Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.comp.software.seamonkey

alt.comp.software.seamonkey

8626 articles, 1041 threads (numbers 1 – 8626) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
Purge *ALL* CSS from an HTML document (15 replies — unroll) Richard Owlett <rowlett@access.net> 2026-01-29 08:40 -0600
   → Re: Purge *ALL* CSS from an HTML document "David E. Ross" <nobody@nowhere.invalid> 2026-01-29 08:09 -0800
     → Re: Purge *ALL* CSS from an HTML document Richard Owlett <rowlett@access.net> 2026-01-29 12:08 -0600
   → Re: Purge *ALL* CSS from an HTML document Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-29 20:08 +0100
     → Re: Purge *ALL* CSS from an HTML document Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-29 20:13 +0100
       → Re: Purge *ALL* CSS from an HTML document Richard Owlett <rowlett@access.net> 2026-01-29 15:33 -0600
         → Re: Purge *ALL* CSS from an HTML document Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> 2026-02-10 04:10 -0400
           → Re: Purge *ALL* CSS from an HTML document Richard Owlett <rowlett@access.net> 2026-02-10 07:42 -0600
             → Re: Purge *ALL* CSS from an HTML document "Paul B. Gallagher" <mozilla@pbg-translations.com> 2026-02-10 23:07 -0500
               → Re: Purge *ALL* CSS from an HTML document Richard Owlett <rowlett@access.net> 2026-02-11 09:27 -0600
                 → Re: Purge *ALL* CSS from an HTML document Dirk Fieldhouse <surname@gmx.net.plusremovethisandtherest.invalid> 2026-02-12 14:38 +0000
                 → Re: Purge *ALL* CSS from an HTML document Richard Owlett <rowlett@access.net> 2026-02-13 08:29 -0600
                 → Re: Purge *ALL* CSS from an HTML document Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-02-13 16:50 +0100
                 → Re: Purge *ALL* CSS from an HTML document Richard Owlett <rowlett@access.net> 2026-02-14 05:04 -0600
                 → Re: Purge *ALL* CSS from an HTML document Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-02-16 18:28 +0100
         → Re: Purge *ALL* CSS from an HTML document Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> 2026-03-02 08:46 +0000
 
Standalone editor for Seamonkey bookmarks (4 replies — unroll) Richard Owlett <rowlett@access.net> 2026-02-21 09:47 -0600
   → Re: Standalone editor for Seamonkey bookmarks Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-02-21 19:17 +0100
   → Re: Standalone editor for Seamonkey bookmarks Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-02-22 20:38 +1100
     → Re: Standalone editor for Seamonkey bookmarks Richard Owlett <rowlett@access.net> 2026-02-22 04:18 -0600
       → Re: Standalone editor for Seamonkey bookmarks Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-02-22 21:39 +1100
 
Open containing folder? (1 reply — unroll) Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-02-18 16:09 +0000
   → Re: Open containing folder? Fixed. Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-02-18 17:00 +0000
 
Seamonkey Automatically Updating (2 replies — unroll) Ed Novak <aviation@tiac.net> 2026-02-11 08:10 -0500
   → Re: Seamonkey Automatically Updating "Jota.Ce" <josecss.es@gmail.com> 2026-02-11 14:22 +0100
     → Re: Seamonkey Automatically Updating Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> 2026-02-12 16:40 -0800
 
Prefbar for current SM? (11 replies — unroll) "Andi B." <andi.b@gmx.net> 2026-01-24 13:33 +0100
   → Re: Prefbar for current SM? "David E. Ross" <nobody@nowhere.invalid> 2026-01-24 08:59 -0800
     → Re: Prefbar for current SM? "Andi B." <andi.b@gmx.net> 2026-01-25 12:05 +0100
   → Re: Prefbar for current SM? David H Durgee <dhdurgee@privacy.net> 2026-01-24 12:31 -0700
     → Re: Prefbar for current SM? NFN Smith <worldoff9908@gmail.com> 2026-01-26 12:30 -0700
       → Re: Prefbar for current SM? "Andi B." <andi.b@gmx.net> 2026-01-29 12:49 +0100
         → Re: Prefbar for current SM? Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-29 17:26 +0100
           → Re: Prefbar for current SM? "Andi B." <andi.b@gmx.net> 2026-01-30 12:49 +0100
           → Re: Prefbar for current SM? alexyu <alexyu@postpro.net> 2026-01-30 19:40 -0300
   → Re: Prefbar for current SM? Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> 2026-01-24 16:19 -0800
     → Re: Prefbar for current SM? "Andi B." <andi.b@gmx.net> 2026-01-25 12:04 +0100
       → Re: Prefbar for current SM? Dirk Fieldhouse <surname@gmx.net.plusremovethisandtherest.invalid> 2026-01-25 13:00 +0000
 
