Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.freeware > #257121 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-18 08:46 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-03-19 06:55 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 105 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.comp.freeware
Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-18 08:46 +0000
Re: Ports & Services deathby@snu-snu.com (Phillip J. Fry) - 2016-03-18 09:56 +0000
Re: Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-19 08:56 +0000
Re: Ports & Services deathby@snu-snu.com (Phillip J. Fry) - 2016-03-19 13:19 +0000
Re: Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-19 09:10 +0000
Re: Ports & Services deathby@snu-snu.com (Phillip J. Fry) - 2016-03-19 13:21 +0000
Re: Ports & Services Eagle <example@none.ho> - 2016-03-19 06:31 -0700
Re: Ports & Services burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-03-19 10:37 -0400
Re: Ports & Services eyes@wideshut.com (Sycho) - 2016-03-19 19:56 +0000
Re: Ports & Services Eagle <example@none.ho> - 2016-03-20 06:55 -0700
Re: Ports & Services eyes@wideshut.com (Sycho) - 2016-03-20 14:59 +0000
Re: Ports & Services Eagle <example@none.ho> - 2016-03-20 10:40 -0700
Re: Ports & Services eyes@wideshut.com (Sycho) - 2016-03-20 19:27 +0000
Re: Ports & Services Eagle <example@none.ho> - 2016-03-21 07:46 -0700
Re: Ports & Services burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-03-21 11:53 -0400
Re: Ports & Services eyes@wideshut.com (Sycho) - 2016-03-21 20:34 +0000
Re: Ports & Services burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-03-21 16:36 -0400
Re: Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-21 20:45 +0000
Re: Ports & Services burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-03-21 16:56 -0400
Re: Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-21 20:57 +0000
Re: Ports & Services burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-03-21 17:06 -0400
Re: Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-21 21:07 +0000
Re: Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-21 21:10 +0000
Re: Ports & Services burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-03-21 17:13 -0400
Re: Ports & Services burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-03-21 17:16 -0400
Where have you planted the bomb? "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-21 21:19 +0000
Re: Where have you planted the bomb? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-03-21 17:21 -0400
Re: Where have you planted the bomb? "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-21 21:22 +0000
Re: Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-21 21:13 +0000
Re: Ports & Services burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-03-21 17:18 -0400
Re: Ports & Services Eagle <example@none.ho> - 2016-03-22 06:15 -0700
Re: Ports & Services eyes@wideshut.com (Sycho) - 2016-03-22 17:04 +0000
Re: Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-22 20:41 +0000
Re: Ports & Services Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-22 16:12 -0600
Re: Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-22 23:13 +0000
Re: Ports & Services FrozenNorth <frozennorth.ask@gmale.com> - 2016-03-22 19:23 -0400
Re: Ports & Services Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-22 17:28 -0600
Re: Ports & Services Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-03-23 06:53 +0000
Re: Ports & Services Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-23 06:38 -0600
Re: Ports & Services Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-22 17:26 -0600
Re: Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-22 23:30 +0000
Re: Ports & Services Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-22 18:33 -0600
Re: Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-23 00:48 +0000
Re: Ports & Services Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-22 19:01 -0600
Re: Ports & Services eyes@wideshut.com (Sycho) - 2016-03-23 04:39 +0000
Re: Ports & Services Eagle <example@none.ho> - 2016-03-22 14:49 -0700
Re: Ports & Services eyes@wideshut.com (Sycho) - 2016-03-23 04:32 +0000
Re: Ports & Services burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-03-20 16:32 -0400
Re: Ports & Services "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 20:13 +0800
Re: Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-18 13:50 +0000
Re: Ports & Services burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-03-18 09:57 -0400
Re: Ports & Services "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 23:42 +0800
Re: Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-18 16:01 +0000
Re: [OT]Ports & Services Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-03-18 13:13 -0300
Re: [OT]Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-19 10:32 +0000
Re: [OT]Ports & Services burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-03-19 06:59 -0400
Re: [OT]Ports & Services eyes@wideshut.com (Sycho) - 2016-03-19 11:05 +0000
Re: [OT]Ports & Services burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-03-19 07:14 -0400
Re: [OT]Ports & Services Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-03-19 21:03 +0000
Re: [OT]Ports & Services Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-03-19 11:50 -0300
