Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.conspiracy > #271237 > unrolled thread

3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud

Back to article view | Back to alt.conspiracy

Contents

  3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud  "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-22 08:17 -0600
    Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-23 05:20 +0100
    Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-22 20:25 -0800
      Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-23 04:36 -0600
        Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 05:15 -0600
        Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-05 23:47 -0800
          Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-06 00:21 -0800
          Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud PaxPerPoten <PPP@USA.org> - 2015-12-06 02:56 -0600
            Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-06 01:51 -0800
              Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 04:48 -0600
            Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-06 01:53 -0800
          Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 04:47 -0600
      Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 05:14 -0600
      Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-23 11:58 -0500
        Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-23 13:14 -0600
          Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-23 20:13 +0000
            Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-23 14:35 -0600
              Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-23 23:14 +0000
                Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-25 16:38 +0000
                  Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-25 09:56 -0800
                    Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 07:22 -0600
                      Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 12:26 -0500
                        Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-27 03:31 +0100
                          Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-04 07:53 -0800
                            Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-06 08:05 +0100
                              Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-06 00:03 -0800
                          Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-06 00:13 -0800
                            Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud naazim palan <naazimpalan@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 01:48 -0800
                              Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-06 01:51 -0800
                                Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 07:42 +1100
                                  Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 03:32 -0600
                                    Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 07:05 +1100
                                      Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 20:25 -0600
                            Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-06 02:12 -0800
                              Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-06 10:07 -0600
                            Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 07:40 +1100
                        Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 06:12 -0600
                    Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-27 01:59 +0000
                    Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-03 07:07 -0800
                  Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-05 23:55 -0800
                    Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 04:47 -0600
                Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-06 00:05 -0800

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#271369

On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:56:57 -0800, Shoe-Chucker 2
<georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:

>In article <n34o6r$ln$1@pcls7.std.com>,
> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:
>
>> Looks like I got the kooktards on the run.  Rocky doesn't post much now, 
>> and he doesn't reply to me any more.
>> 
>> Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!
>
>want the truth?

     Then ignore any claims made by a "Truther."
     Well, maybe not ignore. They are quite interesting. How they are
able to distort the actual truth while keeping a straight face is
fascinating.

>Google; 9/11 truth

     And laugh at the misinformation, disinformation and outright
lies.

>ask 2300+ architects and engineers why they don't buy the official story.

     Ask the 10s of thousands who do, since it's valid.

>follow the "yellow brick rd." to those that made lots of money on 9/11 
>lies.

     This will be good.
     Who are these people?

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#271373

On 11/26/2015 08:22 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:56:57 -0800, Shoe-Chucker 2
> <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <n34o6r$ln$1@pcls7.std.com>,
>> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:
>>
>>> Looks like I got the kooktards on the run.  Rocky doesn't post much now,
>>> and he doesn't reply to me any more.
>>>
>>> Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!
>>
>> want the truth?
>
>       Then ignore any claims made by a "Truther."
>       Well, maybe not ignore. They are quite interesting. How they are
> able to distort the actual truth while keeping a straight face is
> fascinating.

Never forget that only "official" stories are true. All other stories 
are lies and from kooks. You may snicker while listening to non-official 
stories no matter how well proven.


>> Google; 9/11 truth
>
>       And laugh at the misinformation, disinformation and outright
> lies.

Remember that governments and politicians NEVER LIE TO CITIZENS. That 
one fact allows you to ridicule and laugh at any story which does not 
toe the official line. Perhaps if you laugh at unofficial stories 
enough, people will get scared to repeat that misinformation, 
disinformation and outright lies.


>> ask 2300+ architects and engineers why they don't buy the official story.
>
>       Ask the 10s of thousands who do, since it's valid.

Always remember that truth is ALWAYS determined by a democratic vote. 
Just add up how many people believe the "official" stories and compare 
to the small number of "conspiracy theorists" and the matter is totally 
settled! The official story aways gets the most votes and that makes it 
true beyond any doubt!


>> follow the "yellow brick rd." to those that made lots of money on 9/11
>> lies.
>
>       This will be good.
>       Who are these people?