Re: 2.53.23 is out ... but there's no calendar (11 replies — unroll) "sean.nathan.bean" <seannnaz+eternal@gmail.com> 2026-01-10 13:05 -0700
   → Re: 2.53.23 is out ... but there's no calendar frg <frgrahl@gmx.net> 2026-01-10 23:14 +0100
     → Re: 2.53.23 is out ... but there's no calendar "sean.nathan.bean" <seannnaz+eternal@gmail.com> 2026-01-11 14:50 -0700
       → Re: 2.53.23 is out ... but there's no calendar "Paul B. Gallagher" <mozilla@pbg-translations.com> 2026-01-11 18:18 -0500
   → Re: 2.53.23 is out ... but there's no calendar Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-01-11 18:41 +1100
     → Re: 2.53.23 is out ... but there's no calendar "sean.nathan.bean" <seannnaz+eternal@gmail.com> 2026-01-11 14:51 -0700
     → Re: 2.53.23 is out ... but there's no calendar "sean.nathan.bean" <seannnaz+eternal@gmail.com> 2026-01-11 14:58 -0700
       → Re: 2.53.23 is out ... but there's no calendar Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-01-12 20:17 +1100
         → Re: 2.53.23 is out ... but there's no calendar Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> 2026-01-13 11:30 +0000
           → Re: 2.53.23 is out ... but there's no calendar "sean.nathan.bean" <seannnaz+eternal@gmail.com> 2026-01-13 10:20 -0700
             → Re: 2.53.23 is out ... but there's no calendar frg <frgrahl@gmx.net> 2026-01-13 21:50 +0100
               → SOLVED Re: 2.53.23 is out ... but there's no calendar "sean.nathan.bean" <seannnaz+eternal@gmail.com> 2026-01-28 14:25 -0700
 
SeaMonkey viable for occasional podcast reception? (2 replies — unroll) Richard Owlett <rowlett@access.net> 2026-01-24 06:20 -0600
   → Re: SeaMonkey viable for occasional podcast reception? "David E. Ross" <nobody@nowhere.invalid> 2026-01-24 08:55 -0800
   → Re: SeaMonkey viable for occasional podcast reception? Dirk Fieldhouse <surname@gmx.net.plusremovethisandtherest.invalid> 2026-01-25 13:25 +0000
 
Questions about using Ublock origin and NoScript on seamonkey (4 replies — unroll) Hank Rogers <hank@nospam.invalid> 2026-01-13 16:06 -0600
   → Re: Questions about using Ublock origin and NoScript on seamonkey Paul in Houston TX <Paul@Houston.Texas> 2026-01-13 19:56 -0600
     → Re: Questions about using Ublock origin and NoScript on seamonkey Hank Rogers <hank@nospam.invalid> 2026-01-13 20:28 -0600
       → Re: Questions about using Ublock origin and NoScript on seamonkey Paul in Houston TX <Paul@Houston.Texas> 2026-01-13 22:05 -0600
     → Re: Questions about using Ublock origin and NoScript on seamonkey Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> 2026-01-15 18:55 -0600
 
The bold text on new messages (linux) (5 replies — unroll) Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-01-09 13:21 +0000
   → Re: The bold text on new messages (linux) Barryedwin1 <mrbarryedw.20@aussiebroadband.com.au> 2026-01-12 15:33 +0800
     → Re: The bold text on new messages (linux)Postscript Barryedwin1 <mrbarryedw.20@aussiebroadband.com.au> 2026-01-12 15:49 +0800
   → Re: The bold text on new messages (linux) Mark Bourne <nntp.mbourne@spamgourmet.com> 2026-01-13 20:31 +0000
     → Re: The bold text on new messages (linux) Barryedwin1 <mrbarryedw.20@aussiebroadband.com.au> 2026-01-14 09:49 +0800
       → Re: The bold text on new messages (linux) Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> 2026-01-14 10:27 +0000
 
