Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #268662 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-29 09:53 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-10-04 19:10 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 352 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.conspiracy
The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-29 09:53 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 11:27 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 11:38 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 17:24 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 13:46 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 18:23 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 14:47 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 14:48 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-29 17:23 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 23:05 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 00:18 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 19:17 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 05:02 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 08:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:05 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 15:21 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 22:55 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 14:20 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 19:20 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 16:00 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 17:48 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:06 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-02 09:58 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 12:21 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 23:31 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:06 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-02 10:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:05 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 05:42 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 03:47 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-03 06:27 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:42 -0500
Re: Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-03 05:33 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 22:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 08:58 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-04 19:33 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 16:30 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 19:49 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 04:00 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 04:19 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 14:12 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 10:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 16:12 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 11:41 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 18:00 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 13:25 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-05 21:41 +0100
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 10:05 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 12:34 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 17:19 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 20:12 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 21:12 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 11:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-06 15:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 16:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 00:45 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 10:25 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 16:09 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 17:45 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-08 03:43 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-08 15:11 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-08 16:46 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 20:19 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-09 20:09 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 04:38 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-10 10:59 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-10 20:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-10 00:57 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-10-09 19:18 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-10 11:22 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-07 09:40 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 14:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 18:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 00:28 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 17:05 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-07 16:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 20:43 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 09:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 04:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-06 15:59 +0200
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 11:16 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 13:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 14:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-07 05:58 +0200
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 15:58 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 17:28 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 16:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 18:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 02:21 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-06 02:29 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 18:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 18:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-10-07 06:41 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-07 10:28 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 16:09 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 18:40 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 00:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-04 19:54 +0100
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 11:00 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-03 19:27 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-03 15:00 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-04 18:07 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 20:28 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 03:24 +0000
Re: Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-04 04:39 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 18:07 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 13:36 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 17:21 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:22 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 14:41 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 18:51 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 19:08 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 09:18 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 09:32 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 19:02 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 09:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 07:13 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 13:20 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-30 13:15 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 16:22 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 15:16 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 17:52 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 23:34 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 17:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 22:54 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 22:16 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-10-01 20:12 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 23:43 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 01:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 05:47 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 17:33 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 09:35 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 21:38 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-10-02 20:03 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 01:10 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-02 04:35 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 17:21 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 19:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 20:33 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 19:34 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 21:30 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 22:01 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 22:33 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 19:57 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 00:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 00:06 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 01:45 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 00:51 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 02:07 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 02:02 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:45 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 06:11 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 15:20 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 12:30 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:06 