Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #266747 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-08 11:30 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-13 05:41 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 199 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.conspiracy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 11:30 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 12:44 -0400
Re: Rocky has no clue about airplanes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 18:26 +0000
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 20:08 +0100
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 19:46 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:11 -0500
Re: Rocky is shooken jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 21:19 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 17:29 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-09 00:00 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 02:13 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-09 02:03 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 10:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-09 17:22 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 18:16 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:16 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-10 03:54 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-10 07:05 +0200
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:43 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 23:36 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit 3 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 10:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit 3 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-09 17:23 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-10 18:06 +1000
Re: Plane truth HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 07:39 -0400
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-10 20:58 +0100
Re: Plane truth george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> - 2015-09-11 08:14 +1200
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-10 16:57 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-10 23:03 +0100
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 19:51 +0100
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 15:45 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 16:20 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 16:54 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 17:21 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:53 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 23:09 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 09:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 16:15 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 13:35 -0400
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 18:31 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:28 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-10 04:21 +0000
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:41 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-10 08:59 -0400
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-10 13:52 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 12:31 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-19 18:37 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:03 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:10 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-20 05:21 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 10:56 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-20 19:52 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:22 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:29 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-21 01:42 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 22:11 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-21 05:06 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 06:14 -0500
Re: Plane truth dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-21 11:58 -0700
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 14:06 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-21 20:19 +0100
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 15:38 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:21 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-21 20:19 +0100
Re: Plane truth (Wow Michael found an interesting link ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:51 -0500
Re: Plane truth (Wow Michael found an interesting link ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:30 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 16:56 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:30 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 21:05 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( WTC Core Columns Turn To Dust? ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:40 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 09:52 +0100
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:10 -0500
Re: Plane truth BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-10 10:26 -0400
Re: Plane truth 9/11 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-11 09:34 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 19:34 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:54 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 12:09 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:41 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-13 07:29 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:05 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Kid is caught lying again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:32 -0500
Re: Plane truth (More proof, if any were needed, that Roger is mentally ill) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:47 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 15:55 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 17:03 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 17:36 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:56 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 12:29 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 09:05 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 12:32 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 15:09 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 18:53 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 13:09 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 17:57 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 17:57 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-12 16:45 -0700
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 19:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 20:35 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 07:55 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 11:14 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:48 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) ( Kid can not quote NIST ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:33 -0500
Re: Rocky's ignorance jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 19:52 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) ( Kid can not quote NIST ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:21 -0500
Re: Rocky babbles on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:32 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:26 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 09:35 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 18:22 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-15 02:17 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael stilll thinks he is super smart but he is a nobody ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 21:31 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-13 02:37 -0700
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:11 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:47 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-12 23:16 -0400
Re: Ignorance of aircraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:30 +0000
Re: Ignorance of aircraft BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-13 10:10 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:16 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:01 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-13 10:11 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:46 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:10 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Roger is not mentally able to answer questions) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:20 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 01:55 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:25 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 09:14 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-14 06:36 -0700
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:56 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-14 20:44 -0700
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-13 07:31 +0200
Re: delusions about airplanes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:26 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-15 13:52 -0700
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:16 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:20 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:33 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 05:57 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:01 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 15:56 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 15:02 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 21:35 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:35 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:32 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:23 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:31 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:39 -0500