Re: [OT]Ports & Services Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-03-19 21:54 +0000
Re: [OT]Ports & Services eyes@wideshut.com (Sycho) - 2016-03-20 07:31 +0000
Re: [OT]Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-20 08:40 +0000
Re: [OT]Ports & Services burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-03-20 16:30 -0400
Re: [OT]Ports & Services SeaNymph <SeaNymph@deepbluesea.com> - 2016-03-19 18:41 -0500
Re: [OT]Ports & Services "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 16:54 -0700
Re: [OT]Ports & Services Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-03-20 10:53 +0000
Re: [OT]Ports & Services SeaNymph <SeaNymph@deepbluesea.com> - 2016-03-20 08:47 -0500
Re: [OT]Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-20 10:45 +0000
Re: [OT]Ports & Services burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-03-20 07:55 -0400
Re: [OT]Ports & Services SeaNymph <SeaNymph@deepbluesea.com> - 2016-03-20 08:48 -0500
Re: [OT]Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-20 16:47 +0000
Re: [OT]Ports & Services SeaNymph <SeaNymph@deepbluesea.com> - 2016-03-20 11:53 -0500
Re: [OT]Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-20 16:56 +0000
Re: [OT]Ports & Services FrozenNorth <frozennorth.ask@gmale.com> - 2016-03-20 12:58 -0400
Re: [OT]Ports & Services burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-03-20 16:28 -0400
Re: Ports & Services "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 00:34 +0800
Re: [OT]Ports & Services Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-03-18 13:45 -0300
Re: [OT]Ports & Services "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 01:21 +0800
Re: [OT]Ports & Services Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-03-18 13:38 -0300
Re: Ports & Services Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-03-18 13:01 -0300
Re: Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-18 16:11 +0000
Re: Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-18 16:18 +0000
Re: Ports & Services "The Spanish Inquisition" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2016-03-18 16:29 +0000
Re: Ports & Services "Clamidia Ramsbottom, Secretary, Woman's Institute, Walmington-on-Sea" <clam@coochie.invalid> - 2016-03-18 16:36 +0000
Re: [OT]Ports & Services Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-03-18 13:30 -0300
Re: [OT]Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-18 20:47 +0000
Re: Ports & Services "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 00:32 +0800
Re: Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-18 20:49 +0000
Re: Ports & Services FrozenNorth <frozennorth.ask@gmale.com> - 2016-03-18 17:05 -0400
Re: Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-18 21:25 +0000
Re: Ports & Services FrozenNorth <frozennorth.ask@gmale.com> - 2016-03-18 17:34 -0400
Re: Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-18 21:42 +0000
Re: Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-18 21:44 +0000
Re: Ports & Services burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-03-19 06:57 -0400
Re: [OT]Ports & Services Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-03-18 19:05 -0300
Re: [OT]Ports & Services "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2016-03-18 22:17 +0000
Re: [OT]Ports & Services Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-03-18 12:48 -0300
Re: [OT]Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-18 16:04 +0000
Re: [OT]Ports & Services burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-03-18 15:56 -0400
Re: Ports & Services "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 00:35 +0800
Re: Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-18 19:39 +0000
Re: [OT]Ports & Services Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-03-18 17:59 -0300
Re: [OT]Ports & Services "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-03-18 21:35 +0000
Re: [OT]Ports & Services burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-03-19 06:55 -0400
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 21:54 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ports & Services |
| Message-ID | <XnsA5D0B76BB5FCAF7D9A8@dieselpower.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #257238 |
"David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> news:ncj9ld$gcj$1@boaterdave.dont-email.me Sat, 19 Mar 2016 10:32:10 GMT in alt.politics.scorched-earth, wrote: > I've been around for a VERY long time, Shadow. ;-) Yet.. you've managed to learn nothing. How does an individual accomplish such a feet? > Here's a copy of a letter I sent to Graham Cluley about four years > ago:- > > https://www.grahamcluley.com/ (A good man!) He's a slimeball, much like yourself. No wonder you consider him to be a good guy. I know a lot! about Clueless cluley, David... He got busted (rofl) telling porkies to reporters about virus writers. Sophos muzzled his postings to usenet for awhile over it. He was also featured as a payload in a virus. Cluley mainly liked to run his mouth and try to 'catch' evil vxers. He'd try to blackmail them if he thought he knew their real identity. Sound familiar to your nonsense David? Did you learn those lame tactics by observing him? > As I had retired early, I decided that I would, indeed, > investigate