Another "security" feature that SM can't handle (16 replies — unroll) "Paul B. Gallagher" <mozilla@pbg-translations.com> 2026-01-08 00:13 -0500
   → Re: Another "security" feature that SM can't handle Brian Schrimpp <schrimppb@no-spam.invalid> 2026-01-08 09:45 +0100
     → Re: Another "security" feature that SM can't handle "Paul B. Gallagher" <mozilla@pbg-translations.com> 2026-01-08 10:40 -0500
       → Re: Another "security" feature that SM can't handle Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-08 17:07 +0100
         → Re: Another "security" feature that SM can't handle Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-01-09 22:01 +1100
         → Re: Another "security" feature that SM can't handle Dirk Fieldhouse <surname@gmx.net.plusremovethisandtherest.invalid> 2026-01-09 11:09 +0000
       → Re: Another "security" feature that SM can't handle Brian Schrimpp <schrimppb@no-spam.invalid> 2026-01-10 09:48 +0100
         → Re: Another "security" feature that SM can't handle "Paul B. Gallagher" <mozilla@pbg-translations.com> 2026-01-10 15:04 -0500
           → Re: Another "security" feature that SM can't handle Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-01-11 18:35 +1100
           → Re: Another "security" feature that SM can't handle Brian Schrimpp <schrimppb@no-spam.invalid> 2026-01-11 09:44 +0100
             → Re: Another "security" feature that SM can't handle "Paul B. Gallagher" <mozilla@pbg-translations.com> 2026-01-11 12:45 -0500
               → Re: Another "security" feature that SM can't handle Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-01-12 20:05 +1100
                 → Re: Another "security" feature that SM can't handle ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2026-01-13 01:34 +0000
                 → Re: Another "security" feature that SM can't handle Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-13 02:39 +0100
                 → Re: Another "security" feature that SM can't handle ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2026-01-14 03:42 +0000
                 → Re: Another "security" feature that SM can't handle Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-01-14 19:27 +1100
   → Re: Another "security" feature that SM can't handle ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2026-01-09 07:55 +0000
 
MDN vs. CSS Zen Garden (2 replies — unroll) Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-13 02:12 +0100
   → Re: MDN vs. CSS Zen Garden Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-13 02:25 +0100
   → Re: MDN vs. CSS Zen Garden Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> 2026-01-13 11:19 +0000
 
Ugly eycancer broken web fonts (5 replies — unroll) Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-12 20:57 +0100
   → Re: Ugly eycancer broken web fonts "David E. Ross" <nobody@nowhere.invalid> 2026-01-12 17:56 -0800
     → Re: Ugly eycancer broken web fonts Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-13 03:32 +0100
       → Re: Ugly eycancer broken web fonts Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-13 03:53 +0100
   → Re: Ugly eycancer broken web fonts - FIXED! (WORKAROUND) Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-13 05:05 +0100
     → Re: Ugly eycancer broken web fonts - FIXED! (WORKAROUND) frg <frgrahl@gmx.net> 2026-01-13 10:42 +0100
 
2.53.23 is out (32 replies — unroll) frg <frgrahl@gmx.net> 2025-12-31 14:07 +0100
   → Re: 2.53.23 is out "Jota.Ce" <josecss.es@gmail.com> 2025-12-31 20:00 +0100
   → Re: 2.53.23 is out "David E. Ross" <nobody@nowhere.invalid> 2025-12-31 11:20 -0800
     → Re: 2.53.23 is out Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> 2026-01-02 02:18 +0000
       → Re: 2.53.23 is out Paul Bergsagel <pbergsagel@shaw.ca> 2026-01-02 19:57 -0600
         → Re: 2.53.23 is out Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> 2026-01-03 06:09 +0000
           → Re: 2.53.23 is out Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-01-03 19:28 +1100
             → Re: 2.53.23 is out Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> 2026-01-03 22:07 +0000
               → Re: 2.53.23 is out Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-03 23:24 +0100
               → Re: 2.53.23 is out "Paul B. Gallagher" <mozilla@pbg-translations.com> 2026-01-03 23:02 -0500
                 → Re: 2.53.23 is out Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> 2026-01-04 04:39 +0000
                 → Re: 2.53.23 is out frg <frgrahl@gmx.net> 2026-01-04 12:56 +0100
                 → uBO ext. (was Re: 2.53.23 is out) ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2026-01-04 19:12 +0000
                 → Re: 2.53.23 is out Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> 2026-01-04 13:36 -0600
                 → Re: 2.53.23 is out Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> 2026-01-04 19:41 +0000
                 → Re: 2.53.23 is out Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> 2026-01-04 14:15 -0600
                 → Re: 2.53.23 is out R Daneel Olivaw <Danni@hyperspace.vogon.gov.invalid> 2026-01-05 09:58 +0100
                 → Re: 2.53.23 is out Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> 2026-01-10 10:30 +0000
                 → Re: 2.53.23 is out Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-04 23:13 +0100
                 → Re: 2.53.23 is out Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> 2026-01-04 16:37 -0600
                 → Re: 2.53.23 is out Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> 2026-01-05 05:57 +0000
                 → Re: 2.53.23 is out Hank Rogers <invalid@nospam.com> 2026-01-05 06:18 +0000
                 → Re: 2.53.23 is out Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> 2026-01-04 16:46 -0600
                 → Re: 2.53.23 is out Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-01-05 20:03 +1100
                 → Re: 2.53.23 is out Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-01-05 20:08 +1100
                 → Re: 2.53.23 is out Jordi Garcia Soler <jordialcoister@gmail.com> 2026-01-09 11:40 +0100
                 → Re: 2.53.23 is out Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-09 17:47 +0100
                 → Re: 2.53.23 is out Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> 2026-01-09 17:03 -0600
                 → Re: 2.53.23 is out Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> 2026-01-10 10:27 +0000
                 → Re: 2.53.23 is out Hank Rogers <hank@nospam.invalid> 2026-01-11 20:25 -0600
                 → Re: 2.53.23 is out Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> 2026-01-11 22:04 -0800
   → Re: 2.53.23 is out Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2025-12-31 22:15 +0100
   → Re: 2.53.23 is out ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2026-01-01 07:16 +0000
 
