Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #182795
| From | Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10 |
| Subject | Re: Today's "Windows 10 concern" |
| Date | 2025-03-06 10:33 +0000 |
| Organization | NOYB |
| Message-ID | <vqc15v.hq0.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <vq9imi$2e7gt$1@dont-email.me> <vqabig$2ioi8$1@dont-email.me> |
Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote: [...] > https://www.thewindowsclub.com/device-census-in-windows-10 > > These descriptions are a bit on the funny side. > > It could be accessing the webcam, to collect PNP info, but > that story is weak sauce. Unless the device has firmware > it loads each time, and there are likely better ways to determine > what firmware is being used, without probing the device. > > The device has already been probed as part of hardware enumeration. > And that effort should be all that is needed. If Microsoft > wanted to use their command line version of Device Manager to > dump the hardware details, they could do that, and then the > webcam would never be blocked. AFAICT, this isn't really something to get one's knickers in a twist about. During installation - at least on Windows 11 - there's a question about this [1] and in Settings you can limit - but not eliminate - the amount of 'Diagnostic data', you can 'View diagnostic data' and you can 'Delete diagnostic data'. For details: Settings -> Privacy & security -> Diagnostics & feedback If one decides to try to prevent Diagnostic data to be sent - preferably based on the actual content -, then it's probably best to try to block it in the firewall, instead of assuming/hoping that the Task Scheduler task won't be re-enabled. FWIW, my 'Diagnostic data' setting is set to 'Sending required data' and my computer hasn't been taken over by Microsoft (yet!? :-)). [...] [1] "Send diagnostic data to Microsoft" -> Required only -> [Accept]
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Today's "Windows 10 concern" "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-05 05:13 -0800
Re: Today's "Windows 10 concern" Mr Xi Ji Ping <ping@china.cn> - 2025-03-05 18:00 +0000
Re: Today's "Windows 10 concern" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-05 15:18 -0500
Re: Today's "Windows 10 concern" Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-03-06 10:33 +0000
Re: Today's "Windows 10 concern" "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-06 17:40 -0800
Re: Today's "Windows 10 concern" Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-03-07 08:31 -0500
Re: Today's "Windows 10 concern" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-07 19:04 -0500
Re: Today's "Windows 10 concern" The Car <arriving@dawn.com> - 2025-03-08 10:39 -0800
Re: Today's "Windows 10 concern" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-08 14:36 -0500
Re: Today's "Windows 10 concern" micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-03-06 18:45 -0500
Re: Today's "Windows 10 concern" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-06 20:15 -0500
Re: Today's "Windows 10 concern" ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-03-07 01:02 -0700
Re: Today's "Windows 10 concern" micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-03-08 00:11 -0500
csiph-web