Yes, Get the names of non-believers, put them on an enemies list and 
destroy their lives. Big Brother loves you.



-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#271378

Am 26.11.2015 18:26, schrieb benj:

>>>> Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!
>>>
>>> want the truth?
>>
>> Then ignore any claims made by a "Truther."
>> Well, maybe not ignore. They are quite interesting. How they are
>> able to distort the actual truth while keeping a straight face is
>> fascinating.
>
> Never forget that only "official" stories are true. All other stories
> are lies and from kooks. You may snicker while listening to non-official
> stories no matter how well proven.
>
>
>>> Google; 9/11 truth
>>
>> And laugh at the misinformation, disinformation and outright
>> lies.
>
> Remember that governments and politicians NEVER LIE TO CITIZENS. That
> one fact allows you to ridicule and laugh at any story which does not
> toe the official line. Perhaps if you laugh at unofficial stories
> enough, people will get scared to repeat that misinformation,
> disinformation and outright lies.
>
>
>>> ask 2300+ architects and engineers why they don't buy the official
>>> story.
>>
>> Ask the 10s of thousands who do, since it's valid.
>
> Always remember that truth is ALWAYS determined by a democratic vote.
> Just add up how many people believe the "official" stories and compare
> to the small number of "conspiracy theorists" and the matter is totally
> settled! The official story aways gets the most votes and that makes it
> true beyond any doubt!

Crossposting does often occur and is often regarded as annoying. But it 
can be eventually useful, since you can talk to the 'neighbourhood', too.

Since you reply from 'sci.physics' and I from 'alt.conspiracy' you could 
have a look at this newsgroup, too. And I think, you would be a nice 
participant here (in alt.conspiracy),

And these guys that deal with 9-11 (and related questions) could use 
some advice from people trained in physics, since many 'conspiracies' 
are actually 'unusual physics in operation' (rather than conspiracy).

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#271737

In article <dbptk2Fgi9pU1@mid.individual.net>,
 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:

> Am 26.11.2015 18:26, schrieb benj:
> 
> >>>> Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!
> >>>
> >>> want the truth?
> >>
> >> Then ignore any claims made by a "Truther."
> >> Well, maybe not ignore. They are quite interesting. How they are
> >> able to distort the actual truth while keeping a straight face is
> >> fascinating.
> >
> > Never forget that only "official" stories are true. All other stories
> > are lies and from kooks. You may snicker while listening to non-official
> > stories no matter how well proven.
> >
> >
> >>> Google; 9/11 truth
> >>
> >> And laugh at the misinformation, disinformation and outright
> >> lies.
> >
> > Remember that governments and politicians NEVER LIE TO CITIZENS. That
> > one fact allows you to ridicule and laugh at any story which does not
> > toe the official line. Perhaps if you laugh at unofficial stories
> > enough, people will get scared to repeat that misinformation,
> > disinformation and outright lies.
> >
> >
> >>> ask 2300+ architects and engineers why they don't buy the official
> >>> story.
> >>
> >> Ask the 10s of thousands who do, since it's valid.
> >
> > Always remember that truth is ALWAYS determined by a democratic vote.
> > Just add up how many people believe the "official" stories and compare
> > to the small number of "conspiracy theorists" and the matter is totally
> > settled! The official story aways gets the most votes and that makes it
> > true beyond any doubt!
> 
> Crossposting does often occur and is often regarded as annoying. But it 
> can be eventually useful, since you can talk to the 'neighbourhood', too.
> 
> Since you reply from 'sci.physics' and I from 'alt.conspiracy' you could 
> have a look at this newsgroup, too. And I think, you would be a nice 
> participant here (in alt.conspiracy),
> 
> And these guys that deal with 9-11 (and related questions) could use 
> some advice from people trained in physics, since many 'conspiracies' 
> are actually 'unusual physics in operation' (rather than conspiracy).
> 
> TH

over 2300 architects and engineers have proven , the official story 
impossible.
visit;  www.ae911truth.org/
Today !
-- 
Karma ; what a concept!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#271768

Am 04.12.2015 16:53, schrieb Shoe-Chucker 2:

