Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.computer.security > #6016 > unrolled thread

David - questions about your post

Started byDiesel <nobody@haph.org>
First post2019-02-20 08:34 +0000
Last post2019-03-13 21:29 -0500
Articles 20 on this page of 73 — 11 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.computer.security


Contents

  David - questions about your post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-20 08:34 +0000
    Re: David - questions about your post John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-20 17:06 -0800
    Re: David - questions about your post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-21 02:45 +0000
      Re: David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 09:18 +0000
        Re: David - questions about your post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-21 12:12 -0300
          Re: David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 15:34 +0000
            Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-21 13:48 -0300
              Re: [OT]David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 08:45 +0000
                Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-22 06:34 -0300
                  Re: [OT]David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 10:06 +0000
                    Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-22 16:06 -0300
                      Re: [OT]David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 20:05 +0000
                        Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-02-22 14:19 -0600
                          Re: [OT]David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 20:54 +0000
                            Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-02-22 15:42 -0600
                    Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Mk5000 <marika5000@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 00:10 -0600
                      Re: [OT]David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 07:59 +0000
                        Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-26 12:08 -0300
                          Re: [OT]David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 17:35 +0000
                            Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-03-01 04:23 +0000
                              Re: [OT]David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 10:22 +0000
                                Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-03-01 10:28 -0300
                                  Re: [OT]David - questions about your post John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-03-01 08:02 -0800
                                  Re: [OT]David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 11:53 +0000
                                    Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-03-03 04:36 +0000
                                      Re: [OT]David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 14:49 +0000
                                        Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-03-05 04:29 +0000
                                        Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Mk5000 <marika5000@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 19:05 -0600
                                Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-03-01 10:47 -0600
                                  Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-03-10 02:13 +0000
                                    Re: [OT]David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 08:24 +0000
                                      Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-03-12 23:53 +0000
                                        Re: [OT]David - questions about your post The Supreme Cathead <pooh@IPaddress.invalid> - 2019-03-13 01:17 +0000
                                          Re: [OT]David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-03-15 22:54 +0000
                                            Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-03-16 01:40 +0000
                                              Re: [OT]David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-03-16 14:26 +0000
                                              Re: [OT]David - questions about your post [Pooh, Dusty is the victim here!] Shit the Cat <supersecret@IPaddress.invalid> - 2019-03-16 20:45 +0000
                                                Re: [OT]David - questions about your post [Pooh, Dusty is the victim here!] "p-0''0-h the cat (coder)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2019-03-16 20:53 +0000
                                                  Re: [OT]David - questions about your post [Pooh, Dusty is the victim here!] Spit the Cat <supersecret@IPaddress.invalid> - 2019-03-16 20:56 +0000
                                    Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-03-10 15:12 -0500
                                      Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Mk5000 <marika5000@gmail.com> - 2019-03-11 21:51 -0500
                                        Re: [OT]David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-03-12 07:34 +0000
                                          Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Mk5000 <marika5000@gmail.com> - 2019-03-13 21:22 -0500
                                            Re: [OT]David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-03-14 08:50 +0000
                                Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-03-03 04:36 +0000
                                  Re: [OT]David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 14:51 +0000
                                    Re: [OT]David - questions about your post John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-03-03 07:22 -0800
                                    Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-03-05 04:29 +0000
                  Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Mk5000 <marika5000@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 00:04 -0600
                    Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-26 12:04 -0300
                      Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Mk5000 <marika5000@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 17:49 -0600
                        Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-27 08:58 -0300
        Re: David - questions about your post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-23 04:16 +0000
    Re: David - questions about your post "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <Your_Colonel@usa.com> - 2019-02-23 13:09 -0800
      Re: David - questions about your post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-03-01 04:23 +0000
        Re: David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-03-12 08:32 +0000
          Re: David - questions about your post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-03-12 23:53 +0000
            Re: David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-03-13 00:27 +0000
              Re: David - questions about your post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-03-13 01:30 +0000
                Re: David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-03-13 22:34 +0000
                  Re: David - questions about your post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-03-14 02:28 +0000
                    Re: David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-03-14 08:54 +0000
                      Re: David - questions about your post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-03-14 17:08 +0000
                        Re: David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-03-14 17:52 +0000
                          Re: David - questions about your post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-03-15 01:48 +0000
                            Re: David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-03-15 10:08 +0000
                              Re: David - questions about your post Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-03-15 09:26 -0500
                                Re: [OT]David - questions about your post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-03-15 12:13 -0300
                                Re: David - questions about your post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-03-16 01:40 +0000
                                  Re: David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-03-16 14:30 +0000
                              Re: David - questions about your post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-03-16 01:40 +0000
                                Re: David - questions about your post David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-03-16 14:32 +0000
          Re: David - questions about your post Mk5000 <marika5000@gmail.com> - 2019-03-13 21:29 -0500

