Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #260161 > unrolled thread
| Started by | EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-06-15 14:13 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-06-19 04:25 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 174 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.conspiracy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-15 14:13 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-15 17:22 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-15 15:44 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 09:24 +1000
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-15 19:46 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 19:12 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 23:14 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 03:32 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 03:32 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-16 17:16 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-17 01:32 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 12:27 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-17 20:48 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-17 17:29 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-17 20:52 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-17 20:58 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 03:59 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-18 08:06 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-18 11:18 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-18 08:33 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 15:00 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-18 17:56 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 21:26 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 19:19 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-18 22:19 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 14:59 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-18 09:34 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 03:58 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-18 07:44 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 14:59 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-18 17:34 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-18 18:44 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 21:28 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-18 20:03 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-19 04:28 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-19 21:07 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 04:01 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-20 13:19 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 15:37 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 15:51 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-20 20:21 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-06-21 16:55 +1000
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-21 05:27 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 07:07 +1000
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 03:48 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-21 10:25 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 07:08 +1000
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-22 15:37 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-22 19:05 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-22 16:31 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 19:11 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-22 17:29 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-22 20:54 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-22 18:07 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-22 23:08 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-22 22:13 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-23 02:34 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-23 10:24 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-24 03:16 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-23 11:46 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-23 16:21 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-24 03:17 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-23 11:13 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-24 03:18 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-23 16:15 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-24 03:18 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-23 13:00 -0400
Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-23 16:02 -0400
Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-06-24 07:33 +1000
Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-23 18:14 -0400
Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-06-24 10:47 +1000
Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-23 18:16 -0400
Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-06-24 10:48 +1000
Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-23 22:14 -0400
Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-06-24 12:53 +1000
Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-24 03:14 -0500
Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-06-25 11:11 +1000
Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-25 04:06 -0500
Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-06-25 05:12 -0700
Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-25 15:17 -0500
Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-06-25 05:16 -0700
Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-25 15:17 -0500
Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-06-27 10:01 -0700
Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-27 14:57 -0500
Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-23 21:58 -0400
Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-23 22:15 -0400
Re: Chronic nonbacterial prostatitis. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-23 22:11 -0400
Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-24 03:13 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-23 02:32 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-23 16:30 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-24 03:20 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-25 14:26 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-06-26 07:36 +1000
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-26 04:18 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-26 20:29 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-27 04:29 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-27 14:13 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-28 04:21 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-28 03:48 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-28 11:23 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-28 10:35 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-04 16:58 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-04 23:00 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-05 08:13 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-05 10:52 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-05 10:46 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 07:07 +1000
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-05 14:44 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-06 00:06 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 04:06 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-06 11:21 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 15:16 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-10 01:49 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 04:46 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-10 03:53 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-10 12:24 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 15:31 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-12 17:12 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 03:10 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-13 11:41 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 16:37 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-13 22:54 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 04:17 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-13 23:19 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 04:19 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-14 01:31 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 04:21 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-14 09:24 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-14 15:45 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 15:56 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-14 22:59 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 04:47 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-16 08:17 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 15:39 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-14 15:54 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-14 21:39 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 16:04 +1000
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-14 23:40 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 12:55 +0200
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 15:32 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-07-12 09:53 +0200
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-12 05:45 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 08:16 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-07-10 16:10 +0000
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 14:22 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 16:13 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 15:32 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-05 06:07 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-26 10:53 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-06-27 09:39 +1000
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-27 10:18 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-27 14:55 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-06-28 10:25 +1000
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-28 04:22 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-06-29 07:17 +1000
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-28 18:19 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-26 04:17 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-24 03:21 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-23 02:31 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-23 16:26 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-24 03:19 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-23 02:30 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-22 20:51 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-23 02:32 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-06-23 09:12 +1000
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 19:11 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-21 05:24 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-18 22:23 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-19 20:45 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 04:00 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-06-20 10:50 -0400
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 21:25 -0500
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-18 20:00 -0700
Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-19 04:25 -0500
Page 5 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | edrhodes@hotmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-25 05:16 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. |
| Message-ID | <68616c63-7b3e-47b1-bb44-af44d5b7dacc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #260875 |
> >>Say, where is Ernie?
> >
> > He's supposedly in Canada. He was supposed to meet Ed at the mall
> >in Ed's town, but he didn't show. No one was or is surprised by this.
> >On the plus side, we got to see video of Ed waiting.
> > I mostly listened while doing other things, since watching Ed
> >wait is not as exciting as you might think. I was fortunate enough to
> >be watching when he did one of his card tricks.
> > Usually I can figure out how a magician does the trick. The one I
> >saw, where Ed counts out the top few cards and the face matches the
> >number he gave, stumped me.
Henry Hay ("The Amateur Magician's Handbook") said we should never trust a spectator's remembering of the specifics of a trick because they tend to filter it through their own thought processes. Actually, what you describe is not what I did, but thanks for saying I "stumped you."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-25 15:17 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. |
| Message-ID | <6eoooa94l0egdjep76534n27qgvhpifpua@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #260902 |
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 05:16:42 -0700 (PDT), edrhodes@hotmail.com wrote:
>> >>Say, where is Ernie?
>> >
>> > He's supposedly in Canada. He was supposed to meet Ed at the mall
>> >in Ed's town, but he didn't show. No one was or is surprised by this.
>> >On the plus side, we got to see video of Ed waiting.
>> > I mostly listened while doing other things, since watching Ed
>> >wait is not as exciting as you might think. I was fortunate enough to
>> >be watching when he did one of his card tricks.
>> > Usually I can figure out how a magician does the trick. The one I
>> >saw, where Ed counts out the top few cards and the face matches the
>> >number he gave, stumped me.
>
>Henry Hay ("The Amateur Magician's Handbook") said we should never trust
>a spectator's remembering of the specifics of a trick because they tend to
>filter it through their own thought processes. Actually, what you describe is
>not what I did, but thanks for saying I "stumped you."
I'll watch the video again, but as I recall, you would say the
number and it would match the number on the specific card.
You did stump me. There is no way for me to honestly deny this.
I figured out the thimble trick as you were doing it.
A few years ago I had a trick deck. Some of the cards were
slightly shorter than the others. The shorter ones were all regular
while the longer ones were all seven of hearts. The trick was to have
someone pick a card. It would always be one of the seven of hearts, of
course. Then I would have them place the card in the deck in a random
place. I'd tap the deck and ask, "Did you see me remove your card, or
was I too fast?" I would then remove a seven of hearts from my pocket.
I don't think anyone ever figured it out.