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 15:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 12:27 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 18:28 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:06 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW # 10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 15:16 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 12:26 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW and Checkmate #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 15:56 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 13:05 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 16:12 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 13:18 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW # 10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 16:21 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 16:22 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 13:30 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 16:18 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 16:45 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 17:02 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 17:24 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 18:05 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 19:02 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 19:09 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 19:18 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 20:36 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 21:06 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 21:43 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 00:52 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-30 23:09 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2015-09-30 23:24 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 02:05 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 02:11 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 02:08 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 15:14 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:06 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 21:41 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. buZZard DoW #7 <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-02 21:46 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. S¡r¡ Crews <siri.cruise@imf.gov> - 2015-10-02 19:53 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. buZZard DoW #7 <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-02 22:56 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 22:00 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 16:48 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 02:25 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 18:12 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 19:07 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 23:47 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 21:09 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 21:44 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 01:04 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 15:46 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 18:25 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:45 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-30 22:34 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 00:08 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-01 10:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-03 09:02 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:46 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:42 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:08 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:05 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 19:51 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 00:26 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 17:32 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 21:33 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 22:15 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 22:39 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 04:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 17:30 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 09:34 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 21:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 21:49 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 22:04 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:41 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-03 19:56 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 20:05 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 15:45 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 16:00 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 17:26 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-04 07:38 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-04 09:48 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-10-04 07:34 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-04 11:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-10-04 09:28 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 19:09 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-05 10:54 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:54 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-04 07:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:51 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 02:56 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 23:08 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-30 22:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 23:00 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-01 10:11 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 12:29 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-02 10:03 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 18:05 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:29 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 16:13 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 11:07 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 18:58 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 22:56 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-09 00:25 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-10-09 02:31 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-09 10:47 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:45 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:23 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 16:19 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 20:59 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 09:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:05 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 15:59 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 08:03 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 04:08 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 17:09 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 20:39 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 22:58 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-09 00:28 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 04:38 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-09 10:50 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 21:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-09 10:42 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 04:38 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 00:24 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 18:47 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 09:53 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 07:09 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 13:29 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 14:55 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 08:12 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 11:24 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 21:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 09:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 09:16 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:14 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:04 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 22:43 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 04:19 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 14:30 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:40 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 21:00 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 23:27 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 13:35 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 14:54 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-30 13:19 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 16:24 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 22:46 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:02 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 04:17 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:37 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 18:35 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 01:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-02 14:41 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-02 10:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-02 17:34 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-02 20:34 +0200
