Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.conspiracy > #261369 > unrolled thread

NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind

Back to article view | Back to alt.conspiracy

Contents

  NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind William Gigantus <bigwilly@shtc.net> - 2015-07-03 22:20 -0400
    Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-05 08:30 +0200
      Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-05 08:15 -0500
        Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-05 16:26 +0100
          Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-05 10:45 -0500
        Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-05 18:53 +0200
          Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-05 14:56 -0500
            Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-06 05:32 +0200
              Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 04:04 -0500
            Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-08 03:15 +0200
              Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 04:19 -0500
          Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-06 11:12 -0400
            Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 15:16 -0500
            Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-06 22:26 +0200
              Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-06 20:01 -0400
                Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 03:46 -0500
                  Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-07 15:22 -0400
                    Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 20:27 -0500
                      Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 03:37 -0500
                        Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-11 09:38 +0200
                          Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-11 04:43 -0500
                            Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-11 09:23 -0500
                              Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-11 23:10 +0200
                                Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind uchrisbrown2@gmail.com - 2015-07-11 16:05 -0700
                                Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-12 04:11 -0500
                                  Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-12 10:28 -0400
                                    Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-12 14:40 -0500
                                      Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-13 11:37 -0400
                                        Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 16:37 -0500
                                          Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-16 07:27 +0200
                                            Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 04:05 -0500
                                              Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-17 03:03 +0200
                                                Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 03:54 -0500
                                              Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-17 08:48 +0200
                                                Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 03:55 -0500
                                  Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-14 08:48 +0200
                                    Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 04:23 -0500
                                      Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-16 07:13 +0200
                                        Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 04:04 -0500
                                          Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-17 03:13 +0200
                                            Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 03:54 -0500
                      Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 03:38 -0500
              Re: NATO and the CIA are the Two Greatest Enemies of Mankind "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 03:45 -0500

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#261584

On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 09:38:28 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
wrote:

>Am 09.07.2015 10:37, schrieb K Wills (Shill #3):
>...
>>>> I - for my side - have no idea, what 'quarterly 11-15-15-11 files' are
>>>> and what you are talking about.
>>>>
>>>> TH
>>>
>>> Hahahahahahahaa!
>>>
>>> Thomas is German guys. He doesn't get humour. Ve ahv vays off makin you be
>>> SERIUS! No Laffing. Laffing is VERBOTEN!
>>>
>>> That and the paranoia. As we found out last week, paranoics don't have a sense
>>> of humour.
>>
>>       It is sad that Thomas can't understand a lame joke. I haven't
>> seen any other indications of paranoia on his part, but I can't rule
>> it out.
>
>Well, I understand the joke. But in German language serial numbering of 
>letters would be a very silly idea, since this would require a certain 
>alphabet as accepted standard.
>
>German has these letters, too: ö ü ä ß.
>
>Now the 'ä' is 'Umlaut' to 'a'. So 'ä' is the second letter of the 
>alphabet (next to its base 'a').
>
>Or not?
>
>Hmmm...
>
>There is certainly a 'standard alphabet', since Germans have norms about 
>almost everything. But is the 'ä' the second letter - or what number has 
>it????
>
>Actually I don't know.
>
>So the Germans try to avoid numbering of letters, hence do not 
>understand related jokes.

     Whereas I wrote in English, how anything is done in the German
language is not relevant.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#261590

On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:32:36 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
wrote:

>Am 11.07.2015 11:43, schrieb K Wills (Shill #3):
>
>>>>>> I - for my side - have no idea, what 'quarterly 11-15-15-11 files' are
>>>>>> and what you are talking about.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TH
>>>>>
>>>>> Hahahahahahahaa!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thomas is German guys. He doesn't get humour. Ve ahv vays off makin you be
>>>>> SERIUS! No Laffing. Laffing is VERBOTEN!
>>>>>
>>>>> That and the paranoia. As we found out last week, paranoics don't have a sense
>>>>> of humour.
>
>..
>
>>>
>>> So the Germans try to avoid numbering of letters, hence do not
>>> understand related jokes.
>>
>>       Whereas I wrote in English, how anything is done in the German
>> language is not relevant.
>>
>
>Well, language is kind of 'relative'. You have English as a first 
>language and I as a second.
>

     My first language is Polish. My second Italian. English comes
further down the list. 
      I mentioned this to you the last time you made this claim.

>So, what number does the English language have: one or two?
>

A=1
B=2
C=3
D=4
E=5

     And so on until you reach Z=26.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#261594

Am 11.07.2015 16:23, schrieb K Wills (Shill #3):

>>
>>>>>>> I - for my side - have no idea, what 'quarterly 11-15-15-11 files' are
>>>>>>> and what you are talking about.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TH
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hahahahahahahaa!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thomas is German guys. He doesn't get humour. Ve ahv vays off makin you be
>>>>>> SERIUS! No Laffing. Laffing is VERBOTEN!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That and the paranoia. As we found out last week, paranoics don't have a sense
>>>>>> of humour.
>>
>> ..
>>
>>>>
>>>> So the Germans try to avoid numbering of letters, hence do not
>>>> understand related jokes.
>>>
>>>        Whereas I wrote in English, how anything is done in the German
>>> language is not relevant.
>>>
>>
>> Well, language is kind of 'relative'. You have English as a first
>> language and I as a second.
>>
>
>       My first language is Polish. My second Italian. English comes
> further down the list.
>        I mentioned this to you the last time you made this claim.

Ok, agreed, but I forgot.