Re: Rocky runs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 22:51 +0000
Re: Rocky runs Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 19:09 -0400
Re: Rocky runs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:48 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-13 16:27 -0700
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 18:54 -0500
Re: Imaginary missiles jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 00:29 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-14 06:35 -0700
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 09:06 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-14 17:07 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 12:25 -0500
Re: Rocky still delusional jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 17:58 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-14 22:05 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 17:40 -0500
Re: Rocky is really stupid jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 23:11 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:45 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-14 20:50 -0700
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 18:09 -0500
Re: Rocky still stupid jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 23:40 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:46 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-15 01:45 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 21:24 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 04:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 04:46 +0200
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-14 20:56 -0700
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 05:49 +0200
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-14 20:41 -0700
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-15 14:07 -0700
Re: Phantom missiles jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:35 +0000
Re: Phantom missiles "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-09-13 10:56 -0700
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:38 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:01 -0400
Re: Plane truth dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-15 13:44 -0700
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:06 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:41 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 20:02 -0400
Re: More Rocky fantasy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 21:13 +0000
Re: More Rocky fantasy Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
Re: More Rocky fantasy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 22:59 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:36 -0500
Re: Plane truth jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:12 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:56 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:03 -0400
Re: Plane delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:39 +0000
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Kid Wills proves he has never flown remote controlled airplanes + napalm ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Kid Wills proves he has never flown remote controlled airplanes + napalm ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:00 -0500
Re: more delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:41 +0000
Page 6 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 10 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 11:14 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) |
| Message-ID | <r66dnSuKp82NPGjInZ2dnUU7-WmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #267167 |
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:rhsava91m4mc05uc28s0qbflighilbd1df@4ax.com... > > I seem to recall NIST's explanation about the collapses doing a > fine job. NIST never even tried to address why the Twin Towers fell as fast as they did especially when so much of them were not damaged. And NIST never bothered to explain why a building with so much water could not put out that fire by itself. That is what the explosions in the basements of the Twin Towers did, they redirected that water supply elsewhere. BTW one of the first things I noticed was the media walked up to a woman who was by the Twin Towers when the explosions happened in the lower floors and they were trying to tell her what she saw but she made it clear she was talking about ground level and not 70 - 90 stories up in the air. Again, to see how evasive NIST has been see: NIST's Evasion http://911review.com/coverup/nist.html Or better yet search for NIST Collapse Creed with the following: https://www.google.com/search?q=nist+collapse+creed The fact remains NIST was very evasive in every step of the way including why they never considered the use of nukes or explosives on either of the Twin Towers or on WTC7. BTW I spoke to someone who uses a camera a lot with a high powered zoom and he knows that if a jet was easily visible in a narrow shot it should have been in the wide shot too. So there goes your bullshit about Chopper 5. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 13:48 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) |
| Message-ID | <m6hbvad6thjfqhp8cl6qdfsjddhlfta27n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #267208 |
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:14:25 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:rhsava91m4mc05uc28s0qbflighilbd1df@4ax.com...
>>
>> I seem to recall NIST's explanation about the collapses doing a
>> fine job.
>
>NIST never even tried to address why the Twin Towers fell as fast as they
>did especially when so much of them were not damaged.
>
They did. As dumbed down as I can make it:
The towers fell do to structural damage and weakening of the
supports.
If this is still to intellectual for you, there is nothing I can
do.
>And NIST never bothered to explain why a building with so much water could
>not put out that fire by itself.
The tanks on the top of each tower didn't contain enough water.
This has been explained to you several times.
>That is what the explosions in the
>basements of the Twin Towers did, they redirected that water supply
>elsewhere.
I am still waiting for your evidence of this fictional explosion.
>
>BTW one of the first things I noticed was the media walked up to a woman who
>was by the Twin Towers when the explosions happened in the lower floors and
>they were trying to tell her what she saw but she made it clear she was
>talking about ground level and not 70 - 90 stories up in the air.
Where can I, or anyone else with an interest, see this interview?
>
>Again, to see how evasive NIST has been see:
>
>NIST's Evasion
> http://911review.com/coverup/nist.html
>
>Or better yet search for NIST Collapse Creed with the following:
> https://www.google.com/search?q=nist+collapse+creed
>
Why don't you meet the burden you're under and provide the actual
evidence for your claims?
>The fact remains NIST was very evasive in every step of the way including
>why they never considered the use of nukes or explosives on either of the
>Twin Towers or on WTC7.
>
They weren't, of course. But your mind can't accept reality.
>BTW I spoke to someone who uses a camera a lot with a high powered zoom and
>he knows that if a jet was easily visible in a narrow shot it should have
>been in the wide shot too. So there goes your bullshit about Chopper 5.
><G>
I await your evidence for this claim. If you're lying, which you
are about to PROVE you are, you'll offer avoidance or nothing.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 14:33 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) ( Kid can not quote NIST ) |
| Message-ID | <sKidnTON8NAiUmjInZ2dnUU7-RudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #267234 |
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:m6hbvad6thjfqhp8cl6qdfsjddhlfta27n@4ax.com... > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:14:25 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >>news:rhsava91m4mc05uc28s0qbflighilbd1df@4ax.com... >>> >>> I seem to recall NIST's explanation about the collapses doing a >>> fine job. >> >>NIST never even tried to address why the Twin Towers fell as fast as they >>did especially when so much of them were not damaged. >> > > They did. As dumbed down as I can make it: I don't need dumbed down I need quotes asshole that way I now NIST said it instead of you. DUH. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 19:52 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky's ignorance |
| Message-ID | <0p0hcc-qfn.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #267253 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > I don't need dumbed down I need quotes asshole that way I now NIST said it > instead of you. You need EVERYTHING dumbed down as between your ignorance, stupidity, and delusions you have the mental acumen of a tree stump. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 04:21 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) ( Kid can not quote NIST ) |
| Message-ID | <hc4dvap72s2gkifavl5cg679cbvpacurve@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #267253 |
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 14:33:35 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:m6hbvad6thjfqhp8cl6qdfsjddhlfta27n@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:14:25 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:rhsava91m4mc05uc28s0qbflighilbd1df@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>> I seem to recall NIST's explanation about the collapses doing a
>>>> fine job.