>> Crossposting does often occur and is often regarded as annoying. But it
>> can be eventually useful, since you can talk to the 'neighbourhood', too.
>>
>> Since you reply from 'sci.physics' and I from 'alt.conspiracy' you could
>> have a look at this newsgroup, too. And I think, you would be a nice
>> participant here (in alt.conspiracy),
>>
>> And these guys that deal with 9-11 (and related questions) could use
>> some advice from people trained in physics, since many 'conspiracies'
>> are actually 'unusual physics in operation' (rather than conspiracy).
>>
>> TH
>
> over 2300 architects and engineers have proven , the official story
> impossible.
> visit;  www.ae911truth.org/
> Today !

Well, maybe..

But they (apparently) don't use the UseNet.

So more people with education in physics and/or engineering are 
beneficial for this group.

I'm actually an engineer and regard physics as kind of hobby. So I can 
understand some of the more difficult aspects of this event.

And more such people would allow more progress. Hence invitation to 
physicists would be a good idea.

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#271772

On Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 2:05:34 AM UTC-5, Thomas Heger wrote:
> Am 04.12.2015 16:53, schrieb Shoe-Chucker 2:
> 
> >> Crossposting does often occur and is often regarded as annoying. But it
> >> can be eventually useful, since you can talk to the 'neighbourhood', too.
> >>
> >> Since you reply from 'sci.physics' and I from 'alt.conspiracy' you could
> >> have a look at this newsgroup, too. And I think, you would be a nice
> >> participant here (in alt.conspiracy),
> >>
> >> And these guys that deal with 9-11 (and related questions) could use
> >> some advice from people trained in physics, since many 'conspiracies'
> >> are actually 'unusual physics in operation' (rather than conspiracy).
> >>
> >> TH
> >
> > over 2300 architects and engineers have proven , the official story
> > impossible.
> > visit;  www.ae911truth.org/
> > Today !
> 
> Well, maybe..
> 
> But they (apparently) don't use the UseNet.
> 
> So more people with education in physics and/or engineering are 
> beneficial for this group.
> 
> I'm actually an engineer and regard physics as kind of hobby. So I can 
> understand some of the more difficult aspects of this event.
> 
> And more such people would allow more progress. Hence invitation to 
> physicists would be a good idea.
> 
> TH

the sound you heard during the colapse of building seven was not a squire wave but was nothing more the audio editing to cover up the many blast.They covered the video blast with checrbord splotches

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#271774

On Thursday, November 26, 2015 at 9:31:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas Heger wrote:
> Am 26.11.2015 18:26, schrieb benj:
> 
> >>>> Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!
> >>>
> >>> want the truth?
> >>
> >> Then ignore any claims made by a "Truther."
> >> Well, maybe not ignore. They are quite interesting. How they are
> >> able to distort the actual truth while keeping a straight face is
> >> fascinating.
> >
> > Never forget that only "official" stories are true. All other stories
> > are lies and from kooks. You may snicker while listening to non-official
> > stories no matter how well proven.
> >
> >
> >>> Google; 9/11 truth
> >>
> >> And laugh at the misinformation, disinformation and outright
> >> lies.
> >
> > Remember that governments and politicians NEVER LIE TO CITIZENS. That
> > one fact allows you to ridicule and laugh at any story which does not
> > toe the official line. Perhaps if you laugh at unofficial stories
> > enough, people will get scared to repeat that misinformation,
> > disinformation and outright lies.
> >
> >
> >>> ask 2300+ architects and engineers why they don't buy the official
> >>> story.
> >>
> >> Ask the 10s of thousands who do, since it's valid.
> >
> > Always remember that truth is ALWAYS determined by a democratic vote.
> > Just add up how many people believe the "official" stories and compare
> > to the small number of "conspiracy theorists" and the matter is totally
> > settled! The official story aways gets the most votes and that makes it
> > true beyond any doubt!
> 
> Crossposting does often occur and is often regarded as annoying. But it 
> can be eventually useful, since you can talk to the 'neighbourhood', too.
> 
> Since you reply from 'sci.physics' and I from 'alt.conspiracy' you could 
> have a look at this newsgroup, too. And I think, you would be a nice 
> participant here (in alt.conspiracy),
> 
> And these guys that deal with 9-11 (and related questions) could use 
> some advice from people trained in physics, since many 'conspiracies' 
> are actually 'unusual physics in operation' (rather than conspiracy).
> 
> TH

the sound you heard during the colapse of building seven was not a square wave but was nothing more the audio editing to cover up the many blast sounds.They covered the video blast with checkerbord splotches 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#271778

On Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 8:13:38 AM UTC, joeturn wrote:
> On Thursday, November 26, 2015 at 9:31:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas Heger wrote:
> > Am 26.11.2015 18:26, schrieb benj:
> > 
> > >>>> Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!
> > >>>
> > >>> want the truth?
> > >>
> > >> Then ignore any claims made by a "Truther."
> > >> Well, maybe not ignore. They are quite interesting. How they are
> > >> able to distort the actual truth while keeping a straight face is
> > >> fascinating.
> > >
> > > Never forget that only "official" stories are true. All other stories
> > > are lies and from kooks. You may snicker while listening to non-official
> > > stories no matter how well proven.
> > >
> > >
> > >>> Google; 9/11 truth
> > >>
> > >> And laugh at the misinformation, disinformation and outright
> > >> lies.
> > >
> > > Remember that governments and politicians NEVER LIE TO CITIZENS. That
> > > one fact allows you to ridicule and laugh at any story which does not
> > > toe the official line. Perhaps if you laugh at unofficial stories
> > > enough, people will get scared to repeat that misinformation,
> > > disinformation and outright lies.
> > >
> > >
> > >>> ask 2300+ architects and engineers why they don't buy the official
> > >>> story.
> > >>
> > >> Ask the 10s of thousands who do, since it's valid.
> > >
> > > Always remember that truth is ALWAYS determined by a democratic vote.
> > > Just add up how many people believe the "official" stories and compare
> > > to the small number of "conspiracy theorists" and the matter is totally
> > > settled! The official story aways gets the most votes and that makes it
> > > true beyond any doubt!
> > 
> > Crossposting does often occur and is often regarded as annoying. But it 
> > can be eventually useful, since you can talk to the 'neighbourhood', too.
> > 
> > Since you reply from 'sci.physics' and I from 'alt.conspiracy' you could 
> > have a look at this newsgroup, too. And I think, you would be a nice 
> > participant here (in alt.conspiracy),
> > 
> > And these guys that deal with 9-11 (and related questions) could use 
> > some advice from people trained in physics, since many 'conspiracies' 
> > are actually 'unusual physics in operation' (rather than conspiracy).
> > 
> > TH
> 
> the sound you heard during the colapse of building seven was not a square wave but was nothing more the audio editing to cover up the many blast sounds.They covered the video blast with checkerbord splotches


Evening squire, can I wave at you?