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-02 19:43 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 17:09 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:11 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:04 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:45 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:23 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 23:07 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 00:19 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 08:27 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-30 00:34 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:32 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 21:03 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 17:36 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 10:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:18 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:23 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 10:15 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-30 13:02 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-29 19:54 +0100
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2015-10-03 17:56 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 20:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2015-10-04 10:49 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 19:10 -0500
Page 13 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 … 18 Next page →
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-05 15:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <muujqi$1kp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #269058 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 19:56:28 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> >> >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 21:49:59 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Government Shill #2 wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:30:38 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 04:55:49 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> It is just coincidence that NASA also cost taxpayers >>>>>>> multi-billions of dollars,.....for a bag of rocks. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is that what you think is the extent of NASA's Space Program ? >>>>> >>>>> Neil Degrasse Tyson on the NASA budget: >>>>> https://youtu.be/l3BVjYFyF5M?t=22m24s >>>>> >>>>> Shill #2 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Ah-ha-ha,.....Neil Degrasse,.....the publicity whore NASA shill. >>>> >>>> All NASA had to do was buy a bag of meteorites from some guy in the >>>> desert, for $200. >>>> Or like Von Braun did, he just went to Antarctica and looked for them >>>> in the snow. >>>> >>>> All the space/moon rocks you need to sell a fairytale. >>> >>> I said you ARE one of the Troofers claiming the US never landed on the >>> moon. >>> >>> I'm always right and you're always wrong, Bast. >> >> >> You can think whatever you want, if it makes you get through the day. > > You don't really have that correct, Bast but I guess it's the best we > can expect from you. > >> I can actually deal with reality, and accept that the system is >> hopelessly corrupt. > > Reality to you is 180 out from everyone else. > >> Which is why I now work the system to my advantage, and let you pay >> for me getting ahead. > > But you're not getting ahead, Bast. You've quickly devolving into > insanity. > >> So I couldn't care less if you disagree with me or not. > > That's a good thing! > >> 9/11 was an inside job, and if you want me not to provide the proof to >> the world,.....pay me to stay quiet. > > So now you're begging for money. No, just presenting an offer. It's not like I'm greedy or anything. A few hundred million, and some 2 for 1 whopper coupons, would keep me quiet for decades.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-05 16:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <XK6dnUuIH7yOeI_LnZ2dnUU7-c-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #269165 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:muujqi$1kp$1@dont-email.me... > > > Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 19:56:28 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 21:49:59 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Government Shill #2 wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:30:38 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 04:55:49 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is just coincidence that NASA also cost taxpayers >>>>>>>> multi-billions of dollars,.....for a bag of rocks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is that what you think is the extent of NASA's Space Program ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Neil Degrasse Tyson on the NASA budget: >>>>>> https://youtu.be/l3BVjYFyF5M?t=22m24s >>>>>> >>>>>> Shill #2 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ah-ha-ha,.....Neil Degrasse,.....the publicity whore NASA shill. >>>>> >>>>> All NASA had to do was buy a bag of meteorites from some guy in the >>>>> desert, for $200. >>>>> Or like Von Braun did, he just went to Antarctica and looked for them >>>>> in the snow. >>>>> >>>>> All the space/moon rocks you need to sell a fairytale. >>>> >>>> I said you ARE one of the Troofers claiming the US never landed on the >>>> moon. >>>> >>>> I'm always right and you're always wrong, Bast. >>> >>> >>> You can think whatever you want, if it makes you get through the day. >> >> You don't really have that correct, Bast but I guess it's the best we >> can expect from you. >> >>> I can actually deal with reality, and accept that the system is >>> hopelessly corrupt. >> >> Reality to you is 180 out from everyone else. >> >>> Which is why I now work the system to my advantage, and let you pay >>> for me getting ahead. >> >> But you're not getting ahead, Bast. You've quickly devolving into >> insanity. >> >>> So I couldn't care less if you disagree with me or not. >> >> That's a good thing! >> >>> 9/11 was an inside job, and if you want me not to provide the proof to >>> the world,.....pay me to stay quiet. >> >> So now you're begging for money. > > > > > No, just presenting an offer. > It's not like I'm greedy or anything. A few hundred million, and some 2 > for 1 whopper coupons, would keep me quiet for decades. Talking about keeping quiet I wonder if all those people that received benefits from being first responders or injured in the Twin Towers that they don't get anymore still have to keep quiet. If they don't then the ones that didn't die of cancer can tell us about the pools of molten metal that happens to be in the same spots that the haze in the following photo comes from. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg It would be interesting to see if there are all the sudden all sorts of witnesses to the lack of jets in Nuke York City on 9/11/01. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-05 17:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8oq51b5ojmu123m6ila2e145horj75dh1o@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #269165 |
On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:45:04 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 19:56:28 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 21:49:59 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Government Shill #2 wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:30:38 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 04:55:49 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is just coincidence that NASA also cost taxpayers >>>>>>>> multi-billions of dollars,.....for a bag of rocks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is that what you think is the extent of NASA's Space Program ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Neil Degrasse Tyson on the NASA budget: >>>>>> https://youtu.be/l3BVjYFyF5M?t=22m24s >>>>>> >>>>>> Shill #2 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ah-ha-ha,.....Neil Degrasse,.....the publicity whore NASA shill. >>>>> >>>>> All NASA had to do was buy a bag of meteorites from some guy in the >>>>> desert, for $200. >>>>> Or like Von Braun did, he just went to Antarctica and looked for them >>>>> in the snow. >>>>> >>>>> All the space/moon rocks you need to sell a fairytale. >>>> >>>> I said you ARE one of the Troofers claiming the US never landed on the >>>> moon. >>>> >>>> I'm always right and you're always wrong, Bast. >>> >>> >>> You can think whatever you want, if it makes you get through the day. >> >> You don't really have that correct, Bast but I guess it's the best we >> can expect from you. >> >>> I can actually deal with reality, and accept that the system is >>> hopelessly corrupt. >> >> Reality to you is 180 out from everyone else. >> >>> Which is why I now work the system to my advantage, and let you pay >>> for me getting ahead. >> >> But you're not getting ahead, Bast. You've quickly devolving into >> insanity. >> >>> So I couldn't care less if you disagree with me or not. >> >> That's a good thing! >> >>> 9/11 was an inside job, and if you want me not to provide the proof to >>> the world,.....pay me to stay quiet. >> >> So now you're begging for money. > >No, just presenting an offer. >It's not like I'm greedy or anything. A few hundred million, and some 2 for >1 whopper coupons, would keep me quiet for decades. Why would anyone want to keep you quiet? You and Roger Rocky are one of the best tandem comedy acts on Usenet.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2u571blagi50rjerunes5648fvonh413lg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #269180 |
On Mon, 05 Oct 2015 17:26:45 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:
[...]
>>>> 9/11 was an inside job, and if you want me not to provide the proof to
>>>> the world,.....pay me to stay quiet.
>>>
>>> So now you're begging for money.
>>
>>No, just presenting an offer.
