Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.checkmate > #690599 > unrolled thread

Yo Snipe

Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate

Contents

  Yo Snipe Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-20 12:44 -0600
    Re: Yo Snipe % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2026-06-20 14:42 -0700
      Re: Yo Snipe Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-20 16:07 -0600
        Re: Yo Snipe % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2026-06-20 18:41 -0700
          Re: Yo Snipe Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-20 21:06 -0600
            Re: Yo Snipe "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> - 2026-06-21 12:28 +0000
              Re: Yo Snipe Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-21 08:42 -0600
                Re: Yo Snipe % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2026-06-21 14:30 -0700
                  Re: Yo Snipe Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-21 16:31 -0600
                    Re: Yo Snipe "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> - 2026-06-21 23:30 +0000
                      Re: Yo Snipe Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-21 17:40 -0600
                        Re: Yo Snipe "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> - 2026-06-22 10:17 +0000
                          Re: Yo Snipe Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-22 10:00 -0600
                Re: Yo Snipe snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2026-06-22 02:36 +0100
                  Re: Yo Snipe Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-21 20:02 -0600
              Re: �?��️�?��???Yo Snipe�?��️�?��??? Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-21 08:45 -0600
                Re: ð?³ï¸â?ð???Yo Snipeð?³ï¸â?ð??? phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-06-21 08:54 -0600
                  Re: �?���?��?��???Yo Snipe�?���?��?��??? Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-21 10:21 -0600
                    Re: ð?³ï?â?ð???Yo Snipeð?³ï?â?ð??? phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-06-21 11:15 -0600
                      Re: �?���?��?��???Yo Snipe�?���?��?��??? Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-21 13:30 -0600
                        Re: ð?³ï?â?ð???Yo Snipeð?³ï?â?ð??? phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-06-21 13:35 -0600
                          Re: �?���?��?��???Yo Snipe�?���?��?��??? Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-21 13:53 -0600
                          Re: Yo Snipe KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.too> - 2026-06-21 18:24 -0700
                      Re: Yo Snipe KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.too> - 2026-06-21 18:25 -0700
                        Re: Yo Snipe Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-21 20:02 -0600
                          Re: Yo Snipe KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.too> - 2026-06-22 17:18 -0700
                            Re: Yo Snipe KKKernal Corn <vet@invalid.com> - 2026-06-23 14:36 +0100
                Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet? Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-21 10:23 -0600
                  Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ????Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet????? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? (Was: ????Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet?????) Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-21 13:28 -0600
                    Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ????Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet????? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? (Was: ????Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet?????) phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-06-21 13:37 -0600
                      Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ????Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet????? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? (Was: ????Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet?????) Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-21 13:53 -0600
                      Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.too> - 2026-06-21 18:24 -0700
                        Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-21 19:59 -0600
                    Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ????? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? (Was: ????? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?) Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-21 17:06 -0600
                  Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet? KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.too> - 2026-06-21 18:23 -0700
                    Re: �?��️�?��???Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet?�?��️�?��??? Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-21 21:01 -0600
                      Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.too> - 2026-06-22 17:17 -0700
                        Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet KKKernal Corn <vet@invalid.com> - 2026-06-23 14:35 +0100
                        Re: �?��️�?��???Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet�?��️�?��??? Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-23 08:12 -0600
                          Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.too> - 2026-06-23 19:26 -0700
                            Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-06-24 06:58 -0600
                              Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.too> - 2026-06-24 18:04 -0700
                                Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-06-24 22:33 -0600
                                  Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.too> - 2026-06-26 01:40 -0700
                                    Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet KKKernal Corn <vet@invalid.com> - 2026-06-26 14:16 +0100
                                    Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-06-26 07:49 -0600
                                      Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.too> - 2026-06-26 19:51 -0700
                                        Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-06-27 06:39 -0600
                                          Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.too> - 2026-06-27 20:13 -0700
                                            Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet KKKernal Corn <vet@invalid.com> - 2026-06-28 20:27 +0100
                                          Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> - 2026-06-28 08:48 +0000
                                            Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on  usenet KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.too> - 2026-06-28 14:26 -0700
                                              Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on  usenet KKKernal Corn <vet@invalid.com> - 2026-06-28 23:03 +0100
                                              Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on  usenet Tom Mix <tommix@mixmin.net> - 2026-06-30 19:20 +0000
                                                Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on  usenet KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.too> - 2026-06-30 19:41 -0700
                                                  Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on  usenet Ed Rhodes <ejay1118@yahoo.con> - 2026-07-01 14:23 +0100
                                        Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet KKKernal Corn <vet@invalid.com> - 2026-06-27 17:33 +0100
                                Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet KKKernal Corn <vet@invalid.com> - 2026-06-25 17:39 +0100
                                Re: �?��️�?��???Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet�?��️�?��??? Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-07-01 13:59 -0600
                                  Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.too> - 2026-07-01 18:26 -0700
                                    Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet Inge Mueller <inge23mueller@aol.con> - 2026-07-02 13:30 +0100
                                      Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2026-07-02 06:39 -0700
                                        Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet Inge Mueller <inge23mueller@aol.con> - 2026-07-02 18:39 +0100
                                          Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2026-07-02 14:13 -0700
                            Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet KKKernal Corn <vet@invalid.com> - 2026-06-24 16:47 +0100
            Re: Yo Snipe snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2026-06-21 19:14 +0100
              Re: Yo Snipe Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-21 13:31 -0600
    Re: Yo Snipe snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2026-06-21 03:54 +0100

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

#690638 — Re: ð?³ï?â?ð???Yo Snipeð?³ï?â?ð???

