street > >>That's the problem with the kooktards being so busy. They clog up Google >>Search (which I'm sure was their intent). Using that URL, the first >>several pages of results are all kooksites or conspiracy sites of some >>sort, and it's hard to find any with actual hard data. > > > Shill #3 wrote: > >>>ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT. Check out tthe following: >>> https://www.google.com/search?q=jet+engine+on+murry+street > >> Do you mean Murray street? >> Spelling errors aside, links to k00k sites are not evidence to >> the rational and educated mind. As always, you'll not understand. > > Ahh, so that's it. Someone must have planted a fake engine on Murry St. > and the kooks are kooking about that, so a search of "jet engine on murry > street" just finds kooksites. Meanwhile, the real engine fell on Murray > St.! No this is it and I'll even quote the photo: Manhattan trick: At Church Street and Murray a large engine part appeared underneath a construction scaffold. An abandoned dolly was nearby (left). Video caught FBI men using a dolly to unload a large object. Some trick! http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-IGtfcYoHLGI/UHmHpeKqwbI/AAAAAAAAA7Q/mO62hgqy6M0/s1600/fetznewpages6x9sizework8xX.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-11 18:14 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes ( plane missing in Chopper 5 wide shot ) (Kid is a lying sack of shit ) |
| Message-ID | <t0o6vadcra4hoc8k4l3vl9b5psejd98o90@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #266996 |
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:16:20 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:ld84va9ohq8t3s9fk9329euh0e4ogp7shk@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 14:00:31 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:tqg1va1o8ebmaui7g2uhgrq3uqspl36tom@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 9 Sep 2015 04:49:36 -0700 (PDT), Andrew Nichols
>>>> <alukenichols24740@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>ON that fateful day, September 11, 2001, your eyes deceived you.
>>>>>Only those in the "know" knew the real evil that went on that day.
>>>>
>>>> Planes were hijacked. two crashed into the WTC twin towers. One
>>>> crashed into the Pentagon and one cashed in a field in Pennsylvania.
>>>> At this point, I'm confident everyone knows this is what went on that
>>>> day.
>>>
>>>ROTFLMAO because if that were true there would have been a jet in the wide
>>>shot but there wasn't. See:
>>>
>>>07 - The Key
>>>( indexed to start at 4:04 )
>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=4m4s
>>>
>>>No jets, no jet fuel and you have fallen for a world of shit as proven by
>>>the wide shot above. <G>
>>
>> Do you have any idea how much area a plane traveling between 300
>> and 500 MPH covers?
>
>Oh shit another one of those complete idiots that thinks that CGIs flew too
>fast for marker lights
What, in reality please, are marker lights?
>or in this place to be caught on camera. Too fcuking
>funny.
>
CGIs can fly at whatever speed they are programmed to fly. But
since none were used on 9/11, it doesn't matter.
>BTW your explanation does not hold water because test were made and jets
>from a long distance away at a good speed are still visible in a video
>making you a GREAT BIG LIAR as usual. <G>
I await your evidence for this claim of yours. If, as you will
soon prove, it's nothing more than further evidence of your mental
defect(s), you'll only offer avoidance. If you are able to offer
anything at all.
>
>>>>>Truth is, there were no planes.
>>>>
>>>> The debris is in direct opposition to that claim.
>>>
>>>Planted debris that didn't match the jet it was supposed to eome from.
>>
>> But, as you KNOW, it did match.
>
>ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT. Check out tthe following:
> https://www.google.com/search?q=jet+engine+on+murry+street
>
Do you mean Murray street?
Spelling errors aside, links to k00k sites are not evidence to
the rational and educated mind. As always, you'll not understand.
>or
>
>WTC Jet Engine Confirmed NOT From Boeing 767
> http://www.rense.com/general63/wtcc.htm
>
Got anything CREDIBLE?
Jeff Rense is an entertaining radio host, but only a fool would
consider anything associated with him as credible.
Dr. Judy "DEW" Wood is scheduled to be the guest on 9/11/15. You
should give a listen. And laugh. He airs at 9:00pm central time.
>> You are, of course, free to
>> provide valid, verifiable evidence for your claim that other parts
>> were used. If you're lying, you'll offer avoidance, if you offer
>> anything at all.
>
>You never provided any supporting evidence so that proves you are a lying
>sack of shit as usual.
>
I'm not the one making the claim. You are. It befalls you to
provide the evidence, not me.
