Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #289042 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-11 00:32 +0800 |
| Last post | 2017-03-21 03:58 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 70 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.conspiracy
[SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don’t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 00:32 +0800
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well Jason <jason_warren@ieee.DELETE.org> - 2017-03-16 07:33 -0400
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 20:18 +0800
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-03-16 09:03 -0400
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 22:06 +0800
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-03-16 10:59 -0400
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 00:59 +0800
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2017-03-16 12:41 -0400
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 01:00 +0800
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 04:15 -0500
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 21:53 +0800
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 16:18 -0500
Re: So no human could make a truly secured operating system? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 23:16 +0800
Re: So no human could make a truly secured operating system? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 11:37 -0500
Re: So no human could make a truly secured operating system? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 19:07 +0800
Re: So no human could make a truly secured operating system? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 07:53 -0500
Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 18:35 +0800
Re: write your own operating system single-handed? edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2017-03-20 05:12 -0700
Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 21:19 +0800
Re: write your own operating system single-handed? edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2017-03-20 09:11 -0700
Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 03:58 -0500
Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-03-21 09:17 -0300
Re: [OT] Who's really crazy? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 22:12 +0800
Re: [OT] Who's really crazy? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 03:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Are we in war? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 19:54 +0800
Re: [OT] Are we in war? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-03-22 21:18 -0300
Re: [OT] Are we in war? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 20:09 -0500
Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-21 08:12 -0700
write your own operating system single-handed? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-03-21 12:09 -0400
Re: write your own operating system single-handed? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-03-21 16:33 +0000
Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2017-03-21 13:21 -0400
Re: write your own operating system single-handed? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-03-21 14:18 -0400
Re: write your own operating system single-handed? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-03-21 19:26 +0000
Re: write your own operating system single-handed? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-03-21 16:17 -0300
Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 03:48 -0500
Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-22 10:44 +0100
Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 20:11 -0500
Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 19:56 +0800
Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 20:11 -0500
Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 02:13 +0800
Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 05:46 -0500
Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 19:55 +0800
Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 19:56 -0500
Re: write your own operating system single-handed? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-03-22 09:33 -0300
Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 22:25 +0800
Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 20:10 -0500
Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2017-03-22 11:30 -0400
Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 23:56 +0800
Re: write your own operating system single-handed? Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-03-21 08:52 -0400
Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 22:08 +0800
Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 03:49 -0500
Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 19:57 +0800
Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 20:09 -0500
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2017-03-17 20:06 -0700
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 18:12 +0800
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 08:53 -0500
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 23:03 +0800
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 11:37 -0500
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 20:03 +0800
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 03:49 -0500
Re: 33 years to write Windows 10? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 01:04 +0800
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2017-03-17 13:58 +0000
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 00:43 +0800
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 16:17 -0500
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 23:07 +0800
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2017-03-17 20:08 -0700
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 23:07 +0800
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 11:37 -0500
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 21:23 +0800
Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 03:58 -0500
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-11 00:32 +0800 |
| Subject | [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don’t come out well |
| Message-ID | <o9uk9s$24s$1@dont-email.me> |
CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don’t come out well Full story: http://www.scmp.com/tech/enterprises/article/2077242/cia-grades-anti-virus-programmes-some-dont-come-out-well?cx_tag=recommend_desktop#cxrecs_s Peppering the 8,000 pages of purported Central Intelligence Agency hacking data released Tuesday by WikiLeaks are reviews of some of the world’s most popular anti-virus products. The hackers are quoted taking potshots at anti-virus firms, suggesting the American intelligence agencies are keenly aware of flaws in the products meant to be keeping us all safe online. The data published by WikiLeaks isn’t systematic enough to draw firm conclusions about the reliability of one product or another and the uncertain dating means the CIA’s critiques provide more of a snapshot than an overview. Still, the posts show America’s top cyberspies aren’t always flattering about commonly used security software. * COMODO * KASPERSKY LAB * AVIRA * AVG * F-SECURE * BITDEFENDER -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jason <jason_warren@ieee.DELETE.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-16 07:33 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3330f2f3e7cb37f69896db@reader443.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #289042 |
In article <o9uk9s$24s$1@dont-email.me>, toylet.toylet@gmail.com says... > > * COMODO > * KASPERSKY LAB > * AVIRA > * AVG > * F-SECURE > * BITDEFENDER > > Symantec didn't make the list? Good for them :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-16 20:18 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well |
| Message-ID | <oadvle$n60$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #289287 |
On 16/03/2017 7:33 PM, Jason wrote: > In article <o9uk9s$24s$1@dont-email.me>, toylet.toylet@gmail.com says... >> >> * COMODO >> * KASPERSKY LAB >> * AVIRA >> * AVG >> * F-SECURE >> * BITDEFENDER > > Symantec didn't make the list? Good for them :) I don't think CIA knows how to write programs. SO... :) -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-16 09:03 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well |
| Message-ID | <oae28u$vnr$1@jstuckle.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #289288 |
On 3/16/2017 8:18 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: > On 16/03/2017 7:33 PM, Jason wrote: >> In article <o9uk9s$24s$1@dont-email.me>, toylet.toylet@gmail.com says... >>> >>> * COMODO >>> * KASPERSKY LAB >>> * AVIRA >>> * AVG >>> * F-SECURE >>> * BITDEFENDER >> >> Symantec didn't make the list? Good for them :) > > I don't think CIA knows how to write programs. SO... :) > The CIA is quite adept at writing programs. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle jstucklex@attglobal.net ==================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-16 22:06 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well |
| Message-ID | <oae5us$cr9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #289292 |
On 16/03/2017 9:03 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: > > The CIA is quite adept at writing programs. > Then tell CIA to rewrite Window$ 10 from scratch? :) -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-16 10:59 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well |
| Message-ID | <oae93g$np5$1@jstuckle.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #289295 |
On 3/16/2017 10:06 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: > On 16/03/2017 9:03 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >> >> The CIA is quite adept at writing programs. >> > > Then tell CIA to rewrite Window$ 10 from scratch? :) > That's not their job. Why don't you tell Microsoft to do it? Or do it yourself? -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle jstucklex@attglobal.net ==================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-17 00:59 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well |
| Message-ID | <oaeg46$jim$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #289296 |
On 16/03/2017 10:59 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >> >> Then tell CIA to rewrite Window$ 10 from scratch? :) > > That's not their job. Why don't you tell Microsoft to do it? Or do it > yourself? Aren't Americans supposed to believe in and trust CIA more than Micro$oft? ;) -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-16 12:41 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well |
| Message-ID | <oaef1r$f4h$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #289295 |
On 3/16/2017 10:06 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: > On 16/03/2017 9:03 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >> >> The CIA is quite adept at writing programs. >> > > Then tell CIA to rewrite Window$ 10 from scratch? :) Do they also get 33 years to do it? -- Kenneth Brody
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-17 01:00 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well |
| Message-ID | <oaeg6n$jim$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #289297 |
On 17/03/2017 12:41 AM, Ken Brody wrote: >> >> Then tell CIA to rewrite Window$ 10 from scratch? :) > > Do they also get 33 years to do it? > They could confiscate others' properties including source codes from Micro$oft, I supposed.... :) Anyway, Window$ 10 had too many new features that many don't care about nor need. -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-17 04:15 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well |
| Message-ID | <j8anccd1g0k3nnelrqs4afv4jkddgrtgrk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #289299 |
On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 01:00:52 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
<toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 17/03/2017 12:41 AM, Ken Brody wrote:
>>>
>>> Then tell CIA to rewrite Window$ 10 from scratch? :)
>>
>> Do they also get 33 years to do it?
>>
>
>They could confiscate others' properties including source codes from
>Micro$oft, I supposed.... :)
>
>Anyway, Window$ 10 had too many new features that many don't care about
>nor need.
So don't use them. Problem solved.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-17 21:53 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well |
| Message-ID | <oagpjm$j79$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #289326 |
On 17/03/2017 5:15 PM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >> >> Anyway, Window$ 10 had too many new features that many don't care about >> nor need. > > So don't use them. Problem solved. I want them removable and erasable, not even a scratch is left! -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-17 16:18 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well |
| Message-ID | <8jkocc1cr7bamuka87aeb1bpccpm9el91t@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #289335 |
On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 21:53:40 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
<toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 17/03/2017 5:15 PM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>
>>> Anyway, Window$ 10 had too many new features that many don't care about
>>> nor need.
>>
>> So don't use them. Problem solved.
>
>I want them removable and erasable, not even a scratch is left!
Then make your own operating system with only the features you
want. If you use an OS made by someone else, you're stuck with what
they give you.
