Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.checkmate > #55727 > unrolled thread

Re: 3 phase teaser

Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 09:26 -0800
    Re: 3 phase teaser snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-17 17:32 +0000
    Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 11:38 -0700
      Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 11:07 -0800
        Re: 3 phase teaser snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-17 19:23 +0000
          Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 12:22 -0800
        Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 13:07 -0700
          Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 12:30 -0800
            Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 16:42 -0500
            Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-18 19:02 +0800
          Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 16:41 -0500

#55727 — Re: 3 phase teaser

In article <na2899$18kf$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid 
says...


> 
> On 16/02/2016 3:54 AM, Sn!pe wrote:
> > Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> >
> >> In article <6rj5cb9ntt6n40u3qj9jmpa096hf5lvs2e@4ax.com>,
> >> skeet@invalid.invalid says...
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:03:34 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> >>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I didn't have to "visually represent" a fucking thing, you moron, I
> >>>> only had to prove you *wrong*, which I've done. LOL
> >>
> >> If he DOES have to say so himself.  LOL
> >
> > You must admit that the fake is good value though, he's very
> > cheap to run; I reckon the wordage ratio of his spittle and foam
> > versus troll hook must be close to 10:1.
> 
> More like 100:1. Sometimes as high as 600:1. I've definitely gotten 
> multi-hundred-line responses to one-liners from the kOok on multiple 
> occasions.
> 
> *snicker*

And even when everyone is laughing@him for doing it, he persists in 
doing it.  I guess he thinks we're laughing "with" him.

BTW, did you see where he socked up to "out" himself, and the 
"accidentally" left your sig at the bottom?

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#55728

Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:

> In article <na2899$18kf$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid
> says...
> 
> > On 16/02/2016 3:54 AM, Sn!pe wrote:
> > > Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> > >
> > >> In article <6rj5cb9ntt6n40u3qj9jmpa096hf5lvs2e@4ax.com>,
> > >> skeet@invalid.invalid says...
> > >>
> > >>> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:03:34 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> > >>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I didn't have to "visually represent" a fucking thing, you moron, I
> > >>>> only had to prove you *wrong*, which I've done. LOL
> > >>
> > >> If he DOES have to say so himself.  LOL
> > >
> > > You must admit that the fake is good value though, he's very
> > > cheap to run; I reckon the wordage ratio of his spittle and foam
> > > versus troll hook must be close to 10:1.
> > 
> > More like 100:1. Sometimes as high as 600:1. I've definitely gotten
> > multi-hundred-line responses to one-liners from the kOok on multiple
> > occasions.
> > 
> > *snicker*
> 
> And even when everyone is laughing@him for doing it, he persists in 
> doing it.  I guess he thinks we're laughing "with" him.
> 
> BTW, did you see where he socked up to "out" himself, and the 
> "accidentally" left your sig at the bottom?
>

[fetches popcorn]

-- 
^Ï^.    Sn!pe, DoW #2    <snipeco.1@gmail.com>

PTB
Siri Seal of Disavowal #007-007 (license to killfile)
AUK DoW #2, Fuckhead #3 
AUK Ministry of Circle Jerks, Aug. 2015 (award now deprecated)
0 %

My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55729

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:26:19 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
<Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:

>In article <na2899$18kf$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid 
>says...
>
>
>> 
>> On 16/02/2016 3:54 AM, Sn!pe wrote:
>> > Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>> >
>> >> In article <6rj5cb9ntt6n40u3qj9jmpa096hf5lvs2e@4ax.com>,
>> >> skeet@invalid.invalid says...
>> >>
>> >>> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:03:34 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>> >>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> I didn't have to "visually represent" a fucking thing, you moron, I
>> >>>> only had to prove you *wrong*, which I've done. LOL
>> >>
>> >> If he DOES have to say so himself.  LOL
>> >
>> > You must admit that the fake is good value though, he's very
>> > cheap to run; I reckon the wordage ratio of his spittle and foam
>> > versus troll hook must be close to 10:1.
>> 
>> More like 100:1. Sometimes as high as 600:1. I've definitely gotten 
>> multi-hundred-line responses to one-liners from the kOok on multiple 
>> occasions.
>> 
>> *snicker*
>
>And even when everyone is laughing@him for doing it, he persists in 
>doing it.  I guess he thinks we're laughing "with" him.
>
>BTW, did you see where he socked up to "out" himself, and the 
>"accidentally" left your sig at the bottom?