If you're simply offering more evidence of your mental defect(s),
you'll continue to try and shift the burden of proof, play avoidance
games, or run away from the matter.
>>>>>Truth is, there were shape shifting fallen angels.
>>>>
>>>> No, they weren't.
>>>
>>>He is a lot closer to the truth than you have ever been.
>>
>> No, he's not. Andrew has been PROVED a false prophet, according
>> to the standards set in the Bible.
>
>He is still a lot closer to the truth about 9/11 then you have ever been and
>you even go out of your way to lie without any supporing links whatsoever.
>What's that tell you about your arguments? <G>
>
Would you like chapter and verse from the Bible? No problem.
Deuteronomy 18:22
Your move.
>>>>>The Bene Ha Elohim took down those three towers, 4 planes and punched a
>>>>>hole in the Pentagon.
>>>>
>>>> The Sons of God didn't take down any towers. Nor did they do
>>>> anything to the Pentagon. It's foolish to claim the crash sight in
>>>> Pennsylvania, where airplane debris was found, was one of the Old
>>>> Testament's Sons of God.
>>>
>>>About the only debris found at Pranksville was from one of the framed and
>>
>> You keep presenting this lie AFTER I, and other, proved the claim
>> a lie. Why do you do this?
>
>ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT. Don't forget your post are filled with so much bullshit
>you had better keep your links around so you can find them if you really
>have them. <G>
>
You've still been caught in another lie.
>>>quite possibly living suicide bombers. That is why you will never have
>>>any photos to support your bullshit about Pranksville, PA.
>>
>> And yet I, and others, linked to them. As is so often the case,
>> you ran away from the evidence.
>
>FYI I know how to pull up MIDs on all my laptops so you don't have to repost
>anything other than a MID. <G>
>
>Hell, I even started a new thread just for you asking for evidence and oddly
>enough you never even posted to it. What's that tell you and me and
>everybody else that sees a world of your bullshit?
You mean the one you posted eight minutes AFTER the post to which
I am replying? The one with Message-ID:
<TqadnYPULp0Bt27InZ2dnUU7-dudnZ2d@giganews.com>?
You're really smart to whine about my not posting to a thread
eight minutes *before* you start the thread.
If you're very, very lucky, I will be the only one to notice the
deception you've offered. But you're not even a little bit lucky.
>
>>>>>Video PROOF!
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bheSZJEm-YY
>>>>
>>>> A k00k ranting about the attacks is not proof. It is, at best, an
>>>> expression of the k00k's opinion.
>>>
>>>Too bad he has supporting evidence in the lack of a jet in the wide shot.
>>
>> See above. If you'd like, I will C&P the far more detailed
>> explanation that proves your claim to be the lie it was and is.
>
>ROTFLMAO because that excuse was used before and it was proven to be a great
>big lie!
>
So do you want me to post it again, or do you honestly think your
avoidance game is working?
>>>07 - The Key
>>>( indexed to start at 4:04 )
>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=4m4s
>>
>> No one operating the cameras knew in advance that another plane
>> was going to hit the second tower. There would have been no reason to
>> tilt, plan or zoom.
>
>Oh bullshit.
You use the oddest terminology for the truth.
>Not only did they know a second plane was on the way they even
>knew what floors were targeted by the so called "fireproofing" more like
>fire spoofing.
Fireproofing was on all floors. How would that tell anyone
another plane was going to hit and where?
>
>> I really like how the narrator has to play semantics about the
>> helicopter arriving on the scene. Yes, it was arriving on the scene.
>> It was about five miles south at the time the second plane hit, but it
>> was heading to the WTC Complex. It was close enough for any educated
>> person to claim it was arriving on the scene.
>> I can go on, if you'd like. Of course, I'll just do a C&P of my
>> previous post where I proved your claim to be the lie it is.
>
>You might as well keep your evidence around because your bullshit is so high
>it is easily taller than the debris pile from WTC7. And why wasn't the
>debris pile from the Twin Towers anywhere near what was left of WTC7? <G>
>
There was much more debris from the towers, as you know. FNVW has
detailed it far better than I did. You did read his posts and verify
the evidence he presented, right?
Or did he use those big words that make your head hurt?
I've added AUK to the groups. This will allow FNVW to repost the
evidence he's already made available, if he wishes, to this thread.
