Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #182617
| From | Geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10, rec.photo.digital |
| Subject | Re: Burn caption into video |
| Date | 2025-02-28 11:36 +1300 |
| Organization | Dis |
| Message-ID | <vpqpdb$3a4nb$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <vpmh8p$2fkd6$1@dont-email.me> <vpnsuo$2nbfq$1@dont-email.me> <vpobja$2puii$1@dont-email.me> <vpoh0h$2qkml$1@dont-email.me> <vpqbvt$37sfv$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 28/02/2025 7:47 am, Oliver wrote: > On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 15:00:49 +1300, Geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote >>> For that, Subtitle Edit & ffmpeg freeware appear to work fine, but it's >>> wonderful that there are professional level tools to help the creators. >> >> That's really the 'amateur' version, though capable of 'pro' results. >> Their (Magix, was Sony, was Sonic Foundry) professional equiv is Vegas >> Pro. Any functions are optional, and subtitles is just a very basis one. >> >> I guess it comes down to factor such as $$$ spent, ease of >> implementing subtitles (and tweaking of them), how you value your >> time, etc. > > I appreciate that you brought up the professional tools as compared to teh > freeware tools, where there is often a 1:1 freeware copy to the pro tools. > > An example is PhotoShop versus Paint.NET/Pinta on the Windows platform. > The freeware tools do almost everything the pro tools do, as that's what > their main raison d'etre is after all. To copy what the pro tools do. > > In that case, you get most of the pro editing functionality, for free. > And, as a bonus, the freeware tools are easier to use than the pro tools. > > So I agree with you that it depends a lot on how you value your time. > Speaking of how much time it takes to do something... > I agree with you that the professional GUIs often can sometimes do far more > than the freeware GUIs do, but even so, I think we perhaps might be hard > pressed to find a professional GUI that does much of anything faster than > some of the free command-line programs suggested in this thread can do. > > For example, a 'deshake' operation with ffmpeg freeware is pretty fast. > ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -vf deshake output_deshake.mp4 > > So is a 'rotate by 180 degrees' pretty fast on the freeware command line. > ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -vf "transpose=1,transpose=1" output.mp4 > > So is embedding yellow 32-point fonts pretty fast as a freeware command. > ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -vf > "subtitles=input.srt:force_style='FontSize=32,PrimaryColour=&H00FFFF'" > output.mp4 > > Extracting thumbnails is also very easy on the freeware command line. > ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -vf "fps=1/5" thumb%04d.jpg > So is embedding any chosen thumbnail easily to do as a freeware command: > ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -i thumbnail.jpg -map 0 -map 1 -c copy - > disposition:v:1 attached_pic output.mp4 > > Removing metadata (including thumbnails) is also easy on the command line. > ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -map 0 -map_metadata -1 -c copy output.mp4 > > Cropping/blurring areas using the cmd line is much more work though. > > Crop out a section 20 pixels from the top and 20 pixels from the bottom. > ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -filter:v "crop=in_w:in_h-40" -c:a copy output.mp4 > Blur out a section 20 pixels from the top and 20 pixels from the bottom. > ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -vf "split[original][blurred]; > [blurred]crop=iw:20:0:0,boxblur=luma_r=10 > > Crop to an 80-by-60 pixel area, starting from position (200,100). > ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -filter:v "crop=80:60:200:100" -c:a copy output.mp4 > Blur an 80-by-60 pixel area, starting from position (200,100). > ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -filter:v "crop=iw:ih:0:0,split[original][blurred]; > [blurred]crop=80:60:200:100,boxblur=luma_r=10:chroma_r=5[blurred_cropped];[original][blurred_cropped]overlay=200:100[out]" -map "[out]" -map 0:a? -c:a copy output.mp4 > > As is speeding up (or slowing down) a section a little more work though. > AFAIK, you have to first chop the input video up into separate sections. > ffmpeg -ss 00:01:00 -i video1.mp4 -to 00:02:00 video1-cut1.mp4 > > And then you can speed up that section (handling audio how you want). > ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -vf "setpts=0.5*PTS" -af "atempo=2.0" output.mp4 > > And then you can reassemble the separate sections back together. > dir /b *.mp4 > list.txt ffmpeg -f concat -i list.txt -c copy output.mp4 > > So far, I've had to do all those things repeatedly with my short videos > taken from my phone. I find ffmpeg does it fast once you know the command. > > But I think the two or three things your suggested professional GUI would > probably do faster & easier might be these three tasks I have had to do. > > 1. subtitles of what I want to point out in the video > 2. cropping (or blurring) hand drawn areas of the video > 3. speeding up/slowing down entire sections of the video > > > While I found that I had to use the SubtitleEdit freeware GUI to make > adding subtitles into a push-button simplicity, the other two are harder. > > Is it very easy to do those other things using your suggested pro program? Yes. And not even the 'pro' level app. But you seem to equate 'paid for' as 'professional' - which is not the case. Your 'free' does seem to involve a hell of a lot of unintuitive frigging around to achieve basic results. But whatever gets you through the night.... -- geoff
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Burn caption into video Oliver <ollie@invalid.net> - 2024-10-15 07:12 -0600
Re: Burn caption into video Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2024-10-15 09:56 -0400
Re: Burn caption into video Big Al <alan@invalid.com> - 2024-10-15 10:14 -0400
Re: Burn caption into video Big Al <alan@invalid.com> - 2024-10-15 10:15 -0400
Re: Burn caption into video Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2024-10-15 10:20 -0400
Re: Burn caption into video Big Al <alan@invalid.com> - 2024-10-15 10:51 -0400
Re: Burn caption into video Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2024-10-15 15:48 -0400
Re: Burn caption into video Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-10-15 13:12 -0400
Re: Burn caption into video Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2024-10-15 15:49 -0400
Re: Burn caption into video Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2024-10-15 10:18 -0400
Re: Burn caption into video Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-10-15 13:24 -0400
Re: Burn caption into video Oliver <ollie@invalid.net> - 2024-10-15 17:53 -0600
Re: Burn caption into video Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-10-16 06:21 -0400
Re: Burn caption into video "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-10-15 22:22 +0200
Re: Burn caption into video Oliver <ollie@invalid.net> - 2025-02-26 00:52 -0700
Re: Burn caption into video Geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> - 2025-02-27 09:18 +1300
Re: Burn caption into video Oliver <ollie@invalid.net> - 2025-02-26 17:28 -0700
Re: Burn caption into video Geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> - 2025-02-27 15:00 +1300
Re: Burn caption into video Oliver <ollie@invalid.net> - 2025-02-27 11:47 -0700
Re: Burn caption into video Geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> - 2025-02-28 11:36 +1300
Re: Burn caption into video Oliver <ollie@invalid.net> - 2025-02-27 17:33 -0700
Re: Burn caption into video Geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> - 2025-02-28 15:15 +1300
Re: Burn caption into video Geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> - 2025-02-28 15:20 +1300
Re: Burn caption into video candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-03-23 16:00 +0000
csiph-web