Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #7876 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeremy Bentham <nobody@anemone.mooo.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-12 19:49 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-09-20 15:20 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 315 — 40 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Jeremy Bentham <nobody@anemone.mooo.com> - 2015-09-12 19:49 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> - 2015-09-12 19:15 +0100
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 chicagofan <me7@privacy.net> - 2015-09-12 15:08 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-12 15:54 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-12 23:03 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-09-19 16:07 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-19 13:51 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Bubba <Bub@ba> - 2015-09-13 15:14 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:46 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-13 11:49 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Jenny Telia <jnytelia@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 09:26 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-14 12:06 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2015-09-14 12:16 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2015-09-14 14:42 -0300
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 17:45 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-14 11:49 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-14 19:33 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-14 20:22 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2015-09-14 22:51 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2015-09-14 22:51 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-14 19:42 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 23:55 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-15 08:46 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-15 10:26 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 17:34 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-15 11:03 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 18:11 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2015-09-15 22:30 +0200
Re: chrisv loses argument, resorts to vandalism, snicker. Re: dizum coward's post deleted, unread "P.M." <pm@example.com> - 2015-09-18 01:16 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 13:13 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 18:15 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-15 20:08 -0400
Turdv is just retarded, so filter out this potty mouth villain. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:22 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-15 14:15 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-15 14:14 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-14 11:48 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Neil <neil@myplaceofwork.com> - 2015-09-13 15:32 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-13 18:54 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-14 11:50 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 17:56 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-14 21:15 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2015-09-14 20:26 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-14 20:42 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-14 20:43 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-15 06:14 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-15 10:27 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2015-09-15 14:45 -0300
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:36 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-16 07:59 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-16 05:39 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-16 14:12 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-16 23:36 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:34 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:34 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:28 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-14 20:40 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2015-09-14 21:55 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-15 10:30 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:40 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-16 09:51 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 18:28 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-16 11:46 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-16 23:37 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-17 07:32 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:40 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-18 13:10 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2015-09-16 12:51 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 19:56 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-16 15:13 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 20:17 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Caver1 <caver1@inthemud.org> - 2015-09-16 17:25 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 21:40 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Caver1 <caver1@inthemud.org> - 2015-09-16 17:45 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 22:18 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Caver1 <caver1@inthemud.org> - 2015-09-16 18:27 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 22:35 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2015-09-16 18:50 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-17 07:37 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 18:59 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 00:04 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 17:16 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 17:15 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-16 14:47 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-17 07:25 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:41 +0000
Chrisv is a worthless advocate. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-18 13:15 -0600