And, of course, you're not obligated to use anything from
Microsoft. I like Ubuntu and make use of it frequently, though not for
Usenet.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-18 23:16 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: So no human could make a truly secured operating system? |
| Message-ID | <oajiqh$98h$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #289347 |
On 18/03/2017 5:18 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >> >> I want them removable and erasable, not even a scratch is left! > > Then make your own operating system with only the features you > want. If you use an OS made by someone else, you're stuck with what > they give you. Few have the time nor resources to do that. > And, of course, you're not obligated to use anything from > Microsoft. I like Ubuntu and make use of it frequently, though not for > Usenet. I agree. Let's cut the wires? And the funding as well? :) -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-18 11:37 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: So no human could make a truly secured operating system? |
| Message-ID | <rioqccl93p0j4fpp7hqcp7eo04nsbamspn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #289388 |
On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 23:16:15 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
<toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
Stop making new threads for your replies. Either reply within the
initial thread, or don't reply.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-19 19:07 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: So no human could make a truly secured operating system? |
| Message-ID | <oalokl$qp9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #289393 |
On 19/03/2017 12:37 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 23:16:15 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" > <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: > > [...] > > Stop making new threads for your replies. Either reply within the > initial thread, or don't reply. > Could you write a 100% secured OS then? Don't just question and challenge me. :) -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-19 07:53 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: So no human could make a truly secured operating system? |
| Message-ID | <movsccho43skd0q35pfdn2mtidukujbqp2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #289401 |
On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 19:07:47 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
<toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 19/03/2017 12:37 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 23:16:15 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
>> <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Stop making new threads for your replies. Either reply within the
>> initial thread, or don't reply.
>>
>
>Could you write a 100% secured OS then? Don't just question and
>challenge me. :)
I am happy with WIN 10, Ubuntu and Mint, so there is no need for
me to do so. Not that it would matter. I lack the knowledge necessary
to make an OS.
I will question and challenge you. Contrary to your delusion, you
have NO control over what others do.
What is at the root of your belief that you have this authority
over others?
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-20 18:35 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: write your own operating system single-handed? |
| Message-ID | <oaob3t$277$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #289407 |
On 19/03/2017 8:53 PM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > I am happy with WIN 10, Ubuntu and Mint, so there is no need for > me to do so. Not that it would matter. I lack the knowledge necessary > to make an OS. > I will question and challenge you. Contrary to your delusion, you > have NO control over what others do. > What is at the root of your belief that you have this authority > over others? > > Your lack of evidence is noted. Since your claim is not > true, you couldn't offer any. > Make your own operating system. If you're not willing > to do that, then just shut up about it. That task will require eternal life and infinite time to do so, giving the amount of time and resourced consumed by Micro$oft and other US companies. -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | edrhodes@hotmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-20 05:12 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: write your own operating system single-handed? |
| Message-ID | <1f0c3e5e-468c-4865-9a7c-3791620a65a5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #289437 |
On 19/03/2017 8:53 PM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > I am happy with WIN 10, Ubuntu and Mint, so there is no need for > me to do so. Not that it would matter. I lack the knowledge necessary > to make an OS. > I will question and challenge you. Contrary to your delusion, you > have NO control over what others do. > What is at the root of your belief that you have this authority > over others? > > Your lack of evidence is noted. Since your claim is not > true, you couldn't offer any. > Make your own operating system. If you're not willing > to do that, then just shut up about it. That task will require eternal life and infinite time to do so, giving the amount of time and resourced consumed by Micro$oft and other US companies. ***** Dude! All it's going to take is a computer with an M/L compiler and the talent to write code. Granted, your code WILL probably conflict with copyrights held by Microsoft or Apple, but if you're using it for your own purposes, there would be no problem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-20 21:19 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: write your own operating system single-handed? |
| Message-ID | <oaokoe$443$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #289439 |
On 20/03/2017 8:12 PM, edrhodes@hotmail.com wrote: > > That task will require eternal life and infinite time to do so, giving > the amount of time and resourced consumed by Micro$oft and other US > companies. > ***** > Dude! All it's going to take is a computer with an M/L compiler and the talent to write code. Granted, your code WILL probably conflict with copyrights held by Microsoft or Apple, but if you're using it for your own purposes, there would be no problem. You also need some hardware and corresponding drivers that don't cheat! Otherwise, whatever you do with the operating system is just a total waste of effort and time. -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | edrhodes@hotmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-20 09:11 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: write your own operating system single-handed? |
| Message-ID | <79428cd4-ba81-458b-80aa-bf1849655cee@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #289441 |
On 20/03/2017 8:12 PM, edrh...@hotmail.com wrote: > > That task will require eternal life and infinite time to do so, giving > the amount of time and resourced consumed by Micro$oft and other US > companies. > ***** > Dude! All it's going to take is a computer with an M/L compiler and the talent to write code. Granted, your code WILL probably conflict with copyrights held by Microsoft or Apple, but if you're using it for your own purposes, there would be no problem. You also need some hardware and corresponding drivers that don't cheat! Otherwise, whatever you do with the operating system is just a total waste of effort and time. -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa ***** What hardware other than the computer? (Monitor, modem and printers I guess.) If you're up to writing your own OP, whipping out drivers to go with it shouldn't be too much of a chore.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.conspiracy
csiph-web