colapse
checkerbord

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#271780

On Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 4:48:43 AM UTC-5, naazim palan wrote:
> On Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 8:13:38 AM UTC, joeturn wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 26, 2015 at 9:31:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas Heger wrote:
> > > Am 26.11.2015 18:26, schrieb benj:
> > > 
> > > >>>> Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> want the truth?
> > > >>
> > > >> Then ignore any claims made by a "Truther."
> > > >> Well, maybe not ignore. They are quite interesting. How they are
> > > >> able to distort the actual truth while keeping a straight face is
> > > >> fascinating.
> > > >
> > > > Never forget that only "official" stories are true. All other stories
> > > > are lies and from kooks. You may snicker while listening to non-official
> > > > stories no matter how well proven.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>> Google; 9/11 truth
> > > >>
> > > >> And laugh at the misinformation, disinformation and outright
> > > >> lies.
> > > >
> > > > Remember that governments and politicians NEVER LIE TO CITIZENS. That
> > > > one fact allows you to ridicule and laugh at any story which does not
> > > > toe the official line. Perhaps if you laugh at unofficial stories
> > > > enough, people will get scared to repeat that misinformation,
> > > > disinformation and outright lies.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>> ask 2300+ architects and engineers why they don't buy the official
> > > >>> story.
> > > >>
> > > >> Ask the 10s of thousands who do, since it's valid.
> > > >
> > > > Always remember that truth is ALWAYS determined by a democratic vote.
> > > > Just add up how many people believe the "official" stories and compare
> > > > to the small number of "conspiracy theorists" and the matter is totally
> > > > settled! The official story aways gets the most votes and that makes it
> > > > true beyond any doubt!
> > > 
> > > Crossposting does often occur and is often regarded as annoying. But it 
> > > can be eventually useful, since you can talk to the 'neighbourhood', too.
> > > 
> > > Since you reply from 'sci.physics' and I from 'alt.conspiracy' you could 
> > > have a look at this newsgroup, too. And I think, you would be a nice 
> > > participant here (in alt.conspiracy),
> > > 
> > > And these guys that deal with 9-11 (and related questions) could use 
> > > some advice from people trained in physics, since many 'conspiracies' 
> > > are actually 'unusual physics in operation' (rather than conspiracy).
> > > 
> > > TH
> > 
> > the sound you heard during the colapse of building seven was not a square wave but was nothing more the audio editing to cover up the many blast sounds.They covered the video blast with checkerbord splotches
> 
> 
> Evening squire, can I wave at you?
> 
> 
> colapse
> checkerbord

your too slow Pablum I already correct it just for you

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#271796

On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 01:51:22 -0800 (PST), joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 4:48:43 AM UTC-5, naazim palan wrote:
>> On Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 8:13:38 AM UTC, joeturn wrote:
>> > On Thursday, November 26, 2015 at 9:31:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas Heger wrote:
>> > > Am 26.11.2015 18:26, schrieb benj:
>> > > 
>> > > >>>> Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> want the truth?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Then ignore any claims made by a "Truther."
>> > > >> Well, maybe not ignore. They are quite interesting. How they are
>> > > >> able to distort the actual truth while keeping a straight face is
>> > > >> fascinating.
>> > > >
>> > > > Never forget that only "official" stories are true. All other stories
>> > > > are lies and from kooks. You may snicker while listening to non-official
>> > > > stories no matter how well proven.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >>> Google; 9/11 truth
>> > > >>
>> > > >> And laugh at the misinformation, disinformation and outright
>> > > >> lies.
>> > > >
>> > > > Remember that governments and politicians NEVER LIE TO CITIZENS. That
>> > > > one fact allows you to ridicule and laugh at any story which does not
>> > > > toe the official line. Perhaps if you laugh at unofficial stories
>> > > > enough, people will get scared to repeat that misinformation,
>> > > > disinformation and outright lies.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >>> ask 2300+ architects and engineers why they don't buy the official
>> > > >>> story.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Ask the 10s of thousands who do, since it's valid.
>> > > >
>> > > > Always remember that truth is ALWAYS determined by a democratic vote.
>> > > > Just add up how many people believe the "official" stories and compare
>> > > > to the small number of "conspiracy theorists" and the matter is totally
>> > > > settled! The official story aways gets the most votes and that makes it
>> > > > true beyond any doubt!
>> > > 
>> > > Crossposting does often occur and is often regarded as annoying. But it 
>> > > can be eventually useful, since you can talk to the 'neighbourhood', too.
>> > > 
>> > > Since you reply from 'sci.physics' and I from 'alt.conspiracy' you could 
>> > > have a look at this newsgroup, too. And I think, you would be a nice 
>> > > participant here (in alt.conspiracy),
>> > > 
>> > > And these guys that deal with 9-11 (and related questions) could use 
>> > > some advice from people trained in physics, since many 'conspiracies' 
>> > > are actually 'unusual physics in operation' (rather than conspiracy).
>> > > 
>> > > TH
>> > 
>> > the sound you heard during the colapse of building seven was not a square wave but was nothing more the audio editing to cover up the many blast sounds.They covered the video blast with checkerbord splotches
>> 
>> 
>> Evening squire, can I wave at you?
>> 
>> 
>> colapse
>> checkerbord
>
>your too slow Pablum I already correct it just for you

you're

No. No you didn't. They are still there. That's what makes it funny.

