Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.microsoft.windows > #966 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-06-17 12:04 +1200 |
| Last post | 2021-06-19 13:58 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 60 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.comp.microsoft.windows
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2021-06-17 12:04 +1200
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Brian Gregory <void-invalid-dead-dontuse@email.invalid> - 2021-06-17 01:52 +0100
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Sam E <why.should.this@be.email.invalid> - 2021-06-17 08:18 -0500
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2021-06-17 11:04 -0700
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 knuttle <keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net> - 2021-06-17 14:17 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-06-18 13:57 +0100
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2021-06-18 10:58 -0700
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-06-18 14:11 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2021-06-18 11:42 -0700
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-06-18 15:34 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> - 2021-06-18 20:48 +0100
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-06-18 15:53 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> - 2021-06-19 09:21 +0100
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-06-19 09:03 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> - 2021-06-19 14:48 +0100
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-06-19 10:12 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> - 2021-06-19 17:00 +0100
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-06-19 14:22 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> - 2021-06-20 00:04 +0100
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-06-21 11:27 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-06-19 12:15 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-06-19 14:22 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-06-19 23:13 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> - 2021-06-20 09:49 +0100
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-06-20 14:29 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> - 2021-06-21 07:55 +0100
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2021-06-21 08:35 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 David_B <BDon10@nomail.afraid.org> - 2021-06-21 16:56 +0100
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2021-06-21 16:02 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> - 2021-06-21 22:29 +0100
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-06-21 11:27 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-06-21 21:34 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2021-06-21 14:53 -0300
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-06-21 11:27 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2021-06-21 14:50 -0300
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-06-21 21:40 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-06-21 21:39 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> - 2021-06-19 21:42 +0100
Further thoughts invited (Was -[ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1) David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> - 2021-06-20 09:55 +0100
Re: Subthread ended (Was -[ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1) Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2021-06-20 08:25 -0400
Re: Subthread ended (Was -[ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1) David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> - 2021-06-20 18:33 +0100
Re: Subthread ended (Was -[ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2021-06-20 15:53 -0300
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2021-06-20 11:27 -0300
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2021-06-18 13:48 -0700
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-06-18 17:16 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2021-06-18 16:02 -0700
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-06-19 12:27 +0000
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2021-06-19 07:28 -0700
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-06-19 09:03 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2021-06-19 07:29 -0700
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-06-19 11:06 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-06-19 10:57 +0000
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2021-06-19 07:47 -0700
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-06-19 11:06 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2021-06-19 08:55 -0700
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-06-19 14:22 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2021-06-19 12:34 -0700
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-06-21 11:27 -0400
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-06-19 20:09 +0000
Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2021-06-19 13:58 -0700
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
| From | Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-06-17 12:04 +1200 |
| Subject | Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 11.1 |
| Message-ID | <794lcgh6ht9g9s4r7l25kh8g39rn32spl1@4ax.com> |
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 18:30:00 +0000, ? Good Guy ? <Hello.World@example.onion> wrote: >Windows 11.1 preview is here: > ><https://youtu.be/cN4j7Hw7Zs0> ><https://youtu.be/cN4j7Hw7Zs0> ><https://youtu.be/cN4j7Hw7Zs0> ><https://youtu.be/cN4j7Hw7Zs0> ><https://youtu.be/cN4j7Hw7Zs0> > > Is that all? Who thinks that's worth waiting for? -- Regards, Eric Stevens