Re: Chrisv is a worthless advocate. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 19:30 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-18 13:14 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-16 13:24 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-18 13:12 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-16 23:38 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-17 06:05 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2015-09-17 03:57 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-17 13:33 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-17 07:47 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-17 08:05 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-17 10:44 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-17 17:28 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2015-09-17 13:00 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-17 15:09 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 19:09 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2015-09-17 19:02 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 02:19 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-18 09:21 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-18 07:08 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-18 09:25 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 08:15 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-18 10:52 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-18 11:04 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 22:06 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 11:06 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-18 09:22 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-18 10:47 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-21 03:20 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2015-09-21 03:16 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-21 20:59 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-21 19:06 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-22 09:53 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 10:23 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-21 21:09 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2015-09-18 12:30 -0300
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-18 10:45 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-18 10:32 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2015-09-18 13:30 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-18 15:50 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2015-09-18 13:41 -0700
There is no FOSS Culling Committee Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-22 01:40 -0500
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 06:34 -0700
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2015-09-22 10:34 -0300
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 06:44 -0700
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-22 08:54 -0500
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-22 09:35 -0700
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-22 18:39 -0600
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-23 09:56 -0400
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-23 12:25 -0600
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee Yrrah <Yrrah-acf@acf.invalid> - 2015-09-22 16:28 +0200
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-09-22 15:45 +0100
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2015-09-22 10:38 -0700
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-22 12:54 -0500
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2015-09-22 16:41 -0700
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-22 19:09 -0500
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2015-09-22 20:58 -0700
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-27 03:38 -0500
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-27 12:14 +0200
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-27 07:05 -0400
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-23 02:14 +0200
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-23 07:09 -0500
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-23 09:53 -0400
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-23 12:26 -0600
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2015-09-23 17:44 -0300
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-23 16:06 -0500
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-23 17:17 -0400
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-24 16:07 -0600
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-25 09:23 -0400
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-23 17:07 -0400
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-24 16:06 -0600
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-25 09:21 -0400
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-25 12:21 -0600
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-25 18:01 -0400
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2015-09-26 00:20 +0000
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-22 18:42 -0600
Re: There is no FOSS Culling Committee Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-22 18:56 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2015-09-28 17:33 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-18 07:25 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-18 10:54 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-17 10:17 -0700
Chris Ahlstrom is a lin-troll and hypocrite. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-18 13:17 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-17 07:43 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:49 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-18 13:17 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-17 07:29 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-21 03:07 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-21 10:10 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-21 11:58 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-21 20:41 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-21 13:41 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-21 22:45 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-21 14:06 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-21 16:46 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-22 09:41 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 05:41 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 06:35 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 05:50 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-22 09:59 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 09:53 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-21 14:49 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-21 23:14 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-22 18:43 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-21 17:12 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 23:15 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:40 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2015-09-13 19:56 +0100