Skeeter wrote:
> In article <n9qkh5Fh6kvU1@mid.individual.net>, j63840576
> @gmail.com says...
>>
>> Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <n9qc9cFftnpU2@mid.individual.net>, j63840576
>>> @gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> Yoi are so lame. It's not about usenet you dipshit. But it
>>>>> works that same way. Actully someone who is well versed in
>>>>> your antics is the creator.
>>>>
>>>> I agree, Sn!pe is most lame. You're prime, Skeeter. Alt.checkmate smells
>>>> like asshole today and this entire month, and not in a good way.
>>>> Although Sn!pe is not a Christian, at least he must believe in God, but
>>>> his sock On!on says not even that. Sn!pe, God predicted you, and with
>>>> any luck he predicted your detractors, may they ever be Blessed, too.
>>>>
>>>> Lay your head down child!
>>>
>>> Now that you shed your tears go sit down until we call
>>> you.
>>>
>> C'mon no one's going to believe this unless you add the obligatory tone
>> indication: </ritfab>
> 
> I don't even know what that is.
>>
>> "Red in the face and blustering!"
>>
>> or is it </rifab>?
>>
>> You just look silly and ridiculous without it. No one's fucking crying
>> you immature whelp. No one's humping anybody's leg. You're just full of
>> dementia and overdue for the mental fallacy clinic, you dullard.
> 
> That was cute.
>>
>> Go see a shrink, dullard Skeeter. I don't want to have to killfile you
>> here. Get interesting or go home. You're almost as much of a heel as
>> Sn!pe when you start whining like this. I'm going to have to take back
>> your "prime" medal, just like Poland rescinded Zelenskyy's award.
> 
> This is my group and you are just a visitor. Like the
> crazy uncle that drops in now and again. I don't know you
> and have nothing against you but you jumped on me.

Sorry, I'll work on getting alt.transgendered off the g-list. I reckon 
you have your own problems. I get red in the face about the VPN I have 
to use on the public network. It causes all kinds of mayhem in my news 
browser. You probably have similar issues deciding which bra to wear in 
the morning.

-- 
We eat the night, we drink the time
Make our dreams come true
And hungry eyes are passing by
On streets we call the zoo

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690640 — Re: �?���?��?��???Yo Snipe�?���?��?��???

In article <n9qsnaFietuU1@mid.individual.net>, j63840576
@gmail.com says...
> 
> Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <n9qkh5Fh6kvU1@mid.individual.net>, j63840576
> > @gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <n9qc9cFftnpU2@mid.individual.net>, j63840576
> >>> @gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> Yoi are so lame. It's not about usenet you dipshit. But it
> >>>>> works that same way. Actully someone who is well versed in
> >>>>> your antics is the creator.
> >>>>
> >>>> I agree, Sn!pe is most lame. You're prime, Skeeter. Alt.checkmate smells
> >>>> like asshole today and this entire month, and not in a good way.
> >>>> Although Sn!pe is not a Christian, at least he must believe in God, but
> >>>> his sock On!on says not even that. Sn!pe, God predicted you, and with
> >>>> any luck he predicted your detractors, may they ever be Blessed, too.
> >>>>
> >>>> Lay your head down child!
> >>>
> >>> Now that you shed your tears go sit down until we call
> >>> you.
> >>>
> >> C'mon no one's going to believe this unless you add the obligatory tone
> >> indication: </ritfab>
> > 
> > I don't even know what that is.
> >>
> >> "Red in the face and blustering!"
> >>
> >> or is it </rifab>?
> >>
> >> You just look silly and ridiculous without it. No one's fucking crying
> >> you immature whelp. No one's humping anybody's leg. You're just full of
> >> dementia and overdue for the mental fallacy clinic, you dullard.
> > 
> > That was cute.
> >>
> >> Go see a shrink, dullard Skeeter. I don't want to have to killfile you
> >> here. Get interesting or go home. You're almost as much of a heel as
> >> Sn!pe when you start whining like this. I'm going to have to take back
> >> your "prime" medal, just like Poland rescinded Zelenskyy's award.
> > 
> > This is my group and you are just a visitor. Like the
> > crazy uncle that drops in now and again. I don't know you
> > and have nothing against you but you jumped on me.
> 
> Sorry, I'll work on getting alt.transgendered off the g-list. I reckon 
> you have your own problems. I get red in the face about the VPN I have 
> to use on the public network. It causes all kinds of mayhem in my news 
> browser. You probably have similar issues deciding which bra to wear in 
> the morning.

You're just an idiot. Go sit down.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690651

On Sun, 21 Jun 2026 13:35:05 -0600, phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com>
wrote:

[...]