That is the beginning, middle and end of my magic career :)
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | edrhodes@hotmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-27 10:01 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. |
| Message-ID | <bf77637a-0562-469c-a59e-c0f238beff43@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #260911 |
On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 4:17:30 PM UTC-4, K Wills wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 05:16:42 -0700 (PDT), edrhodes@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> >> >>Say, where is Ernie?
> >> >
> >> > He's supposedly in Canada. He was supposed to meet Ed at the mall
> >> >in Ed's town, but he didn't show. No one was or is surprised by this.
> >> >On the plus side, we got to see video of Ed waiting.
> >> > I mostly listened while doing other things, since watching Ed
> >> >wait is not as exciting as you might think. I was fortunate enough to
> >> >be watching when he did one of his card tricks.
> >> > Usually I can figure out how a magician does the trick. The one I
> >> >saw, where Ed counts out the top few cards and the face matches the
> >> >number he gave, stumped me.
> >
> >Henry Hay ("The Amateur Magician's Handbook") said we should never trust
> >a spectator's remembering of the specifics of a trick because they tend to
> >filter it through their own thought processes. Actually, what you describe is
> >not what I did, but thanks for saying I "stumped you."
>
> I'll watch the video again, but as I recall, you would say the
> number and it would match the number on the specific card.
> You did stump me. There is no way for me to honestly deny this.
> I figured out the thimble trick as you were doing it.
> A few years ago I had a trick deck. Some of the cards were
> slightly shorter than the others. The shorter ones were all regular
> while the longer ones were all seven of hearts. The trick was to have
> someone pick a card. It would always be one of the seven of hearts, of
> course. Then I would have them place the card in the deck in a random
> place. I'd tap the deck and ask, "Did you see me remove your card, or
> was I too fast?" I would then remove a seven of hearts from my pocket.
> I don't think anyone ever figured it out.
> That is the beginning, middle and end of my magic career :)
>
> --
> Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
> counselor.
You had a Svengali Deck. I used to have one of those. The trick was that I showed six cards. Ace through Three of Hearts, Four through Six of Clubs. They were in order. I scrambled them so they were mixed, Black, Red, Black, Red, Black, Red. Then I put the bottom card of the packet on top of the packet, did that six times. Snapped the cards and they'd separated back into Ace through Six divided Red and Black. I'm sorry the thimble thing didn't work.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-27 14:57 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. |
| Message-ID | <fvvtoa1v40f4ejstqminpdsh3ep3ko95mp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #261032 |
On Sat, 27 Jun 2015 10:01:51 -0700 (PDT), edrhodes@hotmail.com wrote:
>On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 4:17:30 PM UTC-4, K Wills wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 05:16:42 -0700 (PDT), edrhodes@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >> >>Say, where is Ernie?
>> >> >
>> >> > He's supposedly in Canada. He was supposed to meet Ed at the mall
>> >> >in Ed's town, but he didn't show. No one was or is surprised by this.
>> >> >On the plus side, we got to see video of Ed waiting.
>> >> > I mostly listened while doing other things, since watching Ed
>> >> >wait is not as exciting as you might think. I was fortunate enough to
>> >> >be watching when he did one of his card tricks.
>> >> > Usually I can figure out how a magician does the trick. The one I
>> >> >saw, where Ed counts out the top few cards and the face matches the
>> >> >number he gave, stumped me.
>> >
>> >Henry Hay ("The Amateur Magician's Handbook") said we should never trust
>> >a spectator's remembering of the specifics of a trick because they tend to
>> >filter it through their own thought processes. Actually, what you describe is
>> >not what I did, but thanks for saying I "stumped you."
>>
>> I'll watch the video again, but as I recall, you would say the
>> number and it would match the number on the specific card.
>> You did stump me. There is no way for me to honestly deny this.
>> I figured out the thimble trick as you were doing it.
>> A few years ago I had a trick deck. Some of the cards were
>> slightly shorter than the others. The shorter ones were all regular
>> while the longer ones were all seven of hearts. The trick was to have
>> someone pick a card. It would always be one of the seven of hearts, of
>> course. Then I would have them place the card in the deck in a random
>> place. I'd tap the deck and ask, "Did you see me remove your card, or
>> was I too fast?" I would then remove a seven of hearts from my pocket.
>> I don't think anyone ever figured it out.
>> That is the beginning, middle and end of my magic career :)
>>
>> --
>> Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
>> counselor.
>
>You had a Svengali Deck.
Yes! I couldn't recall the name, and was too lazy to look it up.
>I used to have one of those. The trick was that I showed six cards.
>Ace through Three of Hearts, Four through Six of Clubs. They were in
>order. I scrambled them so they were mixed, Black, Red, Black, Red,
>Black, Red. Then I put the bottom card of the packet on top of the
>packet, did that six times. Snapped the cards and they'd separated
>back into Ace through Six divided Red and Black. I'm sorry the thimble
>thing didn't work.
That was the trick. I'm still working on figuring it out.
Don't be sorry. More often than not I am able to figure out the
trick. For me, figuring them out is more fun than the original
illusions.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-23 21:58 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. |
| Message-ID | <09oix.29417$rw5.19174@fx11.iad> |
| In reply to | #260775 |
On 06/23/2015 04:02 PM, BDK wrote:
> In article <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.23{1.56A.Seattle.2015}>, Jeff-Relf.Me <@.>
> says...
>>
>> <PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A !important;'><big><big>Â
>> At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful.
>
> Painful? Damn. I'm older than you, and have no pain when I pee. Never
> had. I just texted a friend of mine, who is 67, and he said "If it hurts
> when he pisses, something else is wrong". I agree.
STDs.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-23 22:15 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.2ff3dcc85c5d538698c14c@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #260805 |
In article <09oix.29417$rw5.19174@fx11.iad>, nobody@gmail.com says...
>
> On 06/23/2015 04:02 PM, BDK wrote:
> > In article <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.23{1.56A.Seattle.2015}>, Jeff-Relf.Me <@.>
> > says...
> >>
> >> <PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A !important;'><big><big>Â
> >> At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful.
> >
> > Painful? Damn. I'm older than you, and have no pain when I pee. Never
> > had. I just texted a friend of mine, who is 67, and he said "If it hurts
> > when he pisses, something else is wrong". I agree.
>
> STDs.
Well no, that's not what causes most of it, but a good guess.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, and future Psychotronic World Dominator.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-23 22:11 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Chronic nonbacterial prostatitis. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.2ff3dbc8b39f38b898c14a@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #260775 |
In article <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.23{2.53P.Seattle.2015}>, Jeff-Relf.Me <@.>
says...
>
> <PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A !important;'><big><big>ÂÂ
> You (BDK) replied (to me):
> > > At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful.
