Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.freeware > #251372 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-01 08:15 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-01-02 15:33 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 142 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.comp.freeware
An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-01 08:15 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-01 13:27 -0600
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-02 00:38 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-01-01 23:01 -0200
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-01 19:09 -0600
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-02 00:34 -0500
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-03 00:37 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-03 11:59 -0500
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-03 21:00 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-03 18:47 -0500
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-08 07:31 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-08 14:24 -0500
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-10 05:00 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-10 13:25 -0500
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-10 22:22 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-10 19:50 -0500
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2016-01-11 09:41 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-13 20:44 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2016-01-13 20:51 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-14 07:19 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2016-01-14 09:33 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-14 19:20 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.boh> - 2016-01-14 15:14 -0500
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs none <none@none.invalid> - 2016-01-14 12:47 -0800
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.uk> - 2016-01-15 07:15 -0500
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2016-01-14 20:14 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs none <none@none.invalid> - 2016-01-14 13:17 -0800
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.uk> - 2016-01-15 07:16 -0500
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2016-01-15 16:44 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.uk> - 2016-01-15 11:50 -0500
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2016-01-15 16:59 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs none <none@none.invalid> - 2016-01-15 09:05 -0800
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-15 20:30 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2016-01-15 21:02 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-16 08:03 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2016-01-16 09:13 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-16 22:30 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2016-01-17 00:35 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-17 00:36 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-13 20:44 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-10 20:16 -0600
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-13 20:44 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-13 15:13 -0600
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-14 07:19 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-14 10:43 -0600
Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-15 21:12 -0500
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-01-16 12:11 +0700
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-16 08:35 -0600
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-01-17 09:35 +0700
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-16 22:22 -0500
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-17 18:27 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-17 15:45 -0500
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page "Andrzej P. Wozniak" <uszer@poczta.onet.pl.invalid> - 2016-01-17 22:10 +0100
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-17 21:24 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-17 19:55 -0600
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-18 12:14 -0500
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-01-18 18:59 +0700
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page "Andrzej P. Wozniak" <uszer@poczta.onet.pl.invalid> - 2016-01-17 22:02 +0100
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-17 21:24 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2016-01-17 22:04 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-18 04:16 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-17 20:13 -0600
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-17 18:27 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] "Andrzej P. Wozniak" <uszer@poczta.onet.pl.invalid> - 2016-01-16 13:48 +0100
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2016-01-16 12:54 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] "Andrzej P. Wozniak" <uszer@poczta.onet.pl.invalid> - 2016-01-16 16:31 +0100
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2016-01-16 18:13 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2016-01-16 18:21 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-17 18:27 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-16 22:30 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] "Andrzej P. Wozniak" <uszer@poczta.onet.pl.invalid> - 2016-01-17 00:09 +0100
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2016-01-17 00:38 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-17 00:48 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-17 18:27 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2016-01-17 20:09 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-17 21:02 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2016-01-17 21:57 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-18 04:16 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2016-01-18 20:02 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.uk> - 2016-01-18 15:04 -0500
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-23 03:16 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-17 20:29 -0600
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-23 03:16 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-23 10:37 -0600
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-23 16:55 +0000
[OT] Pissing match with Raid (was: Please help check Firefox DL page) »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-23 13:57 -0600
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid (was: Please help check Firefox DL page) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-24 00:58 +0000
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid (was: Please help check Firefox DL page) »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-23 23:36 -0600
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid (was: Please help check Firefox DL page) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-24 17:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid (was: Please help check Firefox DL page) »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-24 12:42 -0600
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid (was: Please help check Firefox DL page) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-24 19:21 +0000
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid (was: Please help check Firefox DL page) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-24 01:14 +0000
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-23 23:05 -0600
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-24 17:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-24 12:38 -0600
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-24 19:21 +0000
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-24 13:58 -0600
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-24 21:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-24 16:53 -0600
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-25 01:16 +0000
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-25 01:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid hummingbird <hummingbird@127.0.0.1> - 2016-01-25 22:38 +0000
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-25 01:11 -0600
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2016-01-25 10:43 +0000
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-25 10:38 -0600
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-25 19:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid p-00-h the Kat in GPL hell - The voice of the Damned <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2016-01-25 20:33 +0000
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-25 14:53 -0600
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@mo.uk> - 2016-01-25 16:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-27 13:11 -0600
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-26 07:55 +0000
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2016-01-26 12:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-27 18:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2016-01-27 20:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-26 08:34 -0600
Re: [OT] Pissing match with Raid Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-27 18:55 +0000
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] Bill Day <extreeNONSENSE@verizon.net> - 2016-01-16 09:39 -0500
Re: Please help check Firefox DL page [was: An easy way to download Mozilla programs] Bill Day <extreeNONSENSE@verizon.net> - 2016-01-16 09:54 -0500
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-17 00:17 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2016-01-17 00:45 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-17 00:49 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2016-01-17 01:03 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-17 01:20 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2016-01-17 01:38 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-17 18:27 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs hummingbird <hummingbird@127.0.0.1> - 2016-01-25 21:15 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs p-00-h the Kat in GPL hell - The voice of the Damned <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2016-01-25 23:38 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs hummingbird <hummingbird@127.0.0.1> - 2016-01-30 23:11 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-03 00:37 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-03 19:41 -0600
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-04 03:29 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-01-02 08:17 +0700
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-01 19:22 -0600
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-01-02 20:38 +0700
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-02 15:53 -0600
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2016-01-01 21:32 +0100
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-01-02 00:38 +0000
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 22:11 +0800
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs CRNG <noemail@atthisdomain.gov> - 2016-01-02 08:54 -0600
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2016-01-02 16:28 +0100
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 23:35 +0800
Re: An easy way to download Mozilla programs CRNG <noemail@atthisdomain.gov> - 2016-01-02 15:33 -0600
Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-14 09:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <og3363mj0cxz.ziedew6500a4$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #252258 |