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brian Gregory <void-invalid-dead-dontuse@email.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-06-17 01:52 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <iivkmcF2tafU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #966 |
On 17/06/2021 01:04, Eric Stevens wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 18:30:00 +0000, ? Good Guy ? > <Hello.World@example.onion> wrote: > >> Windows 11.1 preview is here: >> >> <https://youtu.be/cN4j7Hw7Zs0> >> <https://youtu.be/cN4j7Hw7Zs0> >> <https://youtu.be/cN4j7Hw7Zs0> >> <https://youtu.be/cN4j7Hw7Zs0> >> <https://youtu.be/cN4j7Hw7Zs0> >> >> > Is that all? Who thinks that's worth waiting for? > It's not real. It's a big Powerpoint presentation done by some random dude. -- Brian Gregory (in England).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam E <why.should.this@be.email.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-06-17 08:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <gYHyI.719315$2A5.560719@fx45.iad> |
| In reply to | #967 |
On 6/16/21 7:52 PM, Brian Gregory wrote: > On 17/06/2021 01:04, Eric Stevens wrote: >> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 18:30:00 +0000, ? Good Guy ? >> <Hello.World@example.onion> wrote: >> >>> Windows 11.1 preview is here: >>> >>> <https://youtu.be/cN4j7Hw7Zs0> >>> <https://youtu.be/cN4j7Hw7Zs0> >>> <https://youtu.be/cN4j7Hw7Zs0> >>> <https://youtu.be/cN4j7Hw7Zs0> >>> <https://youtu.be/cN4j7Hw7Zs0> >>> >>> >> Is that all? Who thinks that's worth waiting for? >> > > It's not real. > > It's a big Powerpoint presentation done by some random dude. with spam for a sig.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-06-17 11:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <sag2r5$8pm$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #966 |
Eric Stevens graced us with on 6/16/2021 5:04 PM: > On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 18:30:00 +0000, ? Good Guy ? > <Hello.World@example.onion> wrote: > >> > Is that all? Who thinks that's worth waiting for? So far, it appears to be mostly the GUI, with the underlying apps/programs/control panel applets/ &c still being an unglodly mix of Win10+Win8+Win7, ..., XP https://www.thurrott.com/windows/windows-11/251941/windows-11-first-impressions https://www.thurrott.com/windows/windows-11/251954/windows-11-a-few-more-screenshots -- Sailfish CDC Covid19 Trends: https://www.facebook.com/groups/624208354841034 Rare Mozilla Stuff: http://tinyurl.com/z86x3sg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | knuttle <keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-06-17 14:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <sag3j9$e6n$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #969 |
On 6/17/2021 2:04 PM, Sailfish wrote: > Eric Stevens graced us with on 6/16/2021 5:04 PM: >> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 18:30:00 +0000, ? Good Guy ? >> <Hello.World@example.onion> wrote: >> >>> >> Is that all? Who thinks that's worth waiting for? > > So far, it appears to be mostly the GUI, with the underlying > apps/programs/control panel applets/ &c still being an unglodly mix of > Win10+Win8+Win7, ..., XP > > https://www.thurrott.com/windows/windows-11/251941/windows-11-first-impressions > > https://www.thurrott.com/windows/windows-11/251954/windows-11-a-few-more-screenshots > > From what I have seen once you turn off all of the fluff, it will be Windows 10 with a red welcome screen. This will be a long awaited improvement over the old blue scrim I wonder it it will be the red screen of death instead of the blue screen of death. Red seems more fitting for that screen. Has anyone seen any system requirement, space requirements, or what computers and programs will not longer run Windows 11?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-06-18 13:57 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sai57r$ilo$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #969 |
On 17/06/2021 19:04, Sailfish wrote: > Eric Stevens graced us with on 6/16/2021 5:04 PM: >> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 18:30:00 +0000, ? Good Guy ? >> <Hello.World@example.onion> wrote: >> >>> >> Is that all? Who thinks that's worth waiting for? > > So far, it appears to be mostly the GUI, with the underlying > apps/programs/control panel applets/ &c still being an unglodly mix of > Win10+Win8+Win7, ..., XP Did you expect anything else? Windows hasn't fundamentally changed since Windows 7. It's all just a skinning exercise so that the vendors can sell more hardware which supports the 'new' windows.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-06-18 10:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <saimrc$4l8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #971 |
Chris graced us with on 6/18/2021 5:57 AM: > On 17/06/2021 19:04, Sailfish wrote: >> Eric Stevens graced us with on 6/16/2021 5:04 PM: >>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 18:30:00 +0000, ? Good Guy ? >>> <Hello.World@example.onion> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> Is that all? Who thinks that's worth waiting for? >> >> So far, it appears to be mostly the GUI, with the underlying >> apps/programs/control panel applets/ &c still being an unglodly mix of >> Win10+Win8+Win7, ..., XP > > Did you expect anything else? > > Windows hasn't fundamentally changed since Windows 7. It's all just a > skinning exercise so that the vendors can sell more hardware which > supports the 'new' windows. Actually, yes, and it still might happen since this is an early look-see at just the current GUI update direction and not the foundational changes. What I suspect is that they will make significant infrastructure changes that will put everything behind a pay wall, just like Apple, disallowing sideloading of non- Windows Store software. -- Sailfish CDC Covid19 Trends: https://www.facebook.com/groups/624208354841034 Rare Mozilla Stuff: http://tinyurl.com/z86x3sg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-06-18 14:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <180620211411339278%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #972 |