>> This is my group and you are just a visitor. Like the
>> crazy uncle that drops in now and again. I don't know you
>> and have nothing against you but you jumped on me.
>
>Sorry, I'll work on getting alt.transgendered off the g-list. I reckon 
>you have your own problems. I get red in the face about the VPN I have 
>to use on the public network. It causes all kinds of mayhem in my news 
>browser. You probably have similar issues deciding which bra to wear in 
>the morning.

     Robert is the transvestite. How can you confuse the two? I really
do want to know.

-- 
Bless me, Father, for I have committed an original sin.
I poked a badger with a spoon. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690652

On Sun, 21 Jun 2026 11:15:16 -0600, phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Skeeter wrote:
>> In article <n9qc9cFftnpU2@mid.individual.net>, j63840576
>> @gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> Skeeter wrote:
>>>> Yoi are so lame. It's not about usenet you dipshit. But it
>>>> works that same way. Actully someone who is well versed in
>>>> your antics is the creator.
>>>
>>> I agree, Sn!pe is most lame. You're prime, Skeeter. Alt.checkmate smells
>>> like asshole today and this entire month, and not in a good way.
>>> Although Sn!pe is not a Christian, at least he must believe in God, but
>>> his sock On!on says not even that. Sn!pe, God predicted you, and with
>>> any luck he predicted your detractors, may they ever be Blessed, too.
>>>
>>> Lay your head down child!
>> 
>> Now that you shed your tears go sit down until we call
>> you.
>> 
>C'mon no one's going to believe this unless you add the obligatory tone 
>indication: </ritfab>
>
>"Red in the face and blustering!"
>
>or is it </rifab>?
>
>You just look silly and ridiculous without it. No one's fucking crying 
>you immature whelp. 

     Other than you, of course.

>No one's humping anybody's leg. You're just full of 
>dementia and overdue for the mental fallacy clinic, you dullard.

     Says the guy who is DESPERATE to have people believe he is
mentally ill. And failing.

>
>Go see a shrink, dullard Skeeter. I don't want to have to killfile you 
>here. 

     And that would be detrimental to Skeeter, how?

>Get interesting or go home. You're almost as much of a heel as 
>Sn!pe when you start whining like this. I'm going to have to take back 
>your "prime" medal, just like Poland rescinded Zelenskyy's award.
>
>Damn dullards crawling all over like dog ticks.

     I am aware of only two of you. But you do express a greater
intellect than the other. So you have that going for you.

-- 
My youngest son finally gathered enough courage to ask the supermarket
cashier for a date. She said, "They're in the fruits section next to
the bananas."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690655

In article <4n3h3lp2fkeqr74d79a0h8cvh4rgis0on7@4ax.com>, 
Kenito@Benito.too says...
> 
> On Sun, 21 Jun 2026 11:15:16 -0600, phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >Skeeter wrote:
> >> In article <n9qc9cFftnpU2@mid.individual.net>, j63840576
> >> @gmail.com says...
> >>>
> >>> Skeeter wrote:
> >>>> Yoi are so lame. It's not about usenet you dipshit. But it
> >>>> works that same way. Actully someone who is well versed in
> >>>> your antics is the creator.
> >>>
> >>> I agree, Sn!pe is most lame. You're prime, Skeeter. Alt.checkmate smells
> >>> like asshole today and this entire month, and not in a good way.
> >>> Although Sn!pe is not a Christian, at least he must believe in God, but
> >>> his sock On!on says not even that. Sn!pe, God predicted you, and with
> >>> any luck he predicted your detractors, may they ever be Blessed, too.
> >>>
> >>> Lay your head down child!
> >> 
> >> Now that you shed your tears go sit down until we call
> >> you.
> >> 
> >C'mon no one's going to believe this unless you add the obligatory tone 
> >indication: </ritfab>
> >
> >"Red in the face and blustering!"
> >
> >or is it </rifab>?
> >
> >You just look silly and ridiculous without it. No one's fucking crying 
> >you immature whelp. 
> 
>      Other than you, of course.
> 
> >No one's humping anybody's leg. You're just full of 
> >dementia and overdue for the mental fallacy clinic, you dullard.
> 
>      Says the guy who is DESPERATE to have people believe he is
> mentally ill. And failing.
> 
> >
> >Go see a shrink, dullard Skeeter. I don't want to have to killfile you 
> >here. 
> 
>      And that would be detrimental to Skeeter, how?

I ignore him and jojo all the time but he feels the need 
to butt in and ramble on about Shit I know nothing about.
> 
> >Get interesting or go home. You're almost as much of a heel as 
> >Sn!pe when you start whining like this. I'm going to have to take back 
> >your "prime" medal, just like Poland rescinded Zelenskyy's award.
> >
> >Damn dullards crawling all over like dog ticks.
> 
>      I am aware of only two of you. But you do express a greater
> intellect than the other. So you have that going for you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690681

On Sun, 21 Jun 2026 20:02:19 -0600, Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote:

[...]

>> >Go see a shrink, dullard Skeeter. I don't want to have to killfile you 
>> >here. 
>> 
>>      And that would be detrimental to Skeeter, how?
>
>I ignore him and jojo all the time but he feels the need 
>to butt in and ramble on about Shit I know nothing about.

     For some reason, phoenix is DESPERATE to have people think he is
mentally ill. The problem is, he is trying so hard, he fails.