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →


#6046 — Re: [OT]David - questions about your post

FromDavid in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com>
Date2019-03-01 10:22 +0000
SubjectRe: [OT]David - questions about your post
Message-ID<0K7eE.696$WX2.118@fx16.fr7>
In reply to#6043
On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
> He doesn't have the established track record that you have David.

That's probably true.

I've been 'huntin' bad guys' - bad guys like you, Dustin - since 2006.

-- 
David B.
Devon, UK

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6047 — Re: [OT]David - questions about your post

FromShadow <Sh@dow.br>
Date2019-03-01 10:28 -0300
SubjectRe: [OT]David - questions about your post
Message-ID<uoci7e1dcvg2is2hk1j7r9dlg7toctbhee@4ax.com>
In reply to#6046
On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 10:22:49 +0000, David in Devon
<BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:

>On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
>> He doesn't have the established track record that you have David.
>
>That's probably true.
>
>I've been 'huntin' bad guys' - bad guys like you, Dustin - since 2006.

	Proof of any arrests ? Please post the court records which
state YOU as the source of information.

<https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
	TIA
	[]'s
-- 
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012
Nineteen Eighty-Four was a work of FICTION !!!! - Orwell

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6048 — Re: [OT]David - questions about your post

FromJohn McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net>
Date2019-03-01 08:02 -0800
SubjectRe: [OT]David - questions about your post
Message-ID<q5bl23$l7g$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#6047
On 3/1/19   PDT 5:28 AM, Shadow wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 10:22:49 +0000, David in Devon
> <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
>>> He doesn't have the established track record that you have David.
>>
>> That's probably true.
>>
>> I've been 'huntin' bad guys' - bad guys like you, Dustin - since 2006.
> 
> 	Proof of any arrests ? Please post the court records which
> state YOU as the source of information.
> 
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
> 	TIA
> 	[]'s
> 
X-S posting

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6050 — Re: [OT]David - questions about your post

FromDavid in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com>
Date2019-03-02 11:53 +0000
SubjectRe: [OT]David - questions about your post
Message-ID<39ueE.28423$7p3.18488@fx28.fr7>
In reply to#6047
On 01/03/2019 13:28, Shadow wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 10:22:49 +0000, David in Devon
> <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
>>> He doesn't have the established track record that you have David.
>>
>> That's probably true.
>>
>> I've been 'huntin' bad guys' - bad guys like you, Dustin - since 2006.
> 
> 	Proof of any arrests ? Please post the court records which
> state YOU as the source of information.
> 
> https://www.completelyfreesoftware.com/reviews/du_w31_BUGHUN.html
> 	TIA
> 	[]'s

Dustin's arrest is still pending.

He knows that, and lives in fear. :-(

-- 
David B.
Devon, UK

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6053 — Re: [OT]David - questions about your post

FromDiesel <nobody@haph.org>
Date2019-03-03 04:36 +0000
SubjectRe: [OT]David - questions about your post
Message-ID<XnsAA06F1100C668HT1@AI0E4lsr69ViY380BvwYrN.5O>
In reply to#6050
David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:39ueE.28423$7p3.18488@fx28.fr7 Sat, 02 Mar 2019 11:53:33 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote: 

> On 01/03/2019 13:28, Shadow wrote:
>> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 10:22:49 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
>>>> He doesn't have the established track record that you have
>>>> David. 
>>>
>>> That's probably true.
>>>
>>> I've been 'huntin' bad guys' - bad guys like you, Dustin - since
>>> 2006. 
>> 
>>      Proof of any arrests ? Please post the court records which
>> state YOU as the source of information.
>> 
>> https://www.completelyfreesoftware.com/reviews/du_w31_BUGHUN.html
>>      TIA
>>      []'s
> 
> Dustin's arrest is still pending.
> 
> He knows that, and lives in fear. :-(

More lies. No surprise since you're the author of the post i'm
responding to. I wonder though, why are you replacing Shadows url: 
 
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

With BugHunters (my program) glowing review and recommendation as a
must have for all pc users? I don't mind the free press, but your
over ten years too late with the support, stalker. 