>> So, what number does the English language have: one or two?
>>
>
> A=1
> B=2
> C=3
> D=4
> E=5
>
>       And so on until you reach Z=26.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsches_Alphabet
A=1
Ä=2
B=3
C=4

until you reach 30.

The large letters have in fact only 29 letters, since the 'ß' has no 
capital form (it exists only as small letter).

But there exist two other common ways of sorting the German alphabet:
- putting the special letters to the end
- decompose the special letters ('ä' becomes 'ae')

All of these possibilities have different numbers.

Germans usually circumvent this problem by trying to avoid numbering of 
letters.


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#261601

Both organizations need to work together

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#261615

On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 23:10:30 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
wrote:

>Am 11.07.2015 16:23, schrieb K Wills (Shill #3):
>
>>>
>>>>>>>> I - for my side - have no idea, what 'quarterly 11-15-15-11 files' are
>>>>>>>> and what you are talking about.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TH
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hahahahahahahaa!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thomas is German guys. He doesn't get humour. Ve ahv vays off makin you be
>>>>>>> SERIUS! No Laffing. Laffing is VERBOTEN!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That and the paranoia. As we found out last week, paranoics don't have a sense
>>>>>>> of humour.
>>>
>>> ..
>>>
>>>>> So the Germans try to avoid numbering of letters, hence do not
>>>>> understand related jokes.
>>>>
>>>>        Whereas I wrote in English, how anything is done in the German
>>>> language is not relevant.
>>>
>>> Well, language is kind of 'relative'. You have English as a first
>>> language and I as a second.
>>
>>       My first language is Polish. My second Italian. English comes
>> further down the list.
>>        I mentioned this to you the last time you made this claim.
>
>Ok, agreed, but I forgot.
>
>>> So, what number does the English language have: one or two?
>>>
>>
>> A=1
>> B=2
>> C=3
>> D=4
>> E=5
>>
>>       And so on until you reach Z=26.
>
>https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsches_Alphabet
>A=1
>Ä=2
>B=3
>C=4
>
>until you reach 30.
>
>The large letters have in fact only 29 letters, since the 'ß' has no 
>capital form (it exists only as small letter).
>
>But there exist two other common ways of sorting the German alphabet:
>- putting the special letters to the end
>- decompose the special letters ('ä' becomes 'ae')
>
>All of these possibilities have different numbers.
>

     Since we're writting in English, the German allphabet is not
relevant.

>Germans usually circumvent this problem by trying to avoid numbering of 
>letters.

     It is fortunate then that I post to this group in English.
     What, exactly, did I post that your diverting attention from? Did
my lame joke about 11-15-15-11 (kook) files hit a little too close to
home?

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#261623

In article <qob4qat2qbb1ejaaopj42svqj4po9bbtnn@4ax.com>, 
compuelf@gmail.com says...
> 
> On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 23:10:30 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
> wrote:
> 
> >Am 11.07.2015 16:23, schrieb K Wills (Shill #3):
> >
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> I - for my side - have no idea, what 'quarterly 11-15-15-11 files' are
> >>>>>>>> and what you are talking about.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> TH
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hahahahahahahaa!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thomas is German guys. He doesn't get humour. Ve ahv vays off makin you be
> >>>>>>> SERIUS! No Laffing. Laffing is VERBOTEN!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> That and the paranoia. As we found out last week, paranoics don't have a sense
> >>>>>>> of humour.
> >>>
> >>> ..
> >>>
> >>>>> So the Germans try to avoid numbering of letters, hence do not
> >>>>> understand related jokes.
> >>>>
> >>>>        Whereas I wrote in English, how anything is done in the German
> >>>> language is not relevant.
> >>>
> >>> Well, language is kind of 'relative'. You have English as a first
> >>> language and I as a second.
> >>
> >>       My first language is Polish. My second Italian. English comes
> >> further down the list.
> >>        I mentioned this to you the last time you made this claim.
> >
> >Ok, agreed, but I forgot.
> >
> >>> So, what number does the English language have: one or two?
> >>>
> >>
> >> A=1
> >> B=2
> >> C=3
> >> D=4
> >> E=5
> >>
> >>       And so on until you reach Z=26.
> >
> >https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsches_Alphabet
> >A=1
> >Ä=2
> >B=3
> >C=4
> >
> >until you reach 30.
> >
> >The large letters have in fact only 29 letters, since the 'ß' has no 
> >capital form (it exists only as small letter).
> >
> >But there exist two other common ways of sorting the German alphabet:
> >- putting the special letters to the end
> >- decompose the special letters ('ä' becomes 'ae')
> >
> >All of these possibilities have different numbers.
> >
> 
>      Since we're writting in English, the German allphabet is not
> relevant.
> 
> >Germans usually circumvent this problem by trying to avoid numbering of 
> >letters.
> 
>      It is fortunate then that I post to this group in English.
>      What, exactly, did I post that your diverting attention from? Did
> my lame joke about 11-15-15-11 (kook) files hit a little too close to
> home?

I bet Thomas has a nice thick file at the police station. In the section 
marked with the German word for (Pick all that apply):

kOOk
Crackpot
Lunatic
Mental Patient.

I would love to have a German speaking friend take a look at it. One of 
many files..

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, and future Psychotronic World Dominator. 
Master of Remote Viewing. Level 5 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#261625

On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 10:28:58 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:

[...]