> >
> > Painful? Damn. I'm older than you, and have no pain when I pee.
> > Never had. I just texted a friend of mine, who is 67,
> > and he said "If it hurts when he pisses, something else is wrong".
> > I agree.
>
> It's called "Chronic nonbacterial prostatitis"; see:
> http://www.healthline.com/health/prostatitis-nonbacterial-chronic
>
> In my case, the prostate is simply tender (no other symptoms);
> masturbating makes peeing more painful.
>
> There is no cure, "relaxation" helps.
That's so sad, sorry you're going through that.
I have a friend who is 63 and going through a horrible deal with his,
and needs it yanked out, he has to wear a pee bag and catheterize
himself. I would have had mine yanked long ago, regardless of the risk
of sexual dysfunction.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, and future Psychotronic World Dominator.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-24 03:13 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful. |
| Message-ID | <nkpkoahbkra2pv8eqjvoguh7iofuhtmnl6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #260775 |
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:02:39 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:
>In article <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.23{1.56A.Seattle.2015}>, Jeff-Relf.Me <@.>
>says...
>>
>> <PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A !important;'><big><big>ÂÂ
>> At my age, 55, masturbating makes peeing more painful.
>
>Painful? Damn. I'm older than you, and have no pain when I pee. Never
>had. I just texted a friend of mine, who is 67, and he said "If it hurts
>when he pisses, something else is wrong". I agree.
It's a sign of gonorrhea, though painful urination can be caused
by many other problems.
Jeff should make an appointment with his doctor to discuss the
matter. Maybe get a referral to a urologist.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-23 02:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <or2ioa15ja5ts6gajb1fvehreup1oordbn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #260694 |
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:07:50 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
>>>>> Personality and Individual Differences, Sept '14
>>>> Awwwww. You've got a crush on BDK.
>>>> I don't think he's into S&M, based on his previous comments.
>>>> There's nothing to suggest he'll ever return your sexual desires.
>>>> Looks like another night of 'whacking the flounder' for you,
>>> To quote from "Internet Trolls Are Narcissists, Psychopaths, and
>>> Sadists," Psychology Today, Sept '14: "Trolls will lie, exaggerate, and
>>> offend to get a response" and that's you full on Aspie troll boy.
>>
>> We're just being bluntly truthful about you.
>
>Yeah, you're also one sick lying mutherfucker.
>
Again you try to use projection. It's not working.
>>> Yeah, you're one sick mutherfucker, but just for your info I'm celibate
>>> unlike those hypocritical kiddie fucking priests.
>>
>> Are you claiming you don't masturbate? BWHAHAHAHAHAHA! Funny, but sad,
>> too.
>
>I guess that's an admission on your part that you do; me, I'm celibate.
>
Even prostitutes want nothing to do with you. We got it.
>>> You got a lot of crawling to do before you can even begin to think of
>>> being forgiven.
>>
>>
>> I don't think he's worried about it any more than I am.
>
>I hadn't included you in that but if you insist.
Oh doom!
Will Serapis once again prove how incompetent he is by causing an
earthquake in an area unrelated to BDK?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-23 16:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.2ff38bfc83e0dd8498c145@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #260714 |
In article <or2ioa15ja5ts6gajb1fvehreup1oordbn@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:07:50 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote: > > [...] > > >>>>> Personality and Individual Differences, Sept '14 > >>>> Awwwww. You've got a crush on BDK. > >>>> I don't think he's into S&M, based on his previous comments. > >>>> There's nothing to suggest he'll ever return your sexual desires. > >>>> Looks like another night of 'whacking the flounder' for you, > >>> To quote from "Internet Trolls Are Narcissists, Psychopaths, and > >>> Sadists," Psychology Today, Sept '14: "Trolls will lie, exaggerate, and > >>> offend to get a response" and that's you full on Aspie troll boy. > >> > >> We're just being bluntly truthful about you. > > > >Yeah, you're also one sick lying mutherfucker. > > > > Again you try to use projection. It's not working. > > >>> Yeah, you're one sick mutherfucker, but just for your info I'm celibate > >>> unlike those hypocritical kiddie fucking priests. > >> > >> Are you claiming you don't masturbate? BWHAHAHAHAHAHA! Funny, but sad, > >> too. > > > >I guess that's an admission on your part that you do; me, I'm celibate. > > > > Even prostitutes want nothing to do with you. We got it. > > >>> You got a lot of crawling to do before you can even begin to think of > >>> being forgiven. > >> > >> > >> I don't think he's worried about it any more than I am. > > > >I hadn't included you in that but if you insist. > > Oh doom! > Will Serapis once again prove how incompetent he is by causing an > earthquake in an area unrelated to BDK? If he got within 1000 miles I would be impressed. Well, no. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, and future Psychotronic World Dominator. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-24 03:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <k0qkoapa01c5ojjv528494ifr98tqvmi32@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #260779 |
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:30:43 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:
>In article <or2ioa15ja5ts6gajb1fvehreup1oordbn@4ax.com>,
>compuelf@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:07:50 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >>>>> Personality and Individual Differences, Sept '14
>> >>>> Awwwww. You've got a crush on BDK.
>> >>>> I don't think he's into S&M, based on his previous comments.
>> >>>> There's nothing to suggest he'll ever return your sexual desires.
>> >>>> Looks like another night of 'whacking the flounder' for you,
>> >>> To quote from "Internet Trolls Are Narcissists, Psychopaths, and
>> >>> Sadists," Psychology Today, Sept '14: "Trolls will lie, exaggerate, and
>> >>> offend to get a response" and that's you full on Aspie troll boy.
>> >>
>> >> We're just being bluntly truthful about you.
>> >
>> >Yeah, you're also one sick lying mutherfucker.
>>
>> Again you try to use projection. It's not working.
>>
>> >>> Yeah, you're one sick mutherfucker, but just for your info I'm celibate
>> >>> unlike those hypocritical kiddie fucking priests.
>> >>
>> >> Are you claiming you don't masturbate? BWHAHAHAHAHAHA! Funny, but sad,
>> >> too.
>> >
>> >I guess that's an admission on your part that you do; me, I'm celibate.
>>
>> Even prostitutes want nothing to do with you. We got it.
>>
>> >>> You got a lot of crawling to do before you can even begin to think of
>> >>> being forgiven.
>> >>
>> >> I don't think he's worried about it any more than I am.
>> >
>> >I hadn't included you in that but if you insist.
>>
>> Oh doom!
>> Will Serapis once again prove how incompetent he is by causing an
>> earthquake in an area unrelated to BDK?
>
>If he got within 1000 miles I would be impressed. Well, no.
