Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #271767
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy |
| Subject | Re: the elite |
| Date | 2015-12-06 07:59 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <dci4naFils4U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <55876b1sc7k4blsjtkpp5hink4v3rc1kt3@4ax.com> |
Am 06.12.2015 03:42, schrieb Topaz: > > http://www.toqonline.com/ > > An enduring aspect of the self-concept of Jews is > that their ascent to elite status in America and elsewhere is the > natural result of a meritocracy. If you read the Tora instead of the Bible, this in itself would not make you a better person, but would require to understand Hebrew and that is certainly a challenge. So possibly the term 'Jew' actually means 'selected' and hence Jews are better in certain tasks (like speaking Hebrew). On the other hand, they are not that many, so the chance of such an elite to gain political power are very small. Other believers (like Hindus, Buddhists or Shintoists) have certainly also brilliant minds among their ranks, hence could participate in such a 'meritocracy'. The term actually means something like 'governemnt by wise men/women'. This sounds not that bad at all, since e.g. a few former US presidents seemed to be unable to eat without hurting themselves. > For example, after Elena Kagan > was nominated for the Supreme Court, Robert Frank penned an article in > the Wall Street Journal hailing the rise of a meritocracy where > Jews could finally assume their rightful place as an elite, > and cheering the demise of those lazy, corrupt WASPs who did > everything they could to thwart the rise of the Jews, including > placing limits on Jewish enrollment in the elite universities. Did THAT happen? This sounds like an idea, that is not supported by reality. The USA have, nevertheless, confessional universities and collages, that are linked to certain social and economic groups. The access to e.g. Georgetown is limited to Jesuits and Jews can't be that. Well, many people cannot do many things. This is in fact no big deal, since important is, what you can do, not what you can't. The > fact that Kagan is remarkably unqualified to be a Supreme > Court Justice in terms of the usual standards (judicial > experience, academic publications, or even courtroom > experience) never seems to have entered his mind. In > Frank's view, her ascent from Princeton undergraduate to Harvard > Law, to high-level government positions and dean of Harvard Law is > the American meritocracy in action-a view that conveniently ignores > the role of her Jewish ethnic connections in greasing her ascent, most > egregiously her appointment as dean of Harvard Law by Larry Summers. 'Meritocracy' is actually meant as 'rise by OWN merits', not by inherited merits. So it is irrelevant, what your forefather have done and to what kind of church they had belonged. Important is only, what the person in question DOES. If people are promoted by 'invisible hands' and for other reasons than personal talents, this is a different system (elitism, corporatism etc.). TH
Back to alt.conspiracy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
the elite Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-05 20:42 -0600
Re: the elite Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-06 07:59 +0100
Re: Re: the elite Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-06 04:19 -0600
Re: the elite Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-07 10:08 +0100
Re: Re: the elite Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-07 16:06 -0600
Re: the elite Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-08 07:10 +0100
Re: Re: the elite Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-08 19:37 -0600
csiph-web