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Anonymous <anonymous@foto.nl1.torservers.net> - 2015-09-14 04:46 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-14 10:49 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-14 11:52 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-14 12:05 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 14:05 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-14 17:37 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 18:07 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-14 20:50 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 21:51 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-15 11:01 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 11:16 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-14 21:18 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-14 20:52 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:44 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Anonymous <anonymous@foto.nl1.torservers.net> - 2015-09-14 20:11 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-14 17:41 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-15 09:52 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Jenny Telia <jnytelia@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 15:32 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-16 17:58 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Johnny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2015-09-12 20:07 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Bubba <Bub@ba> - 2015-09-13 14:16 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:48 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 22:28 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-13 00:33 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lehman <drlehman022@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 23:46 +0100
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-13 00:59 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2015-09-13 21:20 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 "Dr. John Grubor" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 20:08 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-12 22:48 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 03:56 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-13 10:38 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-13 10:42 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 13:26 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-13 11:37 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 14:02 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-14 10:02 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-14 16:50 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-14 11:53 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-14 09:18 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 09:34 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-14 12:10 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 19:12 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2015-09-14 13:01 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 20:04 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 13:14 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2015-09-14 14:19 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 21:26 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-15 00:35 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 22:44 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 16:03 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-15 01:16 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 23:25 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 16:51 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 23:53 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 23:57 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-15 10:00 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 12:12 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-15 14:27 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 12:35 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 07:42 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 12:50 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-15 11:17 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:19 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 10:00 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 09:58 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:18 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 17:03 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 00:22 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 17:34 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 00:47 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 18:07 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-14 21:00 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-15 08:48 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 10:01 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 16:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 14:29 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-16 10:20 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-16 10:37 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-16 12:51 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-16 23:31 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-17 07:13 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-17 10:37 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-26 14:30 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 21:01 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-26 14:51 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 22:03 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-09-16 18:23 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-16 23:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 11:42 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2015-09-16 12:39 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-16 15:15 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 20:21 +0000
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-21 02:55 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows8 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-21 10:08 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-20 17:37 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-20 15:39 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-14 13:25 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 11:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-13 11:39 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 14:46 -0400
Where are Micheal Glasser's quotes? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 13:56 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-13 12:24 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2015-09-13 00:09 +0100
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-13 01:11 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2015-09-13 00:16 +0100
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-12 22:59 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 21:00 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2015-09-13 21:28 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 20:59 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2015-09-13 21:12 +0200
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-14 11:42 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-22 19:00 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-23 09:51 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-23 12:22 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2015-09-23 17:46 -0300
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-24 16:04 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-09-12 16:49 -0400
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 21:02 -0600