If Alan wishes to impress me, he should get Serapis to cause an
earthquake in the Des Moines, Iowa metro area. Since we're not on a
fault line, this would be very impressive.
I'd issue another monetary challenge, but I don't know if he can
handle being proved a failure again.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-25 14:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mmhrmp$7tp$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #260830 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:30:43 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> > wrote: > >> In article <or2ioa15ja5ts6gajb1fvehreup1oordbn@4ax.com>, >> compuelf@gmail.com says... >>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:07:50 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>>>>>> Personality and Individual Differences, Sept '14 >>>>>>> Awwwww. You've got a crush on BDK. >>>>>>> I don't think he's into S&M, based on his previous comments. >>>>>>> There's nothing to suggest he'll ever return your sexual desires. >>>>>>> Looks like another night of 'whacking the flounder' for you, >>>>>> To quote from "Internet Trolls Are Narcissists, Psychopaths, and >>>>>> Sadists," Psychology Today, Sept '14: "Trolls will lie, exaggerate, and >>>>>> offend to get a response" and that's you full on Aspie troll boy. >>>>> We're just being bluntly truthful about you. >>>> Yeah, you're also one sick lying mutherfucker. >>> Again you try to use projection. It's not working. >>> >>>>>> Yeah, you're one sick mutherfucker, but just for your info I'm celibate >>>>>> unlike those hypocritical kiddie fucking priests. >>>>> Are you claiming you don't masturbate? BWHAHAHAHAHAHA! Funny, but sad, >>>>> too. >>>> I guess that's an admission on your part that you do; me, I'm celibate. >>> Even prostitutes want nothing to do with you. We got it. >>> >>>>>> You got a lot of crawling to do before you can even begin to think of >>>>>> being forgiven. >>>>> I don't think he's worried about it any more than I am. >>>> I hadn't included you in that but if you insist. >>> Oh doom! >>> Will Serapis once again prove how incompetent he is by causing an >>> earthquake in an area unrelated to BDK? >> If he got within 1000 miles I would be impressed. Well, no. > > If Alan wishes to impress me, he should get Serapis to cause an > earthquake in the Des Moines, Iowa metro area. Since we're not on a > fault line, this would be very impressive. > I'd issue another monetary challenge, but I don't know if he can > handle being proved a failure again. > Nah, it looks Lord Serapis sent you rain, lots of it and lightning. http://whotv.com/2015/06/25/check-out-these-rainfall-reports-from-across-iowa/ Called down the thunder, did yeh? When your neighbors realize what you've done you might want to think about moving or changing your name. -- Abrahamic religions are Pharaonic co-option schemes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-26 07:36 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <q2tooadqinv41av2f1ifhgpsnr8am10gkn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #260921 |
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:26:47 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote: >K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >> On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:30:43 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> >> wrote: >> >>> In article <or2ioa15ja5ts6gajb1fvehreup1oordbn@4ax.com>, >>> compuelf@gmail.com says... >>>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:07:50 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> >>>>>>>>> Personality and Individual Differences, Sept '14 >>>>>>>> Awwwww. You've got a crush on BDK. >>>>>>>> I don't think he's into S&M, based on his previous comments. >>>>>>>> There's nothing to suggest he'll ever return your sexual desires. >>>>>>>> Looks like another night of 'whacking the flounder' for you, >>>>>>> To quote from "Internet Trolls Are Narcissists, Psychopaths, and >>>>>>> Sadists," Psychology Today, Sept '14: "Trolls will lie, exaggerate, and >>>>>>> offend to get a response" and that's you full on Aspie troll boy. >>>>>> We're just being bluntly truthful about you. >>>>> Yeah, you're also one sick lying mutherfucker. >>>> Again you try to use projection. It's not working. >>>> >>>>>>> Yeah, you're one sick mutherfucker, but just for your info I'm celibate >>>>>>> unlike those hypocritical kiddie fucking priests. >>>>>> Are you claiming you don't masturbate? BWHAHAHAHAHAHA! Funny, but sad, >>>>>> too. >>>>> I guess that's an admission on your part that you do; me, I'm celibate. >>>> Even prostitutes want nothing to do with you. We got it. >>>> >>>>>>> You got a lot of crawling to do before you can even begin to think of >>>>>>> being forgiven. >>>>>> I don't think he's worried about it any more than I am. >>>>> I hadn't included you in that but if you insist. >>>> Oh doom! >>>> Will Serapis once again prove how incompetent he is by causing an >>>> earthquake in an area unrelated to BDK? >>> If he got within 1000 miles I would be impressed. Well, no. >> >> If Alan wishes to impress me, he should get Serapis to cause an >> earthquake in the Des Moines, Iowa metro area. Since we're not on a >> fault line, this would be very impressive. >> I'd issue another monetary challenge, but I don't know if he can >> handle being proved a failure again. >> > >Nah, it looks Lord Serapis sent you rain, lots of it and lightning. > >http://whotv.com/2015/06/25/check-out-these-rainfall-reports-from-across-iowa/ > >Called down the thunder, did yeh? When your neighbors realize what >you've done you might want to think about moving or changing your name. Thunderstorms? In summer? Amazing! Shill #2 -- A man without religion is like a fish without a bicycle. Vique
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-26 04:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <h56qoa1h4tg22hfs2dc693750bj2c0to5n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #260923 |
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 07:36:54 +1000, Government Shill #2
<gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:26:47 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:30:43 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <or2ioa15ja5ts6gajb1fvehreup1oordbn@4ax.com>,
>>>> compuelf@gmail.com says...
>>>>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:07:50 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Personality and Individual Differences, Sept '14
>>>>>>>>> Awwwww. You've got a crush on BDK.
>>>>>>>>> I don't think he's into S&M, based on his previous comments.
>>>>>>>>> There's nothing to suggest he'll ever return your sexual desires.
>>>>>>>>> Looks like another night of 'whacking the flounder' for you,
>>>>>>>> To quote from "Internet Trolls Are Narcissists, Psychopaths, and
>>>>>>>> Sadists," Psychology Today, Sept '14: "Trolls will lie, exaggerate, and
>>>>>>>> offend to get a response" and that's you full on Aspie troll boy.
>>>>>>> We're just being bluntly truthful about you.
>>>>>> Yeah, you're also one sick lying mutherfucker.
>>>>> Again you try to use projection. It's not working.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah, you're one sick mutherfucker, but just for your info I'm celibate
>>>>>>>> unlike those hypocritical kiddie fucking priests.
>>>>>>> Are you claiming you don't masturbate? BWHAHAHAHAHAHA! Funny, but sad,
>>>>>>> too.