I didn't know they shared sigs. Hmmmm

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55735

In article <7gf9cb9c0eubr6t80harss8ds50kh270c4@4ax.com>, 
skeet@invalid.invalid says...


> 
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:26:19 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> 
> >In article <na2899$18kf$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid 
> >says...
> >
> >
> >> 
> >> On 16/02/2016 3:54 AM, Sn!pe wrote:
> >> > Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> In article <6rj5cb9ntt6n40u3qj9jmpa096hf5lvs2e@4ax.com>,
> >> >> skeet@invalid.invalid says...
> >> >>
> >> >>> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:03:34 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> >> >>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> I didn't have to "visually represent" a fucking thing, you moron, I
> >> >>>> only had to prove you *wrong*, which I've done. LOL
> >> >>
> >> >> If he DOES have to say so himself.  LOL
> >> >
> >> > You must admit that the fake is good value though, he's very
> >> > cheap to run; I reckon the wordage ratio of his spittle and foam
> >> > versus troll hook must be close to 10:1.
> >> 
> >> More like 100:1. Sometimes as high as 600:1. I've definitely gotten 
> >> multi-hundred-line responses to one-liners from the kOok on multiple 
> >> occasions.
> >> 
> >> *snicker*
> >
> >And even when everyone is laughing@him for doing it, he persists in 
> >doing it.  I guess he thinks we're laughing "with" him.
> >
> >BTW, did you see where he socked up to "out" himself, and the 
> >"accidentally" left your sig at the bottom?
> 
> 
> I didn't know they shared sigs. Hmmmm

I could have sworn I archived it, but apparently not.  The thread was 
something like "Guess who just got outted," by a new mystery sock, but a 
Kensi sig at the bottom.  Obviously made to look like it came from 
Kensi, bur Kensi isn't that dumb.  WAY too obvious.

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55736

Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:

> > >BTW, did you see where he socked up to "out" himself, and the 
> > >"accidentally" left your sig at the bottom?
> > 
> > 
> > I didn't know they shared sigs. Hmmmm
> 
> I could have sworn I archived it, but apparently not.  The thread was
> something like "Guess who just got outted," by a new mystery sock, but a
> Kensi sig at the bottom.  Obviously made to look like it came from 
> Kensi, bur Kensi isn't that dumb.  WAY too obvious.
>

Here you go:

===========================================

From: Snickers <snicker@gmail.com>
Subject: Guess who just got outed?
Message-ID: <c3d9c3839f55d92737a5ab1b88c1c81f@dizum.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 19:31:08 +0100 (CET)
Newsgroups: alt.free.newsservers,alt.usenet.kooks
Path:
buffer1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!sewer!news.dizum.net!not-for-mail
Organization: dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider
X-Abuse: abuse@dizum.com
Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 194.109.206.211
Bytes: 1420
Lines: 26
Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com alt.usenet.kooks:2613563
alt.free.newsservers:209660

Joshua R. Brock
1247 Volcan View Drive
Julian, CA 92036
Geo coordinates: 33.082677, -116.587390

Wife: Maribelle Louisa
Mother's maiden name: Green
SSN: 560-44-6208
Birthday: December 19, 1987
Visa: 4485 2836 4208 6969
Expires: 1/2020
CVV2: 600
Companies: Brock Investments, Chick-Fil-A franchise, Engines Unlimited,
Plastic Engineering
Occupation: self-employed, CEO
Net worth: $17,450,000
Height: 6' 3"
Weight: 257 pounds
Vehicles: Lotus Exige, Hummer H1, BMW K1600GTL, Kawasaki KLX250S

*snicker*

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

===================================================

-- 
^Ï^.    Sn!pe, DoW #2    <snipeco.1@gmail.com>

PTB
Siri Seal of Disavowal #007-007 (license to killfile)
AUK DoW #2, Fuckhead #3 
AUK Ministry of Circle Jerks, Aug. 2015 (award now deprecated)
0 %

My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55738

In article <1mis350.1yw1kewfpenjbN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2
@gmail.com says...


