Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #181744
| From | Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10 |
| Subject | Re: Gmailify |
| Date | 2025-01-26 09:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <lvn89uF5o57U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <vn5cse$2ucpg$1@dont-email.me> <vn5ls0.v48.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> |
Frank Slootweg wrote: > 'Gmailify' is both a term used by*Google* and a*seperate* > company/service (gmailify.com). There's something wrong w/ that, in terms of 'stepping on the other's toes'. It seems that google wouldn't let a mail service company 'come along' and brand themselves as 'gmailify' AND, if the company WERE able to get some kind of trademark on gmailify even tho' it does confuse w/ the google brand gmail, then google wouldn't be able to promote ITS gmailify. That is, there's something wrong that the land sharks haven't duked out yet. -- Mike Easter
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Gmailify Jim the Geordie <jim@jimXscott.co.uk> - 2025-01-26 13:21 +0000
Re: Gmailify Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-26 14:54 +0000
Re: Gmailify Jim the Geordie <jim@jimXscott.co.uk> - 2025-01-26 16:15 +0000
Re: Gmailify Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2025-01-26 09:05 -0800
Re: Gmailify Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-26 19:17 +0000
csiph-web