-- 
'ANARCHY NOW!' - Milo Bloom

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6055 — Re: [OT]David - questions about your post

FromDavid in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com>
Date2019-03-03 14:49 +0000
SubjectRe: [OT]David - questions about your post
Message-ID<YPReE.76$We4.15@fx01.fr7>
In reply to#6053
On 03/03/2019 04:36, Diesel wrote:
[....]
> With BugHunters (my program) glowing review and recommendation as a
> must have for all pc users? I don't mind the free press, but your
> over ten years too late with the support, master.

It's "you're", Grasshopper!

-- 
David B.
Devon, UK

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6068 — Re: [OT]David - questions about your post

FromDiesel <nobody@haph.org>
Date2019-03-05 04:29 +0000
SubjectRe: [OT]David - questions about your post
Message-ID<XnsAA08EFBB8116HT1@doCX0.74.zmu4y91>
In reply to#6055
David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> news:YPReE.76$We4.15@fx01.fr7 
Sun, 03 Mar 2019 14:49:28 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> On 03/03/2019 04:36, Diesel wrote:
> [....]
>> With BugHunters (my program) glowing review and recommendation as a
>> must have for all pc users? I don't mind the free press, but your
>> over ten years too late with the support, master.
> 
> It's "you're", Grasshopper!

Aren't you a little old for post editing, David?

Avoidance also noted. 
 



-- 
'When you do a good deed, get a receipt, in case heaven is like the 
IRS.'

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6077 — Re: [OT]David - questions about your post

FromMk5000 <marika5000@gmail.com>
Date2019-03-05 19:05 -0600
SubjectRe: [OT]David - questions about your post
Message-ID<osadnVj9UsRwgeLBnZ2dnUU7-L_NnZ2d@earthlink.com>
In reply to#6055
David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
> On 03/03/2019 04:36, Diesel wrote:
> [....]
>> With BugHunters (my program) glowing review and recommendation as a
>> must have for all pc users? I don't mind the free press, but your
>> over ten years too late with the support, master.
> 
> It's "you're", Grasshopper!
> 

Yea even I got that one

Looking for olive branches, I noticed the bushes while I was figuring out
laundry and thought hey I bet those are roses 

There's quite a few of them and I don't remember them bein there last year 

I finally saw a bloom today and enjoyed it

Mk5000

Grasshopper cannot stop her roaming,
And her home and friends don’t mean anything no more.
Showstopper, you cannot top her.
With a cowboy grace, can’t stay in one place too long (too long).— mamas
and the papas 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6049 — Re: [OT]David - questions about your post

FromChar Jackson <none@none.invalid>
Date2019-03-01 10:47 -0600
SubjectRe: [OT]David - questions about your post
Message-ID<kdoi7e1n0q9detovaini9huc6rv0uk0n6n@4ax.com>
In reply to#6046
On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 10:22:49 +0000, David in Devon
<BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:

>On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
>> He doesn't have the established track record that you have David.
>
>That's probably true.
>
>I've been 'huntin' bad guys' - bad guys like you, Dustin - since 2006.

You probably shouldn't bring that up. A dozen years of stalking and not
a single success so far makes you look like a loser and a fool.

-- 
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:

<https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6088 — Re: [OT]David - questions about your post

FromDiesel <nobody@haph.org>
Date2019-03-10 02:13 +0000
SubjectRe: [OT]David - questions about your post
Message-ID<XnsAA0DD8B5E92DHT1@z9N01wwrS1Nmxve.kVQN5218aQH4jdnXnZqbsO8YW74TRcX4>
In reply to#6049
Char Jackson <none@none.invalid>
news:kdoi7e1n0q9detovaini9huc6rv0uk0n6n@4ax.com Fri, 01 Mar 2019
16:47:02 GMT in alt.2600, wrote: 

> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 10:22:49 +0000, David in Devon
> <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
>>> He doesn't have the established track record that you have
>>> David. 
>>
>>That's probably true.
>>
>>I've been 'huntin' bad guys' - bad guys like you, Dustin - since
>>2006. 
> 
> You probably shouldn't bring that up. A dozen years of stalking
> and not a single success so far makes you look like a loser and a
> fool. 
> 

Well, he did get quite friendly with pcbutts for awhile. A known code 
thief and liar, amongst other things David is okay with. pcbutts is the 
one who turned him onto me when he asked if pcbutts knew anyone with 
real skill. Yes, I know about that too David. [g] I've been saving it 
for a special occasion. HAHAHAHAA.