>>>
>>>NIST never even tried to address why the Twin Towers fell as fast as they
>>>did especially when so much of them were not damaged.
>>
>> They did. As dumbed down as I can make it:
>>
>> The towers fell do to structural damage and weakening of the
>>supports.
>>
>> If this is still to intellectual for you, there is nothing I can
>>do.
>>
Rocky?
>>>And NIST never bothered to explain why a building with so much water could
>>>not put out that fire by itself.
>>
>> The tanks on the top of each tower didn't contain enough water.
>>This has been explained to you several times.
>>
Rocky?
>>>That is what the explosions in the
>>>basements of the Twin Towers did, they redirected that water supply
>>>elsewhere.
>>
>> I am still waiting for your evidence of this fictional explosion.
>>
>>>BTW one of the first things I noticed was the media walked up to a woman who
>>>was by the Twin Towers when the explosions happened in the lower floors and
>>>they were trying to tell her what she saw but she made it clear she was
>>>talking about ground level and not 70 - 90 stories up in the air.
>>
>> Where can I, or anyone else with an interest, see this interview?
Rocky?
>>>Again, to see how evasive NIST has been see:
>>>
>>>NIST's Evasion
>>> http://911review.com/coverup/nist.html
>>>
>>>Or better yet search for NIST Collapse Creed with the following:
>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=nist+collapse+creed
>>
>> Why don't you meet the burden you're under and provide the actual
>>evidence for your claims?
Rocky?
>>
>>>The fact remains NIST was very evasive in every step of the way including
>>>why they never considered the use of nukes or explosives on either of the
>>>Twin Towers or on WTC7.
>>>
>>
>> They weren't, of course. But your mind can't accept reality.
>>
Rocky?
>>>BTW I spoke to someone who uses a camera a lot with a high powered zoom and
>>>he knows that if a jet was easily visible in a narrow shot it should have
>>>been in the wide shot too. So there goes your bullshit about Chopper 5.
>>><G>
>>
>> I await your evidence for this claim. If you're lying, which you
>>are about to PROVE you are, you'll offer avoidance or nothing.
>
>I don't need dumbed down I need quotes asshole that way I now NIST said it
>instead of you. DUH.
So, this how you wish to admit you were lying? OK by me.
Your admission that you were lying when you claimed you spoke to
someone who uses a camera lot is noted and accepted.