malware and cybercrime and have spent thousands of > hours so doing. Quite fun really! I don't think it's fun, personally, to invest thousands of hours to learn something, and fail to do so. You have no useful knowledge of either subject at this time. You might want to consider the possibility that malware and cybercrime? (another buzzword.. gotta love em, good advertising material; no solid content) are subjects that you won't ever have a solid grasp on. Perhaps it's time for you to find something else that you can be productive in. > I happened across a certain Dustin Cook who took a dislike to me > looking for 'bad guys'. As our published email correspondence clearly shows, I did no such thing. You're lying. > To punish me, he has now used his involvement with The Pirate Bay > via his group known as HHI (Happy Hacker Industries) and has just > published my name, address and telephone number with his latest > release, here: http://thepiratebay.ee/torrent/7214617/Adele-21- As our published usenet correspondence clearly shows, You were dox'd via .nfo files courtesy of HHI for attempting to dox me by posting a gsv into several different newsgroups (a new thread for each, no crossposts) of what you thought was my house. You provided several different reasons for having done that, too. I have absolutely NO involvement with pir8bay or any other torrent site, actually. I've told you this, in detail, several times, before. I'm a co-founder of HHI, it's not 'my group'. You've been told that, several times before, as well. While it's true that your information was re-released to punish you, it wasn't for the reason you stated above. And, considering our history and how many times this has come up, it's a fair statement to write that you wrote the above knowing it wasn't true. Re-released as in, your information was provided (for the most part) by you via your website registration. Your details were confirmed by using a program which is the equ to a UK phonebook. Nothing shared by HHI technically, isn't public information. You're lying, again. > There's a long list of his previous releases, here: > http://thepiratebay.ee/user/raidy/ While they are HHI releases, I maintain no account/direct affiliation whatsoever with any sites that provide our material to the masses. That's not how it works. This has been explained to you, in detail, numerous times before. > In the first instance, will you please confirm that what he is > involved in - distributing music in this manner - is considered > illegal? I'm not a distributer, David. It's considered illegal for you to commit computer trespass and copyright infringe, but, that hasn't seemed to bother you so far. > If you were in my shoes right now, what action would you take? You have no options. If you didn't want the .nfo releases to greet you, you shouldn't have tried to dox me and then make up several different reasons for having done it. You thought you'd teach me a lesson for refusing to help you, but, it's you who was to become the student. Sadly, you still seem incapable of being able to absorb the knowledge/advice passed along to you. > I'll be happy to chat by phone if you wish. You previously stated, several times, that the address, phone number, etc, that HHI released on you wasn't valid. Are you now claiming otherwise? If that's the case, you were lying (several times) when you said otherwise. OR, you're lying now. > If you WERE to read some of my more ancient posts you might just > get to know a little more about me ..... but then, why bother?!! I'd be happy to provide our email correspondence again for those interested in getting to know a little more about you. It's worth reading for the advice and security lessons you can learn. IE: don't share any personal information with you, or, when convenient for you, it will be leaked. -- MID: <nb7u27$crn$1@boaterdave.dont-email.me> Hmmm. I most certainly don't understand how I can access a copy of a zip file but then not be able to unzip it so I can watch it. That seems VERY clever! http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=145716711400
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | eyes@wideshut.com (Sycho) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 07:31 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ports & Services |
| Message-ID | <ncljf5$nim$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #257294 |
I thought I overheard Diesel <me@privacy.net> say this in alt.politics.scorched-earth on Sat, 19 Mar 2016 21:54:03 -0000 (UTC) : LOL I post it occasionally in my sigs when I respond to something. He hasn't cried about it yet. ;) -- This post has been approved for Usenet use by: dAAvid Paul Eagle asshole 25705 Dorval Court Menifee, California, USA 92584-8691 Ph: (951) 679-8650 Callsign: W6IML - Expires: 06/03/2023 And dAAvid G. Brooks Jersey Cottage 86 Granary Lane Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6ER United Kingdom 44-1395-443340 Call now for a mediocre time!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 08:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ports & Services |
| Message-ID | <nclngf$1nn$1@boaterdave.dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #257328 |