-- 
Ner'is vas'hana ter'es.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690684

On Mon, 22 Jun 2026 17:18:07 -0700, JodidoJudio <Kenito@Benito.too>
wrote:

>On Sun, 21 Jun 2026 20:02:19 -0600, Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>> >Go see a shrink, dullard Skeeter. I don't want to have to killfile you 
>>> >here. 
>>> 
>>>      And that would be detrimental to Skeeter, how?
>>
>>I ignore him and jojo all the time but he feels the need 
>>to butt in and ramble on about Shit I know nothing about.
>
>     For some [...]

Fuck off, Jodido, you genitally mutilated semite.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690631 — Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet?

In article <1KxTFHJk.kcENSo@243.42.239.243>, root@
127.0.0.1 says...
> Like, pedo stuff, for instance?
> 

Only you bring up pedo shit. Actually he and another 
hacked the NAMBLA web site years back and exposed many and 
also made off with the membership fees. It was even on the 
news. He has again taken a keen interest in you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690635 — Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ????Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet????? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? (Was: ????Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet?????)

In article <NoVImqIR1WRN6p$@140.174.19.164>, root@
127.0.0.1 says...
> 
> On Sun, 21 Jun 2026 10:23:44 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; Skeeter Skeeter Fake 
> News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
> <invalid@none.com>" determined that the following was of great
> importance to Skeeter <invalid@none.com> and subsequently decided to
> freely share it with us in
> <MPG.44a1bdfff0270a5598c20f@usnews.blocknews.net>:
>  
> =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?=Inarticle<1KxTFHJk.kcENSo@243.42.239.243>,root@127.0.0.1says...
> =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?==?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?=Like,pedostuff,forinstance?
> =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?=
> =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?=Onlyyoubringuppedoshit.ActuallyheandanotherhackedtheNAMBLA
> =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?=websiteyearsbackandexposedmanyandalsomadeoffwiththe
> =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?=membershipfees.Itwasevenonthenews.Hehasagaintakenakeen
> =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?=interestinyou.
> =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?=
> 
> Tell them about your buddy Jim, k0ok.
> 
> Too bad they didn't come here and boot his ass off of usenet, eh?