>> >The large letters have in fact only 29 letters, since the 'ß' has no 
>> >capital form (it exists only as small letter).
>> >
>> >But there exist two other common ways of sorting the German alphabet:
>> >- putting the special letters to the end
>> >- decompose the special letters ('ä' becomes 'ae')
>> >
>> >All of these possibilities have different numbers.
>> >
>> 
>>      Since we're writting in English, the German allphabet is not
>> relevant.
>> 
>> >Germans usually circumvent this problem by trying to avoid numbering of 
>> >letters.
>> 
>>      It is fortunate then that I post to this group in English.
>>      What, exactly, did I post that your diverting attention from? Did
>> my lame joke about 11-15-15-11 (kook) files hit a little too close to
>> home?
>
>I bet Thomas has a nice thick file at the police station. In the section 
>marked with the German word for (Pick all that apply):
>
>kOOk
>Crackpot
>Lunatic
>Mental Patient.
>
>I would love to have a German speaking friend take a look at it. One of 
>many files..

     I wouldn't be at all surprised if such a file exists, but I doubt
anyone without the legal right to view it would be allowed. I don't
know the applicable laws in Germany, but I can't imagine such
information would be available for the general public to examine.
     But it would make for a facinating read.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#261632

In article <nhg5qatjeg4nnk88l19mmpjmi6gkqlr1ii@4ax.com>, 
compuelf@gmail.com says...
> 
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 10:28:58 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> >The large letters have in fact only 29 letters, since the 'ß' has no 
> >> >capital form (it exists only as small letter).
> >> >
> >> >But there exist two other common ways of sorting the German alphabet:
> >> >- putting the special letters to the end
> >> >- decompose the special letters ('ä' becomes 'ae')
> >> >
> >> >All of these possibilities have different numbers.
> >> >
> >> 
> >>      Since we're writting in English, the German allphabet is not
> >> relevant.
> >> 
> >> >Germans usually circumvent this problem by trying to avoid numbering of 
> >> >letters.
> >> 
> >>      It is fortunate then that I post to this group in English.
> >>      What, exactly, did I post that your diverting attention from? Did
> >> my lame joke about 11-15-15-11 (kook) files hit a little too close to
> >> home?
> >
> >I bet Thomas has a nice thick file at the police station. In the section 
> >marked with the German word for (Pick all that apply):
> >
> >kOOk
> >Crackpot
> >Lunatic
> >Mental Patient.
> >
> >I would love to have a German speaking friend take a look at it. One of 
> >many files..
> 
>      I wouldn't be at all surprised if such a file exists, but I doubt
> anyone without the legal right to view it would be allowed. I don't
> know the applicable laws in Germany, but I can't imagine such
> information would be available for the general public to examine.
>      But it would make for a facinating read.

I wonder if he has a "journal", those can be some great stuff to read. 
My friend's daughter kept one from age 11 to 18 or so, when she finally 
"cracked" at Ohio State. The early years are the usual stuff, but from 
the start of HS on, wow, it's pretty kOOktacular. She does the EOHOE 
thing of connecting totally random events to her claims of the 
government copying her brain and putting the defective (90%) copy back 
into her head, while the original goes under Denver airport into the 
deep freezer with all the other "special brains". See the plot of Star 
Trek: "Spock's Brain", with a nuclear war added on for the rest of it.

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, and future Psychotronic World Dominator. 
Master of Remote Viewing. Level 5 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#261640

On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:37:04 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:

>In article <nhg5qatjeg4nnk88l19mmpjmi6gkqlr1ii@4ax.com>, 
>compuelf@gmail.com says...
>> 
>> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 10:28:58 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> [...]
>> 
>> >> >The large letters have in fact only 29 letters, since the 'ß' has no 
>> >> >capital form (it exists only as small letter).
>> >> >
>> >> >But there exist two other common ways of sorting the German alphabet:
>> >> >- putting the special letters to the end
>> >> >- decompose the special letters ('ä' becomes 'ae')
>> >> >
>> >> >All of these possibilities have different numbers.
>> >> >
>> >> 
>> >>      Since we're writting in English, the German allphabet is not
>> >> relevant.
>> >> 
>> >> >Germans usually circumvent this problem by trying to avoid numbering of 
>> >> >letters.
>> >> 
>> >>      It is fortunate then that I post to this group in English.
>> >>      What, exactly, did I post that your diverting attention from? Did
>> >> my lame joke about 11-15-15-11 (kook) files hit a little too close to
>> >> home?
>> >
>> >I bet Thomas has a nice thick file at the police station. In the section 
>> >marked with the German word for (Pick all that apply):
>> >
>> >kOOk
>> >Crackpot
>> >Lunatic
>> >Mental Patient.
>> >
>> >I would love to have a German speaking friend take a look at it. One of 
>> >many files..
>> 
>>      I wouldn't be at all surprised if such a file exists, but I doubt
>> anyone without the legal right to view it would be allowed. I don't
>> know the applicable laws in Germany, but I can't imagine such
>> information would be available for the general public to examine.
>>      But it would make for a facinating read.
>
>I wonder if he has a "journal", those can be some great stuff to read. 
>My friend's daughter kept one from age 11 to 18 or so, when she finally 
>"cracked" at Ohio State. The early years are the usual stuff, but from 
>the start of HS on, wow, it's pretty kOOktacular. She does the EOHOE 
>thing of connecting totally random events to her claims of the 
>government copying her brain and putting the defective (90%) copy back 
>into her head, while the original goes under Denver airport into the 
>deep freezer with all the other "special brains". See the plot of Star 
>Trek: "Spock's Brain", with a nuclear war added on for the rest of it.

