Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence

Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics
Subject	Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence
References	(1 earlier) <yOadnbjXsNMOSkTInZ2dnUU7-TOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <AqCdnRL7XZRJRUTInZ2dnUU7-TGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <63cpac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <YKednVuJFMz_i0fInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <0c999aec28e81483a2c0d7daf4d67b78@dizum.com>
Date	2015-08-24 13:28 -0400
From	"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Organization	AUKTard Polizia
Message-ID	<op.x3vusyontm21m2@benson.localhost> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:42:41 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Rocky, in <news:YKednVuJFMz_i0fInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>> news:63cpac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> BTW it has already been proven that the media changed the audio from
>>>> broadcast to broadcast so what you are hearing in the "collapse"  
>>>> videos
>>>> could be a bogus soundtrack because I believe vaporized buildings make
>>>> very
>>>> little noise and they certainly don't crash to the ground as proven by
>>>> the
>>>> low seismic readings of the great 9/11 hoax.
>>>
>>> The energy of a building collapse is miniscule compared to a nuclear
>>> explosion, kook.
>>
>> A<SMACKAKOOK!>
>>
>> I on the other hand have evidence of the ground shaking and a matching  
>> EMP
>> when the nuke under WTC3 was detonated.  <G>
>
> The ground shook because 1.5 million tons of concrete and steel were
> shifting as the central column buckled, you idiotic gullible dumshit.
>
> And there was no "EMP"... there was a firefighter *inside* one of the
> WTC towers *as* *it* *collapsed*... an EMP would have knocked that
> camera out, blown out its electronics. Not to mention an EMP would
> have blown out electrical substations, burned out electrical
> generation stations, caused helicopters to fall from the sky, burned
> out every single fucking camera in a radius of dozens of miles. That
> there is video of the event *as* it happened and immediately *after*
> it happened proves there were *no* EMPs. At all. Your kooky conspiracy
> theory is impossible.
>
> Not to mention the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were
> found anywhere in NYC. They found trace amounts of tritium from the
> aircraft exit signs and law enforecement weapons sights, they found
> trace amounts of radon from industrial processes unrelated to nuclear
> weapons and *every* other form of radiation was at background levels.
>
> Get back on your meds, you delusional psychotic retard.
>
> Kook. LOL
>
>> Th<SMACKAKOOK!>
>
> Idiotic mouth-breathers will have their delusional blathering bullshit
> shouted down, stomped into the dirt and raucously laughed at. If you
> weren't such a delusional retard, you'd realize what a fool you're
> making of yourself.
>
> Kook. LOL
>
>> Rocky
>
> Now, get to addressing the 17 ways your kook conspiracy theory
> violates the laws of physics:
>
> ======================================================
> 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of
> collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below
> the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to
> today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that
> depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's
> *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al
> Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human
> history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep
> Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep.
>
> 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an
> EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a
> nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of
> the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused
> the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would
> have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the
> immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized
> your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for
> dozens of miles radius.
>
> 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's
> no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been
> from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of
> radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the
> tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights
> that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a
> nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how
> delusional you are.
>
> 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or
> anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>).
> They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement
> weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear
> weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation.
>
> 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be
> sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people
> in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed,
> from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2
> MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were
> buried.
>
> 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron
> source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay
> byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it
> decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon
> poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger
> being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any
> sort of nuclear chain reaction.
>
> 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it*
> *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical
> support column and *NO* EMP:
> ======================
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo>
> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column
> buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount
> of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP.
> ======================
>
> 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to
> survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be
> approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature
> would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K?
>
> 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a
> hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding
> rock.
>
> 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic
> taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of
> satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were
> detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects
> were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft.
>
> 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent
> down to service those nukes (because now that you know the
> neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a
> periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire
> facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the
> technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with
> "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area
> the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to
> admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33
> years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960
> to 1840 degree heat?
>
> 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>)
> that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all
> 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the
> Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your
> kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized"
> (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)?
>
> 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic
> signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC
> site on 11 Sep 2001?
>
> 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris
> kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep
> underground, Ko0K?
>
> 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have
> tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles
> deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC
> complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to
> detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up
> your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which
> you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference
> was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion
> started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The
> Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.).
>
> 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes
> (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your
> previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3
> nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming
> under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in
> agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is?
> While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps
> (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was
> primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any
> contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in
> place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this
> *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed
> "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where
> your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly
> head again. LOL
>
> 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your
> "34 or more nukes" blather... eventually, your broken brain will be
> telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by
> 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes
> which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground
> MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet
> and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC
> and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the
> fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn
> out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every
> piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's
> *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL
>
> Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back
> on your meds, you delusional loon.
> ======================================================
>
> There are now 17 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of
> physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by
> point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp
> simple physics.
>
> Kook. LOL
>

