Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.freeware > #252336 > unrolled thread
| Started by | John Corliss <q34wsk20@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-15 19:01 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-01-23 07:49 -0500 |
| Articles | 9 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.comp.freeware
(OT) Skylake users given 18 months to upgrade to Windows 10 John Corliss <q34wsk20@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-15 19:01 -0800
Re: (OT) Skylake users given 18 months to upgrade to Windows 10 Flasherly <Flasherly@live.com> - 2016-01-15 23:10 -0500
Re: (OT) Skylake users given 18 months to upgrade to Windows 10 JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-01-16 12:13 +0700
Re: (OT) Skylake users given 18 months to upgrade to Windows 10 Flasherly <Flasherly@live.com> - 2016-01-16 00:59 -0500
Re: (OT) Skylake users given 18 months to upgrade to Windows 10 Mark Warner <mhwarner.inhibitions@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 09:34 -0500
Re: (OT) Skylake users given 18 months to upgrade to Windows 10 Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-01-16 13:20 -0200
Re: (OT) Skylake users given 18 months to upgrade to Windows 10 Flasherly <Flasherly@live.com> - 2016-01-16 19:15 -0500
Re: (OT) Skylake users given 18 months to upgrade to Windows 10 Mark Warner <mhwarner.inhibitions@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 19:42 -0500
Re: (OT) Skylake users given 18 months to upgrade to Windows 10 Dewey Edwards <deweye@gSTRINGmail.com> - 2016-01-23 07:49 -0500
| From | John Corliss <q34wsk20@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-15 19:01 -0800 |
| Subject | (OT) Skylake users given 18 months to upgrade to Windows 10 |
| Message-ID | <n7cbkl$514$1@dont-email.me> |
Read about it here: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/01/skylake-users-given-18-months-to-upgrade-to-windows-10/ Comments to this article are here: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/01/skylake-users-given-18-months-to-upgrade-to-windows-10/?comments=1 The word "trust" comes clearly to mind here, as in "A consortium of independent organizations formed to limit competition by controlling the production and distribution of a product or service." I notice that no mention of Linux is given in the article. -- John Corliss BS206. No ad, CD, commercial, cripple, demo, nag, share, spy, time-limited, trial or web wares. No warez for me either please: just freeware -which I define as legally obtainable, local install or portable computer programs that can be used indefinitely at no cost, monetary or otherwise. I filter out any messages to this newsgroup which come from Google Groups and recommend that you do likewise. Voting is the opiate of the people.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Flasherly <Flasherly@live.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-15 23:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <v8gj9b10un2fg6h4ubimphtpm0203k9n2k@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #252336 |
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:01:03 -0800, John Corliss <q34wsk20@yahoo.com> wrote: >I notice that no mention of Linux is given in the article. *NIX is just a scab living off directions and movements the hard/software industry per force cohabit for a means of making a living [living for idealistic capitalism is a fortune permitted within facilitative regulatory standards and agencies];- ipso facto, so strictly and utilitarian or nonprofit alternative, as a freeware *NIX OS, therefore must pickup the crumbs leftover for adapting to those changes as they occur.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-16 12:13 +0700 |
| Message-ID | <tntxmyfbnych$.1amwv9ljspb8r.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #252336 |
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:01:03 -0800, John Corliss wrote: > Read about it here: > > http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/01/skylake-users-given-18-months-to-upgrade-to-windows-10/ > > Comments to this article are here: > > http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/01/skylake-users-given-18-months-to-upgrade-to-windows-10/?comments=1 > > The word "trust" comes clearly to mind here, as in "A consortium of > independent organizations formed to limit competition by controlling the > production and distribution of a product or service." > > I notice that no mention of Linux is given in the article. Upgrade to Windows 10 or else?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Flasherly <Flasherly@live.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-16 00:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mdlj9blqkvnmhcaeq89ucohvu3hvirtb2d@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #252343 |
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 12:13:30 +0700, JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> wrote: >Upgrade to Windows 10 or else? Of course not. There's nothing hardcoded into an Intel MPU by Microsoft and Windows 10;- stretching monopolization policies only goes so far before the boundaries of evident "fair play" begin to take upon populist vestiges of a Machiavellian down spin, one which Microsoft is most certainly no stranger to in national courts of law spanning culture as it embodies wider globalization. What surprised me (in the article) is that USB3 is not yet implemented by Windows 7 (but a faux Win8.1 if not proper 10). I wonder how it is that veritable logical manifestations, (id est zeros and ones), a manifest wonder of consequence imparted to our glorious technological age, could be reduced to so simplistic a formulae only for Intel and Microsoft to guide the pathways permitted from Pacific Rim.manufacturers of motherboards. Short of the invention of copyrights, I'm stupefied, dumbfounded and thunderstruck by the past years, given what course increasingly for computers and services are permitted within an interoperability never before seen by man except on WWW.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mark Warner <mhwarner.inhibitions@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-16 09:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dfv2nsF2u57U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #252336 |