     There's a kook out there, Robert Desko, who has a three part rant
about The Secret Underground World Society. If you've not read it, I
receomend you do. It's clear Robert lacks a formal education, but if
you can plow through the typos, poor grammer, and such, it's very
interesting.

http://dev.null.org/psychoceramics/collection/secret-underground-world-society.1.html

http://dev.null.org/psychoceramics/collection/secret-underground-world-society.2.html

http://dev.null.org/psychoceramics/collection/secret-underground-world-society.3.html

     I downloaded all three parts many years ago in Word format. I
then printed them out and put them in a three ring binder. I would
read a bit before bed each night.
     Truely facinating reading.
     I did do a naughty though. I contacted him when I came home from
work to find my livingroom light was on. The most plausible
explination was that I left it on when I went to work in the morning
(it was winter and dark outside). I asked him if the "Underground
Society" was trying to "pop my brian" by turning it on when I was out.
     Well, of course they were. Since I had read his doc about them
and knew the truth, they were surly going to try and get me. As our
coversation progressed he became more and more conserned for my
safety. It was funny at the time.
     Oh wow! I just found a dramatic reading of part of his rant.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsTU3PMe3P0

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#261689

Am 13.07.2015 23:37, schrieb K Wills (Shill #3):
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:37:04 -0400, BDK<Control@Worldcontrol.com>
> wrote:
>
>> In article<nhg5qatjeg4nnk88l19mmpjmi6gkqlr1ii@4ax.com>,
>> compuelf@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 10:28:58 -0400, BDK<Control@Worldcontrol.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>> The large letters have in fact only 29 letters, since the 'ß' has no
>>>>>> capital form (it exists only as small letter).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But there exist two other common ways of sorting the German alphabet:
>>>>>> - putting the special letters to the end
>>>>>> - decompose the special letters ('ä' becomes 'ae')
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All of these possibilities have different numbers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>       Since we're writting in English, the German allphabet is not
>>>>> relevant.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Germans usually circumvent this problem by trying to avoid numbering of
>>>>>> letters.
>>>>>
>>>>>       It is fortunate then that I post to this group in English.
>>>>>       What, exactly, did I post that your diverting attention from? Did
>>>>> my lame joke about 11-15-15-11 (kook) files hit a little too close to
>>>>> home?
>>>>
>>>> I bet Thomas has a nice thick file at the police station. In the section
>>>> marked with the German word for (Pick all that apply):
>>>>
>>>> kOOk
>>>> Crackpot
>>>> Lunatic
>>>> Mental Patient.
>>>>
>>>> I would love to have a German speaking friend take a look at it. One of
>>>> many files..
>>>
>>>       I wouldn't be at all surprised if such a file exists, but I doubt
>>> anyone without the legal right to view it would be allowed. I don't
>>> know the applicable laws in Germany, but I can't imagine such
>>> information would be available for the general public to examine.
>>>       But it would make for a facinating read.
>>
>> I wonder if he has a "journal", those can be some great stuff to read.
>> My friend's daughter kept one from age 11 to 18 or so, when she finally
>> "cracked" at Ohio State. The early years are the usual stuff, but from
>> the start of HS on, wow, it's pretty kOOktacular. She does the EOHOE
>> thing of connecting totally random events to her claims of the
>> government copying her brain and putting the defective (90%) copy back
>> into her head, while the original goes under Denver airport into the
>> deep freezer with all the other "special brains". See the plot of Star
>> Trek: "Spock's Brain", with a nuclear war added on for the rest of it.
>
>       There's a kook out there, Robert Desko, who has a three part rant
> about The Secret Underground World Society. If you've not read it, I
> receomend you do. It's clear Robert lacks a formal education, but if
> you can plow through the typos, poor grammer, and such, it's very
> interesting.
>
> http://dev.null.org/psychoceramics/collection/secret-underground-world-society.1.html


The guy complains about a certain common observation:

people usually regard themselves as member of some sort of group and 
subsequently like to promote other members of that same group.

So e.g. males prefer males? (no, they don't !)

All employees of Wal-Mart (or of Burger King) are a well defined  set of 
people, but usually do not prefer others of that same group.

We have also groups of same age (all the people aged 36, for example) or 
all the Christians in the world.

But it's mainly nonsense to promote e.g. 36ers, since the world has 
features of a fractal. This means:  the society in general is a mixture 
of several groups with similarities, but of different size and intensity.

A single individual is usually the member of several distinct sets of 
people:
- he himself is a set of one
- the family he belongs to
- his set of friends
- his former school mates
- clubs he belongs to
- former colleges from university, army or social clubs
- former colleges from former employers
- people with the same believes
- people belonging to the same party

and several others...

Only: these groups are not identical, since the closest ties are to the 
own family, since this has the least number of members.

Very loose ties are among other groups, like former school mates or the 
set of people of the same age.

This is actually ok and no reason to complain.