Actually Check was a friend to all of them. They hate you 
though. I think it's time for a welfare check for you 
since you always talk about pedophilia. My buddy seems to 
know a lot about you and where you work. Just saying he is 
good at what he does so behave yourself.
> 
> --
> 
> <https://groups.google.com/g/airnews.dupes/c/-toK23mkxU8/m/_LkkoaG1fQIJ>
> News Administration for Airnews!
> Jun 15, 2000, 3:00:00 AM
> to
> This is an index of all posts rejected for being a duplicate on the
> date noted below. Only posts originating from Internet America are
> screened. These are sorted by identical content, not by posting time.
> The line post.post.llllll can be used to locate the first 30 lines of
> the actual article posted in a second article in this group. These can
> be quite large, so check the Subject: line for the size before downloading.
> Period Ending: jun-15 ~00:00 Central Time
> Amount: 775 duplicates containing 223294 K of data not added to USENET
> 
> ----Index of rejected posts:
> 
> [...]
> 
> post.post.aaxmpa --------------
> From: themo...@nospam.bigfoot.com (Molecule)
> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.multimedia.erotica.repost
> Subject: (TomMix) Little White Chicks/Big Black Monster Dicks 3m/1f/bj/fk/2fac -
> Message-ID: <01B72C412904FFAA.F68BC7F3...@lp.airnews.net>
> NNTP-Posting-Time: Wed Jun 14 06:00:24 2000
> NNTP-Posting-Host: !Z!O:1k-W&]"](<FV%r*Et`,6 (Encoded at Airnews!)
> 
> post.post.aaEzta --------------
> From: themo...@nospam.bigfoot.com (Molecule)
> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.multimedia.erotica.repost
> Subject: (TomMix) Little White Chicks/Big Black Monster Dicks 3m/1f/bj/fk/2fac -
> Message-ID: <09D6876B59771A63.A93FB4E0...@lp.airnews.net>
> NNTP-Posting-Time: Wed Jun 14 05:22:47 2000
> NNTP-Posting-Host: !Z!O:1k-W&]"](<FV%r*Et`,6 (Encoded at Airnews!)
> 
> post.post.aaztxa --------------
> From: themo...@nospam.bigfoot.com (Molecule)
> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.multimedia.erotica.repost
> Subject: (TomMix) Little White Chicks/Big Black Monster Dicks 3m/1f/bj/fk/2fac -
> Message-ID: <0E90CFC05C667CC2.27F5DF12...@lp.airnews.net>
> NNTP-Posting-Time: Wed Jun 14 05:24:02 2000
> NNTP-Posting-Host: !Z!O:1k-W&]"](<FV%r*Et`,6 (Encoded at Airnews!)
> 
> (63 other rejected posts redacted)
> 
> Obviously, these likely weren't being re-posted by Tom, but you can plainly see his "branding" in the Subject: field.
> 
> Is TomMix yet another perverted cismale sex criminal who's into hardcore pr0n and misogynistic exploitation of women that's got lots to say about trans women?
> 
> --
> 
> <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.arts.movies.erotica/c/wOAce3-bLzo/m/NMTo96Vx2n8J>
> In article <rame.981541205p31956@bash>,
> TomMix <TomMix@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> >I stayed in a Holiday Inn in Texas about six months ago. I looked at
> >the porn channel just to see what it was like in the bible-belt. I
> >think the film was a censored hardcore flick with some of the action
> >put back in to keep you from being completely bored. They also cut-out
> >the cum-shot.
> 
> https://groups.google.com/g/rec.arts.movies.erotica/c/VgwBqTEjx5Y/m/nCCTvM8UM34J
> TomMix
> unread,
> Apr 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM
> to
> Vic Apocalypse <rc...@iserv.net> wrote:
> >I have noticed that GS and fisting video is available for purchase in
> >the US via the internet -- what happens if I actually order such a
> >product? Does it actually arrive? Do the feds arrive as well?
> >
> >I don't really want to drive over to Windsor (assuming that rumor is
> >true).
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I didn't have any trouble getting my order filled from
> xxx-imports (US) or videodrome (canada).
> 
> I've only placed one order with each outfit, but they each came though
> OK. The videodrome came as a bare cassette and without a factory type
> label. XXX-import came with the original case and label. The canada $
> being down, makes videodrome a little bit cheaper, but you do seem to
> get a little less from them.
> 
> TomMix
> 
> Message-ID: <slrn10t1vbc.22sd6.tommix@devnull.org>
> "When someone can�t defend their point, they reach for the lowest thing they can think of and hope it distracts from the fact they�ve got nothing of substance left to say." - Tom Mix right before he reaches for the lowest thing he can think of
> 
> --
> 
> Anton Eaks is a sockpuppeting troll:
> 
> From: Donald Trump <noemail@aol.com>
> posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+C4Ys9W76hsOFvKQYp7+8v"; posting-host="82cded5d211e2e5858d923a18468d8ff"
> Message-ID: <MPG.447166d2b63a6b309896b1@news.eternal-september.org>
> [...]
> You know I have been waiting since Fakey called all the 
> alphabet law on me, and then Jen supposed to have called 
> and also gonna get me for copyright infringement because I 
> steal movies and games off the net. Oh the DEA because Jen 
> thinks I am cartel. ho hum.
> 
> Skeeter replies to his own sock for clarity:
> 
> From: Skeeter <invalid@none.com>
> Message-ID: <MPG.447167454401ecc198b7bb@usnews.blocknews.net>
> 
> In article <MPG.447166d2b63a6b309896b1@news.eternal-
> september.org>, noemail@aol.com says...
> BWAHAHAHAHA..... I was torlling another froup and forgot 
> to switch servers. LOL
> 
> --
> 
> "I love it when you melt down. You love me so much you post a mile logs sig all about me. But since you're a fag you will get nowhere with me." - Anton "Skeeter" Eaks in <MPG.44655a309bf8fd9898b623@usnews.blocknews.net>
> 
> Anton Eaks' Harassment/menacing Evidence:
> 
> Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 13:14:59 -0600
> Message-ID: <MPG.447a59234a24907298b8be@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "Grab an AR and go shoot the place up, that will show them."
> 
> Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 12:53:04 -0600
> Message-ID: <MPG.44726afb84d25b1198b7d3@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "You're a fag and it's time to send some more anonymous mails."
> 
> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 09:36:01 -0600
> Message-ID: <MPG.443597cfd9dc917498b38c@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "<I shared your info>"
> 
> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 07:53:23 -0600
> Message-ID: <MPG.443039c02e50741298b341@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "Piss off faggot. Sleep light and pay attention."
> 
> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 07:26:35 -0600
> Message-ID: <MPG.442c3ef697f30f6598b2ed@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "You fucked up. Now the fun begins."
> 
> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 07:28:35 -0600
> Message-ID: <MPG.442c3f73510def3798b2ee@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "I know it (Jen's Address) and I also know where he works."
> 
> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 07:58:08 -0600
> Message-ID: <MPG.442af4dd1d02d1d798b2ca@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "I know someone who does not like him at all. Robert knows 
> what this guy is capable of. I guess it's time to spank 
> Robert again. His boss will find it interesting."
> 
> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2026 10:27:58 -0600
> Message-ID: <MPG.4429c67ed5a2fc7798b2bd@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "What matters most is how your boss.....well nevermind."
> 
> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2026 09:31:29 -0600
> Message-ID: <MPG.4429b940c16cb95d98b2af@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "Oh there are others taking an interest."
> 
> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2026 09:27:37 -0600
> Message-ID: <MPG.4429b851f57fc6be98b2aa@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "Now about that job of yours."
> 
> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:41:02 -0600
> Message-ID: <MPG.442315e7bfd756bb98b1ff@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "I am for real this time. Gonna put you one the front burner. 
> Stay alert."
> 
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 10:46:59 -0700
> Message-ID: <MPG.440f7afdc13dea7d98b108@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "I guess it's time to get a hold of our friend Steve. 
> You're getting out of line again."
> 
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 10:48:20 -0700
> Message-ID: <MPG.440f7b52f29cd68c98b10a@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "Any funny emails at your job?"
> 
> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 09:12:09 -0700
> Message-ID: <MPG.439a0f49e9d22c798a8f6@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "You better do something. Shit is about to get real."
> 
> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:04:37 -0600
> Message-ID: <MPG.4261b61b538404fa989cba@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "You don't own a gun but maybe we better find out."
> 
> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:07:20 -0600
> Message-ID: <MPG.42630847d6f576de989d0d@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "Piss off and sleep light."
> 
> Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 05:37:30 -0600
> Message-ID: <MPG.426e8a69c10dff41989f31@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "I think it's time you got a wake up call."
> 
> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 08:37:06 -0600
> Message-ID: <MPG.42754bfa355cfc0998a055@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "I know enough to cause you grief."
> 
> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2025 10:24:37 -0600
> Message-ID: <MPG.43388333854ff93498a4de@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "i wonder if they have the red flag rule there, time to 
> find out"
> 
> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 09:42:47 -0600
> Message-ID: <6665cd78$0$3747334$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
> "Guess It's time to have my old AHM buddies have some more fun."
> 
> Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 10:27:21 -0700
> Message-ID: <MPG.401701e322ea65e6990ea1@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "Snitches get stitches."
> 
> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 08:46:05 -0700
> Message-ID: <MPG.4011a42a6603a80f990cde@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "Well I backed off of my plan but now I have changed my mind. It's a go."
> 
> Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 10:28:27 -0700
> Message-ID: <MPG.40033ba117e89214990b09@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "Yours could get interesting."
> 
> Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 05:54:20 -0700
> Message-ID: <MPG.4001a9e51ddb434d990a3d@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "Guess it's time to make you famous again. Watch for links."
> 
> Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 06:42:42 -0700
> Message-ID: <MPG.4001b52e6ed1d33c990a44@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "Wait for it. This time it's gonna get spread widely."
> 
> Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 06:22:53 -0700
> Message-ID: <MPG.4001b09ce286a712990a42@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "Since you are so into outing it's time for a refresher course on who and where you are."
> 
> Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 06:56:22 -0700
> Message-ID: <MPG.4001b8665277410d990a50@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "Wait for it. It might show up on some local web site there."
> 
> Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 07:16:49 -0700
> Message-ID: <MPG.4001bd3ce67e85b2990a58@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "I bet he's shaking in his slippers."
> 
> Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 08:45:24 -0700
> Message-ID: <MPG.4001d202159abc6990a63@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "You fucked up because I have you scared. Have I sent an email yet? Maybe 
> maybe not."
> 
> Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 13:34:34 -0600
> Message-ID: <MPG.3eea89b6a3d77a0d98d5f4@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "Answering your own socks now? Damn you need a welfare check. I might
> just have to arrange that."
> 
> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 14:15:04 -0600
> Message-ID: <MPG.3e7a83b27c6f371298ba35@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "Pittsburgh. Plenty of info available if so needed."
> 
> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 15:26:28 -0700
> Message-ID: <MPG.3e6ad0818861d4ed98b634@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "I think it's time to play with the info I have. Just for shits and 
> grins. Just ignore those unmarked phone calls."
> 
> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 16:50:02 -0700
> Message-ID: <MPG.3e6ae41746d0c0ce98b652@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "I will send out a little birdy."
> 
> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 16:53:09 -0700
> Message-ID: <MPG.3e6ae4cfd471d67698b653@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "It's not a threat, it's a promise."
> 
> Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 11:45:33 -0700
> Message-ID: <MPG.3e1cd438318b8c2a98ac2c@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "I think it's time I contact your friends."
> 
> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 12:27:12 -0600
> Message-ID: <MPG.3d9f914395f99a47989806@usnews.blocknews.net>
> "Believe me they are still watching."
> "I have notified one and told them to proceed with plan 2."
> 
> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:03:56 -0600
> Message-ID: <dbarchlleqfk377ees81536qvccf2n609b@4ax.com>
> "You sound scared, are you scared?"
> 
> Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 12:01:01 -0600
> Message-ID: <6u4mchpoa1sbcg4i0cjpntoct3dr9p8a36@4ax.com>
> "I'm up for a trip to Pitts."
> 
> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:08:04 -0600
> Message-ID: <4darchl4a7hocc33t83jmfov74hvh4ndfp@4ax.com>
> "This :localghOst seems to own you. I can tell you it is not Checkmate.
> I have kown LocalghOst for years and you are so wrong."
> 
> <https://www.rmequality.org/post/legal-protections-for-trans-people-in-colorado>
> 
> Colorado�s hate crime laws protect individuals from crimes motivated either entirely or partly by bias against sexual orientation and/or gender identity (H.B. 05-1014). Bias-motivated charges apply in cases where crimes are determined to be motivated by prejudice against LGBTQ+ individuals.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690639 — Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ????Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet????? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? (Was: ????Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet?????)

