Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.microsoft.windows > #3540
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.comp.microsoft.windows |
| Subject | Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? |
| Date | 2026-08-27 09:03 +0200 |
| Organization | Tebibyte_Retro_Gaming |
| Message-ID | <6245mmxe7e.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink) |
| References | <116n9nb$2hss$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <116ni78$ui00$1@dont-email.me> <116o3de$13gjm$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 2026-08-27 03:20, Paul wrote: > You can run them locally, but you have to be patient. For one request > to write a program, and with high reasoning enabled, it took 50 minutes > to half-write the program. The high reasoning took about eight minutes > of that, and the vast majority of the time was spent on token output. > > They tell me it would use a video card for token output,*if* the question > fits entirely within the video card. But with my puny hardware resources, it > always uses the CPU for token output, which can be slow. There is a chip that can accelerate the ai more than gpus. I read about it in the ieee spectrum magazine, but I don't remember the name of the thing. Laptops will come with that hardware so they can handle ai locally with reasonable battery usage. probably asking an ai about this it will tell better details than me :-D -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
Back to alt.comp.microsoft.windows | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-26 12:02 -0600
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2026-08-26 16:27 -0400
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-26 21:20 -0400
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-26 19:32 -0600
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-27 09:03 +0200
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-27 05:41 -0400
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? "....winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2026-08-27 12:38 -0400
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-27 14:31 -0400
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-27 23:15 +0200
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-29 20:49 +0100
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-29 16:38 -0400
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-29 22:43 +0100
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-30 01:27 -0400
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-26 19:32 -0600
csiph-web