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#261695

On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:27:02 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
wrote:

>Am 13.07.2015 23:37, schrieb K Wills (Shill #3):
>> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:37:04 -0400, BDK<Control@Worldcontrol.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In article<nhg5qatjeg4nnk88l19mmpjmi6gkqlr1ii@4ax.com>,
>>> compuelf@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 10:28:58 -0400, BDK<Control@Worldcontrol.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>>>> The large letters have in fact only 29 letters, since the 'ß' has no
>>>>>>> capital form (it exists only as small letter).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But there exist two other common ways of sorting the German alphabet:
>>>>>>> - putting the special letters to the end
>>>>>>> - decompose the special letters ('ä' becomes 'ae')
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All of these possibilities have different numbers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       Since we're writting in English, the German allphabet is not
>>>>>> relevant.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Germans usually circumvent this problem by trying to avoid numbering of
>>>>>>> letters.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       It is fortunate then that I post to this group in English.
>>>>>>       What, exactly, did I post that your diverting attention from? Did
>>>>>> my lame joke about 11-15-15-11 (kook) files hit a little too close to
>>>>>> home?
>>>>>
>>>>> I bet Thomas has a nice thick file at the police station. In the section
>>>>> marked with the German word for (Pick all that apply):
>>>>>
>>>>> kOOk
>>>>> Crackpot
>>>>> Lunatic
>>>>> Mental Patient.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would love to have a German speaking friend take a look at it. One of
>>>>> many files..
>>>>
>>>>       I wouldn't be at all surprised if such a file exists, but I doubt
>>>> anyone without the legal right to view it would be allowed. I don't
>>>> know the applicable laws in Germany, but I can't imagine such
>>>> information would be available for the general public to examine.
>>>>       But it would make for a facinating read.
>>>
>>> I wonder if he has a "journal", those can be some great stuff to read.
>>> My friend's daughter kept one from age 11 to 18 or so, when she finally
>>> "cracked" at Ohio State. The early years are the usual stuff, but from
>>> the start of HS on, wow, it's pretty kOOktacular. She does the EOHOE
>>> thing of connecting totally random events to her claims of the
>>> government copying her brain and putting the defective (90%) copy back
>>> into her head, while the original goes under Denver airport into the
>>> deep freezer with all the other "special brains". See the plot of Star
>>> Trek: "Spock's Brain", with a nuclear war added on for the rest of it.
>>
>>       There's a kook out there, Robert Desko, who has a three part rant
>> about The Secret Underground World Society. If you've not read it, I
>> receomend you do. It's clear Robert lacks a formal education, but if
>> you can plow through the typos, poor grammer, and such, it's very
>> interesting.
>>
>> http://dev.null.org/psychoceramics/collection/secret-underground-world-society.1.html
>
>
>The guy complains about a certain common observation:
>

     The guy is mentally ill.

>people usually regard themselves as member of some sort of group and 
>subsequently like to promote other members of that same group.
>
>So e.g. males prefer males? (no, they don't !)
>

     Some do.

>All employees of Wal-Mart (or of Burger King) are a well defined  set of 
>people, but usually do not prefer others of that same group.
>
>We have also groups of same age (all the people aged 36, for example) or 
>all the Christians in the world.
>

     Not all Christians are aged 36.

>But it's mainly nonsense to promote e.g. 36ers, since the world has 
>features of a fractal. This means:  the society in general is a mixture 
>of several groups with similarities, but of different size and intensity.
>
>A single individual is usually the member of several distinct sets of 
>people:
>- he himself is a set of one
>- the family he belongs to
>- his set of friends
>- his former school mates
>- clubs he belongs to
>- former colleges from university, army or social clubs
>- former colleges from former employers
>- people with the same believes
>- people belonging to the same party
>
>and several others...
>
>Only: these groups are not identical, since the closest ties are to the 
>own family, since this has the least number of members.
>
>Very loose ties are among other groups, like former school mates or the 
>set of people of the same age.
>
>This is actually ok and no reason to complain.

     This last part makes no sense.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#261724

Am 16.07.2015 11:05, schrieb K Wills (Shill #3):
..
>> people usually regard themselves as member of some sort of group and
>> subsequently like to promote other members of that same group.
>>
>> So e.g. males prefer males? (no, they don't !)
>>
>
>       Some do.


Yes, but some don't.
>> All employees of Wal-Mart (or of Burger King) are a well defined  set of
>> people, but usually do not prefer others of that same group.
>>
>> We have also groups of same age (all the people aged 36, for example) or
>> all the Christians in the world.
>>
>
>       Not all Christians are aged 36.


No, age and believe are different attributes. The different attributes 
are independent from each others.

E.g. a person of 36 years might be female or male, Christian or 
Buddhist, tall or small, stupid or smart. This we don't know, since 
these attributes are independent from each other.

>> But it's mainly nonsense to promote e.g. 36ers, since the world has
>> features of a fractal. This means:  the society in general is a mixture
>> of several groups with similarities, but of different size and intensity.
>>
>> A single individual is usually the member of several distinct sets of
>> people:
>> - he himself is a set of one
>> - the family he belongs to
>> - his set of friends
>> - his former school mates
>> - clubs he belongs to
>> - former colleges from university, army or social clubs
>> - former colleges from former employers
>> - people with the same believes
>> - people belonging to the same party
>>
>> and several others...
>>
>> Only: these groups are not identical, since the closest ties are to the
>> own family, since this has the least number of members.
>>
>> Very loose ties are among other groups, like former school mates or the
>> set of people of the same age.
>>
>> This is actually ok and no reason to complain.
>
>       This last part makes no sense.
>

I wrote, that a single person is member of several groups (set of people 
with a certain attribute).

He may eventually regard members of such a group more preferable than 
non-members. From this he could draw the conclusion, such a member would 
be better in a job, he had to offer (rather than a non-member).

But in fact these groups are distinct, since attributes are in most 
cases independent, hence being good in a certain job is one thing and 
being member of a certain group another thing.

Also important is the intensity of relations. This is inversely 
proportional to the size of a group: stronger bonds you have in a family 
and loose bonds to e.g. members of a large organisations you belong to.