https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" (20 replies — unroll) ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2026-01-04 18:56 +0000
   → Re: https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-04 20:09 +0100
     → Re: https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" Dirk Fieldhouse <surname@gmx.net.plusremovethisandtherest.invalid> 2026-01-06 12:11 +0000
       → Re: https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-06 16:58 +0100
         → Re: https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2026-01-07 03:55 +0000
           → Re: https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-01-07 19:46 +1100
             → Re: https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2026-01-08 04:15 +0000
               → Re: https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-01-08 19:56 +1100
                 → Re: https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> 2026-01-08 10:52 +0000
                 → Re: https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-01-08 22:52 +1100
       → Re: https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2026-01-07 03:52 +0000
         → Re: https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> 2026-01-07 06:33 +0000
         → Re: https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" Dirk Fieldhouse <surname@gmx.net.plusremovethisandtherest.invalid> 2026-01-07 09:59 +0000
           → Re: https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" Barryedwin1 <mrbarryedw.20@aussiebroadband.com.au> 2026-01-07 20:16 +0800
             → Re: https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-01-08 19:59 +1100
               → Re: https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" Barryedwin1 <mrbarryedw.20@aussiebroadband.com.au> 2026-01-08 19:08 +0800
                 → Re: https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-01-08 22:58 +1100
           → Re: https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-07 17:49 +0100
         → Re: https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> 2026-01-07 16:56 +0000
           → Re: https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" "Nuno Silva (testing)" <nuno.silva@invalid.invalid> 2026-01-07 19:05 +0200
             → Re: https://phys.org gets stuck with "Security Verification -- Verifying that you are not a bot" Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> 2026-01-07 10:31 -0800
 
Is the SeaMonkey IRC channel working for anyone?? (15 replies — unroll) Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-01-01 19:09 +1100
   → Re: Is the SeaMonkey IRC channel working for anyone?? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> 2026-01-01 11:27 +0000
     → Re: Is the SeaMonkey IRC channel working for anyone?? Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-01-01 22:53 +1100
       → Re: Is the SeaMonkey IRC channel working for anyone?? Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-01-01 23:11 +1100
         → Re: Is the SeaMonkey IRC channel working for anyone?? frg <frgrahl@gmx.net> 2026-01-01 13:33 +0100
           → Re: Is the SeaMonkey IRC channel working for anyone?? Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-01-02 19:43 +1100
             → Re: Is the SeaMonkey IRC channel working for anyone?? Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-02 11:57 +0100
         → Re: Is the SeaMonkey IRC channel working for anyone?? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> 2026-01-01 12:43 +0000
           → Re: Is the SeaMonkey IRC channel working for anyone?? Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-01-02 19:48 +1100
             → Re: Is the SeaMonkey IRC channel working for anyone?? frg <frgrahl@gmx.net> 2026-01-02 11:06 +0100
               → Re: Is the SeaMonkey IRC channel working for anyone?? Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-01-03 19:30 +1100
   → Re: Is the SeaMonkey IRC channel working for anyone?? - ircs:// link hangs Seamonkey Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-02 10:59 +0100
     → Re: Is the SeaMonkey IRC channel working for anyone?? - ircs:// link hangs Seamonkey frg <frgrahl@gmx.net> 2026-01-02 11:05 +0100
       → Re: Is the SeaMonkey IRC channel working for anyone?? - ircs:// link hangs Seamonkey - SOLVED! Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-02 11:34 +0100
         → Re: Is the SeaMonkey IRC channel working for anyone?? - ircs:// link hangs Seamonkey - SOLVED! + FIXED Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-04 17:36 +0100
       → Re: Is the SeaMonkey IRC channel working for anyone?? - ircs:// link hangs Seamonkey Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2026-01-04 18:23 +0100
 