>>>>>> I guess that's an admission on your part that you do; me, I'm celibate.
>>>>> Even prostitutes want nothing to do with you. We got it.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You got a lot of crawling to do before you can even begin to think of
>>>>>>>> being forgiven.
>>>>>>> I don't think he's worried about it any more than I am.
>>>>>> I hadn't included you in that but if you insist.
>>>>> Oh doom!
>>>>> Will Serapis once again prove how incompetent he is by causing an
>>>>> earthquake in an area unrelated to BDK?
>>>> If he got within 1000 miles I would be impressed. Well, no.
>>>
>>> If Alan wishes to impress me, he should get Serapis to cause an
>>> earthquake in the Des Moines, Iowa metro area. Since we're not on a
>>> fault line, this would be very impressive.
>>> I'd issue another monetary challenge, but I don't know if he can
>>> handle being proved a failure again.
>>>
>>
>>Nah, it looks Lord Serapis sent you rain, lots of it and lightning.
>>
>>http://whotv.com/2015/06/25/check-out-these-rainfall-reports-from-across-iowa/
>>
>>Called down the thunder, did yeh? When your neighbors realize what
>>you've done you might want to think about moving or changing your name.
>
>
>Thunderstorms? In summer? Amazing!
And NOT the earthquake I requested.
Rain was in the forecast well before I made my post. As such, my
challenge can't be connected.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-26 20:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mml5bp$bcm$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #260946 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 07:36:54 +1000, Government Shill #2 > <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:26:47 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:30:43 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <or2ioa15ja5ts6gajb1fvehreup1oordbn@4ax.com>, >>>>> compuelf@gmail.com says... >>>>>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:07:50 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> [...] >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Personality and Individual Differences, Sept '14 >>>>>>>>>> Awwwww. You've got a crush on BDK. >>>>>>>>>> I don't think he's into S&M, based on his previous comments. >>>>>>>>>> There's nothing to suggest he'll ever return your sexual desires. >>>>>>>>>> Looks like another night of 'whacking the flounder' for you, >>>>>>>>> To quote from "Internet Trolls Are Narcissists, Psychopaths, and >>>>>>>>> Sadists," Psychology Today, Sept '14: "Trolls will lie, exaggerate, and >>>>>>>>> offend to get a response" and that's you full on Aspie troll boy. >>>>>>>> We're just being bluntly truthful about you. >>>>>>> Yeah, you're also one sick lying mutherfucker. >>>>>> Again you try to use projection. It's not working. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yeah, you're one sick mutherfucker, but just for your info I'm celibate >>>>>>>>> unlike those hypocritical kiddie fucking priests. >>>>>>>> Are you claiming you don't masturbate? BWHAHAHAHAHAHA! Funny, but sad, >>>>>>>> too. >>>>>>> I guess that's an admission on your part that you do; me, I'm celibate. >>>>>> Even prostitutes want nothing to do with you. We got it. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You got a lot of crawling to do before you can even begin to think of >>>>>>>>> being forgiven. >>>>>>>> I don't think he's worried about it any more than I am. >>>>>>> I hadn't included you in that but if you insist. >>>>>> Oh doom! >>>>>> Will Serapis once again prove how incompetent he is by causing an >>>>>> earthquake in an area unrelated to BDK? >>>>> If he got within 1000 miles I would be impressed. Well, no. >>>> If Alan wishes to impress me, he should get Serapis to cause an >>>> earthquake in the Des Moines, Iowa metro area. Since we're not on a >>>> fault line, this would be very impressive. >>>> I'd issue another monetary challenge, but I don't know if he can >>>> handle being proved a failure again. >>>> >>> Nah, it looks Lord Serapis sent you rain, lots of it and lightning. >>> >>> http://whotv.com/2015/06/25/check-out-these-rainfall-reports-from-across-iowa/ >>> >>> Called down the thunder, did yeh? When your neighbors realize what >>> you've done you might want to think about moving or changing your name. >> >> Thunderstorms? In summer? Amazing! > > And NOT the earthquake I requested. > Rain was in the forecast well before I made my post. As such, my > challenge can't be connected. > When I said "you called down the thunder" it was on the 20th. Then on the 25th you got it in spades. That puts it 1 day out from the 5 day forecast as if I even pay attention to the weatherman in Des Moines. Saying "you called down the thunder" can be interpreted both literally and figuratively. On the 25th you got it literally, the figurative stuff is a little more subtle but is sure to find you. Like I said, you should have taken the blue pill. -- Abrahamic religions are Pharaonic co-option schemes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-27 04:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <81rsoattk3lpjmmub2t06ffq11kg6o8flo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #261003 |
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:29:57 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote:
>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 07:36:54 +1000, Government Shill #2
>> <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:26:47 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:30:43 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <or2ioa15ja5ts6gajb1fvehreup1oordbn@4ax.com>,
>>>>>> compuelf@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:07:50 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, you're one sick mutherfucker, but just for your info I'm celibate
>>>>>>>>>> unlike those hypocritical kiddie fucking priests.
>>>>>>>>> Are you claiming you don't masturbate? BWHAHAHAHAHAHA! Funny, but sad,
>>>>>>>>> too.
>>>>>>>> I guess that's an admission on your part that you do; me, I'm celibate.
>>>>>>> Even prostitutes want nothing to do with you. We got it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You got a lot of crawling to do before you can even begin to think of
>>>>>>>>>> being forgiven.
>>>>>>>>> I don't think he's worried about it any more than I am.
>>>>>>>> I hadn't included you in that but if you insist.
>>>>>>> Oh doom!
>>>>>>> Will Serapis once again prove how incompetent he is by causing an
>>>>>>> earthquake in an area unrelated to BDK?
>>>>>> If he got within 1000 miles I would be impressed. Well, no.
>>>>> If Alan wishes to impress me, he should get Serapis to cause an
>>>>> earthquake in the Des Moines, Iowa metro area. Since we're not on a
>>>>> fault line, this would be very impressive.
>>>>> I'd issue another monetary challenge, but I don't know if he can
>>>>> handle being proved a failure again.
>>>>>
>>>> Nah, it looks Lord Serapis sent you rain, lots of it and lightning.
>>>>
>>>> http://whotv.com/2015/06/25/check-out-these-rainfall-reports-from-across-iowa/
>>>>
>>>> Called down the thunder, did yeh? When your neighbors realize what
>>>> you've done you might want to think about moving or changing your name.
>>>
>>> Thunderstorms? In summer? Amazing!
>>
>> And NOT the earthquake I requested.
>> Rain was in the forecast well before I made my post. As such, my
>> challenge can't be connected.