This is a feature of fractals: you have somehow similar structures, but 
of different size and behaviour. So the society in general follows 
similar rules as fractals and we have an overlay of several groups of 
different size, to witch a person belongs simultaneously.


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#261732

On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 03:03:01 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
wrote:

>Am 16.07.2015 11:05, schrieb K Wills (Shill #3):
>..
>>> people usually regard themselves as member of some sort of group and
>>> subsequently like to promote other members of that same group.
>>>
>>> So e.g. males prefer males? (no, they don't !)
>>>
>>
>>       Some do.
>
>
>Yes, but some don't.

     Few males prefer males, when viewed within the context of all
males. But your claim is that they don't. Not some don't.

>>> All employees of Wal-Mart (or of Burger King) are a well defined  set of
>>> people, but usually do not prefer others of that same group.
>>>
>>> We have also groups of same age (all the people aged 36, for example) or
>>> all the Christians in the world.
>>
>>       Not all Christians are aged 36.
>
>
>No, age and believe are different attributes. The different attributes 
>are independent from each others.
>
>E.g. a person of 36 years might be female or male, Christian or 
>Buddhist, tall or small, stupid or smart. This we don't know, since 
>these attributes are independent from each other.
>

     Ah. I see your point now. You worded it very poorly.

>>> But it's mainly nonsense to promote e.g. 36ers, since the world has
>>> features of a fractal. This means:  the society in general is a mixture
>>> of several groups with similarities, but of different size and intensity.
>>>
>>> A single individual is usually the member of several distinct sets of
>>> people:
>>> - he himself is a set of one
>>> - the family he belongs to
>>> - his set of friends
>>> - his former school mates
>>> - clubs he belongs to
>>> - former colleges from university, army or social clubs
>>> - former colleges from former employers
>>> - people with the same believes
>>> - people belonging to the same party
>>>
>>> and several others...
>>>
>>> Only: these groups are not identical, since the closest ties are to the
>>> own family, since this has the least number of members.
>>>
>>> Very loose ties are among other groups, like former school mates or the
>>> set of people of the same age.
>>>
>>> This is actually ok and no reason to complain.
>>
>>       This last part makes no sense.
>>
>
>I wrote, that a single person is member of several groups (set of people 
>with a certain attribute).
>
>He may eventually regard members of such a group more preferable than 
>non-members. From this he could draw the conclusion, such a member would 
>be better in a job, he had to offer (rather than a non-member).
>
>But in fact these groups are distinct, since attributes are in most 
>cases independent, hence being good in a certain job is one thing and 
>being member of a certain group another thing.
>
>Also important is the intensity of relations. This is inversely 
>proportional to the size of a group: stronger bonds you have in a family 
>and loose bonds to e.g. members of a large organisations you belong to.
>
>This is a feature of fractals: you have somehow similar structures, but 
>of different size and behaviour. So the society in general follows 
>similar rules as fractals and we have an overlay of several groups of 
>different size, to witch a person belongs simultaneously.

     Fractals are irrelevant to the discussion we're having.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#261728

Am 16.07.2015 11:05, schrieb K Wills (Shill #3):

>>>>>> kOOk
>>>>>> Crackpot
>>>>>> Lunatic
>>>>>> Mental Patient.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would love to have a German speaking friend take a look at it. One of
>>>>>> many files..
>>>>>
>>>>>        I wouldn't be at all surprised if such a file exists, but I doubt
>>>>> anyone without the legal right to view it would be allowed. I don't
>>>>> know the applicable laws in Germany, but I can't imagine such
>>>>> information would be available for the general public to examine.
>>>>>        But it would make for a facinating read.
>>>>
>>>> I wonder if he has a "journal", those can be some great stuff to read.
>>>> My friend's daughter kept one from age 11 to 18 or so, when she finally
>>>> "cracked" at Ohio State. The early years are the usual stuff, but from
>>>> the start of HS on, wow, it's pretty kOOktacular. She does the EOHOE
>>>> thing of connecting totally random events to her claims of the
>>>> government copying her brain and putting the defective (90%) copy back
>>>> into her head, while the original goes under Denver airport into the
>>>> deep freezer with all the other "special brains". See the plot of Star
>>>> Trek: "Spock's Brain", with a nuclear war added on for the rest of it.
>>>
>>>        There's a kook out there, Robert Desko, who has a three part rant
>>> about The Secret Underground World Society. If you've not read it, I
>>> receomend you do. It's clear Robert lacks a formal education, but if
>>> you can plow through the typos, poor grammer, and such, it's very
>>> interesting.
>>>
>>> http://dev.null.org/psychoceramics/collection/secret-underground-world-society.1.html
>>
>>
>> The guy complains about a certain common observation:
>>
>
>       The guy is mentally ill.

Possibly, b ut that is not your concern.

how a certain person feels, that is in most cases irrelevant to a 
discussion about a political subject.

This was different in the Soviet Union, since the then ruling criminal 
scum had put opponents into mental hospitals.

This was a crime against humanity and those deeds shall be condemned.

But you certainly do not want to follow the trail of Soviet misbehaviour?