Shill #2
--
Roses are red,
violets are blue,
one of us is a moron,
I think that it's you. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#271799

On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 07:42:05 +1100, Government Shill #2
<gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

>>> > the sound you heard during the colapse of building seven was not a square wave but was nothing more the audio editing to cover up the many blast sounds.They covered the video blast with checkerbord splotches
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Evening squire, can I wave at you?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> colapse
>>> checkerbord
>>
>>your too slow Pablum I already correct it just for you
>
>you're
>
>No. No you didn't. They are still there. That's what makes it funny.

     What is most sad is that web browsers come with a spell checker
by default. Joe either disabled it or has chosen to ignore the
squiggly red line that shows under spelling errors.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#271813

On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 03:32:58 -0600, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 07:42:05 +1100, Government Shill #2
><gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>>> > the sound you heard during the colapse of building seven was not a square wave but was nothing more the audio editing to cover up the many blast sounds.They covered the video blast with checkerbord splotches
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Evening squire, can I wave at you?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> colapse
>>>> checkerbord
>>>
>>>your too slow Pablum I already correct it just for you
>>
>>you're
>>
>>No. No you didn't. They are still there. That's what makes it funny.
>
>     What is most sad is that web browsers come with a spell checker
>by default. Joe either disabled it or has chosen to ignore the
>squiggly red line that shows under spelling errors.


He's 10. He thinks the red lines are pretty.

Shill #2
--
With stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain. 
 Friedrich von Schiller (1759 - 1805)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#271823

On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 07:05:48 +1100, Government Shill #2
<gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 03:32:58 -0600, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 07:42:05 +1100, Government Shill #2
>><gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>>>> > the sound you heard during the colapse of building seven was not a square wave but was nothing more the audio editing to cover up the many blast sounds.They covered the video blast with checkerbord splotches
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Evening squire, can I wave at you?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> colapse
>>>>> checkerbord
>>>>
>>>>your too slow Pablum I already correct it just for you
>>>
>>>you're
>>>
>>>No. No you didn't. They are still there. That's what makes it funny.
>>
>>     What is most sad is that web browsers come with a spell checker
>>by default. Joe either disabled it or has chosen to ignore the
>>squiggly red line that shows under spelling errors.
>
>
>He's 10. He thinks the red lines are pretty.

     His posts are consistent with a pre-pubescent mind, so his being
10 isn't impossible. If nothing else, we can be sure his intellect is
very low.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#271784

On Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 3:13:38 AM UTC-5, joeturn wrote:
> On Thursday, November 26, 2015 at 9:31:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas Heger wrote:
> > Am 26.11.2015 18:26, schrieb benj:
> > 
> > >>>> Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!
> > >>>
> > >>> want the truth?
> > >>
> > >> Then ignore any claims made by a "Truther."
> > >> Well, maybe not ignore. They are quite interesting. How they are
> > >> able to distort the actual truth while keeping a straight face is
> > >> fascinating.
> > >
> > > Never forget that only "official" stories are true. All other stories
> > > are lies and from kooks. You may snicker while listening to non-official
> > > stories no matter how well proven.
> > >
> > >
> > >>> Google; 9/11 truth
> > >>
> > >> And laugh at the misinformation, disinformation and outright
> > >> lies.
> > >
> > > Remember that governments and politicians NEVER LIE TO CITIZENS. That
> > > one fact allows you to ridicule and laugh at any story which does not
> > > toe the official line. Perhaps if you laugh at unofficial stories
> > > enough, people will get scared to repeat that misinformation,
> > > disinformation and outright lies.
> > >
> > >
> > >>> ask 2300+ architects and engineers why they don't buy the official
> > >>> story.
> > >>
> > >> Ask the 10s of thousands who do, since it's valid.
> > >
> > > Always remember that truth is ALWAYS determined by a democratic vote.
> > > Just add up how many people believe the "official" stories and compare
> > > to the small number of "conspiracy theorists" and the matter is totally
> > > settled! The official story aways gets the most votes and that makes it
> > > true beyond any doubt!
> > 
> > Crossposting does often occur and is often regarded as annoying. But it 
> > can be eventually useful, since you can talk to the 'neighbourhood', too.
> > 
> > Since you reply from 'sci.physics' and I from 'alt.conspiracy' you could 
> > have a look at this newsgroup, too. And I think, you would be a nice 
> > participant here (in alt.conspiracy),
> 
> And these guys that deal with 9-11 (and related questions) could use 
> some advice from people trained in physics, since many 'conspiracies' 
> are actually 'unusual physics in operation' (rather than conspiracy).
> 
> TH
> 
Thomas the sound you heard during the collapse of building seven was not a square wave but was nothing more than audio editing to cover up the many blast sounds.They covered the video blast with checkerboard splotches to make you think there was a glitch in the film