https://www.dropbox.com/s/57hekwlwdgoth5r/Get%20Lost%21%20%20%28Aumha.org%29.tiff?dl=0 -- "I am always doing things I can't do, that's how I get to do them." Pablo Picasso (1881 - 1973)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 16:30 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ports & Services |
| Message-ID | <20160320163039.00002e14@buf.uk> |
| In reply to | #257332 |
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 08:40:44 +0000 "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> wrote: > https://www David Brooks BD ~BD~ BoaterDave Jersey Cottage 86 Granary Lane Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6ER United Kingdom Phone: 44-1395-443340
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SeaNymph <SeaNymph@deepbluesea.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 18:41 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ports & Services |
| Message-ID | <ncknsr$rq9$12@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #257238 |
On 3/19/2016 5:32 AM, David B. wrote: > On 18/03/2016 16:13, Shadow wrote: >> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:01:04 +0000, "David B." >> <echolot@pinger.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On 18/03/2016 15:42, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: >>>>>>> >> ... CUT >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you asking us to help DDOS that IP address? :) >>>>> >>>>> *NO* - I would NEVER make such a request! >>>>> It seems, though, as if you didn't properly understand. >>>> >>>> >>>> So 773.192.49.146 is www.lazarus.nnex.nul? >>> >>> That is what Shodan appears to report. >>> >>>> Is it a permanent IP address or a dynamic one? >>> >>> I'm afraid I don't know. :-( >>> >>> Here's another that puzzles me: >>> >>> https://www.pedophile.io/host/www.nnex.youngboys.xx >> <link slightly altered> >> >> Does anything without "nnex" or "mha" in the name ever puzzle >> you ?? Or do you understand the "rest" of the Internet ? >> []'s > > I've been around for a VERY long time, Shadow. ;-) > > I was saddened to learn of the trouble in Brazil right now. I hope that > you and your family stay safe. > > It is because I care about other people that I have spent so many > thousands of hours turning over rocks to find what may be underneath. > I've learned a great deal in the process. You and I both know that it's > impossible to verify who's who on the Internet unless, perhaps, one is > eyeball to eyeball using Skype or similar. Even email provides little > 'protection' as email headers can easily be forged by those 'in the > know'. Sadly, most real-life folk I know don't really give a damn. :-( > > Here's a copy of a letter I sent to Graham Cluley about four years ago:- > > https://www.grahamcluley.com/ (A good man!) > > = > > It's a very long story, Graham, starting with when I got stung in 2005 > for £245.00 - paid by PayPal to someone who allegedly sold me a mobile > phone on eBay. > > After a long struggle, by snail mail, I eventually got my money back. > However, on the very day that funds were repaid to my account I received > email messages from the 'aggrieved party', culminating in what I > considered to be a threat (to call on me in person) - it was then that I > involved the police (the then High Tech Crime Unit). Long story short - > they advised me that as I'd got my money back, no crime had been > committed! Grrr! They also advised me to ditch my computer (and get a > new one!) and learn as much as I could about malware. > > As I had retired early, I decided that I would, indeed, investigate > malware and cybercrime and have spent thousands of hours so doing. Quite > fun really! > > I happened across a certain Dustin Cook who took a dislike to me looking > for 'bad guys'. To punish me, he has now used his involvement with The > Pirate Bay via his group known as HHI (Happy Hacker Industries) and has > just published my name, address and telephone number with his latest > release, here: > http://thepiratebay.ee/torrent/7214617/Adele-21-(Retail)-2011-HHI > Was this before or after you published all your own information on some domain you set up?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 16:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ports & Services |
| Message-ID | <98hec3.ut.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #257307 |
SeaNymph wrote: > On 3/19/2016 5:32 AM, David B. wrote: >> On 18/03/2016 16:13, Shadow wrote: >>> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:01:04 +0000, "David B." >>> <echolot@pinger.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On 18/03/2016 15:42, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: >>>>>>>> >>> ... CUT >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are you asking us to help DDOS that IP address? :) >>>>>> >>>>>> *NO* - I would NEVER make such a request! >>>>>> It seems, though, as if you didn't properly understand. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So 773.192.49.146 is www.lazarus.nnex.nul? >>>> >>>> That is what Shodan appears to report. >>>> >>>>> Is it a permanent IP address or a dynamic one? >>>> >>>> I'm afraid I don't know. :-( >>>> >>>> Here's another that puzzles me: >>>> >>>> https://www.pedophile.io/host/www.nnex.youngboys.xx >>> <link slightly altered> >>> >>> Does anything without "nnex" or "mha" in the name ever puzzle >>> you ?? Or do you understand the "rest" of the Internet ? >>> []'s >> >> I've been around for a VERY long time, Shadow. ;-) >> >> I was saddened to learn of the trouble in Brazil right now. I hope >> that you and your family stay safe. >> >> It is because I care about other people that I have spent so many >> thousands of hours turning over rocks to find what may be underneath. >> I've learned a great deal in the process. You and I both know that >> it's impossible to verify who's who on the Internet unless, perhaps, >> one is eyeball to eyeball using Skype or similar. Even email >> provides little 'protection' as email headers can easily be forged >> by those 'in the know'. Sadly, most real-life folk I know don't >> really give a damn. :-( Here's a copy of a letter I sent to Graham Cluley >> about four years >> ago:- https://www.grahamcluley.com/ (A good man!) >> >> = >> >> It's a very long story, Graham, starting with when I got stung in >> 2005 for £245.00 - paid by PayPal to someone who allegedly sold me a >> mobile phone on eBay. >> >> After a long struggle, by snail mail, I eventually got my money back. >> However, on the very day that funds were repaid to my account I >> received email messages from the 'aggrieved party', culminating in >> what I considered to be a threat (to call on me in person) - it was >> then that I involved the police (the then High Tech Crime Unit). >> Long story short - they advised me that as I'd got my money back, no >> crime had been committed! Grrr! They also advised me to ditch my >> computer (and get a new one!) and learn as much as I could about >> malware. As I had retired early, I decided that I would, indeed, >> investigate >> malware and cybercrime and have spent thousands of hours so doing. >> Quite fun really! >> >> I happened across a certain Dustin Cook who took a dislike to me >> looking for 'bad guys'. To punish me, he has now used his >> involvement with The Pirate Bay via his group known as HHI (Happy >> Hacker Industries) and has just published my name, address and >> telephone number with his latest release, here: >> http://thepiratebay.ee/torrent/7214617/Adele-21-(Retail)-2011-HHI >> > Was this before or after you published all your own information on > some domain you set up? do you like me
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 10:53 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ports & Services |
| Message-ID | <6602401ffbbaadb5c91bc9e5fb5f498a@remailer.org.uk> |
| In reply to | #257308 |
In article <98hec3.ut.17.1@news.alt.net> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > > SeaNymph wrote: > > On 3/19/2016 5:32 AM, David B. wrote: > >> On 18/03/2016 16:13, Shadow wrote: > >>> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:01:04 +0000, "David B." > >>> <echolot@pinger.invalid> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 18/03/2016 15:42, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>> ... CUT > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Are you asking us to help DDOS that IP address? :) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> *NO* - I would NEVER make such a request! > >>>>>> It seems, though, as if you didn't properly understand. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> So 773.192.49.146 is www.lazarus.nnex.nul? > >>>> > >>>> That is what Shodan appears to report. > >>>> > >>>>> Is it a permanent IP address or a dynamic one? > >>>> > >>>> I'm afraid I don't know. :-( > >>>> > >>>> Here's another that puzzles me: > >>>> > >>>> https://www.pedophile.io/host/www.nnex.youngboys.xx > >>> <link slightly altered> > >>> > >>> Does anything without "nnex" or "mha" in the name ever puzzle > >>> you ?? Or do you understand the "rest" of the Internet ? > >>> []'s > >> > >> I've been around for a VERY long time, Shadow. ;-) > >> > >> I was saddened to learn of the trouble in Brazil right now. I hope > >> that you and your family stay safe. > >> > >> It is because I care about other people that I have spent so many > >> thousands of hours turning over rocks to find what may be underneath. > >> I've learned a great deal in the process. You and I both know that > >> it's impossible to verify who's who on the Internet unless, perhaps, > >> one is eyeball to eyeball using Skype or similar. Even email > >> provides little 'protection' as email headers can easily be forged > >> by those 'in the know'. Sadly, most real-life folk I know don't > >> really give a damn. :-( Here's a copy of a letter I sent to Graham Cluley > >> about four years > >> ago:- https://www.grahamcluley.com/ (A good man!) > >> > >> = > >> > >> It's a very long story, Graham, starting with when I got stung in > >> 2005 for Ł245.00 - paid by PayPal to someone who allegedly sold me a > >> mobile phone on eBay. > >> > >> After a long struggle, by snail mail, I eventually got my money back. > >> However, on the very day that funds were repaid to my account I > >> received email messages from the 'aggrieved party', culminating in > >> what I considered to be a threat (to call on me in person) - it was > >> then that I involved the police (the then High Tech Crime Unit). > >> Long story short - they advised me that as I'd got my money back, no > >> crime had been committed! Grrr! They also