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 07:19:57 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: > "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" > <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> > news:1bu2y509yhj4y$.1jolgrtl8hj8g$.dlg@40tude.net Wed, 13 Jan 2016 > 20:51:06 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: > >> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:44:43 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: >> >>> "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" >>> <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> >>> news:g2dncdv89yrb.jd02ak3ex7j2$.dlg@40tude.net Mon, 11 Jan 2016 >>> 09:41:35 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:50:46 -0500, Susan Bugher wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 1/10/2016 5:22 PM, Diesel wrote: >>>>>> Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> >>>>>> news:dfflu9F69d8U1@mid.individual.net Sun, 10 Jan 2016 >>>>>> 18:25:37 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/10/2016 12:00 AM, Diesel wrote: >>>>>>>> Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>> news:dfagkdFr7ucU1@mid.individual.net Fri, 08 Jan 2016 >>>>>>>> 19:24:17 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>> If you want to prevent communication issues in future >>>>>>>>> posts, I suggest you stop looking in the wrong direction >>>>>>>>> (Linux vs. Windiows) and focus on furnishing *adequate* >>>>>>>>> information to identifiy the specific problem file or >>>>>>>>> files.you're posting about. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I already stated that I'd obviously made an error by not >>>>>>>> specifically mentioning it was the Windows English-US >>>>>>>> binaries I was hunting for. I figured the news reader I >>>>>>>> use/previous discussions I've taken part in (few having >>>>>>>> anything to do with linux) would have made the OS binaries >>>>>>>> (perhaps not the language) obvious. I realize that was a >>>>>>>> gross error on my part and I shouldn't make any such >>>>>>>> assumptions in the future. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As far as linux vs windows and looking in the wrong >>>>>>>> direction, I don't know what you mean by the statement. I'm >>>>>>>> fairly neutral as far as the OS wars topics go... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I meant that your definition of the communication issue was >>>>>>> wrong. Linux vs. Windows was immaterial. The same type of >>>>>>> problem can occur with Windows only programs. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Is still broken. If you try to download the Windows English-US >>>>>> versions, you will be provided the WRONG binary - confirmed >>>>>> again as of writing this post. It never had anything to do >>>>>> with a bad cache on my end, and it *did not* work either time >>>>>> I mentioned the issue. It's still *not* working. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's known by many regulars that I'm based in the USA, so >>>>>> logically, I would have been trying to download Windows >>>>>> english-US firefox from the url above, that I mentioned, days >>>>>> ago, wasn't working properly. It's really not a hard stretch >>>>>> on this. >>>>>> >>>>>>> A theoritical example : >>>>>>> <http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/irfanview.html> >>>>>>> There are three download links on the web page. In theory >>>>>>> they all produce the same file. If you get the wrong file >>>>>>> from ONE of those links that does not mean you can assume the >>>>>>> other two links will also produce the wrong file. >>>>>> >>>>>> The links offered on the mozilla site are not supposed to >>>>>> offer the 'same' file for all download links. Some are clearly >>>>>> intended for non Windows OS. your example doesn't really fit >>>>>> in this case. It's the english-US firefox for windows links >>>>>> that remain broken on Mozilla's end. >>>>>> >>>>>>> FWIW I actually ran into the *one* bad file case on Major >>>>>>> Geeks once (different program whose name I don't recall). I >>>>>>> emailed them, they checked and fixed thI properly >>>>>> >>>>>> I seriously doubt i'm the only user who's tried to download >>>>>> the English-US versions of Windows Firefox from the >>>>>> aforementioned url only to be provided v43.0.1. It's been >>>>>> doing this since 43.0.2 was released as a matter of fact. So >>>>>> I'm not thinking an email from me would be necessary at this >>>>>> point. They have to know somethings wrong already. >>>>> >>>>> You said "your example doesn't really fit in this case" while I >>>>> think it fits very well. That makes it EOT time for me. >>>>> >>>>> HAND >>>>> >>>>> Susan >>>> >>>> Well spanked Susan. Diesel [Dusty, Dustin, Slam and many other >>>> nyms] is a nasty misogynist troll. >>> >>> I don't know Dusty. I've never used any such nym. It's a pet name >>> you've decided to use because you can't reasonably defend your >>> side of the argument concerning some discussions we've had. You >>> don't appreciate logic and reason. >>> >>> SLAM isn't a nym. It was (long since disbanded) a pro VX group. >>> I've had very few nyms, actually. And, unlike yourself, I've >>> never attemped to hide/mask my identity while using one. >> >> Liar, liar, pants on fire. > > Be specific. What are you accusing me of lying about? > > If you're trying for the nym Raid during my pro vx days, you're > *really* stretching. So you admit you are lying then. Larf. Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly. -- p-0.0-h the cat Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat, Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy, Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath, the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme, the OVERCAT[The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll, shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook, smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag, liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav, lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball. NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery. By Appointment to God Frank-Lin. Signature integrity check md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-14 19:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA58F9343E3E12F7D9A8@dieselpower.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #252263 |
"p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> news:og3363mj0cxz.ziedew6500a4$.dlg@40tude.net Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:33:36 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 07:19:57 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: > >> "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" >> <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> >> news:1bu2y509yhj4y$.1jolgrtl8hj8g$.dlg@40tude.net Wed, 13 Jan >> 2016 20:51:06 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:44:43 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: >>> >>>> "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" >>>> <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> >>>> news:g2dncdv89yrb.jd02ak3ex7j2$.dlg@40tude.net Mon, 11 Jan 2016 >>>> 09:41:35 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:50:46 -0500, Susan Bugher wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 1/10/2016 5:22 PM, Diesel wrote: >>>>>>> Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> >>>>>>> news:dfflu9F69d8U1@mid.individual.net Sun, 10 Jan 2016 >>>>>>> 18:25:37 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/10/2016 12:00 AM, Diesel wrote: >>>>>>>>> Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>>> news:dfagkdFr7ucU1@mid.individual.net Fri, 08 Jan 2016 >>>>>>>>> 19:24:17 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If you want to prevent communication issues in future >>>>>>>>>> posts, I suggest you stop looking in the wrong direction >>>>>>>>>> (Linux vs. Windiows) and focus on furnishing *adequate* >>>>>>>>>> information to identifiy the specific problem file or >>>>>>>>>> files.you're posting about. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I already stated that I'd obviously made an error by not >>>>>>>>> specifically mentioning it was the Windows English-US >>>>>>>>> binaries I was hunting for. I figured the news reader I >>>>>>>>> use/previous discussions I've taken part in (few having >>>>>>>>> anything to do with linux) would have made the OS binaries >>>>>>>>> (perhaps not the language) obvious. I realize that was a >>>>>>>>> gross error on my part and I shouldn't make any such >>>>>>>>> assumptions in the future. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As far as linux vs windows and looking in the wrong >>>>>>>>> direction, I don't know what you mean by the statement. >>>>>>>>> I'm fairly neutral as far as the OS wars topics go... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I meant that your definition of the communication issue was >>>>>>>> wrong. Linux vs. Windows was immaterial. The same type of >>>>>>>> problem can occur with Windows only programs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is still broken. If you try to download the Windows >>>>>>> English-US versions, you will be provided the WRONG binary - >>>>>>> confirmed again as of writing this post. It never had >>>>>>> anything to do with a bad cache on my end, and it *did not* >>>>>>> work either time I mentioned the issue. It's still *not* >>>>>>> working. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's known by many regulars that I'm based in the USA, so >>>>>>> logically, I would have been trying to download Windows >>>>>>> english-US firefox from the url above, that I mentioned, >>>>>>> days ago, wasn't working properly. It's really not a hard >>>>>>> stretch on this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A theoritical example : >>>>>>>> <http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/irfanview.html> >>>>>>>> There are three download links on the web page. In theory >>>>>>>> they all produce the same file. If you get the wrong file >>>>>>>> from ONE of those links that does not mean you can assume >>>>>>>> the other two links will also produce the wrong file. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The links offered on the mozilla site are not supposed to >>>>>>> offer the 'same' file for all download links. Some are >>>>>>> clearly intended for non Windows OS. your example doesn't >>>>>>> really fit in this case. It's the english-US firefox for >>>>>>> windows links that remain broken on Mozilla's end. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> FWIW I actually ran into the *one* bad file case on Major >>>>>>>> Geeks once (different program whose name I don't recall). I >>>>>>>> emailed them, they checked and fixed thI properly >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I seriously doubt i'm the only user who's tried to download >>>>>>> the English-US versions of Windows Firefox from the >>>>>>> aforementioned url only to be provided v43.0.1. It's been >>>>>>> doing this since 43.0.2 was released as a matter of fact. So >>>>>>> I'm not thinking an email from me would be necessary at this >>>>>>> point. They have to know somethings wrong already. >>>>>> >>>>>> You said "your example doesn't really fit in this case" while >>>>>> I think it fits very well. That makes it EOT time for me. >>>>>> >>>>>> HAND >>>>>> >>>>>> Susan >>>>> >>>>> Well spanked Susan. Diesel [Dusty, Dustin, Slam and many other >>>>> nyms] is a nasty misogynist troll. >>>> >>>> I don't know Dusty. I've never used any such nym. It's a pet >>>> name you've decided to use because you can't reasonably defend >>>> your side of the argument concerning some discussions we've >>>> had. You don't appreciate logic and reason. >>>> >>>> SLAM isn't a nym. It was (long since disbanded) a pro VX group. >>>> I've had very few nyms, actually. And, unlike yourself, I've >>>> never attemped to hide/mask my identity while using one. >>> >>> Liar, liar, pants on fire. >> >> Be specific. What are you accusing me of lying about? >> >> If you're trying for the nym Raid during my pro vx days, you're >> *really* stretching. > > So you admit you are lying then. Larf. ROFL Jessalyn, that's a piss poor excuse for an answer to my question. I know.. I know, you haven't got anything to backup your accusation. I still like to watch you squirm and dance though. It's good cardio for you, and, heh, you aren't exactly over worked in that dept. [g] -- Hey listen... On your way back up, bring some popcorn...With salt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.boh> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-14 15:14 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <20160114151454.000025c1@buh.boh> |
| In reply to | #252279 |
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:20:26 -0000 (UTC) Diesel <me@privacy.net> wrote: > Jessalyn no such post showing. You drunk/high?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | none <none@none.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-14 12:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <mn.72ff7e015c8a7ca2.136606@none.invalid> |
| In reply to | #252280 |
burfordTjustice has brought this to us : > You drunk/high? Perfect example of the pot calling the kettle black! A few big differences though, Diesel isn't a child molesting, inbred, racist troll, like buuuuuuuuuurfoooooooord!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-15 07:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <20160115071549.00007754@buh.uk> |
| In reply to | #252282 |
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:47:31 -0800 none <none@none.invalid> wrote: > buuuuuuuuuurfoooooooord! We see no such poster, are you also drunk/high? All your posts indicate you have never posted sober.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-14 20:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mc0g9bdp0u1frq5t9qbg7r6c4q4c5p6lpq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #252279 |