>>It's not like I'm greedy or anything. A few hundred million, and some 2 for
>>1 whopper coupons, would keep me quiet for decades.
>
>Why would anyone want to keep you quiet? You and Roger Rocky are one
>of the best tandem comedy acts on Usenet.
And the best evidence that the Troofers are completely wrong.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <it571bte14m1n411ptfi5sf800qtlpqskn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #269165 |
On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:45:04 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
[...]
>>> 9/11 was an inside job, and if you want me not to provide the proof to
>>> the world,.....pay me to stay quiet.
>>
>> So now you're begging for money.
>
>
>
>
>No, just presenting an offer.
>It's not like I'm greedy or anything. A few hundred million, and some 2 for
>1 whopper coupons, would keep me quiet for decades.
As if anyone would want to keep you quiet. You, and Roger, are
among the best examples of why the Troofer religion is 100% bunk.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-04 07:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mur30c$b3b$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #268977 |
Government Shill #2 wrote: > On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:30:38 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> > wrote: > >> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 04:55:49 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> It is just coincidence that NASA also cost taxpayers multi-billions of >>> dollars,.....for a bag of rocks. >> >> Is that what you think is the extent of NASA's Space Program ? > > Neil Degrasse Tyson on the NASA budget: > https://youtu.be/l3BVjYFyF5M?t=22m24s > Who else could have come up with $10,000. hammers, and multi-million toilets that don't work. Now tell me why NASA is under the direct control of the pentagon,.....who we KNOW can't be trusted.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-04 09:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.307af83f155546de98c30a@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #269046 |
In article <mur30c$b3b$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > Government Shill #2 wrote: > > On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:30:38 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> > > wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 04:55:49 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> It is just coincidence that NASA also cost taxpayers multi-billions of > >>> dollars,.....for a bag of rocks. > >> > >> Is that what you think is the extent of NASA's Space Program ? > > > > Neil Degrasse Tyson on the NASA budget: > > https://youtu.be/l3BVjYFyF5M?t=22m24s > > > > > > > > Who else could have come up with $10,000. hammers, and multi-million toilets > that don't work. Do you REALLY believe the $10000 for a hammer actually went for a hammer? $1000 for a screwdriver? Really? > > Now tell me why NASA is under the direct control of the pentagon,.....who we > KNOW can't be trusted. Why not? Please tell me all about it? -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-04 07:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-DFA65A.07345804102015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #269050 |
In article <MPG.307af83f155546de98c30a@news.giganews.com>, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote: > Do you REALLY believe the $10000 for a hammer actually went for a > hammer? $1000 for a screwdriver? Really? So....next July.....alien invasion? -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-04 11:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.307b0d5a2837951c98c30b@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #269052 |
In article <charlie-gordon1492-DFA65A.07345804102015@88-209-239- 213.giganet.hu>, charlie-gordon1492@no.where says... > > In article <MPG.307af83f155546de98c30a@news.giganews.com>, > BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote: > > > Do you REALLY believe the $10000 for a hammer actually went for a > > hammer? $1000 for a screwdriver? Really? > > So....next July.....alien invasion? Yeah! And we'll blow them up, too! -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-04 09:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-784467.09283804102015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #269054 |
In article <MPG.307b0d5a2837951c98c30b@news.giganews.com>, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote: > In article <charlie-gordon1492-DFA65A.07345804102015@88-209-239- > 213.giganet.hu>, charlie-gordon1492@no.where says... > > > > In article <MPG.307af83f155546de98c30a@news.giganews.com>, > > BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote: > > > > > Do you REALLY believe the $10000 for a hammer actually went for a > > > hammer? $1000 for a screwdriver? Really? > > > > So....next July.....alien invasion? > > Yeah! And we'll blow them up, too! They done blown up real good. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-04 19:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qtf31bt9iuua0t0gt2ib1qpqiu5qvrk9mt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #269050 |
On Sun, 4 Oct 2015 09:48:38 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:
>In article <mur30c$b3b$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
>>
>> Government Shill #2 wrote:
>> > On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:30:38 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 04:55:49 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> It is just coincidence that NASA also cost taxpayers multi-billions of
>> >>> dollars,.....for a bag of rocks.