Would you like to explain why you presented the lie? I'd like to
know the reason you presented it and what you thought you might gain
from such a lie.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 05:32 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky babbles on |
| Message-ID | <fcefcc-6pi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #267111 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:qdj9vattd4ri8s9c597c5l12plgfap02ot@4ax.com... >> Actually, FNVW and Jim have each offered very rational and >> plausible explanations. You did read and verify their explanations, >> right? Or did they use words that caused your head to hurt? > > They are both so full of bullshit I don't even bother to open any of their > post anymore. Yep, the words caused his delusional head to hurt. > Besides it isn't up to Jim and FN Nut to explain what NIST tried so very > hard to avoid. DUH. However it is up to you to explain how you became so batshit crazy. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 22:26 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) |
| Message-ID | <ejn9va1dq3n8kgq3vm6k73u2uhj1d0c5rt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #267096 |
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 19:27:29 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > ><edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:b6be6cd9-4d75-43e5-8064-6564a04b11ea@googlegroups.com... >> On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 6:58:24 PM UTC-4, Rocky wrote: >>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>> news:bu79va12pe89s58tvakmm3gioapnoodf29@4ax.com... >>> > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:09:28 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> >>> Which one of you kooks is claiming it was a missile? >>> > >>> >>Everyone. >>> >>...Except YOU, of course. >>> > >>> > Missile type and platform then? >>> >>> See the following video and start it at 25:25. >>> >>> Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] >>> ( indexed to start at 25:25 ) >>> https://youtu.be/Lec9giab90I?t=25m25s >>> >>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but the >>> type of missile used didn't have a problem. >>> >>> Rocky >> >> OK, we're supposed to believe Dimitri is a "nuclear expert." Now he's a >> missile expert and a aerodynamics expert as well? >> >> What exactly ARE Dimitri's qualifications to make these judgements? > >People love to talk and Dimitri obviously had talked to quite a few whistle >blowers who wanted to tell their side of the story. So your Russian friend isn't an expert on anything. >So you shouldn't be focused on Dimitri but who Dimitri spoke to instead. >DUH What weapons expert did Dimitri speak to? What missile and what platform do they say hit the Pentagon? >Rocky >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 09:35 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) |
| Message-ID | <mt3ccu$8eg$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #267096 |
On 13/09/2015 01:27, Rocky wrote: > <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:b6be6cd9-4d75-43e5-8064-6564a04b11ea@googlegroups.com... >> On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 6:58:24 PM UTC-4, Rocky wrote: >>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>> news:bu79va12pe89s58tvakmm3gioapnoodf29@4ax.com... >>>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:09:28 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Which one of you kooks is claiming it was a missile? >>>> >>>>> Everyone. >>>>> ...Except YOU, of course. >>>> >>>> Missile type and platform then? >>> >>> See the following video and start it at 25:25. >>> >>> Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] >>> ( indexed to start at 25:25 ) >>> https://youtu.be/Lec9giab90I?t=25m25s >>> >>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but the >>> type of missile used didn't have a problem. >>> >>> Rocky >> >> OK, we're supposed to believe Dimitri is a "nuclear expert." Now he's a >> missile expert and a aerodynamics expert as well? >> >> What exactly ARE Dimitri's qualifications to make these judgements? > > People love to talk and Dimitri obviously had talked to quite a few whistle > blowers who wanted to tell their side of the story. > > So you shouldn't be focused on Dimitri but who Dimitri spoke to instead. > DUH > > And do not forget, to this very date the only person that could explain why > the debris from the Twin Towers did not fall straight down killing the dozen > or so Survivors in the North Tower is Dimitri. <G> > > Your explanation for why those people survived is laughable especially since > you have no reason for the debris to fall somewhere else besides straight > down. > > Rocky > > Many have asked this question and you have never answered, so yet again :- What exactly ARE Dimitri's qualifications? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 18:22 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) |
| Message-ID | <idWdnRxSioJVy2rInZ2dnUU7-TudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #267145 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:mt3ccu$8eg$1@dont-email.me... > On 13/09/2015 01:27, Rocky wrote: >> <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:b6be6cd9-4d75-43e5-8064-6564a04b11ea@googlegroups.com... >>> On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 6:58:24 PM UTC-4, Rocky wrote: >>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>> news:bu79va12pe89s58tvakmm3gioapnoodf29@4ax.com... >>>>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:09:28 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Which one of you kooks is claiming it was a missile? >>>>> >>>>>> Everyone. >>>>>> ...Except YOU, of course. >>>>> >>>>> Missile type and platform then? >>>> >>>> See the following video and start it at 25:25. >>>> >>>> Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] >>>> ( indexed to start at 25:25 ) >>>> https://youtu.be/Lec9giab90I?t=25m25s >>>> >>>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but >>>> the >>>> type of missile used didn't have a problem. >>>> >>>> Rocky >>> >>> OK, we're supposed to believe Dimitri is a "nuclear expert." Now he's a >>> missile expert and a aerodynamics expert as well? >>> >>> What exactly ARE Dimitri's qualifications to make these judgements? >> >> People love to talk and Dimitri obviously had talked to quite a few >> whistle >> blowers who wanted to tell their side of the story. >> >> So you shouldn't be focused on Dimitri but who Dimitri spoke to instead. >> DUH >> >> And do not forget, to this very date the only person that could explain >> why >> the debris from the Twin Towers did not fall straight down killing the >> dozen >> or so Survivors in the North Tower is Dimitri. <G> >> >> Your explanation for why those people survived is laughable especially >> since >> you have no reason for the debris to fall somewhere else besides straight >> down. >> >> Rocky >> >> > > Many have asked this question and you have never answered, so yet again :- > > What exactly ARE Dimitri's qualifications? His knowledge of things nobody else came forward with. And that is very important in solving crime cases you clown. And do not forget Dimitri is not the only one that says underground nukes vaporized the Twin Towers because so does this guy: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/08/28/nuclear-911-revealed-theories-and-disinformation-the-misguided-and-the-inhuman/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 02:17 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) |
| Message-ID | <mt7v3a$o6f$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #267520 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> Many have asked this question and you have never answered, so yet again :- >> >> What exactly ARE Dimitri's qualifications? >His knowledge of things nobody else came forward with. So he has nothing whatsoever. Not even janitor for a community college. He can act a little, and look like an expert to the kooktard sheeple, watching him being "interviewed" as an "expert" on those 4 hr 47 minute Youtube videos. >And do not forget Dimitri is not the only one that says underground nukes >vaporized the Twin Towers because so does this guy: But is he stupid enough to respond "Nothing!" to the question: "What happens when it [the nuclear blast wave] hits the air?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 21:31 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( Michael stilll thinks he is super smart but he is a nobody ) |
| Message-ID | <j-GdnXmt68-uHmrInZ2dnUU7-L-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #267553 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mt7v3a$o6f$3@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>> Many have asked this question and you have never answered, so yet again >>> :- >>> >>> What exactly ARE Dimitri's qualifications? > >>His knowledge of things nobody else came forward with. > > So he has nothing whatsoever. Not even janitor for a community college. > He can act a little, and look like an expert to the kooktard sheeple, > watching him being "interviewed" as an "expert" on those 4 hr 47 minute > Youtube videos. I didn't say that. He shows what his credential are in the very first part of the video so all anybody has to do is start watching it to find out. DUH >>And do not forget Dimitri is not the only one that says underground nukes >>vaporized the Twin Towers because so does this guy: > > But is he stupid enough to respond "Nothing!" to the question: > "What happens when it [the nuclear blast wave] hits the air?" That info is in the link you removed from my post you idiot. You would learn a lot if you looked at it. And I can't forget to point out that all the hardware and software that the 9/11 hoaxsters had a their command screwed up when they tired to add a CGI to a video with a crane in it. Here, see for yourself: Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4 ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 ) https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s "9/11 was a big lie, and the media showed us a poorly made film." Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) |
| Message-ID | <mt8asu$jut$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #267520 |
On 15/09/2015 00:22, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:mt3ccu$8eg$1@dont-email.me... >> On 13/09/2015 01:27, Rocky wrote: >>> <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:b6be6cd9-4d75-43e5-8064-6564a04b11ea@googlegroups.com... >>>> On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 6:58:24 PM UTC-4, Rocky wrote: >>>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:bu79va12pe89s58tvakmm3gioapnoodf29@4ax.com... >>>>>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:09:28 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Which one of you kooks is claiming it was a missile? >>>>>> >>>>>>> Everyone. >>>>>>> ...Except YOU, of course. >>>>>> >>>>>> Missile type and platform then? >>>>> >>>>> See the following video and start it at 25:25. >>>>> >>>>> Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] >>>>> ( indexed to start at 25:25 ) >>>>> https://youtu.be/Lec9giab90I?t=25m25s >>>>> >>>>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but >>>>> the >>>>> type of missile used didn't have a problem. >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> OK, we're supposed to believe Dimitri is a "nuclear expert." Now he's a >>>> missile expert and a aerodynamics expert as well? >>>> >>>> What exactly ARE Dimitri's qualifications to make these judgements? >>> >>> People love to talk and Dimitri obviously had talked to quite a few >>> whistle >>> blowers who wanted to tell their side of the story. >>> >>> So you shouldn't be focused on Dimitri but who Dimitri spoke to instead. >>> DUH >>> >>> And do not forget, to this very date the only person that could explain >>> why >>> the debris from the Twin Towers did not fall straight down killing the >>> dozen >>> or so Survivors in the North Tower is Dimitri. <G> >>> >>> Your explanation for why those people survived is laughable especially >>> since >>> you have no reason for the debris to fall somewhere else besides straight >>> down. >>> >>> Rocky >>> >>> >> >> Many have asked this question and you have never answered, so yet again :- >> >> What exactly ARE Dimitri's qualifications? > > His knowledge of things nobody else came forward with. And that is very > important in solving crime cases you clown. > > And do not forget Dimitri is not the only one that says underground nukes > vaporized the Twin Towers because so does this guy: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/08/28/nuclear-911-revealed-theories-and-disinformation-the-misguided-and-the-inhuman/ > > So no qualifications then, glad we cleared that up. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | edrhodes@hotmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 02:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) |
| Message-ID | <57c1679d-b96a-4799-b3b7-5a06470cbcf3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #267096 |
On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 8:28:36 PM UTC-4, Rocky wrote: > <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:b6be6cd9-4d75-43e5-8064-6564a04b11ea@googlegroups.com... > > On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 6:58:24 PM UTC-4, Rocky wrote: > >> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message > >> news:bu79va12pe89s58tvakmm3gioapnoodf29@4ax.com... > >> > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:09:28 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> >>> Which one of you kooks is claiming it was a missile? > >> > > >> >>Everyone. > >> >>...Except YOU, of course. > >> > > >> > Missile type and platform then? > >> > >> See the following video and start it at 25:25. > >> > >> Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] > >> ( indexed to start at 25:25 ) > >> https://youtu.be/Lec9giab90I?t=25m25s > >> > >> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but the > >> type of missile used didn't have a problem. > >> > >> Rocky > > > > OK, we're supposed to believe Dimitri is a "nuclear expert." Now he's a > > missile expert and a aerodynamics expert as well? > > > > What exactly ARE Dimitri's qualifications to make these judgements? > > People love to talk and Dimitri obviously had talked to quite a few whistle > blowers who wanted to tell their side of the story. So Dimitri has NO credentials to back up what he claims happened? Thank you for clearing that up. > So you shouldn't be focused on Dimitri but who Dimitri spoke to instead. > DUH But we don't know who Dimitri spoke to, or if he spoke to ANYONE. For all we know, he sat there in front of his typewriter and made the whole plot up. > And do not forget, to this very date the only person that could explain why > the debris from the Twin Towers did not fall straight down killing the dozen > or so Survivors in the North Tower is Dimitri. <G> And do not forget, to this very date, you have NOT been able to provide any verifiable evidence that "deep underground nukes" can affect the surface without breaking through with a huge plume of dirt and debris flying upwards. Nor have you provided any evidence that "deep underground nukes" can have their EMPs blocked to the point that, instead of frying all the circutry and causing the helicopters to drop to the ground, they just cause some minor static. > > Your explanation for why those people survived is laughable especially since > you have no reason for the debris to fall somewhere else besides straight > down. > > Rocky Your explanation as to what "deep underground nukes" are capable of is laughable expecially since you have no reason for the nukes to behave the way you claim they did.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 00:11 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) |
| Message-ID | <uhrecc-dug.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #267083 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but the > type of missile used didn't have a problem. Is that because commercial jets are always floating above the ground delusional fuckwit? Or is it that commercial jets have some sort of ground repelent, delusional fuckwit? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 20:47 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) |
| Message-ID | <mt2gvj$6km$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #267093 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but >> the type of missile used didn't have a problem. > > Is that because commercial jets are always floating above the ground > delusional fuckwit? > > Or is it that commercial jets have some sort of ground repelent, > delusional fuckwit? Wait a second ???? Which side are you arguing for ? As you are making a darn good point supporting the 9/11 truth movement. Since you are correct that any large commercial passenger jet could never be controllable because of "ground effect", and would have crashed, scattering debis everywhere, long before it ever got near the pentagon.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 20:12 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) |
| Message-ID | <ecj9vatakdgaad972pg2ftqaqf7j48ifb4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #267098 |
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 20:47:31 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but
>>> the type of missile used didn't have a problem.
>>
>> Is that because commercial jets are always floating above the ground
>> delusional fuckwit?
>>
>> Or is it that commercial jets have some sort of ground repelent,
>> delusional fuckwit?
>
>
>
>
>
>Wait a second ????
>Which side are you arguing for ?
>
>As you are making a darn good point supporting the 9/11 truth movement.
Bwahahahahahaha!
You honestly got me to laugh at that.
>Since you are correct that any large commercial passenger jet could never be
>controllable because of "ground effect", and would have crashed, scattering
>debis everywhere, long before it ever got near the pentagon.