Skeeter wrote:
> Actually Check was a friend to all of them. They hate you
> though. I think it's time for a welfare check for you
> since you always talk about pedophilia. My buddy seems to
> know a lot about you and where you work. Just saying he is
> good at what he does so behave yourself.

Is it too much to ask for the two of you to collide like matter and 
anti-matter and just explode? Who wants the two extremists you are in 
any group? You and Jen should just explode and the groups would be 
better off, I must say. I must say this.

-- 
We eat the night, we drink the time
Make our dreams come true
And hungry eyes are passing by
On streets we call the zoo

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690641 — Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ????Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet????? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? (Was: ????Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet?????)

In article <n9qsseFietuU2@mid.individual.net>, j63840576
@gmail.com says...
> 
> Skeeter wrote:
> > Actually Check was a friend to all of them. They hate you
> > though. I think it's time for a welfare check for you
> > since you always talk about pedophilia. My buddy seems to
> > know a lot about you and where you work. Just saying he is
> > good at what he does so behave yourself.
> 
> Is it too much to ask for the two of you to collide like matter and 
> anti-matter and just explode? Who wants the two extremists you are in 
> any group? You and Jen should just explode and the groups would be 
> better off, I must say. I must say this.

Blah Blah.. Jen deserves what is about to happen. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690650 — Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet

On Sun, 21 Jun 2026 13:37:50 -0600, phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Skeeter wrote:
>> Actually Check was a friend to all of them. They hate you
>> though. I think it's time for a welfare check for you
>> since you always talk about pedophilia. My buddy seems to
>> know a lot about you and where you work. Just saying he is
>> good at what he does so behave yourself.
>
>Is it too much to ask for the two of you to collide like matter and 
>anti-matter and just explode? Who wants the two extremists you are in 
>any group? You and Jen should just explode and the groups would be 
>better off, I must say. I must say this.

     I don't know what is supposed to "happen" to Robert, if anything,
but his expressing his interest in children should concern all. You
may recall when I pointed out that so long as Robert, and whomever he
is having sex with, can consent, do consent, and do not infringe on
the rights of others, no one should care. He insists that's grooming.
The ONLY way he can hold that view is if he firmly believes children
can consent. 
     His sole out is to state he's simply been pretending to a
predator on Usenet. If it's been an act the whole time, Robert needs
to explain what motivates him.
     If his presentations are accurate, he is lucking merely BEING a
pedophile isn't illegal. And there is no evidence he's acted on his
desires in real life.

-- 
I saw the face of Jesus in my tub of margarine.
I can't believe it's not Buddha.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690654 — Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet

In article <kl3h3ltvjeghsbqsn2hpr4fjpsd6ma5oad@4ax.com>, 
Kenito@Benito.too says...
> I saw the face of Jesus in my tub of margarine.
> I can't believe it's not Buddha.
> 

LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690645 — Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ????? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? (Was: ????? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?)

In article <82vphO6wW9Z3YH1@35.100.208.74>, root@127.0.0.1 
says...
> I know you think you're being "cute" with your attention-begging veiled threats, but I was asked to keep my department head informed if any threats were made regarding the workplace.  And here we are...

Where are we?
> 
> So enjoy that, asshole.

Oh immensely.
> 
> Seems you might eventually get the proper attention that you deserve, after all.

I dint do nuffen.  LOL
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690649 — Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet?

On Sun, 21 Jun 2026 10:23:44 -0600, Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote:

>In article <1KxTFHJk.kcENSo@243.42.239.243>, root@
>127.0.0.1 says...
>> Like, pedo stuff, for instance?
>
>Only you bring up pedo shit. 

     Robert firmly believes children can consent. Or he lied. If he
was being less than honest, he will need to explain what he hopes to
gain from such dishonesty.

>Actually he and another 
>hacked the NAMBLA web site years back and exposed many and 
>also made off with the membership fees. It was even on the 
>news. He has again taken a keen interest in you.

     Robert's made it clear he has an interest in children that cannot
be seen as acceptable. I don't know that he's acted on this interest.
     This presumes he was being honest about the matter. Robert is
known to lie a lot.

-- 
"I can out-obsess anyone when I set my mind to it" 
   ~ Robert "Jen" Wolfe

"How many of you here have diabetes or pre-diabetes from fast food 
addiction and how many blame Obama?"
Robert proving his learning disability makes him believe fast food
causes diabetes, and that President Obama is to blame.
Message-ID: <dhkJNaOI13YerY$@197.40.97.151>

"Kent is culturally-appropriating "Romani", you see, and therefore he
believes in Fortune telling..."
Robert "Jen" Wolfe PROVING he's a racist in
Message-ID: <8JpWvL$YKVp0SPt@148.199.131.234>

"It's a good thing you aren't anything but another entitled white
Caucasian piece of shit"
Robert "Jen" Wolfe PROVING he's racist by claiming the Romani are
"white" in Message-ID: <oFIJ.pdZQMuda31@201.157.243.58>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690659 — Re: �?��️�?��???Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet?�?��️�?��???