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#261734

On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:48:06 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
wrote:

>Am 16.07.2015 11:05, schrieb K Wills (Shill #3):
>
>>>>>>> kOOk
>>>>>>> Crackpot
>>>>>>> Lunatic
>>>>>>> Mental Patient.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would love to have a German speaking friend take a look at it. One of
>>>>>>> many files..
>>>>>>
>>>>>>        I wouldn't be at all surprised if such a file exists, but I doubt
>>>>>> anyone without the legal right to view it would be allowed. I don't
>>>>>> know the applicable laws in Germany, but I can't imagine such
>>>>>> information would be available for the general public to examine.
>>>>>>        But it would make for a facinating read.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder if he has a "journal", those can be some great stuff to read.
>>>>> My friend's daughter kept one from age 11 to 18 or so, when she finally
>>>>> "cracked" at Ohio State. The early years are the usual stuff, but from
>>>>> the start of HS on, wow, it's pretty kOOktacular. She does the EOHOE
>>>>> thing of connecting totally random events to her claims of the
>>>>> government copying her brain and putting the defective (90%) copy back
>>>>> into her head, while the original goes under Denver airport into the
>>>>> deep freezer with all the other "special brains". See the plot of Star
>>>>> Trek: "Spock's Brain", with a nuclear war added on for the rest of it.
>>>>
>>>>        There's a kook out there, Robert Desko, who has a three part rant
>>>> about The Secret Underground World Society. If you've not read it, I
>>>> receomend you do. It's clear Robert lacks a formal education, but if
>>>> you can plow through the typos, poor grammer, and such, it's very
>>>> interesting.
>>>>
>>>> http://dev.null.org/psychoceramics/collection/secret-underground-world-society.1.html
>>>
>>>
>>> The guy complains about a certain common observation:
>>
>>       The guy is mentally ill.
>
>Possibly, b ut that is not your concern.

     He is very open about his mental illness.

>
>how a certain person feels, that is in most cases irrelevant to a 
>discussion about a political subject.
>

     Robert Desko's rant isn't about politics.

>This was different in the Soviet Union, since the then ruling criminal 
>scum had put opponents into mental hospitals.
>
>This was a crime against humanity and those deeds shall be condemned.

     It was immoral, but not a crime against humanity.

>
>But you certainly do not want to follow the trail of Soviet misbehaviour?

     Are you asking or telling?

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#261646

Am 12.07.2015 11:11, schrieb K Wills (Shill #3):
..
>>>> So, what number does the English language have: one or two?
>>>>
>>>
>>> A=1
>>> B=2
>>> C=3
>>> D=4
>>> E=5
>>>
>>>        And so on until you reach Z=26.
>>
>> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsches_Alphabet
>> A=1
>> Ä=2
>> B=3
>> C=4
>>
>> until you reach 30.
>>
>> The large letters have in fact only 29 letters, since the 'ß' has no
>> capital form (it exists only as small letter).
>>
>> But there exist two other common ways of sorting the German alphabet:
>> - putting the special letters to the end
>> - decompose the special letters ('ä' becomes 'ae')
>>
>> All of these possibilities have different numbers.
>>
>
>       Since we're writting in English, the German allphabet is not
> relevant.
>
>> Germans usually circumvent this problem by trying to avoid numbering of
>> letters.
>
>       It is fortunate then that I post to this group in English.
>       What, exactly, did I post that your diverting attention from? Did
> my lame joke about 11-15-15-11 (kook) files hit a little too close to
> home?
>

No, I understood the joke after you told me about the numbering of letters.

I tried to explain, why I didn't understand it in the beginning: I'm 
German and Germans do not number letters.

The reason for not numbering letters is: there are several common ways 
to order the German alphabet, hence you cannot know, what letter is 
meant by a certain number.

In the English speaking world such a 'code' might be of common use, but 
Germans usually do not understand, since they have no practise.


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#261651

On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 08:48:28 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
wrote:

>Am 12.07.2015 11:11, schrieb K Wills (Shill #3):
>..
>>>>> So, what number does the English language have: one or two?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A=1
>>>> B=2
>>>> C=3
>>>> D=4
>>>> E=5
>>>>
>>>>        And so on until you reach Z=26.
>>>
>>> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsches_Alphabet
>>> A=1
>>> Ä=2
>>> B=3
>>> C=4
>>>
>>> until you reach 30.
>>>
>>> The large letters have in fact only 29 letters, since the 'ß' has no
>>> capital form (it exists only as small letter).
>>>
>>> But there exist two other common ways of sorting the German alphabet:
>>> - putting the special letters to the end
>>> - decompose the special letters ('ä' becomes 'ae')
>>>
>>> All of these possibilities have different numbers.
>>
>>       Since we're writting in English, the German allphabet is not
>> relevant.
>>
>>> Germans usually circumvent this problem by trying to avoid numbering of
>>> letters.
>>
>>       It is fortunate then that I post to this group in English.
>>       What, exactly, did I post that your diverting attention from? Did
>> my lame joke about 11-15-15-11 (kook) files hit a little too close to
>> home?
>>
>
>No, I understood the joke after you told me about the numbering of letters.
>
>I tried to explain, why I didn't understand it in the beginning: I'm 
>German and Germans do not number letters.
>
>The reason for not numbering letters is: there are several common ways 
>to order the German alphabet, hence you cannot know, what letter is 
>meant by a certain number.
>
>In the English speaking world such a 'code' might be of common use, but 
>Germans usually do not understand, since they have no practise.

     And? What, like exactly, does this have to do with your
consistent use of diversion to avoid the truth?