>> >>
>> >> Is that what you think is the extent of NASA's Space Program ?
>> >
>> > Neil Degrasse Tyson on the NASA budget:
>> > https://youtu.be/l3BVjYFyF5M?t=22m24s
>>
>>
>> Who else could have come up with $10,000. hammers, and multi-million toilets
>> that don't work.
>
>Do you REALLY believe the $10000 for a hammer actually went for a
>hammer? $1000 for a screwdriver? Really?
>
In the film, "Independence Day," Judd Hirsch had a great line.
Well, he had a few, but one applies here. His character, Julius, is
speaking with the President.
President Thomas Whitmore: I don't understand, where does all this
come from? How do you get funding for something like this?
Julius Levinson: You don't actually think they spend $20,000 on a
hammer, $30,000 on a toilet seat, do you?
>> Now tell me why NASA is under the direct control of the pentagon,.....who we
>> KNOW can't be trusted.
>
>Why not? Please tell me all about it?
I would enjoy reading it too.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-05 10:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.307c5941cc729f4c98c30e@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #269091 |
In article <qtf31bt9iuua0t0gt2ib1qpqiu5qvrk9mt@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Sun, 4 Oct 2015 09:48:38 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> > wrote: > > >In article <mur30c$b3b$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > >> > >> Government Shill #2 wrote: > >> > On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:30:38 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 04:55:49 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> It is just coincidence that NASA also cost taxpayers multi-billions of > >> >>> dollars,.....for a bag of rocks. > >> >> > >> >> Is that what you think is the extent of NASA's Space Program ? > >> > > >> > Neil Degrasse Tyson on the NASA budget: > >> > https://youtu.be/l3BVjYFyF5M?t=22m24s > >> > >> > >> Who else could have come up with $10,000. hammers, and multi-million toilets > >> that don't work. > > > >Do you REALLY believe the $10000 for a hammer actually went for a > >hammer? $1000 for a screwdriver? Really? > > > > In the film, "Independence Day," Judd Hirsch had a great line. > Well, he had a few, but one applies here. His character, Julius, is > speaking with the President. > > President Thomas Whitmore: I don't understand, where does all this > come from? How do you get funding for something like this? > > Julius Levinson: You don't actually think they spend $20,000 on a > hammer, $30,000 on a toilet seat, do you? That's what I was going for. > > >> Now tell me why NASA is under the direct control of the pentagon,.....who we > >> KNOW can't be trusted. > > > >Why not? Please tell me all about it? > > I would enjoy reading it too. Could be a classic kOOkrant. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-04 11:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <dni21blc6fn5t9m1d4tcnl6stsamq53mk9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #269046 |
On Sun, 4 Oct 2015 07:38:39 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Government Shill #2 wrote: >> On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:30:38 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 04:55:49 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> It is just coincidence that NASA also cost taxpayers multi-billions of >>>> dollars,.....for a bag of rocks. >>> >>> Is that what you think is the extent of NASA's Space Program ? >> >> Neil Degrasse Tyson on the NASA budget: >> https://youtu.be/l3BVjYFyF5M?t=22m24s >> > >Who else could have come up with $10,000. hammers, and multi-million toilets >that don't work. The space toilet works. Or do you have a backyard full of warm space turds flushed from the Space Station? >Now tell me why NASA is under the direct control of the pentagon,.....who we >KNOW can't be trusted. Read up, Krazy Gurl! NASA is actually under complete control of Gen. Cosmo G. Spacely.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-04 07:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mur2in$9ju$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #268973 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 04:55:49 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> It is just coincidence that NASA also cost taxpayers multi-billions of >> dollars,.....for a bag of rocks. > > Is that what you think is the extent of NASA's Space Program ? YES, I Fully believe that 9/11 was an inside job.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-04 11:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <gki21b5e4qsgm5m8igkav2hpqn1a71prgl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #269045 |