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#271792

"joeturn" <joeturn2@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:855de3f4-f64f-41b3-a9f4-0d4135303cb7@googlegroups.com...
On Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 3:13:38 AM UTC-5, joeturn wrote:
> On Thursday, November 26, 2015 at 9:31:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas Heger wrote:
> > Am 26.11.2015 18:26, schrieb benj:
> >
> > >>>> Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!
> > >>>
> > >>> want the truth?
> > >>
> > >> Then ignore any claims made by a "Truther."
> > >> Well, maybe not ignore. They are quite interesting. How they are
> > >> able to distort the actual truth while keeping a straight face is
> > >> fascinating.
> > >
> > > Never forget that only "official" stories are true. All other stories
> > > are lies and from kooks. You may snicker while listening to 
> > > non-official
> > > stories no matter how well proven.
> > >
> > >
> > >>> Google; 9/11 truth
> > >>
> > >> And laugh at the misinformation, disinformation and outright
> > >> lies.
> > >
> > > Remember that governments and politicians NEVER LIE TO CITIZENS. That
> > > one fact allows you to ridicule and laugh at any story which does not
> > > toe the official line. Perhaps if you laugh at unofficial stories
> > > enough, people will get scared to repeat that misinformation,
> > > disinformation and outright lies.
> > >
> > >
> > >>> ask 2300+ architects and engineers why they don't buy the official
> > >>> story.
> > >>
> > >> Ask the 10s of thousands who do, since it's valid.
> > >
> > > Always remember that truth is ALWAYS determined by a democratic vote.
> > > Just add up how many people believe the "official" stories and compare
> > > to the small number of "conspiracy theorists" and the matter is 
> > > totally
> > > settled! The official story aways gets the most votes and that makes 
> > > it
> > > true beyond any doubt!
> >
> > Crossposting does often occur and is often regarded as annoying. But it
> > can be eventually useful, since you can talk to the 'neighbourhood', 
> > too.
> >
> > Since you reply from 'sci.physics' and I from 'alt.conspiracy' you could
> > have a look at this newsgroup, too. And I think, you would be a nice
> > participant here (in alt.conspiracy),
>
> And these guys that deal with 9-11 (and related questions) could use
> some advice from people trained in physics, since many 'conspiracies'
> are actually 'unusual physics in operation' (rather than conspiracy).
>
> TH
>
Thomas the sound you heard during the collapse of building seven was not a 
square wave but was nothing more than audio editing to cover up the many 
blast sounds.They covered the video blast with checkerboard splotches to 
make you think there was a glitch in the film

===================

But not only was the sound edited so were some of the videos because one 
video had a counter that skipped and other videos have smoke clouds that 
suddenly jump.

Apparently there was one great big flash then WTC7 came down ( one person 
said he saw it) and if people saw that flash in videos they would ask too 
many questions.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#271795

On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 00:13:37 -0800 (PST), joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> wrote:

>the sound you heard during the colapse of building seven was not a square wave but was nothing more the audio editing to cover up the many blast sounds.They covered the video blast with checkerbord splotches 

I love that you corrected the spelling in this version of your post, but still
missed:

colapse
more the audio editing
checkerbord

Your third grade teacher will give you at least a C for going to the effort.