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-12 22:54 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2015-09-13 14:29 -0500
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-13 13:18 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Euclides Zoto <euclides_zoto@optimum.net> - 2015-09-19 12:30 -0700
Re: Microsoft Forces Windows 10 Downloads Onto Windows 7 And Windows 8 Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> - 2015-09-20 15:20 -0700
Page 4 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 16 Next page →
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 18:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d5tqliFrtnoU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #8170 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:51:30 -0500, chrisv wrote: > mike wrote: > >>Desktop linux already has WAY too much CHOICE. >>How about a little STANDARDIZATION with a side of STABILITY. >>... >>We need ONE standard desktop linux so everybody can start on the same >>page. >>... >>It's not rocket science. All it takes is leadership and developers >>willing to follow the plan instead of forking off on their own. > > Another mental-midget who thinks that fewer choices will make Linux > appeal to more people. Another ignorant wannabe dictator who thinks > that committees and five-year plans can beat the free market. And an even smaller mental-midget that doesn't understand how sales and marketing works. And 'free market' doesn't mean 'free' in any sense you think you understand. Face it, you have no business acumen whatsoever and even less marketing/sales skills. The tech doesn't sell the product! -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 11:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D21F06FF.5BBDD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #8185 |
On 9/16/15, 11:28 AM, in article d5tqliFrtnoU2@mid.individual.net, "Lloyd Parsons" <lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:51:30 -0500, chrisv wrote: > >> mike wrote: >> >>> Desktop linux already has WAY too much CHOICE. >>> How about a little STANDARDIZATION with a side of STABILITY. >>> ... >>> We need ONE standard desktop linux so everybody can start on the same >>> page. >>> ... >>> It's not rocket science. All it takes is leadership and developers >>> willing to follow the plan instead of forking off on their own. >> >> Another mental-midget who thinks that fewer choices will make Linux >> appeal to more people. Another ignorant wannabe dictator who thinks >> that committees and five-year plans can beat the free market. > > And an even smaller mental-midget that doesn't understand how sales and > marketing works. And 'free market' doesn't mean 'free' in any sense you > think you understand. Face it, you have no business acumen whatsoever and > even less marketing/sales skills. > > The tech doesn't sell the product! A "free" market does not mean any product you put out, no matter how good or bad, or how appealing or not, will do as well as others. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Bad Bob <BigBadBob-at-mrp3-dot-com@testing.local> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 23:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <YbGdnfkM05FewmfInZ2dnUU7-Q-dnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #8185 |
On 09/16/15 11:28, Lloyd Parsons so wittily quipped: > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:51:30 -0500, chrisv wrote: > >> mike wrote: >> >>> Desktop linux already has WAY too much CHOICE. >>> How about a little STANDARDIZATION with a side of STABILITY. >>> ... >>> We need ONE standard desktop linux so everybody can start on the same >>> page. >>> ... >>> It's not rocket science. All it takes is leadership and developers >>> willing to follow the plan instead of forking off on their own. >> >> Another mental-midget who thinks that fewer choices will make Linux >> appeal to more people. Another ignorant wannabe dictator who thinks >> that committees and five-year plans can beat the free market. > > And an even smaller mental-midget that doesn't understand how sales and > marketing works. And 'free market' doesn't mean 'free' in any sense you > think you understand. Face it, you have no business acumen whatsoever and > even less marketing/sales skills. > > The tech doesn't sell the product! unfortunately, all too often the case.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 07:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <7iclva1cjdds4dkeicpk5irgcipv0qs2vt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #8224 |
> Lying Lloyd Parsons wrote: >> >> (fact-free, baseless, pulled-from-his-ass, personal attacks snipped). "Lloyd", I am clearly out of your league. -- "According to the COLA loons (buying an OS-free PC) is IMPOSSIBLE because of the monopoly." - Hadron Quark, lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 12:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d5vqleFbvdqU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #8235 |
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 07:32:17 -0500, chrisv wrote: >> Lying Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>> >>> (fact-free, baseless, pulled-from-his-ass, personal attacks snipped). > > "Lloyd", I am clearly out of your league. Correct, you are so much below almost everyone's league that it is amazing you can see 'there' from where you are. BTW, if I was killfiled and hadn't read every word you wouldn't know what the content was. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 13:10 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <XNOdnb3y_Y9b_GHInZ2dnUU7-W2dnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #8235 |
On 09/17/15 06:32, chrisv wrote: >> Lying Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>> >>> (fact-free, baseless, pulled-from-his-ass, personal attacks snipped). > > "Lloyd", I am clearly out of your league. > <snicker> You are not even in his league... your league is the janitor league. -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mike <ham789@netzero.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 12:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mtch42$n75$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #8170 |