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:20:26 -0000 (UTC), Diesel <me@privacy.net> wrote: >"p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" ><super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> >news:og3363mj0cxz.ziedew6500a4$.dlg@40tude.net Thu, 14 Jan 2016 >09:33:36 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: > >> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 07:19:57 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: >> >>> "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" >>> <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> >>> news:1bu2y509yhj4y$.1jolgrtl8hj8g$.dlg@40tude.net Wed, 13 Jan >>> 2016 20:51:06 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:44:43 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: >>>> >>>>> "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" >>>>> <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> >>>>> news:g2dncdv89yrb.jd02ak3ex7j2$.dlg@40tude.net Mon, 11 Jan 2016 >>>>> 09:41:35 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:50:46 -0500, Susan Bugher wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 1/10/2016 5:22 PM, Diesel wrote: >>>>>>>> Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>> news:dfflu9F69d8U1@mid.individual.net Sun, 10 Jan 2016 >>>>>>>> 18:25:37 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2016 12:00 AM, Diesel wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>>>> news:dfagkdFr7ucU1@mid.individual.net Fri, 08 Jan 2016 >>>>>>>>>> 19:24:17 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If you want to prevent communication issues in future >>>>>>>>>>> posts, I suggest you stop looking in the wrong direction >>>>>>>>>>> (Linux vs. Windiows) and focus on furnishing *adequate* >>>>>>>>>>> information to identifiy the specific problem file or >>>>>>>>>>> files.you're posting about. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I already stated that I'd obviously made an error by not >>>>>>>>>> specifically mentioning it was the Windows English-US >>>>>>>>>> binaries I was hunting for. I figured the news reader I >>>>>>>>>> use/previous discussions I've taken part in (few having >>>>>>>>>> anything to do with linux) would have made the OS binaries >>>>>>>>>> (perhaps not the language) obvious. I realize that was a >>>>>>>>>> gross error on my part and I shouldn't make any such >>>>>>>>>> assumptions in the future. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> As far as linux vs windows and looking in the wrong >>>>>>>>>> direction, I don't know what you mean by the statement. >>>>>>>>>> I'm fairly neutral as far as the OS wars topics go... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I meant that your definition of the communication issue was >>>>>>>>> wrong. Linux vs. Windows was immaterial. The same type of >>>>>>>>> problem can occur with Windows only programs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is still broken. If you try to download the Windows >>>>>>>> English-US versions, you will be provided the WRONG binary - >>>>>>>> confirmed again as of writing this post. It never had >>>>>>>> anything to do with a bad cache on my end, and it *did not* >>>>>>>> work either time I mentioned the issue. It's still *not* >>>>>>>> working. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's known by many regulars that I'm based in the USA, so >>>>>>>> logically, I would have been trying to download Windows >>>>>>>> english-US firefox from the url above, that I mentioned, >>>>>>>> days ago, wasn't working properly. It's really not a hard >>>>>>>> stretch on this. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A theoritical example : >>>>>>>>> <http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/irfanview.html> >>>>>>>>> There are three download links on the web page. In theory >>>>>>>>> they all produce the same file. If you get the wrong file >>>>>>>>> from ONE of those links that does not mean you can assume >>>>>>>>> the other two links will also produce the wrong file. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The links offered on the mozilla site are not supposed to >>>>>>>> offer the 'same' file for all download links. Some are >>>>>>>> clearly intended for non Windows OS. your example doesn't >>>>>>>> really fit in this case. It's the english-US firefox for >>>>>>>> windows links that remain broken on Mozilla's end. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> FWIW I actually ran into the *one* bad file case on Major >>>>>>>>> Geeks once (different program whose name I don't recall). I >>>>>>>>> emailed them, they checked and fixed thI properly >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I seriously doubt i'm the only user who's tried to download >>>>>>>> the English-US versions of Windows Firefox from the >>>>>>>> aforementioned url only to be provided v43.0.1. It's been >>>>>>>> doing this since 43.0.2 was released as a matter of fact. So >>>>>>>> I'm not thinking an email from me would be necessary at this >>>>>>>> point. They have to know somethings wrong already. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You said "your example doesn't really fit in this case" while >>>>>>> I think it fits very well. That makes it EOT time for me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> HAND >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Susan >>>>>> >>>>>> Well spanked Susan. Diesel [Dusty, Dustin, Slam and many other >>>>>> nyms] is a nasty misogynist troll. >>>>> >>>>> I don't know Dusty. I've never used any such nym. It's a pet >>>>> name you've decided to use because you can't reasonably defend >>>>> your side of the argument concerning some discussions we've >>>>> had. You don't appreciate logic and reason. >>>>> >>>>> SLAM isn't a nym. It was (long since disbanded) a pro VX group. >>>>> I've had very few nyms, actually. And, unlike yourself, I've >>>>> never attemped to hide/mask my identity while using one. >>>> >>>> Liar, liar, pants on fire. >>> >>> Be specific. What are you accusing me of lying about? >>> >>> If you're trying for the nym Raid during my pro vx days, you're >>> *really* stretching. >> >> So you admit you are lying then. Larf. > >ROFL > >Jessalyn, that's a piss poor excuse for an answer to my question. > >I know.. I know, you haven't got anything to backup your accusation. >I still like to watch you squirm and dance though. It's good cardio >for you, and, heh, you aren't exactly over worked in that dept. [g] > Here's RAID denying he's Dustin Cook. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.comp.anti-virus/IYMT49FhzF4 Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly. -- p-0.0-h the cat Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat, Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy, Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath, the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme, the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll, shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook, smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag, liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav, lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball. NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery. By Appointment to God Frank-Lin. Signature integrity check md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | none <none@none.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-14 13:17 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <mn.731d7e010e4891ef.136606@none.invalid> |
| In reply to | #252281 |
p-0''0-h the cat (ES) was thinking very hard : >>>>>>> Well spanked Susan. Diesel [Dusty, Dustin, Slam and many other >>>>>>> nyms] is a nasty misogynist troll. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't know Dusty. I've never used any such nym. It's a pet >>>>>> name you've decided to use because you can't reasonably defend >>>>>> your side of the argument concerning some discussions we've >>>>>> had. You don't appreciate logic and reason. >>>>>> >>>>>> SLAM isn't a nym. It was (long since disbanded) a pro VX group. >>>>>> I've had very few nyms, actually. And, unlike yourself, I've >>>>>> never attemped to hide/mask my identity while using one. >>>>> >>>>> Liar, liar, pants on fire. >>>> >>>> Be specific. What are you accusing me of lying about? >>>> >>>> If you're trying for the nym Raid during my pro vx days, you're >>>> *really* stretching. >>> >>> So you admit you are lying then. Larf. >> >> ROFL >> >> Jessalyn, that's a piss poor excuse for an answer to my question. >> >> I know.. I know, you haven't got anything to backup your accusation. >> I still like to watch you squirm and dance though. It's good cardio >> for you, and, heh, you aren't exactly over worked in that dept. [g] >> > > Here's RAID denying he's Dustin Cook. Jessalyn, you nym-shift more frequently than buuuuuuurfooooooord downloads kiddie porn (all day, everyday) and you have the nerve to throw stones at Diesel...... "What a maroon" -Bugs Bunny https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_Kh7nLplWo ROTFLMAO
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-15 07:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <20160115071638.0000451c@buh.uk> |
| In reply to | #252281 |
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:14:48 +0000 "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:20:26 -0000 (UTC), Diesel <me@privacy.net> > wrote: > > >"p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" > ><super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> > >news:og3363mj0cxz.ziedew6500a4$.dlg@40tude.net Thu, 14 Jan 2016 > >09:33:36 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 07:19:57 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: > >> > >>> "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" > >>> <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> > >>> news:1bu2y509yhj4y$.1jolgrtl8hj8g$.dlg@40tude.net Wed, 13 Jan > >>> 2016 20:51:06 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:44:43 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" > >>>>> <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> > >>>>> news:g2dncdv89yrb.jd02ak3ex7j2$.dlg@40tude.net Mon, 11 Jan 2016 > >>>>> 09:41:35 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:50:46 -0500, Susan Bugher wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 1/10/2016 5:22 PM, Diesel wrote: > >>>>>>>> Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> > >>>>>>>> news:dfflu9F69d8U1@mid.individual.net Sun, 10 Jan 2016 > >>>>>>>> 18:25:37 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2016 12:00 AM, Diesel wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> > >>>>>>>>>> news:dfagkdFr7ucU1@mid.individual.net Fri, 08 Jan 2016 > >>>>>>>>>> 19:24:17 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> If you want to prevent communication issues in future > >>>>>>>>>>> posts, I suggest you stop looking in the wrong direction > >>>>>>>>>>> (Linux vs. Windiows) and focus on furnishing *adequate* > >>>>>>>>>>> information to identifiy the specific problem file or > >>>>>>>>>>> files.you're posting about. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I already stated that I'd obviously made an error by not > >>>>>>>>>> specifically mentioning it was the Windows English-US > >>>>>>>>>> binaries I was hunting for. I figured the news reader I > >>>>>>>>>> use/previous discussions I've taken part in (few having > >>>>>>>>>> anything to do with linux) would have made the OS binaries > >>>>>>>>>> (perhaps not the language) obvious. I realize that was a > >>>>>>>>>> gross error on my part and I shouldn't make any such > >>>>>>>>>> assumptions in the future. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> As far as linux vs windows and looking in the wrong > >>>>>>>>>> direction, I don't know what you mean by the statement. > >>>>>>>>>> I'm fairly neutral as far as the OS wars topics go... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I meant that your definition of the communication issue was > >>>>>>>>> wrong. Linux vs. Windows was immaterial. The same type of > >>>>>>>>> problem can occur with Windows only programs. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/ > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Is still broken. If you try to download the Windows > >>>>>>>> English-US versions, you will be provided the WRONG binary - > >>>>>>>> confirmed again as of writing this post. It never had > >>>>>>>> anything to do with a bad cache on my end, and it *did not* > >>>>>>>> work either time I mentioned the issue. It's still *not* > >>>>>>>> working. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> It's known by many regulars that I'm based in the USA, so > >>>>>>>> logically, I would have been trying to download Windows > >>>>>>>> english-US firefox from the url above, that I mentioned, > >>>>>>>> days ago, wasn't working properly. It's really not a hard > >>>>>>>> stretch on this. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> A theoritical example : > >>>>>>>>> <http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/irfanview.html> > >>>>>>>>> There are three download links on the web page. In theory > >>>>>>>>> they all produce the same file. If you get the wrong file > >>>>>>>>> from ONE of those links that does not mean you can assume > >>>>>>>>> the other two links will also produce the wrong file. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The links offered on the mozilla site are not supposed to > >>>>>>>> offer the 'same' file for all download links. Some are > >>>>>>>> clearly intended for non Windows OS. your example doesn't > >>>>>>>> really fit in this case. It's the english-US firefox for > >>>>>>>> windows links that remain broken on Mozilla's end. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> FWIW I actually ran into the *one* bad file case on Major > >>>>>>>>> Geeks once (different program whose name I don't recall). I > >>>>>>>>> emailed them, they checked and fixed thI properly > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I seriously doubt i'm the only user who's tried to download > >>>>>>>> the English-US versions of Windows Firefox from the > >>>>>>>> aforementioned url only to be provided v43.0.1. It's been > >>>>>>>> doing this since 43.0.2 was released as a matter of fact. So > >>>>>>>> I'm not thinking an email from me would be necessary at this > >>>>>>>> point. They have to know somethings wrong already. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You said "your example doesn't really fit in this case" while > >>>>>>> I think it fits very well. That makes it EOT time for me. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> HAND > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Susan > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Well spanked Susan. Diesel [Dusty, Dustin, Slam and many other > >>>>>> nyms] is a nasty misogynist troll. > >>>>> > >>>>> I don't know Dusty. I've never used any such nym. It's a pet > >>>>> name you've decided to use because you can't reasonably defend > >>>>> your side of the argument concerning some discussions we've > >>>>> had. You don't appreciate logic and reason. > >>>>> > >>>>> SLAM isn't a nym. It was (long since disbanded) a pro VX group. > >>>>> I've had very few nyms, actually. And, unlike yourself, I've > >>>>> never attemped to hide/mask my identity while using one. > >>>> > >>>> Liar, liar, pants on fire. > >>> > >>> Be specific. What are you accusing me of lying about? > >>> > >>> If you're trying for the nym Raid during my pro vx days, you're > >>> *really* stretching. > >> > >> So you admit you are lying then. Larf. > > > >ROFL > > > >Jessalyn, that's a piss poor excuse for an answer to my question. > > > >I know.. I know, you haven't got anything to backup your accusation. > >I still like to watch you squirm and dance though. It's good cardio > >for you, and, heh, you aren't exactly over worked in that dept. [g] > > > > Here's RAID denying he's Dustin Cook. > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.comp.anti-virus/IYMT49FhzF4 > > Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly. > Seems none wants to visit you and suck your balls dry?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-15 16:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fd8i9b5ap4or5kkr962fltr5qr79a399bk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #252298 |
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 07:16:38 -0500, burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.uk> wrote: >Seems none wants to visit you and suck your balls dry? Well he's shit outta luck. Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly. -- p-0.0-h the cat Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat, Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy, Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath, the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme, the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll, shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook, smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag, liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav, lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball. NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery. By Appointment to God Frank-Lin. Signature integrity check md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-15 11:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <20160115115024.00000c45@buh.uk> |
| In reply to | #252307 |
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:44:26 +0000 "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 07:16:38 -0500, burfordTjustice > <burfordTjustice@buh.uk> wrote: > > >Seems none wants to visit you and suck your balls dry? > > Well he's shit outta luck. > > Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly. > none is probably a female. but could be a trans.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-15 16:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <k89i9bp3o8i0niqivnl3vqti1kchd6c9bn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #252308 |
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:50:24 -0500, burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.uk> wrote: >On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:44:26 +0000 >"p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote: > >> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 07:16:38 -0500, burfordTjustice >> <burfordTjustice@buh.uk> wrote: >> >> >Seems none wants to visit you and suck your balls dry? >> >> Well he's shit outta luck. >> >> Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly. >> > >none is probably a female. I'm still not tempted <complete lie> >but could be a trans. pass Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly. -- p-0.0-h the cat Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat, Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy, Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath, the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme, the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll, shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook, smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag, liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav, lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball. NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery. By Appointment to God Frank-Lin. Signature integrity check md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | none <none@none.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-15 09:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <mn.7a217e0187708721.136606@none.invalid> |
| In reply to | #252308 |
burfordTjustice explained : > On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:44:26 +0000 > "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote: > >> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 07:16:38 -0500, burfordTjustice >> <burfordTjustice@buh.uk> wrote: >> >>> Seems none wants to visit you and suck your balls dry? >> >> Well he's shit outta luck. >> >> Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly. >> > > none is probably a female. > but could be a trans. Everyone knows how much buuuuuuurfoooooord / bucky hates women and those who differ from him, in any way.......... ;-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-15 20:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA5909F10AEC22F7D9A8@dieselpower.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #252281 |
"p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> news:mc0g9bdp0u1frq5t9qbg7r6c4q4c5p6lpq@4ax.com Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:14:48 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:20:26 -0000 (UTC), Diesel <me@privacy.net> > wrote: > >>"p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" >><super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> >>news:og3363mj0cxz.ziedew6500a4$.dlg@40tude.net Thu, 14 Jan 2016 >>09:33:36 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 07:19:57 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: >>> >>>> "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" >>>> <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> >>>> news:1bu2y509yhj4y$.1jolgrtl8hj8g$.dlg@40tude.net Wed, 13 Jan >>>> 2016 20:51:06 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:44:43 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" >>>>>> <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> >>>>>> news:g2dncdv89yrb.jd02ak3ex7j2$.dlg@40tude.net Mon, 11 Jan >>>>>> 2016 09:41:35 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:50:46 -0500, Susan Bugher wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 1/10/2016 5:22 PM, Diesel wrote: >>>>>>>>> Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>>> news:dfflu9F69d8U1@mid.individual.net Sun, 10 Jan 2016 >>>>>>>>> 18:25:37 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2016 12:00 AM, Diesel wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>>>>> news:dfagkdFr7ucU1@mid.individual.net Fri, 08 Jan 2016 >>>>>>>>>>> 19:24:17 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you want to prevent communication issues in future >>>>>>>>>>>> posts, I suggest you stop looking in the wrong >>>>>>>>>>>> direction (Linux vs. Windiows) and focus on furnishing >>>>>>>>>>>> *adequate* information to identifiy the specific >>>>>>>>>>>> problem file or files.you're posting about. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I already stated that I'd obviously made an error by not >>>>>>>>>>> specifically mentioning it was the Windows English-US >>>>>>>>>>> binaries I was hunting for. I figured the news reader I >>>>>>>>>>> use/previous discussions I've taken part in (few having >>>>>>>>>>> anything to do with linux) would have made the OS >>>>>>>>>>> binaries (perhaps not the language) obvious. I realize >>>>>>>>>>> that was a gross error on my part and I shouldn't make >>>>>>>>>>> any such assumptions in the future. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> As far as linux vs windows and looking in the wrong >>>>>>>>>>> direction, I don't know what you mean by the statement. >>>>>>>>>>> I'm fairly neutral as far as the OS wars topics go... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I meant that your definition of the communication issue >>>>>>>>>> was wrong. Linux vs. Windows was immaterial. The same >>>>>>>>>> type of problem can occur with Windows only programs. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is still broken. If you try to download the Windows >>>>>>>>> English-US versions, you will be provided the WRONG binary >>>>>>>>> - confirmed again as of writing this post. It never had >>>>>>>>> anything to do with a bad cache on my end, and it *did >>>>>>>>> not* work either time I mentioned the issue. It's still >>>>>>>>> *not* working. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's known by many regulars that I'm based in the USA, so >>>>>>>>> logically, I would have been trying to download Windows >>>>>>>>> english-US firefox from the url above, that I mentioned, >>>>>>>>> days ago, wasn't working properly. It's really not a hard >>>>>>>>> stretch on this. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> A theoritical example : >>>>>>>>>> <http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/irfanview.html> >>>>>>>>>> There are three download links on the web page. In theory >>>>>>>>>> they all produce the same file. If you get the wrong file >>>>>>>>>> from ONE of those links that does not mean you can assume >>>>>>>>>> the other two links will also produce the wrong file. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The links offered on the mozilla site are not supposed to >>>>>>>>> offer the 'same' file for all download links. Some are >>>>>>>>> clearly intended for non Windows OS. your example doesn't >>>>>>>>> really fit in this case. It's the english-US firefox for >>>>>>>>> windows links that remain broken on Mozilla's end. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> FWIW I actually ran into the *one* bad file case on Major >>>>>>>>>> Geeks once (different program whose name I don't recall). >>>>>>>>>> I emailed them, they checked and fixed thI properly >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I seriously doubt i'm the only user who's tried to >>>>>>>>> download the English-US versions of Windows Firefox from >>>>>>>>> the aforementioned url only to be provided v43.0.1. It's >>>>>>>>> been doing this since 43.0.2 was released as a matter of >>>>>>>>> fact. So I'm not thinking an email from me would be >>>>>>>>> necessary at this point. They have to know somethings >>>>>>>>> wrong already. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You said "your example doesn't really fit in this case" >>>>>>>> while I think it fits very well. That makes it EOT time for >>>>>>>> me. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> HAND >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Susan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well spanked Susan. Diesel [Dusty, Dustin, Slam and many >>>>>>> other nyms] is a nasty misogynist troll. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't know Dusty. I've never used any such nym. It's a pet >>>>>> name you've decided to use because you can't reasonably >>>>>> defend your side of the argument concerning some discussions >>>>>> we've had. You don't appreciate logic and reason. >>>>>> >>>>>> SLAM isn't a nym. It was (long since disbanded) a pro VX >>>>>> group. I've had very few nyms, actually. And, unlike >>>>>> yourself, I've never attemped to hide/mask my identity while >>>>>> using one. >>>>> >>>>> Liar, liar, pants on fire. >>>> >>>> Be specific. What are you accusing me of lying about? >>>> >>>> If you're trying for the nym Raid during my pro vx days, you're >>>> *really* stretching. >>> >>> So you admit you are lying then. Larf. >> >>ROFL >> >>Jessalyn, that's a piss poor excuse for an answer to my question. >> >>I know.. I know, you haven't got anything to backup your >>accusation. I still like to watch you squirm and dance though. >>It's good cardio for you, and, heh, you aren't exactly over worked >>in that dept. [g] >> > > Here's RAID denying he's Dustin Cook. Ahem.. *rofl* As I previously stated: If you're trying for the nym Raid during my pro vx days, you're *really* stretching. some Avers knew me by first and last name despite the public and official denial posts. [g] <-- I had legit keys from some of them with a little deal I worked out... rofl. You don't need to know the specific details, you only needed to know they already knew me and the majority of the posturing on acv was a show. (Oh wait, Didn't some others express that opinion? Yes, yes they did. lol) Morons like you, thought it was how things are. Everyone else knew we weren't 'anonymous' and weren't that difficult to communicate with, if one wanted to do so. I wasn't always writing viruses (real viruses, not the horseshit that's passing for malware theses days. trivial script kiddie - your skill set, mebbe, level) I learned to program by writing actual legit stuff, long before. Real 'coders' have a signature/style of code. It wasn't too damn difficult to spot that signature if you had previous knowledge of my legit stuff. If you were into the crypto/freeware scenes, you did. So... Yea... You said I've had many nyms, but, I haven't. Raid is an old nym, but, well known and respected and/or still feared by many. rofl. Dunno why, I'm long since retired... reputation I suppose. And btw, who wouldn't deny (atleast in public rofl) being who they were while their stuff was spreading like an out of control wildfire on a global basis? I don't have 'idiot' tattooed on me, script kiddie. You said I was a troll, but, I'm not. :-) You lie and you bullshit, often/all the time. -- Hey listen... On your way back up, bring some popcorn...With salt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-15 21:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <41ni9bt2rtk8ss7ijq4hv1a2ddjsirb544@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #252321 |
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 20:30:03 -0000 (UTC), Diesel <me@privacy.net> wrote: >"p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> >news:mc0g9bdp0u1frq5t9qbg7r6c4q4c5p6lpq@4ax.com Thu, 14 Jan 2016 >20:14:48 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: > >> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:20:26 -0000 (UTC), Diesel <me@privacy.net> >> wrote: >> >>>"p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" >>><super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> >>>news:og3363mj0cxz.ziedew6500a4$.dlg@40tude.net Thu, 14 Jan 2016 >>>09:33:36 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 07:19:57 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: >>>> >>>>> "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" >>>>> <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> >>>>> news:1bu2y509yhj4y$.1jolgrtl8hj8g$.dlg@40tude.net Wed, 13 Jan >>>>> 2016 20:51:06 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:44:43 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" >>>>>>> <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> >>>>>>> news:g2dncdv89yrb.jd02ak3ex7j2$.dlg@40tude.net Mon, 11 Jan >>>>>>> 2016 09:41:35 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:50:46 -0500, Susan Bugher wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2016 5:22 PM, Diesel wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>>>> news:dfflu9F69d8U1@mid.individual.net Sun, 10 Jan 2016 >>>>>>>>>> 18:25:37 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2016 12:00 AM, Diesel wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> news:dfagkdFr7ucU1@mid.individual.net Fri, 08 Jan 2016 >>>>>>>>>>>> 19:24:17 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want to prevent communication issues in future >>>>>>>>>>>>> posts, I suggest you stop looking in the wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>> direction (Linux vs. Windiows) and focus on furnishing >>>>>>>>>>>>> *adequate* information to identifiy the specific >>>>>>>>>>>>> problem file or files.you're posting about. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I already stated that I'd obviously made an error by not >>>>>>>>>>>> specifically mentioning it was the Windows English-US >>>>>>>>>>>> binaries I was hunting for. I figured the news reader I >>>>>>>>>>>> use/previous discussions I've taken part in (few having >>>>>>>>>>>> anything to do with linux) would have made the OS >>>>>>>>>>>> binaries (perhaps not the language) obvious. I realize >>>>>>>>>>>> that was a gross error on my part and I shouldn't make >>>>>>>>>>>> any such assumptions in the future. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> As far as linux vs windows and looking in the wrong >>>>>>>>>>>> direction, I don't know what you mean by the statement. >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm fairly neutral as far as the OS wars topics go... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I meant that your definition of the communication issue >>>>>>>>>>> was wrong. Linux vs. Windows was immaterial. The same >>>>>>>>>>> type of problem can occur with Windows only programs. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Is still broken. If you try to download the Windows >>>>>>>>>> English-US versions, you will be provided the WRONG binary >>>>>>>>>> - confirmed again as of writing this post. It never had >>>>>>>>>> anything to do with a bad cache on my end, and it *did >>>>>>>>>> not* work either time I mentioned the issue. It's still >>>>>>>>>> *not* working. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's known by many regulars that I'm based in the USA, so >>>>>>>>>> logically, I would have been trying to download Windows >>>>>>>>>> english-US firefox from the url above, that I mentioned, >>>>>>>>>> days ago, wasn't working properly. It's really not a hard >>>>>>>>>> stretch on this. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> A theoritical example : >>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/irfanview.html> >>>>>>>>>>> There are three download links on the web page. In theory >>>>>>>>>>> they all produce the same file. If you get the wrong file >>>>>>>>>>> from ONE of those links that does not mean you can assume >>>>>>>>>>> the other two links will also produce the wrong file. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The links offered on the mozilla site are not supposed to >>>>>>>>>> offer the 'same' file for all download links. Some are >>>>>>>>>> clearly intended for non Windows OS. your example doesn't >>>>>>>>>> really fit in this case. It's the english-US firefox for >>>>>>>>>> windows links that remain broken on Mozilla's end. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> FWIW I actually ran into the *one* bad file case on Major >>>>>>>>>>> Geeks once (different program whose name I don't recall). >>>>>>>>>>> I emailed them, they checked and fixed thI properly >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I seriously doubt i'm the only user who's tried to >>>>>>>>>> download the English-US versions of Windows Firefox from >>>>>>>>>> the aforementioned url only to be provided v43.0.1. It's >>>>>>>>>> been doing this since 43.0.2 was released as a matter of >>>>>>>>>> fact. So I'm not thinking an email from me would be >>>>>>>>>> necessary at this point. They have to know somethings >>>>>>>>>> wrong already. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You said "your example doesn't really fit in this case" >>>>>>>>> while I think it fits very well. That makes it EOT time for >>>>>>>>> me. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> HAND >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Susan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Well spanked Susan. Diesel [Dusty, Dustin, Slam and many >>>>>>>> other nyms] is a nasty misogynist troll. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't know Dusty. I've never used any such nym. It's a pet >>>>>>> name you've decided to use because you can't reasonably >>>>>>> defend your side of the argument concerning some discussions >>>>>>> we've had. You don't appreciate logic and reason. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> SLAM isn't a nym. It was (long since disbanded) a pro VX >>>>>>> group. I've had very few nyms, actually. And, unlike >>>>>>> yourself, I've never attemped to hide/mask my identity while >>>>>>> using one. >>>>>> >>>>>> Liar, liar, pants on fire. >>>>> >>>>> Be specific. What are you accusing me of lying about? >>>>> >>>>> If you're trying for the nym Raid during my pro vx days, you're >>>>> *really* stretching. >>>> >>>> So you admit you are lying then. Larf. >>> >>>ROFL >>> >>>Jessalyn, that's a piss poor excuse for an answer to my question. >>> >>>I know.. I know, you haven't got anything to backup your >>>accusation. I still like to watch you squirm and dance though. >>>It's good cardio for you, and, heh, you aren't exactly over worked >>>in that dept. [g] >>> >> >> Here's RAID denying he's Dustin Cook. Link reinstated https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.comp.anti-virus/IYMT49FhzF4 >Ahem.. *rofl* Yo said I didn't have anything to back up my accusation. I've reinstated the link. ROFL back at ya! >As I previously stated: > >If you're trying for the nym Raid during my pro vx days, you're >*really* stretching. It was easy Dusty. No stretching was involved. >some Avers knew me by first and last name despite the public and >official denial posts. [g] <-- I had legit keys from some of them >with a little deal I worked out... rofl. You don't need to know the >specific details, you only needed to know they already knew me and >the majority of the posturing on acv was a show. (Oh wait, Didn't >some others express that opinion? Yes, yes they did. lol) > >Morons like you, thought it was how things are. Everyone else knew we >weren't 'anonymous' and weren't that difficult to communicate with, >if one wanted to do so. > >I wasn't always writing viruses (real viruses, not the horseshit >that's passing for malware theses days. trivial script kiddie - your >skill set, mebbe, level) I learned to program by writing actual legit >stuff, long before. Darling, I was writing complete computer games, and utilities in assembler before you were writing your tiny weenie viruses. Larf. >Real 'coders' have a signature/style of code. The world is full of hundreds of thousands of programmers. Do you really think you stand out. Larf. > It wasn't too damn >difficult to spot that signature if you had previous knowledge of my >legit stuff. If you were into the crypto/freeware scenes, you did. >So... Yea... > >You said I've had many nyms, but, I haven't. Raid is an old nym, but, >well known and respected and/or still feared by many. rofl. Dunno >why, I'm long since retired... reputation I suppose. > >And btw, who wouldn't deny (atleast in public rofl) being who they >were while their stuff was spreading like an out of control wildfire >on a global basis? I don't have 'idiot' tattooed on me, script >kiddie. So you lied then. You keep agreeing with me that you lied. We agree. You lied. >You said I was a troll, but, I'm not. :-) > >You lie and you bullshit, often/all the time. Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly. -- p-0.0-h the cat Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat, Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy, Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath, the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme, the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll, shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook, smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag, liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav, lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball. NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery. By Appointment to God Frank-Lin. Signature integrity check md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-16 08:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA591208BAC768F7D9A8@dieselpower.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #252323 |