> 
> Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> 
> > > >BTW, did you see where he socked up to "out" himself, and the 
> > > >"accidentally" left your sig at the bottom?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I didn't know they shared sigs. Hmmmm
> > 
> > I could have sworn I archived it, but apparently not.  The thread was
> > something like "Guess who just got outted," by a new mystery sock, but a
> > Kensi sig at the bottom.  Obviously made to look like it came from 
> > Kensi, bur Kensi isn't that dumb.  WAY too obvious.
> >
> 
> Here you go:
> 
> ===========================================
> 
> From: Snickers <snicker@gmail.com>
> Subject: Guess who just got outed?
> Message-ID: <c3d9c3839f55d92737a5ab1b88c1c81f@dizum.com>
> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 19:31:08 +0100 (CET)
> Newsgroups: alt.free.newsservers,alt.usenet.kooks
> Path:
> buffer1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!sewer!news.dizum.net!not-for-mail
> Organization: dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider
> X-Abuse: abuse@dizum.com
> Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 194.109.206.211
> Bytes: 1420
> Lines: 26
> Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com alt.usenet.kooks:2613563
> alt.free.newsservers:209660
> 
> Joshua R. Brock
> 1247 Volcan View Drive
> Julian, CA 92036
> Geo coordinates: 33.082677, -116.587390
> 
> Wife: Maribelle Louisa
> Mother's maiden name: Green
> SSN: 560-44-6208
> Birthday: December 19, 1987
> Visa: 4485 2836 4208 6969
> Expires: 1/2020
> CVV2: 600
> Companies: Brock Investments, Chick-Fil-A franchise, Engines Unlimited,
> Plastic Engineering
> Occupation: self-employed, CEO
> Net worth: $17,450,000
> Height: 6' 3"
> Weight: 257 pounds
> Vehicles: Lotus Exige, Hummer H1, BMW K1600GTL, Kawasaki KLX250S
> 
> *snicker*
> 
> -- 
> "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
> the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
> "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
> in here."                                                     ~Checkmate
> 
> ===================================================

Why thank yew.  I've archived that, just for shits and giggles.  I 
noticed he valued his own net worth at about $17.5 M.  No reason to 
doubt that, I suppose...

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55737

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:07:51 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
<Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:

>In article <7gf9cb9c0eubr6t80harss8ds50kh270c4@4ax.com>, 
>skeet@invalid.invalid says...
>
>
>> 
>> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:26:19 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
>> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>> 
>> >In article <na2899$18kf$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid 
>> >says...
>> >
>> >
>> >> 
>> >> On 16/02/2016 3:54 AM, Sn!pe wrote:
>> >> > Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> In article <6rj5cb9ntt6n40u3qj9jmpa096hf5lvs2e@4ax.com>,
>> >> >> skeet@invalid.invalid says...
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:03:34 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>> >> >>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> I didn't have to "visually represent" a fucking thing, you moron, I
>> >> >>>> only had to prove you *wrong*, which I've done. LOL
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If he DOES have to say so himself.  LOL
>> >> >
>> >> > You must admit that the fake is good value though, he's very
>> >> > cheap to run; I reckon the wordage ratio of his spittle and foam
>> >> > versus troll hook must be close to 10:1.
>> >> 
>> >> More like 100:1. Sometimes as high as 600:1. I've definitely gotten 
>> >> multi-hundred-line responses to one-liners from the kOok on multiple 
>> >> occasions.
>> >> 
>> >> *snicker*
>> >
>> >And even when everyone is laughing@him for doing it, he persists in 
>> >doing it.  I guess he thinks we're laughing "with" him.
>> >
>> >BTW, did you see where he socked up to "out" himself, and the 
>> >"accidentally" left your sig at the bottom?
>> 
>> 
>> I didn't know they shared sigs. Hmmmm
>
>I could have sworn I archived it, but apparently not.  The thread was 
>something like "Guess who just got outted," by a new mystery sock, but a 
>Kensi sig at the bottom.  Obviously made to look like it came from 
>Kensi, bur Kensi isn't that dumb.  WAY too obvious.


any one who has a tenth of what fakey is supposed to have would not be
wasting time on usenet.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55739

In article <tlk9cb11gd4pg12duiinsuckda20ge393e@4ax.com>, 
skeet@invalid.invalid says...


