Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.microsoft.windows > #2719
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux, uk.comp.os.linux, alt.comp.microsoft.windows |
| Subject | Re: Crimping tool, odd review |
| Date | 2025-05-30 16:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <m9tt54Fh12pU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <jKm*ZBGdA@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <1019f0h$3r5ur$1@dont-email.me> <kKm*FmIdA@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <101a54q$3vmta$1@dont-email.me> <lKm*bSIdA@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 2025-05-29 20:48, Theo wrote:
> In uk.comp.os.linux Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
>> On 2025-05-29 17:34, Theo wrote:
>>> Either that or an RJ45 socket at each end and a multimeter. But the tester
>>> makes it quicker.
>>>
>>> (can't speak for that tester - you need to test for open circuits, shorts
>>> and mis-wired pairs and I can't tell if it does that. In particular if it's
>>> structured wiring you need to be able to test from one end because you can't
>>> see both ends at the same time as the cable runs through the building -
>>> unless you can run a long patch cable back to the start)
>> As I understand, the two halves of those testers slide apart and you can
>> put one half at each end to perform the test.
>
> Do you need to see both ends to run the test, or is one sufficient?
You need to watch both ends, but doesn't need to be at the same time.
Yes, a fault can happen that is only detected at one end. Like the
lights going in a different order.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
Back to alt.comp.microsoft.windows | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Crimping tool, odd review Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2025-05-28 15:37 +0100
Re: Crimping tool, odd review Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-05-28 19:20 +0100
Re: Crimping tool, odd review Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 04:17 +0000
Re: Crimping tool, odd review Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2025-05-28 19:29 +0100
Re: Crimping tool, odd review Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-05-29 09:33 +0100
Re: Crimping tool, odd review Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2025-05-29 12:04 +0100
Re: Crimping tool, odd review Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-05-29 17:34 +0100
Re: Crimping tool, odd review Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2025-05-29 18:22 +0100
Re: Crimping tool, odd review Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-05-29 19:48 +0100
Re: Crimping tool, odd review Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2025-05-29 23:02 +0100
Re: Crimping tool, odd review Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-05-30 06:05 -0400
Re: Crimping tool, odd review Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2025-05-30 14:10 +0000
Re: Crimping tool, odd review Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> - 2025-07-01 09:10 +0000
Re: Crimping tool, odd review Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2025-07-01 18:46 +0100
Re: Crimping tool, odd review "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-07-01 20:58 +0200
Re: Crimping tool, odd review Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2025-05-29 22:55 +0000
Re: Crimping tool, odd review Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2025-05-30 11:56 +0100
Re: Crimping tool, odd review "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-30 16:20 +0200
Re: Crimping tool, odd review Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2025-05-29 11:21 +0000
Re: Crimping tool, odd review Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2025-05-29 12:38 +0100
Re: Crimping tool, odd review "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-29 13:54 +0200
csiph-web