"p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> news:41ni9bt2rtk8ss7ijq4hv1a2ddjsirb544@4ax.com Fri, 15 Jan 2016 21:02:37 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 20:30:03 -0000 (UTC), Diesel <me@privacy.net> > wrote: > >>"p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> >>news:mc0g9bdp0u1frq5t9qbg7r6c4q4c5p6lpq@4ax.com Thu, 14 Jan 2016 >>20:14:48 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:20:26 -0000 (UTC), Diesel >>> <me@privacy.net> wrote: >>> >>>>"p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" >>>><super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> >>>>news:og3363mj0cxz.ziedew6500a4$.dlg@40tude.net Thu, 14 Jan 2016 >>>>09:33:36 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 07:19:57 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" >>>>>> <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> >>>>>> news:1bu2y509yhj4y$.1jolgrtl8hj8g$.dlg@40tude.net Wed, 13 Jan >>>>>> 2016 20:51:06 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:44:43 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" >>>>>>>> <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> >>>>>>>> news:g2dncdv89yrb.jd02ak3ex7j2$.dlg@40tude.net Mon, 11 Jan >>>>>>>> 2016 09:41:35 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:50:46 -0500, Susan Bugher wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2016 5:22 PM, Diesel wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>>>>> news:dfflu9F69d8U1@mid.individual.net Sun, 10 Jan 2016 >>>>>>>>>>> 18:25:37 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2016 12:00 AM, Diesel wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:dfagkdFr7ucU1@mid.individual.net Fri, 08 Jan 2016 >>>>>>>>>>>>> 19:24:17 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want to prevent communication issues in future >>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts, I suggest you stop looking in the wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>> direction (Linux vs. Windiows) and focus on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> furnishing *adequate* information to identifiy the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> specific problem file or files.you're posting about. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I already stated that I'd obviously made an error by >>>>>>>>>>>>> not specifically mentioning it was the Windows >>>>>>>>>>>>> English-US binaries I was hunting for. I figured the >>>>>>>>>>>>> news reader I use/previous discussions I've taken part >>>>>>>>>>>>> in (few having anything to do with linux) would have >>>>>>>>>>>>> made the OS binaries (perhaps not the language) >>>>>>>>>>>>> obvious. I realize that was a gross error on my part >>>>>>>>>>>>> and I shouldn't make any such assumptions in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> future. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> As far as linux vs windows and looking in the wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>> direction, I don't know what you mean by the >>>>>>>>>>>>> statement. I'm fairly neutral as far as the OS wars >>>>>>>>>>>>> topics go... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I meant that your definition of the communication issue >>>>>>>>>>>> was wrong. Linux vs. Windows was immaterial. The same >>>>>>>>>>>> type of problem can occur with Windows only programs. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Is still broken. If you try to download the Windows >>>>>>>>>>> English-US versions, you will be provided the WRONG >>>>>>>>>>> binary - confirmed again as of writing this post. It >>>>>>>>>>> never had anything to do with a bad cache on my end, and >>>>>>>>>>> it *did not* work either time I mentioned the issue. >>>>>>>>>>> It's still *not* working. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It's known by many regulars that I'm based in the USA, >>>>>>>>>>> so logically, I would have been trying to download >>>>>>>>>>> Windows english-US firefox from the url above, that I >>>>>>>>>>> mentioned, days ago, wasn't working properly. It's >>>>>>>>>>> really not a hard stretch on this. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A theoritical example : >>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/irfanview.html> >>>>>>>>>>>> There are three download links on the web page. In >>>>>>>>>>>> theory they all produce the same file. If you get the >>>>>>>>>>>> wrong file from ONE of those links that does not mean >>>>>>>>>>>> you can assume the other two links will also produce >>>>>>>>>>>> the wrong file. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The links offered on the mozilla site are not supposed >>>>>>>>>>> to offer the 'same' file for all download links. Some >>>>>>>>>>> are clearly intended for non Windows OS. your example >>>>>>>>>>> doesn't really fit in this case. It's the english-US >>>>>>>>>>> firefox for windows links that remain broken on >>>>>>>>>>> Mozilla's end. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> FWIW I actually ran into the *one* bad file case on >>>>>>>>>>>> Major Geeks once (different program whose name I don't >>>>>>>>>>>> recall). I emailed them, they checked and fixed thI >>>>>>>>>>>> properly >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I seriously doubt i'm the only user who's tried to >>>>>>>>>>> download the English-US versions of Windows Firefox from >>>>>>>>>>> the aforementioned url only to be provided v43.0.1. It's >>>>>>>>>>> been doing this since 43.0.2 was released as a matter of >>>>>>>>>>> fact. So I'm not thinking an email from me would be >>>>>>>>>>> necessary at this point. They have to know somethings >>>>>>>>>>> wrong already. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You said "your example doesn't really fit in this case" >>>>>>>>>> while I think it fits very well. That makes it EOT time >>>>>>>>>> for me. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> HAND >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Susan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Well spanked Susan. Diesel [Dusty, Dustin, Slam and many >>>>>>>>> other nyms] is a nasty misogynist troll. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't know Dusty. I've never used any such nym. It's a >>>>>>>> pet name you've decided to use because you can't reasonably >>>>>>>> defend your side of the argument concerning some >>>>>>>> discussions we've had. You don't appreciate logic and >>>>>>>> reason. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> SLAM isn't a nym. It was (long since disbanded) a pro VX >>>>>>>> group. I've had very few nyms, actually. And, unlike >>>>>>>> yourself, I've never attemped to hide/mask my identity >>>>>>>> while using one. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Liar, liar, pants on fire. >>>>>> >>>>>> Be specific. What are you accusing me of lying about? >>>>>> >>>>>> If you're trying for the nym Raid during my pro vx days, >>>>>> you're *really* stretching. >>>>> >>>>> So you admit you are lying then. Larf. >>>> >>>>ROFL >>>> >>>>Jessalyn, that's a piss poor excuse for an answer to my >>>>question. >>>> >>>>I know.. I know, you haven't got anything to backup your >>>>accusation. I still like to watch you squirm and dance though. >>>>It's good cardio for you, and, heh, you aren't exactly over >>>>worked in that dept. [g] >>>> >>> >>> Here's RAID denying he's Dustin Cook. > > Link reinstated > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.comp.anti-virus/IYMT49F > hzF4 > >>Ahem.. *rofl* > > Yo said I didn't have anything to back up my accusation. I've > reinstated the link. ROFL back at ya! You don't. You said SLAM (proper!) was a nym. It isn't. You said I had many nyms. Raid is your attempt to deflect from being corrected, again, so easily. The link is fine. [g] It's not exactly a 'secret' these days, script kiddie. >>As I previously stated: >> >>If you're trying for the nym Raid during my pro vx days, you're >>*really* stretching. > > It was easy Dusty. No stretching was involved. You are stretching. See above. [g] >>some Avers knew me by first and last name despite the public and >>official denial posts. [g] <-- I had legit keys from some of them >>with a little deal I worked out... rofl. You don't need to know >>the specific details, you only needed to know they already knew me >>and the majority of the posturing on acv was a show. (Oh wait, >>Didn't some others express that opinion? Yes, yes they did. lol) >> >>Morons like you, thought it was how things are. Everyone else knew >>we weren't 'anonymous' and weren't that difficult to communicate >>with, if one wanted to do so. >> >>I wasn't always writing viruses (real viruses, not the horseshit >>that's passing for malware theses days. trivial script kiddie - >>your skill set, mebbe, level) I learned to program by writing >>actual legit stuff, long before. > > Darling, I was writing complete computer games, and utilities in > assembler before you were writing your tiny weenie viruses. > Larf. Honey, I don't believe you. [g] You haven't demonstrated any concept of proper code layout or programming to be able to support that silly claim. Besides, I freely shared some simple as hell assembler sources with ray lopez to fuck with him a bit, and, I heard crickets from you. It wasn't until I forked over some ASIC source that you demonstrated your 'coding' abilities. And, hell, most of the regulars know how well that worked out for you. [BFG] And, let's not forget, it took you DAYS to reverse a hex text message I wrote to tease David Brooks with. What assembler coder, or any actual coder for that matter, doesn't recognize HEXADECIMAL the second they see some of it? Answer: A script kiddie. IE: You. I tested you a bit more, I provided another little teaser in AZ; I plainly told you it's based on the HEX concept, just homebrew. I've even provided the source code and a pseudo layout of the algorithm. You've consistently FAILED to reverse any of the AZ posts for anyone. It wouldn't matter a bit if you could manage to do it now, you have the compiler and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to copy paste an old post of mine. [g] Fact is, you haven't done it, so far, and, that tells the real story concerning your totally bullshit story about being a coder of ANY kind. >>Real 'coders' have a signature/style of code. > > The world is full of hundreds of thousands of programmers. Do you > really think you stand out. Larf. ROFL. Your ignorant comment needs no reply from me. :) >> It wasn't too damn >>difficult to spot that signature if you had previous knowledge of >>my legit stuff. If you were into the crypto/freeware scenes, you >>did. So... Yea... >> >>You said I've had many nyms, but, I haven't. Raid is an old nym, >>but, well known and respected and/or still feared by many. rofl. >>Dunno why, I'm long since retired... reputation I suppose. >> >>And btw, who wouldn't deny (atleast in public rofl) being who they >>were while their stuff was spreading like an out of control >>wildfire on a global basis? I don't have 'idiot' tattooed on me, >>script kiddie. > > So you lied then. You keep agreeing with me that you lied. We > agree. You lied. I already covered Raid. [g] And, Raid wasn't doing much lying when the very people who I corresponded with most of the time also had dealings with me off of usenet where we all used our real names. ROFL. More background information I waited to share until you locked in an answer. [g] I'm such an asshole sometimes. What's worse (for you) various individuals who do post here can vouch for every single thing I've written concerning this. h0h0h0, the jokes on YOU, Honey. So again, let's go over your most recent claims that you haven't a snowballs chance in hell of supporting: SLAM (proper, mmm'k!) is/was a nym. It isn't/It wasn't. I've have/had many nyms. I don't/I didn't. Why no comment concerning the thread I created, pooh? [g] Oh.. wait.. you haven't said a fucking thing about any of my questions concerning my cache... or even question my findings.. why might that be, pooh? I thought you said I was a network moron? ROFL... The only fucking you seem to be getting is that via usenet. Go ahead, keep writing total horse shit, Jessalyn. I'll oblige your request. -- Hey listen... On your way back up, bring some popcorn...With salt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-16 09:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vd1k9bdqn0kv9li309smjcbikfqfl4lgdf@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #252348 |