On Sun, 4 Oct 2015 07:31:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 04:55:49 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> It is just coincidence that NASA also cost taxpayers multi-billions of >>> dollars,.....for a bag of rocks. >> >> Is that what you think is the extent of NASA's Space Program ? > >YES, I Fully believe that 9/11 was an inside job. LOL Catch up, Crazy Gurl! You're 300 pages behind us in your scripted kook book.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-01 02:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <6vjudc-e32.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #268810 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:51:14 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:31:08 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> je suis charly wrote: >>>>>> In article <muf89u$61i$1@dont-email.me>, "Bast" >>>>>> <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not sure what you think you proved by providing those links >>>>>>> other than it is perfectly reasonable to believe that the US >>>>>>> Military already had weapons over 20 years ago that were capable >>>>>>> of causing the 9/11 damage. >>>>>> >>>>>> Because they are different kinds of weapons. Bunker busters are >>>>>> heavily armorred so they will not shatter on impact; they depend on >>>>>> the bomb's kinetic energy to break through meters of reinforced >>>>>> concrete before detonating. Because cruise missiles are primarily >>>>>> horizontal trajectory the kinetic energy has to come from the fuel >>>>>> and engines. A bomb dropped from a plane get its kinetic energy from >>>>>> gravity and it has a primarily vertical trajectory. >>>>> >>>>> Are you now claiming that an explosive warhead can not be used on a >>>>> guided missile ??? >>>>> >>>>> Do you not remember how proud daddy Bush and the pentagon was of >>>>> their cruise missiles during the first gulf war. >>>>> Where they claimed and showed video of being able to not only single >>>>> out, and destroy buildings,....but could accurately target a specific >>>>> window in the building. >>>>> Those were the first generation drones, that had a video camera and >>>>> were remotely piloted.....well over a decade BEFORE 9/11. >>>> >>>> Bast Kook now thinks a smart bomb is a drone. >>>> >>>> Hahahahaha. >>> >>> >>> Anything remotely controlled is a "drone" >> >> "Anything" ? >> >> My Dodge Challenger can be remotely started by the key fob. >> >> Is my Challenger a drone? > > If you stuck a camera inside the front, sent the video signal back to your > computer at home, and told it to turn, accelerate, and brake, from your > computer, and even dump a dead body in the woods miles from your > home,.....YES it would be considered a drone. If you added wings so it could fly, it would be an RPV, but unless you added wings AND the smarts to make it autonomous, it would not be a drone. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 23:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ar8p0bp9stiv733aefgn21eic51sp4d0qr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #268817 |
On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 02:56:06 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:51:14 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:31:08 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> je suis charly wrote: >>>>>>> In article <muf89u$61i$1@dont-email.me>, "Bast" >>>>>>> <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm not sure what you think you proved by providing those links >>>>>>>> other than it is perfectly reasonable to believe that the US >>>>>>>> Military already had weapons over 20 years ago that were capable >>>>>>>> of causing the 9/11 damage. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because they are different kinds of weapons. Bunker busters are >>>>>>> heavily armorred so they will not shatter on impact; they depend on >>>>>>> the bomb's kinetic energy to break through meters of reinforced >>>>>>> concrete before detonating. Because cruise missiles are primarily >>>>>>> horizontal trajectory the kinetic energy has to come from the fuel >>>>>>> and engines. A bomb dropped from a plane get its kinetic energy from >>>>>>> gravity and it has a primarily vertical trajectory. >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you now claiming that an explosive warhead can not be used on a >>>>>> guided missile ??? >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you not remember how proud daddy Bush and the pentagon was of >>>>>> their cruise missiles during the first gulf war. >>>>>> Where they claimed and showed video of being able to not only single >>>>>> out, and destroy buildings,....but could accurately target a specific >>>>>> window in the building. >>>>>> Those were the first generation drones, that had a video camera and >>>>>> were remotely