In article <saimrc$4l8$1@dont-email.me>, Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> wrote: > > Windows hasn't fundamentally changed since Windows 7. It's all just a > > skinning exercise so that the vendors can sell more hardware which > > supports the 'new' windows. > > Actually, yes, and it still might happen since this is an early look-see > at just the current GUI update direction and not the foundational > changes. What I suspect is that they will make significant > infrastructure changes that will put everything behind a pay wall, just > like Apple, disallowing sideloading of non- Windows Store software. apple doesn't disallow non-store software and has stated on many occasions that they aren't going to do that. on the other hand, microsoft tried that with windows 10s, but had to backpedal and call it a 'mode' of win10.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-06-18 11:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <saipf7$lm9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #973 |
nospam graced us with on 6/18/2021 11:11 AM: > In article <saimrc$4l8$1@dont-email.me>, Sailfish > <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> wrote: > >>> Windows hasn't fundamentally changed since Windows 7. It's all just a >>> skinning exercise so that the vendors can sell more hardware which >>> supports the 'new' windows. >> Actually, yes, and it still might happen since this is an early look-see >> at just the current GUI update direction and not the foundational >> changes. What I suspect is that they will make significant >> infrastructure changes that will put everything behind a pay wall, just >> like Apple, disallowing sideloading of non- Windows Store software. > > apple doesn't disallow non-store software and has stated on many > occasions that they aren't going to do that. > > on the other hand, microsoft tried that with windows 10s, but had to > backpedal and call it a 'mode' of win10. REF: https://www.zdnet.com/article/tim-cook-claims-sideloading-apps-would-destroy-security-and-privacy-of-ios/ [excerpt quote=\" Tim Cook has claimed in an interview with Brut that if Apple was forced to allow sideloading of apps, as Android does, it would destroy security and privacy of iOS. \" /] -- Sailfish CDC Covid19 Trends: https://www.facebook.com/groups/624208354841034 Rare Mozilla Stuff: http://tinyurl.com/z86x3sg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-06-18 15:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <180620211534309493%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #974 |
In article <saipf7$lm9$1@dont-email.me>, Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> wrote: > >>> Windows hasn't fundamentally changed since Windows 7. It's all just a > >>> skinning exercise so that the vendors can sell more hardware which > >>> supports the 'new' windows. > >> Actually, yes, and it still might happen since this is an early look-see > >> at just the current GUI update direction and not the foundational > >> changes. What I suspect is that they will make significant > >> infrastructure changes that will put everything behind a pay wall, just > >> like Apple, disallowing sideloading of non- Windows Store software. > > > > apple doesn't disallow non-store software and has stated on many > > occasions that they aren't going to do that. > > > > on the other hand, microsoft tried that with windows 10s, but had to > > backpedal and call it a 'mode' of win10. > REF: > > https://www.zdnet.com/article/tim-cook-claims-sideloading-apps-would-destroy-s > ecurity-and-privacy-of-ios/ > > [excerpt quote=\" > Tim Cook has claimed in an interview with Brut that if Apple was forced > to allow sideloading of apps, as Android does, it would destroy security > and privacy of iOS. > \" /] that's for the iphone/ipad, not the mac. the mac has always been able to run anything the user wants. recent versions of mac os will require the user to confirm unsigned apps and accept the risks, but that does not stop the user from running them if that's what they really want to do. mobile devices, both ios and android, limit what can be run because of the security risks. for android, it's easy to allow apps outside of the play store. for ios devices, it's a little more involved, but not impossible. app developers *must* be able to run their own apps, long before they're ever in the store, so there will *always* be a way to do it. unfortunately, we live in a world where running questionable software is risky. the carefree days are long gone.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-06-18 20:48 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <saita2$tsi$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #975 |
On 18/06/2021 20:34, nospam wrote: > unfortunately, we live in a world where running questionable software > is risky. the carefree days are long gone. As an aside .... Do you consider installing and running www.ClamXav.com to be risky?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-06-18 15:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <180620211553579549%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #976 |
In article <saita2$tsi$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>, David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > unfortunately, we live in a world where running questionable software > > is risky. the carefree days are long gone. > > As an aside .... > > Do you consider installing and running www.ClamXav.com to be risky? that didn't take long for you to try to derail the thread. your existence is what's risky.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-06-19 09:21 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sak9dk$bpa$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #977 |