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 08:03:47 -0000 (UTC), Diesel <me@privacy.net> wrote: >"p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> >news:41ni9bt2rtk8ss7ijq4hv1a2ddjsirb544@4ax.com Fri, 15 Jan 2016 >21:02:37 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: > >> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 20:30:03 -0000 (UTC), Diesel <me@privacy.net> >> wrote: >> >>>"p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> >>>news:mc0g9bdp0u1frq5t9qbg7r6c4q4c5p6lpq@4ax.com Thu, 14 Jan 2016 >>>20:14:48 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:20:26 -0000 (UTC), Diesel >>>> <me@privacy.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>"p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" >>>>><super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> >>>>>news:og3363mj0cxz.ziedew6500a4$.dlg@40tude.net Thu, 14 Jan 2016 >>>>>09:33:36 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 07:19:57 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" >>>>>>> <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> >>>>>>> news:1bu2y509yhj4y$.1jolgrtl8hj8g$.dlg@40tude.net Wed, 13 Jan >>>>>>> 2016 20:51:06 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:44:43 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" >>>>>>>>> <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> >>>>>>>>> news:g2dncdv89yrb.jd02ak3ex7j2$.dlg@40tude.net Mon, 11 Jan >>>>>>>>> 2016 09:41:35 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:50:46 -0500, Susan Bugher wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2016 5:22 PM, Diesel wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> news:dfflu9F69d8U1@mid.individual.net Sun, 10 Jan 2016 >>>>>>>>>>>> 18:25:37 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2016 12:00 AM, Diesel wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:dfagkdFr7ucU1@mid.individual.net Fri, 08 Jan 2016 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19:24:17 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want to prevent communication issues in future >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts, I suggest you stop looking in the wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> direction (Linux vs. Windiows) and focus on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> furnishing *adequate* information to identifiy the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specific problem file or files.you're posting about. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already stated that I'd obviously made an error by >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not specifically mentioning it was the Windows >>>>>>>>>>>>>> English-US binaries I was hunting for. I figured the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news reader I use/previous discussions I've taken part >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in (few having anything to do with linux) would have >>>>>>>>>>>>>> made the OS binaries (perhaps not the language) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> obvious. I realize that was a gross error on my part >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I shouldn't make any such assumptions in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> future. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As far as linux vs windows and looking in the wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>> direction, I don't know what you mean by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> statement. I'm fairly neutral as far as the OS wars >>>>>>>>>>>>>> topics go... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I meant that your definition of the communication issue >>>>>>>>>>>>> was wrong. Linux vs. Windows was immaterial. The same >>>>>>>>>>>>> type of problem can occur with Windows only programs. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Is still broken. If you try to download the Windows >>>>>>>>>>>> English-US versions, you will be provided the WRONG >>>>>>>>>>>> binary - confirmed again as of writing this post. It >>>>>>>>>>>> never had anything to do with a bad cache on my end, and >>>>>>>>>>>> it *did not* work either time I mentioned the issue. >>>>>>>>>>>> It's still *not* working. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It's known by many regulars that I'm based in the USA, >>>>>>>>>>>> so logically, I would have been trying to download >>>>>>>>>>>> Windows english-US firefox from the url above, that I >>>>>>>>>>>> mentioned, days ago, wasn't working properly. It's >>>>>>>>>>>> really not a hard stretch on this. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> A theoritical example : >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/irfanview.html> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There are three download links on the web page. In >>>>>>>>>>>>> theory they all produce the same file. If you get the >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong file from ONE of those links that does not mean >>>>>>>>>>>>> you can assume the other two links will also produce >>>>>>>>>>>>> the wrong file. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The links offered on the mozilla site are not supposed >>>>>>>>>>>> to offer the 'same' file for all download links. Some >>>>>>>>>>>> are clearly intended for non Windows OS. your example >>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't really fit in this case. It's the english-US >>>>>>>>>>>> firefox for windows links that remain broken on >>>>>>>>>>>> Mozilla's end. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> FWIW I actually ran into the *one* bad file case on >>>>>>>>>>>>> Major Geeks once (different program whose name I don't >>>>>>>>>>>>> recall). I emailed them, they checked and fixed thI >>>>>>>>>>>>> properly >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I seriously doubt i'm the only user who's tried to >>>>>>>>>>>> download the English-US versions of Windows Firefox from >>>>>>>>>>>> the aforementioned url only to be provided v43.0.1. It's >>>>>>>>>>>> been doing this since 43.0.2 was released as a matter of >>>>>>>>>>>> fact. So I'm not thinking an email from me would be >>>>>>>>>>>> necessary at this point. They have to know somethings >>>>>>>>>>>> wrong already. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You said "your example doesn't really fit in this case" >>>>>>>>>>> while I think it fits very well. That makes it EOT time >>>>>>>>>>> for me. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> HAND >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Susan >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Well spanked Susan. Diesel [Dusty, Dustin, Slam and many >>>>>>>>>> other nyms] is a nasty misogynist troll. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't know Dusty. I've never used any such nym. It's a >>>>>>>>> pet name you've decided to use because you can't reasonably >>>>>>>>> defend your side of the argument concerning some >>>>>>>>> discussions we've had. You don't appreciate logic and >>>>>>>>> reason. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> SLAM isn't a nym. It was (long since disbanded) a pro VX >>>>>>>>> group. I've had very few nyms, actually. And, unlike >>>>>>>>> yourself, I've never attemped to hide/mask my identity >>>>>>>>> while using one. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Liar, liar, pants on fire. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Be specific. What are you accusing me of lying about? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you're trying for the nym Raid during my pro vx days, >>>>>>> you're *really* stretching. >>>>>> >>>>>> So you admit you are lying then. Larf. >>>>> >>>>>ROFL >>>>> >>>>>Jessalyn, that's a piss poor excuse for an answer to my >>>>>question. >>>>> >>>>>I know.. I know, you haven't got anything to backup your >>>>>accusation. I still like to watch you squirm and dance though. >>>>>It's good cardio for you, and, heh, you aren't exactly over >>>>>worked in that dept. [g] >>>>> >>>> >>>> Here's RAID denying he's Dustin Cook. >> >> Link reinstated >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.comp.anti-virus/IYMT49F >> hzF4 >> >>>Ahem.. *rofl* >> >> Yo said I didn't have anything to back up my accusation. I've >> reinstated the link. ROFL back at ya! > >You don't. You said SLAM (proper!) was a nym. It isn't. You said I >had many nyms. Raid is your attempt to deflect from being corrected, >again, so easily. The link is fine. [g] It's not exactly a 'secret' >these days, script kiddie. > >>>As I previously stated: >>> >>>If you're trying for the nym Raid during my pro vx days, you're >>>*really* stretching. >> >> It was easy Dusty. No stretching was involved. > >You are stretching. See above. [g] > >>>some Avers knew me by first and last name despite the public and >>>official denial posts. [g] <-- I had legit keys from some of them >>>with a little deal I worked out... rofl. You don't need to know >>>the specific details, you only needed to know they already knew me >>>and the majority of the posturing on acv was a show. (Oh wait, >>>Didn't some others express that opinion? Yes, yes they did. lol) >>> >>>Morons like you, thought it was how things are. Everyone else knew >>>we weren't 'anonymous' and weren't that difficult to communicate >>>with, if one wanted to do so. >>> >>>I wasn't always writing viruses (real viruses, not the horseshit >>>that's passing for malware theses days. trivial script kiddie - >>>your skill set, mebbe, level) I learned to program by writing >>>actual legit stuff, long before. >> >> Darling, I was writing complete computer games, and utilities in >> assembler before you were writing your tiny weenie viruses. >> Larf. > >Honey, I don't believe you. [g] Like I care. >You haven't demonstrated any concept of proper code layout or >programming to be able to support that silly claim. Besides, I freely >shared some simple as hell assembler sources with ray lopez to fuck >with him a bit, and, I heard crickets from you. It wasn't until I >forked over some ASIC source that you demonstrated your 'coding' >abilities. And, hell, most of the regulars know how well that worked >out for you. [BFG] Most of the regulars know jack shit about programming Dusty so that's just a stupid comment. >And, let's not forget, it took you DAYS to reverse a hex text message You seem to be under some illusion that I even tried. Why would I bother. >I wrote to tease David Brooks with. What assembler coder, or any >actual coder for that matter, doesn't recognize HEXADECIMAL the >second they see some of it? Answer: A script kiddie. IE: You. I don't read all the love spats between you and BD. Larf. They are just pathetic to watch. >I tested you a bit more, I provided another little teaser in AZ; I >plainly told you it's based on the HEX concept, just homebrew. I've >even provided the source code and a pseudo layout of the algorithm. >You've consistently FAILED to reverse any of the AZ posts for anyone. Why would I waste a second on that. >It wouldn't matter a bit if you could manage to do it now, you have >the compiler and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to copy paste an >old post of mine. [g] Fact is, you haven't done it, so far, and, that >tells the real story concerning your totally bullshit story about >being a coder of ANY kind. Yeah, that's the defining test. No doubt about it. WTF. >>>Real 'coders' have a signature/style of code. >> >> The world is full of hundreds of thousands of programmers. Do you >> really think you stand out. Larf. > >ROFL. Your ignorant comment needs no reply from me. :) Yeah, well how many programmers do you think programmed Windows and contributed to Linux, GNU, BSD, Mac OS, all the mobile OS's, all the hardware devices like Cisco OS, and so on and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... and on... Was all that done in ASIC? Ha Ha. >>> It wasn't too damn >>>difficult to spot that signature if you had previous knowledge of >>>my legit stuff. If you were into the crypto/freeware scenes, you >>>did. So... Yea... >>> >>>You said I've had many nyms, but, I haven't. Raid is an old nym, >>>but, well known and respected and/or still feared by many. rofl. >>>Dunno why, I'm long since retired... reputation I suppose. >>> >>>And btw, who wouldn't deny (atleast in public rofl) being who they >>>were while their stuff was spreading like an out of control >>>wildfire on a global basis? I don't have 'idiot' tattooed on me, >>>script kiddie. >> >> So you lied then. You keep agreeing with me that you lied. We >> agree. You lied. > >I already covered Raid. [g] So you lied then, and I was right as usual. > And, Raid wasn't doing much lying when >the very people who I corresponded with most of the time also had >dealings with me off of usenet where we all used our real names. >ROFL. > >More background information I waited to share until you locked in an >answer. [g] I'm such an asshole sometimes. What's worse (for you) >various individuals who do post here can vouch for every single thing >I've written concerning this. > >h0h0h0, the jokes on YOU, Honey. > >So again, let's go over your most recent claims that you haven't a >snowballs chance in hell of supporting: > >SLAM (proper, mmm'k!) is/was a nym. It isn't/It wasn't. >I've have/had many nyms. I don't/I didn't. > >Why no comment concerning the thread I created, pooh? [g] Oh.. wait.. >you haven't said a fucking thing about any of my questions concerning >my cache... or even question my findings.. why might that be, pooh? I >thought you said I was a network moron? ROFL... Eh! Susan pointed out the redirection wasn't working correctly. What has that got to do with your cache. Larf. >The only fucking you seem to be getting is that via usenet. Go ahead, >keep writing total horse shit, Jessalyn. I'll oblige your request. Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly. -- p-0.0-h the cat Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat, Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy, Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath, the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme, the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll, shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook, smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag, liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav, lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball. NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery. By Appointment to God Frank-Lin. Signature integrity check md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-16 22:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA591B389E3280F7D9A8@dieselpower.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #252349 |
