Groups > alt.comp.software.thunderbird > #56 > unrolled thread

msf files

Started by	frank_n_dale@yahoo.com
First post	2021-04-09 10:01 +0100
Last post	2021-04-15 05:29 +0000
Articles	11 — 7 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.comp.software.thunderbird

  msf files frank_n_dale@yahoo.com - 2021-04-09 10:01 +0100
    Re: msf files frank_n_dale@yahoo.com - 2021-04-09 22:08 +0100
      Re: msf files WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-09 17:29 -0400
    Re: msf files "C. St-Luc" <in@va.lid> - 2021-04-09 17:34 -0400
      Re: msf files WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-09 19:05 -0400
        Re: msf files "C. St-Luc" <in@va.lid> - 2021-04-09 19:08 -0400
          Re: msf files Henk de Jong <newsgroup@nospam-hsdejong.nl> - 2021-04-10 10:09 +0200
            Re: msf files Mint User <mint@aio3.org> - 2021-04-10 20:03 +0100
              Re: msf files Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2021-04-15 05:26 +0000
    Re: msf files "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-10 16:07 +0200
      Re: msf files Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2021-04-15 05:29 +0000

#56 — msf files

From	frank_n_dale@yahoo.com
Date	2021-04-09 10:01 +0100
Subject	msf files
Message-ID	<s4p55q$na7$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Hey Folks,

Thunderbird has started deleting my custom columns and replacing them 
with some nerving defaults. It seems the settings are hold in the 
msf-files.

How can I protect these files from abuse after customizing them?

Thanks a lot.

frank

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#62

From	frank_n_dale@yahoo.com
Date	2021-04-09 22:08 +0100
Message-ID	<s4qfp5$10p8$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#56

On 2021-04-09 13:42, WaltS48 wrote:
> What version of Thunderbird on what operating system?


Thanks, Walt.

Thunderbird 52.0, 32 bit; Win7 Pro SP1, 64 bit. No problems for years 
and years.

However, late March I tried Thunderbird 78, 64 bit. One day and I 
returned to the previous version. Since then occasional nuisances come 
up. In particular, my choice of columns seems to be accepted and then 
disappears.


frank

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#63

From	WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net>
Date	2021-04-09 17:29 -0400
Message-ID	<BG3cI.3618$w_4.2619@fx03.iad>
In reply to	#62

On 4/9/21 5:08 PM, frank_n_dale@yahoo.com wrote:
> On 2021-04-09 13:42, WaltS48 wrote:
>> What version of Thunderbird on what operating system?
>
>
> Thanks, Walt.
>
> Thunderbird 52.0, 32 bit; Win7 Pro SP1, 64 bit. No problems for years 
> and years.
>
> However, late March I tried Thunderbird 78, 64 bit. One day and I 
> returned to the previous version. Since then occasional nuisances come 
> up. In particular, my choice of columns seems to be accepted and then 
> disappears.
>
>
> frank

I see.

Try the suggestions by Good Guy.

I suspect the profile got corrupted by the downgrade.

-- 
OS: Fedora 33 Workstation - Gnome Desktop
https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/get-involved/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#64

From	"C. St-Luc" <in@va.lid>
Date	2021-04-09 17:34 -0400
Message-ID	<s4qh95$1j97$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#56

On 09-Apr.-2021 17:20, 😉 Good Guy 😉 wrote:
> . . .
> 
> Main message is in the second part of this post but it requires HTML 
> enabled in your thunderbird newsreader.  People using other newsreaders 
> will have serious problems reading this post.
> 
> . . .
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Plonk
Double Plonk
Adios Idiot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#66

From	WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net>
Date	2021-04-09 19:05 -0400
Message-ID	<J45cI.5649$Jd2.2884@fx39.iad>
In reply to	#64

On 4/9/21 5:34 PM, C. St-Luc wrote:
> On 09-Apr.-2021 17:20, 😉 Good Guy 😉 wrote:
>> . . .
>>
>> Main message is in the second part of this post but it requires HTML 
>> enabled in your thunderbird newsreader.  People using other 
>> newsreaders will have serious problems reading this post.
>>
>> . . .
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Plonk
> Double Plonk
> Adios Idiot.

While you are plonking it, why not help the OP?