On 9/16/2015 7:51 AM, chrisv wrote: > mike wrote: > >> Desktop linux already has WAY too much CHOICE. >> How about a little STANDARDIZATION with a side of STABILITY. >> ... >> We need ONE standard desktop linux so everybody can start on the same >> page. >> ... >> It's not rocket science. All it takes is leadership and developers >> willing to follow the plan instead of forking off on their own. > > Another mental-midget who thinks that fewer choices will make Linux > appeal to more people. Another ignorant wannabe dictator who thinks > that committees and five-year plans can beat the free market. > You're not paying attention. Too much effort on denigration and not enough on making linux easier for the newbie. I never advocated fewer choices. I advocate ORGANIZED CHOICE with a common starting point and STRUCTURED enhancements via GUI, click here to install this, and a COMMON repository that's always evaluated and self-consistent. PLUS full support for the current chaos for those who think they are gurus. Nobody has to give up ANYTHING. Just add an option to the install menu, "Make it as hard as possible" and the gurus will be unaffected.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 19:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d5tvr8FtckfU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #8194 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 12:51:03 -0700, mike wrote: > On 9/16/2015 7:51 AM, chrisv wrote: >> mike wrote: >> >>> Desktop linux already has WAY too much CHOICE. >>> How about a little STANDARDIZATION with a side of STABILITY. >>> ... >>> We need ONE standard desktop linux so everybody can start on the same >>> page. >>> ... >>> It's not rocket science. All it takes is leadership and developers >>> willing to follow the plan instead of forking off on their own. >> >> Another mental-midget who thinks that fewer choices will make Linux >> appeal to more people. Another ignorant wannabe dictator who thinks >> that committees and five-year plans can beat the free market. >> > You're not paying attention. Too much effort on denigration and not > enough on making linux easier for the newbie. > > I never advocated fewer choices. > I advocate ORGANIZED CHOICE with a common starting point and STRUCTURED > enhancements via GUI, click here to install this, > and a COMMON repository that's always evaluated and self-consistent. > PLUS full support for the current chaos for those who think they are > gurus. > Nobody has to give up ANYTHING. > Just add an option to the install menu, "Make it as hard as possible" > and the gurus will be unaffected. That's an interesting approach. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 15:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <unijvatr179a4fa0ct22u3ufqijmg7pko8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #8194 |
mike wrote: >I never advocated fewer choices. "Desktop linux already has WAY too much CHOICE." - "mike" > (remainder snipped, unread) I know. You think that you know better than everyone else. If only you were dictator, and could allocate resources, the world would be better-off. You would eliminate "wasteful" and "redundant" work on competing ideas on how to do things best. You would disallow the offering of anything but one STANDARD Linux, for the good of us all. Maybe you should consider starting your own communist "utopia" somewhere, comrad. -- "They get lost when they see 500 x distros v Windows v Apple." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 20:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d5u12gFtiqpU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #8197 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:13:14 -0500, chrisv wrote: > mike wrote: > >>I never advocated fewer choices. > > "Desktop linux already has WAY too much CHOICE." - "mike" > >> (remainder snipped, unread) > > I know. You think that you know better than everyone else. If only you > were dictator, and could allocate resources, the world would be > better-off. You would eliminate "wasteful" and "redundant" work on > competing ideas on how to do things best. You would disallow the > offering of anything but one STANDARD Linux, for the good of us all. > > Maybe you should consider starting your own communist "utopia" > somewhere, comrad. Time after time, post after post, you demonstrate that you are happy with the hobbyist/developer open and free model for desktop linux. And I have no problem with that. It gathers a solid 1.5% of the market and is fringe enough to fill that tiniest of tech niches. But then don't complain when linux desktop goes nowhere in the commercial/ consumer world. That's because the things you believe important about linux desktop are exactly what prevents that from ever changing. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Caver1 <caver1@inthemud.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 17:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtcmla$e1a$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #8199 |
On 09/16/2015 04:17 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:13:14 -0500, chrisv wrote: > >> mike wrote: >> >>> I never advocated fewer choices. >> >> "Desktop linux already has WAY too much CHOICE." - "mike" >> >>> (remainder snipped, unread) >> >> I know. You think that you know better than everyone else. If only you >> were dictator, and could allocate resources, the world would be >> better-off. You would eliminate "wasteful" and "redundant" work on >> competing ideas on how to do things best. You would disallow the >> offering of anything but one STANDARD Linux, for the good of us all. >> >> Maybe you should consider starting your own communist "utopia" >> somewhere, comrad. > > Time after time, post after post, you demonstrate that you are happy with > the hobbyist/developer open and free model for desktop linux. And I have > no problem with that. It gathers a solid 1.5% of the market and is > fringe enough to fill that tiniest of tech niches. > > But then don't complain when linux desktop goes nowhere in the commercial/ > consumer world. That's because the things you believe important about > linux desktop are exactly what prevents that from ever changing. > > > > Linux has taken over some of the commercial world and is growing rapidly in the rest. As different gov'ts and businesses switch to Linux then the consumer world will grow. http://thevarguy.com/open-source-application-software-companies/091515/ubuntu-linux-based-open-source-os-runs-42-percent-dell-pc http://tinyurl.com/pr2d3bx India is switching over also. -- Caver1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 21:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d5u5v6Fcn5U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #8204 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:25:47 -0400, Caver1 wrote: > On 09/16/2015 04:17 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:13:14 -0500, chrisv wrote: >> >>> mike wrote: >>> >>>> I never advocated fewer choices. >>> >>> "Desktop linux already has WAY too much CHOICE." - "mike" >>> >>>> (remainder snipped, unread) >>> >>> I know. You think that you know better than everyone else. If only >>> you were dictator, and could allocate resources, the world would be >>> better-off. You would eliminate "wasteful" and "redundant" work on >>> competing ideas on how to do things best. You would disallow the >>> offering of anything but one STANDARD Linux, for the good of us all. >>> >>> Maybe you should consider starting your own communist "utopia" >>> somewhere, comrad. >> >> Time after time, post after post, you demonstrate that you are happy >> with the hobbyist/developer open and free model for desktop linux. And >> I have no problem with that. It gathers a solid 1.5% of the market and >> is fringe enough to fill that tiniest of tech niches. >> >> But then don't complain when linux desktop goes nowhere in the >> commercial/ >> consumer world. That's because the things you believe important about >> linux desktop are exactly what prevents that from ever changing. >> >> >> >> >> > Linux has taken over some of the commercial world and is growing rapidly > in the rest. Let's correct that a bit. It has been taken in by some companies for specific purposes but very few have switched to linux on the desktop in total. > As different gov'ts and businesses switch to Linux then the consumer > world will grow. > That's been the story for 20+ years now. No indication that it is more than a pipe dream. > http://thevarguy.com/open-source-application-software-companies/091515/ ubuntu-linux-based-open-source-os-runs-42-percent-dell-pc > > http://tinyurl.com/pr2d3bx > > India is switching over also. The story is nice, another 'this is the year of linux' that appear every year for almost 20 years now. When the dust settles this time next year, there will be another story similar to it. But the 1.5% of marketshare will remain the same. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Caver1 <caver1@inthemud.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 17:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtcnqo$i1g$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #8205 |
On 09/16/2015 05:40 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:25:47 -0400, Caver1 wrote: > >> On 09/16/2015 04:17 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:13:14 -0500, chrisv wrote: >>> >>>> mike wrote: >>>> >>>>> I never advocated fewer choices. >>>> >>>> "Desktop linux already has WAY too much CHOICE." - "mike" >>>> >>>>> (remainder snipped, unread) >>>> >>>> I know. You think that you know better than everyone else. If only >>>> you were dictator, and could allocate resources, the world would be >>>> better-off. You would eliminate "wasteful" and "redundant" work on >>>> competing ideas on how to do things best. You would disallow the >>>> offering of anything but one STANDARD Linux, for the good of us all. >>>> >>>> Maybe you should consider starting your own communist "utopia" >>>> somewhere, comrad. >>> >>> Time after time, post after post, you demonstrate that you are happy >>> with the hobbyist/developer open and free model for desktop linux. And >>> I have no problem with that. It gathers a solid 1.5% of the market and >>> is fringe enough to fill that tiniest of tech niches. >>> >>> But then don't complain when linux desktop goes nowhere in the >>> commercial/ >>> consumer world. That's because the things you believe important about >>> linux desktop are exactly what prevents that from ever changing. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Linux has taken over some of the commercial world and is growing rapidly >> in the rest. > > Let's correct that a bit. It has been taken in by some companies for > specific purposes but very few have switched to linux on the desktop in > total. No correction needed. >> As different gov'ts and businesses switch to Linux then the consumer >> world will grow. >> > That's been the story for 20+ years now. No indication that it is more > than a pipe dream. > > >> http://thevarguy.com/open-source-application-software-companies/091515/ > ubuntu-linux-based-open-source-os-runs-42-percent-dell-pc >> >> http://tinyurl.com/pr2d3bx >> >> India is switching over also. > > The story is nice, another 'this is the year of linux' that appear every > year for almost 20 years now. When the dust settles this time next year, > there will be another story similar to it. > > But the 1.5% of marketshare will remain the same. > > > Nobody said anything about a year. Just showing that Linux is growing in large chunks. Who care about market share. Most Linux distros aren't sold so are not part of the "market" By the way that is just two examples. -- Caver1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 22:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d5u85nFtm0U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #8206 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:45:45 -0400, Caver1 wrote: > On 09/16/2015 05:40 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:25:47 -0400, Caver1 wrote: >> >>> On 09/16/2015 04:17 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:13:14 -0500, chrisv wrote: >>>> >>>>> mike wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I never advocated fewer choices. >>>>> >>>>> "Desktop linux already has WAY too much CHOICE." - "mike" >>>>> >>>>>> (remainder snipped, unread) >>>>> >>>>> I know. You think that you know better than everyone else. If only >>>>> you were dictator, and could allocate resources, the world would be >>>>> better-off. You would eliminate "wasteful" and "redundant" work on >>>>> competing ideas on how to do things best. You would disallow the >>>>> offering of anything but one STANDARD Linux, for the good of us all. >>>>> >>>>> Maybe you should consider starting your own communist "utopia" >>>>> somewhere, comrad. >>>> >>>> Time after time, post after post, you demonstrate that you are happy >>>> with the hobbyist/developer open and free model for desktop linux. >>>> And I have no problem with that. It gathers a solid 1.5% of the >>>> market and is fringe enough to fill that tiniest of tech niches. >>>> >>>> But then don't complain when linux desktop goes nowhere in the >>>> commercial/ >>>> consumer world. That's because the things you believe important >>>> about linux desktop are exactly what prevents that from ever >>>> changing. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Linux has taken over some of the commercial world and is growing >>> rapidly in the rest. >> >> Let's correct that a bit. It has been taken in by some companies for >> specific purposes but very few have switched to linux on the desktop in >> total. > > No correction needed. > >>> As different gov'ts and businesses switch to Linux then the consumer >>> world will grow. >>> >> That's been the story for 20+ years now. No indication that it is more >> than a pipe dream. >> >> >>> http://thevarguy.com/open-source-application-software- companies/091515/ >> ubuntu-linux-based-open-source-os-runs-42-percent-dell-pc >>> >>> http://tinyurl.com/pr2d3bx >>> >>> India is switching over also. >> >> The story is nice, another 'this is the year of linux' that appear >> every year for almost 20 years now. When the dust settles this time >> next year, >> there will be another story similar to it. >> >> But the 1.5% of marketshare will remain the same. >> >> >> >> > Nobody said anything about a year. Just showing that Linux is growing in > large chunks. > Who care about market share. Most Linux distros aren't sold so are not > part of the "market" > By the way that is just two examples. Except for the fact that it isn't growing by even small chunks, you are absolutely correct. And I'd say give it 5 years and it might just make 1.55% at the rate it is growing now. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Caver1 <caver1@inthemud.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 18:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtcq8i$uan$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #8210 |