"p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> news:vd1k9bdqn0kv9li309smjcbikfqfl4lgdf@4ax.com Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:13:16 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: [big snip] >>You haven't demonstrated any concept of proper code layout or >>programming to be able to support that silly claim. Besides, I >>freely shared some simple as hell assembler sources with ray lopez >>to fuck with him a bit, and, I heard crickets from you. It wasn't >>until I forked over some ASIC source that you demonstrated your >>'coding' abilities. And, hell, most of the regulars know how well >>that worked out for you. [BFG] > > Most of the regulars know jack shit about programming Dusty so > that's just a stupid comment. ROFL. Some of the regulars OTH, know a considerable amount about programming; and, those particular regulars commented on your.. ahem, shall we say, piss poor coding demonstrations? ROFL. >>And, let's not forget, it took you DAYS to reverse a hex text >>message > > You seem to be under some illusion that I even tried. Why would I > bother. You did try. You used an online site to convert it for you, once you realized what it was. A coder wouldn't have needed any measurable amount of time to know what hex was when they viewed it. Plain as day to anyone who actually has the skills you've lied about having. >>I wrote to tease David Brooks with. What assembler coder, or any >>actual coder for that matter, doesn't recognize HEXADECIMAL the >>second they see some of it? Answer: A script kiddie. IE: You. > > I don't read all the love spats between you and BD. Larf. They are > just pathetic to watch. The deflection effort is only worthy of a c- grade. You must try harder. >>I tested you a bit more, I provided another little teaser in AZ; I >>plainly told you it's based on the HEX concept, just homebrew. >>I've even provided the source code and a pseudo layout of the >>algorithm. You've consistently FAILED to reverse any of the AZ >>posts for anyone. > > Why would I waste a second on that. You wasted the time, days later, to decode something I wrote for BD. [g] you've backed away from the AZ posts because you can't find a site online to do the conversion for you. You'd have to do it. ROFL. And, since you're nothing more than a script kiddie, you're finding the task above you. Muahaha. >>>>Real 'coders' have a signature/style of code. >>> >>> The world is full of hundreds of thousands of programmers. Do >>> you really think you stand out. Larf. >> >>ROFL. Your ignorant comment needs no reply from me. :) > > Yeah, well [snip total deflection] ROFL. Seriously, as I said, real coders do have a signature. If that particular coder has released code that's known and used under his/her real name and later releases some malicious code, that turned darkside coders identity can be determined. Signature, stupid. It's a hard habit to break. It's already happened several times. I can think of a few specific VX related cases off the top of my head, excluding myself. Although, I could easily include myself if I wanted. An ancient kit I wrote was kept by a sadistic Av researcher. When I started releasing actual self replicating code, he kept copies. He reverse engineered them, reverse engineered the previous toolkit.. And due to a suspicion (I told you, some Avers already knew me on a real name basis off usenet) downloaded some legit stuff, published years earlier and reverse engineered them as well. Those programs won four out of five stars on zdnet; routinely! five stars declined for poor documentation in all cases. ROFL. I can provide names of the programs and in some cases, copies of the zdnet email and website publication reviews, so you can verify my claims and, wish they weren't true, and, decide how best to deflect from this mess you've put yourself in, again. He was able to compare the code in all test samples and discovered the coding style was the same. IE: the same individual most likely is responsible for having written ALL of the samples. From the legit software, to the toolkit, to the actual binary virus sample. Same person is responsible for all of them, or, some code sharing has taken place. Since source code wasn't available for any of the three samples (because I typically wouldn't publish code).. if it's not the same person writing all three samples, the individual knows in person who did write atleast one and has copied his/her work for the other two, to the letter. Not impossible, but, highly unlikely. lol Factor in the time differences between programs publications, it's factored again, to being most likely, the same individual having written all three. IE: started writing this, went to writing that, learned how to write self replicating code shortly after writing the second sample set. This is another reason that I know you're full of shit when you claim to be a coder. You don't know this stuff, and, coders do! Just like a bomb maker knows anyone who studies his work is going to know he built this or that bomb. He has a way he goes about doing it. That way is a habit. He doesn't even realize he's doing it. Btw, Hackers typically have a signature too, and, unless they're script kiddie grade, they know this and carefully consider that when they're upto something that might come back to bite them in the ass. > Was all that done in ASIC? Ha Ha. Nope. What's exevalid do again? ROFL. The name sort of provides the answer. *big clue* hahahha >>More background information I waited to share until you locked in >>an answer. [g] I'm such an asshole sometimes. What's worse (for >>you) various individuals who do post here can vouch for every >>single thing I've written concerning this. >> >>h0h0h0, the jokes on YOU, Honey. >> >>So again, let's go over your most recent claims that you haven't a >>snowballs chance in hell of supporting: >> >>SLAM (proper, mmm'k!) is/was a nym. It isn't/It wasn't. >>I've have/had many nyms. I don't/I didn't. >> >>Why no comment concerning the thread I created, pooh? [g] Oh.. >>wait.. you haven't said a fucking thing about any of my questions >>concerning my cache... or even question my findings.. why might >>that be, pooh? I thought you said I was a network moron? ROFL... > > Eh! Susan pointed out the redirection wasn't working correctly. > What has that got to do with your cache. Larf. Nope. *I* pointed out the url isn't pointing to the correct binary in two threads, this being the second one... Several others questioned my findings, and, Susan, was able to confirm them and provide information I initially neglected to mention (the windows english-us binaries are pointing to the wrong url) (this is the post which created the thread): MID: <XnsA582225E94165F7D9A8@dieselpower.eternal-september.org> Do try and keep up, Jenn... >>The only fucking you seem to be getting is that via usenet. Go >>ahead, keep writing total horse shit, Jessalyn. I'll oblige your >>request. > > Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly. Like I said.. ROFL! -- Hey listen... On your way back up, bring some popcorn...With salt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-17 00:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <12xat5p31xfcm.cosnxi80doxj.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #252411 |
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 22:30:54 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: > Like I said.. Sad Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly. -- p-0.0-h the cat Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat, Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy, Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath, the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme, the OVERCAT[The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll, shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook, smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag, liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav, lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball. NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery. By Appointment to God Frank-Lin. Signature integrity check md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-17 00:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA591C8DE8759CF7D9A8@dieselpower.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #252435 |
"p-0''0-h the cat (UK) - The voice of the Sheeple" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> news:12xat5p31xfcm.cosnxi80doxj.dlg@ 40tude.net Sun, 17 Jan 2016 00:35:38 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 22:30:54 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: > >> Like I said.. > > Sad It's sad that you still can't answer a simple question. :) What's exevalid do? ROFL. Jessalyn, be honest with yourself. Admit you're a wannabe. You'll feel better. <BFG> -- Hey listen... On your way back up, bring some popcorn...With salt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-13 20:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA58EA1734BA0EF7D9A8@dieselpower.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #252047 |
Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> news:dfgcgdFbrjkU1@mid.individual.net Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:50:46 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: > On 1/10/2016 5:22 PM, Diesel wrote: >> Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> >> news:dfflu9F69d8U1@mid.individual.net Sun, 10 Jan 2016 18:25:37 >> GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: >>> On 1/10/2016 12:00 AM, Diesel wrote: >>>> Susan Bugher <sebugher@yahoo.com> >>>> news:dfagkdFr7ucU1@mid.individual.net Fri, 08 Jan 2016 19:24:17 >>>> GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: > >>>>> If you want to prevent communication issues in future posts, I >>>>> suggest you stop looking in the wrong direction (Linux vs. >>>>> Windiows) and focus on furnishing *adequate* information to >>>>> identifiy the specific problem file or files.you're posting >>>>> about. >>>> >>>> I already stated that I'd obviously made an error by not >>>> specifically mentioning it was the Windows English-US binaries >>>> I was hunting for. I figured the news reader I use/previous >>>> discussions I've taken part in (few having anything to do with >>>> linux) would have made the OS binaries (perhaps not the >>>> language) obvious. I realize that was a gross error on my part >>>> and I shouldn't make any such assumptions in the future. >>>> >>>> As far as linux vs windows and looking in the wrong direction, >>>> I don't know what you mean by the statement. I'm fairly neutral >>>> as far as the OS wars topics go... >>> >>> I meant that your definition of the communication issue was >>> wrong. Linux vs. Windows was immaterial. The same type of >>> problem can occur with Windows only programs. >> >> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/ >> >> Is still broken. If you try to download the Windows English-US >> versions, you will be provided the WRONG binary - confirmed again >> as of writing this post. It never had anything to do with a bad >> cache on my end, and it *did not* work either time I mentioned >> the issue. It's still *not* working. >> >> It's known by many regulars that I'm based in the USA, so >> logically, I would have been trying to download Windows >> english-US firefox from the url above, that I mentioned, days >> ago, wasn't working properly. It's really not a hard stretch on >> this. >> >>> A theoritical example : >>> <http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/irfanview.html> >>> There are three download links on the web page. In theory they >>> all produce the same file. If you get the wrong file from ONE of >>> those links that does not mean you can assume the other two >>> links will also produce the wrong file. >> >> The links offered on the mozilla site are not supposed to offer >> the 'same' file for all download links. Some are clearly intended >> for non Windows OS. your example doesn't really fit in this case. >> It's the english-US firefox for windows links that remain broken >> on Mozilla's end. >> >>> FWIW I actually ran into the *one* bad file case on Major Geeks >>> once (different program whose name I don't recall). I emailed >>> them, they checked and fixed thI properly >> >> I seriously doubt i'm the only user who's tried to download the >> English-US versions of Windows Firefox from the aforementioned >> url only to be provided v43.0.1. It's been doing this since >> 43.0.2 was released as a matter of fact. So I'm not thinking an >> email from me would be necessary at this point. They have to know >> somethings wrong already. > > You said "your example doesn't really fit in this case" while I > think it fits very well. That makes it EOT time for me. I understand. Thanks for voicing your opinion on the subject and checking my posted issue out. Although we disagree, I do respect the way you presented your side of the argument. > Susan Have a good one! -- Hey listen... On your way back up, bring some popcorn...With salt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.comp.freeware
csiph-web