I'd hate to think you didn't have every possible opportunity to review
and confirm the evidence he's provided.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 06:14 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes ( plane missing in Chopper 5 wide shot ) (Kid is a lying sack of shit ) |
| Message-ID | <fdb7f148787f53efb9e224cac3e4f542@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #267036 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> K Wills (Shill #3), in <news:t0o6vadcra4hoc8k4l3vl9b5psejd98o90@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:16:20 -0500, Rocky (aka > Roger Wittekind the schizophrenic paranoid-delusional > woman-stalking truck crashing kook) <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> <SMACKAKOOK!> Moron. LOL > There was much more debris from the towers, as you know. FNVW has > detailed it far better than I did. You did read his posts and verify > the evidence he presented, right? > Or did he use those big words that make your head hurt? > I've added AUK to the groups. This will allow FNVW to repost the > evidence he's already made available, if he wishes, to this thread. > I'd hate to think you didn't have every possible opportunity to review > and confirm the evidence he's provided. Oh, absolutely. After all, Roger Wittekind *admitted* that I'd accounted for nearly everything used to construct the WTC towers. Message-ID: <72605ecfd37587e55fb49fc14f62eca6@dizum.com> ============================================================= <http://www.cct-seecity.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/030-NYC14204.jpg> See those tiny people in relation to that huge fucking pile of rubble towering 15 to 20 stories above them? LOL <http://news.sciencemag.org/sites/default/files/styles/thumb_article_l/public/article_images/20023073.jpg> See that huge fucking pile of rubble? LOL <https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRylmcjT9PDFHZOocG-5rREsMlQEoze1Q9SkVSFmsGNoUZlj6s> See how large that pile looks in relation to that tiny... *fire* *truck*? LOL <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:NY_Firefighter_Deputy_chief_at_wtc.jpg> See how large that pile looks in relation to that tiny... *Caterpillar* *excavator*? LOL <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:NY_Firefighter_Deputy_chief_at_wtc.jpg> See the fire truck with the boom fully extended, spraying a fire hose into the side of the rubble pile because there's no way it could spray all the way to the top? LOL <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZYGqwhQ-Pk> See the pile of rubble extending halfway up the still-standing buildings? LOL <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9T4hWCRvUSM> See the bulldozers which were so small in relation to the size of the rubble pile that they were able to *drive* *onto* *it* to start excavating, just 4 days after the collapse? Now keep in mind, not only was the rubble pile approximately 15 stories *above* street level, the WTC towers had 5 stories of underground parking which was completely filled with rubble. They accounted for all the 200,000 tons of structural steel used to build the towers... now, let's look at how much other material there was in the towers: The WTC complex used 425,000 cubic yards of concrete during construction. One cubic yard will weigh about 4,000 pounds according to cemexusa.com. Now, utilizing my ability to do simple math, which you obviously lack, we arrive at 1,700,000,000 pounds or 850,000 tons of concrete. So, 850,000 + 200,000 = 1,050,000 tons accounted for out of the total 1,462,000 tons of rubble, leaving just 412,000 tons to account for... There was 600,000 square feet of glass in the two towers... that 3/8" thick glass would have weighed a total of 1,434 tons... leaving 410,566 tons to account for... 400 tons of asbestos and an approximately equal amount of spray-on fluffy fireproofing were used in the construction of the WTC towers... leaving 409,766 tons to account for... There was 12,000 miles of wiring in the WTC towers... at an average weight of 106 pounds per 1000 feet (it was fed from 13.8 kV feeders to the distribution center, dropped to 480/277 and 208/120 volts and distributed from there), that would come to 3,358 tons, leaving 406,408 tons to account for... The two 767s each weighed 396,000 pounds for a total of 396 tons, leaving 406,012 tons to account for... The 2977 people who died, at an average weight of 200 pounds each, would have weighed 298 tons, leaving 405,714 tons to account for... The 97 elevators and shaft guides each weighed 110,000 pounds, totaling 5335 tons, leaving 400,379 tons to account for... 40,000 fire doors were used, each weighing approximately 110 pounds, totaling 2200 tons, leaving 398,179 tons to account for... 6 acres of 3cm thick marble was used in the construction, weighing 19 pounds per square foot, totaling 2,483 tons, leaving 395,696 tons to account for... The 10,000 viscoelastic dampers each weighed half a ton, totaling 5000 tons, leaving 390,696 tons to account for... The masts and antennas on 1 WTC weighed 400 tons, leaving 390,296 tons to account for... The air handling equipment and associated ducting weighed approximately 115,000 pounds per floor, totaling 12,650 tons, leaving 377,646 tons to account for... There was The Sphere art structure by Fritz Koenig which weighed 23 tons, leaving 377,623 tons to account for... The approximately 4 million square feet of frieze carpet and undercarpet cushion weighed a total of approximately 2 pounds per square foot