-- 
You can't have everything...where would you put it?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6089 — Re: [OT]David - questions about your post

FromDavid in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com>
Date2019-03-10 08:24 +0000
SubjectRe: [OT]David - questions about your post
Message-ID<_Q3hE.18215$_f4.6555@fx08.fr7>
In reply to#6088
On 10/03/2019 02:13, Diesel wrote:
> Char Jackson <none@none.invalid>
> news:kdoi7e1n0q9detovaini9huc6rv0uk0n6n@4ax.com Fri, 01 Mar 2019
> 16:47:02 GMT in alt.2600, wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 10:22:49 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
>>>> He doesn't have the established track record that you have
>>>> David.
>>>
>>> That's probably true.
>>>
>>> I've been 'huntin' bad guys' - bad guys like you, Dustin - since
>>> 2006.
>>
>> You probably shouldn't bring that up. A dozen years of stalking
>> and not a single success so far makes you look like a loser and a
>> fool.
>>
> 
> Well, he did get quite friendly with pcbutts for awhile. A known code
> thief and liar, amongst other things David is okay with. pcbutts is the
> one who turned him onto me when he asked if pcbutts knew anyone with
> real skill. Yes, I know about that too David. [g] I've been saving it
> for a special occasion. HAHAHAHAA.


*Some history for newbies*!

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/Some$20history$20for$20newbies!/microsoft.public.security/BiG6HV4_mX4/ziMjDe41fM8J

HI BoaterDave,
    Join the crowd.  Your complaint is not specific to this news group or
Microsoft.  It is true of every news group which I have visited.  Large
companies no longer give out free advice.  Large companies do not monitor
news groups.  When push comes to shove, how much free advice and/or
monitoring can you expect on a one hundred or two hundred dollar retail
sale.  I have no idea if it is still true, but the Windows 98 news group 
did
not even have an automatic check to weed out filthy attack language and
counter-attacks.
Phil

=

There's even posts from Dustin here!

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/microsoft.public.security.virus/JBRjGZBjB6w%5B1-25%5D

-- 
David B.
Devon, UK

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6094 — Re: [OT]David - questions about your post

FromDiesel <nobody@haph.org>
Date2019-03-12 23:53 +0000
SubjectRe: [OT]David - questions about your post
Message-ID<XnsAA10CA6E32C41HT1@450v.oH8IW46461lO62Z1F>
In reply to#6089
David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:_Q3hE.18215$_f4.6555@fx08.fr7 Sun, 10 Mar 2019 08:24:23 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote: 

> *Some history for newbies*!
> 
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/Some$20history$20for$20new
> bies!/microsoft.public.security/BiG6HV4_mX4/ziMjDe41fM8J 
> 
> HI BoaterDave,
>     Join the crowd.  Your complaint is not specific to this news
>     group or 
> Microsoft.  It is true of every news group which I have visited. 
> Large companies no longer give out free advice.  Large companies
> do not monitor news groups.  When push comes to shove, how much
> free advice and/or monitoring can you expect on a one hundred or
> two hundred dollar retail sale.  I have no idea if it is still
> true, but the Windows 98 news group did
> not even have an automatic check to weed out filthy attack
> language and counter-attacks.
> Phil
> 
> =
> 
> There's even posts from Dustin here!
> 
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/microsoft.public.secu
> rity.virus/JBRjGZBjB6w%5B1-25%5D 

Ayep. Anyone who reads them will notice I wasn't trying to be hostile 
towards you then, either. I was still trying to offer you assistance, 
despite suspecting you were upto no good by then. And for that, you 
stalk, dox, slime and besmirch me years later on usenet. As they say, 
no good deed goes unpunished.
 