Nowhere does Jim offer such a claim.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 23:16 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.305eb48115c3fe498c298@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #267103 |
In article <ecj9vatakdgaad972pg2ftqaqf7j48ifb4@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 20:47:31 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > > >jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> > >>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but > >>> the type of missile used didn't have a problem. > >> > >> Is that because commercial jets are always floating above the ground > >> delusional fuckwit? > >> > >> Or is it that commercial jets have some sort of ground repelent, > >> delusional fuckwit? > > > > > > > > > > > >Wait a second ???? > >Which side are you arguing for ? > > > >As you are making a darn good point supporting the 9/11 truth movement. > > Bwahahahahahaha! > You honestly got me to laugh at that. Yeah, that was funny. And the best part is, she has no idea why it's so funny. > > >Since you are correct that any large commercial passenger jet could never be > >controllable because of "ground effect", and would have crashed, scattering > >debis everywhere, long before it ever got near the pentagon. > > Nowhere does Jim offer such a claim. Just goes to show how delusional she is. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 05:30 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Ignorance of aircraft |
| Message-ID | <f8efcc-6pi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #267132 |
In sci.physics BDK <Control@worldcontrol.com> wrote: > In article <ecj9vatakdgaad972pg2ftqaqf7j48ifb4@4ax.com>, > compuelf@gmail.com says... >> >> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 20:47:31 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >> >jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> >> >>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but >> >>> the type of missile used didn't have a problem. >> >> >> >> Is that because commercial jets are always floating above the ground >> >> delusional fuckwit? >> >> >> >> Or is it that commercial jets have some sort of ground repelent, >> >> delusional fuckwit? >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >Wait a second ???? >> >Which side are you arguing for ? >> > >> >As you are making a darn good point supporting the 9/11 truth movement. >> >> Bwahahahahahaha! >> You honestly got me to laugh at that. > > Yeah, that was funny. And the best part is, she has no idea why it's so > funny. > >> >> >Since you are correct that any large commercial passenger jet could never be >> >controllable because of "ground effect", and would have crashed, scattering >> >debis everywhere, long before it ever got near the pentagon. >> >> Nowhere does Jim offer such a claim. > > Just goes to show how delusional she is. Yet another ignorant fuckwit chimes in to display his boundless stupidity. Ground effect has no effect on aircraft controllablility, fuckwit, and most airplanes are in ground effect during takeoff and landing. The only thing that keeps airplanes from flying very close to the ground is the common sense of the pilot. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 10:10 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Ignorance of aircraft |
| Message-ID | <MPG.305f4de5588ad4e098c299@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #267142 |
In article <f8efcc-6pi.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > In sci.physics BDK <Control@worldcontrol.com> wrote: > > In article <ecj9vatakdgaad972pg2ftqaqf7j48ifb4@4ax.com>, > > compuelf@gmail.com says... > >> > >> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 20:47:31 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but > >> >>> the type of missile used didn't have a problem. > >> >> > >> >> Is that because commercial jets are always floating above the ground > >> >> delusional fuckwit? > >> >> > >> >> Or is it that commercial jets have some sort of ground repelent, > >> >> delusional fuckwit? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >Wait a second ???? > >> >Which side are you arguing for ? > >> > > >> >As you are making a darn good point supporting the 9/11 truth movement. > >> > >> Bwahahahahahaha! > >> You honestly got me to laugh at that. > > > > Yeah, that was funny. And the best part is, she has no idea why it's so > > funny. > > > >> > >> >Since you are correct that any large commercial passenger jet could never be > >> >controllable because of "ground effect", and would have crashed, scattering > >> >debis everywhere, long before it ever got near the pentagon. > >> > >> Nowhere does Jim offer such a claim. > > > > Just goes to show how delusional she is. > > Yet another ignorant fuckwit chimes in to display his boundless stupidity. Um, you know I was posting about Bast, right? As far as I know, Bast is a female. > > Ground effect has no effect on aircraft controllablility, fuckwit, > and most airplanes are in ground effect during takeoff and landing. Neither of us agree with Bast and her nonsense. > > The only thing that keeps airplanes from flying very close to the > ground is the common sense of the pilot. > The Troofers think it's magic. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 09:16 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) |
| Message-ID | <3YidnebQfsb0GGjInZ2dnUU7-YudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #267187 |
"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message news:MPG.305f4de5588ad4e098c299@news.giganews.com... > In article <f8efcc-6pi.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > says... >> Yet another ignorant fuckwit chimes in to display his boundless >> stupidity. > > Um, you know I was posting about Bast, right? As far as I know, Bast is > a female. Oh gee, something that BKD and I finally agree on. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.conspiracy
csiph-web