Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.software.firefox > #18249 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-09-30 04:37 -0700 |
| Last post | 2026-09-30 09:10 -0700 |
| Articles | 6 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.comp.software.firefox
Does 157 disable any extensions? "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> - 2026-09-30 04:37 -0700
Re: Does 157 disable any extensions? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-30 13:55 +0100
Re: Does 157 disable any extensions? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2026-09-30 20:41 +0700
Re: Does 157 disable any extensions? "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2026-09-30 15:06 +0000
Re: Does 157 disable any extensions? "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> - 2026-09-30 09:03 -0700
Re: Does 157 disable any extensions? "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> - 2026-09-30 09:10 -0700
| From | "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-30 04:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Does 157 disable any extensions? |
| Message-ID | <119is9d$63n7$1@dont-email.me> |
Can any of you who have "updated" to 157 noticed if any of your extensions were disabled? When that happens to me, it's very frustrating to have to find kludges and alternatives to make things work the way it did before a major update like this one. -- John C. I filter crossposts, various trolls & dizum.com. Doing this makes this newsgroup easier to read & more on-topic. Take back the tech companies from India & industry from China.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-30 13:55 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ni4f63Ffd3mU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #18249 |
"John C." wrote: > Can any of you who have "updated" to 157 noticed if any of your > extensions were disabled? > > When that happens to me, it's very frustrating to have to find kludges > and alternatives to make things work the way it did before a major > update like this one. It's down to individual extensions to declare what range of versions they work with 157 hasn't shown up for me yet (just 156.0.1) You can use the add-on checker compatibility add-on <https://addons.thunderbird.net/en-GB/thunderbird/addon/addon-compatibility-check/?src=search>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-30 20:41 +0700 |
| Message-ID | <16m57yjfeivh0.1olrq26imbng5$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #18252 |
On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 13:55:31 +0100, Andy Burns wrote: > > It's down to individual extensions to declare what range of versions > they work with > > 157 hasn't shown up for me yet (just 156.0.1) > > You can use the add-on checker compatibility add-on > > <https://addons.thunderbird.net/en-GB/thunderbird/addon/addon-compatibility-check/?src=search> Or... if Mozilla have added the extension to their blacklist.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-30 15:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <119j8hs$ao2g$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #18255 |
JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> wrote: >On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 13:55:31 +0100, Andy Burns wrote: >>It's down to individual extensions to declare what range of versions >>they work with >>157 hasn't shown up for me yet (just 156.0.1) >>You can use the add-on checker compatibility add-on >><https://addons.thunderbird.net/en-GB/thunderbird/addon/addon-compatibility-check/?src=search> >Or... if Mozilla have added the extension to their blacklist. I was going to say... Whether an extension is offered through Mozilla or Mozilla is tracking its reputation is not related to a major cersion increment. There'd have to be a known incompatibility introduced because something an older extension relies upon has been deprecated.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-30 09:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <119jbs7$cljf$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #18252 |
On 26/09/30 05:55 AM, Andy Burns wrote: > "John C." wrote: > >> Can any of you who have "updated" to 157 noticed if any of your >> extensions were disabled? >> >> When that happens to me, it's very frustrating to have to find kludges >> and alternatives to make things work the way it did before a major >> update like this one. > > It's down to individual extensions to declare what range of versions > they work with > > 157 hasn't shown up for me yet (just 156.0.1) > > You can use the add-on checker compatibility add-on > > <https://addons.thunderbird.net/en-GB/thunderbird/addon/addon- > compatibility-check/?src=search> That's for TB, not FF though, right? -- John C. I filter crossposts, various trolls & dizum.com. Doing this makes this newsgroup easier to read & more on-topic. Take back the tech companies from India & industry from China.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-30 09:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <119jcad$cln1$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #18249 |
John C. wrote: > Can any of you who have "updated" to 157 noticed if any of your > extensions were disabled? > > When that happens to me, it's very frustrating to have to find kludges > and alternatives to make things work the way it did before a major > update like this one. Never mind. I went ahead with the update and none of my extensions were disabled. However, I truly do hate the rounded look of 157. Went into about:config and toggled browser.nova.enabled back to "false". -- John C. I filter crossposts, various trolls & dizum.com. Doing this makes this newsgroup easier to read & more on-topic. Take back the tech companies from India & industry from China.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | alt.comp.software.firefox
csiph-web