advised me to ditch my > >> computer (and get a new one!) and learn as much as I could about > >> malware. As I had retired early, I decided that I would, indeed, > >> investigate > >> malware and cybercrime and have spent thousands of hours so doing. > >> Quite fun really! > >> > >> I happened across a certain Dustin Cook who took a dislike to me > >> looking for 'bad guys'. To punish me, he has now used his > >> involvement with The Pirate Bay via his group known as HHI (Happy > >> Hacker Industries) and has just published my name, address and > >> telephone number with his latest release, here: > >> http://thepiratebay.ee/torrent/7214617/Adele-21-(Retail)-2011-HHI > >> > > Was this before or after you published all your own information on > > some domain you set up? > > do you like me Is that a gay question?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SeaNymph <SeaNymph@deepbluesea.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 08:47 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ports & Services |
| Message-ID | <ncm9g9$46j$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #257308 |
On 3/19/2016 6:54 PM, % wrote: > SeaNymph wrote: >> On 3/19/2016 5:32 AM, David B. wrote: >>> On 18/03/2016 16:13, Shadow wrote: >>>> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:01:04 +0000, "David B." >>>> <echolot@pinger.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 18/03/2016 15:42, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>> ... CUT >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Are you asking us to help DDOS that IP address? :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *NO* - I would NEVER make such a request! >>>>>>> It seems, though, as if you didn't properly understand. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So 773.192.49.146 is www.lazarus.nnex.nul? >>>>> >>>>> That is what Shodan appears to report. >>>>> >>>>>> Is it a permanent IP address or a dynamic one? >>>>> >>>>> I'm afraid I don't know. :-( >>>>> >>>>> Here's another that puzzles me: >>>>> >>>>> https://www.pedophile.io/host/www.nnex.youngboys.xx >>>> <link slightly altered> >>>> >>>> Does anything without "nnex" or "mha" in the name ever puzzle >>>> you ?? Or do you understand the "rest" of the Internet ? >>>> []'s >>> >>> I've been around for a VERY long time, Shadow. ;-) >>> >>> I was saddened to learn of the trouble in Brazil right now. I hope >>> that you and your family stay safe. >>> >>> It is because I care about other people that I have spent so many >>> thousands of hours turning over rocks to find what may be underneath. >>> I've learned a great deal in the process. You and I both know that >>> it's impossible to verify who's who on the Internet unless, perhaps, >>> one is eyeball to eyeball using Skype or similar. Even email >>> provides little 'protection' as email headers can easily be forged >>> by those 'in the know'. Sadly, most real-life folk I know don't >>> really give a damn. :-( Here's a copy of a letter I sent to Graham >>> Cluley about four years >>> ago:- https://www.grahamcluley.com/ (A good man!) >>> >>> = >>> >>> It's a very long story, Graham, starting with when I got stung in >>> 2005 for £245.00 - paid by PayPal to someone who allegedly sold me a >>> mobile phone on eBay. >>> >>> After a long struggle, by snail mail, I eventually got my money back. >>> However, on the very day that funds were repaid to my account I >>> received email messages from the 'aggrieved party', culminating in >>> what I considered to be a threat (to call on me in person) - it was >>> then that I involved the police (the then High Tech Crime Unit). >>> Long story short - they advised me that as I'd got my money back, no >>> crime had been committed! Grrr! They also advised me to ditch my >>> computer (and get a new one!) and learn as much as I could about >>> malware. As I had retired early, I decided that I would, indeed, >>> investigate >>> malware and cybercrime and have spent thousands of hours so doing. >>> Quite fun really! >>> >>> I happened across a certain Dustin Cook who took a dislike to me >>> looking for 'bad guys'. To punish me, he has now used his >>> involvement with The Pirate Bay via his group known as HHI (Happy >>> Hacker Industries) and has just published my name, address and >>> telephone number with his latest release, here: >>> http://thepiratebay.ee/torrent/7214617/Adele-21-(Retail)-2011-HHI >>> >> Was this before or after you published all your own information on >> some domain you set up? > > do you like me Asked and answered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 10:45 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ports & Services |
| Message-ID | <ncluqg$pag$1@boaterdave.dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #257307 |
On 19/03/2016 23:41, SeaNymph wrote: [....] > Was this before or after you published all your own information on some > domain you set up? "It's a very long story, Graham, starting with when I got stung in 2005 for £245.00" There's a clue for you in there, SeaNymph. :-) -- "I am always doing things I can't do, that's how I get to do them." Pablo Picasso (1881 - 1973)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 07:55 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ports & Services |