On 09/16/2015 06:18 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:45:45 -0400, Caver1 wrote: > >> On 09/16/2015 05:40 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:25:47 -0400, Caver1 wrote: >>> >>>> On 09/16/2015 04:17 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:13:14 -0500, chrisv wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> mike wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I never advocated fewer choices. >>>>>> >>>>>> "Desktop linux already has WAY too much CHOICE." - "mike" >>>>>> >>>>>>> (remainder snipped, unread) >>>>>> >>>>>> I know. You think that you know better than everyone else. If only >>>>>> you were dictator, and could allocate resources, the world would be >>>>>> better-off. You would eliminate "wasteful" and "redundant" work on >>>>>> competing ideas on how to do things best. You would disallow the >>>>>> offering of anything but one STANDARD Linux, for the good of us all. >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe you should consider starting your own communist "utopia" >>>>>> somewhere, comrad. >>>>> >>>>> Time after time, post after post, you demonstrate that you are happy >>>>> with the hobbyist/developer open and free model for desktop linux. >>>>> And I have no problem with that. It gathers a solid 1.5% of the >>>>> market and is fringe enough to fill that tiniest of tech niches. >>>>> >>>>> But then don't complain when linux desktop goes nowhere in the >>>>> commercial/ >>>>> consumer world. That's because the things you believe important >>>>> about linux desktop are exactly what prevents that from ever >>>>> changing. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Linux has taken over some of the commercial world and is growing >>>> rapidly in the rest. >>> >>> Let's correct that a bit. It has been taken in by some companies for >>> specific purposes but very few have switched to linux on the desktop in >>> total. >> >> No correction needed. >> >>>> As different gov'ts and businesses switch to Linux then the consumer >>>> world will grow. >>>> >>> That's been the story for 20+ years now. No indication that it is more >>> than a pipe dream. >>> >>> >>>> http://thevarguy.com/open-source-application-software- > companies/091515/ >>> ubuntu-linux-based-open-source-os-runs-42-percent-dell-pc >>>> >>>> http://tinyurl.com/pr2d3bx >>>> >>>> India is switching over also. >>> >>> The story is nice, another 'this is the year of linux' that appear >>> every year for almost 20 years now. When the dust settles this time >>> next year, >>> there will be another story similar to it. >>> >>> But the 1.5% of marketshare will remain the same. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Nobody said anything about a year. Just showing that Linux is growing in >> large chunks. >> Who care about market share. Most Linux distros aren't sold so are not >> part of the "market" >> By the way that is just two examples. > > Except for the fact that it isn't growing by even small chunks, you are > absolutely correct. And I'd say give it 5 years and it might just make > 1.55% at the rate it is growing now. > > > > When it grows at the rate of 20-25000 at one time I would say that is large chunks. -- Caver1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 22:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d5u95rFtm0U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #8211 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:27:17 -0400, Caver1 wrote: > On 09/16/2015 06:18 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:45:45 -0400, Caver1 wrote: >> >>> On 09/16/2015 05:40 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:25:47 -0400, Caver1 wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 09/16/2015 04:17 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:13:14 -0500, chrisv wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> mike wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I never advocated fewer choices. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Desktop linux already has WAY too much CHOICE." - "mike" >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (remainder snipped, unread) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I know. You think that you know better than everyone else. If >>>>>>> only you were dictator, and could allocate resources, the world >>>>>>> would be better-off. You would eliminate "wasteful" and >>>>>>> "redundant" work on competing ideas on how to do things best. You >>>>>>> would disallow the offering of anything but one STANDARD Linux, >>>>>>> for the good of us all. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe you should consider starting your own communist "utopia" >>>>>>> somewhere, comrad. >>>>>> >>>>>> Time after time, post after post, you demonstrate that you are >>>>>> happy with the hobbyist/developer open and free model for desktop >>>>>> linux. And I have no problem with that. It gathers a solid 1.5% of >>>>>> the market and is fringe enough to fill that tiniest of tech >>>>>> niches. >>>>>> >>>>>> But then don't complain when linux desktop goes nowhere in the >>>>>> commercial/ >>>>>> consumer world. That's because the things you believe important >>>>>> about linux desktop are exactly what prevents that from ever >>>>>> changing. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Linux has taken over some of the commercial world and is growing >>>>> rapidly in the rest. >>>> >>>> Let's correct that a bit. It has been taken in by some companies for >>>> specific purposes but very few have switched to linux on the desktop >>>> in total. >>> >>> No correction needed. >>> >>>>> As different gov'ts and businesses switch to Linux then the consumer >>>>> world will grow. >>>>> >>>> That's been the story for 20+ years now. No indication that it is >>>> more than a pipe dream. >>>> >>>> >>>>> http://thevarguy.com/open-source-application-software- >> companies/091515/ >>>> ubuntu-linux-based-open-source-os-runs-42-percent-dell-pc >>>>> >>>>> http://tinyurl.com/pr2d3bx >>>>> >>>>> India is switching over also. >>>> >>>> The story is nice, another 'this is the year of linux' that appear >>>> every year for almost 20 years now. When the dust settles this time >>>> next year, >>>> there will be another story similar to it. >>>> >>>> But the 1.5% of marketshare will remain the same. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Nobody said anything about a year. Just showing that Linux is growing >>> in large chunks. >>> Who care about market share. Most Linux distros aren't sold so are not >>> part of the "market" >>> By the way that is just two examples. >> >> Except for the fact that it isn't growing by even small chunks, you are >> absolutely correct. And I'd say give it 5 years and it might just make >> 1.55% at the rate it is growing now. >> >> >> >> >> > When it grows at the rate of 20-25000 at one time I would say that is > large chunks. When that actually happens let me know. Sure hasn't happened yet. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mike <ham789@netzero.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 18:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mtd65o$r8s$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #8206 |