>
>When I said "you called down the thunder" it was on the 20th.
If you're going to lie, and you are, lie about something not so
easy to PROVE a lie.
Subject: Re: A practical guide to countering science denial
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:26:47 -0700
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 55
Message-ID: <mmhrmp$7tp$1@speranza.aioe.org>
"Called down the thunder, did yeh?"
Note the date of the post. I've included the MID so that anyone
with an interest may verify.
>Then on the 25th you got it in spades.
There could be heard the sound of thunder. There is no way for me
to honestly deny this. However, it wasn't loud enough to cause any
concern.
And the rain we got at the house wasn't enough to cause any
worry. In fact, no one in the neighborhood has expressed any worry
about the amount of rain we got.
>That puts it 1 day out from the 5 day
>forecast as if I even pay attention to the weatherman in Des Moines.
>
My point wasn't that you do or do not pay attention to the Des
Moines area forecast. My point is that your god is only able to cause
weather patterns already predicted to occur.
If we accept that Serapis is real, you've again helped to prove
he is unworthy of any devotion of any sort.
>Saying "you called down the thunder" can be interpreted both literally
>and figuratively. On the 25th you got it literally, the figurative
>stuff is a little more subtle but is sure to find you.
>
And yet, it's not been able. Odd that.
>Like I said, you should have taken the blue pill.
At this point in my life, I have no need for Viagra. If I should
find myself experiencing erectile dysfunction, I certainly wouldn't
take medical advice on its treatment from a well documented liar and
k00k like you.
I suppose I should appreciate that you're so concerned about my
ability to engage in sexual activities, but it's very creepy that this
is an aspect of your life.
Or is this another case of you using projection? Since it is a
means of deception you use frequently, it's not unreasonable to
presume my guess that your celibacy is due to you being very
undesirable was wrong. You are unable to achieve an erection is more
plausible, given your projection.
--
"You're not supposed to be so blind with patriotism that you can't
face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it or who says it."
- Malcolm X
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-27 14:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mmn3mp$mns$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #261012 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:29:57 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 07:36:54 +1000, Government Shill #2
>>> <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:26:47 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:30:43 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <or2ioa15ja5ts6gajb1fvehreup1oordbn@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>> compuelf@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:07:50 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, you're one sick mutherfucker, but just for your info I'm celibate
>>>>>>>>>>> unlike those hypocritical kiddie fucking priests.
>>>>>>>>>> Are you claiming you don't masturbate? BWHAHAHAHAHAHA! Funny, but sad,
>>>>>>>>>> too.
>>>>>>>>> I guess that's an admission on your part that you do; me, I'm celibate.
>>>>>>>> Even prostitutes want nothing to do with you. We got it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You got a lot of crawling to do before you can even begin to think of
>>>>>>>>>>> being forgiven.
>>>>>>>>>> I don't think he's worried about it any more than I am.
>>>>>>>>> I hadn't included you in that but if you insist.
>>>>>>>> Oh doom!
>>>>>>>> Will Serapis once again prove how incompetent he is by causing an
>>>>>>>> earthquake in an area unrelated to BDK?
>>>>>>> If he got within 1000 miles I would be impressed. Well, no.
>>>>>> If Alan wishes to impress me, he should get Serapis to cause an
>>>>>> earthquake in the Des Moines, Iowa metro area. Since we're not on a
>>>>>> fault line, this would be very impressive.
>>>>>> I'd issue another monetary challenge, but I don't know if he can
>>>>>> handle being proved a failure again.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Nah, it looks Lord Serapis sent you rain, lots of it and lightning.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://whotv.com/2015/06/25/check-out-these-rainfall-reports-from-across-iowa/
>>>>>
>>>>> Called down the thunder, did yeh? When your neighbors realize what
>>>>> you've done you might want to think about moving or changing your name.
>>>> Thunderstorms? In summer? Amazing!
>>> And NOT the earthquake I requested.
>>> Rain was in the forecast well before I made my post. As such, my
>>> challenge can't be connected.
>> When I said "you called down the thunder" it was on the 20th.
>
> If you're going to lie, and you are, lie about something not so
> easy to PROVE a lie.
>
>
> Subject: Re: A practical guide to countering science denial
> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:26:47 -0700
> Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
> Lines: 55
> Message-ID: <mmhrmp$7tp$1@speranza.aioe.org>
>
>
> "Called down the thunder, did yeh?"
>
>
> Note the date of the post. I've included the MID so that anyone
> with an interest may verify.
>
You fucking moron, that's the second reference to "calling down the
thunder." The original mention was on 6/20 as anyone can readily check
on. This is a copy of what I said:
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:37:59 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
> <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> at that, take a hike!
>> Shan't. But you're certainly free to try and make me.
>> I've got $200.00 cash money that says you'll fail to make me.
>
> In case you think my offer isn't valid:
>
>
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/EOHOE001_zpsjpxun7yv.jpg
>
> As with all other aspects of your life, you will fail to make
> me "take a hike."
>
You called down the thunder you little Aspie prick. It ain't ever
going to stop until you crawl on your hands and knees to beg
forgiveness of me.
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us10002kld#general_summary
Now you are proved to be the liar and provocateur. Guess you should
have 'taken a hike' while you had the chance.
>> Then on the 25th you got it in spades.
>
> There could be heard the sound of thunder. There is no way for me
> to honestly deny this. However, it wasn't loud enough to cause any
> concern.
> And the rain we got at the house wasn't enough to cause any
> worry. In fact, no one in the neighborhood has expressed any worry
> about the amount of rain we got.
>
>> That puts it 1 day out from the 5 day
>> forecast as if I even pay attention to the weatherman in Des Moines.
>>
>
> My point wasn't that you do or do not pay attention to the Des
> Moines area forecast. My point is that your god is only able to cause
> weather patterns already predicted to occur.
> If we accept that Serapis is real, you've again helped to prove
> he is unworthy of any devotion of any sort.
Obviously proven wrong, you lying prick.
>
>> Saying "you called down the thunder" can be interpreted both literally
>> and figuratively. On the 25th you got it literally, the figurative
>> stuff is a little more subtle but is sure to find you.
>>
>
> And yet, it's not been able. Odd that.
>
>> Like I said, you should have taken the blue pill.
>
> At this point in my life, I have no need for Viagra. If I should
> find myself experiencing erectile dysfunction, I certainly wouldn't
> take medical advice on its treatment from a well documented liar and
> k00k like you.
> I suppose I should appreciate that you're so concerned about my
> ability to engage in sexual activities, but it's very creepy that this
> is an aspect of your life.
More provocation and dissembling non-sequiter dribble.