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#261688

Am 14.07.2015 11:23, schrieb K Wills (Shill #3):

>>>>>> So, what number does the English language have: one or two?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A=1
>>>>> B=2
>>>>> C=3
>>>>> D=4
>>>>> E=5
>>>>>
>>>>>         And so on until you reach Z=26.
>>>>
>>>> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsches_Alphabet
>>>> A=1
>>>> Ä=2
>>>> B=3
>>>> C=4
>>>>
>>>> until you reach 30.
>>>>
>>>> The large letters have in fact only 29 letters, since the 'ß' has no
>>>> capital form (it exists only as small letter).
>>>>
>>>> But there exist two other common ways of sorting the German alphabet:
>>>> - putting the special letters to the end
>>>> - decompose the special letters ('ä' becomes 'ae')
>>>>
>>>> All of these possibilities have different numbers.
>>>
>>>        Since we're writting in English, the German allphabet is not
>>> relevant.
>>>
>>>> Germans usually circumvent this problem by trying to avoid numbering of
>>>> letters.
>>>
>>>        It is fortunate then that I post to this group in English.
>>>        What, exactly, did I post that your diverting attention from? Did
>>> my lame joke about 11-15-15-11 (kook) files hit a little too close to
>>> home?
>>>
>>
>> No, I understood the joke after you told me about the numbering of letters.
>>
>> I tried to explain, why I didn't understand it in the beginning: I'm
>> German and Germans do not number letters.
>>
>> The reason for not numbering letters is: there are several common ways
>> to order the German alphabet, hence you cannot know, what letter is
>> meant by a certain number.
>>
>> In the English speaking world such a 'code' might be of common use, but
>> Germans usually do not understand, since they have no practise.
>
>       And? What, like exactly, does this have to do with your
> consistent use of diversion to avoid the truth?

Please try to make your question a little clearer, since I don't 
understand what you want.

In fact I tried to explain, why the Germans usually do not understand 
such 'codes' (numbered letters). That would have been a requirement to 
understand the (lame) yoke of "...11-15-15-11 (kook) files..".

After being told about those numbers I cold easily understand it. But 
usually I have problems with the number of a letter, since German has 
several common ways, to sort the alphabet.


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#261694

On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:13:00 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
wrote:

>Am 14.07.2015 11:23, schrieb K Wills (Shill #3):
>
>>>>>>> So, what number does the English language have: one or two?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A=1
>>>>>> B=2
>>>>>> C=3
>>>>>> D=4
>>>>>> E=5
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         And so on until you reach Z=26.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsches_Alphabet
>>>>> A=1
>>>>> Ä=2
>>>>> B=3
>>>>> C=4
>>>>>
>>>>> until you reach 30.
>>>>>
>>>>> The large letters have in fact only 29 letters, since the 'ß' has no
>>>>> capital form (it exists only as small letter).
>>>>>
>>>>> But there exist two other common ways of sorting the German alphabet:
>>>>> - putting the special letters to the end
>>>>> - decompose the special letters ('ä' becomes 'ae')
>>>>>
>>>>> All of these possibilities have different numbers.
>>>>
>>>>        Since we're writting in English, the German allphabet is not
>>>> relevant.
>>>>
>>>>> Germans usually circumvent this problem by trying to avoid numbering of
>>>>> letters.
>>>>
>>>>        It is fortunate then that I post to this group in English.
>>>>        What, exactly, did I post that your diverting attention from? Did
>>>> my lame joke about 11-15-15-11 (kook) files hit a little too close to
>>>> home?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, I understood the joke after you told me about the numbering of letters.
>>>
>>> I tried to explain, why I didn't understand it in the beginning: I'm
>>> German and Germans do not number letters.
>>>
>>> The reason for not numbering letters is: there are several common ways
>>> to order the German alphabet, hence you cannot know, what letter is
>>> meant by a certain number.
>>>
>>> In the English speaking world such a 'code' might be of common use, but
>>> Germans usually do not understand, since they have no practise.
>>
>>       And? What, like exactly, does this have to do with your
>> consistent use of diversion to avoid the truth?
>
>Please try to make your question a little clearer, since I don't 
>understand what you want.
>

     It's in regards to my comment to BDK about your use of diversion.

>In fact I tried to explain, why the Germans usually do not understand 
>such 'codes' (numbered letters). That would have been a requirement to 
>understand the (lame) yoke of "...11-15-15-11 (kook) files..".
>

     Your "explanation" has nothing to do with my comment.

>After being told about those numbers I cold easily understand it. But 
>usually I have problems with the number of a letter, since German has 
>several common ways, to sort the alphabet.

     Still not relevant.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#261725

Am 16.07.2015 11:04, schrieb K Wills (Shill #3):

>>>        And? What, like exactly, does this have to do with your
>>> consistent use of diversion to avoid the truth?
>>
>> Please try to make your question a little clearer, since I don't
>> understand what you want.
>>
>
>       It's in regards to my comment to BDK about your use of diversion.
>
>> In fact I tried to explain, why the Germans usually do not understand
>> such 'codes' (numbered letters). That would have been a requirement to
>> understand the (lame) yoke of "...11-15-15-11 (kook) files..".
>>
>
>       Your "explanation" has nothing to do with my comment.
>
>> After being told about those numbers I cold easily understand it. But
>> usually I have problems with the number of a letter, since German has
>> several common ways, to sort the alphabet.
>
>       Still not relevant.
>

If I write, I do not understand what you want, you could eventually 
repeat your question in a way that I could understand.

In your case I'm lost and cannot find to what you are referring to.

This is in fact easy in a longer discussion. So you may reformulate your 
question, without reference to something you have said earlier.

The other possibility is to write a reply to that earlier post, you have 
a question about.

Also possible is to quote the article again and ask the question in 
connection to that quote.

But what you cannot do is writing 'still not relevant', without telling 
me, what is not relevant about what.

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.conspiracy

csiph-web