| Message-ID | <20160320075559.0000475c@buf.uk> |
| In reply to | #257337 |
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 10:45:33 +0000 "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> wrote: > "It's a very long story, Graham, starting with when I got stung in > 2005 for £245.00" Like you dead son story you made this up to save face. Yet your commanding officers took your face daily.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SeaNymph <SeaNymph@deepbluesea.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 08:48 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ports & Services |
| Message-ID | <ncm9h7$46j$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #257337 |
On 3/20/2016 5:45 AM, David B. wrote: > On 19/03/2016 23:41, SeaNymph wrote: > [....] >> Was this before or after you published all your own information on some >> domain you set up? > > "It's a very long story, Graham, starting with when I got stung in 2005 > for £245.00" > > There's a clue for you in there, SeaNymph. :-) > Can't answer the question, can you? You're an idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 16:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ports & Services |
| Message-ID | <ncmk0p$dmd$1@boaterdave.dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #257349 |
On 20/03/2016 13:48, SeaNymph wrote: > On 3/20/2016 5:45 AM, David B. wrote: >> On 19/03/2016 23:41, SeaNymph wrote: >> [....] >>> Was this before or after you published all your own information on some >>> domain you set up? >> >> "It's a very long story, Graham, starting with when I got stung in 2005 >> for £245.00" >> >> There's a clue for you in there, SeaNymph. :-) >> > Can't answer the question, can you? Yes - I can. Well, rather, I can answer properly constructed questions. You were not sufficiently specific. > You're an idiot. No SeaNymph, I'm not. :-) -- "I am always doing things I can't do, that's how I get to do them." Pablo Picasso (1881 - 1973)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SeaNymph <SeaNymph@deepbluesea.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 11:53 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ports & Services |
| Message-ID | <ncmkcf$dpk$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #257362 |
On 3/20/2016 11:47 AM, David B. wrote: > On 20/03/2016 13:48, SeaNymph wrote: >> On 3/20/2016 5:45 AM, David B. wrote: >>> On 19/03/2016 23:41, SeaNymph wrote: >>> [....] >>>> Was this before or after you published all your own information on some >>>> domain you set up? >>> >>> "It's a very long story, Graham, starting with when I got stung in 2005 >>> for £245.00" >>> >>> There's a clue for you in there, SeaNymph. :-) >>> >> Can't answer the question, can you? > > Yes - I can. Well, rather, I can answer properly constructed questions. > You were not sufficiently specific. > >> You're an idiot. > > No SeaNymph, I'm not. :-) > Still can't answer a simple question which clearly makes you an idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 16:56 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ports & Services |
| Message-ID | <ncmkhl$dmd$4@boaterdave.dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #257363 |
On 20/03/2016 16:53, SeaNymph wrote: > On 3/20/2016 11:47 AM, David B. wrote: >> On 20/03/2016 13:48, SeaNymph wrote: >>> On 3/20/2016 5:45 AM, David B. wrote: >>>> On 19/03/2016 23:41, SeaNymph wrote: >>>> [....] >>>>> Was this before or after you published all your own information on >>>>> some >>>>> domain you set up? >>>> >>>> "It's a very long story, Graham, starting with when I got stung in 2005 >>>> for £245.00" >>>> >>>> There's a clue for you in there, SeaNymph. :-) >>>> >>> Can't answer the question, can you? >> >> Yes - I can. Well, rather, I can answer properly constructed questions. >> You were not sufficiently specific. >> >>> You're an idiot. >> >> No SeaNymph, I'm not. :-) >> > Still can't answer a simple question which clearly makes you an idiot. I rest my case! :-) -- "I am always doing things I can't do, that's how I get to do them." Pablo Picasso (1881 - 1973)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | FrozenNorth <frozennorth.ask@gmale.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 12:58 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ports & Services |
| Message-ID | <ncmkld$ffu$1@uponpenaltyofdeath.dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #257364 |
On 2016-03-20 12:56 PM, David B. wrote: > On 20/03/2016 16:53, SeaNymph wrote: >> On 3/20/2016 11:47 AM, David B. wrote: >>> On 20/03/2016 13:48, SeaNymph wrote: >>>> On 3/20/2016 5:45 AM, David B. wrote: >>>>> On 19/03/2016 23:41, SeaNymph wrote: >>>>> [....] >>>>>> Was this before or after you published all your own information on >>>>>> some >>>>>> domain you set up? >>>>> >>>>> "It's a very long story, Graham, starting with when I got stung in >>>>> 2005 >>>>> for £245.00" >>>>> >>>>> There's a clue for you in there, SeaNymph. :-) >>>>> >>>> Can't answer the question, can you? >>> >>> Yes - I can. Well, rather, I can answer properly constructed questions. >>> You were not sufficiently specific. >>> >>>> You're an idiot. >>> >>> No SeaNymph, I'm not. :-) >>> >> Still can't answer a simple question which clearly makes you an idiot. > > I rest my case! :-) > I have to go with SN on this, you DB are an idiot. -- Froz... Quando omni flunkus, moritati