> Or is this another case of you using projection? Since it is a
> means of deception you use frequently, it's not unreasonable to
> presume my guess that your celibacy is due to you being very
> undesirable was wrong. You are unable to achieve an erection is more
> plausible, given your projection.
>
More disgusting trash from the prototypical everyday Aspie sadist.
--
Abrahamic religions are Pharaonic co-option schemes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-28 04:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vuevoa9iof0m5b2j6643c060k6t5840n7v@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #261036 |
On Sat, 27 Jun 2015 14:13:58 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote:
>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:29:57 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 07:36:54 +1000, Government Shill #2
>>>> <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:26:47 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:30:43 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <or2ioa15ja5ts6gajb1fvehreup1oordbn@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>> compuelf@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:07:50 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, you're one sick mutherfucker, but just for your info I'm celibate
>>>>>>>>>>>> unlike those hypocritical kiddie fucking priests.
>>>>>>>>>>> Are you claiming you don't masturbate? BWHAHAHAHAHAHA! Funny, but sad,
>>>>>>>>>>> too.
>>>>>>>>>> I guess that's an admission on your part that you do; me, I'm celibate.
>>>>>>>>> Even prostitutes want nothing to do with you. We got it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You got a lot of crawling to do before you can even begin to think of
>>>>>>>>>>>> being forgiven.
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think he's worried about it any more than I am.
>>>>>>>>>> I hadn't included you in that but if you insist.
>>>>>>>>> Oh doom!
>>>>>>>>> Will Serapis once again prove how incompetent he is by causing an
>>>>>>>>> earthquake in an area unrelated to BDK?
>>>>>>>> If he got within 1000 miles I would be impressed. Well, no.
>>>>>>> If Alan wishes to impress me, he should get Serapis to cause an
>>>>>>> earthquake in the Des Moines, Iowa metro area. Since we're not on a
>>>>>>> fault line, this would be very impressive.
>>>>>>> I'd issue another monetary challenge, but I don't know if he can
>>>>>>> handle being proved a failure again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nah, it looks Lord Serapis sent you rain, lots of it and lightning.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://whotv.com/2015/06/25/check-out-these-rainfall-reports-from-across-iowa/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Called down the thunder, did yeh? When your neighbors realize what
>>>>>> you've done you might want to think about moving or changing your name.
>>>>> Thunderstorms? In summer? Amazing!
>>>> And NOT the earthquake I requested.
>>>> Rain was in the forecast well before I made my post. As such, my
>>>> challenge can't be connected.
>>> When I said "you called down the thunder" it was on the 20th.
>>
>> If you're going to lie, and you are, lie about something not so
>> easy to PROVE a lie.
>>
>>
>> Subject: Re: A practical guide to countering science denial
>> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:26:47 -0700
>> Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
>> Lines: 55
>> Message-ID: <mmhrmp$7tp$1@speranza.aioe.org>
>>
>>
>> "Called down the thunder, did yeh?"
>>
>>
>> Note the date of the post. I've included the MID so that anyone
>> with an interest may verify.
>
>You fucking moron, that's the second reference to "calling down the
>thunder." The original mention was on 6/20 as anyone can readily check
>on. This is a copy of what I said:
>
> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:37:59 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
> > <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>> at that, take a hike!
> >> Shan't. But you're certainly free to try and make me.
> >> I've got $200.00 cash money that says you'll fail to make me.
> >
> > In case you think my offer isn't valid:
> >
> >
>http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/EOHOE001_zpsjpxun7yv.jpg
> >
> > As with all other aspects of your life, you will fail to make
> > me "take a hike."
> >
For anyone reading who isn't already aware, Alan (Eohoe) failed.
>
> You called down the thunder you little Aspie prick. It ain't ever
> going to stop until you crawl on your hands and knees to beg
> forgiveness of me.
>
>http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us10002kld#general_summary
>
>Now you are proved to be the liar and provocateur. Guess you should
>have 'taken a hike' while you had the chance.
>
You were clearly referring to yourself in that comment as PROVED
by your use of "you little Aspie prick." As such, my comment remains
100% true and accurate.
I know the truth and accuracy are things you HATE, but neither
will be changed simply because you don't like them.
Sucks to be you.
>>> Then on the 25th you got it in spades.
>>
>> There could be heard the sound of thunder. There is no way for me
>> to honestly deny this. However, it wasn't loud enough to cause any
>> concern.
>> And the rain we got at the house wasn't enough to cause any
>> worry. In fact, no one in the neighborhood has expressed any worry
>> about the amount of rain we got.
>>
>>> That puts it 1 day out from the 5 day
>>> forecast as if I even pay attention to the weatherman in Des Moines.
>>
>> My point wasn't that you do or do not pay attention to the Des
>> Moines area forecast. My point is that your god is only able to cause
>> weather patterns already predicted to occur.
>> If we accept that Serapis is real, you've again helped to prove
>> he is unworthy of any devotion of any sort.
>
>Obviously proven wrong, you lying prick.
>
You may deny the truth as often as you feel you must. The truth
will not change because you don't like it.
If Serapis is real, he's incompetent. He can only do as the
weather forecast predicts. I could claim any deity will cause X to
occur with the weather. In fact, I shall do so now.
Shiva will cause it to rain in the state of Oregon.
Note that, like you, I don't offer a date. This way when it does
rain, I can claim, like you, that the god I mentioned caused it.
See how easy that is?
Oh, I'm still waiting for that earthquake to hit the Des Moines,
Iowa area. If Serapis is as powerful as you claim, he should have no
trouble causing one.
>>> Saying "you called down the thunder" can be interpreted both literally
>>> and figuratively. On the 25th you got it literally, the figurative
>>> stuff is a little more subtle but is sure to find you.
>>
>> And yet, it's not been able. Odd that.
>>
>>> Like I said, you should have taken the blue pill.
>>
>> At this point in my life, I have no need for Viagra. If I should
>> find myself experiencing erectile dysfunction, I certainly wouldn't
>> take medical advice on its treatment from a well documented liar and
>> k00k like you.
>> I suppose I should appreciate that you're so concerned about my
>> ability to engage in sexual activities, but it's very creepy that this
>> is an aspect of your life.
>
>More provocation and dissembling non-sequiter dribble.
>
You're the one who suggested I take Viagra (the blue pill). Why
you're so interested in my sex life remains a mystery. And your
interest is still creepy.
>> Or is this another case of you using projection? Since it is a
>> means of deception you use frequently, it's not unreasonable to
>> presume my guess that your celibacy is due to you being very
>> undesirable was wrong. You are unable to achieve an erection is more
>> plausible, given your projection.