-- 
You've caught an even atom tan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6097 — Re: [OT]David - questions about your post

FromThe Supreme Cathead <pooh@IPaddress.invalid>
Date2019-03-13 01:17 +0000
SubjectRe: [OT]David - questions about your post
Message-ID<7glg8ed3jhdhcd3hkks9a69i978s7a08vj@4ax.com>
In reply to#6094
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:53:53 -0000 (UTC), Diesel <nobody@haph.org>
wrote:

>David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com>
>news:_Q3hE.18215$_f4.6555@fx08.fr7 Sun, 10 Mar 2019 08:24:23 GMT in
>alt.computer.workshop, wrote: 
>
>> *Some history for newbies*!
>> 
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/Some$20history$20for$20new
>> bies!/microsoft.public.security/BiG6HV4_mX4/ziMjDe41fM8J 
>> 
>> HI BoaterDave,
>>     Join the crowd.  Your complaint is not specific to this news
>>     group or 
>> Microsoft.  It is true of every news group which I have visited. 
>> Large companies no longer give out free advice.  Large companies
>> do not monitor news groups.  When push comes to shove, how much
>> free advice and/or monitoring can you expect on a one hundred or
>> two hundred dollar retail sale.  I have no idea if it is still
>> true, but the Windows 98 news group did
>> not even have an automatic check to weed out filthy attack
>> language and counter-attacks.
>> Phil
>> 
>> =
>> 
>> There's even posts from Dustin here!
>> 
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/microsoft.public.secu
>> rity.virus/JBRjGZBjB6w%5B1-25%5D 
>
>Ayep. Anyone who reads them will notice I wasn't trying to be hostile 
>towards you then, either. I was still trying to offer you assistance, 
>despite suspecting you were upto no good by then. And for that, you 
>stalk, dox, slime and besmirch me years later on usenet. As they say, 
>no good deed goes unpunished.

Playing the victim. Nice touch. Seriously, Shit the cat has a tear in
his eye.

Anyway, Back To Life, Back to Reality...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TB54dZkzZOY

Dusty, you have been thoroughly spanked by the Anonymous Coward. Your
true nature has been laid bare. Examples of your countless misdemeanours
have been EXPOSED to all. 

You are the Walter Mitty of Usenet. 

-- 
Look behind you. Boo, it's Pooh!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6111 — Re: [OT]David - questions about your post

FromDavid in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com>
Date2019-03-15 22:54 +0000
SubjectRe: [OT]David - questions about your post
Message-ID<Q2WiE.129523$mm6.44899@fx10.fr7>
In reply to#6097
On 13/03/2019 01:17, The Supreme Cathead wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:53:53 -0000 (UTC), Diesel <nobody@haph.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com>
>> news:_Q3hE.18215$_f4.6555@fx08.fr7 Sun, 10 Mar 2019 08:24:23 GMT in
>> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> *Some history for newbies*!
>>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/Some$20history$20for$20new
>>> bies!/microsoft.public.security/BiG6HV4_mX4/ziMjDe41fM8J
>>>
>>> HI BoaterDave,
>>>      Join the crowd.  Your complaint is not specific to this news
>>>      group or
>>> Microsoft.  It is true of every news group which I have visited.
>>> Large companies no longer give out free advice.  Large companies
>>> do not monitor news groups.  When push comes to shove, how much
>>> free advice and/or monitoring can you expect on a one hundred or
>>> two hundred dollar retail sale.  I have no idea if it is still
>>> true, but the Windows 98 news group did
>>> not even have an automatic check to weed out filthy attack
>>> language and counter-attacks.
>>> Phil
>>>
>>> =
>>>
>>> There's even posts from Dustin here!
>>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/microsoft.public.secu
>>> rity.virus/JBRjGZBjB6w%5B1-25%5D
>>
>> Ayep. Anyone who reads them will notice I wasn't trying to be hostile
>> towards you then, either. I was still trying to offer you assistance,
>> despite suspecting you were upto no good by then. And for that, you
>> stalk, dox, slime and besmirch me years later on usenet. As they say,
>> no good deed goes unpunished.
> 
> Playing the victim. Nice touch. Seriously, Shit the cat has a tear in
> his eye.
> 
> Anyway, Back To Life, Back to Reality...
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TB54dZkzZOY
> 
> Dusty, you have been thoroughly spanked by the Anonymous Coward. Your
> true nature has been laid bare. Examples of your countless misdemeanours
> have been EXPOSED to all.
> 
> You are the Walter Mitty of Usenet.