SeaMonkey Status Meeting - Sunday, 4th January 2026 frg <frgrahl@gmx.net> 2026-01-03 15:11 +0100
 
Does anyone have problems sending images in http://voice.google.com? ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2026-01-03 04:04 +0000
 
metager.de looks ugly with SeaMonkey 2.53.22 Beta (4 replies — unroll) mike <mike@example.invalid> 2025-09-24 22:52 +0200
   → Re: metager.de looks ugly with SeaMonkey 2.53.22 Beta mike <mike@example.invalid> 2025-10-10 08:04 +0200
     → Re: metager.de looks ugly with SeaMonkey 2.53.22 Beta frg <frgrahl@gmx.net> 2025-10-10 15:25 +0200
     → Re: metager.de looks ugly with SeaMonkey 2.53.22 Beta frg <frgrahl@gmx.net> 2025-10-10 15:25 +0200
   → Re: metager.de looks ugly with SeaMonkey 2.53.22 Beta mike <mike@example.invalid> 2025-12-31 15:50 +0100
 
Choose DNS option? (5 replies — unroll) kuato <invalide@invalid.invalid> 2025-12-19 11:10 -0700
   → Re: Choose DNS option? Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2025-12-19 19:29 +0100
     → Re: Choose DNS option? Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2025-12-22 13:58 +0100
   → Re: Choose DNS option? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> 2025-12-19 23:24 +0000
     → Re: Choose DNS option? kuato <invalide@invalid.invalid> 2025-12-26 23:49 -0700
       → Re: Choose DNS option? Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2025-12-27 08:04 +0100
 
Seamonkey and Enigmail (8 replies — unroll) A Man Without Clue <love.chaser@gmail.com> 2025-12-24 19:54 +0900
   → Re: Seamonkey and Enigmail Patrick Brunschwig <patrick@enigmail.net> 2025-12-24 14:19 +0100
     → Re: Seamonkey and Enigmail A Man Without Clue <love.chaser@gmail.com> 2025-12-24 23:20 +0900
       → Re: Seamonkey and Enigmail Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2025-12-24 15:33 +0100
         → Re: Seamonkey and Enigmail A Man Without Clue <love.chaser@gmail.com> 2025-12-24 23:49 +0900
           → Re: Seamonkey and Enigmail Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2025-12-24 16:06 +0100
             → Re: Seamonkey and Enigmail frg <frgrahl@gmx.net> 2025-12-24 16:16 +0100
               → Re: Seamonkey and Enigmail A Man Without Clue <love.chaser@gmail.com> 2025-12-25 08:54 +0900
   → Re: Seamonkey and Enigmail alexyu <alexyu@postpro.net> 2025-12-24 16:55 -0300
 
Marking Cross-posts as Read. Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2025-12-21 23:52 +1100
 
Should Extensions and Javascript be able to override webbrowser shortcuts? (1 reply — unroll) Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2025-12-19 16:25 +0100
   → Re: Should Extensions and Javascript be able to override webbrowser shortcuts? Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2025-12-19 16:45 +0100
 
Open PDFs from mail attachment (8 replies — unroll) Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2025-12-15 17:33 +0100
   → Re: Open PDFs from mail attachment Dirk Fieldhouse <surname@gmx.net.plusremovethisandtherest.invalid> 2025-12-19 11:11 +0000
   → Re: Open PDFs from mail attachment Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2025-12-19 23:11 +1100
     → Re: Open PDFs from mail attachment Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2025-12-19 14:34 +0100
       → Re: Open PDFs from mail attachment Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2025-12-19 14:47 +0100
   → Re: Open PDFs from mail attachment Richard Owlett <rowlett@access.net> 2025-12-19 08:22 -0600
     → Re: Open PDFs from mail attachment Richard Owlett <rowlett@access.net> 2025-12-19 08:33 -0600
     → Re: Open PDFs from mail attachment Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2025-12-19 15:38 +0100
       → Re: Open PDFs from mail attachment Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> 2025-12-19 15:41 +0100

← Newer ~Page 1 of ~21 (articles 8267–8479) Older →


csiph-web