piloted.....well over a decade BEFORE 9/11. >>>>> >>>>> Bast Kook now thinks a smart bomb is a drone. >>>>> >>>>> Hahahahaha. >>>> >>>> >>>> Anything remotely controlled is a "drone" >>> >>> "Anything" ? >>> >>> My Dodge Challenger can be remotely started by the key fob. >>> >>> Is my Challenger a drone? >> >> If you stuck a camera inside the front, sent the video signal back to your >> computer at home, and told it to turn, accelerate, and brake, from your >> computer, and even dump a dead body in the woods miles from your >> home,.....YES it would be considered a drone. > >If you added wings so it could fly, it would be an RPV, but unless >you added wings AND the smarts to make it autonomous, it would not >be a drone. > ><snip remaining kook babble> Bast keeps digging deeper down into the hole she's standing in.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 22:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.307666316422e21598c2fd@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #268808 |
In article <r63p0bp9rccchbapp8oek4tdlfd3vrankt@4ax.com>, ninety7gt@cox.net says... > > On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:51:14 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > > > > > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:31:08 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> je suis charly wrote: > >>>> In article <muf89u$61i$1@dont-email.me>, "Bast" > >>>> <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I'm not sure what you think you proved by providing those links other > >>>>> than it is perfectly reasonable to believe that the US Military > >>>>> already had weapons over 20 years ago that were capable of causing > >>>>> the 9/11 damage. > >>>> > >>>> Because they are different kinds of weapons. Bunker busters are > >>>> heavily armorred so they will not shatter on impact; they depend on > >>>> the bomb's kinetic energy to break through meters of reinforced > >>>> concrete before detonating. Because cruise missiles are primarily > >>>> horizontal trajectory the kinetic energy has to come from the fuel > >>>> and engines. A bomb dropped from a plane get its kinetic energy from > >>>> gravity and it has a primarily vertical trajectory. > >>> > >>> Are you now claiming that an explosive warhead can not be used on a > >>> guided missile ??? > >>> > >>> Do you not remember how proud daddy Bush and the pentagon was of their > >>> cruise missiles during the first gulf war. > >>> Where they claimed and showed video of being able to not only single > >>> out, and destroy buildings,....but could accurately target a specific > >>> window in the building. > >>> Those were the first generation drones, that had a video camera and > >>> were remotely piloted.....well over a decade BEFORE 9/11. > >> > >> Bast Kook now thinks a smart bomb is a drone. > >> > >> Hahahahaha. > > > > > >Anything remotely controlled is a "drone" > > "Anything" ? > > My Dodge Challenger can be remotely started by the key fob. > > Is my Challenger a drone? To Bast, it probably is. But she's dumber than, well, just about anything, so what else should we expect. Mine's a 2010 R/T in Hemi Orange, what year/color is yours? -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 23:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <df7p0blff896skdf6fbgnm6cn6q1drhe5q@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #268813 |
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 22:36:25 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote: >In article <r63p0bp9rccchbapp8oek4tdlfd3vrankt@4ax.com>, >ninety7gt@cox.net says... >> >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:51:14 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:31:08 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> je suis charly wrote: >> >>>> In article <muf89u$61i$1@dont-email.me>, "Bast" >> >>>> <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> I'm not sure what you think you proved by providing those links other >> >>>>> than it is perfectly reasonable to believe that the US Military >> >>>>> already had weapons over 20 years ago that were capable of causing >> >>>>> the 9/11 damage. >> >>>> >> >>>> Because they are different kinds of weapons. Bunker busters are >> >>>> heavily armorred so they will not shatter on impact; they depend on >> >>>> the bomb's kinetic energy to break through meters of reinforced >> >>>> concrete before detonating. Because cruise missiles are primarily >> >>>> horizontal trajectory the kinetic energy has to come from the fuel >> >>>> and engines. A bomb dropped from a plane get its kinetic energy from >> >>>> gravity and it has a primarily vertical trajectory. >> >>> >> >>> Are you now claiming that an explosive warhead can not be used on a >> >>> guided missile ??? >> >>> >> >>> Do you not