On 01/15/2016 10:01 PM, John Corliss wrote: > > I notice that no mention of Linux is given in the article. Or AMD. -- Mark Warner MEPIS Linux Registered Linux User #415318 ...lose .inhibitions when replying
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shadow <Sh@dow.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-16 13:20 -0200 |
| Message-ID | <jqnk9bp1vabaej0qpn49tt3qlr68q8qtrj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #252364 |
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:34:36 -0500, Mark Warner <mhwarner.inhibitions@gmail.com> wrote: >On 01/15/2016 10:01 PM, John Corliss wrote: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/01/skylake-users-given-18-months-to-upgrade-to-windows-10/ >> >> I notice that no mention of Linux is given in the article. > >Or AMD. Reading glasses - quick: "Next generation processors, including Intel's "Kaby Lake", Qualcomm's 8996 (branded as Snapdragon 820), and AMD's "Bristol Ridge" APUs (which will use the company's Excavator architecture, not its brand new Zen arch) will only be supported on Windows 10." ;) []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Flasherly <Flasherly@live.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-16 19:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <k6ml9bhqsilln4a0fcn3r1osrijorsuii2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #252368 |
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:20:25 -0200, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote: >On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:34:36 -0500, Mark Warner ><mhwarner.inhibitions@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On 01/15/2016 10:01 PM, John Corliss wrote: > >http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/01/skylake-users-given-18-months-to-upgrade-to-windows-10/ >>> >>> I notice that no mention of Linux is given in the article. >> >>Or AMD. > > Reading glasses - quick: > >"Next generation processors, including Intel's "Kaby Lake", Qualcomm's >8996 (branded as Snapdragon 820), and AMD's "Bristol Ridge" APUs >(which will use the company's Excavator architecture, not its brand >new Zen arch) will only be supported on Windows 10." > ;) > []'s At least AMD MB drivers are available for some MBs -- not all and I don't know the percentages of those that do -- namely XP drivers;...not to incur the inevitable groans, but more pointedly that it's a bare minimum of W7 for any presently manufactured Intel-socketed MB. Long live AMD [famous last words]. Of course with software emulation as platform-based object to a virtual machine, there would be broader applicability across formal OS builds. A more expensive machine, for any practical approach, but the hardware [support for newest MB/CPU standards] and quality of the build would be deserving of an advanced skill likely present when setting one up, smoothly built to surpass present recidivist limits and separatist impositions for what one isn't then solely limited to, say at with Microsoft freehandedness or a *NIX paucity, i.e. to better draw across multiple resources [given within the VM] for the right tools, so to speak, for the right job.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mark Warner <mhwarner.inhibitions@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-16 19:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dg06bkFbv74U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #252368 |
On 01/16/2016 10:20 AM, Shadow wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:34:36 -0500, Mark Warner wrote: >> On 01/15/2016 10:01 PM, John Corliss wrote: >>> >>> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/01/skylake-users-given-18-months-to-upgrade-to-windows-10/ >>> >>> I notice that no mention of Linux is given in the article. >> >> Or AMD. > > Reading glasses - quick: > > "Next generation processors, including Intel's "Kaby Lake", Qualcomm's > 8996 (branded as Snapdragon 820), and AMD's "Bristol Ridge" APUs > (which will use the company's Excavator architecture, not its brand > new Zen arch) will only be supported on Windows 10." I hate it when that happens. -- Mark Warner MEPIS Linux Registered Linux User #415318 ...lose .inhibitions when replying
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dewey Edwards <deweye@gSTRINGmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-23 07:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <fdt6abtu8a4ak6t86cn3rpo048ac7ivqpc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #252336 |
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:01:03 -0800, John Corliss <q34wsk20@yahoo.com> wrote: >Read about it here: > >http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/01/skylake-users-given-18-months-to-upgrade-to-windows-10/ > >Comments to this article are here: > >http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/01/skylake-users-given-18-months-to-upgrade-to-windows-10/?comments=1 > >The word "trust" comes clearly to mind here, as in "A consortium of >independent organizations formed to limit competition by controlling the >production and distribution of a product or service." > >I notice that no mention of Linux is given in the article. Maybe skylake needs 18 months to upgrade. http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2016/01/intel-skylake-bug-causes-pcs-to-freeze-during-complex-workloads/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | alt.comp.freeware
csiph-web