Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-11 > #18113 > unrolled thread
| Started by | T <T@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-03-31 10:47 -0700 |
| Last post | 2025-04-01 15:45 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.comp.os.windows-11
What is this IPv6 address? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-03-31 10:47 -0700
Re: What is this IPv6 address? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-03-31 19:29 +0100
Re: What is this IPv6 address? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-03-31 12:07 -0700
Re: What is this IPv6 address? Brian Gregory <void-invalid-dead-dontuse@email.invalid> - 2025-04-01 03:49 +0100
Re: What is this IPv6 address? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-04-01 15:45 +0200
| From | T <T@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-31 10:47 -0700 |
| Subject | What is this IPv6 address? |
| Message-ID | <vsekg3$ph1f$1@dont-email.me> |
Hi All, I know squat about IPv6. This is a list of available IPv6 address. "0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1", "fe80:0:0:0:" It look to me like the fe one is mangled, but I do not know. You see anything wrong with these two? Many thanks, -T
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-31 19:29 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <m50593F5p3bU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #18113 |
On 31/03/2025 18:47, T wrote: > > This is a list of available IPv6 address. > > "0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1", > "fe80:0:0:0:" > > It look to me like the fe one is mangled, but I > do not know. they're both expanded a bit more than they need to be ::1 is like 127.0.0.1, a loopback addr fe80::0 is equivalent to 169.254.0.0, it's link local, non routable, for when you can't get any other IP addr.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | T <T@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-31 12:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <vsep55$ph1g$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #18120 |
On 3/31/25 11:29 AM, Andy Burns wrote: > On 31/03/2025 18:47, T wrote: >> >> This is a list of available IPv6 address. >> >> "0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1", >> "fe80:0:0:0:" >> >> It look to me like the fe one is mangled, but I >> do not know. > > they're both expanded a bit more than they need to be > > ::1 is like 127.0.0.1, a loopback addr > > fe80::0 is equivalent to 169.254.0.0, it's link local, non routable, for > when you can't get any other IP addr. > Thank you!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brian Gregory <void-invalid-dead-dontuse@email.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-01 03:49 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <m512h0FacjpU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #18113 |
On 31/03/2025 18:47, T wrote: > "fe80:0:0:0:" That's invalid because it's incomplete. -- Brian Gregory (in England).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-04-01 15:45 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <n87tblxjnu.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #18136 |
On 2025-04-01 04:49, Brian Gregory wrote: > On 31/03/2025 18:47, T wrote: >> "fe80:0:0:0:" > > That's invalid because it's incomplete. > Apparently not: cer@Telcontar:~> host fe80:0:0:0: Host fe80:0:0:0: not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) cer@Telcontar:~> -- Cheers, Carlos.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | alt.comp.os.windows-11
csiph-web