Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.conspiracy.cabal > #8

Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers?

From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.america-at-war, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.conspiracy.cabal
Subject Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers?
Date 2018-06-24 20:14 +0200
Message-ID <fpa5d0F7mssU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <vf0qid1kjj3gde34l53m5il80oomi2ekbe@4ax.com> <fp6ppfFicrsU1@mid.individual.net> <c5nsidtdl2n8t4srtn3cih13t5o0p1gf67@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Am 23.06.2018 um 16:44 schrieb KWills Shill #3:
>> The remains of the Twin Towers look a little similar to what Hutchison
>> produced on small scale.
>>
>> Another assumption was, that some sort of 'time machine' was used, which
>> teleported the material into another dimension.
>>
>       You constantly use your baseless assumptions to support your
> impossible delusions.
> 
>> This is at least a little plausible, since from the roughly one million
>> tons of material the towers were build from only 10 to 20 percent were
>> found later.
>>
>       Only the smallest of fractions of material was not found. Less
> than 1% was not accounted for.
>       What was not present was likely that which went over the water.
> 


Well, no!

The towers consisted - like most buildings - from about 10% building 
materials, like concrete, steel, glass, aluminum, plaster boards, 
carpets and other.

Since the towers were about 400m high and had about 100 floors, the pile 
of rubble had to be a cone of roughly the hight of the tenth floor 
(supposed the materials were ground to fine dust and were compacted into 
such a pile without any air).

But the material barely covered the street level.

This is visible in many photos from that day, which were made prior to 
the cleanup.

Such photos show cars, trucks and ambulances in the rubble. And they 
have certainly not flown at the level of the tenth floor.

TH

Back to alt.conspiracy.cabal | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

What Really Struck the Twin Towers? Stuart Wright <preacherstu@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 07:17 -0700
  Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 23:47 +0800
  Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-06-23 13:38 +0200
    Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? KWills Shill #3 <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 07:44 -0700
      Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-06-24 20:14 +0200
        Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? KWills Shill #3 <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 02:44 -0700
          Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-06-27 15:46 +0200
            Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? KWills Shill #3 <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2018-06-28 03:06 -0700
              Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-06-28 18:50 +0200
                Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? KWills Shill #3 <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 02:54 -0700
  Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? KWills Shill #3 <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 07:43 -0700
    Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 04:33 +0800
  Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? Stuart Wright <preacherstu@gmail.com> - 2018-06-28 19:53 +0000
    Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? KWills Shill #3 <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 02:54 -0700
      Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? Stuart Wright <preacherstu@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 06:46 -0700
        Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? KWills Shill #3 <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2018-06-30 04:46 -0700

csiph-web