> 
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:07:51 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> 
> >In article <7gf9cb9c0eubr6t80harss8ds50kh270c4@4ax.com>, 
> >skeet@invalid.invalid says...
> >
> >
> >> 
> >> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:26:19 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
> >> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >In article <na2899$18kf$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid 
> >> >says...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> 
> >> >> On 16/02/2016 3:54 AM, Sn!pe wrote:
> >> >> > Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> In article <6rj5cb9ntt6n40u3qj9jmpa096hf5lvs2e@4ax.com>,
> >> >> >> skeet@invalid.invalid says...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:03:34 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> >> >> >>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>> I didn't have to "visually represent" a fucking thing, you moron, I
> >> >> >>>> only had to prove you *wrong*, which I've done. LOL
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> If he DOES have to say so himself.  LOL
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You must admit that the fake is good value though, he's very
> >> >> > cheap to run; I reckon the wordage ratio of his spittle and foam
> >> >> > versus troll hook must be close to 10:1.
> >> >> 
> >> >> More like 100:1. Sometimes as high as 600:1. I've definitely gotten 
> >> >> multi-hundred-line responses to one-liners from the kOok on multiple 
> >> >> occasions.
> >> >> 
> >> >> *snicker*
> >> >
> >> >And even when everyone is laughing@him for doing it, he persists in 
> >> >doing it.  I guess he thinks we're laughing "with" him.
> >> >
> >> >BTW, did you see where he socked up to "out" himself, and the 
> >> >"accidentally" left your sig at the bottom?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I didn't know they shared sigs. Hmmmm
> >
> >I could have sworn I archived it, but apparently not.  The thread was 
> >something like "Guess who just got outted," by a new mystery sock, but a 
> >Kensi sig at the bottom.  Obviously made to look like it came from 
> >Kensi, bur Kensi isn't that dumb.  WAY too obvious.
> 
> 
> any one who has a tenth of what fakey is supposed to have would not be
> wasting time on usenet.

Donald Trump posts here.

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55744

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:30:55 -0500, Checkmate, DoW #1  
<Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote:

> In article <tlk9cb11gd4pg12duiinsuckda20ge393e@4ax.com>,
> skeet@invalid.invalid says...
>
>
>>
>> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:07:51 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
>> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <7gf9cb9c0eubr6t80harss8ds50kh270c4@4ax.com>,
>> >skeet@invalid.invalid says...
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:26:19 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
>> >> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >In article <na2899$18kf$3@gioia.aioe.org>,  
>> kkensington01@gmail.invalid
>> >> >says...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 16/02/2016 3:54 AM, Sn!pe wrote:
>> >> >> > Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> In article <6rj5cb9ntt6n40u3qj9jmpa096hf5lvs2e@4ax.com>,
>> >> >> >> skeet@invalid.invalid says...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:03:34 +0100 (CET), Friendly  
>> Neighborhood Vote
>> >> >> >>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>> I didn't have to "visually represent" a fucking thing, you  
>> moron, I
>> >> >> >>>> only had to prove you *wrong*, which I've done. LOL
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> If he DOES have to say so himself.  LOL
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > You must admit that the fake is good value though, he's very
>> >> >> > cheap to run; I reckon the wordage ratio of his spittle and foam
>> >> >> > versus troll hook must be close to 10:1.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> More like 100:1. Sometimes as high as 600:1. I've definitely  
>> gotten
>> >> >> multi-hundred-line responses to one-liners from the kOok on  
>> multiple
>> >> >> occasions.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> *snicker*
>> >> >
>> >> >And even when everyone is laughing@him for doing it, he persists in
>> >> >doing it.  I guess he thinks we're laughing "with" him.
>> >> >
>> >> >BTW, did you see where he socked up to "out" himself, and the
>> >> >"accidentally" left your sig at the bottom?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I didn't know they shared sigs. Hmmmm
>> >
>> >I could have sworn I archived it, but apparently not.  The thread was
>> >something like "Guess who just got outted," by a new mystery sock, but  
>> a
>> >Kensi sig at the bottom.  Obviously made to look like it came from
>> >Kensi, bur Kensi isn't that dumb.  WAY too obvious.
>>
>>
>> any one who has a tenth of what fakey is supposed to have would not be
>> wasting time on usenet.
>
> Donald Trump posts here.
>
fakey had some sort of trump k0oky k0nspiracy theory...

