Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy.cabal > #8
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.america-at-war, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.conspiracy.cabal |
| Subject | Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? |
| Date | 2018-06-24 20:14 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <fpa5d0F7mssU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <vf0qid1kjj3gde34l53m5il80oomi2ekbe@4ax.com> <fp6ppfFicrsU1@mid.individual.net> <c5nsidtdl2n8t4srtn3cih13t5o0p1gf67@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Am 23.06.2018 um 16:44 schrieb KWills Shill #3: >> The remains of the Twin Towers look a little similar to what Hutchison >> produced on small scale. >> >> Another assumption was, that some sort of 'time machine' was used, which >> teleported the material into another dimension. >> > You constantly use your baseless assumptions to support your > impossible delusions. > >> This is at least a little plausible, since from the roughly one million >> tons of material the towers were build from only 10 to 20 percent were >> found later. >> > Only the smallest of fractions of material was not found. Less > than 1% was not accounted for. > What was not present was likely that which went over the water. > Well, no! The towers consisted - like most buildings - from about 10% building materials, like concrete, steel, glass, aluminum, plaster boards, carpets and other. Since the towers were about 400m high and had about 100 floors, the pile of rubble had to be a cone of roughly the hight of the tenth floor (supposed the materials were ground to fine dust and were compacted into such a pile without any air). But the material barely covered the street level. This is visible in many photos from that day, which were made prior to the cleanup. Such photos show cars, trucks and ambulances in the rubble. And they have certainly not flown at the level of the tenth floor. TH
Back to alt.conspiracy.cabal | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What Really Struck the Twin Towers? Stuart Wright <preacherstu@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 07:17 -0700
Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 23:47 +0800
Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-06-23 13:38 +0200
Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? KWills Shill #3 <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 07:44 -0700
Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-06-24 20:14 +0200
Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? KWills Shill #3 <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 02:44 -0700
Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-06-27 15:46 +0200
Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? KWills Shill #3 <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2018-06-28 03:06 -0700
Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-06-28 18:50 +0200
Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? KWills Shill #3 <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 02:54 -0700
Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? KWills Shill #3 <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 07:43 -0700
Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 04:33 +0800
Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? Stuart Wright <preacherstu@gmail.com> - 2018-06-28 19:53 +0000
Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? KWills Shill #3 <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 02:54 -0700
Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? Stuart Wright <preacherstu@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 06:46 -0700
Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers? KWills Shill #3 <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2018-06-30 04:46 -0700
csiph-web