for a total of 4000 tons, leaving 373,623 tons to account for... The pipes in the building accounted for over 6000 tons, leaving 367,623 tons to account for... That's a measly 1671 tons per floor for the two towers, easily accounted for by office equipment, interior finish materials, etc. Considering that there was an average of 30,000 square feet of office space per floor, that leaves a per-square-foot floor load of only 111.4 pounds... and with all the office equipment and other stuff the WTC towers had in them, that can easily be accounted for. The WTC towers had a 100 pound per square foot load limit. With all the modernities of modern offices, the floor spars were likely slightly overloaded. The construction was such that viscoelastic dampers (for wind shift dampening) was used between the floor spars and truss frame. It was literally glued between the floor spars and truss frame mounts. The floor spars provided horizontal support to the truss frame (to prevent it bowing inward or outward), and the truss frame provided vertical support to the floor spars (to prevent them drooping downward). They literally constructed a house of cards, each part relying upon other parts for its support, while also providing support to the part supporting it, in another plane. Remove that support by introducing Degrees of Freedom of movement that isn't accounted for in the calculations of building strength, and the whole thing comes crashing down. The uneven loading on the outer truss frame due to the impact site was transferred to the weakest area in the truss frame, which was at the top-most mechanical room floor below the fire. At mechanical room floors the building designers had inexplicably joined all truss frame members together at the same level, whereas on other floors the joins were staggered to increase strength. Thus that one-floor-join was greatly stressed by the uneven forces, and that caused the two small 5/8" bolts holding each truss frame section together to break. This means the entire top of the building above the top-most mechanical room floor below the fire had broken free of the confines of the floor spars and was wrenching on the central column, not just that area around the hole the aircraft had created. The entire top section of the truss frame of the building was ripped loose at that mechanical room floor. The top-hat truss (which provided horizontal support to the truss frame at the top of the building where there were no more floors) transmitted the uneven force from the truss frame to the central column, magnifying the buckling force the central column was subjected to. Thus, when the viscoelastic dampers between the floor spars and the lightweight truss frame melted in the area of the fire, the truss frame lost its horizontal means of support. It bowed and buckled (because it was weakened by the plane crashing through it and from the fire), meaning the floor spars lost their perimeter means of vertical support. The compromised floor spars and central column (weakened by the fire because that inferior spray-on insulation had been knocked off the central column by the force of the crash) then drooped and dragged the whole building down. Since the federal regulations changed mid-construction, the construction crews weren't allowed to finish the upper floors with asbestos fireproofing. They used the inferior spray-on fluffy shit that flakes off all on its own in a fire... and can easily be knocked off if you just hit it with your hand. I'm sure you can imagine how much of that shit got knocked off when the planes hit. Thus the central column, soaked in burning jet fuel, was no longer fireproofed. The central column metal didn't melt, but it got incandescently hot, easily hot enough to lose most of its strength. This happened because the WTC towers were specifically designed to minimize the amount of concrete used in their construction... so their heat capacity (and thus ability to absorb heat) was small. So the temperature of the structural components rose rapidly to the point they lost strength. The uneven forces being transmitted from the now-disconnected upper truss frame through the top-hat truss and into the central column, combined with the heat weakening the central column, made the central column buckle, transferring some of the weight of the building back onto the now broken (at the top-most mechanical room floor below the fire) truss frame. You can see in the videos the outer truss frame along one floor seems to collapse all at once immediately prior to the building collapsing... that was the mechanical room floor where the truss frame sections were all joined at one floor, creating a weak point in the outer truss frame. The 2 small 5/8" bolts holding each truss frame section together had already been broken by the uneven forces, ripping the upper portion of the truss frame free of the lower portion. The viscoelastic dampers had already been wrenched apart, the floor spars no longer had vertical support and drooped as much as 36" in the fire, the truss frame no longer had horizontal support and when the load got to be too much, the truss frame at the mechanical room floor simply collapsed. That collapse ripped apart even more viscoelastic dampers, and the whole-building collapse rapidly escalated from there, like a zipper unzipping or, as one eyewitness said, like a banana unpeeling. The "explosions" you kooks keep bleating about were from the central column buckling, and the floor spar / truss frame junctions through those melting / ripping viscoelastic dampers ripping loose. They were pre-tensioned to keep the outer truss frame horizontally loaded to counteract the bowing effect on the outer truss frame from the weight of the building, after all. When those viscoelastic dampers ripped loose, a lot of force was released. You'll note the top-most part of the building tilted a bit before it fell, just as a tree falls in the direction it's been cut. That slight angle dragged the rest of the building off-center as it collapsed, leaving behind your "surviving stairs" at the rear of the 'fall shadow' and providing proof that it was not a controlled collapse. It's simple engineering. That you take the route of believing in fanciful and impossible conspiracy scenarios, rather than examining the underlying engineering fundamentals as to why the buildings were, quite literally, designed (unintentionally) to fail in such a scenario (for which they'd received warnings to the same effect since 1971, and ignored), means your broken brain is too fragile to handle reality. And that's a SPNAK! on the conspiracy-theory kook. <snicker> ============================================================= Poor stupid Roger Wittekind... his broken little brain can't comprehend reality, so he has to glom onto these utterly impossible kooky conspiracy theories. That his insane mind can accept things which violate the laws of physics, yet steadfastly refuses to accept reality, proves Roger Wittekind is a schizophrenic paranoid-delusional kook off his meds. <snicker> -- Roger T.E. Wittekind PO Box 471 167 40th Avenue East Moline, IL 61244 309-755-6374 309-755-6394 Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East Moline, IL. Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Roget Wittekind. I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator" that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind. J) To explain away the lack of any evidence of your k'lame of a "nuclear terrorism era", your broken brain has conceived that your magical nukes are employing "Hushaboom technology" (your words) to silence them. IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | joeturn <joeturn2000@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-21 18:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3215fc77-dba9-487c-8937-42eb944938e7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #266833 |
On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 7:49:38 AM UTC-4, Andrew Nichols wrote: > ON that fateful day, September 11, 2001, your eyes deceived you. > Only those in the "know" knew the real evil that went on that day. > Truth is, there were no planes. > Truth is, there were shape shifting fallen angels. > The Bene Ha Elohim took down those three towers, 4 planes and punched a hole in the Pentagon. > > Video PROOF! > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bheSZJEm-YY > > Luke Nichols Gallop that brings to mine the story of April Gallop who says there were no planes as she walked out of the missile hole
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | seon <seongf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 14:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ad29012a-6ebc-4af8-8b96-ae2bde8db68b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #266833 |
I thought Luke wasn't going to post here anymore.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-10 09:01 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <r4eg1b11ta75thp05ldboqjlhhh8r9pb3t@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #269438 |
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 14:52:10 -0700 (PDT), seon <seongf@gmail.com> wrote: >I thought Luke wasn't going to post here anymore. He's not, right at this moment. He predicted the world would end on September 22. He even had a countdown clock. It didn't and he's run away again. He'll be back in a couple of weeks when he thinks we've forgotten about it. Shill #2 -- "He's a fake kook. I'm a real one." andrew luke nichols alt.conspiracy - 19 March 2012
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-10 04:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <l6nh1b1gmp077omk1al33cho6s0b1r1236@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #269439 |
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 09:01:30 +1100, Government Shill #2
<gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 14:52:10 -0700 (PDT), seon <seongf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I thought Luke wasn't going to post here anymore.
>
>He's not, right at this moment. He predicted the world would end on September
>22. He even had a countdown clock. It didn't and he's run away again.
>
>He'll be back in a couple of weeks when he thinks we've forgotten about it.
A pity I'm such a mean bastard who has a phenomenal, though not
perfect, memory :D
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-10 04:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <66nh1bdq5r7qe6ltbsj7btuv95bpgh8jsk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #269438 |
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 14:52:10 -0700 (PDT), seon <seongf@gmail.com>
wrote:
>I thought Luke wasn't going to post here anymore.
He's left a few times since I returned to the group. He'll be
back when his need for attention overrides his embarrassment regarding
his latest false prophecy.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 16 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 14 15 [16]
Back to top | Article view | alt.conspiracy
csiph-web