Or aren't you intelligent enough.

-- 
OS: Fedora 33 Workstation - Gnome Desktop
https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/get-involved/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#67

From	"C. St-Luc" <in@va.lid>
Date	2021-04-09 19:08 -0400
Message-ID	<s4qmol$1l3i$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#66

On 09-Apr.-2021 19:05, WaltS48 wrote:
> On 4/9/21 5:34 PM, C. St-Luc wrote:
>> On 09-Apr.-2021 17:20, 😉 Good Guy 😉 wrote:
>>> . . .
>>>
>>> Main message is in the second part of this post but it requires HTML 
>>> enabled in your thunderbird newsreader.  People using other 
>>> newsreaders will have serious problems reading this post.
>>>
>>> . . .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Plonk
>> Double Plonk
>> Adios Idiot.
> 
> While you are plonking it, why not help the OP?
> 
> Or aren't you intelligent enough.
> 

Plonk you too.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#70

From	Henk de Jong <newsgroup@nospam-hsdejong.nl>
Date	2021-04-10 10:09 +0200
Message-ID	<s4rmgk$a0q$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#67

>>> Plonk
>>> Double Plonk
>>> Adios Idiot.
>> Or aren't you intelligent enough.
> Plonk you too.

Ah, good to see!
It's business as usual in this new alt.comp.software.thunderbird 
newsgroup ;-)


-- 
With kind regards,
Henk de Jong

7 Sisters Restaurant
https://www.7sistersrestaurant.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#76

From	Mint User <mint@aio3.org>
Date	2021-04-10 20:03 +0100
Message-ID	<s4ssq8$1igm$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#70

I use a filter for one serial spammer and now I don't have to plonk 
anybody :).  Why can't everybody do that?

Sorry I don't have a solution but a filter might be very useful here.

On 10/04/2021 09:09, Henk de Jong wrote:
>>>> Plonk
>>>> Double Plonk
>>>> Adios Idiot.
>>> Or aren't you intelligent enough.
>> Plonk you too.
> 
> Ah, good to see!
> It's business as usual in this new alt.comp.software.thunderbird 
> newsgroup ;-)
> 
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#121

From	Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>
Date	2021-04-15 05:26 +0000
Message-ID	<s58ipk$2br5$10@neodome.net>
In reply to	#76

😉 Good Guy 😉 <Hello.World@example.com> writes:

>   %   X   I   A   X   f   D   z   !   !
>   j   g   h   h   5   S   4   u   ;   A
>   s   >   k   S   `   H   t   T   .   h
>   f   r   %   N   V   B   C   5   /   q
>   m   w   ,   $   =   !   i   q   A   I
>   (   Z   v   n   t   e   k   t   ^   0
>   p   m   m   7   9   u   b   :   3   q
>   1   |   g   G   R   y   3   g   6   `
>   \   $   4   b   `   ,   z   5   W   o
>   U   L   U   |   "   }   +   s   i   E
>   <   P   ^   M   9   *   q   O   <   y
>   R   $   _   {   R   l   Z   +   T   .
>   y   N   a   B   =   c   H   h   F   S
>   n   >   |   o   E   -   C   d   J   W
>   8   K   v   \   =   Q   k   W   K   3
>   D   !   ?   [   J   k   l   =   1   T
>   `   )   *   g   +   5   &   n   W   E
>   I   s   _   {   s   N   U   &   &   i
>   u   n   >   3   /   n   |   A   E   X

Is it supposed to be some kind of cypher?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72

From	"s\|b" <me@privacy.invalid>
Date	2021-04-10 16:07 +0200
Message-ID	<iddpojFha4qU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#56

On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 22:20:36 +0100, ? Good Guy ? wrote:

> mail-complaints-to="abuse@mixmin.net"

-- 
s|b

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#122

From	Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>
Date	2021-04-15 05:29 +0000
Message-ID	<s58ivc$2br5$11@neodome.net>
In reply to	#72

"s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> writes:

> On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 22:20:36 +0100, ? Good Guy ? wrote:
>
>> mail-complaints-to="abuse@mixmin.net"

Not sure if that's gonna work.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

csiph-web

msf files

Contents

#56 — msf files

#62

#63

#64

#66

#67

#70

#76

#121

#72

#122