On 9/16/2015 2:45 PM, Caver1 wrote: > On 09/16/2015 05:40 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:25:47 -0400, Caver1 wrote: >> >>> On 09/16/2015 04:17 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:13:14 -0500, chrisv wrote: >>>> >>>>> mike wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I never advocated fewer choices. >>>>> >>>>> "Desktop linux already has WAY too much CHOICE." - "mike" >>>>> >>>>>> (remainder snipped, unread) >>>>> >>>>> I know. You think that you know better than everyone else. If only >>>>> you were dictator, and could allocate resources, the world would be >>>>> better-off. You would eliminate "wasteful" and "redundant" work on >>>>> competing ideas on how to do things best. You would disallow the >>>>> offering of anything but one STANDARD Linux, for the good of us all. >>>>> >>>>> Maybe you should consider starting your own communist "utopia" >>>>> somewhere, comrad. >>>> >>>> Time after time, post after post, you demonstrate that you are happy >>>> with the hobbyist/developer open and free model for desktop linux. And >>>> I have no problem with that. It gathers a solid 1.5% of the market and >>>> is fringe enough to fill that tiniest of tech niches. >>>> >>>> But then don't complain when linux desktop goes nowhere in the >>>> commercial/ >>>> consumer world. That's because the things you believe important about >>>> linux desktop are exactly what prevents that from ever changing. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Linux has taken over some of the commercial world and is growing rapidly >>> in the rest. >> >> Let's correct that a bit. It has been taken in by some companies for >> specific purposes but very few have switched to linux on the desktop in >> total. > > No correction needed. > >>> As different gov'ts and businesses switch to Linux then the consumer >>> world will grow. >>> >> That's been the story for 20+ years now. No indication that it is more >> than a pipe dream. >> >> >>> http://thevarguy.com/open-source-application-software-companies/091515/ >> ubuntu-linux-based-open-source-os-runs-42-percent-dell-pc >>> >>> http://tinyurl.com/pr2d3bx >>> >>> India is switching over also. >> >> The story is nice, another 'this is the year of linux' that appear every >> year for almost 20 years now. When the dust settles this time next year, >> there will be another story similar to it. >> >> But the 1.5% of marketshare will remain the same. >> >> >> > > Nobody said anything about a year. Just showing that Linux is growing in > large chunks. > Who care about market share. Most Linux distros aren't sold so are not > part of the "market" > By the way that is just two examples. > Nice sound bite. Would be much more persuasive if the article had stated how many units. 42% of how many units. And how does that compare to the population of China? These articles find some niche and extrapolate that to desktop linux success. Many of the "successes" have been in cases where some organization created an appliance based on linux and forced the organization to comply. That's an excellent application for linux. Gurus install/configure/maintain the appliance optimized for the work of the user. That's great. Linux deserves to used on the desktop. If it saves my tax dollars so the government can spend it on other crap I don't need, I'm all for it. But, that's a far cry from joe average making the decision to use linux as his only computing platform on his home desktop. Many are not willing to risk leaping into that deep/dark chasm that is the linux desktop experience. Once you get past surfing the web, the "choices" are mind boggling. A little organization on the part of developers could make a huge change in that overnight. They just don't want to. And that's sad.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 07:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <spclvatjur8sbfj5leoi3olgneln1tf3um@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #8218 |
mike wrote: >They just don't want to. And that's sad. What's sad is mental midgets wanting to supress the freedom of others, remove other people's choices, so that they can have the restricted choice that they personally want. -- "Can you imagine if the all the skilled resources spread over 500 distros were to actually work together? As it is, all most do is cherry pick other peoples hard work, change it for some petty reason and then leave that branch to gather cobwebs as their interested wains. The result is a confused market place and disgruntled customers." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 18:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mtfk5k$bcd$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #8236 |
On 9/17/2015 7:37 AM, chrisv wrote: > mike wrote: > >> They just don't want to. And that's sad. > > What's sad is mental midgets wanting to supress the freedom of others, > remove other people's choices, so that they can have the restricted > choice that they personally want. Yes, isn't it something how on one hand they say Linux only has 1.5% of the market, and on the other hand they fight tooth and nail against Linux? All those billions in profits Crapple and M$ makes aren't enough for their shills? They won't be happy unless those are the only two choices? And then a certain thing that will remain nameless can tell us that's actually abundant choice.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 00:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d612nuFmaj4U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #8291 |
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 18:59:47 -0500, Nobody wrote: > On 9/17/2015 7:37 AM, chrisv wrote: >> mike wrote: >> >>> They just don't want to. And that's sad. >> >> What's sad is mental midgets wanting to supress the freedom of others, >> remove other people's choices, so that they can have the restricted >> choice that they personally want. > > Yes, isn't it something how on one hand they say Linux only has 1.5% of > the market, and on the other hand they fight tooth and nail against > Linux? No fighting involved, at least for me. Linux desktop is technically fine, it just has a structure behind it that will keep it on the smallest of fringes. None of that structure is about the technology, just mindsets and idiocy when it comes to business. All those billions in profits Crapple and M$ makes aren't > enough for their shills? They won't be happy unless those are the only > two choices? And then a certain thing that will remain nameless can > tell us that's actually abundant choice. A bullshit statement from no-brains, what's new about that? -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 16 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.comp.os.windows-10
csiph-web