i know you're fighting with another K0ok like yourself, but last i  
checked, there is no written-on-paper guarantee that EMP knocks out any  
random electronic device.

i would surmise that some will survive an EMP, especially those designed  
recently which happen to luckily have active circuit protection.

...not that i k0okily believe nukes went off in WTC or that global warming  
is 97% of the world's climatologists trying to kontrol the world, or  
anything.

:)

-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

--

Thread

NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:17 -0500
  NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:23 -0500
    Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:29 -0500
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:38 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:55 +0000
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:23 -0500
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 19:51 +0000
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 22:09 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 06:15 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:09 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:08 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:33 -0500
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 14:42 -0500
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:51 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:05 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 15:13 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:54 -0500
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:08 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 15:39 -0500
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-23 03:56 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 13:39 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-24 18:37 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-24 17:24 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-24 22:46 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-25 15:28 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-25 14:12 -0500
                Re: Rocky's delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-25 21:45 +0000
                Re: Rocky's delusions "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 17:05 -0500
                Re: Rocky's delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-25 22:28 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 17:05 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-26 06:09 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-26 16:57 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-26 10:54 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 20:22 -0500
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:39 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:22 +0000
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:54 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 19:14 +0000
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:39 -0700
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:17 -0500
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 21:30 +0000
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 15:08 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 18:00 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 00:05 +0000
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:16 +0100
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:04 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:03 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 23:42 +0200
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:12 -0500
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 01:21 +0200
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 00:06 +0000
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 13:28 -0400
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 12:45 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 17:54 +0000
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 05:41 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 11:05 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 20:53 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 15:51 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:33 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 07:47 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (FNN stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 08:34 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (FNN stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 09:55 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 09:36 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 11:00 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 15:43 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 16:52 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 14:14 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:00 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:12 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 21:24 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:52 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 22:15 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 19:19 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 23:52 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-27 04:12 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:04 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 13:11 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Note 4 jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 09:25 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Note 4 jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:05 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 12:45 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Note 4 jim) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:04 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Note 4 jim) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-28 11:30 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Note 4 jim) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:39 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Note 4 jim) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-28 23:16 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-26 18:29 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 19:29 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-27 09:48 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (NORAD lied) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 09:19 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (NORAD lied) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 10:34 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 16:26 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:40 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 04:47 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:01 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (FNN stupid) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:08 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (FNN stupid) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:27 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (FNN stupid) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-27 10:00 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (FNN stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:13 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:12 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 16:26 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-27 14:28 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:42 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 14:54 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 17:04 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 15:13 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 23:05 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 23:52 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:51 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:22 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:11 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 08:55 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 19:02 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:58 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 23:53 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 22:06 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is   worthlesss) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-29 08:49 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:05 +0100
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 22:29 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 16:42 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 05:43 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:10 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 20:10 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:24 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:27 +0200
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 20:49 +0200
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:34 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 02:05 +0200
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 00:08 +0000
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:05 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:12 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 20:23 +0000
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:35 -0700
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:03 -0500
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 19:09 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:36 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 07:02 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 06:17 +0000
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:37 +0000
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:07 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:15 +0100
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:06 -0500
    Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:19 +0000
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:57 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 19:16 +0000
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:35 -0700
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-08-23 13:42 -0700
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:05 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:57 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 21:32 +0000
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:05 -0500
  Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:04 -0500

csiph-web