remember how proud daddy Bush and the pentagon was of their >> >>> cruise missiles during the first gulf war. >> >>> Where they claimed and showed video of being able to not only single >> >>> out, and destroy buildings,....but could accurately target a specific >> >>> window in the building. >> >>> Those were the first generation drones, that had a video camera and >> >>> were remotely piloted.....well over a decade BEFORE 9/11. >> >> >> >> Bast Kook now thinks a smart bomb is a drone. >> >> >> >> Hahahahaha. >> > >> > >> >Anything remotely controlled is a "drone" >> >> "Anything" ? >> >> My Dodge Challenger can be remotely started by the key fob. >> >> Is my Challenger a drone? > >To Bast, it probably is. But she's dumber than, well, just about >anything, so what else should we expect. LOL. True. >Mine's a 2010 R/T in Hemi Orange, what year/color is yours? A fellow Challenger owner! :) Mine's a 2009 Hemi Orange SRT. Here's a picture taken about a week after I got it in Feb 2009. https://www.dropbox.com/s/184vp3y92icudjz/2009%20SRT.jpg?dl=0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-01 10:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3077092ce641df4c98c2ff@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #268816 |
In article <df7p0blff896skdf6fbgnm6cn6q1drhe5q@4ax.com>, ninety7gt@cox.net says... > > On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 22:36:25 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> > wrote: > > >In article <r63p0bp9rccchbapp8oek4tdlfd3vrankt@4ax.com>, > >ninety7gt@cox.net says... > >> > >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:51:14 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > > >> >Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >> >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:31:08 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> je suis charly wrote: > >> >>>> In article <muf89u$61i$1@dont-email.me>, "Bast" > >> >>>> <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> I'm not sure what you think you proved by providing those links other > >> >>>>> than it is perfectly reasonable to believe that the US Military > >> >>>>> already had weapons over 20 years ago that were capable of causing > >> >>>>> the 9/11 damage. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Because they are different kinds of weapons. Bunker busters are > >> >>>> heavily armorred so they will not shatter on impact; they depend on > >> >>>> the bomb's kinetic energy to break through meters of reinforced > >> >>>> concrete before detonating. Because cruise missiles are primarily > >> >>>> horizontal trajectory the kinetic energy has to come from the fuel > >> >>>> and engines. A bomb dropped from a plane get its kinetic energy from > >> >>>> gravity and it has a primarily vertical trajectory. > >> >>> > >> >>> Are you now claiming that an explosive warhead can not be used on a > >> >>> guided missile ??? > >> >>> > >> >>> Do you not remember how proud daddy Bush and the pentagon was of their > >> >>> cruise missiles during the first gulf war. > >> >>> Where they claimed and showed video of being able to not only single > >> >>> out, and destroy buildings,....but could accurately target a specific > >> >>> window in the building. > >> >>> Those were the first generation drones, that had a video camera and > >> >>> were remotely piloted.....well over a decade BEFORE 9/11. > >> >> > >> >> Bast Kook now thinks a smart bomb is a drone. > >> >> > >> >> Hahahahaha. > >> > > >> > > >> >Anything remotely controlled is a "drone" > >> > >> "Anything" ? > >> > >> My Dodge Challenger can be remotely started by the key fob. > >> > >> Is my Challenger a drone? > > > >To Bast, it probably is. But she's dumber than, well, just about > >anything, so what else should we expect. > > LOL. True. > > > >Mine's a 2010 R/T in Hemi Orange, what year/color is yours? > > > A fellow Challenger owner! :) Mine's a 2009 Hemi Orange SRT. > Here's a picture taken about a week after I got it in Feb 2009. > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/184vp3y92icudjz/2009%20SRT.jpg?dl=0 Mine looks identical to this one. I don't have any pics of my car on this PC.. https://www.google.com/url? sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved= 0CAcQjRxqFQoTCPv8kbK5ocgCFcwaPgodq5MDjw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mibz.com% 2F2155-detonator-yellow-a-new-high-impact-colort-for-the-2010-dodge- challanger-rt-classic.html&psig=AFQjCNEt3IWLJbGIhjRTZkidD8lRFOtqgQ&ust= 1443794926555214 About a year from now, I'll be ordering a Scat Pack, I want a year off from payments.. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 13 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 … 18 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.conspiracy
csiph-web