>
>More disgusting trash from the prototypical everyday Aspie sadist.
That you have Aspergers' is well know. But you're a sadist as
well? I suppose I should have realized that, since you were projecting
it onto BDK.
I do appreciate that you have admitted your posts are disgusting
trash. I would never have called them such as I find them far too
entertaining. But that you do is fine. I will, of course, point out
your admission regarding your posts from time to time.
Now do the bidding of Shiva and offer more avoidance of the
truth. You're free to pick the means of avoidance you use. And you
will use at least one (I'm hoping you'll run away from the truth and
refuse to acknowledge my post), proving that Shiva is far more
powerful than Serapis could ever dream of being.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-28 03:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mmojds$kb7$4@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #261056 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Sat, 27 Jun 2015 14:13:58 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:29:57 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 07:36:54 +1000, Government Shill #2 >>>>> <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:26:47 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:30:43 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In article <or2ioa15ja5ts6gajb1fvehreup1oordbn@4ax.com>, >>>>>>>>> compuelf@gmail.com says... >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:07:50 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, you're one sick mutherfucker, but just for your info I'm celibate >>>>>>>>>>>>> unlike those hypocritical kiddie fucking priests. >>>>>>>>>>>> Are you claiming you don't masturbate? BWHAHAHAHAHAHA! Funny, but sad, >>>>>>>>>>>> too. >>>>>>>>>>> I guess that's an admission on your part that you do; me, I'm celibate. >>>>>>>>>> Even prostitutes want nothing to do with you. We got it. >>>>>>>>>> <snip> > >>>> Saying "you called down the thunder" can be interpreted both literally >>>> and figuratively. On the 25th you got it literally, the figurative >>>> stuff is a little more subtle but is sure to find you. >>> And yet, it's not been able. Odd that. >>> >>>> Like I said, you should have taken the blue pill. >>> At this point in my life, I have no need for Viagra. If I should >>> find myself experiencing erectile dysfunction, I certainly wouldn't >>> take medical advice on its treatment from a well documented liar and >>> k00k like you. >>> I suppose I should appreciate that you're so concerned about my >>> ability to engage in sexual activities, but it's very creepy that this >>> is an aspect of your life. >> More provocation and dissembling non-sequiter dribble. >> > > You're the one who suggested I take Viagra (the blue pill). Why > you're so interested in my sex life remains a mystery. And your > interest is still creepy. > >>> Or is this another case of you using projection? Since it is a >>> means of deception you use frequently, it's not unreasonable to >>> presume my guess that your celibacy is due to you being very >>> undesirable was wrong. You are unable to achieve an erection is more >>> plausible, given your projection. >> More disgusting trash from the prototypical everyday Aspie sadist. > > That you have Aspergers' is well know. But you're a sadist as > well? I suppose I should have realized that, since you were projecting > it onto BDK. > I do appreciate that you have admitted your posts are disgusting > trash. I would never have called them such as I find them far too > entertaining. But that you do is fine. I will, of course, point out > your admission regarding your posts from time to time. > Now do the bidding of Shiva and offer more avoidance of the > truth. You're free to pick the means of avoidance you use. And you > will use at least one (I'm hoping you'll run away from the truth and > refuse to acknowledge my post), proving that Shiva is far more > powerful than Serapis could ever dream of being. > This is what happens when you take the red pill--you go psycho, and doubly so if you have aspergers syndrome. Seek out the help you need because you're not getting any better.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-28 11:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.2ff9db617e22cfcb98c155@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #261062 |
In article <mmojds$kb7$4@speranza.aioe.org>, eohoe@yahoo.com says... > > K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Jun 2015 14:13:58 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > >>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:29:57 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 07:36:54 +1000, Government Shill #2 > >>>>> <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:26:47 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:30:43 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> In article <or2ioa15ja5ts6gajb1fvehreup1oordbn@4ax.com>, > >>>>>>>>> compuelf@gmail.com says... > >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:07:50 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [...] > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, you're one sick mutherfucker, but just for your info I'm celibate > >>>>>>>>>>>>> unlike those hypocritical kiddie fucking priests. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Are you claiming you don't masturbate? BWHAHAHAHAHAHA! Funny, but sad, > >>>>>>>>>>>> too. > >>>>>>>>>>> I guess that's an admission on your part that you do; me, I'm celibate. > >>>>>>>>>> Even prostitutes want nothing to do with you. We got it. > >>>>>>>>>> > > > <snip> > > > > >>>> Saying "you called down the thunder" can be interpreted both literally > >>>> and figuratively. On the 25th you got it literally, the figurative > >>>> stuff is a little more subtle but is sure to find you. > >>> And yet, it's not been able. Odd that. > >>> > >>>> Like I said, you should have taken the blue pill. > >>> At this point in my life, I have no need for Viagra. If I should > >>> find myself experiencing erectile dysfunction, I certainly wouldn't > >>> take medical advice on its treatment from a well documented liar and > >>> k00k like you. > >>> I suppose I should appreciate that you're so concerned about my > >>> ability to engage in sexual activities, but it's very creepy that this > >>> is an aspect of your life. > >> More provocation and dissembling non-sequiter dribble. > >> > > > > You're the one who suggested I take Viagra (the blue pill). Why > > you're so interested in my sex life remains a mystery. And your > > interest is still creepy. > > > >>> Or is this another case of you using projection? Since it is a > >>> means of deception you use frequently, it's not unreasonable to > >>> presume my guess that your celibacy is due to you being very > >>> undesirable was wrong. You are unable to achieve an erection is more > >>> plausible, given your projection. > >> More disgusting trash from the prototypical everyday Aspie sadist. > > > > That you have Aspergers' is well know. But you're a sadist as > > well? I suppose I should have realized that, since you were projecting > > it onto BDK. > > I do appreciate that you have admitted your posts are disgusting > > trash. I would never have called them such as I find them far too > > entertaining. But that you do is fine. I will, of course, point out > > your admission regarding your posts from time to time. > > Now do the bidding of Shiva and offer more avoidance of the > > truth. You're free to pick the means of avoidance you use. And you > > will use at least one (I'm hoping you'll run away from the truth and > > refuse to acknowledge my post), proving that Shiva is far more > > powerful than Serapis could ever dream of being. > > > > This is what happens when you take the red pill--you go psycho, and > doubly so if you have aspergers syndrome. Seek out the help you need > because you're not getting any better. I've seen nothing from him to indicate any mental problems. I can't say the same thing about you, you practically scream, "I'm a whackjob!", in pretty much every post. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, and future Psychotronic World Dominator. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.conspiracy
csiph-web