On 18/06/2021 20:53, nospam wrote: > In article <saita2$tsi$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>, David Brooks > <DavidB@nomail.invalid> wrote: > >>> unfortunately, we live in a world where running questionable software >>> is risky. the carefree days are long gone. >> >> As an aside .... >> >> Do you consider installing and running www.ClamXav.com to be risky? > > that didn't take long for you to try to derail the thread. > > your existence is what's risky. I'm asking for your opinion of the wisdom of installing a non-Apple approved software package onto an Apple computer. Am I correct in my belief that by so doing one is giving root access to a stranger who can then take total control of one's computer?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-06-19 09:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <190620210903163210%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #981 |
In article <sak9dk$bpa$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>, David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> wrote: > >>> unfortunately, we live in a world where running questionable software > >>> is risky. the carefree days are long gone. > >> > >> As an aside .... > >> > >> Do you consider installing and running www.ClamXav.com to be risky? > > > > that didn't take long for you to try to derail the thread. > > > > your existence is what's risky. > > > I'm asking for your opinion of the wisdom of installing a non-Apple > approved software package onto an Apple computer. no you're not. you're trolling, as you usually do. this thread is *not* about apple, none of the many groups it's crossposted to are about apple, and your obsession with clamxav is wildly unhealthy, to where you repeatedly ask about it for no apparent reason. follow the footsteps of your kid and go away forever.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-06-19 14:48 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <saksji$8cp$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #985 |
On 19/06/2021 14:03, nospam wrote: > In article <sak9dk$bpa$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>, David Brooks > <DavidB@nomail.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> unfortunately, we live in a world where running questionable software >>>>> is risky. the carefree days are long gone. >>>> >>>> As an aside .... >>>> >>>> Do you consider installing and running www.ClamXav.com to be risky? >>> >>> that didn't take long for you to try to derail the thread. >>> >>> your existence is what's risky. >> >> >> I'm asking for your opinion of the wisdom of installing a non-Apple >> approved software package onto an Apple computer. > > no you're not. you're trolling, as you usually do. No. Not so. I'm seeking an answer - FROM *YOU* - about www.ClamXav.com (In front of witnesses!) > this thread is *not* about apple, none of the many groups it's > crossposted to are about apple, and your obsession with clamxav is > wildly unhealthy, to where you repeatedly ask about it for no apparent > reason. Much easier if you were to simply give your opinion on ClamXav Have you EVER installed it on YOUR computer(s)? > follow the footsteps of your kid and go away forever. That comment is in /really/ bad taste. :-(
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-06-19 10:12 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <190620211012201877%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #986 |
In article <saksji$8cp$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>, David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> unfortunately, we live in a world where running questionable software > >>>>> is risky. the carefree days are long gone. > >>>> > >>>> As an aside .... > >>>> > >>>> Do you consider installing and running www.ClamXav.com to be risky? > >>> > >>> that didn't take long for you to try to derail the thread. > >>> > >>> your existence is what's risky. > >> > >> > >> I'm asking for your opinion of the wisdom of installing a non-Apple > >> approved software package onto an Apple computer. > > > > no you're not. you're trolling, as you usually do. > > No. Not so. I'm seeking an answer - FROM *YOU* - about www.ClamXav.com > > (In front of witnesses!) > > > this thread is *not* about apple, none of the many groups it's > > crossposted to are about apple, and your obsession with clamxav is > > wildly unhealthy, to where you repeatedly ask about it for no apparent > > reason. > > Much easier if you were to simply give your opinion on ClamXav > > Have you EVER installed it on YOUR computer(s)? you've asked that 18 bazillion times before. probably more. > > follow the footsteps of your kid and go away forever. > > That comment is in /really/ bad taste. :-( yes it is, and intentionally so.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-06-19 17:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sal4aj$iod$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #987 |