*YES*!  :-)  IAWTP


-- 
David B.
Devon, UK

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6112 — Re: [OT]David - questions about your post

FromDiesel <nobody@haph.org>
Date2019-03-16 01:40 +0000
SubjectRe: [OT]David - questions about your post
Message-ID<XnsAA13DC96DB742HT1@F8q6QXQ.Q74P.0im5NR8ulI9>
In reply to#6111
David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:Q2WiE.129523$mm6.44899@fx10.fr7 Fri, 15 Mar 2019 22:54:39 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: 

> *YES*!  :-)  IAWTP

One socking troll praising an anonymous coward that's been busted 
making up stories and lifting things out of context more times than I 
can bother counting isn't exactly what you'd call a reliable source of 
information. And, amusing, you're well aware of this, yet you'll 
support anyone else who slimes those you have a problem with or that 
you think can distract others from knowing what you actually are. More 
importantly, how dangerous you are to others privacy. You aren't 
fooling anybody.



-- 
As anyone who owns a cat knows: no one can own a cat.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6117 — Re: [OT]David - questions about your post

FromDavid in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com>
Date2019-03-16 14:26 +0000
SubjectRe: [OT]David - questions about your post
Message-ID<hI7jE.22759$TE2.17639@fx13.fr7>
In reply to#6112
On 16/03/2019 01:40, Diesel wrote:
> David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com>
> news:Q2WiE.129523$mm6.44899@fx10.fr7 Fri, 15 Mar 2019 22:54:39 GMT
> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> 
>> *YES*!  :-)  IAWTP
> 
> One socking troll praising an anonymous coward that's been busted
> making up stories and lifting things out of context more times than I
> can bother counting isn't exactly what you'd call a reliable source of
> information. And, amusing, you're well aware of this, yet you'll
> support anyone else who slimes those you have a problem with or that
> you think can distract others from knowing what you actually are. More
> importantly, how dangerous you are to others privacy. You aren't
> fooling anybody.

“*The enemy of my enemy is my friend*”.

https://www.quora.com/Who-originally-said-%E2%80%9CThe-enemy-of-my-enemy-is-my-friend%E2%80%9D

I concede that your anonymous 'enemy' HAS made errors, but most of what 
he/she posts *IS* a true reflection of your past actions, Dustin.

I'm not surprised that seeing such dreadful things again, right before 
your very eyes, must be hugely disconcerting and make you feel truly 
ashamed of what you have done.

(Follow-up set to my 'private' group)

-- 
David B.
Devon, UK

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6120 — Re: [OT]David - questions about your post [Pooh, Dusty is the victim here!]

FromShit the Cat <supersecret@IPaddress.invalid>
Date2019-03-16 20:45 +0000
SubjectRe: [OT]David - questions about your post [Pooh, Dusty is the victim here!]
Message-ID<fvnq8edf22805n8k41qbro267udctlp7s3@4ax.com>
In reply to#6112
On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 01:40:43 -0000 (UTC), Diesel <nobody@haph.org>
wrote:

>David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com>
>news:Q2WiE.129523$mm6.44899@fx10.fr7 Fri, 15 Mar 2019 22:54:39 GMT
>in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: 
>
>> *YES*!  :-)  IAWTP
>
>One socking troll praising an anonymous coward that's been busted 
>making up stories and lifting things out of context more times than I 
>can bother counting isn't exactly what you'd call a reliable source of 
>information. And, amusing, you're well aware of this, yet you'll 
>support anyone else who slimes those you have a problem with or that 
>you think can distract others from knowing what you actually are. More 
>importantly, how dangerous you are to others privacy. You aren't 
>fooling anybody.

Poor Dusty :O{

-- 
Shit the cat
Webmeister in waiting
Copyright theft advisor
http://shitsworld.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6121 — Re: [OT]David - questions about your post [Pooh, Dusty is the victim here!]

From"p-0''0-h the cat (coder)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid>
Date2019-03-16 20:53 +0000
SubjectRe: [OT]David - questions about your post [Pooh, Dusty is the victim here!]
Message-ID<c3oq8e9849nele9k7j7rjldi5v1tn9o6jf@4ax.com>
In reply to#6120
On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 20:45:12 +0000, Shit the Cat
<supersecret@IPaddress.invalid> wrote:

>On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 01:40:43 -0000 (UTC), Diesel <nobody@haph.org>
>wrote:
>
>>David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com>
>>news:Q2WiE.129523$mm6.44899@fx10.fr7 Fri, 15 Mar 2019 22:54:39 GMT
>>in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: 
>>
>>> *YES*!  :-)  IAWTP
>>
>>One socking troll praising an anonymous coward that's been busted 
>>making up stories and lifting things out of context more times than I 
>>can bother counting isn't exactly what you'd call a reliable source of 
>>information. And, amusing, you're well aware of this, yet you'll 
>>support anyone else who slimes those you have a problem with or that 
>>you think can distract others from knowing what you actually are. More 
>>importantly, how dangerous you are to others privacy. You aren't 
>>fooling anybody.
>
>Poor Dusty :O{

Pitying look directed at Dusty, momentarily contemplates the injustice,
half heartedly chases a leaf.<and cut> <Awaits Academy Award>

Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.