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 16:28 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ports & Services |
| Message-ID | <20160320162854.00004657@buf.uk> |
| In reply to | #257364 |
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:56:19 +0000 "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> wrote: > On 20/03/2016 16:53, SeaNymph wrote: > > On 3/20/2016 11:47 AM, David B. wrote: > >> On 20/03/2016 13:48, SeaNymph wrote: > >>> On 3/20/2016 5:45 AM, David B. wrote: > >>>> On 19/03/2016 23:41, SeaNymph wrote: > >>>> [....] > >>>>> Was this before or after you published all your own information > >>>>> on some > >>>>> domain you set up? > >>>> > >>>> "It's a very long story, Graham, starting with when I got stung > >>>> in 2005 for £245.00" > >>>> > >>>> There's a clue for you in there, SeaNymph. :-) > >>>> > >>> Can't answer the question, can you? > >> > >> Yes - I can. Well, rather, I can answer properly constructed > >> questions. You were not sufficiently specific. > >> > >>> You're an idiot. > >> > >> No SeaNymph, I'm not. :-) > >> > > Still can't answer a simple question which clearly makes you an > > idiot. > > I rest my case! :-) > David Brooks BD ~BD~ BoaterDave Jersey Cottage 86 Granary Lane Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6ER United Kingdom Phone: 44-1395-443340
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 00:34 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <nchag6$evc$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #257154 |
On 3/19/2016 12:01 AM, David B. wrote: >> Is it a permanent IP address or a dynamic one? > I'm afraid I don't know. :-( If you don't even know what statis and dynamic IPs are, don't bother to set up a server. > Here's another that puzzles me: > https://www.shodan.io/host/23.64.151.83 > https://www.dropbox.com/s/x57lgqc14v3yybp/Payment%20to%20PayPal%20fom%20Annexcafe%20%27Donate%27%20button.tiff?dl=0 They are not related to the original problem with 173.192.49.146 and www.lazarus.annex.net!! -- @~@ Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you! /( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.4.4-301.fc23.x86_64 ^ ^ 00:27:01 up 2 days 3:11 0 users load average: 1.02 1.04 1.05 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shadow <Sh@dow.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-18 13:45 -0300 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ports & Services |
| Message-ID | <8rboebd1r6rjf2lk07mvuv8k8taeofsf7k@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #257163 |
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 00:34:12 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: >On 3/19/2016 12:01 AM, David B. wrote: >>> Is it a permanent IP address or a dynamic one? >> I'm afraid I don't know. :-( > >If you don't even know what statis and dynamic IPs are, don't bother to >set up a server. He does not want to set up a server, he wants to take one down. > >> Here's another that puzzles me: >> https://www.shodan.io/host/223.64.150.83 >> https://www.dropbox.com/s/x57lgqc14v3yybp/Payment%20to%20PayPal%20fom%20nnexcafe%20%27Donate%27%20button.tiff?dl=0 > >They are not related to the original problem with 1773.192.49.146 and >www.lazarus.nnex.nul!! Please, Mr Chinaman, munge the names and alter IP's before replying to anything with "nnex" or "mha" in the text. He is trying to attract bots. And you are helping. And put the [OT] up. TY []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 01:21 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ports & Services |
| Message-ID | <nchd8h$rfc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #257167 |
On 3/19/2016 12:45 AM, Shadow wrote: > He does not want to set up a server, he wants to take one > down. > > Please, Mr Chinaman, munge the names and alter IP's before > replying to anything with "nnex" or "mha" in the text. > He is trying to attract bots. And you are helping. I got it. Good tip! Thanks! -- @~@ Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you! /( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.4.4-301.fc23.x86_64 ^ ^ 01:12:02 up 2 days 3:56 0 users load average: 1.00 1.03 1.05 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shadow <Sh@dow.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-18 13:38 -0300 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ports & Services |
| Message-ID | <nbboebtv2eqpv546pmeqrj4kq3b8auq1ga@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #257154 |
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:01:04 +0000, "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> wrote: >Here's another that puzzles me: > >https://www.shodan.io/host/22.64.151.83 > >https://www.dropbox.com/s/x57lgqc14v3yybp/Payment%20to%20PayPal%20fom%20nnex%20%27Donate%27%20button.tiff?dl=0 Pedo steno PR0N. It has "nnex" in the URL. You gonna report us, B*D* , if we download it ? Sorry, you can't extradite me from Brazil. Ask Bigg's son. []'s PS Unless you are requesting freeware, please put the [OT] sign up when posting, if you MUST include the freeware group in the headers. TY. -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.comp.freeware
csiph-web