In article <8lxI2xgIpSOI.71@185.61.72.196>, root@127.0.0.1 
says...
> Jim "Checkmate" Gorman's daughter was not able to consent as she was 13 when he sexually assaulted her, therefore Jim is a common rapist.  
> 
> I argued this fact at great length, but Jim and Skeeter and their buddy who claimed he was going to "murder me violently" for using a public restroom for pointing out this fact went on for over a year defending the rapist and his public defamation of his victim.
> 
> He's apparently the bestest of pals with Skeeter and Skeeter's AHM/NAMBLA friends, though.
> 
> Thanks for pointing this out, Kent Bradley Wills.
> 
You doith protest to loud.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690680 — Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet

On Sun, 21 Jun 2026 21:01:36 -0600, Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote:

>In article <8lxI2xgIpSOI.71@185.61.72.196>, root@127.0.0.1 
>says...
>> Jim "Checkmate" Gorman's daughter was not able to consent as she was 13 when he sexually assaulted her, therefore Jim is a common rapist.  
>> 
>> I argued this fact at great length, but Jim and Skeeter and their buddy who claimed he was going to "murder me violently" for using a public restroom for pointing out this fact went on for over a year defending the rapist and his public defamation of his victim.
>> 
>> He's apparently the bestest of pals with Skeeter and Skeeter's AHM/NAMBLA friends, though.
>> 
>> Thanks for pointing this out, Kent Bradley Wills.
>> 
>You doith protest to loud.

      I see Robert is still claiming Checkmate was someone he was not.
It's as if Robert is so far detached from reality, he is simply unable
to accept it.
     And he's still posting hundreds of lines expressing his
delusions, as evidenced by his posts being filtered. Any posts over
250 lines will not be seen by me. 
     Further, he still has an irrational fear of his enter key.


"I can out-obsess anyone when I set my mind to it" 
   ~ Robert "Jen" Wolfe

"How many of you here have diabetes or pre-diabetes from fast food 
addiction and how many blame Obama?"
Robert proving his learning disability makes him believe fast food
causes diabetes, and that President Obama is to blame.
Message-ID: <dhkJNaOI13YerY$@197.40.97.151>

"Kent is culturally-appropriating "Romani", you see, and therefore he
believes in Fortune telling..."
Robert "Jen" Wolfe PROVING he's a racist in
Message-ID: <8JpWvL$YKVp0SPt@148.199.131.234>

"It's a good thing you aren't anything but another entitled white
Caucasian piece of shit"
Robert "Jen" Wolfe PROVING he's racist by claiming the Romani are
"white" in Message-ID: <oFIJ.pdZQMuda31@201.157.243.58>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690683 — Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet

On Mon, 22 Jun 2026 17:17:55 -0700, JodidoJudio <Kenito@Benito.too>
wrote:

>On Sun, 21 Jun 2026 21:01:36 -0600, Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote:
>
>>In article <8lxI2xgIpSOI.71@185.61.72.196>, root@127.0.0.1 
>>says...
>>> Jim "Checkmate" Gorman's daughter was not able to consent as she was 13 when he sexually assaulted her, therefore Jim is a common rapist.  
>>> 
>>> I argued this fact at great length, but Jim and Skeeter and their buddy who claimed he was going to "murder me violently" for using a public restroom for pointing out this fact went on for over a year defending the rapist and his public defamation of his victim.
>>> 
>>> He's apparently the bestest of pals with Skeeter and Skeeter's AHM/NAMBLA friends, though.
>>> 
>>> Thanks for pointing this out, Kent Bradley Wills.
>>> 
>>You doith protest to loud.
>
>      I see [...]

Fuck off, Jodido, you genitally mutilated semite.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690686 — Re: �?��️�?��???Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet�?��️�?��???

In article <0I2VcPbt9kYhNyy@173.186.68.32>, root@127.0.0.1 
says...
> 
> <https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&q=james+robert+gorman+silverado>
> 
> 
> Are you a pedo protector, Kent Bradley Wills?
> 

YOU seem to think about it daily. So you came up in 
conversation today. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690719 — Re: Is it for all of the things you guys are too scared to say on usenet

On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 08:12:26 -0600, Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote:

>In article <0I2VcPbt9kYhNyy@173.186.68.32>, root@127.0.0.1 
>says...
>> 
>> <https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&q=james+robert+gorman+silverado>
>> 
>> 
>> Are you a pedo protector, Kent Bradley Wills?
>
>YOU seem to think about it daily. So you came up in 
>conversation today. 

     Why would Robert, who INSISTS I am Kent Bradley Wills, ever think
I would protect him? Anyone have a guess?


"I can out-obsess anyone when I set my mind to it" 
   ~ Robert "Jen" Wolfe

"How many of you here have diabetes or pre-diabetes from fast food 
addiction and how many blame Obama?"
Robert proving his learning disability makes him believe fast food
causes diabetes, and that President Obama is to blame.
Message-ID: <dhkJNaOI13YerY$@197.40.97.151>

"Kent is culturally-appropriating "Romani", you see, and therefore he
believes in Fortune telling..."
Robert "Jen" Wolfe PROVING he's a racist in
Message-ID: <8JpWvL$YKVp0SPt@148.199.131.234>

"It's a good thing you aren't anything but another entitled white
Caucasian piece of shit"
Robert "Jen" Wolfe PROVING he's racist by claiming the Romani are
"white" in Message-ID: <oFIJ.pdZQMuda31@201.157.243.58>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate

csiph-web