-- 
p-0.0-h the cat

Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat,
Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy,
Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath, 
the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme, 
the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll,
shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook, 
smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag, 
liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav,
punk ass dole whore troll, no nothing innumerate religious maniac, 
lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball.

NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist

Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery.
By Appointment to God Frank-Lin.

Signature integrity check
md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896

I mark any message from »Q« the troll as stinky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6122 — Re: [OT]David - questions about your post [Pooh, Dusty is the victim here!]

FromSpit the Cat <supersecret@IPaddress.invalid>
Date2019-03-16 20:56 +0000
SubjectRe: [OT]David - questions about your post [Pooh, Dusty is the victim here!]
Message-ID<vkoq8ethmcvggbq8vfer3ad7bg1r9e0pbu@4ax.com>
In reply to#6121
On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 20:53:52 +0000, "p-0''0-h the cat (coder)"
<super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote:

>On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 20:45:12 +0000, Shit the Cat
><supersecret@IPaddress.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 01:40:43 -0000 (UTC), Diesel <nobody@haph.org>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com>
>>>news:Q2WiE.129523$mm6.44899@fx10.fr7 Fri, 15 Mar 2019 22:54:39 GMT
>>>in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: 
>>>
>>>> *YES*!  :-)  IAWTP
>>>
>>>One socking troll praising an anonymous coward that's been busted 
>>>making up stories and lifting things out of context more times than I 
>>>can bother counting isn't exactly what you'd call a reliable source of 
>>>information. And, amusing, you're well aware of this, yet you'll 
>>>support anyone else who slimes those you have a problem with or that 
>>>you think can distract others from knowing what you actually are. More 
>>>importantly, how dangerous you are to others privacy. You aren't 
>>>fooling anybody.
>>
>>Poor Dusty :O{
>
>Pitying look directed at Dusty, momentarily contemplates the injustice,
>half heartedly chases a leaf.<and cut> <Awaits Academy Award>

Astonishing piece of work. Yunno Pooh, for a moment there I believed you
cared.

>Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.

-- 
Spit the cat
Duddit's only lives if you feed him through a straw

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6090 — Re: [OT]David - questions about your post

FromChar Jackson <none@none.invalid>
Date2019-03-10 15:12 -0500
SubjectRe: [OT]David - questions about your post
Message-ID<mira8e17r82jmgjm7ouc781rm7so9ig7rh@4ax.com>
In reply to#6088
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 02:13:49 -0000 (UTC), Diesel <nobody@haph.org>
wrote:

>Char Jackson <none@none.invalid>
>news:kdoi7e1n0q9detovaini9huc6rv0uk0n6n@4ax.com Fri, 01 Mar 2019
>16:47:02 GMT in alt.2600, wrote: 
>
>> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 10:22:49 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
>>>> He doesn't have the established track record that you have
>>>> David. 
>>>
>>>That's probably true.
>>>
>>>I've been 'huntin' bad guys' - bad guys like you, Dustin - since
>>>2006. 
>> 
>> You probably shouldn't bring that up. A dozen years of stalking
>> and not a single success so far makes you look like a loser and a
>> fool. 
>> 
>
>Well, he did get quite friendly with pcbutts for awhile. A known code 
>thief and liar, amongst other things David is okay with. pcbutts is the 
>one who turned him onto me when he asked if pcbutts knew anyone with 
>real skill. Yes, I know about that too David. [g] I've been saving it 
>for a special occasion. HAHAHAHAA.

David couldn't even figure out that pcbutts wasn't female. So much for
his claims of being an investigator. He's just a garden variety stalker
who lies at the drop of a hat. He's very good at one thing though: he
can take care of a bottle of booze. If only he could have taken the same
level of care when it came to his son. 

-- 
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:

<https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.computer.security


csiph-web