Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #187222

Re: Search engine 'security'

From "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.comp.os.windows-10
Subject Re: Search engine 'security'
Date 2025-09-04 14:49 +0200
Organization XXII
Message-ID <mhtg77FpnefU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <109bpet$1n1hk$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 4 Sep 2025 11:25:32 +0100, Jim the Geordie wrote:

> Is DuckDuckGo no better than Google? If so, I'm going back to Google as 
> it is a better search engine IMO, and I'll live with the spam.

Just use Startpage.com. It's Google without Google collecting you
history.

-- 
s|b

Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Search engine 'security' Jim the Geordie <jim@geordieland.com> - 2025-09-04 11:25 +0100
  Re: Search engine 'security' Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2025-09-04 12:46 +0100
    Re: Search engine 'security' Jim the Geordie <jim@geordieland.com> - 2025-09-04 13:22 +0100
      Re: Search engine 'security' MikeS <MikeS@fred.com> - 2025-09-04 13:35 +0100
      Re: Search engine 'security' "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-09-04 14:55 +0200
      Re: Search engine 'security' Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-09-04 12:13 -0400
  Re: Search engine 'security' "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-09-04 14:49 +0200
    Re: Search engine 'security' "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-09-04 15:38 +0200
      Re: Search engine 'security' Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2025-09-04 15:36 +0100
        Re: Search engine 'security' "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-09-04 17:38 +0200
        Re: Search engine 'security' Peter Johnson <peter@parksidewood.nospam> - 2025-09-04 17:01 +0100
      Re: Search engine 'security' "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-09-04 20:29 +0200
        Re: Search engine 'security' "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-09-04 21:20 +0200
          Re: Search engine 'security' "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-09-05 10:19 +0200
            Re: Search engine 'security' "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-09-05 14:45 +0200
  Re: Search engine 'security' Bing User <bing.user@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-04 14:46 +0000
    Re: Search engine 'security' "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-09-06 19:21 +0200
  Re: Search engine 'security' Humphry Davy <humphry@davy.uk.invalid> - 2025-09-04 17:31 +0100
    Re: Search engine 'security' Bing User <bing.user@outlook.com> - 2025-09-04 17:05 +0000
    Re: Search engine 'security' Jim the Geordie <jim@geordieland.com> - 2025-09-04 18:32 +0100
  Re: Search engine 'security' Paul in Houston TX <Paul@Houston.Texas> - 2025-09-04 12:19 -0500
    Re: Search engine 'security' Jim the Geordie <jim@geordieland.com> - 2025-09-04 18:34 +0100
      Re: Search engine 'security' Paul in Houston TX <Paul@Houston.Texas> - 2025-09-04 15:49 -0500
  Re: Search engine 'security' Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-09-04 20:58 +0000
    Re: Search engine 'security' Jim the Geordie <jim@geordieland.com> - 2025-09-05 00:09 +0100
      Re: Search engine 'security' Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-09-05 15:47 +0000

csiph-web