Shill #2
--
Resonant Frequency,Radio Frequency and Radiant Energy are all one in
the same,Tesla called it aether.
 slowjoe (joeturn2000@yahoo.com)
 alt.conspiracy 03Apr12

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#271390

On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:26:47 -0500, benj <none@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 11/26/2015 08:22 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:56:57 -0800, Shoe-Chucker 2
>> <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <n34o6r$ln$1@pcls7.std.com>,
>>> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looks like I got the kooktards on the run.  Rocky doesn't post much now,
>>>> and he doesn't reply to me any more.
>>>>
>>>> Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!
>>>
>>> want the truth?
>>
>>       Then ignore any claims made by a "Truther."
>>       Well, maybe not ignore. They are quite interesting. How they are
>> able to distort the actual truth while keeping a straight face is
>> fascinating.
>
>Never forget that only "official" stories are true. All other stories 
>are lies and from kooks. You may snicker while listening to non-official 
>stories no matter how well proven.
>

     By now you k00ks should have been able to provide something in
the way of valid, verifiable evidence. Yet none have.
     In the conspiracy newsgroup, a poster known as Rocky has actually
proved all 9/11 k00k vids are lies.

>>> Google; 9/11 truth
>>
>>       And laugh at the misinformation, disinformation and outright
>> lies.
>
>Remember that governments and politicians NEVER LIE TO CITIZENS. That 
>one fact allows you to ridicule and laugh at any story which does not 
>toe the official line. Perhaps if you laugh at unofficial stories 
>enough, people will get scared to repeat that misinformation, 
>disinformation and outright lies.
>

     It's funny how after 14 years, none of you k00ks have provided
any valid, verifiable evidence.

>>> ask 2300+ architects and engineers why they don't buy the official story.
>>
>>       Ask the 10s of thousands who do, since it's valid.
>
>Always remember that truth is ALWAYS determined by a democratic vote. 
>Just add up how many people believe the "official" stories and compare 
>to the small number of "conspiracy theorists" and the matter is totally 
>settled! The official story aways gets the most votes and that makes it 
>true beyond any doubt!
>

     Why have no k00ks been able to provide any valid, verifiable
evidence of their claims?

>>> follow the "yellow brick rd." to those that made lots of money on 9/11
>>> lies.
>>
>>       This will be good.
>>       Who are these people?
>
>Yes, Get the names of non-believers, put them on an enemies list and 
>destroy their lives. Big Brother loves you.

     You really need to learn how to read. Or are you claiming the
9/11 k00ks are making money of their lies?

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#271377

Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> writes:

>In article <n34o6r$ln$1@pcls7.std.com>,
> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:

>> Looks like I got the kooktards on the run.  Rocky doesn't post much now, 
>> and he doesn't reply to me any more.
>> 
>> Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!

>want the truth?
>Google; 9/11 truth

I did that already a long time ago.  That's how I figured out that 
all "truthers" are apparently insane.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#271699

In article <georgewk10-838AB7.09565725112015@news.toast.net>,
 Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:

> In article <n34o6r$ln$1@pcls7.std.com>,
>  moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:
> 
> > Looks like I got the kooktards on the run.  Rocky doesn't post much now, 
> > and he doesn't reply to me any more.
> > 
> > Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!
> 
> want the truth?
> Google; 9/11 truth
> ask 2300+ architects and engineers why they don't buy the official story.
> follow the "yellow brick rd." to those that made lots of money on 9/11 
> lies.

www.ae911truth.org/
is good.
-- 
Karma ; what a concept!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#271771

On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 11:38:56 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Looks like I got the kooktards on the run.  Rocky doesn't post much now, 
> and he doesn't reply to me any more.
> 
> Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!

Dear Michell Moron
I have not seen you disprove anything Rocky has said,I know he's wrong about the Nuclear Bomb BS but some idiots still believe in Jesus now that's Maraculus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.conspiracy

csiph-web