On 19/06/2021 15:12, nospam wrote: > In article <saksji$8cp$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>, David Brooks > <DavidB@nomail.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>>> unfortunately, we live in a world where running questionable software >>>>>>> is risky. the carefree days are long gone. >>>>>> >>>>>> As an aside .... >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you consider installing and running www.ClamXav.com to be risky? >>>>> >>>>> that didn't take long for you to try to derail the thread. >>>>> >>>>> your existence is what's risky. >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm asking for your opinion of the wisdom of installing a non-Apple >>>> approved software package onto an Apple computer. >>> >>> no you're not. you're trolling, as you usually do. >> >> No. Not so. I'm seeking an answer - FROM *YOU* - about www.ClamXav.com >> >> (In front of witnesses!) >> >>> this thread is *not* about apple, none of the many groups it's >>> crossposted to are about apple, and your obsession with clamxav is >>> wildly unhealthy, to where you repeatedly ask about it for no apparent >>> reason. >> >> Much easier if you were to simply give your opinion on ClamXav >> >> Have you EVER installed it on YOUR computer(s)? > > you've asked that 18 bazillion times before. probably more. Quote relevant MIDs >>> follow the footsteps of your kid and go away forever. >> >> That comment is in /really/ bad taste. :-( > > yes it is, and intentionally so. Did YOU break this link? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kqytf31a8E
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-06-19 14:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <190620211422348369%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #994 |
In article <sal4aj$iod$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>, David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>> As an aside .... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Do you consider installing and running www.ClamXav.com to be risky? > >>>>> > >>>>> that didn't take long for you to try to derail the thread. > >>>>> > >>>>> your existence is what's risky. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I'm asking for your opinion of the wisdom of installing a non-Apple > >>>> approved software package onto an Apple computer. > >>> > >>> no you're not. you're trolling, as you usually do. > >> > >> No. Not so. I'm seeking an answer - FROM *YOU* - about www.ClamXav.com > >> > >> (In front of witnesses!) > >> > >>> this thread is *not* about apple, none of the many groups it's > >>> crossposted to are about apple, and your obsession with clamxav is > >>> wildly unhealthy, to where you repeatedly ask about it for no apparent > >>> reason. > >> > >> Much easier if you were to simply give your opinion on ClamXav > >> > >> Have you EVER installed it on YOUR computer(s)? > > > > you've asked that 18 bazillion times before. probably more. > > Quote relevant MIDs don't pretend that you never asked about it before. > >>> follow the footsteps of your kid and go away forever. > >> > >> That comment is in /really/ bad taste. :-( > > > > yes it is, and intentionally so. > > Did YOU break this link? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kqytf31a8E the link is not broken and it's even less relevant than your fucked up obsession with clamxav.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-06-20 00:04 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <salt60$lqm$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #997 |
On 19/06/2021 19:22, nospam wrote: > In article <sal4aj$iod$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>, David Brooks > <DavidB@nomail.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>>>> As an aside .... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do you consider installing and running www.ClamXav.com to be risky? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> that didn't take long for you to try to derail the thread. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> your existence is what's risky. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm asking for your opinion of the wisdom of installing a non-Apple >>>>>> approved software package onto an Apple computer. >>>>> >>>>> no you're not. you're trolling, as you usually do. >>>> >>>> No. Not so. I'm seeking an answer - FROM *YOU* - about www.ClamXav.com >>>> >>>> (In front of witnesses!) >>>> >>>>> this thread is *not* about apple, none of the many groups it's >>>>> crossposted to are about apple, and your obsession with clamxav is >>>>> wildly unhealthy, to where you repeatedly ask about it for no apparent >>>>> reason. >>>> >>>> Much easier if you were to simply give your opinion on ClamXav >>>> >>>> Have you EVER installed it on YOUR computer(s)? >>> >>> you've asked that 18 bazillion times before. probably more. >> >> Quote relevant MIDs > > don't pretend that you never asked about it before. You have never provided an answer >>>>> follow the footsteps of your kid and go away forever. >>>> >>>> That comment is in /really/ bad taste. :-( >>> >>> yes it is, and intentionally so. >> >> Did YOU break this link? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kqytf31a8E > > the link is not broken and it's even less relevant than your fucked up > obsession with clamxav. The link is posted in the signature of a poster known as Sn!pe Have you checked that it's not malicious?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-06-21 11:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <210620211127152075%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #1003 |
In article <salt60$lqm$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>, David Brooks <DavidB@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >>>>> follow the footsteps of your kid and go away forever. > >>>> > >>>> That comment is in /really/ bad taste. :-( > >>> > >>> yes it is, and intentionally so. > >> > >> Did YOU break this link? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kqytf31a8E > > > > the link is not broken and it's even less relevant than your fucked up > > obsession with clamxav. > > The link is posted in the signature of a poster known as Sn!pe doesn't matter. > Have you checked that it's not malicious? no need. it's a youtube video. the only malicious entity is you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.comp.microsoft.windows
csiph-web