-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL


on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

-

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55745

"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:

> In article <tlk9cb11gd4pg12duiinsuckda20ge393e@4ax.com>, 
> skeet@invalid.invalid says...
> 
> 
> > 
> > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:07:51 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
> > <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> > 
> > >In article <7gf9cb9c0eubr6t80harss8ds50kh270c4@4ax.com>, 
> > >skeet@invalid.invalid says...
> > >
> > >
> > >> 
> > >> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:26:19 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
> > >> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> >In article <na2899$18kf$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid 
> > >> >says...
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >> 
> > >> >> On 16/02/2016 3:54 AM, Sn!pe wrote:
> > >> >> > Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >> In article <6rj5cb9ntt6n40u3qj9jmpa096hf5lvs2e@4ax.com>,
> > >> >> >> skeet@invalid.invalid says...
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:03:34 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> > >> >> >>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >>>> I didn't have to "visually represent" a fucking thing, you moron, I
> > >> >> >>>> only had to prove you *wrong*, which I've done. LOL
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> If he DOES have to say so himself.  LOL
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > You must admit that the fake is good value though, he's very
> > >> >> > cheap to run; I reckon the wordage ratio of his spittle and foam
> > >> >> > versus troll hook must be close to 10:1.
> > >> >> 
> > >> >> More like 100:1. Sometimes as high as 600:1. I've definitely gotten 
> > >> >> multi-hundred-line responses to one-liners from the kOok on multiple 
> > >> >> occasions.
> > >> >> 
> > >> >> *snicker*
> > >> >
> > >> >And even when everyone is laughing@him for doing it, he persists in 
> > >> >doing it.  I guess he thinks we're laughing "with" him.
> > >> >
> > >> >BTW, did you see where he socked up to "out" himself, and the 
> > >> >"accidentally" left your sig at the bottom?
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> I didn't know they shared sigs. Hmmmm
> > >
> > >I could have sworn I archived it, but apparently not.  The thread was 
> > >something like "Guess who just got outted," by a new mystery sock, but a 
> > >Kensi sig at the bottom.  Obviously made to look like it came from 
> > >Kensi, bur Kensi isn't that dumb.  WAY too obvious.
> > 
> > 
> > any one who has a tenth of what fakey is supposed to have would not be
> > wasting time on usenet.
> 
> Donald Trump posts here.

The CEOs of McDonald's, Burger King & Taco Bell all read
aff-f.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55743

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:07:04 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:07:51 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>
>> In article <7gf9cb9c0eubr6t80harss8ds50kh270c4@4ax.com>,
>> skeet@invalid.invalid says...
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:26:19 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
>>> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>>>
>>> >In article <na2899$18kf$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid
>>> >says...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> On 16/02/2016 3:54 AM, Sn!pe wrote:
>>> >> > Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> In article <6rj5cb9ntt6n40u3qj9jmpa096hf5lvs2e@4ax.com>,
>>> >> >> skeet@invalid.invalid says...
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:03:34 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood  
>>> Vote
>>> >> >>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>> I didn't have to "visually represent" a fucking thing, you  
>>> moron, I
>>> >> >>>> only had to prove you *wrong*, which I've done. LOL
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> If he DOES have to say so himself.  LOL
>>> >> >
>>> >> > You must admit that the fake is good value though, he's very
>>> >> > cheap to run; I reckon the wordage ratio of his spittle and foam
>>> >> > versus troll hook must be close to 10:1.
>>> >>
>>> >> More like 100:1. Sometimes as high as 600:1. I've definitely gotten
>>> >> multi-hundred-line responses to one-liners from the kOok on multiple
>>> >> occasions.
>>> >>
>>> >> *snicker*
>>> >
>>> >And even when everyone is laughing@him for doing it, he persists in
>>> >doing it.  I guess he thinks we're laughing "with" him.
>>> >
>>> >BTW, did you see where he socked up to "out" himself, and the
>>> >"accidentally" left your sig at the bottom?
>>>
>>>
>>> I didn't know they shared sigs. Hmmmm
>>
>> I could have sworn I archived it, but apparently not.  The thread was
>> something like "Guess who just got outted," by a new mystery sock, but a
>> Kensi sig at the bottom.  Obviously made to look like it came from
>> Kensi, bur Kensi isn't that dumb.  WAY too obvious.
>
>
> any one who has a tenth of what fakey is supposed to have would not be
> wasting time on usenet.

he should be churning out all kinds of sine wave sums but he can't.

-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL


on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

-

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate

csiph-web